Slashdot Mirror


Suspicious Packages Spotlight Vast 'Mail Cover' Postal Surveillance System (fastcompany.com)

tedlistens writes: As law enforcement investigates possible mail bombs sent to prominent Democratic Party figures and liberal activists, the tools available at their disposal include digital images and delivery metadata commonly associated with mail sent in the United States. The U.S. Postal Service regularly photographs the front and back of every piece of U.S. mail, or about 150 billion parcels, envelopes, and postcards every year. A longstanding practice known as the "mail cover" program enables law enforcement to obtain address information and images of the outsides of mail as part of an investigation without the need for a warrant through the Postal Inspection Service, the U.S. Postal Service's policing arm.

According to a report from CBS News, authorities are currently using "data analytics" to spot similar packages to those identified as containing bombs. Images of packages shared with the press show a common return address, using the misspelled name of Representative and former Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. The Postal Inspection Service doesn't generally comment on its investigative techniques. As part of the mail cover program, mail is routinely digitally photographed as part of the sorting process and even available for recipients to digitally preview in some areas. Apart from threats like bombs, the department says its main focus is on mail theft, fraud, and narcotics cases.

90 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. It's just metadata! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What, you thought metadata collection only applied to digital communication?

    1. Re:It's just metadata! by Bradmont · · Score: 2

      Is it just metadata if they photograph a postcard?

    2. Re:It's just metadata! by pz · · Score: 2

      The exterior of all mail is considered to be public information, including post-cards. There is no expectation of privacy.

      Want to write a post-card without making the contents public? Put it in an envelope, simple as that.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  2. USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily mail by turp182 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's called Informed Delivery. They email you images of what's arriving that day.

    https://informeddelivery.usps....

    My wife signed up for it, it's sort of creepy and exciting (at first).

    I would assume they image everything (at least letter sized) as part of sorting.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  3. Not news, just another service by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The postal service offers "Informed Delivery" where you can see your mail before you pick it up. From their web site: "Digitally preview your mail and manage your packages scheduled to arrive soon! Informed Delivery allows you to view greyscale images of the exterior, address side of letter-sized mailpieces and track packages in one convenient location."

    1. Re:Not news, just another service by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      The postal service offers "Informed Delivery" where you can see your mail before you pick it up. From their web site: "Digitally preview your mail and manage your packages scheduled to arrive soon! Informed Delivery allows you to view greyscale images of the exterior, address side of letter-sized mailpieces and track packages in one convenient location."

      The nice extension to this would be if you could mark stuff as junk, and the post office would then dump it rather than delivering it to your house.

  4. USPS Informed Delivery - Kinda handy, actually by Kevoco · · Score: 5, Informative

    Go to informeddelivery.usps.com
    Select "Sign Up For Free."

    1. Re:USPS Informed Delivery - Kinda handy, actually by ksw_92 · · Score: 2

      OK, I thought I've never, ever see this happen but it looks like that site's slashdotted now. It's about as unlikely an occurrence as Sears.com melting down on Black Friday.

    2. Re: USPS Informed Delivery - Kinda handy, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can believe that the graybeards on slashdot can bring down a website devoted to that favorite of old people, snail mail, definitely!

    3. Re:USPS Informed Delivery - Kinda handy, actually by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      It surprises me that anyone is surprised by this. The USPS does more tracking of everything imaginable than Google, it's nearly impossible to send something of any real size anonymously. Which also surprises me that the guy sending the bombs wasn't aware of this.

      Mind you someone doing what he did clearly wasn't in any rational state of mind, so I guess not knowing you'd get caught almost immediately comes with that.

    4. Re:USPS Informed Delivery - Kinda handy, actually by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      The couldn't spell (not just the names, but "Florid" too) and you expect him to know this?

  5. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    My address is not available for this service...what are they hiding?

  6. Re:I was wondering when /. would find an excuse .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Also none of these packages shown have ever been in the postal system, or any other tracking system. They would have to have been placed in various mailrooms by hand.

  7. MAGA Bomber!!! by bit+trollent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Surprising nobody, the person sending bombs to Democratic politicians, supporters, and media organizations is a virulently pro-Trump terrorist.

    His van is covered in pro-Trump stickers, along with stickers of Democrats with gun targets on their faces.

    The coverings of the terrorist's van refer to Trump's stated enemy list as well as memes shared by right wing republicans nationwide.

    Is it too much to ask that Trump stop encouraging his supporters to violently attack reporters and Democrats?

    1. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Surprising nobody, the person sending bombs to Democratic politicians, supporters, and media organizations is a virulently pro-Trump terrorist.

      His van is covered in pro-Trump stickers, along with stickers of Democrats with gun targets on their faces.

      The coverings of the terrorist's van refer to Trump's stated enemy list as well as memes shared by right wing republicans nationwide.

      Is it too much to ask that Trump stop encouraging his supporters to violently attack reporters and Democrats?

      Real bullets that actually work were shot at Republican lawmakers having a ball game. One was seriously wounded.

      Was that Democrats' fault? Or was it just a lone nut?

    2. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Democrats don't share pictures of republicans with gun targets on their face.

      Republicans share pictures of democrats (including this weeks' bombing targets) with gun targets painted on their face.

      So yes, when a lunatic does something that goes contrary to everything Dems stand for it's not Democrats fault. When a republican puts violent right wing memes spread by Trump and prominent republicans into action they deserve the blame.

    3. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh no! My side had bombs sent to them.
      Well, MY side was shot at! That's a hundred times worse.

      My side, your side. Republicans. Democrats. Don't you think that's how we ended up where we are right now?

      Repeat after me: "It is a tragedy when ANYONE is threatened or attacked and we, as American Citizens, should be appalled and angered every single time any violence happens to anyone. Everyone should feel safe TO SPEAK their beliefs and TO HEAR OTHERS speak their beliefs. No exceptions."

    4. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Democrats didn't encourage the potential bombings to happen while Trump is continuously encourages violent behavior. Remember Palin and the crosshair bullshit which led to Gifford getting shot in the head? The Republicans have a long history of inciting violence. However don't worry, cascadingstylesheet, none of this will cost the Republicans any seats in the upcoming elections, but the Dems are a bunch of unimaginative pansies who are crappy at the art of theatrics to rile up their base like the way the Republicans can.

    5. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When was the last time a Democrat running for any office - let alone the Presidency - stood in the middle of a crowded stadium and offered up bail money for anyone arrested being violent in their name, you intellectually dishonest shithead?

    6. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have seen democrats share pictures with targets on the faces of their political opponents. Hell, one of the "bomb" targets was telling her supporters to harass any members of the Cabinet they see out in public. Another one was recorded telling supporters "when they go low, we kick them".

      What exactly is "everything Dems stand for"? It seems these days they're more than happy to encourage folks to "see a nazi, punch a nazi".... and then label all their opponents as nazis.

    7. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1, Funny

      Real bullets that actually work were shot at Republican lawmakers having a ball game. One was seriously wounded.

      Was that Democrats' fault? Or was it just a lone nut?

      To me, as an independent, this says- followers of both main parties are deranged idiots- but the Democrats are better at pulling off their objectives.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Crazy person attacks Republican Congresspeople: blame the crazy.
      Crazy person sends bombs to Democrats: blame the Republicans.

      Nancy Pelosi: “How DARE anyone blame us for the actions of one mentally sick individual.”

    9. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Palin and the crosshair bullshit" led to Gifford being shot in the head by someone who started planning *years* before the crosshair bullshit? Amazing!

      https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    10. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correct - Democrats create "art" with a decapitated Trump head instead. "Art" makes it cool.

      Democrats also go out and violently protest, fighting police, damaging public property, and bloodying people who wear MAGA hats. But that's just because they're so passionate about freedom and democracy and stuff.

      Clearly there's a single "good" team in all of this.

    11. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was a lone nut. We know this because he was not incited. Nobody encouraged him to be violent.

      This guy was incited. Trump has specifically talked of killing people, particularly opponents. The conspiracy theories he referenced were ones promoted by Trump-backed media outlets.

      You are entitled to question which incitement made the difference, who is ultimately responsible for driving him over the edge. What you aren't entitled to do is invent your own set of facts.

      If you do not see any difference between the cases, I can't help you.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    12. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is making a graphic with a target on someone not already threatening? As other posters have said, one side is worse about this than the other. Your nice statement is double-speak. No, you should not feel safe to speak a belief that someone else should be attacked with extrajudicial violence.

    13. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh no, inanimate objects! That's much worse than you people feeling the need for speed towards a crowd of protesters and ganging up half-a-dozen strong on a black kid curled up on the ground. Oh, and mailing out a dozen bombs, lets not forget that. And then there was the time one of your guys blew himself up in Texas making more bombs, but on the bright side at least he killed the bad guy.

    14. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Terrorising? Sorry, no. That is not enough. This was a terrorist attack. A term he is keen on using when his supporters are at risk.

      He is the President of the whole country or none of it. It is not enough until he calls it for what it is.

      I don't expect him to admit to lying when he said earlier that it was a false flag, when he would have already been informed it wasn't. I don't think he has the guts. He can't do anything about that.

      Letting him slide on diminishing and belittling terms. No.

      And I expect any American to insist he calls it for what it is, whatever side they are on. One America, indivisible, cannot allow the belittling of an attrocity.

      The same is true of all attacks on all sides. I am fully aware of the attack some time ago on a Republican and his friends. That, too, was a terrorist attack. Not terrorizing, not less than. Said so then, will repeat so now.

      Those Republicans who have said it was a terrorist attack, good for you. You've courage and decency.

      All I ask is for false flag theorists and "terrorizing" justifiers to do the decent thing. Call it for what it is.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    15. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by jd · · Score: 1

      Don't know any Democrat who has said any of that. Can you name names and offer compelling evidence?

      An impartial study showing immigration by Hispanics increases under Democrat governance would suffice.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    16. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The thread is about:

      > Democrats don't share pictures of republicans with gun targets on their face

      You can't keep track of the simplest concepts in front of your face, which makes other libtards look bad. Maybe the internet isn't for you.

    17. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First of all, fuck your ableism.

      Second, the person who attacked Republicans did so IN SPITE of the Democrats' non-violent ideals, whereas the person who sent these bombs did so BECAUSE of Trump's constant inciting and condoning of violence.

      It's always the same, Democrats tell you that maybe you shouldn't be so racist, you respond with violence. It's just like Hillary said, there's no room for civility anymore, we aren't dealing with rational people, we are dealing with deranged animals who want to destroy society because they're angry that suddenly they have to share their toys with women and people of color.

    18. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck should I have to listen to nazis and white supremacists?

      My friend, I think you are confused. I know it is a common misconception, but "everyone should feel safe [...] to hear others speak" is not the same as saying "everyone should be forced to hear others speak".

      If you do not wish to listen to nazis, that is fine, you do not have to. But I for one do want to. Not because I believe in their statements, but because I want to know who the asshats are.

    19. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by werepants · · Score: 1

      Now, she didn't *explicitly* say that Republicans should be hunted down and killed like al-Qaida and the Taliban... But what other implication are you supposed to draw? That they should be thrown in the prison at Guantánamo?

      Hillary was using a rhetorical technique of equivalence there to make her opponents seem like backward fundamentalists. Republicans are actively and explicitly advocating for Democrats to be sent to guantanamo - just google it on Infowars. It's completely bonkers.

    20. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Democrat here with a FOID card. Because not all Republicans are the insane parody Democrats try to make them out to be. I have many Republican friends who support the right to bear arms but who do not and will not ever own guns. And I have Democrat friends who want stricter gun ownership or flat out banning of the sale of guns any and everywhere in the US, but who also carry around tazers and friggin ice picks (of all things, and no, I don't understand why them and not pepper spray for example).

      The world is a complex place. A person generally figures that out very quickly once they've removed their heads from their backsides and had a look around in the world outside political one-upsmanship. ffs

    21. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      "Is it too much to ask that Trump stop encouraging his supporters to violently attack reporters and Democrats?"

      Is calling it a despicable act and condemning it enough? Because that's what Trump did.

      Was that before or after he riled up chants to lock up Soros?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    22. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now, she didn't *explicitly* say that Republicans should be hunted down and killed like al-Qaida and the Taliban... But what other implication are you supposed to draw? That they should be thrown in the prison at Guantánamo?

      It's very obvious she was asking voters not to vote for these Republicans, that's what campaign rallies are supposed to be about, after all. Anything more bloodthirsty is purely in your own mind.

    23. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      What exactly is "everything Dems stand for"?

      I'll field this one. I'm independent but have only voted for Democratic candidates simply because no one happened to be better.

      The first priority is to institute a check against the lunacy coming out of the White House. This is absolutely essential because Donald Trump doesn't think, he just spouts whatever happens to pop into his deranged brain at the moment, and because he's president, it suddenly becomes policy. Cruel, real life things, like separating children from their families and restricting rights for women and minorities. Perhaps we can curb his use of stochastic terrorism that leads to incidents like the one we are discussing.

      Once that is accomplished, maybe we can focus more on policies that help people instead of actively hurting them. Healthcare for all would be a good start. Certainly that would benefit more people than some inane wall.

    24. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Surprising nobody, the person sending bombs to Democratic politicians, supporters, and media organizations is a virulently pro-Trump terrorist.

      Apparently it came as a surprise to those who promoted it as a false flag operation or asserted that republicans just don't do this kind of thing

      --
      Nullius in verba
    25. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Meahwhile in reality,
      >breitbart.com

      AMAZING.

    26. Re:MAGA Bomber!!! by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      A Democrat held up a fake severed head of Trump. That's a step beyond putting a bullseye on a photo.

      And antifa is a non-violent service organization that collects money for orphans, right?

    27. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Then every instance of Republicans being harassed in public is the fault of Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, and CNN.

      And every instance where a Nazi harasses a Democrat by running them over with their car is Trump's fault.

      But yeah sure, same thing.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    28. Re: MAGA Bomber!!! by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      To call Trump's rhetoric, however over-the-top it usually is, as specifically inciting people to murder others, is as absolutely batshit crazy as the people who believed in pizzagate.

  8. scanning does not mean tracking by kiviQr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amazing, they are the only one who cannot find or track my packages but at least the photograph both sides of every letter.

    1. Re:scanning does not mean tracking by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      So, two stories about tracking packages at the USPS:

      1) Earlier this year my wife and I ordered a piece of furniture on eBay (a flat-pack, DIY assembly sort of thing for some cheap storage we needed). The furniture didn't arrive on time, and the seller was unresponsive, so we initiated a dispute ten days after the original delivery date. The day that eBay was set to close the dispute in our favor by default, the seller suddenly posts a tracking number that proves the item was delivered to our ZIP code two days before the guaranteed delivery date.

      So, off to the USPS office we went to sort things out, figuring that someone had misrouted or stolen our package. The guy there was able to pull up the tracking number and quickly discovered that, rather than being delivered to our address, our package had been delivered to a local Cracker Barrel restaurant instead. "Cracker Barrel has our furniture?!", my wife asked incredulously. "Furniture? No. It's a padded envelope from Amazon", came the reply. He flipped his screen around to show us the picture of the package, taken by the postman as it was being delivered to Cracker Barrel. The man in the office was kind enough to print out a copy of that image, which clearly showed a medium-sized padded envelope bearing the tracking number given to eBay by the seller.

      With that printout in hand (as well as the fact that the online tracking information listed the item as being a lightweight package), we were able to successfully appeal the decision and receive a full refund. Oh, but first we had to file a criminal complaint to the FBI, submit proof we had done so to eBay, and then receive notice from eBay that they were only extending the courtesy of a refund to us this one time, but that we'd be on the hook for the payment if anything like this (i.e. someone takes our money without sending us anything) should happen again.

      To say the least, my wife hasn't used eBay ever since (and I've only used it via a credit card so that I can initiate a chargeback if need be), but, man, did the USPS come through for us that time.

      =====

      2) A music store where my wife worked once rented an instrument to a customer who absconded with the instrument without ever making a payment. After multiple attempts at contacting the person failed, the store tried to file criminal charges so that they could make an insurance claim. The police told them that they needed to prove they had attempted to contact the customer first, which meant sending a letter via certified mail, as you do in these situations.

      Fast forward a month and my wife was on the phone with USPS because the letter's tracking information showed that after going to the correct city on day one, it then took a detour on day three to a city a few hundred miles away, which is where it had been for the remainder of the last month. Once she was able to get on the phone to talk to the support representative, the rep agreed that the letter was simply lost, told her that the store would need to send another letter, and suggested that maybe the store should send it via certified mail this time...words that the rep promptly ate once they realized it had been sent via certified mail.

      For an extra dose of irony, my wife spent 15 minutes on hold before she was able to talk to the support representative. As she waited on hold, she was told repeatedly by a pre-recorded loop that if she had any concerns about her letters or packages arriving, she should use certified mail. It's apparently guaranteed to arrive.

  9. The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Trump by bit+trollent · · Score: 2

    The arrested bomber's van is covered in pro-Trump stickers, and violent memes spread by republicans nationwide, like a gun target painted on a picture of Hillary Clinton.

    You may apologize now.

    Trump should apologize for encouraging domestic terrorism.

  10. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And also, they are in plain manilla envelopes, not shipping envelopes.

    Go get a regular yellow envelope, put a "thing" in it, like an old ethernet card or whatever. Try to handle the envelope without it ripping.

    Anyways

    COOL CLOCK CESAR!!!!!

  11. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by turp182 · · Score: 2

    Interesting, I thought it was generally available for letter mail.

    And what are they hiding? They probably don't want to tip you off of their awareness of your untoward and tawdry mail contents...

    Maybe it's only in urban areas, but they have to scan everything anyway for sorting purposes.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  12. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1, Informative

    All of the photos of the packages show absolutely no post marks, barcodes, cancelled postage.. Nothing.

    So they say they were delivered by courier.. But couriers wont take packages with postage on them, and again.. .No shipping labels, no barcode.

    So they say they were hand delivered. This guy drove up and down the coast and delivered all the packages within a few hours of each other?

    How the fuck is this supposed to work.

    Should I believe this goofball had a whole team working with him?

    They said one package couldnt be delivered, so it was sent back to the return address.. And yet, NO FUCKING POSTMARKS ON THE PACKAGE.

    None of the packages shown have ever been in the USPS system, nor Fedex, UPS, etc, etc..

    What the fuck?

    A little common sense reveals your hoax claim to be ridiculous.

    If what you say is true, the USPS and FBI have to be in on this plot. Do you think two organizations of that size could keep this quiet if it was a hoax. Not everyone at USPS or FBI is vehemently anti-republican so this would leak. Use common sense before you post nonsense.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  13. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LOL - And the democrats who are actually encouraging civil unrest and violence even after a republican was shot at a baseball game? I don't recall any apologies there.

    And honestly, earlier this month "Suspected Ricin sent to Pentagon, suspicious letters to Trump, Ted Cruz office"
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/u...

    How did the media respond to this? Well the New York times publishes a fictional article about the secret service and Russians assassinating Trump

  14. Call for violence then act surprised when targeted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You will notice all the people sent ones were promoting violence against Republicans.
    Biden - I want to punch Trump
    Clinton - You can't be civil
    DeNero - I want to punch Trump
    Booker - Get in their face
    Waters - Attack them
    Obama - They bring a knife you bring a gun
    Holder - They go low kick them
    and on and on...
    Every last person who got one was promoting violence on others. When it comes to them NOW its bad?

    You will notice Pelosi and Schumer were not targeted, neither of them were promoting violence against others. You will excuse me for not caring, especially after last week being told by multiple /.ers that violence against GOP and supporters was acceptable and to be encouraged (rsilvergun, PopeRatzo specifically)

  15. It's not that nefarious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you understand how OCR scanning works, you'd know they *have* to image the envelope, look for something that vaguely looks like an address (in various positions, orientations, etc), parse it, then route it through the sorting machines, etc all within seconds. It makes sense to store those images for training the software (wait until you find out that google stores your "ok google" requests, especially ones that it can't understand and sends them off to folks who manually listen and try to discern what the fuck you're asking for, etc.. and I'm not surprised if law enforcement can get at those records.

  16. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    It's a nice service, but in the email that they send me, every day, without fail, there is exactly one "mailpiece for which we don't currently have an image"

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  17. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    The other thing that I notice from this system is that mail from the UK is frequently scanned upside down.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  18. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    All of the photos of the packages show absolutely no post marks, barcodes, cancelled postage..
    [ ... blather deleted ... ]

    None of the packages shown have ever been in the USPS system, nor Fedex, UPS, etc, etc..
    What the fuck?

    The fuck is that you're an uninformed idiot.
    From Fact Check: 'Canceled Stamp' Conspiracy (a conservative opinion site, BTW):

    Lastly, the premise that if a stamp is not canceled it was therefore not mailed through the USPS is incorrect. As the executive director of the American Philatelic Society, Scott English, tells TWS Fact Check, “It is possible for mail to go through the mail without being cancelled by the USPS. There are still hand-stamped packages and in other cases, a postal clerk will use a magic marker to draw a line through stamps. There is no standard throughout the country.”

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  19. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    The arrested bomber's van is covered in pro-Trump stickers, and violent memes spread by republicans nationwide, like a gun target painted on a picture of Hillary Clinton.

    Right. Just like any stealthy terrorist would do, lol

    "There's a flag, so it can't be a false flag"

    You may apologize now.

    For what, wondering about yet another bizarre 11th hour thing happening?

    Trump should apologize for encouraging domestic terrorism.

    Which he has not encouraged. So, no.

  20. Re:Democrats don't share violent memes like GOP by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Informative

    Strange, because democrats were doing this for years. Until Giffords got shot, then it was a political faux pas all of a sudden.

    When a republican puts violent right wing memes spread by Trump and prominent republicans into action they deserve the blame.

    No power no peace! - Hillary Clinton
    Get up in their faces wherever they are. - Maxine Waters
    When they go low, we kick them while they're down. - Eric Holder
    Violence against patriots is collateral damage. - Nancy Polosi
    Need more marching, blood and death in the streets - Loretta Lynch

    And I'm only getting started. I'm also sure you think "violent rightwing memes" include pepe the frog, and the current NPC meme. But don't see calling peoples as nazi's, racists, fascists, white supremacists, race traitors, misogynists, and so on as a problem either.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  21. Government Conspiracy! by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    The USPS is just pretending to be incompetent to cover up their vast and efficient data collection. Think about it!

    Nut: The government is spying on our mail!

    Normal Person: The same people that delivered my mail to the house around the corner, and gave me mail for someone who moved 10 years ago? No way!

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  22. Just one thing wrong with your statement by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Troll

    Surprising nobody, the person sending bombs to Democratic

    They were not bombs - they were joke bombs. Fake Blews, as it were.

    If you want to look to people trying to do actual harm to opponents, there you will have to look for the insane left as opposed to the insane right (like the baseball field shooting).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Re:"Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nazis want to exterminate all jews. I think it's fair game to punch them. Why show them any civility?

  24. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    All of the photos of the packages show absolutely no post marks, barcodes, cancelled postage..

    [ ... blather deleted ... ]

    None of the packages shown have ever been in the USPS system, nor Fedex, UPS, etc, etc..

    What the fuck?

    The fuck is that you're an uninformed idiot.

    From Fact Check: 'Canceled Stamp' Conspiracy (a conservative opinion site, BTW):

    Lastly, the premise that if a stamp is not canceled it was therefore not mailed through the USPS is incorrect. As the executive director of the American Philatelic Society, Scott English, tells TWS Fact Check, “It is possible for mail to go through the mail without being cancelled by the USPS. There are still hand-stamped packages and in other cases, a postal clerk will use a magic marker to draw a line through stamps. There is no standard throughout the country.”

    You're a retard. That's simply stating that sometimes there's a fuckup and the worker PHYSICALLY MISSES when cancelling or FORGETS to cancel.
    Do you actually believe that somehow happened for all of these packages, at every point along the delivery?

  25. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Damn, STICKERS? They got him! We've NEVER seen anyone try to frame shit up as being done by someone else! Certainly not the DNC!!!

  26. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's called Informed Delivery. They email you images of what's arriving that day.

    https://informeddelivery.usps....

    My wife signed up for it, it's sort of creepy and exciting (at first).

    I would assume they image everything (at least letter sized) as part of sorting.

    I expect that this what Netflix uses to speed up delivery of DVDs. I regularly drop a DVD in the mail and Netflix will send out the next one in my queue well before the returning DVD will have made it to their wharehouse. So on one hand creepy, on the other hand faster turn around time for their service.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  27. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I didn't say anything about "every USPS and FBI employee" being in on a plot.

    A little more common sense would tell you they are all federal employees and legally bound not to disclose what happens at their workplaces.

    So why not address what I actually said? You wont. You glow in the dark.

    They would have to be in on the plot because any USPS worker could see what you saw and announce it. And the FBI, something as big as that would have to be quite extensively spread.

    For this to be a hoax you would literally have to have the entire USPS onboard not to announce the "no stamping thing" and out it as a hoax... and probably dozens of FBI agents. Like most conspiracy theories- you'd have to be nuts to believe it.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  28. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Those were examples. The operative phrase was, "It is possible for mail to go through the mail without being cancelled by the USPS." More to the point, I have actually received stamped mail that has no cancellation marks. Furthermore, the reports are that the packages, or majority, were courier / hand delivered. Don't really know why you're so cranked up, unless you're a crank that believes the conspiracy nonsense.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  29. Re:"Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by chiefcrash · · Score: 1

    It used to be the case that Nazis wanted to (and more importantly, actively worked towards) exterminating all the jews...

    Now the definition of a Nazi has shifted to include.... pretty much whoever you want to punch...

    For example: a bay area antifa group published a "most wanted" poster labeled "Know your Nazi". Their stretched definition of "Nazi" included figures such as Joey Gibson, a conservative agitator who publicly denounces white supremacists. Antifa sources consider Gibson guilty by association because white supremacists regularly show up at his rallies.

    Can you explain why it should be acceptable to punch someone like Joey Gibson?

    --
    Show me on the 1st Amendment bobblehead where the moderator touched you...
  30. They Might Be Giants. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    It goes deeper than that--

    the post office reads the address on every piece of mail!
    and they KNOW where YOU LIVE!

    Best to just not have an address so they can't FIND you!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:They Might Be Giants. by PPH · · Score: 2

      and they KNOW where YOU LIVE!

      That little box I have at the post office is getting pretty cramped.

      Interesting note: The post office will deliver mail addressed to their street address and my PO box number (as if it were an apartment address).

      Another interesting note: Federal law requires that I keep the post office informed of my actual residential address. Many years ago, when I moved, I went to my post office to fill out the requisite forms.

      Me: "I'm moving. What form do I have to fill out to update my residential address on record for my PO Box?"
      Clerk: "Oh, so you'll be giving up your box? Where would you like your mail forwarded?"
      Me: "No. Keep delivering my mail to my PO Box. I just need to update my address."
      Clerk: "I don't understand. What are we supposed to do with your mail?"
      Me: "Keep putting it in the little box over there. But I need to change my residential address, which is ... " (In an adjacent town)
      Clerk: "But we don't deliver to that location. You'll have to contact the post office in your town to arrange for delivery."

      After a few more minutes of playing 'Whos on first' with the clerk, I just thanked him and walked out. To this day, I'm not sure they know where I live. If this clerk ever came across a bomb, he'd probably start chewing on it.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  31. Yes they do - and buy radioactive material to harm by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Democrats don't share pictures of republicans with gun targets on their face.

    They have done so many times.

    What Democrats also do apparently is try to buy radioactive substances after telling at Republicans... instead of sending joke bombs that are not a threat.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by Xylantiel · · Score: 1

    Nope, that's just making things up. (This seems like typical Russian troll stuff.) Hillary Clinton violated policy in her email handling, but the investigation concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to make a case that she committed a crime. And the crime would have been about records retention, not classified info anyway. Any mishandling of classified info would have been done by her subordinates by moving material to a non-secure medium, regardless of if the email account was a state department one or not. You are just parroting made-up stuff.

  33. The Van ... by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This van looks like what Steve Bannon would turn into if he was a Transformer

    - Twitter

    1. Re:The Van ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's weird that he still loves Trump, even after Trump fired him, called him "Sloppy Steve" and suggested that he was mentally ill.

      His unrequited love is almost tragic.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by werepants · · Score: 2

    Is there any anti-Democrat conspiracy theory you WON'T believe? I used to think tin-foil hatters were just an exaggerated joke, but your posts are doing a great job convincing me otherwise. You better tighten that thing up another notch.

  35. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

    It is reasonable to ask pertinent questions and expect to receive pertinent answers for a matter of this importance.

    "If you don't believe the prevailing media narrative unquestioningly you must be a ridiculous conspiracy theorist" is an answer only an NPC could accept.

  36. And then there's the actual harm - to the GOP by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    No bombs sent to Democrats even got close to them, or went off...

    Unlike the bomb locally delivered to a GOP office.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:And then there's the actual harm - to the GOP by balbeir · · Score: 1

      No bombs sent to Democrats even got close to them, or went off...

      Oh, ok. The bomb maker was incompetent. That makes it a non-issue then.

      We prefer bomb makers that have their bombs go off

  37. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Does it happen to be a bulk mail thing? Since those are presorted, perhaps they don't go through the scanner.

  38. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by PPH · · Score: 1

    As for couriers, nope. They generally won't take shit with postage

    There exists a courier business that picks up and drops off US mail for business clients at the local post office. I see them all the time. They show up with a plastic tub full of mail and walk it up to the commercial service window. And they have keys to a half dozen PO Boxes to pick up clients' mail.

    It's possible that Sayoc hired one of these people to drop packages off. Hence the reference to a courier. And I imagine that postal workers drop their guard when they see the same guy they do every day hauling in a bunch of packages. "Sure Bob. Just pile them up in the corner and we'll get to them when we can."

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  39. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by Etcetera · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did you see the van with the back windows platered over with stickers?
    That van would not get a block before being pulled over and over and over again.

    You seriously underestimate the amount of crazy shit that exists on a day to day basis in Florida.

  40. Re:Yes they do - and buy radioactive material to h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >instead of sending joke bombs that are not a threat.

    You're so desperate to make this man seem like less of a nutjob that this is the line of thinking you're going with huh. Do I get to sit in a sniper's nest with a fake rifle on Capitol Hill or political rally because it's a "joke rifle" and "not a threat"?

  41. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    You may be right. I had always read it as "one mail piece", but perhaps it should be read as "at least one".

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  42. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Hillary Clinton violated policy in her email handling, but the investigation concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to make a case that she committed a crime.

    Now you're making things up. Quotes from Comey's statement:

    "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." Also: "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

    That latter statement is not "she's innocent" or "there's no evidence", it's a pretty clear "there is evidence" and "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case." He's right, no prosecutor is going to waste the time and effort to counter every legal maneuver that Clinton's team would make to try to avoid a guilty verdict. And nobody wants to take down the golden girl who "won the election" (if only the rules for how to win the election were different!)

  43. Re:How did it work, I wonder? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    "NPC"? Is that supposed to be some insult to dehumanize victims to make it OK to send them bombs?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  44. Re:The arrested bomber's van is covered in Pro-Tru by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

    They caught the guy. Florida man. He's one of you right loonies. Doesn't surprise me one bit that after evidence that you are wrong surfaced you changed the troll rather than admit you were wrong.

  45. Re:"Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Democrats do spread the "Punch a Nazi" meme.

    How many people have you Nazis killed by now?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  46. Obvious False Flag Is Obvious by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    The packages weren't postmarked when they were photographed on camera and released in news stories: they never went through the postal service.

  47. Re: "Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    Why does who you advocate copulating with warrant discussion here?

  48. Re:Yes they do - and buy radioactive material to h by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    I hadn't seen that Snoop Dogg video until just now.

    So, on the one hand you've got a rapper famous for smoking marijuana and saying stuff like "For shizzle" making a video where everyone appears in clown makeup and a toy gun that "fires" a tiny sign that says "Bang" is used to shoot a "Trump" clown and on the other hand we've got the actual President of the United States calling the press the "enemy of the people" and saying it's "unfortunate" that people expect him to have a coherent response to Khashoggi's murder.

    Trump has called for police to rough up suspects and for his followers to attack those who don't support him at his rallies. He even tweeted that Snoop Dogg deserves "jail time" for exercising his First Amendment rights.

    He literally said that anyone who can body-slam a reporter is "my kind of guy". That's a guy who plead guilty to a violent crime.

    No wonder Snoop doesn't share his joint with the clown in his video.

    "False equivalency" and "snowflake" are a couple of things that come to mind.

  49. Re:"Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    Joey Gibson invites groups like Identity Evropa to his rallies. White supremacists flock to him.

    He surrounds himself with The Proud Boys.

    I don't think it's all that extreme to think he's lying when he says he's not a White Supremacist.

  50. Re: "Punch a Nazi" is a Call to Violence by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    The crapflooding has gotten really weird around here.

  51. Re:USPS offers a service to "preview" your daily m by Oloryn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I've found Informed Delivery handy, particularly when watching out for a particular letter. Also, it's occasionally handy for adding a bit more debugging data for delivery snags. E.g., I live at 999 E Bargle-bargle Lane, and regularly find mail destined for 999 W Bargle-bargle Lane in my mailbox. The fact that it also shows up in my Informed Delivery emailing tells me that the problem is with USPS routing software, not with my local mailbeing. The misrouted mails generally appear to have WEST spelled out, so that may be relevant to the glitch. There seems to be no way to communicate this to whoever maintains the routing software, but I've told enough of my local mailbeings about it that they sometimes catch it and locally reroute. I get the impression that the USPS has no way for local mailbeings to communicate such routing bugs upward, though. One other nifty feature is that packages sent to me generally show up in the package side of the ID page, even if the sender didn't pay for a tracking number. I've seen the occasional "mailpiece for which we don't currently have an image", but I've noticed that they usually seem to be things like magazines. Local flyers, coupons, etc, though, never show up in ID, only first-class mail and packages.