Slashdot Mirror
Rice University Says Middle-Class And Low-Income Students Won't Have To Pay Tuition (npr.org)
Rice University is "dramatically expanding" its financial aid offerings, promising full scholarships to undergrads whose families have income under $130,000. NPR reports: The school says it wants to reduce student debt -- and make it easier for students from low-income families to attend. "Talent deserves opportunity," Rice President David Leebron said while announcing the plan on Tuesday. The full scholarships are earmarked for students whose families have income between $65,000 and $130,000. Below that level, the university will not only cover tuition but also provide grants to cover students' room and board, along with any other fees. Another part of the program will help students whose family income surpasses the maximum: If their family's income is between $130,000 and $200,000, they can still get grants covering at least half of their tuition.
That seems strange to me.
The trend lately is for colleges to set a ridiculously high price, then give "everyone" a discount. They're taking as much as they can from everyone. In what other field do companies get away with that? What a scam.
Cause not educating the poor cause it cost money is the morally right thing to do.
The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
How about lowering the actual cost of education to begin with? Maybe a few less new buildings, staff positions, student outreach initiatives...
"it's easy to spend other people's money" = Republicanism in a nutshell
If your family is pulling in $130,000 and you can't afford an education then the problem's in the Universities.
Maybe those $100 million sports facilities and plasma TVs in every bedroom aren't really needed.
No sig today...
Do you work for free?
Germany has had such a system for decades, and is the power house of Europe.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
As opposed to hiring the kid who just happened to be born to a well-off family? What did that child do to earn his Silver platter?
I pick up trash on the street and in the park when I go walking, I help old people cross the street, I call for help when I see someone who needs it. Am I a socialist now? Or is socialism part of society since forever, and you're nuts?
Rice is a private institution so not socialist because it isn't the government. If you are dirt poor they are using their money to cover your tuition. Lots of elite schools do this, hell one of my cousins got into to Brandeis University's economics program and didn't pay a dime for tuition with his parents being a teacher and a physical therapist. What you fail to understand is that elite schools want the best and brightest to graduate from their school even if they are poor. This means that the degrees for the rich fucks who can't find their ass with both hands who also graduate from there are respected.
Time to offend someone
You're a grumpy-pants because you're angry about how hard you've had to work for your success? Angry that other people don't have to work as hard for theirs?
Is the goal of life to work hard, or to achieve "success," ask yourself!
Just because you agree with the "traditional" workings of a system that chooses to harshly ignore our easily-achieved-in-this-day "success" of the people (i.e. abundance, health, nourishment, safety, etc.), FOR EVERYONE, WITH LITTLE RELIANCE ON GRUELING HUMAN INPUT, doesn't weigh up to shit except for that you agree with something you experienced.
Sadly enough, your anger and resentment for your own suffering within this system blinds you to its non-necessity. You wish that others will have to have the same pain you did, otherwise they don't deserve the favorable conditions you toiled for yourself.
Wake the fuck up everyone. Everyone can be taken care of. Money is a sham and most of it is taken away from you. We need to move past post-modern and progressively regress again into the idea and natural truth that there can be enough for everyone on this planet if we stop fucking pissing at each other because we are tired and worn from working this fucking bullshit control system we have all suffered.
K THANKS BYE
As the US continues it's long fall towards Socialism, I am saddened by the low information populace who think that this will be a panacea.
Let me try to help you out:
Rice University: William Marsh Rice University, commonly known as Rice University, is a private research university ... (emphasis added)
As someone who is strongly committed to both free market principles and also smaller government I think this is utterly fantastic. It doesn't get better than this. It is the polar opposite of Socialism.
The university, a private entity, has made a public financial commitment that better serves its own interests and the public good. Why hate on that? I mean, seriously, I would much rather see this sort of thing than more government handouts. Those handouts require the government to use the police power of state to confiscate private property (the money each taxpayer earns) and then use a corrupt and inefficient system to dole it back out. In fact, federal education spending is probably the most wasteful spending on the part of the federal government. The university doing this for themselves means that they have a vested interest in efficiently applying the funds in question and in producing the best outcomes (successful alumni who improve the school's reputation and donate back to the school).
Sorry, but you are way off base and this should be the way that education gets fixed in this country: by the schools, not by the government.
Yeah but we Americans don't look past the end of our fucking noses do we now
FUCKING DO WE NOW, JIMMY?
This dude here talking some fucking sense
WAKE THE FUCK UP PEOPLE
WE HAVE THE POWER
The question is where will they make up the income loss? Its a private institution so I realize they can probably do this to some extent, but you also must have a certain amount of paying students too. Otherwise its like Affordable care act, where only the sick sign up and the young and healthy see no reason paying for others health care. Pretty sure in the end the demographics for this school means most students won't meet the requirements and I expect some requirements to maintain a certain GPA as well. Which should be expected and if you get a free ride the giveback should be making good grades.
$5.5 billion dollar endowment.
Rice is announcing the changes to its aid plan two years after its finances — and particularly its large endowment of more than $5.5 billion — became headline news. The school was among a group of wealthy universities that drew scrutiny from federal lawmakers for announcing plans to raise tuition in 2016.
In response, Rice said it used the endowment to cover around 40 percent of its operating costs. Officials also said the fund "covers more than 90 percent of their financial aid program," as Houston Chronicle reporter Benjamin Wermund told Houston Public Media.
Free tuition.
But it's still Texas.
And worse, it's Houston.
So where does this money actually come from? Federal grants? Royalties? Someone is paying, after all...
Ones making more than $130,000/yr
... and endowments.
That's the great thing about America - you don't get to force your own morals on other people. If you have some extra money and you'd like to spend it on sending someone to school, have at it, just don't force everyone to make the same choice.
Is that university good? No one I know earns $65000/y, a free trip sounds good!
Your great grandparents would think you're a fucking psychopath
Not that long ago we Earthlings held SOME common idea of "good" for everyone
THE KIND THAT WEREN'T FORCE-FED TO US FOR A PRICE AT OUR OWN EXPENSE
It's ridiculous what universities are paying for "temporary" educators. They got the idea from the vast temp market in areas such as engineering. There will always be someone unqualified, but qualified-on-paper, who will do the job at those rates.
One semester of bad grades, and out the door German college students go.
German 'poors' are routed into apprenticeships, same as their parents were.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
That's just what you think that people think. You are wrong, and are probably incapable of understanding that you are wrong, and impervious to reasoning that you are wrong. The good news is that progress moves ahead one funeral at a time.
I hate to burst your little bubble, but that's also the trouble with capitalism.
You are welcome on my lawn.
The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money
Rice University is a private institution, so this is charity, not "socialism".
They may have done a cost-benefit analysis and figured what they will lose on tuition, they will make up in endowment contributions from grateful future alumni who are earning and investing rather than trying to pay down debt.
> I certainly never would hire someone who had their college handed to them on a Socialist platter.
There are only three possible ways to pay for College now.
Family Money. Scholarships. Loans. That's it really. Anything beyond a community college education is going to require one of these three avenues. It's simply too expensive to pay for by working a part time job at the same time.
As income inequality rises, the number of people with Family Money to spend on an education will fall. And they'll probably go to a better company than yours.
And you won't hire people who get an education via Scholarships.
So your ranks will be filled with people who are under massive amounts of Student Debt.
See, what you're really saying isn't that you don't want to hire people who had it easy, what you're saying is you only want to hire people who are so crushed under debt that they will have very few options when it comes to exploring other opportunities for employment. They won't be able to afford to take a few months off to find the perfect job. They won't be able to pay to relocate to a new city.
The workers you are looking for are wage-slaves. People you can't treat like shit because they have no other choice.
In other words, fuck you asshole.
And I'm sure there will be a similar system in place to qualify for the free tuition.
"Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
If your family is pulling in $130,000 and you can't afford an education then the problem's in the Universities.
Maybe those $100 million sports facilities and plasma TVs in every bedroom aren't really needed.
Um. No.
Firstly, you usually *can* afford an education, you just can't necessarily afford to get diploma from a decent college other than the state college. You can still get a degree in most state systems, and you can go far beyond that for learning if you care about learning more than the degree because information is so easy to get these days. You can study computer science at your local community college and watch and work through the MIT curriculum on your own, for example.
Also, the money universities spend on sports *bring money in* to the institution. Why do you think sports are so stupidly big? It's not because they're academically useful, it's because they sell tickets and help keep people connected to the school (which increases donations).
They will cover tuition, but what about all the other costs? Not covered unless your family is below that $65k mark. I wonder if they found that they still make a nice profit on the room and board, etc.
This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
One semester of bad grades, and out the door German college students go.
That seems like a good incentive for students to do their best.
German 'poors' are routed into apprenticeships, same as their parents were.
No, German 'dumbs' are routed into apprenticeships. It is based on aptitude, not income.
And there is nothing wrong with apprenticeships. They are a good option for people that are not academically gifted.
I went to college and did an apprenticeship in metal working. Knowing how to use a metal lathe and CNC mill turned out to be very useful life skills.
oh so that means we can't do better? That we have to exactly replicate their model?
The kind of reasoning you have exemplified is rampant in American hyper critical psychology concerning how we look at improving society within this country and in the world in general.
In 1964, Rice's tuition was $0, per the Founder's will. Then they broke the will and started charging. Of course, others since, singlely and in combination, have given more now. However, this is a good step toward restoration of their Benefactor's honorable intent.
Germany lost two World Wars because of it.
Rice did without tuition for 50+ years, in the tougher years at the start.
Very good fucking point my friend!!
I cooked for 10 years. In good restaurants, some the best or busiest in their town. One might call me an apprentice chef, well not anymore, but then.
Too bad those 10 years of apprenticing got me nowhere! All I know how to do is cook very good healthy fresh food for a lot of people and also bake bread and do so with health and vigor and flavor and community in mind!
Woe is me, however will I apply all of these completely useless skills that I learned outside of college!
If we are *only* talking about food, then I agree with you. It is a fact that we throw away more than enough food to feed the entire world. World hunger is a distribution problem only, because we have *completely* solved the production problem.
I further think that we could create a sustainable system in which everyone has enough food. I am not at all worried about overpopulation because the statistical trends are clear: when people have enough they don't breed. In fact, the more people have, the less they breed, and this is true across all cultures and time periods.
HOWEVER
when we include everything that one might have, apart from food, such as luxuries, real estate, transportation, electricity, and on and on..... we quickly run into a situation where basic human nature prevents any sort of even distribution possibility. For the most part, if people can get the things they want without having to work.....they won't work. And that will in turn create a production problem that makes the whole system fall apart. Further, people who DO work want to keep what they have earned, and so if too much of what they are producing is taken away from them, they won't work, and again it falls apart. FURTHER, the task of deciding who-needs-what, and who-gets-what, is a *really hard* thing to do (crazy complex, crazy numbers), and it tends to not be done well, and fall apart. Worse yet, the people assigned that task have ridiculous power, and so natural human greed and corruption re-introduces the very uneven distribution that we were trying to fix in the first place.
So that is why socialism always falls apart when applied at too grand a scale. Human nature undoes it.
yeah but he'll shit his pants and wake up to that sour reality before he dies, so we don't even have to wait that long. Keep feeding him!
Family Money. Scholarships. Loans
College of the Ozarks is essentially free to students, but you have to work for it.
In some states, veterans get tuition at public or in some cases even private schools partly or fully covered.
If you can get admitted to one of the US military academies, the tuition is free but you pay for it with a commitment to serve. Similar military scholarships for ROTC students and some graduate students are also available.
I don't know about today, but in the recent past some loans were forgivable after 10 years of employment in certain high-need "social service" jobs such as teaching in a low-income school.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Another billionaire giving $1 billion now would pay for about 15,000 student years.
Howard Hughes was Rice's first potential billion dollar donor but he got crosswise and left his billions in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Probably something about divorcing the Founder's niece after screwing too many Hollywood actresses in the 20s, and wanting his name on the proposed medical school.
Intelligence is inheritable. Duh. Like I said, 'same as their parents'.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
It means that the people who want 'free college for all' and point to Germany are fucking liars.
'Free college for all' isn't even a worthwhile goal. Just stupid.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Until the 1960s Rice University didn't charge any tuition.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
As the US continues it's long fall towards Socialism, I am saddened by the low information populace who think that this will be a panacea. They think that money is free and there is an endless supply of it growing on trees somewhere. The unfortunate fact is, it's easy to spend other people's money until there's no more money to spend. If I was a successful job creator who had worked hard to achieve success and I had to pay to put my child through college while all the lower achievers kids just went for free, well I'd be pretty pissed. I certainly never would hire someone who had their college handed to them on a Socialist platter.
Based on the level of ignorance displayed here, you were born to middle-class parents, have a public education, some junior college, work in a call center and vote libertarian.
Liberals become conservatives with age and experience.
Unless you 'have no brain' it will happen to you too.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
If your parents live nearby you might have the option of living with them. I'm sure you still have to pay a fee for parking if you drive your car in, and there are the usual "mandatory fees" like the student union fees.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Rice University is a private institution, so this is charity, not "socialism".
Well said. Rice has a large endowment fund and can afford to shift to a model of "tuition paid by rich alums who donate". That's my favorite model for paying for college, as the university has to create rich alums who credit the university for their success, if they want to continue.
Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
from the accumulation of tax-free vanity donations from the wealthy, whose assets are insured and "stimulated" by the Federal Reserve: anytime anyone has a lot of free money it's a good bet the source is the "taxpayer" i.e. taxslave. This is probably some preemptive PR, since Rice was a proudly white-only school
My spouse went to Rice. The dorm was a pretty basic cinder block affair and the sports facility wasn't extravagant. The grounds and classroom were quite nice, however.
Plasma TVs are obsolete and it's pretty much impossible to find any TV that isn't flat. You can get them at Walmart for $100. Seems like an anachronistic comment.
That's my favorite model for paying for college, as the university has to create rich alums who credit the university for their success, if they want to continue.
Hopefully more universities will follow suit until it becomes what the market expects from universities: to not only instill pure knowledge but promote learning in philosophical values such as generosity as well, or "being a decent human being". If the performance and value a school brings to the table in terms of lifelong learning and earnings is really there for prospective students, then there should be plenty of rich and generous/amicable alums willing to donate to help maintain the value of their school and contribute to its longevity and future learners.
THAT'S WHY.
Both socialism and selfishism always have been..... And always will be. It's our job to keep it somewhat in the middle while protecting everyone's rights. So having people on both sides of the line, wherever it is today, is a good thing. I am strong, smart, and able, so I help others as much as possible. One day, who knows, I might need a helping hand. Thanks!
It is also important to note that this just covers tuition and not room and board, books, etc. At most "elite" schools, these other expenses can be 1/2 to 2/3's of the actual bill. A nice thing to do no doubt, but unless your parents live in the same city, a 100% tuition scholarship is not really going to get you over the goal line of total educational costs...
Poors: "inheritable" is a fancy word for "you get if from your Mom and Dad".
> I certainly never would hire someone who had their college handed to them on a Socialist platter.
There are only three possible ways to pay for College now.
Family Money. Scholarships. Loans. That's it really. Anything beyond a community college education is going to require one of these three avenues. It's simply too expensive to pay for by working a part time job at the same time.
As income inequality rises, the number of people with Family Money to spend on an education will fall. And they'll probably go to a better company than yours.
And you won't hire people who get an education via Scholarships.
So your ranks will be filled with people who are under massive amounts of Student Debt.
See, what you're really saying isn't that you don't want to hire people who had it easy, what you're saying is you only want to hire people who are so crushed under debt that they will have very few options when it comes to exploring other opportunities for employment. They won't be able to afford to take a few months off to find the perfect job. They won't be able to pay to relocate to a new city.
The workers you are looking for are wage-slaves. People you can't treat like shit because they have no other choice.
In other words, fuck you asshole.
It should be obvious that the asshole is lying and has never hired actually hired an employee in his life; let alone an employee with a college education.
I wish all the bitches screaming "College should be free!!!!!" would finally pony up. Put their fucking money where their mouth is. Instead they're waiting for someone else to pay for it. Fucking dumb cunts. Nothing more.
When the hell did that become middle class?
If they can afford this and keep the lights on, it really shows how much we are all overpaying for higher education.
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
$130K in NYC is poverty level. You definitely cannot afford Rice tuition with $130K. After taxes you are looking at $75K. A year at Rice with Room and Board is close to that.
Germany has had such a system for decades, and is the power house of Europe.
Thats because they can run to the USA if they need help. Life is cheap when you have no military.
You don't need to worry about how someone else gets to college. If you can put your kid through it with no problems, great! Spend what little time you have trying to make things better, not worrying about how someone may or may not be "freeloading" into an education that, quite frankly, everyone deserves.
Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
Well, that is generally a good guideline for socialized programs isn't it? Don't waste resources on people who don't actually want them, or can't substantially benefit from them. College is not actually terribly useful to many people, maybe most people. You need to have both the interest and the aptitude or you're just wasting everyone's time, and both you and society would be better off if you pursued an apprenticeship or other, less intellectual, career path.
How many college educated people do you know that ended up in careers that have nothing to do with their degree? Seems like most of them to me. All those people basically wasted their time in college.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
I pick up trash on the street and in the park when I go walking
Leaving your DNA on items that may later become evidence in a criminal case. Shame if you get sent away for something you didn't do.
I help old people cross the street
Elder abuse. One scared old person calling the cops on you and you'll be put away for years.
I call for help when I see someone who needs it
Sticking your nose into other people's business will get it cut off. Plenty of reports of couples fighting in public and, when someone tries to intervene or even call for help to "assist" the woman, then the woman and they guy join in on beating up the "helpful citizen". Leave people alone, you'll get no thanks and might get sued for your trouble; besides they're all strong and independent people who don't need no stinkin' man.
Am I a socialist now?
Only a meddling fool.
Intelligence is inheritable.
So is height. But that doesn't mean short people never have tall kids.
Heredity is complex, and dumb (and poor) parents can have bright kids, and smart parents can have dumb kids.
The German system certainly has flaws, but discrimination on income is not one of them. A bright poor kid can go to a gymnasium (4 year college) tuition free.
For kids that don't do well academically, it is foolish to try to push them into an educational track that will lead to failure and waste. Apprenticeships are a very good alternative, and are far better than what America does with our academically challenged.
Yeah, didn't Russia kick their butt once before?
'Free college for all' isn't even a worthwhile goal. Just stupid.
Assuming "all" means all who have the brains to graduate, at what level should we draw the line for "free education for all"?
In the USA, we tend to draw the line after 12th grade.
In some other countries, they draw it 2, 3, or 4 years higher (I think Belize has free college tuition, for example).
In some others, even some graduate degrees are tuition-free, albeit with strings attached (I think Cuba has free medical schools, but all doctors work for the state and they don't get paid much).
Some countries draw the line much lower, only offering free tuition to 8th grade or even lower grades.
There may be some countries that do not offer free schooling at all.
Where should America draw the line, and why?
Note: I'm not talking about "automatic admission/admission by entitlement" like the USA does for K-12 students for the vast majority of its public K-12 schools, or "compulsory attendance or registered home-schooling" like almost all of the USA does from age 6 to 16 or so (those ages may vary by state). I'm talking about "if you DO get admitted, you won't pay tuition."
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
If I was a successful job creator who had worked hard to achieve success and I had to pay to put my child through college while all the lower achievers kids just went for free, well I'd be pretty pissed.
I sense a distinct lack of altruism in your post.
To quote the current occupant of the White House, "Sad."
Or, to put it another way, "Bless your heart."
Firstly, intelligence and wealth don't correlate very well. Plenty of stupid-to-mediocre people have become rich (most athletes and actors spring to mind), and plenty of brilliant ones "waste" their life in intellectual pursuits rather than accumulating wealth.
Also, the genetics of intelligence are not so simple. There's plenty of brilliant kids born to mediocre parents, and plenty of mediocre kids born to brilliant parents. Society is best served if the poor, smart ones are able to develop their intelligence into valuable skills, rather than pursuing whatever dead-end stream of jobs keeps food in their belly. Of course, that means added competition for the stupid rich kids, so the wealthy are often opposed to the idea.
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
since Rice was a proudly white-only school
Actually they'll take anyone who scores within 100 points of the max on the SAT(*).
* = In practice, this effectively means white, asian, and indian only.
they got a $5.5 billion dollar endowment. They're spending it on free college for kids who can't really afford it. Don't forget that even if those parents are making good money now most in that income bracket still haven't fully recovered from the 2008 crash. I know I haven't.
I'm happy they're going to give out scholarships but I want to see more being done for public Universities. In 2018 college should be tuition free. For one thing given productivity raises and automation we could use less people in the job market. For another thing a better educated electorate would be in a better position to stop crap like the 2008 market crash from happening in the first place.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
One semester of bad grades, and out the door German college students go.
Complete nonsense. Where did you get that idea? If that were true, I wouldn't have a terminal degree in computer science...
Stephan
It is well respected (except football) school. At this price, it just became one of the best deals for extremely high quality university education in the world, especially for science degrees.
Disclosure: 3 family members are alumni, 2 with advanced degrees.
I went to a state school.
Except that's one way to prevent too many people from attending the same university.
Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
Wow, even a simple question like "who pays for this" gets modded down now by progressive trolls.
My entire German extended family.
It is true.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
So, when a private university sets its' own tuition policy, you call it socialism?
What does that have to do with ownership of the means of production?
Given how many Jews run the country, that's not hard to do. Have you seen how long Greedius Jewis' snout is?
Whatever you say, Comrade Marx.
It gets even more complicated. Nutrition during development in childhood has a pretty significant effect on cognitive ability, so even if you win the genetic lottery, you can still lose if you're born in to extreme poverty where caloric and nutritional intake is too low during developmental years. There's a lot of research to back that up, indicating that while cognition certainly has a genetic component, like all complex traits, there are significant environmental components as well; nutrition, exposure to heavy metals and other toxins, exposure to violence, maternal depression, and so on and so forth.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
As opposed to hiring the kid who just happened to be born to a well-off family? What did that child do to earn his Silver platter?
Next time you meet one, ask him/her. You'll find that they assume that credit for all accomplishments by any member of their family tree all the way back to Adam and Eve automatically accrues to them as if they had done it themselves.
Another fun thing you'll find is that those folks will always tell you how hard it was to get where they are despite all their advantages, then (often in the same conversation) complain about how easy it would be for the poor to be just as "successful" if only they weren't so lazy and would just try.
The US is all about forced morality. See also: Prohibition, the War on Some Drugs, historic bans on interracial marriage, the KKK, and Draconian anti-prostitution laws that punish sex workers.
This is an impressive post. Remarkable. It put me in mild awe.
I chose those words carefully.
A lot of very smart people stay liberal, because they realize that the public good is more important than the unlimited ability to hoard money.
Germany came damned close to dominating much of Europe, and if it had kept the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, it might not have had an Eastern Front at all. That was a strategic blunder driven as much by the Nazis perverse race views as by any military necessity to drive the Communists east of the Urals. As it was, it took the combined might of the British Empire, the United States and the Soviet Union to beat Germany. We're talking the pre-eminent military powers of the mid-20th century. As to WWI, well, Germany lost because of a revolution in Germany itself, and France and Britain were just exhausted by four years of war, and certainly the domestic situation in those two countries was only marginally better than Germany's. All things being equal, if the Kaiser's regime hadn't been toppled, 1919 promised to be even more terrible than 1914-1918.
But really, there's more German history from 1945 to present than from 1914 to 1945, and even when considering that period, it's useful to ponder how Germany managed, even in the 1920s, to rebuild much of its industry (with generous American loans I'll freely admit) and be in a position that by 1939 it felt confident enough to light the fuse on the Second World War.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Only after Britain and France launched the largest land invasion in history on their Western flank, and even then it took ten months of concerted effort by all three Allied Powers to bring Germany to its knees.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
the War on Some People with Some Drugs,
FTFY
The trouble with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money to spend.
The problem with all 'isms is that eventually you run out of money.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
I'm a Rice alum. I attended back when the tuition was set low, and Rice was widely considered an astonishing value for the price. Not much of an exxageration to say that even then, I was about the only one of my friends whose family was paying the full freight - Rice has always been generous grants and scholarships.
This move is significant, since it moves Rice back toward its roots. The university operated from its opening until the mid-1960s, without charging tuition at all. That was the vision of the founder. Plus, the university has a very large endowment fund, and a relatively small student body, and very, very conservative approach to spending money.
I applaud what my alma mater has done. They need to go farther, the cost of a private university education is out of control. Rice is in a position to do this, and should do more and should have done this sooner. But, this is a good thing. |
And, oh yeah - Go Owls!
The general theory has been since 1945 that it's probably best if Germany's defense is largely taken care of by other people. A unified German state with a strong military has prosecuted three major wars, one of which was pretty damned successful (the Franco-Prussian War), and two of which required the combined might of the Allied Powers to defeat. Those last two wars are the most destructive conflicts in human history, so I'd say guaranteeing Germany's territorial integrity is in everyone's best interests.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
I have a coworker that kind of bucks that trend. He's a fairly smart guy but still some how thinks a strong liberal government would take care of everything and if only we would just vote Democrat a utopia would be forth coming.
It's mind boggling.
P.S. I'm not endorsing Republicans in any way, shape or form, just expressing that there are old liberals that are quite smart.
none of you are getting this right. capitalism is where man exploits man, socialism it's the other way around.
Yeah but we Americans don't look past the end of our fucking noses do we now
FUCKING DO WE NOW, JIMMY?
I'm not JIMMY but sure we do ... at porn though a cloud of pot smoke.
The US was quite busy with its own Western front - the Pacific.
Had it not been, Europe wouldn't have taken nearly so long after the US decided to get in.
What about hoboism?
Intelligence is inheritable. Duh. Like I said, 'same as their parents'.
While true - it also means absolutely nothing.
In my family, My father, my older sister, and myself have very high intelligence. My mother and my younger sister both have average intelligence. My father was fairly poor, and my older sister worked a life full of menial jobs, despite her IQ and degree. On the other hand, I am pretty driven, and I have done well.
Silly things like "The Bell Curve" are stupid - as are the people who believe in it. Even if true, it tells not one thing about any individual.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
What about hoboism?
No money to run out of, I suppose. In any event, most people end up broke.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Nutrition during development in childhood has a pretty significant effect on cognitive ability
Indeed. Breastfed children average 3 IQ points higher than average.
Even more important is prenatal nutrition.
Good nutrition is not cheap, but bad nutrition is really expensive: Prison inmates have an average IQ of 87, and 3 times the average blood lead levels. Keeping one inmate locked up costs $30k/year. With 2.2M inmates in America, that comes to over $60B per year. Better prenatal and childhood nutrition could cut that in half.
Rice is a private university. This is not socialism as the government is not involved in any way. If you feel strongly about this, then feel free to pay full price for tuition yourself rather than bitch about a great opportunity for others.
"Sorry kids, I'm not going to pay for you to go to college. I'm also writing you out of my will. I want to make sure you work hard and grow up struggling every step of the way so that you can be just like me! You'll thank me someday."
Liberalism was what the Founding Fathers wrote about. What Horny Wumpwuss the cantankerous old nazi faggot practices is definitely NOT Conservatism by any stretch of the word's meaning, it's fascism and supremacy. He's a moron.
He has "no brain" and every time he endorses another nazi he demonstrates it for all to see. Conservatism is all but dead. His reichtarded replacement can't be bothered to tell the truth, and will be hung for treason. Liberals will be fine, lol.
It's the Trumptards who will have hell to pay in their old age. Everyone they depend on will hate their racist retarded guts, and they'll be abused en masse. Like old Nazi prison guards at 90, Trumpers will be hunted and exterminated.
It's already begun.
Your comment didn't break anyone's bubble.
Just compare life in Eastern Europe following WWII with life in the West. Which society would you have rather lived in, the one which froze 1932 and made it last until 1989, or the one that became the most wealthy and powerful society with the highest number of middle class citizens in the world since the Roman Empire? Stole it? Right. If you feel like getting rich quickly, go out and rob a bunch of poor people and see how much wealth that gets you.
Running with Linux for over 20 years!
We shouldn't need a lot of government programs if private donors stepped up to the plate. Government should only be a stop gap.
And yet, I've acdtually had people tell me that I was stupid to give money to charities and then later are heard to be bitching about government shouldn't be doing this either.
If someone hates government giving away any money then they should put their money where their mouth is and try to take up the slack.
The US is all about forced morality. See also: Prohibition, the War on Some Drugs, historic bans on interracial marriage, the KKK, and Draconian anti-prostitution laws that punish sex workers.
Don't forget Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other sites owned by those who own the ones I just listed. If you don't post or upload videos which agree with their corporate political POV then you are shadow banned, banned, suspended or your account is deleted. IOW, digitally, you are lined up against the wall and shot if your POV isn't Marxist. IF those folks every get power in DC then there is a good chance Conservatives will be physically lined up against the wall and shot. AntiFa, their thug arm, is giving us a view of the future they have planned for us.
Running with Linux for over 20 years!
If they can lower tuition, that means that did not have to raise it to meet ends. Then why did tuition raise in the first place?
"it's easy to spend other people's money" = Republicanism in a nutshell
What planet are you from?
On EARTH the tax & spend people call themselves "liberal", "progressive" or "socialist", but in reality are Marxist. Bloomberg describes how the Democrats want to reverse tax cuts and add $1 Trillion on tax hikes IF they win this midterm and in 2020. For sure they will use some of the tax money put more people on welfare so they'll become dependent on gov handouts.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news...
https://www.atr.org/democrats-...
https://www.watchdog.org/natio...
https://www.reviewjournal.com/...
http://illinoisreview.typepad....
Here's the truth:
https://www.investors.com/poli...
A thorough understanding of history actually makes smarter people socialist. The only ones who turn conservative are emotional rationalizers that cannot use logic and reason (or often believe math is a liberal conspiracy).
Education should be free or close to it for all that wish to better themselves and have the fortitude and drive to work hard. As it is now most universities and cash cows. Where football coaches for LIFE get massive life long paychecks even after only staying with the school a few years.
Socialism is a system of government. Socialism is not voluntary. Socialism is not "being nice to people." Socialism is organized, legalized, armed robbery perpetrated by people who tell you they're doing you a favor.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
Or, compare Pinochet's Chile with current day Denmark or Canada. Which one would you rather live in?
You are welcome on my lawn.
>Better prenatal and childhood nutrition could cut that in half.
Don't be ridiculous - it'd just mean we had to increase the number of laws and severity of punishment to keep up the quotas. We're not the number one nation for incarceration (by far) because our population is significantly more violent or immoral than most. /sarcasm /sort of
--- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
"'deserve' is used when a person should rightly receive something good or bad because of his or her actions or character." (Merriam Webster)
It may be best if everyone gets an education, but not everyone deserves an education.
Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
I should finish this semester and stop going to college until its free. I pay out of pocket by working full time too, I could really use a couple of free semesters.
How in any way is this socialism? I'm an Ancap, unless I'm confused this will be payed for by a privately donated endowment. People can't spend earned money how they want? Who's the commie now?
Because taking money from one person and giving it to another (usually for a vote) is morally the left thing to do....
If only you knew the difference between Marxism and socialism.
Is the military Marxist?
Just ask any of them how smart they are...fucking morons.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
Private corporations deciding what to publish can't be equated with governments putting people in a cage for deciding how and whom to make love or for what they put into their own bodies. False equivalence.
You're missing conscientiousness. That, along with intelligence, predicts life outcomes. Low intelligence, high conscientiousness means you're the best janitor in the building. High intelligence, low conscientiousness means you're a WoW guild leader living in mom's basement. High both and you're an achiever. And human intelligence does indeed follow a bell curve. Facts over feelings.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
USA has the same thing, they are called community colleges. The problem is most people going to college are not there for the degree they are there for the lifestyle.
Well said. Rice has a large endowment fund and can afford to shift to a model of "tuition paid by rich alums who donate".
You literally made that motive up - Rice never claimed that was their motive.
They've got $5.5BN in the bank, they are offering varying grants based on family needs, up to 100% of tuition and expenses. Why is everyone acting like this is something new? Universities have offered tuition assistance to poor/low-income students of merit, the change Rice is making to that program is that they are considering families earning up to $130K/year as "low-income" and deserving of tuition assistance.
Ken
If you are twenty and a Conservative, you have no heart.
If you are forty and a Liberal, you have no brain.
Ken
Education tracks and trade school seem efficient, evidence in favor of German stereotype. I worry that the tracking might not be fair in practice in the US
I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
Maybe keeping the German (and Japanese) military small is worth the money from the US to help prevent a repeat of their historical behavior
I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
Rice's $5.5BN endowment is paying for this.
Ken
Plasma TVs are obsolete and it's pretty much impossible to find any TV that isn't flat. You can get them at Walmart for $100.
Wait, what can you get at Walmart for $100??
You don't even know what you're talking about, reversing tax-cuts is about paying for our shit now. Republicans are all about the transfer of wealth from the 99% to the 0.1% Just like how the motherfucker in the oval office gave himself a tax break to pay for his personal jet.
The ReThuglicans have been lying about supply side--or tinkledown for decades, and ignorant motherfuckers like yourself still believe it.
Glad you're into golden showers.
We choose to go to college not because we are rich but because it is hahd.
I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
Socialism is a system of government. Socialism is not voluntary. Socialism is not "being nice to people." Socialism is organized, legalized, armed robbery perpetrated by people who tell you they're doing you a favor.
It's all how you look at it. I pay taxes, and those taxes are used in socialist ways: education, aged care, health care, civil infrastructure (roads, rail), national defence, police departments, fire departments, ambulances, subsidised childcare, environmental management, water management, vehicle registrations, navel safety and more. Whew! Well, you know there's a heck of a lot of services provided using those taxes.
Are you saying these services shouldn't be provided by the government?
Or that perhaps just the level of service provision should be under scrutiny?
I look at many of these as preventative services - I'd rather pay a percent of my taxes to educate all children rather than have to feel unsafe due to a high uneducated criminal element. I'd rather have a safe neighbourhood as a result rather than needing a walled in fortress to protect my family and home, or pay for armed security guards. I'd like to know I can let my kids play in a government provided playground and not have to worry about needles or razorblades in the equipment - because that equipment is regularly checked and serviced.
Should I go on?
How about knowing that my kids are growing up in a lower lead environment than I did? Less asbestos? Less DDT? Less/no CFCs? Better nutrition through better quality control of food?
How about food safety and environment regulation - do you care about where something is made, whether the jobs are in your town, state, or nation? How about sustainability?
More? The entire Defense department.
All that comes at a cost, and I'd rather have everyone pay so that we get economies of scale rather than try and attempt much of that myself (and fail).
Wow, even a simple question like "who pays for this" gets modded down now by progressive trolls.
Or perhaps they are more educated then you.
How the system works
My entire German extended family.
It is true.
Well, there are at least two models of the world in which this statement is true. Either your entire German extended family consists of zero people, or they are lying.
The German education system has a lot of problems, but throwing out students after one semester of "bad grades" is not among them.
Stephan
This is a stupid comment and obviously intended to be. Probably written by a Russian troll to create more division. Since when did doing something good for people become bad? Grow up.
The trouble with socialism is that people love quoting phrases about socialism without actually understanding anything about it.
German 'poors' are routed into apprenticeships, same as their parents were.
I don't understand your comment and I am sitting in a room full of german Dipl.-Ing (professional engineers) and Doctors who started life as electricians and fitters. Many of them earnt quite a bit more than I did while doing their degrees.
That's because one hour of your time googling up the answer doesn't cost me anything. Quite the opposite.
But I'd guess it has to be the paying customers who pay. You can't really be a top-notch university and have only stupid, rich customers. People would notice Rice graduates are idiots, causing a decline in demand for Rice degrees. Only by camouflaging the paying stupids in a sea of smart (rich or poor) graduates can the university keep selling its degrees.
That's why I went there for my first degree. I was accepted by an Ivy League school, too, but Rice seemed the better value. They were still transitioning from the will-breaking that allowed them to charge tuition in the first place. (That was the same thing that allowed them to accept nonwhite students, by the way. I'm pretty sure the will also specified men, but somehow they allowed women anyway, even before they broke the will?)
Having said that, I'm not too overall impressed by President Leebron, whom I've met once or twice. I think his real priority is to get the money for a law school, which is the last thing Rice (or America) needs. Overall I feel like only the Hack and President Rupp were really putting undergraduate education first, but the other recent presidents have been pushing for growth and research and various other priorities.
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
Rice has a huge endowment. I think it's second highest on a per student basis. Before he died Rice was supposed to be the third richest man in America (or perhaps the world). No close relatives, so all his money went to the school (after his murderers were caught and the fake will was canceled).
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
I ended up getting college grants due to bad eye vision and my mothers income from the government when I went to college. Paid for everything. What is the difference?
Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
"and is the power house of Europe."
You do know Europe is speeding towards the brick wall of reality right?
Germany is ahead of the pack on that one and thankfully I'm in North America most of the year.
Rice is paying. Essentially through their endowment. They have a large, well-invested, and well-managed endowment that throws off a bunch of cash every year. First-and-foremost, they use this cash to maintain the campus, and pay "endowed chair" faculty. Their $5.3B endowment should throw off something like $212M/year, which is more than enough to fund operations. They are giving the leftover money to (the poorest) students. ...
Presumably the students will give back to the university later on, but Rice can afford for them not to.
Americans have had it too good for too long and now need a cataclysm to appreciate how good they have it.
What they needed was Nixon on Steroids, what they got was Trump light.
It's really a shame he still held back by the same people behind all of US presidents.
"It is based on aptitude, not income."
Not when you take into account the wealth of information and experience some have beyond their peers because of their Parent's class advantage.
To this day my co-workers think I'm from Mars because I can talk about almost anything with authority.
I read while they thumb their i-phones.
Sad really.
Your basic idea makes some sense.
I would make several changes:
1) Admit more students to any given program that you need, because some will drop out and some will choose other careers. For example, a person training to be a physicist on the government dime might graduate and suddenly have a "calling" to become a high school physics teacher and go to teaching-college on his own dime.
2) I wouldn't ban non-government-guaranteed loans to students, provided they are willing to do so at non-usurious interest rates. I doubt many commercial banks would offer loans unless the parents put up collateral, but non-profits would likely do so. If memory serves, Benjamin Franklin provided for student loans in his will. Such altruism should not be prohibited.
3) Students who don't maintain the best grades may lose their scholarships but they should not be kicked out of their programs unless they are actually flunking. A student whose family couldn't afford to send him to engineering school for four years may be able to pay for his final year if his grades slip below "excellent" after 3 years. The number of students who are expected to "stay in the program on their own dime" would be baked into the "freshman class size" calculation above.
Any such system would also have to factor in things like:
* People change careers in mid-life, so the number of people you expect to need in any given field 4, 6, or 10 years from now may change in ways you can't predict today.
* Industries change, which also messes up future-need predictions.
* People trained in one area can, upon graduation, choose a related field with relatively little additional training. This can leave graduates who are trained in the desired field competing with others who graduated in related fields. It can also leave some fields under-served if their trainees "jump ship" and want to work in a different field.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Get a Freon education courtesy of Willis Carrier???
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Intelligence is inheritable. Duh. Like I said, 'same as their parents'.
No, it isn't.
Yeah, didn't Russia kick their butt once before?
Holy shit sweet fucking Jesus on a mopped. WWII ended 73 years ago. The socio-economic context in which that bloody shit show started and ended had little bearing to the socio-economic context of today.
If your family is pulling in $130,000 and you can't afford an education then the problem's in the Universities.
Maybe those $100 million sports facilities and plasma TVs in every bedroom aren't really needed.
Depends. A household income of $130K in San Francisco is not the same as the same raw number for a household in Wichita. Similarly, there are other factors to consider. Is $130K the product of two earners, or only one. Does the household has zero kids, one or two, or more. This is important since if there are two earners, then there are additional expenses from cradle to college (in terms of child care during work hours.) And if there's only one income earner, then sure there are no child care expenses, but there is a loss of income potential. Either scenario is affected by the number of kids involved.
And let us not get started if a household is a single-parent one.
A $130K household in Wichita should not qualify for free college, but one in an expensive metro might qualify to some form of voucher.
The money shot is in that line where median income *per locality* is. Households at or below it qualify for free college. Anyone between that point and the top middle income can qualify for some sort of assistance which decreases proportionally as income increases.
Quite honestly, I would prefer that the first years of college be free altogether, or that we give more preference to apprenticeship and vocational programs as well as associate in science degrees that lead to immediate job opportunities.
We focus too much in 4-year university degrees.
FUCKING DAMGED GNARLY DNA
Don't forget the last line of that:
If you need a trite litany to justify your conservative values, you have no critical thinking.
You're missing conscientiousness. That, along with intelligence, predicts life outcomes. Low intelligence, high conscientiousness means you're the best janitor in the building. High intelligence, low conscientiousness means you're a WoW guild leader living in mom's basement. High both and you're an achiever.
I 'm not certain that conscientiousness is always the right word. While people i have worked with have always considered me as Boy Scout honest, if they had to use a one word description, "ruthless" or "driven" would be more accurate. In any situation, Ipick the most productive person in a group, and do much better.
And human intelligence does indeed follow a bell curve. Facts over feelings.
Perhaps. Let us say that we plot average intelligence. And according to your wishes, there is a racial component to it.
Okay - what are you going to do with that? Are you going to stand 50 feet away from a person of that race and give an accurate truth of their IQ?
And given that every person I know who believes that IQ is somehow welded to racial characteristics is as white as I am - after determining what you want to do with the "lesser races", remember that the white race is not at the pinnacle of average intelligence.
The only use of the bell curve is to insinuate intelligence by race, and since racism is that weird majick that allows a mentally challenged terminally unemployed white guy pretend he is superior to a Genius who just happens to be of dark pigmentation and of African descent.
Whihc is to say, not only useless, but pointless and wrong.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
That trite saying illuminates more about you than it does about socialism's proponents.
If you are forty and a Conservative, you're a lucky/privileged or completely stupid motherfucker, because you've been working your ass off for decades to make the 0.1% richer than ever.
They have $5.5 Billion, assume no interest income, a student costs $60K a year for 4 years to get a Bachelor's degree. Simple math states $60K*4 years* 4000 undergrads. That comes to a whopping $9.6 Billion cost. You can't count on interest income off that 5.5 bil because interest will go to zip when the market craps out like every democrat says. So, after 3 years were back to tax payers funding the students for free. Classic Socialism at its finest failure mode. I hope their idea works but it just so happens the guy typing this paid his own tuition.
Life is in a state of dynamic equilibrium, it both blows and sucks
Nobody mentioned race, buddy. That's all on you. Racists are always thinking about race. You just made a bunch of assumptions, constructed multiple strawmen, and then told me that's my position. That's so bad you do that, is that what smart people do?
Conscientiousness is indeed what we're talking about. It's one of the Big 5 personality traits, along with Openness, Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Agreeableness. If I had to guess, I'd say you're low in agreeableness and openness, since you're quite aggressive and are closed-minded to new information. The Big 5 are replicable science. It's not something under debate. The only debate is if there are six factors instead of five. People who are high in intelligence and conscientiousness will do very well in life. Again, this isn't under debate. I'll just leave this here, but due to your closed-mindedness, I'm not sure how much good it will do: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
It's probably why they forced you into a terminal degree, rather than giving you the option to continue a full GUI/web one.
But their taxes are much higher, and just wait until the migrants start demanding higher education with lower standards, because islamaphobia or something.
Read the article. Is it really that hard?
I just asked my German wife, as we live in Germany I'll take her word for it.
It depends on each study course, but there are restrictions if you don't pass your exam. Many of which if you fail once or twice, you're out.
If you want to study that subject again, you'd need to start over, and likely in another state.
Being a lawyer is even worse, fail once and your done in Germany, period.
Nobody mentioned race, buddy. That's all on you. Racists are always thinking about race. You just made a bunch of assumptions, constructed multiple strawmen, and then told me that's my position.
Wowee.. It's pretty obvious that you can't have a conversation without thinking that mean old uncle Olsoc isn't accusing you of something.
Siddown. Shuttup for a second.
Your insinuation that I was accusing you of being racist is interesting. I'm not certain exactly where I wrote that. Kindly point it out my paranoid friend And yes, I do judge, and you fit the paranoia spectrum to a T.
The reason I brought up the Bell curve in manner related to the use of the bell curve by racists is that it is simply one more completely useless use of the Bell curve. The same as using a bell curve to judge the intelligence of a person born to poor people
A bell curve of any use whatsoever us 100 percent useless. Pointless. A huge nothingburger. You cannot tell the intelligence of any individual. be they poor white people, or shemale midget scat porn actors by virtue of the fact that they are any grouping of people.
And note, dear DNS and Bind, I'm not accusing you of being a shemale midget scat porn actor either.
Point is, the Bell curve is useless, and the only judgement I might make is upon the intelligence of anyone who thinks it somehow means something.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
This is probably the first positive bit of news I've read about university policies in many years. This makes me happy, I hope more educational instutitions follow suit.
I note you didn't bother to refute the Big 5. That's because it's science. You're closed-minded and disagreeable, and this makes you reject any idea you didn't come up with yourself. Human intelligence does indeed distribute on a bell curve, just like many other heritable traits. Now, your next argument is to *giggle* insist that intelligence isn't heritable.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
I note you didn't bother to refute the Big 5. That's because it's science. You're closed-minded and disagreeable, and this makes you reject any idea you didn't come up with yourself. Human intelligence does indeed distribute on a bell curve, just like many other heritable traits. Now, your next argument is to *giggle* insist that intelligence isn't heritable.
Why on earth would I insist on intelligence not being inheritable. That my dear punchinello, ,is an uncontested fact. My family is largely brilliant.
Okay - let us cut through your fog. I'll ask a few questions.
Do you agree with the material presented in Charles Murray's Publication, "The Bell Curve"?
If yes, what exactly do you wish to do with that bell curve? GIve us a detailed plan of action required to address the Bell curve to make use of it and what it represents.
I say there is nothing that any bell curve presents that is of any use because it addresses nothing on an individual basis.
You seem to disagree with that, so educate me.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
and are far better than what America does with our academically challenged.
Being on Fox news isn't so bad.... well... bad for us...
Cheap storage VM.
It depends on each study course, but there are restrictions if you don't pass your exam. Many of which if you fail once or twice, you're out.
In most universities and courses, you get about 4 chances to pass an obligatory exam, plus an extra chance when needed. I teach at a place where you only get 2 and 1/2 chances. But maybe we talk at cross purposes - for me, "bad grades" is a C or D (or 3 to 4 in the German system), not an F/5. If you fail the final chance, then yes, you are out - you can go to one of the other two university types (research universities, universities of applied science, cooperative university) and try again. But you don't necessarily need to start over - you can apply to transfer earned credits, and that is routinely granted if the subject is the same.
Stephan