Slashdot Mirror


Secret Amazon Brands Are Quietly Taking Over Amazon.com (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Arabella. Lark & Roe. Mae. NuPro. Small Parts. You might not know it from their names, but these brands all belong to Amazon. Amazon's private label business is booming, on pace to generate $7.5 billion this year and $25 billion by 2022, according to estimates from investment firm SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. To accelerate that growth, the company is inviting manufacturers to create products exclusively for its collection of private brands. The "Amazon Accelerator Program" is hiring a senior product manager for private brands, CNBC reported. The job listing invites applicants to "invent and Think Big to take an idea from concept to reality for Amazon customers." Duties include managing and planning inventory, identifying business opportunities, and working across a wide swath of Amazon divisions, including consumables, Prime Pantry, Prime Fresh, Prime Now, and Amazon Go. Another job listing spotted by CNBC, for a private brands program leader, notes that the "Private Brands team is rapidly expanding and is looking for an exceptional product leader to grow the business." Brands created through the accelerator will be exclusive to Amazon, but not owned by it, the company said. Further reading: Amazon is Stuffing Its Search Results Pages With Ads.

122 comments

  1. Keep using them, drones! by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Good little drones! Keep working towards making a real dystopia! One giant mega-corp that supplies you with everything. That'll work out well. Keep giving them your money, dummies. Keep on, keepin' on.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Keep using them, drones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a mature, reasonable, and likely successful way of convincing people that you're correct and that they should alter their behavior! Congrats!

    2. Re:Keep using them, drones! by DogDude · · Score: 2

      I'm not going to convince anybody. This country/society/culture is fucked.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Keep using them, drones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So edgy... we're all gonna band-aids after that post.

    4. Re:Keep using them, drones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh, you're just a whiny little jerk. Got it.

  2. Getting pushy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They seem to get pushier by the day. Now they add on a row of "related items" THEY sell....or a row of books if they don't sell any actual related items themselves. Over half of my last search was sponsored or Amazon ads.

  3. This is what anti-trust laws are for by turp182 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have knowledge of what sells from other parties, what's popular.

    They then manufacture those products and directly compete on their sales platform, with full knowledge of sales and pricing of their competitors.

    What's that smell? Federal intervention.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They have knowledge of what sells from other parties, what's popular.

      They then manufacture those products and directly compete on their sales platform, with full knowledge of sales and pricing of their competitors.

      What's that smell? Federal intervention.

      There is absolutely nothing about this that will trigger any anti-trust law.

      How is this any different than any other house brand?

      Many other big retailers carry in-house products that they do not advertise as being house brands or any association with the retailer itself. This is common practice.

      Care to guess how many of the tool brands inside Home Depot are sold exclusively at Home Depot?

    2. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more egregious violation is Amazon's enabling of IP theft and copyright violation by partnering with Chinese companies to make, market and sell knock-offs. Those annoying "sponsored" posts on Facebook for t-shirts and other clothes and fashion accessories that appropriate other companies designs and IP (Calvin and Hobbes and Peanuts characters being popular targets for misuse)? Those companies are all either Amazon partners or fronts for Amazon-owned off-shore companies.

    3. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Amazon put their product higher ranked in their search result, or if they suggest to their customer to buy their product instead of competitors on checkout page, then it may unfairly use their monopoly. But if all they do is selling their own brand of products, I don't think that would trigger antitrust law.
      Amazon doesn't know their competitor's invoice price. Their competitor can find Amazon products sales ranks and easily guess their sales numbers. There's no unfair advantage yet.

    4. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I'm rational enough to use and prefer Amazon for everything except hosting (Digital Ocean ftw). Hasn't stopped me from pointing out that they make over 100% of their profits from AWS: their businesses run below profitability and they shore them up with cloud computing services.

      That's predatory pricing.

      Boycotts don't work; but those people who talk about a boycott and don't bother doing it themselves? They'll talk. They'll talk about breaking AWS off from Amazon. They'll talk about Federal anti-trust investigations.

      That works.

      It works even if you don't have enough people to make a dent with a boycott anyway.

    5. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by ksw_92 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Everything old is new again. Remember Craftsman, Kenmore and Hotpoint? All well regarded brands and one point and all made by the same companies that competed with those brands. House brands are just the next step in the life-cycle of a retail organization.

    6. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      They have knowledge of what sells from other parties, what's popular.

      They then manufacture those products and directly compete on their sales platform, with full knowledge of sales and pricing of their competitors.

      What's that smell? Federal intervention.

      How is that different from, say, Walmart having a store brand to compete with name brands that it sells?

      (Pick another grocery chain for the example if you must, it doesn't change the point)

    7. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that smell? Federal intervention.

      Dude, Bezos has proven launch capabilities. No one will investigate or intervene. At best, we'll get a show of negotiation after which PotUS will tweet the all's well even though nothing has changed.

    8. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think companies should not be allowed to sell their house brands under a different name than the company name. For example, "AmazonBasics" is fine. You clearly understand it's an Amazon brand.

      An alternative would be a clear and governments-standardized branding/label/warning to make it clear that it's made by Amazon, Canadian Tire, Costco, Home Depot, etc.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by lgw · · Score: 1

      Every Amazon business is profitable over COGS (almost) every year. They spend almost all those profits on growing the business. They're not generally selling below cost. The appearance that AWS is profitable vs the store is just a game to keep the stock price up: investors love AWS and are bored with retail, so AWS is "profitable".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that smell? Federal intervention.

      Will Trump put his money where his mouth is?

    11. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You would also have to Prosecute my former employer JCPenney (also Sears, Macys, etc). My ex-emploer JCPenney has MANY private label brands, which try to copy the style of more popular brands: Honestly I sold more of JCPenney's brands than any other.

      - Arizona Jeans (and shirts)

      - Stafford suits, dresswear and shoes

      - Towncraft suits, dresswear and shoes

      - J.Ferrar casualwear

      - St. Johns Bay casualwear

      - Cabin Creek for women

      - Worthington dresswear for women.

      And on and on and on. This practice has never been illegal by retail stores, and it is not illegal when amazon does it.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      They don't manufacture it, the just put their brand on it (with the permission of the manufacturer). Many companies do the same thing.

    13. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      So, if you make chairs and it costs $10 in materials and $5 in labor per chair, COGS is $15. If you sell those chairs for $20, you go out of business.

      Why?

      Because all the other stuff in your business amounts to $8 per chair, and it costs you $23 to produce each chair. You're losing $3 per chair.

      Drawing more money than COGS doesn't imply profitability. The gross profits in any fast food business are around 50%, with net profits below 8%: selling less than 90% over COGS implies running into the red and going out of business. It's narrower for many businesses, but it's always wider than zero.

    14. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by hey! · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than any other house brand?

      At present about 49% of all online purchases are made through Amazon. And that number is climbing. That's what's different.

      If I'm American Standard and I'm competing against Home Depot's in house brand of faucets, I can pull my products out of Home Depot if I think I'm not getting fair treatment. I can still sell stuff through Lowes, or plumbing supply stores like Grainger or F.W. Webb. But Amazon is well on its way to owning retail ecommerce. It's not so much that Amazon is a retail monopoly, but that it's becoming a wholesale monopsony.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      I went to a Home Depot just last month to buy a drill. Second time I ever bough a drill, and the first was close to 20 years ago.

      I asked the sales rep and he gave me a lot of helpful information. He then guided me towards two brands (I forget their names - I'm sure you can look them up). They were totally different brands, but the sales person told me that they were both Home Depot brands.

      I picked one of them given the good sales pitch and excellent pricing and warranty.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    16. Re: This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bought some Amazon Basics brand bed sheets for my kids.

      Decent quality for $17 CAD.

    17. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by turp182 · · Score: 1

      We buy tons of things from Amazon (just checked, 48 orders in the past 6 months, good lord!), but I welcome any government intervention. It will happen, when is the question.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    18. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by turp182 · · Score: 1

      Copy of a post I replied with to another user. It's about market share (everyone but Amazon and Walmart are part of the long tail of all sales):

      In the US, Amazon has almost 50% of ALL online sales. And abut 5% of all retail.

      https://techcrunch.com/2018/07...

      I'm not sure what would constitute/define a monopoly with regards to Amazon, but once they are over 50% of all online sales they would have a majority among a group tens of thousands of other online sales companies.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    19. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Care to guess how many of the tool brands inside Home Depot are sold exclusively at Home Depot?

      Exactly. Hobby Lobby is another. There's a whole blizzard of cutely named store brands in there.

    20. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by fermion · · Score: 1
      In this case, the antitrust laws can help prevent Amazon from acquiring firms to reduce competition to the point where no one else has a significant presence in the market. This is what prevents the US from only having a single mobile phone company or having all the major radio stations, such as they are, owned by a single firm. I don't know if we are there yet with Amazon. Small parts built a very good business over the past 50 years producing very nice hardware, in the classical sense, that they sell for a terrific markup. But they are in no way the only firm that does this. They likely sold to Amazon because the market is not that large for their high quality but very expensive products, and having Amazon as an outlet keeps the company alive.

      The reality is that Amazon has some successes and some failures. The bought Woot! and destroyed it.It remains to be seen what remains of Whole Foods after Amazon finishes dismantling it.

      Amazon has a tolerance for throwing money at existing business that are past their prime and then trying to revitalize them. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    21. Re: This is what anti-trust laws are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are dead wrong! many times they require the seller to provide the invoice. for different murky reasons. and even though you can blot out the price they will get ypur suppliers details and can contact them directly. (as has happend many times)

    22. Re:This is what anti-trust laws are for by lgw · · Score: 1

      Put a different way, Amazon usually has left-over money that could have been paid out to shareholders, and they use all that money (and sometimes more) to grow the business. Contrast with MS Azure, where the business loses money before growth every year, but MS has 10s of billions to throw at undercutting the competition.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  4. Isn't this a common practice? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    I've seen Costco and Winco do this: a name-brand is popular, so they come up with a equivalent (more or less) house branded version.

    1. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having a store brand or products produced for a store by wholly owned subsidiaries is indeed pretty common. It will be worth keeping an eye on though as Amazon continues to grow and integrates more into its ecosystem.

    2. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah more or less every retailer and grocery store does this.

    3. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 2

      Costco got into a fine mess last year when a South Korean golf ball supplier sold them surplus golf balls and Costco resold them under the Kirkland label at $29 for two dozen. The golf industry got turned upside when golfers realizaed that the Costco golf balls were better than the more expensive premium golf balls.

    4. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Chris, your Lord and Savior. Pray me into your heart and I will forgive you of all your sins.

    5. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Costco got into a fine mess last year when a South Korean golf ball supplier sold them surplus golf balls and Costco resold them under the Kirkland label at $29 for two dozen. The golf industry got turned upside when golfers realizaed that the Costco golf balls were better than the more expensive premium golf balls.

      Well, I'm sure Costco didn't plan on that - all Costco did was buy golf balls from a little-known supplier in the US, and package and sell them under the Kirkland brand.

      It just happened that the Koreans were making better balls than everyone else, but because they weren't known, it took Costco to make them known.

      Shopping house brands is good - you can get some real savings over the brand name product, and depending on who actually makes the house brand, it might even be the premium product. The only reason they're cheaper is well, everyone knows the premium brand.

      I buy Walmart branded stuff quite a few times - it often tastes the same but costs a lot less (a family size bag of chips for under $1 is nice over spending $3 for the normal branded stuff). Granted, it's not always good so I'd test them by buying one bag first and seeing if it's worth it. If it's awful, I don't buy any more and stick with the regular stuff. If it's good, I'd probably switch.

    6. Re:Isn't this a common practice? by acvh · · Score: 1

      Another common practice not mentioned here (that I could see), is that of a retailer getting a name brand manufacturer to make cheaper versions of the name branded products to sell; buy a pair of Levi's at Walmart and you do not get the same quality as a pair of Levi's from Macy's. Most people, however, just see the name and assume some baseline level of quality. Poor them.

    7. Re: Isn't this a common practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol you shop for your family at Walmart? LOL!!!

  5. Small Parts by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

    Used to be a great source, they published a nice catalog with all the details of their ball bearings and metal stock items. Not any more. Since Amazon bought them, you get what information they feel like providing and browsing the catalog is no longer an option.

    Oh well...

    1. Re:Small Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company I used to work for provided the accounting system for Small Parts. It was a really cool place to visit. I lost contact with them after Amazon bought them out. I got to visit the founder one day and he told us about he and his wife had survived hurricane Andrew. He hid in one end of the house and his wife hid in the other. Once the storm had passed, the middle of their house was gone, but the 2 ends were still there.

    2. Re:Small Parts by beckett · · Score: 1

      is there an alternative to Small Parts? I really depended on their silicone tubing for many years, but it seems like forever ago.

    3. Re:Small Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is what Small Parts Inc was doing for decades before Amazon existed. So I have no problem with that. That is a small mail order business that would have probably gone under as the owner aged.

  6. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't care. As long as they don't exclude competitors, and the reviews remain honest, I'll decide based on price and reviews.

  7. Probably selling Amazon brand computers by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    Complete with state of the art SuperMicro motherboards

    1. Re:Probably selling Amazon brand computers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Complete with state of the art SuperMicro motherboards

      Nah, MSI mainboards with VIA chipsets.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Having your own in-house brands... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    ...worked real well for Radio Shack.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Having your own in-house brands... by Going_Digital · · Score: 1

      Well, yes it did, it was in in the 2000's when they stopped and that was responsible for killing them off.

  9. No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What I've noticed about Amazon brands, they are the cheap-ass Chinese shit that is sold for 20-30% more when they are labeled with another brand.

    Look at a lot of the products. They are identical to other brands because they are made by the same Chinese factories but the pricing is different - just because.

    It's not just an Amazon thing either. You'll products in every category that will look identical, have identical functionality but different brand names and prices. And some brands get premium prices - but the product is made and marketed by someone else who licenses the brand name.

    Amazon is just doing what Sears & Robuck sort of did years ago - and what many retailers do now (Home Depot bought the Husky and Rigid brands and made them their own). However, Sears had their own quality control department and actually specified additional features to differentiate themselves from others - years ago before the private equity guys took over.

    Note: Sears' customer base - along with JC Penny's - was the American middle class. As the Middle Class' fortunes fell, so did Sears and Penny's.

    In short, as my standard of living continues to decline (I made a poor decision by getting that MSCS), I welcome Jeff doing this and may he get richer if he softens my decline from student loans, rising healthcare costs, unaffordable health insurance because I'm in a Medicaid non-expansion state (Republican), and the fact that I was aged out of tech. )

    1. Re:No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Informative

      I won't bother listing the prices because from what I've heard not everyone will see the same prices anyway.

      Yes, some kits come with different accessories, but look at the pot and pan. Apart from colour, they're all exactly the same. The first one, "AmazonBasics", is clearly Amazon's brand, nothing deceptive there. But when you look at most of the other brands, you start questioning wether they're real companies or not.

      AmazonBasics Outdoor Camping Cookware Set

      MalloMe Camping Cookware Mess Kit

      Gold Armour 17Pcs Camping Cookware Mess Kit

      Terra Hiker Camping Cookware

      gear4U Camping Cookware

      HONEST OUTFITTERS Portable camping cookware mess kit

      Bisgear 12 Pcs Camping Cookware

      EcoCamp OUTDOOR GEAR Mess Kit (14 Pcs)

      Born to Venture Camping Cookware Mess Kit

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the entire point of Amazon Basics IMO: cheap Chinese stuff that you at least know are sold by a real company that accepts returns, and that has some sort of quality bar above fraud. I'm a big fan of Amazon Basics A/V cables: they're cheap, but never too cheap.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      The qt and gal zip-top freezer bags and the 13gal trash bags are great

    4. Re:No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > All praise Amazon!

      I see your Amazon Basics network cable is working fine!

    5. Re:No, I'm a Lemming you insenstivive clod! by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Same reason I buy stuff at Costco. Not always the best dollar deal but I know that I'll have an acceptable product for a fair price that I can return if I wish. Come to think of it I've never had to return anything to Costco in 20 years... same with Amazon.

      Like you mention, it's the standard of quality that maters. Maybe not the best but it's good enough and will work as intended.

      Now some of the stuff from Banggood...

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  10. Worst kept secret by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    Not exactly a secret. They've been pushing "our brands" on the homepage for at least a couple of months now. They have their own brand recommendations listed in a separate grouping from the "normal" recommendations.

  11. Careful shopping finds loss-leaders by DCFusor · · Score: 2
    Morality aside for the moment - there are some really decent values on some of these - for awhile. I suspect the usual procedure of marking them up higher priced if they get popular will apply as usual, but it's hard to resist some things that cost half as much, and for really good quality, as they do locally. This will not last, and I've seen the price transition happen on a few items already - it's bad to get hooked, stupid to use auto-reorder, dash, or alexa without checking of course, as that's a sneak path for an unexpected and unannounced (till you see the bill) big markup.
    .

    If it's immoral to do the best you can with what you have for your family, well...it gets complex fast, doesn't it. I'm sure some of the outfits who'd go out of business fast if they didn't have Amazon to re-sell their stuff for them, now that local is doing dead (due to Amazon and Walmart) - have to be selling below cost - if not, they've been really ripping us off the whole time, and just deserts is what I say. So it won't go on for long, but for now...smart people who pay attention always have an edge.
    And no, I'm no fan of Bezos or his politics. What I'm suggesting is taking advantage of the outfit when they play the loss-leader game.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:Careful shopping finds loss-leaders by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      Do you have brand loyalty to your jeans? Or to your sodapop? What about to the screws you use to fix things, or to the electric screwdriver? By the time the government decides to reign in Bezos, it will be too late.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    2. Re:Careful shopping finds loss-leaders by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If it's immoral to do the best you can with what you have for your family, well...it gets complex fast, doesn't it.

      To quote Jerry Seinfeld: “We’re trying to have a civilization here...”

      I believe we need to be looking at the bigger picture and that we have some level of responsibility to the other folks around us. But even if someone doesn’t give a rat’s ass for anyone who doesn’t share their same name - they need to consider the world their offspring will be living in, 40 or 50 years down the road. Letting Amazon do whatever it wants now may not be in their best interest.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Careful shopping finds loss-leaders by DCFusor · · Score: 1
      I might not disagree, my point was other. If they starve now, or simply lose opportunities to learn due to not getting the tools bought wherever - the future matters les because in that case, there isn't one. My "family" isn't genetic, it's broader than that, it's a ... community? Don't know what to call it, I mentor and support a lot of people I call "my kids" even though they aren't mine biologically.
      /

      And you might have missed my point about loss leaders. No one is building up their empire further if I take advantage of them selling below cost, but STOP the instant they start charging real bucks - which WAS my point. I said *smart* shopping.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    4. Re:Careful shopping finds loss-leaders by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      I like good jeans, which I assume some market will make available at some price, one at least some can afford if they want to stay in business, but I can wear any sort, and even make my own if I can get the raw materials...likely they could even be made in the rural area I live in that has resources city folk forgot were important because people here provided them for so long. Like milk comes from the supermarket, right? Some of us live closer to the earth.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  12. Cleft stick for manufacturers ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    respond to the Amazon invite and see your branded labels lose market share to the lower cost Amazon equivalent; end up being a low margin production house. Not respond and Amazon will go to one of your competitors and you end up losing market share anyway but without having Amazon as a customer.

    Amazon can undercut since it does not have the overheads of maintaining a brand - advertising, etc.

    1. Re:Cleft stick for manufacturers ... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Just like every grocery store, Wal-Mart, Costco, and everywhere else with their own private label brands.

  13. Private label goods by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have knowledge of what sells from other parties, what's popular. They then manufacture those products and directly compete on their sales platform, with full knowledge of sales and pricing of their competitors.

    So do grocery stores, retail stores, etc and they all sell private label goods too. I don't really see this as a problem. Kroger sells Kroger branded milk right next the other dairy brands and usually for less money. Walmart sells all sorts of private label goods at discounted prices. Amazon is doing nothing different here at all.

    What's that smell? Federal intervention.

    Not unless you can prove that Amazon is a monopoly first and then that they are abusing that monopoly. Good luck with that. The branded product makers are welcome to drop their prices to compete if they like. If they aren't providing enough value to justify their brand then why should I as a customer care?

    1. Re:Private label goods by turp182 · · Score: 2

      In the US, Amazon has almost 50% of ALL online sales. And abut 5% of all retail.

      https://techcrunch.com/2018/07...

      I'm not sure what would constitute/define a monopoly with regards to Amazon, but once they are over 50% of all online sales they would have a majority among a group tens of thousands of other online sales companies.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    2. Re:Private label goods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should care , cause when monopoly rules U-B-Fucked. And 3-years down-the-pike your gear-options will have aged poorly while MonopCo still rakes in the $$$$$ .

  14. Amazon Reincorporates as Omni Consumer Products by sehlat · · Score: 1

    At least, that's how I'm reading this bit of expansionism.

  15. Boo hoo by sjbe · · Score: 1

    The golf industry got turned upside when golfers realizaed that the Costco golf balls were better than the more expensive premium golf balls.

    So an industry based on an elitist rich man's game that charges outrageous markups on their equipment is pissed when someone undercuts them on price? Cry me a river.

    1. Re:Boo hoo by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're thinking of modern golf. That's not how golf got invented. ;)

      Golf was a game played by Hobbits, similar to that of modern-day golf. According to Hobbit folklore, it was invented when Bandobras Took charged at Golfimbul during the Battle of Greenfields and knocked Golfimbul's head off. The head flew through the air for 100 yards and went down a rabbit hole.

      http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Golf

    2. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this wasn't funny when my elementary school teacher read the hobbit to the class.

    3. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your elementary teacher didn't want you to be whacking off in class.

    4. Re:Boo hoo by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      So an industry based on an elitist rich man's game that charges outrageous markups on their equipment is pissed when someone undercuts them on price? Cry me a river.

      Wow...what do you have against people that do well...or like a particular sport?

      I suppose you think everyone that has more money than you, and plays golf is an asshole or otherwise horrible person?

      Sheesh...why not worry about yourself getting more ahead in the world and less about others that made it? There's no need to be jealous or mad at those that are successful.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Boo hoo by sexconker · · Score: 0

      Tolkien was a terrible writer.

      Writing a LOT of wandering masturbatory crap doesn't make it GOOD. Shoving an absurd poem or song in the middle of the text or spending pages upon pages describing how Hobbits eat breakfast isn't world building, it's padding.

    6. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So an industry based on an elitist rich man's game that charges outrageous markups on their equipment is pissed when someone undercuts them on price? Cry me a river.

      Man, do you know anything about golf, or are you just talking shit because you have nothing intelligent to say?

      At the 'country club' level, maybe .. but I assure you, the vast majority of people playing golf are just playing at local clubs which aren't 'elite' in any way shape or form, and bear no resemblance to 'country clubs'.

      I play golf with friends for exercise and social time. We play at a cheap course, where you're more likely to see pickup trucks with Browning stickers than you are anything fancy. No dress code (well, you have to be dressed, no naked golf), no fancy clubhouse (it's old and tilting), and you can get a beer and a hotdog for like 5 bucks. I see more people who look like plumbers and truck-drivers than I do anything resembling 'rich' or 'elite'.

      If you think golf is an elitist rich man's game, you know nothing at all about golf. While the elitist rich folks do have places they play that you and I could never go to (*cough* Trump *cough), most people who play golf will never play there, and wouldn't want to.

      You might as well criticise soccer/football for being a game of nouveaux-rich douchebags and base that purely off the pro-players. You'd be just as wrong.

      I assure you, with a cheap set of used clubs, and a bag of recycled balls, you can probably find lots of cheap places to play ... and nobody will give a shit about the labels on the clothes you're wearing. One of my playing partners plays in cargo shorts and t-shirts.

      Far far more people are playing on little local courses which are far from 'elite' than play at the places you're bitching about.

    7. Re:Boo hoo by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 0

      Tolkein was a literary scholar writing for an academic audience. He wasn't writing for the masses and resented being a cult figure to a generation of hippies.

    8. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Chris is a terrible writer too, like, abysmal. But in Christopher Dale Reimer's sick mind, this means his ebooks will bring in royalties just like Tolkien's books.

      https://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10731353&cid=54610733

      I got ~60 published short stories, another ~30 short stories circulating for submission, and I can easily write four 5,000-word stories per year. Let's say I have 200 short story ebooks by the time I retire in 30 years, and they averaged $11,000 in sales each, my total income by retirement could be $2M+.

      CROFLOL

    9. Re:Boo hoo by lgw · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that Tolkien guy totally couldn't write. *rolls eyes*

      He didn't follow standard dramatic conventions, which is one reason it's so fun to return to Tolkien's work after reading too much modern fantasy drivel. It's not written like a comic book or Harry Potter story, that's for sure. The Hobbit was a kids book, and moves along well, but the rest of his stuff was written for grown-ups.

      I still have hope we'll get a good Hobbit movie in my lifetime, one for kids about a middle-aged homebody turning out to not be quite the boring loser you thought he was.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Chris, your Lord and Savior. Pray me into your heart and I will cure you of your penis envy.

    11. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Chris, your Lord and Savior. Pray me into your heart and I will cure you of your grammar nazism.

    12. Re: Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, that story where dwarves steal gold from goblins or whateverthefuck was intended for an academic journal.

    13. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris' case is getting much worse since he now knows that 90% of his YouTube channel views was a prank, he spends all day replying to himself as AC or using so called "sock puppet accounts" on Slashdot and now, on YouTube and other forums in order to grab attention!

      Chris had an agenda to post anything he felt like on Slashdot which did not work well because it was based on his false beliefs that he had an infinite number of karma points as he wrote here several times.

      Several people here explained to Chris that karma maxed out at some level like 50 or so but Chris kept on insisting that his python script had confirmed that he had millions of karma points!

      Oh well, as I wrote before: "It isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody."

      For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

      IMPORTANT UPDATE:
      Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
      http://www.keynamics.com/image...

      Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and his type of autistic people:

      Chris' type autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, Chris went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

      To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

      Chris' condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

      Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

      I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
      http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

      Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
      https://ibb.co/gVad65

      Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
      http://ibb.co/mRVSaG

      But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

      Thank You dear users,
      ---
      Nancy Guerrero
      Director
      Special Education
      Santa Clara County Office of Education

    14. Re:Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly Nancy,

      But it seems like Chris is a victim here. He keeps on reading those SEO, youtube algorithm, basically get rich quick sites. He doesn't realize that he is the fish for them since they make money off him with their own schemes. Then, he wastes his time trying to implement what those sites suggest and he ends up disturbing people.

      I mean, those crooks tell Chris that he has to build personal brands and he goes on the Internet and makes everything about himself public!

      I believe we should bring this up at our next meeting. He might not be our only patient victim of such on-line abuse.

      https://www.researchgate.net/p...

      --
      Silvia Bunge
      Psychology Department
      University of California, Berkeley

    15. Re: Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in an area where most people are poor and uneducated and land prices are cheap. When you go somewhere nicer, land prices alone make golf prohibitively expensive for most.

  16. s/Amazon/Umbrella Corporation/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's begun.

    1. Re:s/Amazon/Umbrella Corporation/ by ezakimak · · Score: 1

      s/Seattle/Raccoon City/

  17. "Secret"? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    At least in coffee and paper towels, Amazon has clearly labeled these under a section headed "Our Brands", or had "an Amazon brand" or something like that showing.

    It was no secret, and it bothered me not at all, no more than store brands in grocery stores.

  18. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is all part of their gran plan to eliminate ALL the competition in retail in the western world.
    Eventually there will be no volume retailers left standing other than Amazon.
    Stop using them. Buy local before you lose it.
    I only use them as a port of last resort. But how many xxxx do the think I want eh? on xxxx will last me a lifetime.

  19. Beats the Best Buy "Price Match" Policy by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    They only price match with products sold explicitly by Amazon, meaning they wont match against these other brands, meaning they simply wont be able to compete. I just bought a JBL Charge 3, got it $30 less via Amazon Prime, rather than wait, I went to Best Buy but they said wouldn't match the price because even though it was distributed from Amazon's Warehouses by Prime, and the price info even said "discount provided by Amazon", but they refused to match because the specific vendor wasn't Amazon. For $30 less, I felt it was worth the wait. I ordered late early Friday evening, and it was in my hands first thing Sunday morning. Bye bye Big Box Store populated with clueless people wearing stupid vests

  20. Here we go again by holophrastic · · Score: 2

    Big Marketplace creates huge opportunities for Suppliers.
    Suppliers suddenly put 80% of their eggs into Big Marketplace baskets.
    Big Marketplace changes rules, squeeze Suppliers.
    Suppliers can't afford to leave.
    Suppliers cut corners to cut costs.
    Big Marketplace takes more dollars.
    Suppliers innovate to create crappier crap.
    Consumers lose options, forced to buy crap.
    Winner: Big Marketplace.
    Losers: everyone else
    Enjoy.

  21. "Secret"?-Generics. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    Sometimes that's the ONLY* way to making one's dollars go farther.

    *Couponing is a job unto itself, and lots of restrictions, to gain the same benefits as generics.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  22. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is all part of their gran plan to eliminate ALL the competition in retail in the western world.

    I don't really see that....this is a common thing for many retailers. You see it in every day grocery stores, hell, you REALLY see this in places like Costco, and even Sam's Club.

    Hell, I often buy the Costco (Kirkland brand) stuff, and it is as good, or even slightly superior to the major brands. I too believe Costo gets major labels to make them special stuff, I could swear the Costco Kirkland brand vodka is made by Grey Goose....etc.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  23. Did not Ruin my Wedding - Amazon Clear Cake Plates by nevermindme · · Score: 1

    You know those clear plastic cakes plates that you use for between 1 and 3 minutes then recycle to get cake into your guest's cake hole, and you wife of about an hour cannot be seen delivering that via a paper plate. I bought 150 for my wedding at a cost of about 15% what the grocer wanted to charge me for them in some odd number of plates per package. 14 or something like that. Guess what, Amazon Cake plates did their job as they were 100% perfect without the grocer's odd counts. My cake plates arrived on time and had a smile on the wrapper and my fiance had a tracking number for every item on her list at 3am 4 days before the reception.

    I find it wonderful some Amazon contractor is taking gross delivery and packing to the needs of a logistics company and more important the needs of the customer and not shelf space considerations at a grocery store that give us 12 hot dog buns to a package and 8 hotdogs.

  24. 'private brands' vs 'Amazon acquisitions'? by david.emery · · Score: 2

    How many of these labels are existing companies that were bought by Amazon? Small Parts, for example, was bought by Amazon a couple years ago. (I remember ordering from them before they were part of Amazon.) At one level, it doesn't make a difference, the profits got to Bezos. But it seems to me a legitimate business strategy for Amazon to buy successful companies that add to their portfolio of things they sell directly.

    There is a legitimate concern -if- these acquisitions and private labels have an impact on competition.

    1. Re:'private brands' vs 'Amazon acquisitions'? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The thing about competition is that Amazon is competing with every single brick and mortar store. I buy things from Amazon only after I verify that even with shipping it is cheaper or identically priced to stores in my area. Amazon very well might be able to buy out or otherwise ruin their competition on Amazon. But if their power cords cost more than Canadian Tire's or Home Depot's they are not going to get much business.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  25. Amazon brands underpricing existing brands by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    There are some business opportunities here, but also I can feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  26. strange way to do it by magarity · · Score: 1

    Arabella. Lark & Roe. Mae. NuPro. Small Parts. You might not know it from their names, but these brands all belong to Amazon

    Why does no one know these brands belong to Amazon and what happened to "Amazon Basics"? OK, they might want to differentiate another level from "Basic" but why not "Amazon Supreme" or whatever... when I got to Safeway I know "Private Selection" is the house brand, OK, no problem. At Costco, it's "Kirkland", again, no problem. WTF good are a bunch of stealth brands?

    1. Re:strange way to do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remember the old days when the grocery store had a special aisle for the generic brand items, the packaging was all bright yellow, and all labelled, literally, "Generic XYZ" ?

      As a kid I used to think that "Generic" was an actual, real brand.

    2. Re:strange way to do it by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      Most of these "secret" brands are for women's clothing, makeup, and dietary supplements. It's a sneaky way to charge women more than they would pay if the item were labeled, say: "AmazonBasics Women's Vibrator". Now don't get me wrong, there are some Amazon Prime subscribers that would buy those in an instant, but they would expect them to cost less.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    3. Re:strange way to do it by magarity · · Score: 1

      the grocery store had a special aisle for the generic brand items, the packaging was all bright yellow.

      You may be thinking of either "Yellow Pack" (UK) or "Back to Basics" (USA). Ironically, by definition those were both brands.

  27. Not a monopoly by sjbe · · Score: 1

    In the US, Amazon has almost 50% of ALL online sales. And abut 5% of all retail.

    Neither of those numbers are anywhere close to monopoly status. They are the 800lb gorilla of online sales no doubt but a monopoly they are not. And that second number is an important one. 5% on retail is a lot of retail but it's a looooooonnnnggg way from monopoly status. And even if they are a monopoly that doesn't make it illegal to sell their own branded good. Literally every other major retailer does exactly the same thing so it's hard to argue that Amazon should be subjected to special treatment for selling private label goods.

  28. Re:Did not Ruin my Wedding - Amazon Clear Cake Pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This very much reads like a parody amazon review, funny

  29. Re:Did not Ruin my Wedding - Amazon Clear Cake Pla by sexconker · · Score: 1

    I find it wonderful some Amazon contractor is taking gross delivery and packing to the needs of a logistics company and more important the needs of the customer and not shelf space considerations at a grocery store that give us 12 hot dog buns to a package and 8 hotdogs.

    It's 10 hotdogs and 8 buns.

  30. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "House brands" are common, but some companies such as Walmart and Amazon use them in anti-competitive ways.

    If a product is tweaked and rebranded, it makes it harder to comparison shop.

    A store can have a low price guarantee, and offer to match any advertised offer by a competitor or even an additional 10% off. But that is meaningless because they can insist that it is a different product due to the rebranding. Even for products sold under the original brand, Walmart often has unique model numbers that are sold no where else.

  31. Better than a Chinese Copycat Shop by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I'd rather buy an Amazon house brand versus some of the random crap coming from a questionable Shenzhen copycat shop.

    1. Re:Better than a Chinese Copycat Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But... Amazon house brand literally is random crap coming from a Shenzhen copycat shop?

      They are in the race to the bottom with everyone else.

    2. Re:Better than a Chinese Copycat Shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure those Amazon house brands are made in the same Shenzhen shop where the "random crap" is being made.

  32. Problems with golf by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Wow...what do you have against people that do well...or like a particular sport?

    I have nothing against people who do well - I've been pretty lucky myself compared to some and I'm enthusiastically pro-doing-well. I have a problem with people who behave like they are better than others when they do well. I like all kinds of sports and I don't care what anyone plays - doesn't matter if it's my chosen sport or not. Get out there and be active and have fun. I'm not thrilled about sports that are too expensive for lots of people to play but I can live with it to a point. However I have a BIG problem when people use those sports to exclude others particularly minorities and women and golf is legendary for excluding disadvantaged groups. How could it be that you aren't aware of these problems?

    I suppose you think everyone that has more money than you, and plays golf is an asshole or otherwise horrible person?

    Not at all. I honestly could not care less how much money someone has and I wish you and everyone else well. I play golf myself from time to time and most people who enjoy it are perfectly decent folks. But if you aren't aware that there are some serious racism, sexism, and elitism problems within the sport of golf and with the country clubs that host the sport then you have been living under a rock.

    1. Re:Problems with golf by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      However I have a BIG problem when people use those sports to exclude others particularly minorities [huffingtonpost.com] and women [golf.com] and golf is legendary for excluding disadvantaged groups. How could it be that you aren't aware of these problems?

      Because, anytime I've been out to a golf course, I"ve seen minorities and women....even female minorities playing.

      And I live in the deep south....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  33. People complained about low quality China shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Bezos made his own essential stuff like monitor cables and salty snacks. You whined, and got what you wanted. Now you whine more! Our civilization needs to stop paying any attention to whiney assholes.

  34. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this crap posted on slashdot?

  35. Re:Did not Ruin my Wedding - Amazon Clear Cake Pla by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    We usually buy Hebrew National - those come seven to a package.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  36. so by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    tell me a store that does not sell their own private brands? what store would not place their own brands in a prominent location in order to sell? Why is the story about Amazon but not Walmart, Target, Kroger, or other major chains that does the same online and in their brick and mortar store?

  37. Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netflix openly pushes its own content. Meanwhile, content from other providers that Netflix used to build its customer base is dwindling on Netflix.

  38. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by dj245 · · Score: 1

    This is all part of their gran plan to eliminate ALL the competition in retail in the western world.

    I don't really see that....this is a common thing for many retailers. You see it in every day grocery stores, hell, you REALLY see this in places like Costco, and even Sam's Club.

    Hell, I often buy the Costco (Kirkland brand) stuff, and it is as good, or even slightly superior to the major brands. I too believe Costo gets major labels to make them special stuff, I could swear the Costco Kirkland brand vodka is made by Grey Goose....etc.

    Grey Goose probably isn't cost-compeditive, although to their credit they do have their own distillery. Probably someone like Citrus Distillers or Spooky Beverages. A lot of the "Big Brands" are nothing more than paper companies that design bottles and market.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  39. Small Parts by hey! · · Score: 1

    Comes up all the time when you are searching for stuff for DIY builds and fixing stuff. I just bought a 24 foot spool of 8 gauge stainless steel wire off of Amazon and it was branded "small parts". You search for bushings, bearings, metal dowels and rods, odd sized or material bolts or nuts your hardware store won't carry, and that brand comes up.

    The thing is, as much as I despise Amazon as company, the stuff they offer through Small Parts are incredibly useful, but hard to find.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by Daemonik · · Score: 1

    This is ridiculous because the manufacturing has already consolidated to the point that most products have 1 to 3 manufacturers in the world. The vast majority of brand names exist as shell companies that have their label slapped on a slight variation of a product all coming out of the same factory to suggest it has more or less features/value for the price.

    Buying local only works for niche products or services, anything mass produced is all about value for the dollar and that works entirely in Wal-Mart of Amazon's favor.

  42. I Hate House Brands... usually by eepok · · Score: 1

    I hate house brands... usually. When they're not named for the company that sells them, it feels like the store is trying to trick me into believing that they're selling an industry-forged item. If Performance Bike sold "Performance Bike" branded bicycle saddles and tools, I wouldn't have a problem. But re-branding them as "Spin Doctor" to compete with the likes of Pedro's and Park Tool seems wrong. Why? Because I'm fairly certain that most house-brands are lower quality than national brands. Sometimes the lower quality is insignificant, but the discount is sufficient to make going with the house brand, but if you don't know the entire industry (as it is with most bicycle riders), you think you're getting a strong competitor's product at a reasonable price.

    I like the "Amazon Basics" branding. I would be happy if Amazon's brand "NuPro" was actually "NuPro, an Amazon Brand" for a couple years until all the regular Amazon shoppers KNEW that NuPro was an Amazon brand and THEN they dropped the "an Amazon Brand" part.

    I would 100% support a measure from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would require such labels.

  43. I keep saying this by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    we keep electing people who are opposed to gov't regulation, which Anti-trust laws are. We shouldn't act surprised when said laws are either weakened or unenforced.

    You can't have a functioning government that only functions when you want it to. Not unless you're rich enough to bribe yourself to one. If we want effective government regulation we have to start electing people who say and do those things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I keep saying this by turp182 · · Score: 1

      True all that. I've thought long and hard about the issue of external money and influence (difficult to stop given the 1st Amendment, money and speech are tightly intertwined, as well as access).

      We need more political parties, but the two of them have a lock on the system, notice who doesn't get invited to debates (and tings like redistricting - "Let's draw a map where our voters are at!", this actually proves how locked into the two-party system we are). At this time I'm not happy with the 3rd party alternatives either.

      That said, business regulation is complicated. Many times it is a "barrier to entry" for upstarts. That's bad (and probably bought). Regulation "shifts" the boundaries of freedom. But it both makes sense and is necessary, think bribery (ohhhh snap!, right back to politics...).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  44. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    That is not anti-competitive. Finding ways to charge more for a product is the exact opposite of anti-competitive. Well, at least in how that word is typically used, because in a more generic use sure, it is anti-competitive in that the store is no longer competing with its competition and everyone has just gone to the store that sells the same things for less.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  45. Re:Who wants to get fucked by Bezos whims? by jtgd · · Score: 1

    Their batteries are made by Duracell.

    --
    J