Slashdot Mirror


Restaurants Shrink as Food Delivery Apps Get More Popular (bloomberg.com)

People are still eating restaurant food -- they're just not doing it at restaurants as much. From a report: Delivery apps from DoorDash, Postmates, GrubHub and UberEats have made ordering in easier, and have changed the way food chains think about their business. The number of food delivery app downloads is up 380 percent compared with three years ago, according to market-data firm App Annie, and research firm Cowen and Co. predicts that U.S. restaurant delivery sales will rise an average of 12 percent a year to $76 billion in the next four years. At Firehouse, revenue has increased 7 percent this year, mainly from orders placed online and through delivery apps, Fox said. More than half of his sales are for food eaten elsewhere.

[...] Some new restaurant owners are skipping tables and chairs altogether and just leasing kitchen space to prepare food for couriers. Those are called cloud kitchens or virtual restaurants because they have no dining rooms or wait staff and sell their meals through the internet and mobile apps like DoorDash or UberEats. Mark Chase, the founder of Restaurant Real Estate Advisors, a consulting group that helps restaurant entrepreneurs find space and negotiate leases, said that the majority of his clients are interested in the kitchen-only business model. "There is a general scaling down on seating space and scaling up on kitchen space, as people just want to eat at home, on the couch," Chase said.

95 comments

  1. That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a lot of us, a place like Firehouse is not exactly what we would call a 'restaurant'. I suspect it's mainly younger millennials that are reliant upon apps, and their tastes and proclivities will change. It's never a good idea to base business longevity on fads.

    1. Re:That would be relative by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What else would you call it? Its a place who's primary purpose is to serve food. Its not fine dining, or a particularly good restaurant, but its a restaurant.

      No, its a lot of people of all ages. I can get out of work at around 7, find a restaurant, hope they have a seat, wait for 30 minutes until they do, then get seated and go through an hour long process to eat. Or I can go home, hop on an app on the subway and order dinner delivered, have it arrive 20 minutes after I get home, and eat in a quick 15 minutes and get on with my evening. And I don't need to deal with waiters, crowds, noise, and I can do whatever I want while waiting and eating- shower, watch tv, play games, etc. Almost none of that is possible in a restaurant. Its the same reason why movie theaters are losing to home movie watching.

      They're not going to totally replace restaurants of course. Restaurants also serve the purpose of a place outside the house to meet, and many meals taste better hot out of the kitchen. But they'll definitely reduce the amount of dining in.

      If there's any demographic divide, it will be urban/rural. The apps make more sense in urban/suburban areas with high restaurant density (especially in old east coast cities where apartment kitchens leave much to be desired).

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:That would be relative by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is also not a good idea to base a business on a lowering trend as well.

      However it is difficult to determine what is a fad and what is a trend.

      A lot of people didn't get Color TV's because they though it was Fad, but it was a trend.
      A lot of people bought 3d TV's because they thought it was trend, but it was a Fad.

      Mail Order was a fad which got killed by Box Stores, while Online Shopping (nearly the same thing) is a trend which is killing Box Stores.

      The big Grocery Stores took over the Mom and Pop corner shop, but didn't do much against the convince stores.

      Now Restaurants are pushing the idea of the experience, while Millennials just want the food. Especially for the low - mid range restaurants (Think many of the chain restaurants). Where the food quality is OK, but not worth the hassle of going to a restaurant, waiting for your turn, getting bugged by waiters. Having to sit and wait for your food, be sure you behave so you don't get kicked out...
      Now this could just be a fad, as Millennial get older and more mature, will want to go for more of the experience. Or it could just be a trend, of wanting the restaurant food, at the home experience. Where you can just be relaxed.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:That would be relative by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem with this. It's not sacrificing market-share, rather opening it up to what otherwise would be a no sale. I've been to various restaurants where I much preferred dining in vs taking out, but I've done the takeout as well. For that exact same restaurant, the advantages of dining in include a hot meal, service, no cleanup, and socializing. With takeout, the food is just placed in plastic buckets or foam, isn't as appealing, but can eat when I want, how long I wish, and where at home. Bonus, can watch a move and whatnot.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:That would be relative by es330td · · Score: 1

      What I really like about this model is that eating good food becomes reasonable. While I am a decent cook, I don't have the ingredients on hand to make whatever I want any time. If I order food my money goes into food and I can drink iced tea for pennies instead of $1.89 + tax & tip or even better, all the alcohol I want without paying $10 a drink.

      Eating the entire meal out was reasonable when my wife and I first got married. Now with three kids, two who eat like adults, going out for a simple quick casual sit down meal costs $60-70 and $120 or more for a "nice" meal and that is before alcohol is considered.

    5. Re:That would be relative by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      A lot of people bought 3d TV's because they thought it was trend, but it was a Fad.

      Actually I think you'll find a lot of people bought 3D TVs because they made good TVs with high frame rates despite a fad feature they never ended up using. At least that's how it worked out for us. Our TV just happened to be a 3D one, it didn't at all come into the purchasing decision.

    6. Re:That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millennials just want the food.

      Where the food quality is OK, but not worth the hassle of going to a restaurant... Having to sit and wait for your food, be sure you behave so you don't get kicked out...

      Is behaving in a way that doesn't get them kicked out a challenge for millennials? Do they start campaigning on social justice issues between courses or is it that they're so easily offended they can't help making a scene? I can imagine it now:

      Waiter: Good evening sir, can I take your order?
      Millennial: Did you just assume my gender?! You Nazi! Fucking transphobic white supremacist! I need to go to my safe space!

    7. Re:That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail Order was a fad which got killed by Box Stores, while Online Shopping (nearly the same thing) is a trend which is killing Box Stores.

      Much like horses were a fad which got killed by cars.

      Mail order may have been a trend that has ended, but it was certainly not a fad.

    8. Re:That would be relative by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      What I am surprised about are the places people go specifically to eat out closing up. Anecdotal, but the local PF Chang's closed its doors, along with two restaurants nearby (one small, another same size as PF Chang's). I get rising rents make businesses review their options, but it seems odd for so many restaurants being closed in areas where people eat out a lot.

      Maybe it is just changing trends/demographics, but I really enjoy having meals out. Hope it doesn't go too far...

    9. Re:That would be relative by mikael · · Score: 1

      That was the problem in many busy cities like Silicon Valley or other university cities. You had a large party of 20 or 30 people, and wanted to go out for a work-day lunch to celebrate someone's promotion, but there wasn't anywhere large enough. Usually a group would have to be split up into separate tables, which really defeated the purpose of the party in the first place.

      There was one restaurant places that was basically a large warehouse with rows of tables and several different kitchens. That solved the problem but for smaller quieter parties, everyone went to smaller restaurants

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...if anything I expect we'll hit a point where food court/cafeteria style clubs will happen in the future.

      Even when meeting up for a meal these days there's often arbitrarily complex dietary restrictions for any number of reasons, but having a "club" style places that only provides seating/silverware/cleanup but are bring-your-own-food for meetups will happen eventually.

      We already have that for comic shops and gaming stores to some extent that have a guest/membership fee to attend, and as more and more places transition to delivery-only a small number of places can likely survive purely on providing that 'central meeting place to share a meal at' separately.

      Some landlords might even double-duty a location and lease out kitchens akin to how hairdressers/barbers will lease their chair at some chains, etc, more or less like a literal mall food court but just the food part, and optimized for delivery from all of the food options there so the focus isn't so much on "mall friendly" food.

      - WolfWings, too lazy to login to /. even when I have something to say.

    11. Re: That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have a couple of those in London (vs just a mall food court)

      https://www.boxpark.co.uk/

      I used to live near the Croydon one. To be honest, I didn't find it that good an experience. The food quality was much better than the usual McDonald's junk you get from food courts, but it still had the same noise problem. If I'm eating out I want to be somewhere I can sit and talk to people, not in a hyper noisy environment that sounds like a sports croud waiting for a game to start.

    12. Re:That would be relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some restaurants just close because they are just not in a good market and/or they are mismanaged. Maybe they might have survived a little longer but for the downward pressure created by delivery options, but some restaurants are just destined to fail even under the best of scenarios.

  2. cloud kitchen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those are called cloud kitchens"

    So.... because someone uses a phone to order delivery food, it's a cloud kitchen?

    1. Re:cloud kitchen?! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I think it has more to do with the complete lack of fixed location.

      These places can more easily move around to match demand, increase and decrease capacity.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:cloud kitchen?! by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      "Those are called cloud kitchens"

      So.... because someone uses a phone to order delivery food, it's a cloud kitchen?

      I always thought those were called takeout places. Or Chinese restaurants.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:cloud kitchen?! by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Even a takeout place still has a storefront, typically in an area with foot traffic. In a big city a space like that is a lot more expensive than a room on the third floor of a nondescript office building. All it needs is water, power, and ventilation.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    4. Re: cloud kitchen?! by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Only if they're operating illegally- do you know what a pain in the ass it usually is to get approval from the local city, county and/or state health department to operate a commercial kitchen??

    5. Re:cloud kitchen?! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      But often no place to sit down -- I recall a few even had bulletproof Lexan between the waiting area and kitchen. This was in a less-posh part of DC about 10-15 years ago.

    6. Re: cloud kitchen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need all that? I'll just microwave frozen burritos in the back of my van and hand them out to DoorDash/etc, lol.

    7. Re:cloud kitchen?! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting groceries to run a commercial kitchen up to the third floor, even with a freight elevator. Not to mention irate occupants of neighboring units from smells of cooking, delivery-guy foot traffic, etc.

    8. Re: cloud kitchen?! by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      No, only WRT to a food truck (which is already a huge PITA).

      Still, it's easier to move a kitchen than it is a storefront + a kitchen (does not apply to food trucks).

      There's also potential to lease from a place that does breakfast lunch and then you do deliveries dinner late night.

      When I was in nola there was a pop-up restaurant space (nola was obsessed with pop-ups, there were pop-up festivals around every corner in the garden district) that basically offered daily kitchen rentals, I can't speak to the legality, but it was clearly in a commercial space and the owner seemed like a stickler for rules.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:cloud kitchen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the bulletproof Lexan means it's a high-end establishment, like a bank.

    10. Re:cloud kitchen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      means n1ggers will shoot each other for a chicken sandwich

    11. Re: cloud kitchen?! by mikael · · Score: 1

      There's always something worrying about a backstreet Chinese restaurant offering Mock Chow Mein.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  3. hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am no liberal sympathy-monger riding on the bandwagon of local / artisanal / anti-gentrification / etc that thinks that all technology is bad. But the issue of how local restaurants are surviving is one that has hit home more than others. Specifically, how a lot of small restaurants, "mom-and-pop" to shorthand it, are at the mercy of middlemen, essentially who are extracting the profit out of the industry.

    Small restaurants have never been great at marketing, being super efficient in delivery, or getting rewarded with outsized profits for the service they provide, and now this layer of tech middlemen has come in to squeeze out the profit even more.

    I read the story about how Doordash and their ilk (I forget the specific service mentioned in the story exactly, but similar ordering service) basically takes over a restaurant's phone number, publishes it and diverts and monitors their calls to make sure they're paying an agreed % cut of every order. Even if Doordash did essentially nothing value adding for that order. The customers don't know anything different -- they're just ordering from their favorite restaurant using a convenient method.

    So basically the restaurant and its workers become a labor slave to Doordash because customer traffic has been channeled through Doordash, even though the restaurant has enough patrons to exist on its own. They pay a cut for people being able to press a button and have food appear, rather than walk down to the restaurant, or call the legit restaurant's phone number.

    So, how is the small guy ever to overcome the power of tech companies in a situation like this? Or how can you ever turn a profit as a small company when tech talent is out there to squeeze you as soon as you do?

    Pretty soon, I could imagine that we'll just become a country of order takers from some tech overlords, and be dominated by flavorless food dictated by corporate efficiency recipes. It's a little disturbing.

    1. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a common theme: the middlemen usually do provide a valuable add-on service, but once they are more or less indispensable, they jack up the rates. A popular restaurant reservation and rating service around here did just that... and at some point the restaurant owners (or rather, the hotel, bar and restaurant association) said "sod it, we'll make our own" (No not with blackjack and hookers). The service seems to be doing well and restaurants get it at cost. And people increasingly become appreciative of this issue, and actually make an effort to find out if they can order take-out from the restaurant directly, before hitting the usual food delivery sites.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by supernova87a · · Score: 2

      Here are some of the articles that talk about this:

      https://www.newyorker.com/cult...
      https://get.chownow.com/blog/restaurant-delivery-killing-restaurants

    3. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      That's not precisely the case: they typically publish a DIFFERENT phone # on a "menu" that shows up on Google search results. Easy enough to circumvent -- go there ones, get a paper menu, program the "real" phone number of the resto into your phone. Pay cash, and middlemen can go get fucked.

    4. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF does that have to do with liberal politics?

      That's right, absolutely sweet fuck all. Stick to the facts, and keep your shitty political attacks out of it. Most of the tech-heads I know lean more liberal than conservative.

    5. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Well.. According to the story the restaurant in question, Firehouse, has seen its revenue increase by 7% this year. So.. that's something. If, because of the service, this restaurant can sell more meals and collect more profit/revenue that it has tables for that is a good thing.. Traditionally once all your tables are full you're kinda stuck.. You can't take on new customer until one leaves. This seems to get around that problem.

      As for the middlemen.. Well, if a place doesn't even have tables/chairs for patrons, then I'd guess that the cost of the middle man is more than compensated for by not spending the money on wages for servers, buss boys, and a hostess. All you have to pay for is cooks and maybe someone to package up the orders..

      These trends aren't going away any time soon. We'll just have to learn to deal with them. Besides, it's probably a bit of a fad. I've ordered home food delivery a few times but, generally speaking, when I go to a restaurant it's because I want to go OUT. Being at home gets boring. You have to break it up a little bit here and there with time elsewhere.

    6. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is forcing companies to participate in door dash.

      If they can't compete without door dash and cant' stay in business - Fuck em. They were not that good to begin with.

      If you want to enact misguided laws to protect your nostalgic notion of how food "should" be - Fuck you.

    7. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "mom-and-pop" to shorthand it, are at the mercy of middlemen, essentially who are extracting the profit out of the industry.

      Something is better than nothing. When my wife and I have had a few beers and bong hits, we simply are not going out, period. It isn't going to happen. No way. Your sit-down restaurant's best case scenario is $0.00. Zip, nothing, nada. Restaurant loses, unconditionally.

      But if neither of us feel like cooking, you still might get a sale. However many pennies profit that middleman got you, was more profit than you were going to get. Restaurant wins.

      And OMG, these days we can finally have something other than pizza. So we win too.

      how can you ever turn a profit as a small company when tech talent is out there to squeeze you as soon as you do?

      Sell food. Grubhub doesn't have food. Uber doesn't have food.

      I could imagine that we'll just become a country of order takers .. dominated by flavorless food dictated by corporate efficiency recipes

      McDonalds and Walmart convenience meals have been a thing for decades. Yes, some customers are into it, but some aren't.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    8. Re: hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's no loyalty any more either. With things like Just eat (in the UK) I just to their site and I can search all the takeaways that deliver to me, read all the menus and place my order (and pay).

      My only interaction with the restaurant is when the delivery driver arrives. Why would I even care about going to all the hassle you describe when I can do it all from one app on my phone, and I'm not limited to one restaurant.

    9. Re: hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think it's more of an issue with takeaways. In the UK if you're a takeaway restaurant and you're not on just eat, you might as well not exist. They are pretty much are the gatekeepers of delivery food in the UK now.

      To be honest, I never really thought about the downside till now.

    10. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well, when the autochef becomes a thing, a big box in the corner with a couple of robohands, fridge, freezer, cook top, sink, oven and various utensils, all self cleaning, just add raw ingredients, sounds like you will be right at home all of the time.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by mlw4428 · · Score: 1

      "So, how is the small guy ever to overcome the power of tech companies in a situation like this?"

      Well...they could hire a delivery driver or two. Chinese takeout joints did this for years and pizza shops as well. It's nice to enjoy a dinner from a restaurant with out someone's annoying ass kid crying because of the lack of crayons or some other stupid thing that I don't give a shit about.

    12. Re:hidden behind the tech, restaurants suffer by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      If you're that sensitive to the restaurants plight, there's no way you could patronize uber or lyft.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  4. Great. Another reason to feel old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I *like* dining in a restaurant. If it's not busy, I'll even bring my phone and headphones and watch some Netflix. It's relaxing and sometimes you meet others. And it's a good reason to go for a walk outside of the house.

    I suppose this attraction to dining rooms will be a reason for my eventual grandchildren to call me old. Harumph!

  5. Meh. Define "restaurant" by TigerPlish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fast food? Yeah I'll have that to go.

    Mediocre chain establishment? I'll have that to go.

    Trendy fashionista place that serves kale and rabbitfood with a side of pretentious? I won't even spend a dime there, but if I had to, it'd be to go.

    Family-owned restaurant one has been visiting for the past 10 years? Nope, I'll make time to go there, have that glorious just-brewed tea, nod to the chef and without a word, food magically appears, to my taste, and eat while watching the kitchen do their thing.

    Not every restaurant deserves going to. Those that do... treasure them and treat them well.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  6. Re:nour by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    http://www.al-awa2el.com/%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%B3%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6/235-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%B3%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B6

    iPhone users must have just received another update....

  7. Re:Multiculturalism is all about keeping to yourse by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

    I'm sitting in a restaurant in NYC now, crowd is plenty diverse and I don't see anyone chimping out or spitting on each other. I think you're just a fuckin' coward.

  8. I don't want to eat on a couch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to sit at a table. Welp, guess I'll have to cook my own food then.

    1. Re: I don't want to eat on a couch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a table for like $100. Cheaper than paying the restraunt's mortgage for them.

  9. The absolute fucking state of the capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this really how you would choose to live, if you were free?

  10. Meh, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost overhead of the delivery places makes them not worth bothering with, especially if a $12 food item turns into a $36 food item, which is now lukewarm after sitting in a delivery vehicle for 30-90 minutes due to traffic.

    I rather just go someplace and eat out, or I might do something unheard of... and cook stuff.

    "Cloud kitchens". Definitely not a new concept. There have been places doing to-go stuff for years.

    1. Re:Meh, why bother? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      I just cook or (OMG!) go pick stuff up myself when I'd doing takeout. I get to walk a bit, no waiting for a messenger while the food gets cold. I also can pay good, old-fashioned, cold, hard cash, which is better for a small business than a crap card and delivery appitty-app taking a cut of their proceeds.

    2. Re:Meh, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a cost for eating-in at restaurants with table service, namely the "expected" 20% tip. That's a sizable premium for eating-in. Sure, delivery is mostly about convenience. However, the tip is another aspect that's further driving many to order out. Tipping needs to go away, but that's a whole topic in and of itself.

    3. Re:Meh, why bother? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      You tip someone who walks 50 feet indoors to deliver food to your table, but you don't tip someone who has to bike or drive for minutes to hours, often in bad weather? That's barbaric.

    4. Re:Meh, why bother? by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't think we should have mandatory tips, period. A tip should be a tiny bit extra if someone provides exceptional service. It should not be an expected minimum that the restaurant assumes so they can underpay their staff.

    5. Re:Meh, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don’t want to tip because I'm a cheap piece of shit.

      Fixed that for you.

  11. Re:If creimer ever finds out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  12. I like eating out by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I will admit that I have taken advantage of the fact that many fast food places make it easy to order online - I’ve done that many times (although I generally pick it up myself).

    But I also like the social nature of restaurants. It’s fun to share a meal with friends, sitting around and laughing, watching people walking by outside, etc. I can’t imagine always “eating in” - that would be sad and boring.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. Re: If creimer ever finds out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So.. pay restaurant prices (that includes the artificially inflated price to pay for a dining space), plus pay around 50% of that food cost in terms of a delivery fee/tip... it's no wonder why they want to move to that direction.

  14. Yeppers, this is late-stage capitalism by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Funny

    Going out to lunch, going for a nice walk, and sitting down for 45 minutes is seen as anti-social and unproductive. After all, you could be working more and having lunch at your desk like a good little worker-bee.

    1. Re:Yeppers, this is late-stage capitalism by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      Going out to lunch, going for a nice walk, and sitting down for 45 minutes is seen as anti-social and unproductive. After all, you could be working more and having lunch at your desk like a good little worker-bee.

      Dunno where you observe that at, but every IT shop I've been to since... oh man.. what.. 2000? has frowned on eating at your desk and not going out to lunch. Sure, bring it in, but take it to the breakroom, stretch your legs.

      Some specifically say they want you to step out have a walk and clear the brain.

      But yes, I'm sure there are little shops of horrors that behave as you describe... and if I ever find myself in one, the next thing I'd do is start lookin' for another job. To hell with the frame of mind you describe.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    2. Re:Yeppers, this is late-stage capitalism by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or I could sit in my underwear in my flat, watching the TV channel (or netflix show) I want, actually hearing the TV instead of loud, obnoxious assholes, in my comfy couch instead of some chair that were designs more for looks than comfort while waiting for my food.

      Then eat that food while still watching my preferred show in a comfy chair, drink from a large coke bottle that cost about as much as a glass of that stuff would cost at a sit-down restaurant...

      you get the idea.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Yeppers, this is late-stage capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just the big corporate overlords like IBM, Equifax, etc.

  15. No thanks ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I go to restaurants because I like the experience. Some I go to because they're small shops where the owner is the guy in the kitchen cooking my food and waves to me.

    My favourite restaurant is one my wife and I will only go to 2-3 times a year, because we're going to sit and have several courses, drinks, and desserts and then walk home. But the head waitress knows us by name, and the chef/owner is 10 feet away making my food and occasionally chatting with me, and will happily tweak dishes within reason for our tastes.

    I have no intention of letting these tech companies be the ones getting the money, and I've even heard in a few cases restaurants have stopped supporting Uber Eats because Uber didn't pay them, or that the Uber driver is stealing the food.

    No thanks, I'll support local business, and not some douchy tech company in California. Bummer for the Uber drivers who are essentially making nothing, but that was never viable economically and not my problem.

    My hard working waitress who brings me fresh beer, smiles, and checks in on me ... I'm far more interested in making sure she gets a nice tip, because she's probably been friendly to me and recognised me and made sure I had a good meal -- and I'm old enough to place value on that.

    I have an affinity for the service industry, because unless you're an asshole, there's lots of nice, hard-working people who do their best to give you a good experience. They deserve the tips and everything else, not Uber.

    I just hope this idiotic 'everything is an app' culture doesn't keep wrecking the good bits of our actual culture.

  16. and who pays when the 1099 driver get's in crash? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and who pays when the 1099 driver gets in a crash? and there auto insurance does not pay as they don't don't cover Commercial use?

  17. Re:If creimer ever finds out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention the noise. 24 hours a day of boxes tearing open, the awful slurping munching noises interrupted by throwing up, only to start again within seconds.

  18. lot's of pizza places are pickup / delivery only by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    lot's of pizza places are pickup / delivery only with maybe an very small seating area for waiting.

  19. Middleman value-adds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch out for the value-added ingredients like Cialis, Viagra, & thallium.

  20. Re:Great. Another reason to feel old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I *like* dining in a restaurant. If it's not busy, I'll even bring my phone and headphones and watch some Netflix.
    I must say, you are a total weirdo. You will not have grandchildren because you will surely die a virgin.

  21. Re:Multiculturalism is all about keeping to yourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pissing in your soup in the kitchen whitey

  22. Re:Great. Another reason to feel old. by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    How do you meet others if you are watching Netflix?

    Now I feel old.. I can't even imaging going to a restaurant and watching TV on my phone.. with headphones on... like.. WTF?

  23. pretty cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a pretty damn cool development, for people in their own city. How can any restaurant be even 1% as nice as your own hovel? OTOH I can see how tourists would hate it. Hotel rooms ain't home.

  24. Re: If creimer ever finds out by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Good point: pay restaurant prices plus the delivery markup to eat on your couch? Unlike the mall movie experience, the restaurant experience is still much better than being at home.

  25. Re:Meh. Define "restaurant" by Kulahan · · Score: 1

    Agreed. There are a few places I'll specifically go to because the atmosphere is great, or because the employees are awesome, or because it has an awesome view or whatever.

    But I'll be honest - I just checked, and there are 12 different indian places on my Uber Eats list. I don't feel like driving 20 minutes across town to buy some food from one of these random places. Not to mention, my average delivery tip is $4, plus an average delivery fee of $3. I typically end up tipping at LEAST that much when I go to an actual restaurant... so why would I ever go to an actual restaurant? More expense for the same food in a less comfortable location predicated by a 20-30 minute drive? (not to mention, I can only have one beer because I still need to drive home). Yeah, aside from a few exceptions, there's no good reason to bother with it.

    There's a reason these things got popular, and it's because going out to most restaurants isn't a great experience.

  26. Slightly off-topic... by Kulahan · · Score: 2

    But what bothers me is the fact that ANYONE uses the ones that make you tip *before* the actual food arrives. It'd be like walking into a restaurant and tipping your future waitress. Uber Eats is the only one that doesn't do this in my experience, and once I discovered that, I deleted the other apps and never looked back. What a ridiculous layout. Who puts up with that!?

    1. Re:Slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I have ever seen anyone order food with an app.

    2. Re:Slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T.I.P.S.

      To Insure Prompt Service

    3. Re:Slightly off-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insure? So if you don't get prompt service an insurance company compensates you, or did you mean "Ensure"?

  27. Re:Multiculturalism is all about keeping to yourse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diversity brings distrust

    If you're a total asshole, which we could gather by your use of the phrase "chimp-out."

  28. interesting concept by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    sounds interesting but I hate to see the menu prices and the delivery charges then you need to tip. could get expensive. Personally I like going to restaurants and eat. it is good to have young pretty ladies talk and pay attention to me since I have gotten old and fat. Yea, I know they are only doing it for tips but still...

  29. Re:Meh. Define "restaurant" by hey! · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you find kale pretentious? Isn't that a little pretentious?

    Frankly, I hate the stuff, but I can't wrap my brain around acting superior to someone who does.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  30. Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a group of millenials go to a restaurant, sit, order and wait for their food, with all that down time, they might be forced to socialize and talk to each other at the table. Sure, if they had the cell phones, they still wouldn't need to, but why go to a restaurant where they could do the exact same thing without that experience?

  31. Re: Meh. Define "restaurant" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like you :)

  32. Yum! Cold food that used to be hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once most restaurant food gets cold, there's almost nothing that can salvage it. Door to door delivery service has the main problem of food getting cold fast. When you are at the restaurant, at least the food has a better chance of being piping hot.

  33. Projecting tomorrow from today rarely works by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    It's like poke, or frozen yogurt, even this "food app" is a fad that will die off as the Millennials complete household formation and run out of cash to waste on food delivery that costs that much.

    The smart ones will be buying meal recipe fridge/stoves that order all the components for their picky kids to eat, and cook their food at home from updated recipes. I call it Homer Cooking (tm).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  34. Re:and who pays when the 1099 driver get's in cras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares. I don’t give a flying fuck about the driver. Who brings me my food when they crash?

  35. Re: If creimer ever finds out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was thinking the same thing....why pay restaurant prices, delivery charge, etc....to eat in the "ambiance" of your kitchen....a major part of dining out is actually dining out

  36. Sad trend - phone addiction? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I live in two cities. One is wealthy. One in poor. In the wealthy city, people love to go out to eat. In the poor city, nobody goes out to eat.

    It's really sad to see so many empty restaurants in this big city, and delivery people just taking out styrofoam boxes all night. It's sad. These people generally don't leave their houses. Walking around is unheard of (it's a very walkable big city). I don't where or if most people in this city socialize very much at all. I imagine they work all day, then come home and want to keep staring at a little screen all night because they're addicted, like most of their friends and family.

    In the rich city, people like going out to eat. It's fun. You get to eat good food. You get to talk to friends and family. I'm kind of thinking that people in poor areas just don't do that anymore. The screen addiction is kind of insane there.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  37. Re:Meh. Define "restaurant" by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you find kale pretentious? Isn't that a little pretentious?

    No, kale in and of itself just is. It is incapable of demonstrating emotion or .. anything.

    The joints I've been to that make it a central part of "who they are" I find unbearably pretentious. They didn't waste any time in rubbing in how better life is *their* way vs the "normal" way.

    So I stick to places that just serve delicious food without judgement or sermon.

    I only visit the pretentious kind when I'm with coworkers of a certain culinary persuasion anyway. It's not by choice, it's out of politeness, and frankly, some of the food *is* quite nice. Just.. lay off the sermonizing, be it active by the staff, or passive by decor.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  38. Re: If creimer ever finds out by jezwel · · Score: 1

    the restaurant experience is still much better than being at home.

    Try that same experience with young children, and I guarantee you will rethink that statement.

    Before kids, yes you are right on the money.

  39. Re:lot's of pizza places are pickup / delivery onl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This applies even to chain restaurants. Some are pick-up only. And then there's the take-and-bake variety.

  40. It's replacing cooking at home, not restaurants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see it purely as a growth market, and what's shrinking is the time people are willing to spend preparing their own meals. When new "restaurants"(I prefer to call them food delivery services) open with little or no eat-in, this has little impact on those that want to go out with family and friends, enjoy a nice meal and have a couple of drinks. Every local restaurant I've talked to refer to the doordashes and foodoras of the world as a necessary evil. Many of them won't offer food to them at peak hours, simply because they can't keep up. That means they're being successful serving patrons, they aren't disappearing.

    It's about time management - it's becoming more and more precious(justified or not), so this will grow. Exhausted workers getting home late that just want to eat weren't going out anyway. For a bit more money they get yummies delivered rather than doing it themselves.

  41. Re: If creimer ever finds out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't go to restaurants any more for the same reason that I don't go to movies any more: it's an expensive yet unpleasant experience. In most cases, the product sucks, too. And in addition, it's generally unhealthful.

  42. You mean... by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    ...I can still get my favorite programs without paying my (monopolistic) cable provider's rates?

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon