Slashdot Mirror


Trolls Are Still Actively Trying to Influence Brexit and US Elections (go.com)

TechCrunch reports: A major new campaign of disinformation around Brexit, designed to stir up U.K. 'Leave' voters, and distributed via Facebook, may have reached over 10 million people in the U.K., according to new research. The source of the campaign is so far unknown, and will be embarrassing to Facebook, which only this week claimed it was clamping down on "dark" political advertising on its platform. Researchers for the U.K.-based digital agency 89up allege that Mainstream Network -- which looks and reads like a "mainstream" news site but which has no contact details or reporter bylines -- is serving hyper-targeted Facebook advertisements aimed at exhorting people in Leave-voting U.K. constituencies to tell their MP to "chuck Chequers." Chequers is the name given to the U.K. Prime Ministers's proposed deal with the EU regarding the U.K.'s departure from the EU next year.
ABC News reports: When the Justice Department unsealed criminal charges detailing a yearslong effort by a Russian troll farm to "sow division and discord in the U.S. political system," it was the first federal case alleging continued foreign interference in U.S. elections. Earlier Friday, American intelligence officials released a rare public statement asserting that Russia, China, Iran and other countries are engaged in ongoing efforts to influence U.S. policy and voters in future elections. The statement didn't provide details on those efforts. That stood in contrast with the criminal charges, which provided a detailed narrative of Russian activities...

The criminal complaint provided a clear picture that there is still a hidden but powerful Russian social media effort aimed at spreading distrust for American political candidates and causing divisions on social issues such as immigration and gun control.... Court papers describe how the operatives in Friday's case would analyze U.S. news articles and decide how they would draft social media messages about those stories. They also show that Russian trolls have stepped up their efforts with a better understanding the U.S. political climate and messages that are no longer riddled with misspellings.

CNN notes that one week before America's 2016 presidential election, "one of the Kremlin-backed accounts denied that Russian meddling, saying: 'Russia's Putin says Moscow not trying to influence U.S. election.'"

29 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everybody I disagree with is a troll.

    1. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know, right! Someone else exercising their right to free speech. How dare they.

      The right to free speech is a limited right applying only to the government stopping a particular person from speaking. That's it, period.

      A troll in this context is someone who is trying to manipulate from a non honest position. They may lie about who they are or they may be telling content based lies or well all of the above.

      Now, generally I think one legitimate government should stay out of another's affairs. That should be the default position, but if they are going to influence they should be open and honest about it.

      In short this isn't a really a free speech issue. It is rather a question of honesty and integrity in the process. Democracy fails when the inputs are corrupted, hence all the effort to corrupt the inputs.

    2. Re:The truth by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Troll is definitely the wrong word for this. These guys are trying to manipulate public opinion and the British political process in a way that is likely illegal, since they are masking who they are.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone posting about politics on Slashdot and elsewhere on the Internet is doing the same thing. This includes you, AmiMojo. Everyone wants just as badly as you do to increase the size of their tribe and gain more support from people who might be on the fence. This kind of discourse has been going on since the dawn of the Internet. Hell, this type of pseudonymous political social interaction likely predates the Internet. I would not be surprised if BBS users did the same thing, though I was too young to join that scene at the time before it fizzled out.

      This is not illegal election interference. This is people on the Internet running their mouths off about things they're passionate about. It's humanity at work. It's been going on for over 30 years and it makes you look like a fool to make a boogieman out of this non-issue.

      If you want to know what it looks like for someone to knowingly, willingly, arrogantly and mockingly violate the laws of another country's election interference laws, look no further than John Oliver, resident of the United States of America, who earned over 11 million views on YouTube and countless more via television as he and Mike Myers (axe, not knife) told viewers in Canada not to vote for Stephen Harper. This wasn't an innocent sketch, he knew exactly what he was doing and gloated about it with a wad of cash in his hand.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V5ckcTSYu8

      This is why the rest of the world has a bit of trouble taking the United States seriously when they complain about interference. The United States set themselves up on a high moral pedestal as an example for the world to follow. They probably have the worst track record of any other nation in history when it comes to meddling in foreign elections, and now they're mad that other countries *might* be trying the same thing? Don't even make me get started with what they've done to South America or Iran or any other number of examples where they utilized actual government forces rather than just celebrity opinions.

    4. Re:The truth by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone manipulates public opinion. Know what the difference today is vs 30 years ago? Now everyone can leave their own views, input, beliefs and "let the group as a whole" make the decisions as to what they're saying is good or bad. This pulls views away from the elitists, the pundits, the manipulation by the media telling you how you should view something. That control they had for decades is something they've lost.

      The most recent meme aka NPC meme is a great example of this. The political left, pundits, media just freak out over it. What's the problem with it? Well the let "claims it dehumanizes people." But...there's a problem with that. Why weren't they being banned from social media platforms when they were screeching that conservatives, libertarians, trump supporters, mad max, doug ford supporters, were all labeled as racist, neo-nazis, sexists, reacists, bigots, homophobes, white nationalists, race traitors, uncle toms, and so on.

      I'll give you your answer. Because it struck too close to home. The NPC meme is a satirical mocking of a loud-mouth leftist pundit/politicians point and those who suppor it. It becomes effective to everyone else because a person and look around at the people they draw to them, and then notice how much is full on regurgitation of these same points, in the most stupid way. Usually involving some form of attack against the persons job, family, race, sexual orientation and what not.

      Conservatives find this funny because they can and regularly engage in self-deprecating humor. Progressives do not. And in a round of "OMGROFLF" phase, Twitter banned 1500 accounts that were not violating any rule, or policy, or anything else. The reason? Nobody knows, and twitter is refusing to day why.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re: The truth by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > weak strawman. Try harder.

      The original remark is neither of those things.

      The definition of "troll" has been devalued to nothing more that "someone I disagree with" for a long time now. A lot of people can't handle the idea that someone would disagree with their particular cult.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re: The truth by poity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are conflating a natural right with the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. They are not the same. The former is broad and philosophical, the latter is narrow and legal. The latter is derived from the former and is subordinate to the former when talking about spirit and intent, as OP was.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    7. Re:The truth by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The "outrage" over the NPC meme is fake, and a great example of how fake news can be divisive.

      Really? Could you please explain then, why sites like the washington post and NYT were falling all over themselves publishing actual articles on it. Not opinion, articles. Then please explain why all those blue checkmarked retards were falling all over themselves screeching that it was dehumanizing. No no, this wasn't 'outrage fake news' this was real news that for whatever reason triggered the hell out of them. And this was despite the fact that they used ad-homs all over themselves and attacking conservatives with them.

      Here's a study of a recent example of fake outrage over the new Doom game

      You don't seem to know what "fake news" actually is. Just like how you don't seem to grasp that SJW's exist. You seem to misunderstand what's going on here, so I'll explain it. The left is full-on outrage bait all the time, this isn't fake news, this is news made for people who have a desire to have their sensibilities offended. This isn't new, it's been going on for years. Hell you were parroting outrage bait not that long ago, and were all over yourself about how Pepe is a "white nationalist symbol" and other garbage.

      Please stop repeating this stuff. All you are doing is driving the wedge between people who think of themselves as conservatives/rational and everyone else in deeper.

      Why don't you go tell the left wing press to stop printing it then? The mainstream press in western countries doesn't cater to conservatives or libertarians. But it directly caters to people like yourself who eat this garbage day in and day out.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. Gullble people by riverat1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately there are a lot of gullible people in the world who just skim the headlines and don't bother to dig down in any detail on an issue. Lazy thinkers will always be with us and all we can hope for is there are enough people who aren't that way in order to counter them. Lately it's kind of depressing how much of this has distorted the political realm.

    1. Re: Gullble people by Highdude702 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe the main reason Trump won is because of this "Hillary Clinton was one of the most qualified candidates I've every seen with experience in all sectors of the federal government." Were sick of career politicians. That is not what this country was founded on, and letting the politicians get rich on the backs of the people is a bad way to go. Hell look what they are doing, and yes I'm stating that the politicians WANT us to fight against each other. It just helps to entrench them some more. II say we do what china has done in the past and kill every member of government and vote new in. It would give the new an example of what not to do, so long as they didn't want their head to end up on a spike in the White House lawn.

  3. "Trolls" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The term trolls in this context just reeks of, "I need to denigrate everyone I disagree with." Certainly, there are entities that are out there to influence foreign affairs. Everyone does it to everyone else. It should be no surprise to anyone who has a pulse. How about "foreign meddlers"? Instead of using a completely unrelated word to suit an agenda, you can use existing terminology and really capture what is happening. Also, let's not forget the "hackers everywhere!" thing either. I hope many of you on Slashdot can at least understand the idiocy of using "hacker" every time something happens. I won't deny that these people are trying to sow discord among the citizens of the U.S. and U.K., but the media in either of those countries have been doing it for years as is, and very few people seem upset about it compared to this. Why is that? I don't need the media telling me, "orange man is bad", or "old lady is crazy and debilitated". I just need the media telling me the facts without their hyperbolic opinions. And they could try not omitting facts for a change so they're no longer spinning a narrative.

    And we have to ask ourselves, what other entities, foreign or domestic, are targeting us? Do you really believe all domestic entities have our best interests at heart? Just look at AIPAC. They don't care about protecting the U.S. They care about protecting Israel. The U.S. is secondary in their overall aims. This should concern everyone. The U.S. certainly can't help everyone else if it can't help itself, and I would say this for any country. You need to ensure you're taking care of your own first, otherwise you let others drag you down. How many of you have seen this happen to those around you? How about yourself? The only difference is that geopolitics has a lot more factors going on to consider, but the basic idea stays the same.

    The whole system is broken from the major details to the minor details. Submissions like the, "The Trolls Are Still At It!" do not help anyone, anywhere, at any time.

    And my captcha was "circus". Salient.

  4. what they don't say says more than what they do by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's odd that we [the us] do it to them and it's ok, but fuck them if they do the same thing to us. God I hate politics and politicians.

  5. Yeah yeah by nagora · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how these trolls always affect the side the person writing the article doesn't support, isn't it? I mean, no one would dream of spreading misinformation on the Remain side - they're all saints devoted to the purity of Truth.

    I'm sure Russian trolls are feeding out misinformation about all sorts of things. The real issue is whether it has any more effect than the lies politicians tell.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Yeah yeah by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wasn't the Remain folks who had to admit after the election that they'd been lying all along.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Yeah yeah by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, no one would dream of spreading misinformation on the Remain side

      And yet they didn't. The remain side was characterised entirely by: "World isn't as bad as Leavers make out. We don't know what will happen if we vote Leave." There was no disinformation to spread.

      Unfortunately the truth was both a boring and weak argument. The Remain side's biggest fault was they didn't play a dirty game in the dirty world of politics.

    3. Re:Yeah yeah by Bert64 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because they lost, so any lies they might have told would never have been exposed anyway.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:Yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People these days are more paranoid than the US during the cold war.

      Not everything is about imaginary Russian bots. People disagree with you. Real people. Even if you cannot fathom how anyone could have another opinion, that doesn't make them trolls or bots.

    5. Re:Yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There was no disinformation to spread"
      Sure, Project Fear was completely accurate and all of its predictions have come true. Just like 89up mentioned in TFS is a completely neutral observer and not a pro-EU PR agency.

      "The Remain side's biggest fault was they didn't play a dirty game in the dirty world of politics."
      Sure, and they're still pure as the driven snow. Which is why Mainstream Network, "source of the campaign is so far unknown" couldn't possibly be a company directed by Martin Ellice, MD of the group that owns the Daily Express. And it would be impossible to find that out in 30 seconds by looking them up at Companies House.

      Face it, it's politics. If you think your side isn't spewing at least as much shit as your opposition...

    6. Re:Yeah yeah by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      lie

      You keep using this word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Half of the stuff you list is rumours and projections.

      You're right about one thing though, the brexiteers have not admitted to the bullshit that they spouted (and keep spouting), they will never take responsibility for the mess we're in and will be in. Everything is someone else's fault. The EU being uncooperative. Remainer conspiracy. They will never own anything. If it doesn't help then it's because you didn't believe enough. Because it wasn't a clean *enough* break.

    7. Re:Yeah yeah by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah yeah. Funny how the Brexiteers always counter with vague accusations of lies but can somehow never be specific.

      Remain didn't make a compete lie the cornerstone of their entire campaign. Brexit camp knew it was a lie yet plastered it in the side of a bus and paraded it around the county.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  6. Yeah The Horror by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine people actually able to see differing points of view. They might just decide they don't like what their betters have planned for them

  7. Re: Disinformation? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While this sort of thing is typically frowned upon -- you both are being a bit silly, in that you're missing the point.

    That was an *open*, and *plainly visible* thing. That is not even remotely the same as people pretending to be real users, genuine citizens, and instead being paid for foreigners, pretending to belong to the country they are trying to destroy.

    If Trump, Putin, anyone tries to OPENLY say "Vote this way!", that has no bearing on this conversation, on this topic. It is instead, the goal of secretly funding, and secretly trying to destroy a foreign power via trickery that is the problem. A problem, that really only democracies are vulnerable to, for in a fascist state (like Russia, or China), if you dissent? You're in trouble period.

    Where as the citizens of a democracy? Have the RIGHT to complain...

    Meanwhile, we have sneaks, spies, paid for people FAKING belonging to the citizenry of democratic nations. That's a very, very dangerous thing to do to a democracy.

  8. The politicians are just as bad by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember, the the poll booth 2 years ago, trying sum up what I had learned from what the politicians has said over the preceding weeks. I remembered a huge amount of emotional froth but little by way of solid detail or summary of what would happen. I had listened to debates between politicians who could not even agree on basic contemporary facts - that should have not been hard to ascertain. The misinformation was more than political spin: it was outright lies. I am not the only one of that opinion.

    The only agreement between the sides was 'the other side is lying'.

    Now, two years later, things are not much better. We have been told of all sorts of horrible things that will happen after 29 March 2019 (Brexit day) but are well aware that these are being played up. Both sides have too much to lose if the hard lines being talked about come to be. Exaggeration of consequences and declarations of impossibility seem to be the way that political negotiations are done. The bright sunny post Brexit uplands, that we are assured (by the Brexiteers) will come to be, are equally nebulous.

    What passes as debate between politicians would bring discredit to a bunch of squabbling 4 year olds at infant school.

  9. Re: Common reasoning... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all underrated. (Except the stuff I believe in, of course)

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  10. Re:The politicians are just as bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    You could, you know, marry her and eliminate all doubt and fear about her future. It's been 10 years - what are you afraid of?

  11. Re: Disinformation? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What difference does it make if some particular bit of bullshit propaganda comes from Russia or Enron or the CIA or the DNC/RNC or whoever? The message is what's important, not the messenger. You say they want to "destabilize" the system? Well so do I. That's why I voted for Trump, because the system fucking sucks. And now that they're out of power, the left wants to destabilize things too. After exhausting every lega possibility for removing Trump they've resorted to open violence and calls for dismantling the government itself. Did Russia get us to that place, or did CNN and the Kochs/Soros and all the other rich, american sociopaths behind 99.999% of the political so-called information people are exposed to?

    You're holding up the trivial fact that someone lied about their country of origin in the standard course of lying about a hundred other things to push a political agenda as the big, bright dividing line. The nationality of the person who created a meme or article or whatever else is the absolute last part of the equation I give a fuck about. If some Russians in a basement somewhere on a shoestring budget can out-persuade billions of dollars worth of the best professional advertising people America has to offer, then more power to them. If that's the case, maybe they deserve to run the world after all.

    Or maybe you're just desperate for a scapegoat to explain away your failure and are far, far less immune to paranoid bigotry than you like to think.

  12. What aboutism at its worst! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hell, Obama flew over personally to threaten Britain into voting remain and no one raised a shitfit about America "influencing" a British election.

    That is the most moronic thing I have read here in years. And Obama didn't influence anything you fucking halfwit.

    Here's why it's moronic and everyone who mod'ed the parent up are idiots.
    Obama's job as POTUS was to protect the interests of the USA. BREXIT was against our interests. Obama went there in good faith and told the truth.

    The Trolls are liars who hide behind screen names. Here is a list of their bullshit that got Trump elected - and anyone who believes them are morons ( Trump supporters)

    1. Illegal immigration isn't that big of a problem. And what the ignorant morons ignored was that it was the OBAMA administration that had ICE round them up. That's why in my state, we don't have any of that problem. But the Republicans are still campaigning on it because their base are morons.

    2. No, the "left" doesn't want to take anyone's guns. (I need healthcare not guns. And healthcare is a human right: NOT guns.)

    3. There is no homosexual agenda.

    4. No one wants to persecute Christians.

    5. The ACA or Obamacare allows people with pre-existing conditions to get health insurance. And if the goddamn Republicans weren't so Hell bent on fucking over Obama, we'd have a slightly better system and affordable insurance. But thanks to Republicans wanting to fuck him over, they didn't take Federal money to expand Medicaid and fucking over people - making rates skyrocket.

    6. The FBI didn't find any wrong doing by Kavanaugh and the same with Clinton. Think about that.

    Jordan Peterson asked how are the Trumpers going to be included again in political discourse in America. What he fails to understand is that those people do NOT want to. They are off in their pathetic ignorant bubble and like it there.

    We don't need a wall; we need healthcare for all. Israel is not our friend - and we give them tens of billions of dollars in "aid" every year and no one bitches about THAT welfare! Canada is our best trading partner and they never screwed us - but Trump treated them like jerks.

    Trump is fucking over our economy. But his idiocy won't manifest until a few years from now - this tax cut isn't doing that much and whatever it has done is short lived (stock buybacks and bonuses for the CEOs). But the Republicans will tell their moronic base that the Democrats and the Liberals and Immigrants and gays caused it and they better vote Republican for control of the Supreme court because the Democrats are baby killing gun takers.

    How do you talk to people whose world view is based on bullshit and lies?

    BTW, shooting someone who wants to take your TV is barbaric. Pro-life my fucking ass!

  13. If Americans weren't so fucking stupid by DougDot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The trolling wouldn't work.

  14. Re: People voted to exit by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Democracy is a fine idea, but doesn't just depend on votes. It depends on choices made by informed voters. The Brexit voters were deliberately misinformed by the side that won, which it admitted to doing after the referendum.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.