Slashdot Mirror


TSA Lays Out Plans To Use Facial Recognition For Domestic Flights (theverge.com)

The TSA has released its roadmap to use biometrics technology in the coming years. The Verge reports: Customs and Border Protection has been using facial recognition to screen non-U.S. residents on international flights since 2015, a project that was expedited by the Trump administration. Last year, the U.S. government laid out its plans to start expanding the screening tools to U.S. citizens, which would require them to undergo facial scans when they leave the country through a system called the Biometric Pathway. Today's news lays out how the TSA will adopt the same technology, partnering with CBP on biometrics for international travelers, expanding security operations to TSA Precheck members, and eventually, using facial recognition to verify domestic travelers.

TSA says that by moving toward facial recognition technology in a time where travel volume is rising, it's hoping to reduce the need for physical documents like passports and paper tickets. Currently, TSA manually compares the passengers in front of them to their ID photos, but it believes an automated process that can match facial images to photos from passports and visa applications will be more accurate and efficient.

171 comments

  1. Old... by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

    Next...

    --
    sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    1. Re:Old... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Next...

      Really. I thought this was done years ago. Every time I have passed through customs they asked me to look in the camera. Starting about two years ago, it is just a kiosk. I insert my passport open to the photo page, look in the camera with my eyes lined up on the dots, and push the button. It prints a paper receipt, which I hand to the nice man with the gun, and then I walk out the door. The system is almost totally automated, and since there are plenty of kiosks, the line moves fast.

      At least that is how it works at SJC, SFO, and HNL. Haven't gone through customs anywhere else recently.

  2. I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After they sent him to the "cargo" section, the facial scanner there said "Hey! Barbapapas are not allowed!"

    1. Re:I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbapapa seems like a happy, friendly character.

      Why are certain people obsessed with Creimer on this site? Surely not giving a shit about him would be the logical course of action.

    2. Re:I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've asked a young local metal band to make a song about your videos.

    3. Re:I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think I'm going to click on your link you must be out of your fucking mind.

    4. Re: I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The creimertard posts are the work of forum disruption trolls. Their modus operandi is to derail any discussion that departs from the approved Establishment narrative.

      Many suspect their troll farm is funded by either Soros NGOs or US government domestic propaganda operations.

    5. Re:I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look around, and you'll see that "not giving a shit" is what usually happens when someone post creimer stuff. Don't give a shit - about the trolls.

    6. Re: I heard creimer tried to take a plane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one gives a fuck about Creimer. That's why he posts to Slashdot in the first place. Most of the posts about him are actually just him trolling himself. Sort of how Trump refers to himself in the third person. He has some severe mental issues. Ironically, Creimer makes Trump look thin.

  3. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global entry was absolutely fantastic to get, so automate more.

    1. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ol' fashioned Lexus Lanes, if you have money then of course you're not a threat!

    2. Re: Good by Venona2018 · · Score: 1

      Good ol' fashioned Lexus Lanes, if you have money then of course you're not a threat!



      Global Entry is $100 and is good for 5 years - that's $20 a year, or less than the cost of checking a single bag. It also give you TSA Pre-Check. Chances are that if you can afford to fly internationally, you can afford $20/year.
  4. Show us the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is worse than delusional, it's actually abdication of responsibility 'who checked?', 'the machine', 'oh well can't sue the machine or blame anyone when a security event occurs, our overpaid jobs are safe'
    At the same time who's getting a fat backhander for supplying the hardware/software.

  5. I didn't say it by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I didn't say that the TSA were a bunch of goose-stepping bully Nazi thugs armed with technology the Gestapo only dreamed of.
    Oh. Wait. Yes I did.

    1. Re:I didn't say it by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

      The TSA is populated by the typical government goon that cannot be fired.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    2. Re:I didn't say it by kpainter · · Score: 1

      Papers please. Nevermind, just hold still for a photo.

    3. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. I'll one-up you. Are you malicious? Never mind, hold still (or not, it won't matter) while we DNA swab that cup you touched and while we make assumptions about what various DNA markers mean.

    4. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Constitutionally they would not be able to scan your face if you just say:
      "Having my face scanned and stored in a computer is against my spiritual and/or religious beliefs."

      Or just break out the KISS/Sting/Crow make-up. If the cameras don't have IR filters, you could also wear a necklace with IR LEDs to blind them.

    5. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      while we make assumptions about what various DNA markers mean.

      Hey, if you find any 'indian' in there, can I open a casino?

    6. Re:I didn't say it by terrycarlino · · Score: 2

      Sure do all that. Just don't expect to get on a plane afterwards. Because flying is not a constitutionally protected right. No one has to fly on an airplane. It's entirely voluntary.

      Personally I avoid it when ever possible. At work I tell them I have the Mississippi rule. If they want me to travel for work and the destination is east of the Mississippi then I expect to be paid mileage or get a rental car and drive. The time comes out of my normal salaried hours and they can pad a day on each end. Never been a problem for them. I expect most times a plane ticket would be just as expensive.

      I can't always avoid flying for work, but I certainly avoid it for non-work activities, and do. Pretty much no where I need to go that I can't drive. I realize everyone isn't in this position, but I am and I won't deal with TSA's security theater any more than I absolutely have to.

    7. Re: I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as we keep finding pedobears the tsa will never have a staff shortage problem

    8. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the cameras don't have IR filters, you could also wear a necklace with IR LEDs to blind them.

      Do you remember the girl who nearly got shot because she was wearing a Clock T-Shirt?

      Wearing electronics that TSA doesn't recognize is a bad idea.

      Also, this isn't an opt-in system. Expect to have to go through the scanning area until they get a good picture.

    9. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TSA is populated by the typical government goon that cannot be fired.

      They can be killed, however. If it becomes dangerous enough nobody will work for the TSA no matter how much they pay.

    10. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you remember the girl who nearly got shot because she was wearing a Clock T-Shirt?

      Wearing electronics that TSA doesn't recognize is a bad idea.

      Terrible story that. And people somehow seems to think it was "reckless" of her to walk through an airport with a LED display. What is wrong with people? And with security guards - you'd think they should know better than idiots who have seen countdown timers in Bond movies.

      The situation is better in Europe. We have xray machines and random searches in airports - but odd electronics does not seem to be a problem. I always wear my SolderTime watch when travelling by plane. I sometimes have loose circuit boards & wires in my luggage too. (My pc broke down, tried to fix it while on vacation. Lacked equipment, so brought it back in pieces.)

      I refuse to consider it 'reckless' to carry a powered hobby electronic project through an international airport and onto a plane - and I keep doing it to make sure we don't get that kind of security madness here. So far, they have confiscated a few forgotten water bottles, while completely ignoring my electronics. As they should. I used to pass waiting time taking pictures with my DSLR, but that resulted in too many boring pictures of gates and other banal airport architecture. So I had to stop.

    11. Re: I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you willing to lead by example, shitboi, or are you all talk and no walk? Come on, go and kill some TSA agents. We're waiting here.

    12. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TSA is populated by the typical government goon that cannot be fired.

      The TSA is populated by the typical government (goose-stepping) goon that cannot be fired.

      There. Fixed it.

    13. Re:I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while we make assumptions about what various DNA markers mean.

      Hey, if you find any 'indian' in there, can I open a casino?

      If the Indian refers to the overseas variety, The Border Patrol would like to have a word with you.

    14. Re: I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, we didn't find any indian. Only middle-east variants. You're going to be tried for crimes against America in Guantanamo. Prepare to be water boarded.

    15. Re: I didn't say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know that he hasn't already?

  6. The TSA is why I don't fly. by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't be sexually molested by a government goon. So until the TSA goes away I won't go anywhere my Tacoma won't take me.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Except that the same TSA goons that you see at airports are not only doing the same checks are the borders with Mexico and Canada but now they are doing random checks on the highways as well.

    2. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by jpaine619 · · Score: 3

      I've had the pat down and it is not even close to being molested. It's a pat down which is used to check for trace amounts of chemicals which are contained in things that go boom.

      You sound like you have a pretty serious case of Stockholm Syndrome...

      My guess is that you're a closet faggot and you're afraid a pat down will awaken your desires to suck cock

      Someone is obviously projecting.....

    3. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't be sexually molested by a government goon.

      But for some us that is our sex life.

    4. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So did many people around the world.

      I gave up visiting the US since 9/11. Not because of terrorist (the risk is too low to worry about), but because of the draconian out-of-proportion rules implemented afterwards, plus the trigger-happy culture of the US LEO. Any innocent foreigner has a much higher risk of being "accidentally" killed by US LEO than by a terrorist.

      Plus the TSA molestation is unavoidable. Not going to visit the US as long as TSA is in the way, which probably means not again in my lifetime. That's fine, there are over 100 countries in the world I haven't visited yet, and I don't think I have enough time in my life to visit them all.

    5. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've had the pat down and it is not even close to being molested. It's a pat down which is used to check for trace amounts of chemicals which are contained in things that go boom.

      So tell me, is "sliding hands up your leg until resistance" important because there are crotch chemicals that go boom?

      It takes less than 60 seconds and is not a big deal

      The big deal is that there is no way in hell it will actually catch a terrorist, and in 17 years (so far) it never has!

    6. Re: The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with these deranged closet homosexual Establishment bootlickers? Is that really what drinking too much soy milk does to a person?

    7. Re: The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was sexually assaulted as a child. I will not allow another person to fondle my testicles just because they think I am smuggling drugs or whathaveyou

      If I want to work through my childhood issues I'll hire a professional.

      Until then I avoid US airports

    8. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I won't be sexually molested by a government goon. So until the TSA goes away I won't go anywhere my Tacoma won't take me.

      My friend, a 35 year old white male with tattoos, got checked for explosives at an airport by a middle eastern female security guard. You really have to appreciate the irony of that.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    9. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because you clearly need to be a younger white male to be a terrorist
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      FWIW, I'm 60, white and male...no tattoos, and have a registered Global Entry number, and yet I was recently stopped for extra screening.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re: The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    11. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I was recently stopped for extra screening.

      By a muslim woman for an explosive check? It's not the age I'm pointing out, just that it seems like one giant wind up of western culture so that we're always just below the threshold of going crazy and the absurdity of it all.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    12. Re: The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar. If you were really assaulted you would have had a police report filled out by yourself or your loving parents. Enough with the lying. You wanted it if it even happened, which many people are saying it didn't.

    13. Re:The TSA is why I don't fly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I elect to receive the pat down every time I fly. It takes longer than 60 seconds and is to check for weapons or anything else you've tried to hide on your body. The chemical check is just something extra they can do so they do it. I don't agree with the security policies, but if you consider it as being molested then you have a very warped mind.

  7. flying cars or grounded aircraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why in am i considered a pedestrian until ive waived benefits of said regulations that a corporation has a supposed right to exercise upon me when i have no contract other than an implied premise? Admistrative Procedures Act is supposed to stop that from happening but what of bag handlers being regulated as common carriers?

    The terrorists were had no criminal history, regulated with current certs and one act to complete. I admire them more than the US Government; likewise it isnt regulations that resolve violent confrontations but manly firmness: an armed citizen has been more effective than facial recognition or is the technology a rehash of The Hillary Clinton Assassination List that the Portland Antifa or Mandalay Bay Hotel Antifa need to assume on everyone?

    1. Re:flying cars or grounded aircraft? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      AC Re The terrorists were had no criminal history.
      They usually have support networks, people to get them into a part of a nation.
      Cash, a safe place to live and transport. A place of religion that is supportive.
      Wider faith based support networks.
      All people who show up on CCTV with interesting people.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:flying cars or grounded aircraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "why in am i considered a pedestrian"
      Until you can learn to form a properly constructed English language sentence your rights will continue to be violated. Get used to it.

    3. Re: flying cars or grounded aircraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you going on about, idiot?

  8. And THIS is how it goes by p51d007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It started with the TSA...full body search, FOR YOUR SAFETY. It continued with full body scans, FOR YOUR SAFETY. It continued with "Real ID", FOR YOUR SAFETY. Now, facial recognition, FOR YOUR SAFETY. Where does it end? Implanted bio chips of course.

    1. Re:And THIS is how it goes by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Hardly.. Bio Chips are one step from the end.. Mental reconditioning would be the last step. Ya know.. to rid you of disruptive thoughts..

    2. Re: And THIS is how it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wingnut anti-Trump partisans sure do have contempt for personal freedom.

    3. Re:And THIS is how it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It started with the TSA...full body search, FOR YOUR SAFETY.
      It continued with full body scans, FOR YOUR SAFETY.
      It continued with "Real ID", FOR YOUR SAFETY.
      Now, facial recognition, FOR YOUR SAFETY.

      Where does it end? Implanted bio chips of course.

      They already have a picture of us in a database (the ID).
      They already make us wait at checkpoints to match our face to it.

      The rage at a computer doing this is manufactured by trolls.

    4. Re:And THIS is how it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "for your safety".

      After the 'Royal We' of old, and the 'Royal America' of Trump ... finally the 'Royal Your' of TSA's owners.

    5. Re:And THIS is how it goes by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 1

      Where we're going... we don't NEED the Fourth Amendment.

  9. SAME HERE by p51d007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not to mention, the few places I travel to, are within 6 hours, and given how much time you have to waste, getting to the airport hours early, going through the violations of your rights (TSA), plus the hassle getting out of the airport, plus, being packed onto a plane like sardines, I would rather just drive there anyway. I enjoy driving, seeing the scenery, listening to the music...I'll drive first!

    1. Re: SAME HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man I see these comments and I think okay this guy is content making his salary and 401k. Others don't want to work a minute longer than we need to and are juggling 3 full-time remote jobs. When you are asked to travel, you gladly bend over and cough as your balls are tickled because first class for free, why not?

    2. Re:SAME HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The largest domestic market in the world – the US – saw annual RPK growth increase to a five-month high of 5.6% in July – some way above the five-year average (4.2%). Passenger traffic is currently trending upwards strongly, supported by increasing momentum in the US economy."

      That is quoted from the IATA passenger reports (q.v. per Google). 2018 is another year of above-average growth in the demand for air travel, led strongly by the Russians with double-digit growth--but America doing well too.

  10. Your rage is directed at the wrong place by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    you're made at the barely-more-than-min-wage drone that runs the computers. You should be mad at the Aristocracy that is abusing you through those computers.

    I should also add that your misplace anger is not an accident

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you're made at the barely-more-than-min-wage drone that runs the computers."

      Actually I'm mad at people who can't proof read.

    2. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I say that most big-city TSA employees are big-city niggas with a taste of power over suburban white folks, you're just gonna get mad at me, whether it's essentially correct or not.

    3. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Anger to both is justified. Nuremberg, pretty much, codified the idea that "I was following orders" is not a valid defense to violations of the law (international or domestic).

      Realistically a whole lot would have to change before we, the citizenry, could place TSA officials/employees on trial.. But... I'm just sayin'.....

    4. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Is. Wow. I never looked at it like that. That explains so much and I can't even be mad.

    5. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      you're made at the barely-more-than-min-wage drone that runs the computers.

      They make a lot more than minimum wage. Prior to 9/11 the security was run by the airlines. But in the aftermath they were replaced by unionized government employees earning nearly twice as much. Many tests have shown that there was no increase in effectiveness at detecting prohibited items, despite the slower process and newer equipment.

    6. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like TSA agents committing genocide, murder, rape, robbery and other atrocities? Did that happen? No.

      Please pick up a fucking book on the nazi party and read about what they did. Then stop comparing goddamn bureaucrats in uniform with no police powers to murderous thugs. Perhaps if the left in this country were actually educated instead of making false and defamatory comparisons we could have a conversation. But the left have dropped to the level of children by throwing tantrums and assuming everyone who does not agree with them must be a nazi. It is pathetic and sad. But they will continue to lose elections unless they grow up.

    7. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      no increase in effectiveness

      That's a curious way of writing "a decrease in effectiveness"

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    8. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything the Nazis did was FULLY LAWFUL. See, rule of law isn't worth shit when your laws are evil.

    9. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      papersplease.org

    10. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is often forgotten that Hitler got elected.

      Such is the danger of democracy - you have responsibility for what you vote for.

    11. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of Germans voted the other party, but Hindenburg didn't want trouble and appointed Hitler. Had he had a functioning army and the will to use it, he would have crushed the nazis. Don't blame democracy, blame cowardice.

    12. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where socialism always leads rsilvergun.

      You like to call it the aristocracy as if you’re some sort of noble hero. But oppression is always from the collected powers under central control. China, Venezeuela, Cuba are all controlled by the Aristocracy of their nations.

    13. Re:Your rage is directed at the wrong place by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Entry level TSA agents make $12-$18/hr (https://www.federallawenforcement.org/tsa/). While that is certainly higher than the federal minimum wage of $7.25/hr, it is very much in line with what people make for unskilled labor jobs in urban markets all across the country. It's definitely lower than the median wage of $21/hr. And with a median wage of $22/hr for law enforcement (https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Police_Officer/Salary/9d8677f9/Entry-Level), I'd say the TSA pay rate is pretty abysmal, even if it is higher than their private sector predecessors' pay. Also of note: it's NOT higher than the current pay rates for private sector security guards, which is $13-$17 (https://www1.salary.com/Security-Guard-hourly-wages.html). If the airports were being staffed by non-unionized, private sector personnel.

      The question of whether they are similarly effective at detecting prohibited items is also hard to settle since these days so many more items are prohibited. In fact, one might argue that the deluge of newly prohibited items is actually making it harder to detect actual threats. I mean, seriously, it's not the TSA screeners who decided that shoes and belt buckles and bottles of shampoo all needed to be deemed potential threats. And the even harder question to solve is whether the enhanced screening techniques have worked as deterrents to actual terrorists. Any idiot with a motor vehicle can commit a terrorist act and get instantaneous worldwide coverage these days. Why bother trying to evade airport security at all at this point?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    14. Re: Your rage is directed at the wrong place by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      They didn't vote for the "the other party". They voted for a bunch of other parties, 5 or 6 of which got meaningful numbers of votes. The Nazis won more seats than any other party in the July 1932 elections with 37% of the vote. No party could put together a governing coalition, though, and new elections were called for November. In the November elections the Nazis only got 33% of the vote, but were still the largest party.

      It is normal for the largest party to form government. Hindenburg and von Papen gave Hitler the chancellorship in a coalition government with the Nazis and the German National Peoples Party.

      Of course, 2 months later Hitler made himself dictator and the rest is history.

  11. Think of the criminals that get found by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Illegal migrants who thought their "state" issued ID would always be good enough.
    A large amount of tax not paid?
    Stayed in the USA past too long as a "tourist"
    Working in the USA under the wrong type of visa with photo ID from the place of work?
    Wanted criminals who thought their new ID would work in all states and be ready for any federal database.
    People using too many different versions of fake ID in different states.
    A person who created an new ID back in the 1970's and who used that to collect federal and state ID under that new name.
    People who created new state ID and then expect not to get found.
    Getting a university education loan under a fake name. Working under a fake name. Working using certifications under a fake name.
    Illegal migrants/citizens getting different city/state and federal gov support under different names all over the USA.

    Once names, faces and details in a state to get shared all over the USA a lot of past "privacy" that kept databases in a state only will offer no protection for easy fake ID creation.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re: Think of the criminals that get found by mSparks43 · · Score: 2

      eh?
      facial recognition wont help with that, any more than photo id. in fact computers are even less reliable at recognising faces than people.

    2. Re: Think of the criminals that get found by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "facial recognition wont help with that, any more than photo id"
      People have to have some ID going back to a gov issued ID. Thats all that has to be found in anther name. That is not found as it was never created in another database.
      Normal citizens will have interconnected federal and state database data set and a few images.
      Illegal immigrants, criminals and people trying to create a new fake ID will not have the existing database use to support their new state "issued" ID.

      Creating an entire past in the US to build a new ID on with images is more complex as more data sets are getting linked and referenced in real time.
      The trick of using a state issued ID to show citizenship is not going to hold for decades federally as it once was expected.
      The face has to match every past federal and state ID issued under that name, with the same sets data and as a photo.
      Thats a lot of work in 2018 to create or change considering some of the text only data sets of the 1950-70's.
      State "issued" ID to create fake citizenship, a life that is not criminal is not going to work as easy as it did in the past once faces have to match a lot of very different databases.
      Different state, federal, police, private database set are all getting linked. A person who was ever seen using a different ID set is going to get detected.
      For education, work ID, government support payments, opening a bank account, every driver or passenger ever seen in a HIDTA area :) A face at a mall using a different CC.
      The 1970-80's privacy laws that kept state and federal databases separated are still law for citizens but can criminals moving around the USA expect to not be found?
      Everything is slowly getting connected and will have to match the face on a moving around.
      The face is one data set that has to match a past that is spread over city/state and federal networks.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: Think of the criminals that get found by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Cybernetic totalitarianism will solve ALL our problems!

    4. Re: Think of the criminals that get found by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      How is the US going to deal with the 5000+ and growing swarm of people heading its way via Mexico?

      Probably guns.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  12. On one hand... by Arzaboa · · Score: 2

    On one hand, this is great, because it will save time. On the other hand, it seems to be the inevitable march of being tracked and recorded everywhere one goes.

    On one hand, no one seems to care that they can already be pinpointed to a 100 foot spot on the planet. On the other hand, it makes it much easier to find the criminals.

    On one hand, if I'm not breaking the law, it shouldn't matter. On the other hand, the US has the largest prison population on the planet.

    On one hand, all this data is too much for any human to sort through. On the other hand, sic some AI bots on it and we can correlate, extrapolate and predict what people may or may not do.

    On one hand, most people have done something they shouldn't have done. On the other hand, every person can be identified, and taught a lesson by the state for any past, or future transgressions.

    On one hand, the technology to ID people will help things run smooth. On the other hand, we know that someone is creating an alert to notify the man, that we are back in town.

    --
    Don't forget to like me on Social Media! - Jimmy Fallon

    1. Re:On one hand... by Sebby · · Score: 2

      On one hand, the TSA are supposedly providing a safety service. In the other hand, they've got your balls.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    2. Re:On one hand... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Totalitarian states often have very low crime rates. The criminals all have jobs or have been exiled. The only crimes are committed by regime officials, who are obviously not subject to their own repressive laws.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re: On one hand... by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      No need for above-the-law style corruption if your laws are sufficiently wicked. All the great massacres and tyrannies of the 20th Century were fully lawful at the national level.

    4. Re:On one hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, they don't seem to be catching the criminals more easily at all - if they were, we should see a reverse in the ever-rising "fear of crime" index.

      So governments can't have it both ways - either take our freedoms "to stop crime" and actually do stop crime, or f right off taking our freedoms away.

    5. Re:On one hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many hands. The TSA invites you to apply for a job.

    6. Re:On one hand... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Weren't you already tracked when you handed over your passport to the TSA agent? What's the difference if the ID you with facial recognition? Either way, you're geolocated to that place and time. Don't they need to check people to see if they happen to be who they say they are, or would you prefer that they just let anyone board?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    7. Re:On one hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I provide my own set of latex gloves ... at least I know it's only been touching my balls!

  13. Waiting for the TSA bio chip implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can I finally get it implanted?

    1. Re:Waiting for the TSA bio chip implant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you sure it hasn't already been?

    2. Re:Waiting for the TSA bio chip implant by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      When is open to debate... I'm pretty sure that I can guess "where" you want it implanted, though...

  14. Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the TSA, vote for politicians that will abolish them. Otherwise STFU!

    1. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As if voting has made any difference in the past thirty years, at least...

    2. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by jonwil · · Score: 2

      Except that actually finding a politician you can vote for who wants to get rid of all this crap AND has a snowballs chance in hell of actually being elected is nearly impossible.

    3. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has made a BIG difference! It is keeping the two most corrupt political parties in power in America today, with over 98% of the vote! What could be more obvious?? All you people have to do is to vote for somebody else, that's it... If you won't make the feeblest of efforts, then you deserve what you are actually asking for with your vote. It couldn't be simpler. Please! Don't tell me it doesn't make a difference when you people don't even try!

      You know, all this 'helplessness' shtick all you put out and mod up is nothing but a bad reflection. I mean, you know, other than the fact that it works, it still sucks

    4. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is obviously the voters' problem, no? They decide who gets on the ballot. They decide who wins. The initiative to seek out the right person is theirs to take. If they don't, and simply take what's spoon fed by mass media, they have no one else to blame.

    5. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "If you don't like the TSA, vote for politicians that will abolish them. Otherwise STFU!"

      Thats the problem, there are no such politicians. Politicians ride around in private jets and are thus immune to the hassles of the TSA.

    6. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      That is obviously the voters' problem, no? They decide who gets on the ballot. They decide who wins. The initiative to seek out the right person is theirs to take. If they don't, and simply take what's spoon fed by mass media, they have no one else to blame.

      You obviously weren't paying attention during the last U.S. presidential election. The DNC did everything in it's power to ensure it's candidate got the nomination and ended up on the ballot, no matter what its voting party members wanted.

      You obvious are unaware of the kinds of barriers that the two main parties have put up. It's almost impossible for a third party candidate to make the ballot in every state. Even in local elections the bar is so high that just getting on the ballot if you aren't an R or a D is close to impossible.

      At this point short of armed rebellion I don't see what could every pry the levers of power out of the hands of the Democrats and Republicans.

    7. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what could every pry the levers of power out of the hands of the Democrats and Republicans.

      Oh please! Stop with the melodramatics! They merely have to vote them out. Right now they still get over 98%. This whole thing is entirely self inflicted. You people really have to stop making excuses.

    8. Re:Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Private jets are immune to the TSA?

      So all we need then, is for the airline to be organized a little differently. You don't buy a "ticket", you buy "a share" in a temporary airline that exists for the duration of the trip. So, the passengers really own the plane - it is a private jet. The jet is bought from a mother company (ordinary airline, or plane holding company), with money loaned from the same mother company. Personell & ground services are rented from the same place. When the plane lands, they default on the loan and give the plane back instead. The temporary airline is then bankrupt and dissolves. The passengers thus lost their fake investment, but they got moved to their destination for a normal price and is happy with that. For the hassle-free return trip, you buy a share in another temporary airline company . . .

    9. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      As if voting has made any difference in the past thirty years, at least...

      What? It worked just fine keeping HRC out of an office she had no business holding. Not that Donald belongs there.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    10. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      98% you say?

    11. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      I think he meant 98% of the people who bother to vote.

      Personally I wonder if Voting should be a mandatory part of citizenship as it is in some other countries.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    12. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I wonder if Voting should be a mandatory part of citizenship as it is in some other countries.

      If they count the 'none of the above' votes? Sure... but the problem is that a high turnout could jeopardize our single party duopoly. They really don't want that...

    13. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      46.1 for one, 48.2 for the other, 94.3%. Other candidates got 6.7. I stand corrected. I feel so very sorry. But... there you are, if enough of you just give the other candidate your vote that candidate will win... Math is simple

    14. Re: Quit yer bellyachin'!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck! 5.7 !

      Who's the idiot that said math was simple?! Me? Oops, so sue me!

  15. Full sensory DRM filtering, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All input and output, scanned, dug through, and modified to engineer you reality. As soon as it's technically possible. "Finally" closing the last analog loophole too.

    Oh, and controlling your body, in case you don't obey.

    You're a cell now. There is only one life form: Murica.

  16. That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg trials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And "I only followed orders." also doesn't work now. I'm German, by the way. Our history classes in school are 90% "Look at this horrible shit we did. Never do that shit again, cause and this is why.”

    "I gotta pay the bills" isn't an excuse to break in and steal somebody's money either. Let alone do full-on totalitarian state terrorism. Doesn't matter if somebody told you to do it, now does it?

    Let's be very clear: I don't expect you to risk your life by openly fighting the oppressors. But: If you work for the Gestapo, err, TSA, argue for the TSA, support the TSA, or otherwise enable the TSA, you're a traitor.

    Frankly, the most scary part, to me, is that the USA does not have anyone strong that could bring it to its knees, like Germany had Russia, the UK, the French Resistance and the USA, once it goes full goose stepping. Who's gonna help us? Overweight US citizens with silly hand guns? Aliens? The Russians and China? Don't make me laug^Wcry.

  17. Internal passport, please, Comrade by davecb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most countries do not have exit controls. Those that do aren't a good place to love.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
    1. Re:Internal passport, please, Comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Passport? Where can an American go outside their borders without one? And coming back in? I don't even know how that works...

    2. Re:Internal passport, please, Comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the #1 thing I hate about Australia.

      The whole place is a fucking prison.

  18. Re:That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is sadly why they can get away with this. With many other countries, there was always a "Boogie man" around the corner that was a bigger concern.. In this case, there really isn't. All the "manufactured" ones are there to goad and drive the masses to the selective pens of their choosing.

  19. 1984 the instruction manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill it, kill it!

  20. Re:On one hand...Except it Won't by I75BJC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "On one hand, this is great, because it will save time." Facial Recognition Scanning tests have Added Time to inspection lines thus Far. This has been in the news (and maybe /., too). The TSA is complaining to the Airlines that they, the Airlines, want on-time departures and will stop facial scanning in order to achieve on-time departures. Whereas, the TSA wants the Airlines to delay all flights until every passenger is face-scanned. It is a clusterfuck on a Grand Scale. Hasn't everything the TSA attempted to do (to protect) failed miserably? What evidence that the TSA will get face-scanning correct?

  21. high street prices by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a niqab shop next to the chik-fil-a at the airport might be profitable.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  22. You can make it better by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I won't be sexually molested by a government goon.

    If you get Global Entry, it means you get TSA-Precheck on domestic (U.S.) flights, and much quicker passing through customs going back into the U.S.

    You also get to use the metal scanner only instead of the full body scanner, set to a weak enough level you can leave on watches and belts and shoes (some women's shoes seem to still pack enough metal to set them off).

    Doing that you have a very low probability of being frisked (the only time I was it was because they were only running the full body scanners which I do not go through).

    I too, like others, drive when I can - usually up to 10-20 hours away I will drive, but sometimes flying is just more expedient, and you are cutting yourself off from too much of the world to suit me by not flying sometimes.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:You can make it better by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I have Global Entry (GE), and am a 60 yr old white male. Coming back from a recent vacation to Iceland and Norway, I was "identified" by TSA for additional screening in Reykjavick, taken into a back room, patted down, etc. Note that Iceland Air doesn't participate in TSA Pre, and when identified, I handed them my Global Entry card, and that was also of no help. Don't get me wrong, I love skipping the line when getting back here...GE has saved me hours of wait time. You do also get TSA-Pre on international flights, but only with participating airlines, and you'll likely need to notify that airline that you have GE...they won't know unless you tell them. I just put it on all of my frequent flyer profiles.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  23. I wouldn't mind this IF... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I would be OK with them using facial scanning tech (it's inevitable anyway so I'd rather know when they are using it then have them pretend they are not).

    However, what I would also like to see is openness in the process as to how effective it really is. How many false positives, how many false negatives, per airport. All too many security features are introduced which I have no confidence have any use but scaring off potential criminals, I would love to know if this tool in the end would really help or just be another really expensive waste of time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: I wouldn't mind this IF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It already is out of control. Like Caesars Entertainment security using face recognition at Defcon 25 to time their armed âoewellness checksâ so they can plow through your belongings and steal shit while youâ(TM)re out of the room. And probably plant drugs and stuff too.

  24. Molestation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest every third person going through a TSA checkpoint pop a boner just to make the goons day more interesting.

  25. Why is ID important? by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    Why the heck does it matter who is on the plane as long as they are not carrying something dangerous?

    I travel by air a lot so I am in the TSA PreCheck program. It saves me a lot of time and for that time saving (simpler screening process), I am willing have the background check etc. In this case a facial recognition may help prove that I am really a person that has been vetted and therefore are eligible for a less intensive screening. However for people that aren't in PreCheck, why would it matter if we know who they are? As long as they pass the normal screening process, it should be safe enough to let them on the plane.

    If facial recognition (or any other sort of rigorous ID check is done) for purposes other than validating pre-vetted individuals, it feels like more like tracking citizen movement than increasing flight security.

    1. Re:Why is ID important? by mhotchin · · Score: 1

      The airline fought to *have* this ID requirement. It prevents ticket re-selling, all booking changes go through the airline and they can charge you for it.

    2. Re:Why is ID important? by terrycarlino · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a bigger picture here. The U.S. anti-terrorist groups aren't just interested in preventing a terrorist taking down the plane they're flying on. They want to catch them on the way into the country, and while they're traveling the country, on their way to non-aircraft internal terror attacks. The major nightmare for federal anti-terrorist forces is a terror attack at someplace like Mall of the Americas or Disney World.

      Such an attack has never happened, but the big fear is an attack in such a venue will cause people to stop frequenting such places, which would result in major losses for the corporations that own them.

      It's why the TSA security theater exists in the first place. The airlines were terrified that people would stop flying, so the government set up TSA, not to make it safer to fly, because statistically terror attacks are an insignificant danger to any specific passenger, but to make people think it was safer to fly, so they would keep flying.

      Like most things the government does they've ham handed it up and are now actually driving people away from flying. Luckily for the airlines they have more than enough business because some people have to fly or just cancel their trip entirely. Also now there is a whole generation who has never experienced reasonable airline security practices, so don't actually realize how bad it is.

      When the terror groups eventually fizzle out, like the anarchists of the late 19th/early 20th century did, the U.S. government won't know how to respond to it. Of course they will fizzle out. Terrorism in the middle east is pay-rolled by petrodollars. When that finally runs out Islamic terrorism will go the way of the Paris Commune.

    3. Re: Why is ID important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. Congratulations. You've stumbled upon the worst kept secret in airline travel.

      Does ANYONE think they do these things for YOUR safety?

      It's 2018. the TSA has proven themselves ineffective since they began their 'service' yet people still think they're working to keep citizens safe.

      Tell people something enough and they'll believe it?

      Curious.

    4. Re:Why is ID important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to have facial recognition to stop the cheek bombers. They stuff explosives in their cheeks (a bit like a hamster with food). Facial recognition is literally the only way to see if anyone's doing this - so it's the only way to stop it.

      Just think - pretty soon the US will have almost no criminals left - they'll all have been scooped up by initiatives such as this. Vote Trump!

    5. Re:Why is ID important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good part about terrorism, is its NEVER going to fizzle out, because its a boogie man they can milk forever because literally ANYTHING can be (or not, depending on how you want to count) considered terrorism. (they don't consider 99% of the domestic terrorism acts terrorism (take a look at those that are committing the acts and that should tell you why), but the few things that are, they turn into a mountain, when the reality, its not even a speed bump, because they can milk it for "reasons why we need". Remember, the military mindset is EVERYONE is threat, just some have not been caught YET. Forgetting that true security is about assessing threats, encouraging trust with those you can, and being judicious with the tools/resources you do have so you are not bogged down in controlling EVERYTHING and focus on real risks.

      But as I said, that's what REAL security is about. Security theater just has to look like its effective using circular logic.

    6. Re:Why is ID important? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      However for people that aren't in PreCheck, why would it matter if we know who they are? As long as they pass the normal screening process, it should be safe enough to let them on the plane.

      Intimidation helps maintain order in a police state. Every level of law enforcement uses it routinely.

  26. I'll be glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be so glad when we catch all the terrorists & we can finally all get our rights back.

    1. Re: I'll be glad by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Pssssssst - there never were any real terrorists. Shhhhhhhh, don't tell anyone!

    2. Re: I'll be glad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where will you store all of the muslims then?

  27. Oh boy, twice minimum wage? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    why, that's $16/hr.

    Also, you're straw manning. The point is that it's not the guy that hassles you for the pocket knife on your key chain who's oppressing you, it's the billionaire who destabilized the middle east for profit and hegemony and thereby created a climate where terrorists thrive. Stop wasting your time and energy on folks who are barely even small potatoes just because they're the ones you see. Look past that to the root cause.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Oh boy, twice minimum wage? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Straw man? What about your false dilemma? The guy hassling me over a pocket knife is actively participating in an oppressive system (if it's truly oppression to have to submit to airport security procedures, that is). Without an army of "small potatoes" to enforce the rules, the billionaire has no power.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  28. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the TSA give facials already.

    1. Re:Nothing new by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      I thought the TSA give facials already.

      It's the anals that everybody is nervous about.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re: Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. They get facials if they don't move quickly enough. Small difference there.

  29. America is becoming more and more like China ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With facial recognition detectors springing up everywhere our privacy is no longer protected.

    America supposed to be a land where FREEDOM IS CHERISHED, but apparently, we are moving closer and closer towards AUTHORITARIANISM, like the one in China !

  30. Justified or not by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's useless. Don't attack the body, attack the head.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Justified or not by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      it's useless. Don't attack the body, attack the head.

      No... That's not how it works in real life. You don't always have access to the head.

      Apart from a few attempts, we couldn't attack Hitler (the head) directly.. We had to fight the entire German army (the body). Then we had Nuremberg to codify the idea that the body is just as guilty as the head when things get to a certain point.

      It is disheartening to me that we continue to tolerate things that are blatantly unconstitutional and then nobody is punished when SCOTUS finally strikes down a law. I'm not talking about shit that's close.. or barely illegal... I'm talking shit where SCOTUS rules 9-0 or 8-1 against a law and then all the assholes who were enforcing it, and knew damn well that the law was unconstitutional, are not rounded up and fined or imprisoned.

  31. Skynet and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need a scan of your face so they can transmit the data to Skynet when it sends out killer drones.

  32. The terrorists won by astrofurter · · Score: 2

    President Geedub Boosh said, "they hate us because of our freedom". Well, we sure fixed that!

  33. Re: That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are delusional and insensitive. Ironically you are the one pushing the propaganda. Even Nazis are man enough to say what they did. You are just an asshole.

  34. What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... reduce the need for physical documents like passports ...

    What happens when the connection to the national passport database stops and their paperless system doesn't work?

    Until every other country shares their passport database with the USA (and provides an infallible connection), customs will have to depend on a local copy of that data: That is, a passport.

    ... and paper tickets.

    How will airline employees know you're at the correct gate? Or, will employees be required to access the national passport data too.

    1. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local copy will be stored in the soon to be mandatory and universal subcutaneous ID/passport chip developed by the Alphabet group that will be updated from satellites which will also track & record your movements and who you're associating with 24/7/365. Beat that, China! USA! USA! USA!

  35. Re:That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has its own people, and it has a batch of people who work with tech that could turn all of north america into a scorched ruin if they let the wrong tech run wild. Which has been the ultimate worry for a while. You've got a large body of veterans with experience in war, some of them very nasty wars, and you've got tech geeks, gun geeks, chem geeks, physics geeks, all who have hobbies that can be weaponized pretty damned fast. Get all of them together with a strong motivation to bring down a corrupt regime, and you'll bring down the whole house of cards like you would no believe. As in Nuclear Winter bad.

  36. Well, there are terrorists alright... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Created largely by USA meddlesome foreign policy that constantly sticks its nose where it doesn't belong. That, and abandoning our former covert assets, such as 'Tim' Osama bin Laden, former CIA-backed fighter against the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

  37. Hilariously great plan guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha who in their right mind would allow this?
    Why not just finance the shackles with a nationwide GoFundMe and get it over with

  38. Re: That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tr by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel for your country. With over 20% of the next generation not being german you may soon be bred out of your own country. Do Thank Merkel for that.

    It's happening here too. They say "Australia gives people a go". That's correct. Australians do. Soon there won't be many of us left. 5% indian and growing. Getting to 5% muslim (some crossover with Indian there) etc. Come back in 3 generations and you may be hard pressed to find an aussie.

    I'm sure there's a whole bunch of aboriginals just waiting for you to cry on their shoulders.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  39. Re: That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tr by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm sure there's a whole bunch of aboriginals just waiting for you to cry on their shoulders.

    Aboriginals who, after the Muslims get through treating them as they do Yazidis and Chaldeans, will be wanting the Aussies back again.

  40. 'Homeland' Security... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TSA is just a corner of a much bigger apparatus, one which is threating to engulf every aspect of life, liberty, and excise/criminalize any attempt to pursue happiness.

    I just hope I manage to get out while I still can.

  41. Re:On one hand...Except it Won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it will because a trained person (hahahahha) can make determinations on the accuracy of the photo and which to take longer or shorter on. Also THE PICTURE MATCHING THE TICKET IS NOT THE FREAK'IN PROBLEM. Is the harassment POST Photo-match that's the issue.. so its not going to improve the speed at all, is going to slow things down because a computer will treat them all equally (theoretically, but the reality is, if you are darker than swiss coffee or have a name with more than 5 consonants its going to pull you over for "random" verification).

    And besides, this is just another information grab.. Since the majority of people that "they" worry about actually move about, it's an easy way to get their ID into a database that then they can use to track/monitor them without stating that. They don't care about the people that never leave their birth/hometowns.. (they have other ways to monitor them)

  42. Simple Answer: Drive by BrendaEM · · Score: 2

    You also vote with your Dollars. Vote against it.
    The truth is, most sighted people could check the ID. Obviously, they are going to use this to scan everyone. Just don't go, but call your local airline and tell them exactly why. Then it will change.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Simple Answer: Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple Answer: Drive

      Yes, please drive instead. It makes the lines a lot shorter so I can get to my flight faster.

  43. They already have all the data through Precheck by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    For those who raise privacy concerns around this, TSA already has all the data through the Global Entry / Precheck application process. When you use Global Entry / Precheck, they already get your photograph from your passport (which is linked to a wealth of other information including birthplace, social security number, international travel, etc.), your fingerprints and current address and contact information from when you applied, and all of your domestic flight information through the myriad of national airport security and customs databases. This is less about harvesting new data and more leveraging existing new data to streamline the process for everyone.

    Now if they expand this to ALL domestic air travelers, it's probably breaking new ground, but even then, they still in theory have access to everyone's photos through the Read ID system.

  44. Sick Sick Sicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to fly? Put your forehead or your hand here.

  45. Re: That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh they are screwed. There's now only 1 million or so left. Well probably less because the government pays better to those who claim to be abo.

    Yeah it doesn't matter who takes over when the aussies die out. They will take out our ignore the abbos and run the place down.

    Odds are it will be the Chinese sending people here by the million.
    The muzzies tried and failed.
    The Indians are giving it a go now and doing really well. So much so that their countrymen complain about how many are here.
    Some of our neighbours would just love to rush in.

    When our army can't defend us we are gone.
    I hope we will be remembered.

  46. Mission Impossible by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Anyone who's watched any Mission Impossible movie or episode knows that facial recognition is easy to fool.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  47. Re:On one hand...Except it Won't by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Hasn't everything the TSA attempted to do (to protect) failed miserably?

    That's not what the TSA is for. The TSA is there to frighten Americans and employ deplorables. (Nobody else would be willing to molest air passengers for money.) It's succeeding brilliantly at both of those things. Actually preventing terror attacks is counterproductive if your primary goal is to control the sheeple so you can shear them occasionally.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. I take the patdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I prefer some strange black man touching my genitals for free, can i skip the radiation machine and facial tech still?

  49. And That's By Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are now a slave to the US Government, beholden to your locality by the TSA. It's the most unconstitutional shit ever.

  50. How about this? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    I know it's a pipe dream since this is a government operation but here goes.

    TSA is required to give a detailed plan on what this change is supposed to provide, giving hard numbers and not just vague assurances. They have to state how many years they have to achieve said goal

    One year before the mandatory end of the program the GAO goes in and does the work to find out if the program actually did as it was intended or not.

    If not, since it probably won't, then the program is immediately terminated and any similar plan is limited to 1/4 the amount of time as the original, with more stringent defined goals.

    If it does work then they can submit a new proposal with a term no longer than the original with the same qualifications - GAO review one year before expiration.

    I'm not against the TSA trying to make the experience faster and more efficient. I'm against them having no accountability for their decisions.

  51. Real Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a B.S. excuse to get your biometric face data into their systems, so they can use it for surveillance. They will use it not because it's necessary, but because they can, and you can't do shit about it.

  52. Opt out. Always. I've never used scanners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Opt out. Always. I've never used the mm-wave scanners. Not once.
    Usually when I opt out, 5 people behind me do as well.
    Returning to the USA, I opt out as well.

    In AMS, they ended up turning off all the scanning for the flight because I refused. A very tall woman wasn't very happy with me.

    But sometimes you end up being assaulted and groped. That happened leaving Prague. Groped twice, once in public, then taken behind a screen and groped again. When he finished, I asked if he thought my testicles had cancer.

    In the UK, the guy waved his hands over me, don't think he touched me, then said I was clear.

    But none of this pisses me off as much as stealing my huge bottle of water purchased inside security, at the gate, just before entering the plane. Happened in Chile and China. Flying between countries that aren't the USA is mostly nice, like it was in 2000. Watched the takeoff through the cockpit on a flight from Singapore to Bangkok. They didn't bother closing the door and the floor-door into the avionics bay wasn't locked either.

    Just don't fly near Russia. Might get shot down.

  53. Re:On one hand...Except it Won't by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    What? I fly a fair bit... the facial compare to your passport/ID part is never the hold up. It is the bag scanning that holds up the lines. Are we talking about the same thing? TSA lines right? ...not after you exit the plane in another country and go through customs, which is slow, granted.

  54. Re: s/using a human/using a computer/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else can you do facial recognition without a computer? Please do tell us old wise one.

    Fucking imbecile.

  55. They don't even enforce their own rules by Only+Time+Will+Tell · · Score: 1

    I had a lovely run in with TSA this morning as I was flying out for a business trip. I was trying to pull my laptop out to put in a separate bin and a rude TSA agent came over and told me to stop and put it back. I tried to send the laptop bag through on its own only to more scolding (apparently it was fine to put the backpack and all my items in one bin). They seem to change what they want everytime you go to the airport just so you look like a crazy person trying to comply. Ask any breastfeeding mother about how arbitrary the agents can be about breast milk.

  56. Re: That excuse didn't work a the Nürnberg tr by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    When our army can't defend us we are gone.
    I hope we will be remembered.

    Crocodile Dundee will never be forgotten.