Slashdot Mirror


Existing Laser Technology Could Be Fashioned Into Earth's 'Porch Light' To Attract Alien Astronomers, Study Finds (mit.edu)

If extraterrestrial intelligence exists somewhere in our galaxy, a new MIT study proposes that laser technology on Earth could, in principle, be fashioned into something of a planetary porch light -- a beacon strong enough to attract attention from as far as 20,000 light years away. From a report: The research, which author James Clark calls a "feasibility study," appears today in The Astrophysical Journal. The findings suggest that if a high-powered 1- to 2-megawatt laser were focused through a massive 30- to 45-meter telescope and aimed out into space, the combination would produce a beam of infrared radiation strong enough to stand out from the sun's energy. Such a signal could be detectable by alien astronomers performing a cursory survey of our section of the Milky Way -- especially if those astronomers live in nearby systems, such as around Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to Earth, or TRAPPIST-1, a star about 40 light-years away that hosts seven exoplanets, three of which are potentially habitable. If the signal is spotted from either of these nearby systems, the study finds, the same megawatt laser could be used to send a brief message in the form of pulses similar to Morse code.

37 of 257 comments (clear)

  1. Is it a good idea? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Imagine some primitive stone age tribe living in some island in the Pacific. Never knew if they were alone on the Earth or some other humans existed elsewhere. Some Chief gets the bright idea to send smoke signals so that if there are people somewhere in the ocean they will know there are people on this island.

    Any tribe that had such an idea in the 15th and 16th century would have been run over and destroyed before they even know what was happening.

    Why would you assume the aliens will be any less brutal than the 16th century European explorers?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Is it a good idea? by Kulahan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It wouldn't even be that close. It would be like if we had another 500 years to develop our military technology, and these were people who had never even seen electricity harnessed before. We show up with fucking mech walkers and sniper rifles with 2 mile ranges and fighter jets that are naked to the human eye and they're throwing rocks and sticks at us.

      Any alien that can come say hello would be so far out of our league we'd be like ants to them - barely smarter than the monkeys and dogs and kangaroos around us as far as they're concerned.

    2. Re:Is it a good idea? by Kulahan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I didn't have my coffee. I meant fighter jets that are *invisible* to the *naked* eye.

      Though jets with giant dongs would be similarly terrifying I suppose.

    3. Re:Is it a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Humans are brutal in general, regardless of tribal identity or history. There's this weird recent idea that western=bad, primitive-people=good, and it's just as idiotic as the reverse that people used to believe. The Noble Savage and all that shit like you might see in Dances With Wolves. It's all a lot of malarky. It's hippie nonsense stemming from the belief that modern society is corrupt, and somehow living in caves was some wonderful, freeing thing where it was some great society.

      Why does either extreme not understand human nature? Go read Lord Of The Flies. That's what humans are actually like.

    4. Re:Is it a good idea? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      That's my thoughts. Great idea - turn on your porch light to let people know you exist. The problem is that we might be living in a bad neighborhood, cosmically speaking.

      There might be things on the lookout for a nice habitable planet. Not what we want to attract.

    5. Re:Is it a good idea? by GoTeam · · Score: 2

      I'd be more worried that the intergalactic FAA will be pissed that we're shooting lasers throughout the galaxy. What if one of those laser beams were to hit a space pilot in the eye? Who would pay the fine? What kind of payment would they accept? We clearly have not thought this through yet.

    6. Re: Is it a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've seriously never heard of the "Noble Savage" concept? Because it's a concept that criticizes the sort of thing you're upset about. I think you've misunderstood the comment you're replying to.

    7. Re:Is it a good idea? by gumpish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a hard time imagining the mindset of someone who thinks interstellar civilizations will be like Vikings, but with space ships.

    8. Re:Is it a good idea? by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

      Why would you assume the aliens will be any less brutal than the 16th century European explorers?

      If there were an alien race so advanced as to be able to travel huge distances to the tune of thousands of light years then they wouldn't care less about the Earth because with their abilities they could travel to and harvest any other much closer planets which we've found aplenty. You just cannot even fathom such an advanced civilization.

      In fact a lot of scientists think that we're not alone in the universe but other civilizations are either too far away from us, or they visited us briefly in the past, found pretty stupid dinosaurs and left, or they've been watching us all along but they just don't believe we're intelligent enough to deal with them as they are practically Gods and we're practically ants for them. How often do you stop to talk to ants? Do you even treat ants as intelligent? That's what we might be for intergalactic spacefaring civilizations.

      Also, just also, I would love Earth to be conquered by hostile aliens as we are currently doing everything to go extinct and take Earth with us. Maybe, just maybe we deserve some culling and really intelligent governance. Also, this civilization will most likely bring a ton of knowledge, immortality, genome editing, nano tech, a cure for all diseases, AGI, unlimited fusion and fission, the knowledge of this universe (why it's here at all) and many things which look unattainable for us at the moment.

    9. Re:Is it a good idea? by jpaine619 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that you insist on referring to non-Western Europeans as "savages" strongly indicates that you're a dickhead.

      That's what they were referred to as, at the time. Better get back inside before you melt, snowflake.

    10. Re: Is it a good idea? by e3m4n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It was literally the last warning from Steven Hawkings. History is full of examples of what happens when one civilization meets another civilization that is vastly ahead in technology. It has always ended badly for the ones with inferior technology.

      https://www.sciencealert.com/s...

    11. Re:Is it a good idea? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He is not calling non-westerns "Savages". He is referring to the LITERARY TROPE of the Noble Savage (and calling it stupid): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Try a little harder to be offended?

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    12. Re:Is it a good idea? by k2r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > So why is AC still using the term "savages" to refer to non
      > Western European cultures, and why the fuck are you defending the practice?

      And why the fuck don’t you at least TRY to educate yourself on the term “Noble Savage” and it’s contemporary usage which is exactly criticizing the pseudo-positive racism, colonialism and paternalism that is inherent in the combination of those words.

      Bah, all hope is lost if even people on your side of the trench can’t be bothered to think.

    13. Re:Is it a good idea? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Our educational system has done a good job teaching our own people that Western culture is the worst that the world has ever produced. It's not. Go and check the actual figures for the 20th Century. Most are by China (PRC), Russia, Japan, China (KMT), Cambodia, and other non-Western cultures. Who remembers the Indonesian genocide? The Pakistani genocide of 1971? Nobody, because it doesn't serve the political purpose of convincing people that the West is the worst.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. If Extra Terrestrials exist... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If we're not alone in the universe- I would like to know about our neighbours before they know about us.

    Sending an unsolicited welcome beacon into the night could be catastrophic. If they're able to read it and respond they're probably more advanced than us. If they're more advanced than us they might not want to share the galaxy with another species who one day might evolve to challenge them or threaten them. There is no guarantee that any aliens out there would share our sentimentality to life. Or even want to meet alien species.

    If their civilization has advanced far enough to be guided by Artificial Intelligence, certainly AI would decide the logical thing to do is remove a future threat before it becomes a threat. This isn't Star Trek, you can't guarantee that Mr. and Mrs. Greenface want to drink Romulan Ale with you and be best buds with you. Any species that survives to the space age needs some logic. Logic will tell you intelligent alien species could be a potential threat.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:If Extra Terrestrials exist... by Merk42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they've evolved past needing meat and became vegetarian! Then they'll come to Earth and never shut up about it.

    2. Re:If Extra Terrestrials exist... by iisan7 · · Score: 2

      It seems to me that logic doesn't give a clear answer, as (1) cooperation may help your civilization to grow and exploit more faster; development is not a zero sum game; (2) any alien civilization should also expect that there is probably out there a more advanced alien civilization that it would need to compete with, and it might aid and use ally itself with smaller threats to defend itself against the larger threat. Ultimately, which approach is taken would probably be decided more by the context in which the alien society evolved.

    3. Re:If Extra Terrestrials exist... by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Assuming the extra terrestrial life is well more advanced than we are, it stands to reason that they can detect us whether we broadcast a beacon or not. Given sufficient technology to travel between star systems, they probably have sufficient technology to properly scout out star systems before starting the journey...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  3. That's a serious ping time by Nkwe · · Score: 2

    a star about 40 light-years away that hosts seven exoplanets, three of which are potentially habitable. If the signal is spotted from either of these nearby systems, the study finds, the same megawatt laser could be used to send a brief message in the form of pulses similar to Morse code.

    So this would be an 80 year round trip ping time? Someone far away would also have to be looking our direction when we light it up. For argument's sake let's say we want to allow a 10 year window for someone to notice our beacon. This means that we would have to shine the beacon for 10 years and then wait up to 90 years for a response?

    1. Re:That's a serious ping time by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's okay! It's only 1 or 2 megawatts continuously for those 10 years!

      That's only $21 million in electricity costs alone, and 100,000 metric tons of CO2 added to the atmosphere. Surely, that's a small price to pay to be good celestial neighbors...

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:That's a serious ping time by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's okay! It's only 1 or 2 megawatts continuously for those 10 years!

      That's only $21 million in electricity costs alone, and 100,000 metric tons of CO2 added to the atmosphere. Surely, that's a small price to pay to be good celestial neighbors...

      So.....just the equivalent of a handful of bitcoin miners? That's not too bad.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  4. Remember Stephen Hawking's warning by atrex · · Score: 2

    “Meeting an advanced civilization could be like Native Americans encountering Columbus. That didn’t turn out so well.”

    1. Re: Remember Stephen Hawking's warning by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's where he was wrong; it turned out very well.

  5. Re:Yeah, just what we need by Tuidjy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, if the laser is red, you can hardly blame the aliens for 'red light district' being an universal concept. And if it is not, then we should not risk advertising our present with other hues, either.

    Basic prudence dictates that we do not attract attention to ourselves before knowing what that attention will bring along.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
  6. DON'T FUCKING DO IT by F34nor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Read "The Three Body Problem" before you talk about this shit.

  7. The 3 Body Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want a awesome book series about this exact type of thing, I recommend `The Three Body Problem`. It's a great book to get into (translated) Chinese scifi literature

  8. Obligatory xkcd by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What, nobody has posted the obligatory xkcd yet?

    fish.

    ... and also, are you sure we're looking for the right thing? ants

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  9. Re:How much RF energy do we broadcast? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's indistinguishable from background noise a few light years out. Hence the entire point of this study on how to purposefully send a signal that is distinguishable at a distance.

    No. Check your facts.

    He's correct: our RF broadcasts are indistinguishable from background noise at even a few parsecs distance. The stars turn out to be a very very long way away.

    There are two exceptions: the Arecibo planetary radar, and ballistic missile warning radars.

    But the Arecibo dish is very rarely used as radar, and if it did by coincidence happen to illuminate a star with inhabited planets behind the planet it was looking at... it's likely that it would never point that direction again, ever. The aliens would see one bright blip--if they were looking with an Arecibo sized radio telescope at the right frequency at exactly the right time--but if they look again, nothing.

    Ballistic missile warning radar would be more repeatable, but it sweeps small parts of near-polar sky with a repeat time of 24 hours. So, if they see the blip as the radar passes over their star, unless they look again exactly 24 hours later, again, they won't see anything.

    And, at a hundred parsecs, even those signals are too faint to detect-- they're swamped by the background. The galaxy is 100 thousand parsecs across. So, no: most of the galaxy couldn't hear us even if they had Arecibo-sized telescopes listening.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  10. Re:Yeah, just what we need by dunnomattic · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If they take the ship, they'll rape us to death, eat our flesh, and sew our skins into their clothing. And, if we're very, very lucky, they'll do it in that order."
    -Zoe, Firefly (2002)

    --
    ...when everything is a crime, everyone is a criminal.
  11. Re:Yeah, just what we need by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    "Of course they're cute NOW. But in a second they're going to turn MEAN and UGLY somehow and then there are going to be a million MORE of them! ... Jesus, didn't ANY of you watch the show!?"

    -- Guy Fleegman, Galaxy Quest (1999)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  12. Generating new light? by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't it be a better idea to focus the gigawatts of excess solar energy our planet is absorbing every day, and help fight climate change at the same time?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  13. chance of success - infinitesimal by swell · · Score: 2

    "Such a signal could be detectable by alien astronomers performing a cursory survey of our section of the Milky Way -- especially if those astronomers live in nearby systems, such as around Proxima Centauri, the nearest star to Earth"

    The good people at MIT seem to have overlooked a small detail. Space is really big. Douglas Adams discovered this long ago- please bone up on your studies.

    In order to scan the universe with your narrowly focused telescope, you need to be able to see a width of 360 degrees and vertically at 360 degrees. Virtually an infinite number of adjustments in both directions. In order to see the puny laser beam, you'd have to pause your telescope in that direction long enough to identify it and separate it from nearby noise; perhaps for a few seconds(10?) If every position of the telescope requires 'a few seconds', it would take an extremely long time to scan the universe.

    From the other perspective- if you want to point your laser to every point in the sky, you have the same problem. A nearly infinite number of points, depending upon the width of the beam. If you are sending some kind of signal, let's say a burst that takes a few seconds (10?) in each direction, it would take an extremely long time to beam across the universe.

    What are the chances that your beam and the telescope at the other planet will meet?
    Infinitely small.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:chance of success - infinitesimal by swell · · Score: 2

      Ah, but suppose you aim your beam at a specific planet that seems as if it might possibly support life? Well, now you can aim your beam right there! But first, you have to remember that you are seeing the star/planet as it was a long time ago. You have to calculate from its heading where it might be when your beam arrives, far into the future. That seems possible. But then you have to correct for every gravitational field and other anomaly between here and there that will bend your beam and send it off in another direction. And after all that work and expense, you have only accounted for one possible life supporting planet- how many others will you waste your time on?

      Sorry, I'm taking a negative tone here. But here on earth, we have some real problems that will require the best brains and a lot of investment to deal with. Space will be there, space can wait.

      --
      ...omphaloskepsis often...
  14. Its too early by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We are not ready for ET.

    Here are some possible outcomes:
    They are dangerous and if they come here they have better technology than we do - we're screwed.

    They are nice beings, but correctly conclude we are not. They decide its better to eradicate us before we become the scourge of the galaxy - we're screwed.

    They are curious but see no benefit in engaging with us directly

    They are not curious and correctly conclude we have nothing to offer their more advanced society. The universe is a big empty place and there is space enough for everyone.

    My personal favorite - faster than light travel is fantasy and they will never bother to come.

    In any case, the likelihood that they are wondrous benevolent beings who want to give us all kinds of nice stuff without unintended consequences is basically zero. No need to attract attention. Do something useful instead.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Its too early by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 2

      "In any case, the likelihood that they are wondrous benevolent beings who want to give us all kinds of nice stuff without unintended consequences is basically zero. No need to attract attention. Do something useful instead."

      I would add, is probably the result of a residual idea of wanting a God or gods to come to our aid and explain the universe to us.

      --
      âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  15. We Subgenii have a saying: by sheramil · · Score: 2

    "DON'T Pray. You never know what might be listening."

    It would be a monumental effort, but perhaps a less dangerous method might be to set up the laser in the Centaurus system. That way, if any "bad people show up" (cf The Beastie Boys), they might not notice us. Too bad if there are any intelligent Centaurans, but they should have thought of this first and put a laser in OUR system.

  16. Re:Yeah, just what we need by xQx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Agreed.
    Let me link you the Fermi Paradox: We're First, We're Rare, or We're Fucked.
    https://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05...

    Specifically Possibility 4: There are scary predator civilizations out there, and most intelligent life knows better than to broadcast any outgoing signals and advertise their location. This is an unpleasant concept and would help explain the lack of any signals being received by the SETI satellites. It also means that we might be the super naive newbies who are being unbelievably stupid and risky by ever broadcasting outward signals; and Carl Sagan's takeaway: “the newest children in a strange and uncertain cosmos should listen quietly for a long time, patiently learning about the universe and compa, ring notes, before shouting into an unknown jungle that we do not understand.”