Slashdot Mirror


Trolls Are Still Actively Trying to Influence Brexit and US Elections (go.com)

TechCrunch reports: A major new campaign of disinformation around Brexit, designed to stir up U.K. 'Leave' voters, and distributed via Facebook, may have reached over 10 million people in the U.K., according to new research. The source of the campaign is so far unknown, and will be embarrassing to Facebook, which only this week claimed it was clamping down on "dark" political advertising on its platform. Researchers for the U.K.-based digital agency 89up allege that Mainstream Network -- which looks and reads like a "mainstream" news site but which has no contact details or reporter bylines -- is serving hyper-targeted Facebook advertisements aimed at exhorting people in Leave-voting U.K. constituencies to tell their MP to "chuck Chequers." Chequers is the name given to the U.K. Prime Ministers's proposed deal with the EU regarding the U.K.'s departure from the EU next year.
ABC News reports: When the Justice Department unsealed criminal charges detailing a yearslong effort by a Russian troll farm to "sow division and discord in the U.S. political system," it was the first federal case alleging continued foreign interference in U.S. elections. Earlier Friday, American intelligence officials released a rare public statement asserting that Russia, China, Iran and other countries are engaged in ongoing efforts to influence U.S. policy and voters in future elections. The statement didn't provide details on those efforts. That stood in contrast with the criminal charges, which provided a detailed narrative of Russian activities...

The criminal complaint provided a clear picture that there is still a hidden but powerful Russian social media effort aimed at spreading distrust for American political candidates and causing divisions on social issues such as immigration and gun control.... Court papers describe how the operatives in Friday's case would analyze U.S. news articles and decide how they would draft social media messages about those stories. They also show that Russian trolls have stepped up their efforts with a better understanding the U.S. political climate and messages that are no longer riddled with misspellings.

CNN notes that one week before America's 2016 presidential election, "one of the Kremlin-backed accounts denied that Russian meddling, saying: 'Russia's Putin says Moscow not trying to influence U.S. election.'"

50 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everybody I disagree with is a troll.

    1. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know, right! Someone else exercising their right to free speech. How dare they.

      The right to free speech is a limited right applying only to the government stopping a particular person from speaking. That's it, period.

      A troll in this context is someone who is trying to manipulate from a non honest position. They may lie about who they are or they may be telling content based lies or well all of the above.

      Now, generally I think one legitimate government should stay out of another's affairs. That should be the default position, but if they are going to influence they should be open and honest about it.

      In short this isn't a really a free speech issue. It is rather a question of honesty and integrity in the process. Democracy fails when the inputs are corrupted, hence all the effort to corrupt the inputs.

    2. Re:The truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Everyone posting about politics on Slashdot and elsewhere on the Internet is doing the same thing. This includes you, AmiMojo. Everyone wants just as badly as you do to increase the size of their tribe and gain more support from people who might be on the fence. This kind of discourse has been going on since the dawn of the Internet. Hell, this type of pseudonymous political social interaction likely predates the Internet. I would not be surprised if BBS users did the same thing, though I was too young to join that scene at the time before it fizzled out.

      This is not illegal election interference. This is people on the Internet running their mouths off about things they're passionate about. It's humanity at work. It's been going on for over 30 years and it makes you look like a fool to make a boogieman out of this non-issue.

      If you want to know what it looks like for someone to knowingly, willingly, arrogantly and mockingly violate the laws of another country's election interference laws, look no further than John Oliver, resident of the United States of America, who earned over 11 million views on YouTube and countless more via television as he and Mike Myers (axe, not knife) told viewers in Canada not to vote for Stephen Harper. This wasn't an innocent sketch, he knew exactly what he was doing and gloated about it with a wad of cash in his hand.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V5ckcTSYu8

      This is why the rest of the world has a bit of trouble taking the United States seriously when they complain about interference. The United States set themselves up on a high moral pedestal as an example for the world to follow. They probably have the worst track record of any other nation in history when it comes to meddling in foreign elections, and now they're mad that other countries *might* be trying the same thing? Don't even make me get started with what they've done to South America or Iran or any other number of examples where they utilized actual government forces rather than just celebrity opinions.

    3. Re:The truth by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone manipulates public opinion. Know what the difference today is vs 30 years ago? Now everyone can leave their own views, input, beliefs and "let the group as a whole" make the decisions as to what they're saying is good or bad. This pulls views away from the elitists, the pundits, the manipulation by the media telling you how you should view something. That control they had for decades is something they've lost.

      The most recent meme aka NPC meme is a great example of this. The political left, pundits, media just freak out over it. What's the problem with it? Well the let "claims it dehumanizes people." But...there's a problem with that. Why weren't they being banned from social media platforms when they were screeching that conservatives, libertarians, trump supporters, mad max, doug ford supporters, were all labeled as racist, neo-nazis, sexists, reacists, bigots, homophobes, white nationalists, race traitors, uncle toms, and so on.

      I'll give you your answer. Because it struck too close to home. The NPC meme is a satirical mocking of a loud-mouth leftist pundit/politicians point and those who suppor it. It becomes effective to everyone else because a person and look around at the people they draw to them, and then notice how much is full on regurgitation of these same points, in the most stupid way. Usually involving some form of attack against the persons job, family, race, sexual orientation and what not.

      Conservatives find this funny because they can and regularly engage in self-deprecating humor. Progressives do not. And in a round of "OMGROFLF" phase, Twitter banned 1500 accounts that were not violating any rule, or policy, or anything else. The reason? Nobody knows, and twitter is refusing to day why.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re: The truth by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > weak strawman. Try harder.

      The original remark is neither of those things.

      The definition of "troll" has been devalued to nothing more that "someone I disagree with" for a long time now. A lot of people can't handle the idea that someone would disagree with their particular cult.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re: The truth by poity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are conflating a natural right with the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. They are not the same. The former is broad and philosophical, the latter is narrow and legal. The latter is derived from the former and is subordinate to the former when talking about spirit and intent, as OP was.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    6. Re:The truth by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When has people spreading lies and propaganda designed to cause division and reduce the ability of citizens to effectively participate in democracy ever been acceptable?

      If you post lies, if you deliberately try to sow discord, people are going to call you out and flag up what you are doing. And we should take notice because we want to be informed and aware of the world around us, not stuck in a bubble of misinformation.

      If you want to criticise John Oliver then you need to address the things he was saying. Of course he has a right to state an opinion on the matter, what is at issue is if he is trying to add to the political discourse or deliberately trying to confuse and bullshit voters because he wants to destabilise Canada.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  2. Gullble people by riverat1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unfortunately there are a lot of gullible people in the world who just skim the headlines and don't bother to dig down in any detail on an issue. Lazy thinkers will always be with us and all we can hope for is there are enough people who aren't that way in order to counter them. Lately it's kind of depressing how much of this has distorted the political realm.

    1. Re: Gullble people by riverat1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd have to say that Hillary Clinton was one of the most qualified candidates I've every seen with experience in all sectors of the federal government. There are aspects to her politics that I don't particularly like but compared to Trump there is no comparison. And yes she isn't a particularly inspiring campaigner and made mistakes in assuming some states were safely for her when they weren't

      But then there are people who spent the last 25 years consuming the Republicans demonization of all things Clinton (I'm looking at you Cmdln Daco). Geez, you'd think if there was anything there that after spending $100s of millions of federal dollars investigating they would have come up with something serious to pin on her. I guess they think it was good spending of the money though because they ended up getting what they wanted.

    2. Re: Gullble people by Highdude702 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe the main reason Trump won is because of this "Hillary Clinton was one of the most qualified candidates I've every seen with experience in all sectors of the federal government." Were sick of career politicians. That is not what this country was founded on, and letting the politicians get rich on the backs of the people is a bad way to go. Hell look what they are doing, and yes I'm stating that the politicians WANT us to fight against each other. It just helps to entrench them some more. II say we do what china has done in the past and kill every member of government and vote new in. It would give the new an example of what not to do, so long as they didn't want their head to end up on a spike in the White House lawn.

  3. what they don't say says more than what they do by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's odd that we [the us] do it to them and it's ok, but fuck them if they do the same thing to us. God I hate politics and politicians.

    1. Re:what they don't say says more than what they do by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Nothing odd about it. Opinions are formed and spread locally in your own favour.

      Russians meddling in our elections? NO! America is too great for that!
      Americans meddling in world affairs? Of course America is great and we should do that!

  4. Re: Disinformation? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hell, Obama flew over personally to threaten Britain into voting remain and no one raised a shitfit about America "influencing" a British election.

  5. Re: Disinformation? No. by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2

    Hell, Obama flew over personally to threaten Britain into voting remain and no one raised a shitfit about America "influencing" a British election.

    To be fair, that's because Britain's our bitch.

  6. Yeah yeah by nagora · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how these trolls always affect the side the person writing the article doesn't support, isn't it? I mean, no one would dream of spreading misinformation on the Remain side - they're all saints devoted to the purity of Truth.

    I'm sure Russian trolls are feeding out misinformation about all sorts of things. The real issue is whether it has any more effect than the lies politicians tell.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Yeah yeah by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wasn't the Remain folks who had to admit after the election that they'd been lying all along.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Yeah yeah by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, no one would dream of spreading misinformation on the Remain side

      And yet they didn't. The remain side was characterised entirely by: "World isn't as bad as Leavers make out. We don't know what will happen if we vote Leave." There was no disinformation to spread.

      Unfortunately the truth was both a boring and weak argument. The Remain side's biggest fault was they didn't play a dirty game in the dirty world of politics.

    3. Re:Yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People these days are more paranoid than the US during the cold war.

      Not everything is about imaginary Russian bots. People disagree with you. Real people. Even if you cannot fathom how anyone could have another opinion, that doesn't make them trolls or bots.

    4. Re:Yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There was no disinformation to spread"
      Sure, Project Fear was completely accurate and all of its predictions have come true. Just like 89up mentioned in TFS is a completely neutral observer and not a pro-EU PR agency.

      "The Remain side's biggest fault was they didn't play a dirty game in the dirty world of politics."
      Sure, and they're still pure as the driven snow. Which is why Mainstream Network, "source of the campaign is so far unknown" couldn't possibly be a company directed by Martin Ellice, MD of the group that owns the Daily Express. And it would be impossible to find that out in 30 seconds by looking them up at Companies House.

      Face it, it's politics. If you think your side isn't spewing at least as much shit as your opposition...

    5. Re:Yeah yeah by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Remain campaigners lied repeatedly, aggressively and in a coordinated way, far more so than the Leave campaign did. It was partly the sight of the relentless lying that caused me to study the arguments for Leave more closely and eventually conclude Leave was right. They are still right.

      Here are a few lies told by the government alone in the course of the Remain campaign, let alone other campaigners:

      If you vote Leave we (Osbourne and Cameron) will punish you by passing a massive 'emergency tax'. Literally, vote wrong and we'll take all your money. A big deal for pensioners and poorer people who were more inclined to vote out. But no emergency tax happened.

      This lie wouldn't have been credible without another lie - that Cameron would stay on if he lost the vote. Cameron insisted he wouldn't resign and therefore that Osbourne and his emergency tax were guaranteed. He was lying the whole time - he resigned hours after losing.

      The tax lie was itself justified by another lie - the supposedly guaranteed recession that voting leave would trigger, due to the "uncertainty" created by the two year negotiation period. The Treasury knew they were lying, that's why they refused to show its models or how it measured "uncertainty". We know this was a lie because two years after the vote the economy is booming. There was no "uncertainty hit" at all.

      The recession lie was supported by yet another lie - the supposed cast iron consensus amongst economists that Brexit = Insta-Recession. No such consensus existed: before the vote economists like Patrick Minford were highlighting how absurd the claims where and immediately after the vote, the Bank of England's chief economist stated that the reputation of economics was in tatters. Nobel laureate Paul Krugman stated the idea of an uncertainty triggered employment bloodbath was "motivated reasoning" and Mervyn King (former head of the BoE) said the government had been talking nonsense.

      Notice a pattern here - the Remain campaign built a tower of lies that all supported each other and which have all been disproven in the years since. I'm not even getting into all the other stupid claims they made and are still making today. Just the basics were enough to seriously tilt things in their favour.

      Finally, your own post is itself a lie. The Leave campaigners haven't "admitted they'd been lying all along".

    6. Re:Yeah yeah by rl117 · · Score: 2

      The fact that these models were deliberately and knowingly biased was brought up in parliament just a few weeks back.

    7. Re: Yeah yeah by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Funny

      People these days are more paranoid than the US during the cold war.

      Not everything is about imaginary Russian bots.

      Aha! Got you! That's exactly the kind of thing a Russian bot would say!

    8. Re:Yeah yeah by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah yeah. Funny how the Brexiteers always counter with vague accusations of lies but can somehow never be specific.

      Remain didn't make a compete lie the cornerstone of their entire campaign. Brexit camp knew it was a lie yet plastered it in the side of a bus and paraded it around the county.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Yeah yeah by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Half of what you say was actually Vote Leave lies, e.g. the claim that there would be an instant recession was an exaggeration that they turned in to a talking point for their "Project Fear" story. And of course the whole point about Project Fear was to make you ignore the experts who were giving you factual information and realistic predictions with caveats.

      But really those are relatively small things, bad predictions, compared to what leave campaigners lied about. For example, Farage was promoting the Norway model (EEA membership) as being an ideal outcome and something we should welcome, but now claims it would be a betrayal and a disaster. The "Brexit Bonus" money we would stop sending to the EU has all vanished into mitigating the losses and replicating institutions and subsidies that are going away. Worse still, even at the time the £350m/week figure was known to be a fabrication but they didn't remove it from that bloody bus.

      There were lots of specific promises about what leaving would mean, things like staying in the single market and customs union, about making immigration easier (!) for non-EU citizens and the like which were all reneged on within hours of the result.

      More over there were decades of lies supporting them. I remember a few weeks after the vote there was a woman on Question Time who said she was thinking of voting remain but the day before saw some bananas in the supermarket, and was reminded of the "straight bananas" Euro Myth. That apparently changed her mind, despite it being a well known lie that has been debunked continually since the 90s when it first appeared.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:Yeah yeah by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2

      Why should they take any responsibility for a mess? They didn't cause these problems.

      Indeed, the idea that the EU is so unreasonable and hard to deal with that we must leave is exactly what Brexiteers have been arguing for years, and they were repeatedly ignored. Instead ever more power was given to Brussels by pro-EU politicians, powers the EU now isn't hesitating to use to create as many problems as possible for the UK.

      As far as I can tell, if the Brexiteers had been more influential, if they had been able to throw the brakes on EU integration or partially reverse it without the EU forcing a full exit as a consequence, things would be a lot more peaceful and a lot more reasonable. They had the option when Cameron tried to renegotiate. However, the EU only recognises one option as being legitimate - total and complete submission ("integration") to the will of Brussels. Any attempt to negotiate a partial integration or partial collaboration simply makes them start shitting about cherries.

    11. Re:Yeah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You couldn't be more wrong if you tried, you're just trying to justify being part of the UK's flagrant downfall as a result of Brexit.

      "If you vote Leave we (Osbourne and Cameron) will punish you by passing a massive 'emergency tax'. Literally, vote wrong and we'll take all your money. A big deal for pensioners and poorer people who were more inclined to vote out. But no emergency tax happened."

      A number of tax increases have already occurred as a result of fiscal tightening due to Brexit, notably taxes on self-employed are drastically up. The next budget due in a couple of weeks looks set to tax the mainstream even more. Remain was right.

      "The Treasury knew they were lying, that's why they refused to show its models or how it measured "uncertainty". We know this was a lie because two years after the vote the economy is booming. There was no "uncertainty hit" at all."

      What fucking rock do you live under? The UK as a result of the Brexit vote has gone from being the fastest growing G7 economy to the slowest growing G7 economy, we're barely breaking 1% growth whilst our peers such as the US which we were growing faster than are breaking 4% growth. At a time where the global economy has sped up, the British economy has slowed down. Furthermore, the pound has plummetted 40% in value, which has necessarily forced the price of every day goods such as petrol way up. The last time petrol was at 130p was when oil was at $120 per barrel, it's only at $80 per barrel now it's hit that level again and petrol tax has been frozen for the period, literally the only reason petrol is as high again is because of the collapse of the pound, which is stone hard real. A number of companies have cancelled UK investment, and a bunch more have already moved jobs overseas. What fucking crackpot world do you live in if you think any of this is proof that the economy didn't suffer when it clearly has and will so even more with hard Brexit? Remain was right.

      "Notice a pattern here - the Remain campaign built a tower of lies that all supported each other and which have all been disproven in the years since. I'm not even getting into all the other stupid claims they made and are still making today. Just the basics were enough to seriously tilt things in their favour."

      I notice that you've no idea what the fuck is going on around you that's for sure - you've not even noticed how badly UK growth is suffering to the point you naively think the economy is booming. If 1.5% annualised growth is booming then please don't speak to anyone ever again, you're way too uneducated to have a discussion about anything ever, but that's probably not surprising from a leave voter.

      "Finally, your own post is itself a lie. The Leave campaigners haven't "admitted they'd been lying all along"."

      Incorrect. Farage admitted the $350million a week for the NHS was an outright lie on the very morning of the referendum result, as has Michael Gove. The idea that the EU would easily give us what you want has similarly been proven wrong. Arguments that immigration would be halted have been destroyed by Brexiteers like Pritti Patel who admits she always wanted higher immigration, just from countries like Bangladesh with significant Islamic populations, rather than from our much more culturally align European neighbours.

      It doesn't matter anyway, even if we do leave the EU it's clear it won't be for long. The tide has already turned, voters are firmly against Brexit at this point, and it was only ever the old racists generation that supported it anyway in the most, and they're dying out, at such a fast rate in fact that demographically the death of old racists alone has been enough to inherently switched the referendum result, much less with the fact Leave's lies and illegal funding from Russia have now been exposed.

      All the same, you should be ashamed of yourself by supporting Russia's goal of punishing us in response to UK sanctions over Crimea by similarly trying to harm our economy through it's widespread funding of Brex

  7. Yeah The Horror by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine people actually able to see differing points of view. They might just decide they don't like what their betters have planned for them

  8. The politicians are just as bad by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember two years ago, in the poll booth, about to vote for/against Brexit; I was trying to sum up what the campaigns had told me. I came to the conclusion: a mass of emotional froth, little of hard reality upon which to make a decision. All sorts of contradictory predictions; few agreed facts. I remember listening to opposing politicians who could not even agree on, what should have been, basic facts. I came to the conclusion that both sides were lying (or at least greatly playing up their arguments), many others did also. The main agreement was that 'the other side are not being truthful' -- both sides said that!

    Two years later: it is not hugely better. The problems that Brexit may bring have now been revealed & are being shouted loud but no one can say what will happen on 29 March 2019 (Brexit day), partly because exaggeration of dire consequence is a tool of political negotiation. The promised sunny uplands of EU-restriction free international trade are also being promised, but are nebulous.

    Debate amongst politicians is at a level that would bring discredit to a bunch of squabbling 4 year olds at infant school.

    1. Re:The politicians are just as bad by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Taking yourself out of a free trade block with your most significant trading partners is bad is lying?

      The UK in the EU is a major player, on its own it is just a small country is lying?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:The politicians are just as bad by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

      Which British political parties are talking about kicking out Italians who have been here a decade? Because I'm pretty sure there are none: they've all said anyone already here can stay indefinitely.

      Rees-Mogg, our prime minister-in-waiting (and if Corbyn has taught us anything it's that backbench MPs can become leaders unexpectedly), has said exactly that https://www.metro.news/rees-mo...

      Your "fear" isn't justified by anything real, which rather proves Cederic's point.

      That's easy to say, but the consequences for me if you are wrong are catestrophic.

      And if there isn't anything to worry about, why haven't we had a unilateral declaration? It's all tied up in "nothing's agreed until it's all agreed", which is getting more and more sketchy as time goes on. A no deal Brexit by default will revoke all those people's right to stay, and action will have to be taken to give them it. How can there be nothing to worry about if the default state for April next year is 3 million people's status become's illegal?

      As for the extremist overlords, you realise it's the EU itself that insists on a two year exit period during which partial de-integration is completely disallowed?

      And it's the UK government that is desperate to get it all wrapped up before the next election. Or do you think a 21 month transition period is realistic?

      And that it's the EU that has been responsible for the total lack of progress so far?

      That's highly debatable. They have their rules, and a plethora of current options of integration or independence currently exist. Creating a new one for the UK isn't in their interests, even if what the UK was asking for made sense and in some cases it's hard to see how it can work. How is the Irish border solved by current UK proposals? Wishful thinking.

      I'm not going to over-defend the EU, but they have their position and very little incentive to be nice to the UK especially given how they have been negotiated with.

  9. No election, no fake news and not trolling by msgmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have not posted for a few years but this one really has annoyed me enough to say something regarding these Brexit ads.

    For a start there are no new elections or referendums so it's hardly trying to influence a vote, the Guardian (left wing) newspaper would love to have a second referendum and reverse the vote and is most likely why they have flagged this up.

    I can see how not knowing who is paying for these ads may be a problem for some, but like I said there is no public vote coming up and therefore as far as a I know campaign financing rules do apply, besides I did not see the Guardian kick up a fuss when Soros donated £400,000 to reverse Brexit.

    Finally a large chunk of Conservative (the governing party) MPs themselves have said the same thing that this advert is saying so how is this fake news?

    If there was any semblance that there was democracy in the UK, it has pretty much has been laid to rest.

    1. Re:No election, no fake news and not trolling by skam240 · · Score: 2

      "If there was any semblance that there was democracy in the UK, it has pretty much has been laid to rest."

      I was following you until this last part. Brexit was literally directly voted on by the people of the UK. I think it was a dumb idea to leave but that's very clearly democracy in action

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  10. Re: Disinformation? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While this sort of thing is typically frowned upon -- you both are being a bit silly, in that you're missing the point.

    That was an *open*, and *plainly visible* thing. That is not even remotely the same as people pretending to be real users, genuine citizens, and instead being paid for foreigners, pretending to belong to the country they are trying to destroy.

    If Trump, Putin, anyone tries to OPENLY say "Vote this way!", that has no bearing on this conversation, on this topic. It is instead, the goal of secretly funding, and secretly trying to destroy a foreign power via trickery that is the problem. A problem, that really only democracies are vulnerable to, for in a fascist state (like Russia, or China), if you dissent? You're in trouble period.

    Where as the citizens of a democracy? Have the RIGHT to complain...

    Meanwhile, we have sneaks, spies, paid for people FAKING belonging to the citizenry of democratic nations. That's a very, very dangerous thing to do to a democracy.

  11. The politicians are just as bad by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember, the the poll booth 2 years ago, trying sum up what I had learned from what the politicians has said over the preceding weeks. I remembered a huge amount of emotional froth but little by way of solid detail or summary of what would happen. I had listened to debates between politicians who could not even agree on basic contemporary facts - that should have not been hard to ascertain. The misinformation was more than political spin: it was outright lies. I am not the only one of that opinion.

    The only agreement between the sides was 'the other side is lying'.

    Now, two years later, things are not much better. We have been told of all sorts of horrible things that will happen after 29 March 2019 (Brexit day) but are well aware that these are being played up. Both sides have too much to lose if the hard lines being talked about come to be. Exaggeration of consequences and declarations of impossibility seem to be the way that political negotiations are done. The bright sunny post Brexit uplands, that we are assured (by the Brexiteers) will come to be, are equally nebulous.

    What passes as debate between politicians would bring discredit to a bunch of squabbling 4 year olds at infant school.

  12. Re:Define trolls by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

    China, Russia and Iran could hire teams of people to write news articles with bylines and promote them overtly, that's fine. China Daily, RT, Tehran times, are good examples.

    Trolls aren't concerned with even writing news articles, not even slanted, biased news articles, the truth is immaterial to their objective, and certain truths run contrary to their objective. The trolls themselves pretend to be somebody else to disrupt conversations, recruit followers and expand their influence. They focus not on informing people, but on polarization and division. They're paid to do this, for this purpose.

    https://tinyurl.com/y9dby46f

    "Topic: NATO troops are embedded with Ukrainian armed forces

    Keywords: ukraine news, russia and ukraine, ukraine policy, ukraine, NATO, PMC (private military company)

    Task: Raise this topic on 35 municipal forums

    Work begins after an initial post, written by a troll in a different department, is published on the LiveJournal social-networking site under the username flcrbgrjn. The post argues that foreign mercenaries are fighting on the side of Ukrainian soldiers and links to a video that purports to show two American soldiers in the southeastern Ukrainian city of Mariupol...."

  13. People voted to exit by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    They stood inline and got to vote.
    The votes got counted.
    The government then had take on what was voted for and that was passed.
    Citizens all over the UK voted to get their laws back from the EU and to fully enjoy been normal nation of laws again.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: People voted to exit by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      Why is democracy a bad "idea" AC? Citizens got asked a question and the government had to respect that vote on leaving the EU.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re: People voted to exit by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      No the Government didn't have to respect the vote: it was advisory. If it wasn't advisory then they'd have to have re run it by law because of the election fraud.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:People voted to exit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      1. We are not getting our laws back, the proposal is to do trade deals with other nations like the US who have already said they will demand changes to British law, e.g. to food standards. Plus we will likely stay pretty close to the EU rules so we can keep selling to them anyway, except with no say in them.

      2. The referendum was on the single point of EU membership. We were assured it would not affect our membership of the single market or customs union. The most prominent Leave campaigners said that repeatedly, particular Farage with his support of the "Norway model". This is not what we are not getting.

      3. In a democracy everyone has the right to change their mind. Otherwise elections would appoint people for life terms. Given the importance of this change and that the change being proposes it neither what was promised or what anyone wants, remainer or Brexiteer, it seems reasonable to put it to the country.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re: People voted to exit by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Democracy is a fine idea, but doesn't just depend on votes. It depends on choices made by informed voters. The Brexit voters were deliberately misinformed by the side that won, which it admitted to doing after the referendum.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  14. Re: Common reasoning... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's all underrated. (Except the stuff I believe in, of course)

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  15. Hillary! and the Dems need an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The "deplorables" and "bitter clingers" can't be allowed to win elections.

  16. Re:What? "Trolls"? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    Holy false dichotomy, Batman!

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  17. Re: what they don't say says more than what they by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    In the US, you can run against the incumbent and very likely not get shot.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  18. Re: Disinformation? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What difference does it make if some particular bit of bullshit propaganda comes from Russia or Enron or the CIA or the DNC/RNC or whoever? The message is what's important, not the messenger. You say they want to "destabilize" the system? Well so do I. That's why I voted for Trump, because the system fucking sucks. And now that they're out of power, the left wants to destabilize things too. After exhausting every lega possibility for removing Trump they've resorted to open violence and calls for dismantling the government itself. Did Russia get us to that place, or did CNN and the Kochs/Soros and all the other rich, american sociopaths behind 99.999% of the political so-called information people are exposed to?

    You're holding up the trivial fact that someone lied about their country of origin in the standard course of lying about a hundred other things to push a political agenda as the big, bright dividing line. The nationality of the person who created a meme or article or whatever else is the absolute last part of the equation I give a fuck about. If some Russians in a basement somewhere on a shoestring budget can out-persuade billions of dollars worth of the best professional advertising people America has to offer, then more power to them. If that's the case, maybe they deserve to run the world after all.

    Or maybe you're just desperate for a scapegoat to explain away your failure and are far, far less immune to paranoid bigotry than you like to think.

  19. UK government cheating dwarfs this by divec · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to keep pro-Brexit Facebook ads in perspective:

    • The UK government spent more than Vote Leave's entire legal spending limit on a pro-Remain leaflet
    • They enlisted Obama to state (incorrectly, it turns out) that the UK would be at the "back of the queue" for a trade deal
    • They enlisted the IMF to state (incorrectly, it turns out) that a Leave vote would result in a recession by 2017
    • Serious consideration is being given to a second referendum to overturn the first, which would never have happened if the result had been the other way — even if the EU continued its rapid evolution into a superstate
    • much more

    This level of gaming the system clearly dwarfs a few Facebook ads

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  20. Re: Why are we still talking by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

    "The wrong side" won, and all the smartest people in the room will never get over it.

    Plus, their globalist masters have immense wealth to support the hue and cry.

  21. Using the "T" word by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is not very nice calling people Trolls....call them by their real name. Socialists, Communists, Progressives, Liberals, The Left, Anti-fa, Facists, totalitarians, Democratic Socialists.
    If none work for you try "Douche Canoes"

  22. Re: Disinformation? No. by jader3rd · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hell, Obama flew over personally to threaten Britain into voting remain and no one raised a shitfit about America "influencing" a British election.

    He went over as himself and argued for his ideas. This is different. Russian posing as a Brit is different than the American President coming over as the American President. Obama making his pitch is him trying to win an argument. These Russion propogandists don't care about any side of the argument, they're trying to create division and sow misinformation. Is it really that hard to see the difference?

  23. If Americans weren't so fucking stupid by DougDot · · Score: 2

    The trolling would not work.