Slashdot Mirror
Amazon Plans To Split HQ2 Evenly Between Two Cities, Report Says (wsj.com)
Amazon plans to split its second headquarters evenly between two locations rather than picking one city for HQ2, WSJ reported Monday, citing a person familiar with the matter, a surprise decision that will spread the impact of a massive new office across two communities. From the report: The driving force behind the decision to build two equal offices in addition to the company's headquarters in Seattle is recruiting enough tech talent, according to the person familiar with the company's plans. The move will also ease potential issues with housing, transit and other areas where adding tens of thousands of workers could cause problems. [...] The report, published Monday, did not specify the locations Amazon is exploring, but on Sunday, the newspaper had reported that the ecommerce giant was in late-stage discussions with Crystal City in Virginia, Dallas and New York City. [The aforementioned link may be paywalled; here's an alternative source.]
story is paywalled
A master, and an apprentice.
Not just a humorous Star Wars reference, you know that Amazon will make one city a gulag of undesirables, and the other city where all of the golden people go to shine.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
when you can have two? It's double the incentives.
Seattle - One head
Place B - half head
Place C - half head
Split headed? Three headquarters? Not really. Just one. Amazon has other offices. Okay, that's great.
Then they can play the 2 cities against each other to maximize incentives/bribes!
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
Wouldn't that have the highest costs of any city they considered?
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
"It was the best or times it was the blurst of times"
THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI KEN DOLL
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
I still don't understand how multiple headquarters is supposed to work. The purpose of a headquarters is to have a place to get ideas in front of the decision maker. Is Bezos going to spend a week each month at each location?
If he isn't there, it isn't really headquarters. It sounds to me like a giant grift for taxpayer money.
I've seen similar stunts in the past.
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
I'd believe the Crystal City over everything else. That's where a lot of big government/defense deals go down, and Amazon is probably just giggling to itself after some Google employees decided to stage antiwar demonstrations over the past few months. (Heck, if I was Amazon, I might be paying my competitor's employees to act up.) The GCP and Microsoft Azure cloud platforms are for real (unlike, say, Oracle/IBM "clouds") and both work better in many instances than Amazon's, but if Amazon can lock itself in as the first provider of federal cloud services (and just maybe let them look at peoples' purchase history once in a while) then it's smiling all the way to the bank.
I don't know that.
Oh, you will. you will.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
In that case, I'd have guessed Minneapolis/St. Paul.
for corporations in US at least it would. You send females to city F and males to city M and you avoid sexual harassment cases at least between females and males. The one sex cases will still be possible but this is as of now minority so we can cater for that when there is need.
They want to have an office in multiple regions for failover reasons.
We all know southerns can barely turn on a computer. They dont want to put all their eggs in one basket, after all who has came out of DFW or Dulles?
John Carmack and id Software came out of DFW, for one.
Know how I know you haven't been to Texas? DFW, Austin, and Houston all have vibrant tech communities.
Or maybe you did know that, and you just felt like being an arrogant twat.
So what they are saying is that they're gonna have
HQ 2.1
and
HQ 2.b)
Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
A/B testing is always the better plan .
When one city doesn't deliver as expected you already have the backup to move operations into and start your next B test plan.
Time to decide, Seattle? Are you going to stay woke and go broke? Or are you going to up your game to compete with better cities?
Both Dallas and Fort Worth.
"The move will also ease potential issues with housing, transit and other areas where adding tens of thousands of workers could cause problems."
They're concerned about housing for tens of thousands of workers and they're considering New York City as one of the options? I haven't lived there myself, but from everything i've heard decent, reasonably priced housing is not something that can be found in New York City.
This Space Intentionally Left Blank
If you have 3 headquarters, it's not really "headquarters". Just call them "major business centers" or something else big-but-nebulus (which sounds like an alt-rock band).
Table-ized A.I.
They're not going to have two headquarters on the east coast. And, Dallas is super Fortune 100 friendly. Additionally, it has a reasonable cost of living, and the same I am sure can be said of Crystal City, VA. Seems highly unlikely to me you'd want your new HQ in one of the most competitive and expensive labor markets in the country.
They are turning in to the same type of defense contractor company. They setup a part of the business in multiple states. The get huge contracts and handouts from the government, states, cities, etc. If the incentives will never dissappear because no senator wants to be responsible for the vote that made amazon leave the area, taking 20k jobs with it. It's the same thing defense contractors do. 18 billion dollar contracts keep flowing into them, and they split the work between multiple state locations. That ensures no senator will vote against the contract, because if they do, the project shuts down, so do the plants, and that state loses the multiple thousands of jobs.
Same formula, different company.
Much better general transport access, land for a distro center, and still close the city.
That would be completely idiotic. Pick a city. Stop this nonsense. #FFS
Traffic is already a fucking nightmare in/around Austin, most of the time. Adding another few thousand people and their cars wonâ(TM)t change anything. It would be like worrying about ocean-level rise because some guy just throw the ice from the bottom of his styrofoam cup into the ocean. Yes, technically, I suppose the average height of the ocean will rise from that, but weâ(TM)re talking about a minescule fraction of a yoctometer. Youâ(TM)d never notice it.
What Austin really needs is to build a new Austin somewhere near by, with LOTS of traffic capacity, and let people move to that. And get rid of the fucking tolls on 183A and 620 or whatever that other one is.
Or maybe just raze Leander and build it there. Place is a shithole anyway.
One fourth each, right?
Add 25K employees to Crystal City? YGBSM! I thought the plan was to avoid congestion.