Slashdot Mirror


Former Reddit CEO Decries 'Rage-Induced Interactions' on Facebook and Twitter (wired.com)

Were the creators of Facebook and Twitter oblivious to how social networks could be abused? "I struggle to believe that these brilliant product CEOs, who have created social media services used by millions of people worldwide, are actually naive," writes Ellen Pao, the former CEO of Reddit. "It's a lot more likely that they simply don't care." [S]ocial media companies and the leaders who run them are rewarded for focusing on reach and engagement, not for positive impact or for protecting subsets of users from harm. They're rewarded for keeping costs down, which encourages the free-for-all, anything-goes approach misnomered "free speech." If they don't need to monitor their platforms, they don't need to come up with real policies -- and avoid paying for all the people and tools required to implement them....

In the earliest days, it wasn't always obvious what these platforms were doing and what they would become -- even to insiders. But at a certain point, it became clear that money was the driving factor, and dopamine- or rage-induced interactions meant more money.... CEOs should just forget about hiding behind "naivete" and "free speech," and instead remind themselves they can take actions that will meaningfully change the direction of the future. The first step is acknowledging the problem... You've solved for increasing engagement; now it's time to make real, positive interactions a priority.

The next time a CEO claims ignorance, "we must hold them accountable," the essay argues, complaining that right now there's a vacuum of leadership.

So instead, "Everyone's holding hands on the road to hell."

164 comments

  1. Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Failing to mention that the author is Ellen Pao and just saying "former CEO of Reddit"

    1. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confuscating and hiding information are the primary weapons of the Fake News, in which I occasionally include Slashdot.

    2. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess "Ellen Pao" is a toxic brand nowadays.

    3. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All there is is 'Fake News' now. Possibly that's all there ever was, but the media as a whole definitely seems strikingly shittier than 5 years ago (which is remarkable considering how shitty it was even then).

    4. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      The very same Ellen Pao who tweeted: "CEOs of big tech companies: You almost certainly have incels as employees. What are you going to do about it?"

      Was she demanding that single people be fired?
      Was she demanding that CEOs of big tech companies provide arranged marriages to their employees?

      No wonder they hid her name from TFS.
      Who knows what goes in her head.

    5. Re: Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that weird? I have no idea who Ellan Pao is and have no idea who the current CEO of Reddit is. I doubt I'm the only one....

    6. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything she did was not undone by the next guy. She was just there to enact those policies then bow out. The monster reddit was slightly tamed. The policy of kicking people out for 'wrongspeak' was set in motion. It continues.

    7. Re: Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't she marry the black serial discrimination victim who also happened to be a cock smoking homo? Is anyone surprised her politics are toxic?

    8. Re:Weirdest editing by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      The very same Ellen Pao who tweeted: "CEOs of big tech companies: You almost certainly have incels as employees. What are you going to do about it?"

      How about company-owned bawdy houses, like in the old west mining towns? Ellen? Hello, are you still there?

    9. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because MRA snowflakes immediately hate everything she says. Better to let the merits stand for themselves before letting misogyny override rational thought.

    10. Re: Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He only claimed discrimination after their NYC co-op refused to let him buy another apartment after they allowed him to buy two. He said it was racial discrimination, they said it was because of his shaky finances. Three public pension agencies, who were clients of his hedge fund, accused him of fraud worth about $145 million. His company declared bankruptcy and both the SEC and FBI were investigating him.

      Seems Ellen Pao married another scammer. They must have a great marriage.

    11. Re: Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot effect vs reddit

      That is why. Someone will think reddit is calling all other sites with self-moderation shitty.

    12. Re: Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light mayo, please

    13. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another racist Asian like Jeong who spits in the face of white created free speech.

    14. Re:Weirdest editing by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course that makes a difference. The world has two kinds of people, good people whose opinions you should trust without question, and bad people, whose opinions you should reject without consideration.

      I take it Pao is one of the bad people.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Weirdest editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the massive exodus of right wingers from STEM fields, their inability to get hired in any capacity for science, math, or computer skills, and the well known fact that all incels are right wing men, I think the situation has mostly solved itself.

  2. Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You don't have to be a Hillary supporter (I'm sure as hell not) to see how this GOP has fallen in line with a fraud and declared war on America's institutions and norms. That people get upset on Twitter should be the absolute minimum.

    Civility requires honesty. Frauds do not deserve it. Trump is a criminal on many counts regardless of whether you support his policies or not. Realizing that and separating political wishes from factual reality should not be this difficult.

    When Mueller pulls the trigger and America steers back towards rule of law, will this Republican party go with it? It's an open question as they reject the foundation that made America great once.

    1. Re: Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIFY: Find/replace GOP and Trump with DNC or SJW and Hillary.

    2. Re:Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "To you, there is no debate" True, the facts are what they are despite Trump's bullshit denials that retarded deplorable faggots defend KNOWING it's untrue. The Witch Hunt -TM keeps catching witches and getting them to confess.

      Deal with it. Trump is guilty of crimes. There's no two ways about it. If you want civility you have to admit the honest facts of the matter. Then you earn my respect as a Republican, not before. Not while defending an obvious fraud.

      The fact that the GOP has gotten behind him and undermined America's norms "to fit" is entirely factual and a separate point, but I'll entertain your rebuttal after you admit Trump is without any question guilty of several provable crimes.

      You will never catch me defending a traitor, knowingly or otherwise. Check yourself. Until you do, you can't be worthy of respect or even civility.

    3. Re:Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To you, there is no debate" True, the facts are what they are despite Trump's bullshit denials that retarded deplorable faggots defend KNOWING it's untrue. The Witch Hunt -TM keeps catching witches and getting them to confess.

      Deal with it. Trump is guilty of crimes. There's no two ways about it. If you want civility you have to admit the honest facts of the matter. Then you earn my respect as a Republican, not before. Not while defending an obvious fraud.

      The fact that the GOP has gotten behind him and undermined America's norms "to fit" is entirely factual and a separate point, but I'll entertain your rebuttal after you admit Trump is without any question guilty of several provable crimes.

      You will never catch me defending a traitor, knowingly or otherwise. Check yourself. Until you do, you can't be worthy of respect or even civility.

      But Hillary is squeaky clean, right?

      Or do you agree that she should share a cell with Trump. Now that would be fun to see!

    4. Re:Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I never did say Hillary was "clean" nor did I vote for her. She is guilty of violations of statutes, but evidence of intent to disseminate classified info was not found. Further the issue was the 14th Amendment's "equal enforcement" clause requiring similar crimes to have been prosecuted equally prior to HRC's violations, which in literally thousands of cases from Colin Powell to Jeb Bush and beyond was never sought and never pursued. I found her to be corrupt and dishonest, but she did at the very least release her tax records and hasn't lied (repeatedly, recursively) about contacts with foreign nationals as far as we can prove. She also is not in power, nor is there any credible threat of her returning to it. She does not represent the US Government right now, she is not continuing to commit provable crimes like Donald Trump's emoluments or tax frauds or lies to investigators - or anything else. I do think her charity situation should and will be investigated for thorough fairness, and I think any violations that she covered up there ought to be met with the full force of applicable law. Try to find a Trump defender saying anything resembling any of that about the proven liar spinning a bullshit narrative he self-contradicts daily about a very, very serious crime that may in fact be rhetorically akin to treason were the US to declare war on Russia for WMD attacks or election hacks or anything else. It's serious to defend a traitor, casually or otherwise.

      Anything there you'd like to debate, I'm happy to - as soon as you admit that Trump is guilty of provable crimes as I have also insinuated is possible with HRC. Until then you're blinded by partisanship and not accepting reality.

      I mean that in the proverbial "you" not you personally, who I do not know and haven't debated this with at length.

    5. Re:Republicans declared war on America's norms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you two are fighting over crap sandwiches, I'm going to have a nap. Wake me up if the world survives.

  3. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
    Zuck: Just ask
    Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
    [Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
    Zuck: People just submitted it.
    Zuck: I don't know why.
    Zuck: They "trust me"
    Zuck: Dumb fucks

  4. I gotta be honest by rsilvergun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    it's hard not to rage sometimes. I've got friends and family who stuggle daily to get the healthcare they need (one of whom's a type-I diabetic). I'm paying through the nose for my kid's college (she's in for medicine, her books in year 3 for 1 semester were $1400). Meanwhile people keep telling me she should just be a welder a few make $26/hr ignoring that's only the top 10% and they're doing dangerous work.

    It'd be one thing if I couldn't use the Internet to see how the rest of the world solved all these problems with ease, or if America was a poor country, but again, I've got the Internet. I know better.

    Hell, 70% of Americans want Medicare for All and even if the Dems take the House it won't even get a vote there. Nancy Pelosi will shut it down for her corporate masters. She won her primary against a challenger that wanted Medicare for All.

    So yeah, I rage a lot. I rage because I keep seeing the same damn mistakes for no good reason and people voting not just against their interests, but litterally against policies they support. How am I not supposed to get angry?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poor leaders hands are tied. Oh what can they do! Just another article be those with the power to make change lamenting how they dont have enough power. That's rage inducing right there.

      With Poloski she wins her district time after time with the highest percentage nation wide. We're gonna be stuck with her for a long time it seems. Stay strong.

    2. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "People who hate government hate themselves" - George Carlin.
      That is true in countries that elect their government.
      You don't like you politicians? elect different ones!
      Remember, politicians are only slightly smarter than the people who elected them.
      Corollary, if you have an Idiots at the helm, it already tells you something about the voters.

    3. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There it is right there. And it's modded a fucking '2' lol.

    4. Re:I gotta be honest by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile people keep telling me she should just be a welder a few make $26/hr ignoring that's only the top 10% and they're doing dangerous work.

      Welding is not dangerous, and $26/hr is way less than the top 10% make. Pay is proportional to skill. If all you know how to do is stick welding from your high school shop class, you may not make much. But if you learn MIG, TIG, or acetylene welding, and are good at it, you can earn $50/hr or more even in flyover country.

      Disclaimer: I am not a very good welder.

    5. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm paying through the nose for my kid's college (she's in for medicine, her books in year 3 for 1 semester were $1400)

      You people never ever contemplate why this is so costly. You just demand "pay! pay! pay!" from everyone else. Sorry, but this racket is getting as much money as it's going to from daddy 'gubmint.

      Medicare for All

      So, on one hand you're funding a medical education and on the other you're advocating a policy that's absolutely certain to hand medical professionals an epic pay cut...

    6. Re:I gotta be honest by Ashthon · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with social media, and all internet discussion, is people like you who can't stay on topic and want to turn everything into a discussion about politics. Rather than being about social media, your post is about college costs, medical costs and Nancy Pelosi. You try to loosely associate it with the topic with the first and last sentence, but really it's just an off-topic rant. Then some people who agree with your opinion come and upvote your post, making it the most prominent on the page, so the discussion becomes completely derailed.

      People like you ruin internet discussion for others. When every topic turns into a discussion about politics, people simply give up and stop participating.

      You are the problem. Please stop.

    7. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        Meanwhile people keep telling me she should just be a welder a few make $26/hr ignoring that's only the top 10% and they're doing dangerous work.

      Don't discount trade work. Plumbers and Electricians do pretty well. Certain trained construction workers do quite well too. I'm not sure why you picked welding, but there's a TON of highly paid skilled labor work out there that doesn't require you to get 100 grand in debt for an education. According to this, the average wage of a plumber is 52 grand in 2016. That's a $26 an hour wage. And that's the AVERAGE. In some cities it's much better.

      https://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/plumber/salary

      Trade work isn't for everyone, but it's a good economic choice that shouldn't be ignored.


      Nancy Pelosi will shut it down for her corporate masters. She won her primary against a challenger that wanted Medicare for All.

      Yup, pretty much this. That's why some Democrats just loooove this identity politics stuff. It's a wedge issue that motivates their base, they just have to keep talking about the poor, disadvantaged (whatever people here), do nothing about it because there's little than can be done (maybe pass some silly meaningless resolution here or there), and they don't piss off their corporate masters because SJW stuff doesn't cost business dime one since it doesn't raise taxes, or provide any real services. Plus, the corporate masters get to feel like they're one of the good guys, since they support gay marriage, or are anti-bathroom bills. Perfect! What... you want affordable Healthcare? Radical! Why can't you talk about how isms are ruining everything? We don't like it when you change how the money works.

      Some day we'll get past all this ID politics crap, and then maybe we'll actually get something done.

    8. Re:I gotta be honest by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Underwater welding is actually EXTREMELY dangerous. Its one of the most dangerous professions on the planet.

    9. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Underwater welding is actually EXTREMELY dangerous. Its one of the most dangerous professions on the planet.

      And they also have better take-home pay than doctors. Commensurate.

      Although the death rate for underwater welders is still less than a boring press-operator job in a factory making 12 an hour.

    10. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your entire rant here is off topic also by your own criteria though! You also don't decide what "the" problem is, nor what people can talk about on any given topic including politics. You don't own or control this platform.

      Deal with it snowflake.

    11. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How am I not supposed to get angry?

      /

      You can begin by becoming an adult, and work from there.

    12. Re:I gotta be honest by MrBrklyn · · Score: 1

      >> So yeah, I rage a lot.

      This can be treated with drugs, but until then, I suggest you stay off of social media.

      --
      http://www.mrbrklyn.com/amsterdam.html http://www.brooklyn-living.com
    13. Re:I gotta be honest by MrBrklyn · · Score: 1

      >>Remember, politicians are only slightly smarter than the people who elected them.

      not likely and what a weird thing to say.

      --
      http://www.mrbrklyn.com/amsterdam.html http://www.brooklyn-living.com
    14. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deal with it snowflake.

      FYI - This insult is lame. Makes me think youre a late-to-the-game loser.

      It was originally used by 4chan and right wingers as an insult to lefties who promoted safe spaces and all that weak crap.

      Lefties said it was a dumb insult, then they started using it like they invented it (oblig. digression: what happened to the left's creativity??).

      The insult isnt so out of fashion that it's cool again.... it's just out of fashion.

    15. Re: I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, bullshit? I am a good welder and I'm proficient in all processes. I fell for this lie in early aught and it was terrible.

      In 10 years I was active in the trade I never met a welder who made close to $50/hr besides underwater welders. That includes boilermakers (including nukes), ironworkers, steelworkers, and pipefitters.
        Maybe if you add up the total compensation of union joiners, but not their cash wage.

      That's assuming that welders are even working. I remember in between '07-'10 it was almost impossible to get a job in the trade that paid $25/hr... "6G TIG on aluminum tubing? $11/hr take it or leave it."

      Fuck, even the local shop here only charges $75/hr and they even have a decent machine shop.

    16. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you are complaining that US healthcare is expensive, while your daughter is going to school to make that sweet healthcare money and you don't want her to do something that pays less or is more dangerous.

      What's the problem? You are getting exactly what you want.

    17. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you are the problem. You could have just bypassed what you don't like but instead you throw a fit.

    18. Re:I gotta be honest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And an even worse troll. Shut the fuck up already.

  5. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Stay on Breitbard and Der Sturmer, nazi scumbags. You have 100% right to speak your mind there within the confines of law. You have 0% of a right to be a nazi on anyone's platform. That's how this works, they own their platform. Blow.

    Deal with it snowflake nazis, scatter back behind the fridge where you belong, deplorable cockroaches. America doesn't censor you, society does - for good reason, you are un-American uneducated scumbags of no value to society.

  6. I decry Ellen Pao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ellen Pao made a mess of it. Ever since, she's has been trying to portrait herself as a victim. -She- made a mess of it.

  7. Re:Which former Reddit CEO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "CEO of Reddit"

    No point in reading any further.

  8. Time to put up, then by HarryCaul · · Score: 1

    He should donate all the money he made from the rage-fest that is Reddit, then. I'd suggest a charity that assists victims of the poison reddit has spread.

    1. Re:Time to put up, then by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The summary was very careful not to mention her by name, but without reading the article, I can guarantee this is Reddit Ex-CEO Ellen Pao. The person who fought long and hard for censorship to the point of nearly destroying the most popular internet forum in the world.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re: Time to put up, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was her job. The rumor is she did what the normal reddit ceo didn't want to take flak for.

    3. Re:Time to put up, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's called editorial control. Nobody owes you a free website to rant on. If you want full editorial control, host one yourself. Censorship is when the government does it, not when a private company purges shitty content that actually makes people want to use their service less.

  9. Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hate speech is not free speech. This has been decided in the courts. Other speech has consequences. For example shouting "FIRE!" in a crowded theater. Or speech that incites others to violent acts or riot.

    It is clear that the CEOs of Fakebook and TWITter among others do not care about trying to eliminate hate speech and speech that incites to violence, any more than they care about trying to eliminate fake news from their platforms. All that they really care about is how much personal info that they can collect and sell, and how many ads they can sell. In other words, its all about the money!!

    1. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hate speech is not free speech. This has been decided in the courts.

      Uhh, what?
      Courts have CONSISTANTLY ruled the opposite of what you said.
      Matal v. Tam, and United States v. Schwimmer especially

      Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express "the thought that we hate".

    2. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communists are a clear and present danger to the US. I have contacted the police. You should turn yourself in to prevent the act of violence upon yourself.

    3. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      For example shouting "FIRE!" in a crowded theater.

      You might want to read the history of this analogy. It was first used by Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. His reasoning was that obviously the government had the power to arrest someone for shouting fire in a theater, so, hey, it was also okay for the government to arrest people for speaking out against the WW1 draft. Totally the same thing.

      So the defendants went to prison, where they were beaten and abused. Some of them died there.

      So using stupid analogies to justify political censorship has a long history.

      Later in his life, Oliver Wendell Holmes said this ruling was one of his biggest regrets.

      Shouting fire in a crowded theater

      Schenck v. United States

    4. Re: Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater analogy" is the new Godwin's Law, I swear.

      So tired if hearing/seeing it.

    5. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So exactly what are you saying then ? That people should have the right to yell FIRE! in a theater ? That we should not prosecute in any way, shape or form someone who does this, even when this creates a panic and people die ?

      Answer that simple question once and for all. Is that what you're saying ? Or will you just evade the question, like 100% of the people I've asked this simple question to before ?

    6. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2, Informative

      So exactly what are you saying then ? That people should have the right to yell FIRE! in a theater ?

      Of course not. I am saying that equating "yelling fire in a theater" with "hate speech", as the GPP was doing, is idiotic.

      How is allowing Ann Coulter to speak on campus harming anyone? Being offended is not "harm".

      As an aside, I can't understand why liberals want to silence Ann Coulter. I can't imagine a better spokesperson for any cause that I despise.

    7. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hate speech is not free speech. This has been decided in the courts.

      Exactly. That's why there's that scene in the Blues Brothers where the Illinois Nazi's are all going to jail just when Jake Blues is getting out. Such a great scene.

      Or maybe my memory is faulty? It could have been a scene, based on real life events in Skoki Illinois where the Nazi's won their court case, and are marching. Then The Blues Brothers run them all down and they're forced to jump off a bridge.

      I'm guessing it's the latter, since it was based on real events, not imaginary events where "hate speech" is illegal.

    8. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FALSELY yelling fire in a crowded theater might open the speak to liability, IF someone believes them and if someone is harmed by that belief.

      But's it's the fraud that is being punished, not the speech. Honestly yelling fire is never liable, and in fact failing to yell fire may make you liable, if there was a fire.

      The legal trend is clear - only clear and immediate threats are punishable. Only commercial fraud, or defamation, is punishable. All other speech - specially political and personal speech - is essential to the liberty of a free people.

    9. Re: Hate speech is not free speech. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      That people should have the right to yell FIRE! in a theater ?

      You DO have that right. Whether or not it's criminal depends entirely on the context. The only time such speech is restricted is when it's both false, malicious, and likely to cause immediate harm. If there's an actual fire, you can yell fire. If you're on actor on stage and have to yell fire as part of the performance, you can yell fire. If you make it obvious to everyone that you're joking, you can yell fire. If you see smoke and assume that there's a fire, but there isn't, you can yell fire.

      This is why it's a shit analogy for "hate speech". The vast majority of what people classify under that label fails at least one of the required criteria, if not all of them. The only time that "hate speech" really isn't protected as free speech is when it involves a direct, immediate call to action. As in "Look over there, its a $slur! Go fuck him up!".

    10. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Falos · · Score: 1

      >That people should have the right to yell FIRE! in a theater?
      They do. Speech is protected.

      >even when this creates a panic
      Endangering human life isn't.

      I'll explain The Point like you're five: This means you don't have an example of "special category speech". It happens to be lumped with an incidental offense.

      Still too many big words? Consider that the same speech is fine in an empty theater. The problem isn't the speech.

    11. Re: Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater analogy" is the new Godwin's Law, I swear.

      So tired if hearing/seeing it.

      You don't want to shut it down. It is very useful to identify the shit stupid among us who would want to remove our rights to free speech.

    12. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're an a-hole doesn't make everyone else who wants civil discourse a Communist.

    13. Re: Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a society, we lock people up who don't play nice. So, why don't you play nice instead?

    14. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate speech is not the same thing as free speech, but it is most certainly Constitutionally protected speech under the Constitution except in the most narrow of circumstances that present a clear and present danger. https://www.thoughtco.com/hate-speech-cases-721215
           

    15. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by fafalone · · Score: 2

      How the hell is this modded insightful? Are this many /.ers really ignorant of the fact hate speech is absolutely free speech and that courts have ruled it's protected? No court has ruled hate speech is unprotected. Incitement does not cover hate speech in general, and comparing it to (falsly) shouting fire is beyond idiotic.
      Private websites are absolutely free to ban whatever they consider hate speech to be from their platforms, but it's protected speech the government cannot punish you for.

    16. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Money is speech, can I pay someone to kill you freely. Sure they can be punished for the killing but do I not have a right to free speech, to pay money, as means of expressing my feelings about you.

      Free speech, is the freedom to express your opinion and not the freedom to say anything you want say.

      Here is a tricky one, give your word in court but wait speech should be free, so how can I be bound by it. Why would my word have any value when by law it should be free how do you legally bind someone to their word if speech is free.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has ever declared that money is speech.
      What the government cannot do is stifle your speech by preventing you from spending money to get your message out to other people. Just like they can't restrict your speech to an empty sound-proof room.

      No right is absolute - you can sign away parts of your free-speech rights by signing a contract, for example. False advertising is fraud that harms consumers, and is restricted because of that harm. Similarly, imminent threats or incitement of immediate harm are restricted. You cannot lie in court because the right to a fair trial overrides your right to free speech in that specific, limited, instance.

      In all other cases, then yes - Freedom of Speech does mean you can say whatever you want.

    18. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Hate speech is not free speech. This has been decided in the courts

      Wrong again, shithead. They decided there is no such thing as """hate speech""". Do you even bother to do research before you spew your bullshit everywhere?

    19. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So exactly what are you saying then ? That people should have the right to yell FIRE! in a theater ? That we should not prosecute in any way, shape or form someone who does this, even when this creates a panic and people die ?

      Answer that simple question once and for all. Is that what you're saying ? Or will you just evade the question, like 100% of the people I've asked this simple question to before ?

      I really doubt that 100% of people have evaded the question - it's pretty clear from the way you come across that a fair old percentage of people would just sock you in the kisser and move swiftly on.

    20. Re: Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democrat party trolls sure do love the Gulag.

    21. Re:Hate speech is not free speech. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a theory I've heard running around that it's most often false protestors trying to shut down conservative speakers at colleges. The reality is that it would be a huge embarrassment if not a single person showed up out of a campus of 2000 to hear them speak; the alternative is to pay some instigators to "protest" and thus raise more "awareness" instead of admitting that literally nobody cares about their message. We have proven that Milo Yiannopolous has used this method before his sudden fall out of the limelight, and then it suddenly becomes popular? The evidence points strongly towards this.

  10. US citizens held accountable for bill of rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, Xi Jinping, charge you with the crime of loving freedom. OH FOR SHAME

  11. Ellen Palo changed her name to âoeFormer Redd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her name is nowhere listed in this article description. Really?

  12. Re:In Other Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to decide: either Liberals or Nazis. The Nazis says they ain't Liberals and the Liberals say they ain't Nazis.
    You say "we". Who do you mean? The Idiots? you definitely a member.

  13. The Pao crusade continues by TimothyHollins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm guessing chairman Pao would be much happier with the Chinese model. They do after all censor all the social media for "positive impact" and "protecting a small subset of users".

    It must be difficult to be so smart that you feel a responsibility of governing the lives of every human being on the planet.

    1. Re:The Pao crusade continues by Jeremi · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing chairman Pao would be much happier with the Chinese model. They do after all censor all the social media for "positive impact" and "protecting a small subset of users".

      Are those really the only two possibilities, totalitarian censorship or horrifying trollscape? With all the ingenuity of Silicon Valley and the rest of mankind, and that's all we can come up with?

      I think we can do better; the biggest obstacle to finding a better solution is the belief that one does not exist.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously? You're equating New Jersey native Ellen Pao with Mao and Chinese censorship? How racist is that exactly? Can I get a judge's score?

      You're just proving her point, genius.

      How about instead of ridiculous name-calling and straw men you actually contribute to the conversation? There's no need to immediately pretend you're outraged and trot out extremist views as if they were fact.

      It's not like Pao is making some earth-shattering discovery here, money talks. How about personal responsibility and accountability come to the table, too?

    3. Re: The Pao crusade continues by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously? You're equating New Jersey native Ellen Pao with Mao and Chinese censorship? How racist is that exactly? Can I get a judge's score?

      This is why everyone hates SJWs.

    4. Re: The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For calling out obviously stupid comments that are racist as a bonus?

    5. Re:The Pao crusade continues by atriusofbricia · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing chairman Pao would be much happier with the Chinese model. They do after all censor all the social media for "positive impact" and "protecting a small subset of users".

      Are those really the only two possibilities, totalitarian censorship or horrifying trollscape? With all the ingenuity of Silicon Valley and the rest of mankind, and that's all we can come up with?

      I think we can do better; the biggest obstacle to finding a better solution is the belief that one does not exist.

      This isn't something that can or should be fixed with technology or silencing the opposition. Myself, I don't think "hate speech" should be banned. When one bans something like that one doesn't actually make it go away, all one does is drive it underground. The correct and only workable solution is to confront it and destroy it on equal footing. If the posters of such speech truly have no real value, they will be driven out. Can one change the minds of the propagators of such things? Probably not. Though, that wouldn't be the point. One doesn't argue against such to change their minds, but to hopefully change the minds of anyone listening and banning such doesn't have a chance of doing that.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    6. Re: The Pao crusade continues by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      For being humorless cunts who try to ruin everything.

    7. Re:The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please go learn what "free speech" means. A private company is under zero obligation to create a safe space for snowflakes like you.

    8. Re: The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they own you, got it.

    9. Re:The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Difference: that's the government. This is a private company. Host your own site if you want editorial control – private companies don't owe you their resources or platform, which they govern, because the company is theirs and not yours.

    10. Re:The Pao crusade continues by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Are those really the only two possibilities, totalitarian censorship or horrifying trollscape?

      It seems that some people will only be satisfied with "free speech" when every internet forum is nothing buy anonymous trolls barking racial slurs at eah other 24/7.

      Myself, I don't think "hate speech" should be banned. When one bans something like that one doesn't actually make it go away, all one does is drive it underground.

      I hear this argument a lot, I don't buy it (assuming we're not talking about the government banning it). Giving something a platform also gives it legitimacy.

      The correct and only workable solution is to confront it and destroy it on equal footing.

      You cannot rationally rebut a position which is based on irrationality. The kind of people who believe there is a cabal of Jewish bankers running the world acting t odestroy their civilisation are not going to be swayed by any facts, any evidence or anything remotely sane.

      If the posters of such speech truly have no real value, they will be driven out.

      That's not how humans work.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    11. Re: The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you post your own site when every access point to the internet is owned by a private company that could choose to censor you?

    12. Re: The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has race to do with this?
      The point is about Ellen Pao's personality/thoughts (which don't originate from her race), and behavior of a regime (which isn't based/rooted in some race).
      Yes, they both kinda have races, just like most things (made out of) animals/plants.
      And in this case they might be of the same race(?), but that's not relevant to the point.
      Or how are Ellen Pao's and/or the Chinese government's _actions_, that are the subject of discussion, related to their respective races?
      And yes, people that see racism where there isn't any, yet don't see how they themselves are the ones that make people's race more important than their actions (what's the term for that again?), and introduce it into the conversation seemingly without cause, are often hated.

    13. Re: The Pao crusade continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's funny to call mild conservatives Nazis just to see how flustered they get. Those humorless cunts can't take a joke apparently, and have to ruin everything.

  14. Shut up Ellen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Article summary doesn't even mention the name of the former Reddit CEO, but I'm guessing its Ellen Pao, right?

  15. Re:Which former Reddit CEO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can just mouse over the link and the URL tells you it's Ellen Pao

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_Pao

    She's controversial outside of anything Reddit related, especially her gender discrimination suit against another former employer that to an outside observer looked a lot like extortion.

  16. Shitcock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free speach bitches!

  17. Rage, Rage against Rage by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    It's nice to be able to blame others when you no longer have any influence or financial interest on social media.

    It would also be very beneficial for users of social media to never be passionate about issues because a sedated, non-controversial flock are very cheap and easy to wrangle.

    Financial interests are all that matters to the owners of social media sites. If it didn't cause an outcry (more work) they probably would be running Trump/Nazi/Erectile Medication ads on every page of their sites.

    1. Re:Rage, Rage against Rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Financial interests are all that matters to the owners of social media sites.

      The problem is not that social media owners and well a lot of businesses seem mostly interested first, middle, and last to the bottom line.

      The problem is the rest of us choose to do business with people like that while bemoaning that we can do nothing.

      People want to buy a product, be it a physical one, or a political one, and they don't seem to give a damn how that product is made. Sure some may care, but I don't think it is a majority.

      Power ultimately comes from the consent of the governed, though if the people fail to do their job adequately on their watch, then it becomes harder to fix, but never truly impossible. The costs, may, however, be sky high.

  18. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You do realize that the number of actual Nazis in the US is barely measurable? What we do have is a bunch of hateful people that decide to just label people as Nazis as a way to claim the moral high ground and suppress those with ideological, but mainstream differences. Oddly enough, it was the Nazis who used the tactic of calling their opponents less than human, deplorable, cockroaches who were the root for all that was wrong in order to get the general populace to go along with treating them as scum who should not be associated with and ultimately to purge. Very much like the far left is currently doing to conservatives. There may be some dictionary differences between Nazis and the groups of antifa, democratic socialists and progressives, but the tactics to usurp power have very common traits.

  19. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fair point, the "actual" nazism just requires more of an intentional break from society and reality. Most people are cows to the slaughter, where nazis are like rotten meat advocating for a less sanitary abattoir.

    We need a nazi roundup and mass execution, it will probably end up happening one way or another. They're too stupid to keep their heads down, the retarded backwoods uneducated traitors. We'll get them all eventually.

  20. Uh oh...more removing stuff coming by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's see...you can make threats all you want about Trump, conservatives, republicans, Christians, traditional values, and no one bats an eye on social media. But, say one thing about liberals, homosexuals, blacks, illegal aliens and you get banned. That sound about right? Freedom...ain't it great? Granted, Fakebook, twitter et al, are technically a private business, and they can have a TOS as they see fit, but they better watch out banning this or that, or the long arm of the federal government will come down on them and destroy their profitable business. Because, we all know when government gets involved, it turns into a cluster f*ck!

    1. Re:Uh oh...more removing stuff coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      ^ The trolls have taken over here...

      Slashdot is a cesspool of idiocy these days.

    2. Re:Uh oh...more removing stuff coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put down your meth and crack pipe you redneck piece of shit. Plenty of people talk shit about both sides.

      You are what is wrong with this fucking country you piece of trash.

    3. Re:Uh oh...more removing stuff coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see...you can make threats all you want about Trump, conservatives, republicans, Christians, traditional
      values, and no one bats an eye on social media.
      But, say one thing about liberals, homosexuals, blacks, illegal aliens and you get banned.
      That sound about right?
      Freedom...ain't it great?
      Granted, Fakebook, twitter et al, are technically a private business, and they can have a TOS as they see fit,
      but they better watch out banning this or that, or the long arm of the federal government will come down on them
      and destroy their profitable business. Because, we all know when government gets involved, it turns into a cluster f*ck!

      It's a shame - you're on the verge of an insight, but it's eluding you. Let me spell it out for you: Extreme right-wing shit is real bad for business and you live in a capitalist society. You will be thrown under a bus not by the people you consider enemies, but the people who you think are your friends - the Bushes and the Kochs of this world. You're costing them money and they're going to fucking kill you for it. It's entirely possible that you will die in a gulag or concentration camp for your ruggedly individual all-American beliefs, but it's the republicans that will actually put you there.

  21. Holding hands on the road to freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We must hold our founding fathers accountable.

  22. CEO who? by MrLint · · Score: 0

    I can't think of any other tech article in which a former exec is reference and the name not the submitted /. post. Of course in this case it was Ex-CEO Ellen Pao

  23. Rich from the mass producer of echo chambers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you post something on Reddit in a community that doesn't like it:

    ) it will immediately be downvoted
    2) because it's downvoted, it will be invisible to virtually everyone
    3) you also get punished in terms of "karma score" system for posting in unfavorable communities

    The result is communities that are echo chambers, where you find likeminded people and you all hi-five each other constantly and vote each other up, and downvote opposite voices. Those opposite voices eventually get tired of putting their best effort into writing stuff nobody reads, and leave. It was designed as an echo chamber.

  24. Forgot to mention Ellen Pao's name in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how Pao's name was conspicuously missing in that entire post.

    It's almost like people wouldn't respect her opinion if they knew who it was coming from... Hrmm, why would that be?

    1. Re:Forgot to mention Ellen Pao's name in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's the one who wrote the article. Her name is right at the top.

  25. Re: In Other Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone needs to stop categorizing people so we can get things done

  26. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You're absolute correct, but you forgot to apply the other slices of bread to the shit sandwich, the "Christian conservative" far right.

    Seriously... It's really, really sad listening to the two parties argue over who's the biggest victim. Part of me wishes you'd just kiss and make up and another part wants to give you all a broken bottle and watch you kill each other off, but that'd never happen because you're just too goddamn pathetic.

    What you'll do is lobby your representatives to pass limp, symbolic legislation targeted at your adversaries that'll just be overturned in 4-8 years...

  27. She'd be happy now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Of late, Reddit has just banned a bunch of random accounts because they're Iranian bots, apparently, colluding to drive narratives to specific ends.

    They were clearly successful, given the accounts (before being wiped) had histories of posting literally all over the political spectrum, on a wide variety of topics, the majority of which had nothing to do whatsoever with politics or geopolitical issues.

    Meanwhile, of course, any Redditor can tell you of the massive and weird shift of one of Reddit's most popular subreddits, politics, underwent: before Bernie bro'd out, the sub made even diehard Trumpers look like saints in terms of vitriol spewed towards Clinton. As Bernie was being knocked out? Might've been the second coming of Jeebus, given the amount of inane fanfare for Clinton. What happened? Simple. A group (several, actually) worked in concert to take over the subreddit and drive their narrative.

    I have no problem with that in itself; what's damning is the fact that some people get a pass, while others get a, "REEEEEEEEEEE BOTS NARRATIVE PROPAGANDA!"

    But of course, silencing political foes while letting your friends do as they wish is what the Party is all about. Pao wasn't the originator of the Reddit Thought Police, but she moved them along briskly, and they're still picking up speed - one only needs to listen, not even carefully, and the intermission between jackboots hitting pavement is ever decreasing.

  28. Slashdot System by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me like this problem of allowing free speech while keeping the general public away from toxic posts was solved ages ago by Slashdot and it's system of moderation and meta-moderation. If only other sites would adopt the system.....

    1. Re:Slashdot System by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

      was solved ages ago by Slashdot and it's system of moderation and meta-moderation. If only other sites would adopt the system.....

      No, slashdot over the last 10-20 years has been on a huge decline, I rarely if ever see truth based posts about US politics for instance. (aka if you are voting for any rightwing party you are too stupid to understand what the bank bailouts meant in 2008). Our whole species is just stupid, no amount of moderation can cure that level of stupidity. Slashdot suffers from popularity as much as any other site because newer generations of kids and 20 somethings don't have the same experience as the best informed among the older generation and they get downvoted.

      I'l give you an example from the videogame industry watched for the last 20 years as videogames were literally stolen once high speed internet penetration reached critical mass around 2005-2006, and the software you control inversion began as a rise of the masses of internet and smart phone connected idiots came online.

      The rise of drm, mmo's, f2p games, steam are all signs that our species is a race of morons from all walks and classe of life. The fact that something like world of warcraft can even exist even though that was one of the trial balloons to normalize software you don't own an part of the evil plot to take games out of gamers hands. The entire industry won hands down because they know the literate PC gamers can't reach their offices they are now trapped 100+ miles away from the business and have no market power, now we got shit like League of legends and fortnite, people paying for shit they don't own inside a game they don't own because they are fucking morons.

      A giant wtf. I watched my hobby be literally destroyed, level editors and SDK's we got in the 90's literally disappear and were massively curtailed. All the textures and models people are "paying for" are on their computer already, the program just sets a flag to display it. We truly live in a world of morons. Just try insulting steam or mmo's and watch the mmo mouthbreathing brigade come out and downvote you. People who can't reason themselves out of a wet paper bag.

      And CEO's pushing for the end game of software files they stream encrypted from servers form their office for all AAA games eventually going foward.

      https://www.techspot.com/news/...

    2. Re:Slashdot System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't play those games, the indie-game-dev scene (as well as the modding scene) is bigger than it's ever been

  29. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > You have 0% of a right to be a nazi on anyone's platform. That's how this works, they own their platform. Blow.

    Looking forward to revisiting this gem of a post in another decade or two when China and India control the major platforms and decide to ban things insulting to Hindus or deemed subversive to the state.

  30. The really high paying stuff is by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the stuff that makes the median income look good is underwater welding. It's crazy dangerous. Do it wrong and you blow up.

    $50k year isn't a lot of money any more. And you'll live in the middle of nowhere on oil fields to get it. That's fine when you're 18 and drive 3 hours into town every weekend. Not when you're 25 and want kids (and schools for said kids).

    Also, wages for welders aren't going up but inflation _is_. The only people who's livelihoods aren't being eaten alive by inflation are folks with STEM degrees, especially Medical.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  31. Yep by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    and the high pay for underwater welding skews the figures on income for welders. Most welders make $15-$18/hr. In 2018 that's not a middle class life. That's a bare minimum living wage and you better hope you never get sick or injured...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In most of the US, $30,000 to $36,000 dollars a year IS middle-class. Lower middle class, sure, but certainly not poor.

      Try moving out of San Francisco and New York. Move to states where the taxes are less than 10%, and where housing prices are around $100K. That's the VAST majority of the country, the "flyover" parts that ignorant people like you deride and avoid.

  32. i know welder on disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welding is no no way shape or form, safe. it could be safe but the way things work in most corporations that hire welders, they force them to work in unsafe conditions.

  33. You can stop reading when by Snufu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    an author puts "free speech" in quotes.

    1. Re:You can stop reading when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "free speech" is a limited right that may include things besides vocalizations or written words. Get over it snowflake, hiding from writings won't keep Trump out of prison either.

    2. Re: You can stop reading when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your use of the term snowflake a dogwhistle?

    3. Re:You can stop reading when by hmadrone · · Score: 1

      The First Amendment to the US Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech." It says nothing about private companies like Facebook, Twitter, or Google making policies about the type of speech they want to allow on their platforms. "Free speech" does belong in quotes when what people mean is that a private concern declines to provide a platform for a particular type of speech. It's like crying censorship because a bookstore declines to carry a particular magazine. You might not like the policies of the bookstore or the social media company, but they're not abridging anyone's rights by refusing to spread certain content.

      Prior to starting Slack, Stewart Butterfield worked on a social-engineering-project-masquerading-as-a-game called Glitch. He was trying to figure out how to encourage pro-social behavior among players, and he did a pretty good job of it. Ellen Pao thinks that social networking companies should do something similar -- figure out how to promote community-building behavior on their platforms. Mailing list and forum moderators have often tried to encourage practices that build good online communities. Why shouldn't they? If you're going to devote your time and energy into an online community, you want it to be one you're going to enjoy.

      Online platforms are never going to be value neutral. Like it or not, social media platforms encourage some forms of behavior and discourage others. Social engineering is very much part of the puzzle.

    4. Re:You can stop reading when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... author puts "free speech" in quotes.

      Yeah, or least, it should be single quotes because it's not a direct copy of something else. Then it would be correct because Facebook is censored. Laws ban bare breasts, religious and government talking heads ban sex. Anti-fa (a pro-authoritarian group) and other SJWs ban everything right-wing that didn't come from Fox News. That allows defamation, violence and what Kim Kardashian did yesterday, on a Facebook wall.

    5. Re:You can stop reading when by rundgong · · Score: 1

      Your comment started out pretty interesting, but I stopped reading when I saw "free speech" in quotes so I'm not sure what point you were trying to make...

    6. Re:You can stop reading when by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      It's completely appropriate. Speech always has and always had limits, even limits set in law. Even in the United States.

      Anyone who think that free speech is something that is an unqualified absolute right is an idiot. Period.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    7. Re:You can stop reading when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We live in a world where people's access to communicate is increasingly dictated by corporations. So what happens if Google, Microsoft, Facebook, etc. all get together and no longer allow you to express a certain political view on their platform. For example, maybe they all want to do business with China, and China decides that any company doing business with it must censor all discussions of the Hong Kong independence movement. Prohibiting people speaking about such a topic might be a good business decision for them. To me, this scenario is a much bigger risk than the harms of online harassment. So we should try to seek to stop giving these businesses power over our communications as soon as businesses start telling us which political opinions we are allowed or not allowed to present. The former CEO of Reddit, on the other hand, hopes that businesses move to control the speech on their platforms so that it advances her views.

  34. The Nazi Whining Breitbart crybaby act continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're free to post your unreasonable defense of a traitor on Breitbart or Sturmer or anywhere nazis do their faggot act, but you have no "right" to be a cowardly traitor pushing nazism on Twitter or Reddit, anywhere else.

    This is because those are free-market companies. They own their platforms and don't have to allow cowardly nazi faggot shit to make it less usable or enjoyable to normal patriotic citizens. They don't need you. Nobody does.

    So you cockroaches are free to scatter back to the cracks and crevices your uneducated ideology was excreted from, but you have no rights to be cunts on "social media" that you don't own. Sorry, but that's OUR system, snowflake.

    When Reddit says Pao decides, Pao decides. Deal with it, fuck off back to your nazi shitholes. Your kind isn't welcome in civil society. We reject you cowards with the extreme prejudice you preach directly.

  35. Shanghai Moron says all kinds of garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welding involves vaporizing toxic chemicals about 1 foot from your face. It emits UV and in fact Xray radiation. It involves moderately high power levels at one's fingertips, in the rain, upside down, any configuration possible. You're a moron.

    Yes, it's dangerous, and yes you're a shitty welder making obsequious commentaries you know very little about generally.

  36. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tolerant liberal.

  37. Something else I forgot to mention by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    welders often have a ton of nasty health problems in their 50s and 60s from decades of breathing vaporized metal. There are ways to alleviate the problem but, well, the mostly require gov't intervention or companies don't bother and we just put a party in charge that's deeply opposed to gov't intervention...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Something else I forgot to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because during the 8 years of both clinton and obama, they seemed to try really hard to mandate breathing apparatus for welders..... oh wait....

  38. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tolerating Nazis is known as an appeasement. I am not for that. My grandfather murdered nazi scum by hand and I hope to be given the chance to follow in his patriotic and life-loving footsteps. Nazism is the enemy of America.

    If you support it expect to die. Don't be confused thinking my liberal social values extend to treasonous nazi faggot scumbags. You will die.

  39. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have liberal values. You're the fascist you claim to oppose. Or you're just a crapflooder.

  40. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you are being honest and acknowledging that Christian conservatives are the bread in the shit sandwich.

  41. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the purpose of these platforms.
    Look at 4chan. The whole purpose is to have people yelling and insulting each other.
    This is what people want.
    The mistake was coupling this to real world identities. Not having people be able to troll and flame.

  42. Re: The Nazi Whining Breitbart crybaby act continu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please cut out the crapflooding. Nobody could conceivably think your post was serious.

  43. commentsubject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    road to hell

    internet fights

    Based on the available evidence, either (A) drama queen hyperbole*, does not compute (B) /. is the fifth circle of hell

    *which I might try to solve with ridicule or mockery, but not by trying to "hold websites accountable". This fecal smear on my screen isn't particularly Dice's fault.

    Besides her right to ragefully rant, I also acknowledge the possibility that she was right all along and we're living in simulated reality (B).

  44. is this about something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than promoting the idea that speech is something adults need to be "protected" from?

    Did I miss a point in there somewhere?

  45. ekp and reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to shower now. Filth talking shit about a sewer.

  46. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a plot of rage-fueled anger Anon. You sure youâ(TM)re not projecting?

  47. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, fascism implies complicity with the state. In this case the state is represented by Trump, an all but avowed nazi. I don't preach racial superiority either way, that's retarded phenotypism in a genotype world.
    Support nazism = you're a nazi. Period. Do not pass go, Die in Federal Prison, you are a traitor if you support nazism. (and a moron)

    And nazis should expect death like they preach towards other groups, oh yes the fuck you should. That's not fascism, that's a natural reaction to nazism. Deal with it nazi snowflake faggots. The world will not appease you.

  48. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    Good luck scraping the shit off either of those.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  49. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all. Just "duh".

  50. Hypocrisy, thy name is Ellen. by mukinrestak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The title pretty much sums it up, Ellen Pao trying to shit on other social media CEOs is possibly the most hypocritical thing I've ever seen. She is not only part of the problem but a prime source of it.

    1. Re:Hypocrisy, thy name is Ellen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems she wants those CEOs to have the same oppression agenda as herself.
      Hipocrisy is when you accuse others of something you do yourself, which is not the case AFAICS.

  51. Re:Which former Reddit CEO? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She wasn't "controversial". She was straight up bigoted and consistently lied and extorted people as a matter of policy. On reddit and off reddit.

  52. Engineering Answer: It Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (parents assertion:) Hate speech is not free speech.

    As my professors taught me, the good engineering answer is "It Depends". I hate people like you who accuse all "Hate speech" of not being Free Speech. See that last sentence there, it was FUCKING BOTH YOU STUPID SHITHEAD.

    Now go watch the movie "The Jerk". Then listen to some Bill Hicks albums. Then listen to Ice T's "Cop Killer" album.

    People who equivicate "Hate speech" with logical-not of Free Speech are absolutely fucking traitors. God gave me some inalienable rights. Good Luck taking them from me.

    Take some advice please- "The Devil Is In The Details". "It Depends". There are enemies of Free Speech. People who feel the need to expand laws against threats of violence, and weakly use the imprecise "Hate speech" label as sweepingly wrongly as you did, are enemies of Free Speech. Free Speech matters a lot.

  53. Venting by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    What's the main problem? Trolls having twisted fun? The borderline-insane who make death threats against women and minorities? Far right/left? I'd rather the extremists were out in the open, so that their ill-considered arguments could be shot down. If anyone crosses a line then they get the full force of the law or the site... same as they would in real life - call that censorship but I prefer the word 'responsibility'. As for trolls - I'd rather they were mucking about on the web than setting fire to bus-stops and shooting cats.

  54. Re: In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    Ahh, so you were only a Nazi when Obama was in office. I got what you're saying now. By the way, if you grandfather saw this side of you he would probably disown you.

  55. Context matters by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm angry for a reason. I'm not just raging to rage. I'm not some 20 year old with too much testosterone.

    My point is the rage of the working class is being largely ignored. It's how we got a proto-dictator like Trump (and yes, I will call him a proto-dictator. He praised Kim Jon Un's people standing in attention and President Xi of China granting himself the presidency for life). I call out Pelosi because she's one of the ones ignoring me.

    Everything _is_ politics. Everything we do and think has broad implications on society as a whole, even the really stupid stuff, when it's scaled up to a national level. When you ignore the working class getting the crap beaten out of them sooner or later they're going to do something to fix that. If we're lucky we get sound policy (hey, it happened in Europe). If we're not we get dictatorships and war. Now's the time to choose which one.

    But Hey, go right on dismissing all this as "just politics" like it doesn't matter. Right up until it bites us all in the ass, hard.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Context matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron, working class rage at being ignored is what got Trump elected. Man you're clueless....

    2. Re: Context matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't you have problems

  56. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how this works, they own their platform.

    Exactly! Anyway, back to the topic of dictating what others are obligated to do with their own platform...

  57. Re-read my post by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that was the entire point.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  58. Re:In Other Words NAZIS NOT WELCOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering there are over 5,000 known, admitted Nazi-esque groups (Nazis, Fascists, white nationalists, any far right identity politics party basically) and each group likely has at least two members, there are at least 10,000 in the US. One of the requirements to become a Nazi (or any other far right ideology) is an extreme gullibility and less than average intellect. To become a Nazi, one must be willing to believe known lies and pretend reality is completely different than how we measure it. To become a Nazi basically means you are proofed against rational debate; the grounds for said debate have been completely removed, so the only hope a Nazi has is for reality to teach them. When Nazis can escape reality by living online in their forums, they can avoid the lessons reality tries to teach them.

    It's a real problem.

  59. Well, they should censor this crap by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    And there is precedent...

    Remember newspapers, when they were not merely cage lining or, now, superseded by online whatever?

    Remember the editorial page? Letters to the Editor?

    There was a time when editors and/or their staff did indeed read those letters. All of them, even the rants and threats. But they would not publish them if these writers crossed a line. Editorial staff might even let the police know.

    So, Twitter etc, somewhat the modern, Internet version of Letters to the Editor, permits this spew. Maybe they should not. Maybe they should do what newspapers did, back when we more successfully pretended to be a civil society, and simply drop these upon inspection.

    Certainly a reasonable filter would include spotting posts with plain physical threats, for instance, and discard them. Those old Letters to the Editor did that, and no one was the wiser.

    And if these sad individuals demand a forum, they can do what they did back then, when newspapers ruled, and publish themselves. Some did.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.