Slashdot Mirror


Is Linux Taking Over The World? (networkworld.com)

"2019 just might be the Year of Linux -- the year in which Linux is fully recognized as the powerhouse it has become," writes Network World's "Unix dweeb." The fact is that most people today are using Linux without ever knowing it -- whether on their phones, online when using Google, Facebook, Twitter, GPS devices, and maybe even in their cars, or when using cloud storage for personal or business use. While the presence of Linux on all of these systems may go largely unnoticed by consumers, the role that Linux plays in this market is a sign of how critical it has become. Most IoT and embedded devices -- those small, limited functionality devices that require good security and a small footprint and fill so many niches in our technology-driven lives -- run some variety of Linux, and this isn't likely to change. Instead, we'll just be seeing more devices and a continued reliance on open source to drive them.

According to the Cloud Industry Forum, for the first time, businesses are spending more on cloud than on internal infrastructure. The cloud is taking over the role that data centers used to play, and it's largely Linux that's making the transition so advantageous. Even on Microsoft's Azure, the most popular operating system is Linux. In its first Voice of the Enterprise survey, 451 Research predicted that 60 percent of nearly 1,000 IT leaders surveyed plan to run the majority of their IT off premises by 2019. That equates to a lot of IT efforts relying on Linux. Gartner states that 80 percent of internally developed software is now either cloud-enabled or cloud-native.

The article also cites Linux's use in AI, data lakes, and in the Sierra supercomputer that monitors America's nuclear stockpile, concluding that "In its domination of IoT, cloud technology, supercomputing and AI, Linux is heading into 2019 with a lot of momentum."

And there's even a long list of upcoming Linux conferences...

243 comments

  1. As Madge would say, by SpzToid · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're soaking in it!

    https://www.google.com/search?....

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    1. Re: As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is totally right. Most people think they are using specific things from specific manufacturers and unless they see enough evidence to the contrary they really donâ(TM)t k ow otherwise - give everyone a break for cryin out loud - did we really not know that people are all unique and interesting and have lots of cultural nuances? Is there only one true human being?

    2. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The fact is that most people today are using Linux without ever knowing it -- whether on their phones, online when using Google, Facebook, Twitter, GPS devices, and maybe even in their cars,

      No. Just fucking no.

      When you do a search using Google, or post something to Facebook, that is not "using Linux".

      If you have a GPS unit in your car, that does not mean you are "using Linux".

      This is a level of stupid that is beyond Slashdot's normal level of stupid.

      Linux could very well be taking over the world, without us "using" it in the strict sense you mean -- that is, using it and knowing that you're using it.

      You and I are using numerous technologies to exchange these posts, without knowing what they all are.

    3. Re:As Madge would say, by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You are a fucking moron.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet they're right, the cell-app or GPS map UX is not "using Linux" tangibly in any real sense, which is much more of a pain in the ass to actually go about.

    5. Re:As Madge would say, by sjames · · Score: 1

      Linux is making it work, so unless you are using the device as a paper weight, you are (perhaps unknowingly) using Linux.

      You sound like a butthurt Microsoft Munchkin.

    6. Re:As Madge would say, by Sique · · Score: 1
      In the same sense you could claim that you don't "use Linux", if you are working on a desktop on you ubuntu system.

      A user never directly interacts with the operating system. That's what the shell is for. You are using a shell (yes, also a graphic user interface is a shell, albeit a much more complex one than a command line interface), and you could be totally agnostic to the underlying operating system. A shell is a special application that allows a user to request computing resources from the operating system.

      So either the computing resource you are using right now is administered by a Linux kernel, then you are using Linux. Or it is not. Then you are not using Linux. Just because the user interface doesn't look like bash or XWindow, it's still a shell around a Linux system.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet they're wrong. Words have meanings. I can do this all day.

    8. Re:As Madge would say, by jtgd · · Score: 1

      OK, fine. You are using a device based on Linux.

      --
      J
    9. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hugging. Please use Hugging.

    10. Re:As Madge would say, by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Hugging. Please use Hugging.

      No.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    11. Re: As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus is white. And male.

    12. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS using it, fuckstick.

      I know more about Linux than you could ever hope to achieve to, so I win, you lose.

    13. Re:As Madge would say, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down, Linus!

      Go back to your therapist or life coach or whoever helped you work out that bottled-up aggression.

  2. What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now? Lol. If anything, shitty IOT one-off landfill devices are taking over the world.

    1. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by sound+vision · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And most of them run Linux?
      While everyone was waiting on the Year of Linux on the Desktop... The desktop died, yet Linux lives on.

  3. I would say Linux.. by GrBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would say Linux is already basking in the glow of having outstanding server share. It's just the desktop experience that leaves alot to be desired.

    1. Re:I would say Linux.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 2019 won't be the year of Linux, because it's not growing anywhere. Sure, it's used in a lot of places, but there's nothing new about 2019.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:I would say Linux.. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'd say, and I'll get hate for this but fuck it reality can suck, deal with it, is that Linux is becoming corporate's bitch which I really wouldn't want to celebrate.

      I mean is there any point in celebrating a Linux kernel in a black box device that cannot even be updated, much less allow you to switch to another OS? I mean look at the list...phones, locked down with binary blobs and most are a bitch to even unlock these days and cannot be updated and many are being sold with security holes OOTB since the phone companies won't put out updates for their phones, GPS units, locked all to fuck, cars...notice a pattern here? So you got the kernel stuffed into a locked down corporate product...what is there to celebrate? How do you gain ANY type of advantage over that device running Windows or Apple iOS? Anyone? Beuller?

      So I'm sorry but I'm not seeing any advantages here, in fact if anything we are regressing to the bad old days of black box computing and nasty lock in where you have to toss and start over if you want to switch ecosystems. The only place a truly open Linux has left is the server space and that is being gobbled up by cloud services like AWS and Azure which can be as black box as they wanna be...where is the upside here? I mean seriously who gives a shit if your device has a Linux kernel if you can't do dick that the corp doesn't approve of?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    3. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Linux on the desktop is actually pretty amazing. I've put two non-technical (but not stupid, either) family members on Linux and haven't had a single problem report from them. It's just works. And neither has said "oh, I miss MacOS" or "I miss Windows".

    4. Re:I would say Linux.. by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'd say the desktop experience of many Linux distros already outshines the proprietary alternatives, even before you start delving into the far deeper options to fine-tune things to your own tastes.

      What's lacking is the software support for a lot of major "must have" applications. WINE solves much (most?) of that, but isn't always the most user-friendly software to set up, particularly for the sort of people that are most likely to need it.

      I'm eternally surprised that so few desktop-oriented distros ship with a really dialed-in copy of WINE as a default package, (perhaps opt-out during install for the sake of purists). You want to lure new users, make it so that they can easily run their "must-have" software until they learn better. *They* may not know or care about the details, but I'd be a lot more enthusiastic about convincing people to give it a shot if I could honestly say it would run at least most of their existing software out of the box, without appalling font rendering and the many other quirks WINE often displays without a lot of fine-tuning.

      This is a bit out of left field, but speaking of font rendering, has anyone else noticed glitches in Firefox text boxes in the last year? I'll be typing, and suddenly it's like the entire text box suddenly pops back into sharp focus when I hadn't even noticed it had gone blurry. Haven't seen that in any other program, and it happens across all the sites I type at.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same experience for me. My elderly pop (83) uses it just fine - for pretty high-end photography post processing. He switched from Mac about 10 years ago.

    6. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. What software applications is he using?

    7. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The desktop experience has been the best for me and is why I don't use other OSes. Not having annoying update processes, having preferences reset, annoying defaults, poor choice of default apps, GUI that changes with major OS revisions, there are tons of annoyances you can avoid with Linux

    8. Re: I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must embrace profits, or go hug off and sleep alone.

    9. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say Linux is already basking in the glow of having outstanding server share. It's just the desktop experience that leaves alot to be desired.

      Thanks to Red Hat's embracing of Gnome and Gnome being a crap DE that insists on copying the lack of features from McOS.

    10. Re:I would say Linux.. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      It's the exact case with some family members here too: God loves XFCE!

    11. Re:I would say Linux.. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      What's lacking is the software support for a lot of major "must have" applications. WINE solves much (most?) of that, but isn't always the most user-friendly software to set up, particularly for the sort of people that are most likely to need it.

      I don't think so: almost all "pro-software" is linux compatible (native or through WINE, like you sad), what make GNU/Linux stills lags behind on the Desktop are games (very much AAA titles stills DirectX-only, or it's a mess to work via WINE [when software updates crashes functions...]), what makes "tech-savy" people (most of family technical support) still use (and spread) Windoze...

    12. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since 2007, I've used Linux on the desktop, and I've also put family members (the ones who rely on me to sort out their computers) on Linux. Same report: no problem, it just works, all good.

      But, when I say "it just works", well, it does, but I still have to show some of my family how to do certain things (get their photos or Fitbit data onto their machine). What I wish is that companies who actually rely so heavily on Linux to do most of their back end work, would put at least as much into their front end work. For instance, I thought Viber was cool (I still do), but my family and I only now use it on our phones because their Linux desktop version (at least the .DEB version) is so out of date it won't install on LTS Ubuntu without lots of work.

    13. Re:I would say Linux.. by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Few things I hate worse than a company that ships a Linux-enabled product (the Gnu copyright buried in the back of the manual is a usual clue) but is only provided with Windows, and maybe Mac, software. What did they do, lay off the Linux guy as soon as they got the kernel booted up? Of course, the real reason is that the desktop software is mostly just an ad-injection platform anyway, so it's better to just toss it and use the reverse-engineered tool you downloaded from github in any case.

    14. Re:I would say Linux.. by ras · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My wife, a complete computer neophyte, asked me to put Linux on her laptop a few weeks ago. Well, she didn't use those exact works. She actually said, "can you do to my laptop whatever you did to our daughters laptop to make it run fast".

      She really didn't have a lot of choice. The laptop she was referring to was a one of those $400 Windows touch screen laptops with a 32GB SSD. HP, Dell, Leveno and others make them and all have a very similar design - so similar it must have come from one source. My guess is this was a "tablet killer" design from Microsoft. Which is kinda sad, because the hardware is fine for the price. What wrecked it (literally) was Windows 10. Turns out 32GB is not enough space for Windows 10 to do it's upgrades, so eventually Microsoft's patches cause the the machine to run out of disk space and kills itself. Windows 10 is also god-awfully slow on such low end hardware - it can take 15 seconds to response to a click on the Start button.

      A stock Debian install with LXDE on the other hand occupies 4GB of the 32GB SSD, and responds to a click on the start button instantaneously, every time. That 4GB includes all the crap people usually use on a desktop, like PDF viewer, picture viewer, browser, email client, and something that Windows doesn't come with - Libre Office. It doesn't suffer from flaky WiFi (apparently a Windows driver problem), and the mouse and touch screen worked out of the box. The touch pad was glitchy out of the box on Windows - it needed an updated touch pad driver.

      No questions were asked after the transition. I guess a decade or so ago, the different place for the shutdown button or the different styling would have been jarring. But Microsoft fixed that issue for us by re-arranging everything from XP to Vista to Windows 10. LXDE manages to be closer to the familiar XP interface than Windows 10 is, so it was actually a return to more familiar territory.

      To me it looks to be over. Linux has been faster (by no small margin), smaller, more reliable and has a better chance of "just working" on more platforms than Windows for some time now. The issue was all those proprietary .exe programs people used. But Google solved problem for us when they won the battle to move applications from the desktop to the cloud. To wit: my wife uses this laptop when she is away from her desktop to run her book keeping business. Not so long ago that would have required you to run a Windows only MYOB or something similar. She uses several accounting packages now - all are software as a service running in a web browser.

      It's a bit difficult to predict what will eventually happen to the desktop. Everyone running a traditional Linux+GNU free distribution seems unlikely. But Windows still being around seems even less likely. It's being displaced on all fronts - on the server even Azure runs more Linux than windows, Linux is already the dominant "User" OS - more people use Android than anything else, and in the embedded space Windows CE has already been driven to extinction. It turns of if you do build a better mouse trap the people will come - if you have the stamina to wait long enough.

    15. Re:I would say Linux.. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are multiple Linux distros these days that are easy to use, and even easy to set up. That's not the problem anymore.

      The difficulty with Linux on the desktop at this point is just 3rd party support. Hardware vendors don't prioritize Linux drivers. Software developers aren't prioritizing Linux ports. If you're only running hardware with Linux support, and you're only running web applications and/or native Linux apps, then Linux makes for a great desktop.

      Also it means you don't really have to deal with Microsoft ramming advertising down your throat, forcing you to use Cortana, or doing forced updates.

    16. Re:I would say Linux.. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, "through WINE" only counts if it's reliable. And WINE working properly out of the box is NOT reliable. Especially for pro software, where proper font rendering is a generally a must-have feature. The eye- and brain-strain of reading badly rendered text for several hours a day just can't be reasonably justified. And then there's all the stuff that just won't run on WINE - Autodesk's Fusion 360 is my current bugaboo.

      Games are admittedly a particular problem as well - but most of those actually run fine under WINE as well, though sometimes with a serious performance loss, which is generally only relevant to serious gamers - a small part of the population. And Steam actually seems to be putting some serious effort in on that front. ( at least I presume they're using WINE under the hood)

      It seems to me that first-class WINE support under the major distros would go a long way to solving the market share problem with Linux. Software doesn't support Linux natively, because the potential customer base isn't there to justify the effort of porting to a whole new OS. Partially that's down to a small user base, and partially it's down to the user base largely preferring Free software, and partially it's probably down to simple "brand awareness". The MacOS user base is probably somewhere between twice and half the size of the desktop Linux user base, but generally has much broader software support.

      We're already at the point where competent Linux users willing to put in the effort to tweak WINE into working properly can run most Windows software without problems. If we expanded that to *most* Linux users, most especially newbies just testing the waters, it would drastically lower the bar for people looking to switch - that gets the user base growing faster, which increases the value of supporting it to software developers. And since that could just mean making sure the existing Windows version runs properly on WINE as well, the expected cost-benefit proposition would likely look a lot more attractive than MacOS.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    17. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She really didn't have a lot of choice. The laptop she was referring to was a one of those $400 Windows touch screen laptops with a 32GB SSD. HP, Dell, Leveno and others make them and all have a very similar design - so similar it must have come from one source. My guess is this was a "tablet killer" design from Microsoft. Which is kinda sad, because the hardware is fine for the price. What wrecked it (literally) was Windows 10. Turns out 32GB is not enough space for Windows 10 to do it's upgrades, so eventually Microsoft's patches cause the the machine to run out of disk space and kills itself. Windows 10 is also god-awfully slow on such low end hardware - it can take 15 seconds to response to a click on the Start button.

      I have a similar story regarding Windows 10. A faculty member very recently brought me his Microsoft Surface which was having trouble. It had run out of drive space and the 1803 feature update was failing. However, it kept trying and had filled all available drive space rendering the machine useless to a newbie. This junk pile had 128GB of SSD yet it still wasn't enough for Office 2016, MATLAB 2017A, Visual Studio 2015 (required for MATLAB) and Windows to coexist. He could no longer save his files.

      I cleared as much crap (temp files, restore points, shadow files, etc.) as I could and had to tell him he would have to uninstall something and spend a day or so running Windows Updates, cleaning up the old Windows install files and reinstalling his software.

    18. Re: I would say Linux.. by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      I second that: "native support" is much more important than "works in WINE": appears to me that it's only matter of "user base"/"market share" now (WINE already did it's work :P)

    19. Re: I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats all this "pro" shit? If you're a pro, you'll use the right tools for the job. If that job requires running Windows applications, then as a pro you'll run them in Windows. Thats what pros do. Thats part of what makes you a pro. Playing video games is not part of "professionalism". And even if you are playing video games as a profession, guess what you're using, thats right, Windows.

    20. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People often overlook the vast legions of embedded devices, of which Android is only one.

    21. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 is also god-awfully slow on such low end hardware - it can take 15 seconds to response to a click on the Start button.

      Just wanted to say that I've experienced this on a couple of my Windows Server 2016 boxes, both of which are running on high-end, high-spec hardware. Sometimes when I click on the start button it takes up to ten seconds for the menu to appear. So, I don't think it's exclusively something to do with low-end hardware, must be another Windows "feature".

    22. Re:I would say Linux.. by dasmoscas · · Score: 0

      By experience, since late 90s, desktop linux is a pain in the ass. When I was young it was fun to workaround errors and annoyances to finally set up the desktop and kernel the way I want. Was fun and gave a "sense of accomplishment". Nowadays it is so frustrating using it(not just the kernel, desktop). Programs crash, most are difficult to setup/personalize. Constant annoyances and errors in what was supposed to be just normal user interaction. If I want to have fun I will install linux for the pleasure of doing it, messing with config files etc but for work or actually use? No way, gave up because of frustration and waste of time. Windows, on the other hand, is now beautiful, stable as fuck(I use windows since 3.1) and does the things that it is supposed to do!(idc about it phoning home). So, I use windows to work and at home, Lubuntu is my media player and linux for servers in general. The black box idea is not cool, though.

    23. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That all sounds nice but if you use your computer to play popular games you're dead in the water with Linux for most of them. Yes Wine might work for a few here and there but it's just not a real option.

    24. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows CE has already been driven to extinction

      I wish. My whole province's transit systems are using that for a "tap-on" fare system. Half the time where I live they're broken and costing the system millions. A few times they were so borked that I saw a tiny desktop with icons and the Windows CE default background, that's how I know this.

    25. Re:I would say Linux.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://github.com/ValveSoftware/Proton/
      https://steamdb.info/app/891390/history/?changeid=5187653
      https://www.protondb.com/

      Shut up, idiot.

  4. No by Vanyle · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No

    1. Re:No by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Linux laptop exists with power management on par with Windows. The basic kernel and userland are fine; it's just that there is no hardware support to speak of. (Sure, it "runs", but it is mostly a battery burner. )

      Millions of Chromebook users would beg to differ.

    2. Re: No by zekica · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My laptop with skylake i5 runs 10 hours on battery with ubuntu 18.04 consumsles about 5-6 watts on idle and 6-8 watts when browsing... Windows consumes about 5 watts on idle so I don't see a difference.

    3. Re: No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No and now that we all know it's been for the benefit of IBM and Microsoft, the free (as in the corps didn't pay for it) code is coming to an end. That's just the way it is and the way it's going to be. Heil Hitlary!

    4. Re:No by Immerman · · Score: 1

      That would be one of those special cases where the laptop actually ships with Linux, and thus the manufacturer makes sure there is proper hardware support for the hardware they install in order to met their marketing targets. Put Linux on a laptop not designed for it (a.k.a. most of them) and things aren't quite so rosy.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:No by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Doesn't your argument apply equally to WIndows systems? They work smoothly only because the manufacturer created the proper Windows drivers for their hardware. It's the same "special case".

    6. Re:No by kevmeister · · Score: 1

      It's not Linux, but my laptop has run FreeBSD for six years with no significant battery issues. Battery life is not as good as is claimed by Lenovo, but it's not at all bad and the only thing that does not work is the fingerprint reader. Graphics acceleration works well as does the crypto chip. I get excellent performance playing video from an encrypted partition. Not even close to running out of CPU.

      I would not recommend it for gaming, but I would not if running Windows, either. My only real issue is lack of software support or an adequate replacement for Quicken.

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    7. Re:No by Immerman · · Score: 1

      In theory it absolutely is the same. In practice the market share difference means it's a whole lot easier finding a laptop without decent Linux drivers than without decent Windows drivers

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  5. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux laptop exists with power management on par with Windows. The basic kernel and userland are fine; it's just that there is no hardware support to speak of. (Sure, it "runs", but it is mostly a battery burner. )

  6. It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Linux destroyed UNIX, BSD, and Windows Server many years ago.

    We want Year of Linux on the Desktop!!! And that's still not happening anytime soon...

    1. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And YoL will never happen on the desktop as long as Linux on the desktop is a fragmented mess. Desktop Linux is not an OS, it's a group of closely related OSs flying in loose formation, with some truly painful (for users and developers) differences.

    2. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux destroyed UNIX, BSD, and Windows Server many years ago.
      We want Year of Linux on the Desktop!!! And that's still not happening anytime soon...

      That's because the desktop is owned by UNIX + BSD (MacOS) and Windows.

    3. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is preventing You from installing Linux on Your desktop ?

    4. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a regular user the shitty experience maybe?

    5. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is such complete horseshit. It might have been marginally true 15 or 20 years ago, but in 2018 a common scenario might include an Android phone, an iPad, and a Windows laptop. People know how to interact with computing devices now, know how to navigate GUIs now, and don't freak out over trivial differences in the appearances or exact names of icons any more.

    6. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that Linux is absolute shit. It’s shit on the server too.

    7. Re: It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that you as a (presumed) microserf would know anything about *ahem* shit, being completely anal retentive.

    8. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The fact that installing Linux is often a PITA. Dual-boot and have Windows fsck up your boot-loader? Figure out this UEFI stuff? Ugh! Not to mention hardware that's crap under Linux.

      Now if you get a box that actually works well with Linux, or better still comes with it pre-installed, that's an entirely different experience.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    9. Re:It's never been about Year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux destroyed UNIX, BSD, and Windows Server many years ago."

      What planet do you people live on?? Unix, yes, Linux destroyed that. BSD was never particularly popular and still retains a niche following, nowadays enhanced by systemd refugees, people who hate Gnome, Canonical, or whatnot about Linux.

      But Windows Server? Really? Here's a datapoint for you, not based upon BS wishful thinking. My organization has ~4,500 Windows Servers, and maybe, maybe, 30 combined Unix and Linux servers. I don't consider my company to be particularly special or unusual in this, in any way.

      Linux-heads have been predicting the death of both Microsoft and Windows. For decades. Maybe quit with the wishful thinking and learn to co-exist; you look like fools and harping nards the longer you keep up with this stuff. Linux is a success but you wouldn't know it from the unsuccessful predictions of world domination.

  7. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hesitate to give them the full "Linux" designation if they're not actually full OSS, upgradeable, patchable, moderate-sec devices. "Backdoored *nix bricks" might be more accurate.

  8. More than phones, billions of them already though by bobstreo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't forget all the SOHO wireless routers, NAS storage devices, probably TVs, DVRs, and a whole pile of other home appliances.

    The one place Linux has been way behind is on the Desktop/Laptop,

      Microsoft has been fighting tooth and nail to keep Linux Desktop at bay. Giving away millions of free copies of Windows 10 was part of this strategy.

    This is being typed on a battered old laptop running Xubuntu with xfce. I think I booted Vista on once to check if it supported manual fan controls. It's probably 7 years old and works fine for me (I am not a gamer on PC systems)

  9. Linux hasn't taken over the world by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's greedy megacorps like Google, Facebook and whatnot that have taken over Linux as a commodity OS they have complete access to the source code of, and don't have to pay a cent in royalties to deploy by the hundreds of millions of seats.

    What's taken over the world is those companies' disgusting and heinous application stacks that happen to run on Linux.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While I don't like SaaS/IaaS very much -particularly when it's hooked into insular solutions with their own incompatible API/ABI and so on-, it is hard to deny that most of the big companies DID provide a good number of worthwhile contributions to open source. Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, Alibaba [...] all published fairly interesting pieces of software.

      I feel the situation is overall MUCH better than it used to be in the past.

    2. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by grumbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I feel the situation is overall MUCH better than it used to be in the past.

      In the past we had PCs on which you could install an OS of your choice, the hardware was well supported, mostly open and standardized. Now we have phones and tablets which have essentially zero freedom, either they are fully locked down or your are stuck with a single unmaintained outdated Kernel. This is honestly even worse than Windows, as at least with Windows you had the option to upgrade if Microsoft released a new version. With phones however there is no official AndroidOS release from Google that you can install on your phone, you have to use whatever hackjob the hardware manufacturer provided you with, which won't get any updates a few month after the release.

      And of course it doesn't stop with hardware, all the software these days forces you into the cloud. Again, worse than the proprietary software in the past, that at least run and your machine and could be cracked, hacked and reverse engineered. Can't really do that with the cloud.

      Computing today has pretty much turned into a nightmare, one that you can't really escape from, as most of the proprietary services and hardware do not even have a practical open alternative.

      That the companies release some code as Open Source doesn't really help much, as it's never the code that actually matters.

    3. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choose your phone wisely, meaning pick one that supports LineageOS and you can install that 3rd party ROM and get updates as frequently as every day if you so choose to update it every day.

    4. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by bug1 · · Score: 2

      We forged the chains that are now used to enslave us :(

    5. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Even with LineageOS you'd still be running an outdated kernel and having to use binary blobs, and it all has to be hacked together for the specific phone. This is quite different from a PC where you can just take a Debian release, run a mainline kernel and it will work on pretty much all the PCs.

    6. Re:Linux hasn't taken over the world by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      What's taken over the world is those companies' disgusting and heinous application stacks that happen to run on Linux.

      Actually, beyond embedded Linux devices, the main stack used is Android. Android provides a nice UI framework, is available for practically for every SoC out there and if you device has a display, it's almost guaranteed to what is running underneath it all.

      It's also very cheap to find an Android app developer to develop your frontend UI. Much easier than trying to find a develop for the piles of custom UI frameworks that existed before (even QT).

      Of course, you can't take Android and have it do what you want, you need to customize it to support your hardware and expose the hooks necessary for your app developers to implement the device functionality. Those are left to more expensive Android Platform developers, who work with the OS itself and customize it. (There are there "development" streams in Android - SDK, NDK and PDK. The SDK and NDK are what app developers use, while the PDK (Platform development kit) is what is used to customize the OS to do things beyond what it was meant to do. It usually results in a flurry of patches above the AOSP base code)

  10. Corproation, not software by bug1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corporations who use FOSS are taking over the world

    FOSS provides the means for them to concentrate their power by making them more independent of other greedy software corporations who used to fight them for it.

    FOSS assists in a concentration of power by select corporations.

    Not the way i hoped it would work out.

    1. Re: Corproation, not software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It might not be what you would have hoped but I'd argue we are better off this way than paying Microsoft for every device and web app seat we touch. In 2018 they are the only company that still charges for a consumer grade os. They could have taken over servers, mainframes, mobile phones, automotive, and embedded. They've had products in all these spaces.

    2. Re:Corproation, not software by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      FOSS assists in a concentration of power by select corporations.

      Not the way i hoped it would work out.

      What were you expecting, that the people who can barely use their computers and the FOSS operating systems or applications that run on them would somehow be able to modify the code and contribute back? It doesn't matter whether FOSS exists or not, because you're always going to see that outcome as long as you allow competition in a market. The most able competitors will eliminate those that are ineffective.

    3. Re:Corproation, not software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahoy retarded motherfucker!

      Then get off your ass and make it work out for yourself.

      Once again someone expected everyone else to come to some kind of altruistic solution so they left it up to others then pissed and moaned when it didn't work out that way. Put in the effort or get your ass handed to you, that's life's greatest axiom.

    4. Re:Corproation, not software by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I think you misspelled "coproration", which refers to pieces of excrement handed out to the poor unsuspecting masses. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Corproation, not software by Solandri · · Score: 1

      There's nothing stopping FOSS from releasing the same products as the corporations are. The corporations are just better than FOSS advocates at figuring out and giving users what they want.

      That's always been the problem with FOSS, as far back as the 1990s when I first began using it. FOSS advocates have this preconceived notion of what the software they write should be. And users who tell them that's not what they need get told "if that's what you want, then you write it." If you're not a programmer, you're excluded from guiding the direction of FOSS.. Whereas corporations run usability tests and product trials specifically to let non-programmers tell them which direction they should go.

      This is where Stallman messed up IMHO. Profit is a motivator by which users can influence programmers (they'll pay you more if you add a feature they want). FOSS would work if profit were removed and replaced with some other way for users to influence programmers. But Stallman just removed profit and called it a day, believing everything else would take care of itself. FOSS works fine between programmers, which is why so many programmers at corporations use it and contribute to it for behind-the-scenes software. But users vastly outnumber programmers, and if they don't have a voice in the direction your software should go, then any user-facing FOSS software like Desktop Linux is rudderless.

  11. As /.'s former poster child for Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    As /.'s former poster child for Windows - I like Linux & KDE latest/greatest + dev tool FreePascal + Lazarus IDE, does all I need.

    * Do I think Linux makes a GOOD DESKTOP OS too? You bet (posted from KUbuntu 18.04 LTS fully patched).

    APK

    P.S.=> It's inevitable free wins over pay-for ANYTHING once it plays enough "catchup ball" (which Linux & it's surrounding DESKTOP apps imo, for the most part, have)... apk

    1. Re: As /.'s former poster child for Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop pretending to like Linux, since you're someone who uses the term "OpenSORES" to mock open source software. You openly ridicule open source software and blame vulnerabilities on software being open source, saying it is a "double-edged sword". If you think open source is so inherently vulnerable, please go back to Windows, and take your junk software with you.

      As for saying you're going to create a screensaver, you'll be lucky to get 1 fps, as bad of a programmer as you are. Your junk software on Windows took 11 minutes to process 1.8 entries, or about 4 million processor cycles per entry. Your software is horribly inefficient because you're a terrible coder.

      Perhaps the only reason people should trust your code doesn't do anything malicious is that you're far too inept to create effective malware. Your software sucks, and you don't know a damn thing about security.

    2. Re: As /.'s former poster child for Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mistake, APK, here's the correct link to your idiotic comment about "OpenSORES" software.

  12. It's always next year. by w0mprat · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been reading Slashdot for 20 years and the year of the Linux desktop has always been at at hand.

    It's finally been shortened to "the year of Linux" to finally admit desktop Linux will never happen and to reshape the claim to fit the reality for once.

    But the year of linux isn't really here. The populace aren't really using Linux are they? Most experience of Linux is Android, or a cloud service, somewhere buried under a stack of abstraction is linux, and that in many cases could be replaced by a new OS without the user even noticing. Examples Fuschia (Google), Tizen (Samsung).

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:It's always next year. by mspohr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's interesting that ChromeOS has taken over the K-12 education market (58%), is predominant in the consumer market and is forecast to spread to commercial markets:
      Chromebooks are forecast to mark its presence in numerous application and service sectors such as banking, hotel industry, financial services and estate agents. In addition, features offered by this device such as collaboration and sharing of content are expected to impact the industry demand. These are economical devices that can offer better working platform for SMBs (small and medium scale businesses) as well as to the start-up companies which are not willing to make high investments for IT infrastructure.

      So, Linux on the desktop could arrive in the form of ChromeOS within a few years.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:It's always next year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Widespread adoption of Linux is a function of the utility of Linux. A lot of FOSS fanatics are sold on the freedom ideology and would use a buggy, non-functional mess to get their computing Nirvana. Well, that's not where mass market success lives.

      OK, but Linux isn't buggy and non-functional,right?

      Right, but this means that FOSS fans often harp on the freedom angle, when users don't care about that. Users also don't care about "MS is Evil". Some do want free (as in beer) software.

      Mostly though, FOSS fans are selling virtues that users don't care about.

  13. Linux is on the brink of becoming insignificant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is working on replacing the Linux kernel: Fuchsia uses the "Magenta" kernel. Linux on the desktop is missing its wide open opportunity. Microsoft has been fumbling its desktop OS for years, but the Linux desktop has not been able to capitalize on it and Microsoft will close this opportunity eventually. There is significant pressure on router and IoT manufacturers to prevent flashing of devices with Open Source firmwares. This is a blow to another mainstream market in which the Linux kernel has a foothold. Linux still dominates in high performance computing, but with potentially waning CPU manufacturer support, this to will be drawn into question.

  14. Linux Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may never be the "year of the linux desktop", but it has been the decade or more of:

    the linux server
    the linux powered phone
    the linux powered appliance
    the linux powered IoT device
    the linux powered router
    the linux powered storage device
    the linux powered chromebook

    linux is everywhere, where it matters.

    HP-UX : Dead
    SunOS : Dead
    Microsoft Servers : As good as Dead
    SparcOS : Dead
    Windows: Still a dominant player in the GUI space, for web-browsing, and communicating with Linux Servers

    All a desktop nowadays is, is a way to interact with linux backend applications. Nobody cares about the desktop, since it's a glorified web interface.

  15. Cloud blah blah blah by Nkwe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the summary:

    The cloud is taking over the role that data centers used to play

    The cloud *is* a data center, it is just someone else's data center. It is important not to forget that. There is nothing wrong with doing your computing in someone else's data center as long as you have analyzed the the risks (and possible rewards) of doing so. That being said, a lot of folks seem to associate some magic value because of the term "the cloud"; doing so without understanding what it is, is risky.

    1. Re:Cloud blah blah blah by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      So in this sense they cloud technology symbolizes "heaven".

      My thoughts exactly (see sig) :D

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Cloud blah blah blah by nine-times · · Score: 1

      If you read the statement as saying, "The cloud is taking over the role that data centers used to play" as "the role that a business's internal datacenter used to play is being taken over by the cloud," then it's not wrong.

      I think that's what's intended, given the context. The statement is preceded by, "businesses are spending more on cloud than on internal infrastructure." It also makes sense given the argument being made. It used to be that, even if you hosted your servers in someone else's infrastructure, you had to operate and maintain those servers. Part of the reason people use Windows servers is because it's easier to find someone who can adequately admin a Windows server than to find competent Linux sysadmins. However, in the "cloud" model, even though the servers are hosted in someone's datacenter somewhere, you don't have to worry about finding a competent Linux sysadmin. That's the developer's problem, and the developers have increased incentive to use Linux because they're operating in bulk and Windows is expensive.

  16. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by jd · · Score: 1

    Linux is the kernel. For OSS, you want GNU or BSD userspace over a Linux kernelspace, GNU/Linux and BSD/Linux respectively.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From TFS: "...businesses are spending more on cloud than on internal infrastructure."

    I call Bullshit.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFS: "...businesses are spending more on cloud than on internal infrastructure."

      I call Bullshit.

      I think the summary has that right. Do you not realize how much those AWS bills can come to?
      I work at a datacenter, and we have quite a few higher profile customers spending tens of thousands a month on our stuff alone, to say nothing of what they likely have elsewhere. There is no way most of them have much of any internal infrastructure beyond an office building and a few workstations. Even their dev servers are usually with us.

  18. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    Linux is a kernel. They run that kernel, and so they are Linux. You are talking about Gnu.

  19. Yeah by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Linux kernel surely takes over the world however Linux is nowhere to be seen on the desktop where it matters most.

    There's there's this still little known fact that Google wants to replace the Linux kernel with their own one. So, Android is not particularly bound to Linux since the kernel part of Android is anyone's to take.

    What about supercomputers? They are great, right, except they are basically huge calculators, so it's not like a huge win in my book. Besides, *BSD could have been used there as well.

    Then there's this fact that application/web servers only use Linux'es CPU/storage/networking capabilities and almost nothing else and then you'll get a pretty bleak picture of Linux dominance.

    1. Re:Yeah by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      What about supercomputers? They are great, right, except they are basically huge calculators, so it's not like a huge win in my book. Besides, *BSD could have been used there as well.

      All computers are basically huge calculators. Supercomputers set a great example of Linux dominance, because you really want to use all of that expensive hardware for your calculations, instead of it being dragged down by an idiotic OS and spyware. (Linux has much better hardware support than the BSDs, so it's an obvious choice for people who need to make the most of their hardware. I guess the BSDs have a more natural niche at the security conscious servers.)

      Traditionally, mobile computing was severely limited by hardware, so Linux was a similarly sensible choice for making the most of it. However, today's phones are looking more and more like corporate desktop machines where you can waste gigs of memory and a handful of CPU cores for shuffling a little text and images around. In both cases there's a similar rationale for the excess: using hardware as a status symbol. Linux is cheap and efficient, but many people buy an Apple just to show that they can afford an Apple.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Yeah by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      where it matters most

      [Citation needed]

      As much as Linux on Desktops would be a good thing:
      a) desktops are dying
      b) the backend and all intermittent transit for your data is orders of magnitude more important.

    3. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where it matters most

      [Citation needed]

      As much as Linux on Desktops would be a good thing:
      a) desktops are dying
      b) the backend and all intermittent transit for your data is orders of magnitude more important.

      Some people won't accept Linux as dominant until it has displaced Windows on their own laptop.
      But instead, a funny thing happened and Linux managed to dominate without doing that.

    4. Re:Yeah by Pieczatki · · Score: 1

      The Linux kernel surely takes over the world however Linux is nowhere to be seen on the pieczatki online where it matters most.

      There's there's this still little known fact that Google wants to replace the Linux kernel with their own one. So, Android is not particularly bound to Linux since the kernel part of Android is anyone's to take.

      What about supercomputers? They are great, right, except they are basically huge calculators, so it's not like a huge win in my book. Besides, *BSD could have been used there as well.

      Then there's this fact that application/web servers only use Linux'es CPU/storage/networking capabilities and almost nothing else and then you'll get a pretty bleak picture of Linux dominance.

      God point!

      --
      Pieczatki online na https://e-pieczatki24.pl
  20. Actually, it's capitalism discovering socialism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your biggest megacorps realized, that teamwork is better than a free-for-all.

    Because the ideal state of capitalism and socialism, is actually the same state.

    Of course they're still psychopaths. So they think they can get the benefits from teamwork, without having to contribute themselves. That's what profit is, after all: The part that you take without giving back.

    I doubt that will work forever, though.
    They need custom things. And they are dependent on the community too.
    Sooner or later, some will contribute, and gain advantages from it, because their contributions give them an advantage. Then everyone will follow or die, as those are the rules of capitalism.

  21. the narcissists have taken over the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the way i hoped it would work out.

    your way would have ended in global destruction

  22. Chavez is that you ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We heard you were dead

  23. F/OSS guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporations who use FOSS are taking over the world

    FOSS provides the means for them to concentrate their power by making them more independent of other greedy software corporations who used to fight them for it.

    FOSS assists in a concentration of power by select corporations.

    Not the way i hoped it would work out.

    What the Hell did you people expect? That they'd all chip in, release their code, and we'd all live in a F/OSS utopia with RMS as our patron Saint, leader and moral compass?

    The cynics called this in the 90s. Corporations as organization go straight to the bottom when it comes to morals and will exploit everything and anything for the bottom line - at least in the USA where "maximizing shareholder value" is the excuse and rationalization for being horrible corporate citizens.

    1. Re:F/OSS guys. by james_gnz · · Score: 1

      What the Hell did you people expect? ... Corporations as organization go straight to the bottom when it comes to morals and will exploit everything and anything for the bottom line ...

      That's not what was unexpected. The GPL was intended to deal with this, in the context of desktop software. What was unexpected was the shift from "the desktop" to "the cloud", which the GPL was not designed for.

    2. Re:F/OSS guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Affero General Public License
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License

      POSIT - So.. how much bad if Linus licensed Linux under AGPL?

    3. Re:F/OSS guys. by bug1 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and there is the AGPL as mentioned which tries to extend copyleft, however it has failed in part because there was already too much money and power benefiting from the status quo, and those community leaders who could have made a difference didnt support it, even SFC want it to be watered down and made into a Lesser APGL.

      What would have made a difference is a collective licensing organisation that had the power to change entire projects future work and adapt to new threats. There where attempts to move in that direction, but again they where shouted down by those with power and influence.

      FOSS was started and controlled by hobbyists, they have almost no influence today, it has become a means of control as bad as proprietary ever was.

      At the heart of the failure is the open source definition, and the FSF basic freedoms, which demands FOSS software has to be able to used for any purpose, even to do harm to movement itself.

    4. Re: F/OSS guys. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AGPL isn't enough, that just means they have to provide the source, what they already do in many cases. The real issue these days is control over the data. No amount of source code will free you from Facebook, YouTube or Google.

  24. Desktop Apps by 15Bit · · Score: 2

    If some of the companies developing for Win 10 and MacOS were to start releasing Linux ports too, the era of the Linux Desktop would come a lot sooner.

    Facing the inevitable switch from Win 7 to Win 10 in around a year, i've done an evaluation of my needs and in actual fact the only thing i need to leave MS behind is better photo editing support. I know there is GIMP, but a linux port of Affinity Photo would be a lot better for me (to use in conjunction with Darktable), along with Epson pulling their thumbs out their arse and writing linux drivers for their P600 / P800 family of photo printers.

    1. Re:Desktop Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never gonna happen. There are no customers who want to use expensive software AND deal with the headaches of Linux desktop. We have polled customers over the years. They do not want to switch. They may dislike W10, but it is familiar enough even with the bugs.

    2. Re:Desktop Apps by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      If some of the companies developing for Win 10 and MacOS were to start releasing Linux ports too, the era of the Linux Desktop would come a lot sooner. Facing the inevitable switch from Win 7 to Win 10 in around a year, i've done an evaluation of my needs and in actual fact the only thing i need to leave MS behind is better photo editing support. I know there is GIMP, but a linux port of Affinity Photo would be a lot better for me (to use in conjunction with Darktable), along with Epson pulling their thumbs out their arse and writing linux drivers for their P600 / P800 family of photo printers.

      I use gimp for any/all image manipulation, even when I am on Windows. It's not great for photo editing, but it's good enough and I found out that "good enough" works for me.

      My experience of users who point at a specific application as a reason for staying with Windows is that the majority of them first decide to stay with Windows and then look for a reason to do so. Functionality has nothing to do with it.

      The users who *are* stuck with Windows are usually power-users of one single application (be it photoshop, or some proprietary CAD app, a particular game, etc), but these users are by far the minority - the majority of photoshop users will find that gimp can do everything they used to do on photoshop, but they won't even look at it.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    3. Re: Desktop Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You polled them did ya?

      And do you happen to have a link to this pole?

    4. Re:Desktop Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make the jump. Life gets so much easier when everything works, no drivers to load, things don't change randomly when the OS updates, no spyware, no rent-seeking, no forced ads, no Edge, and the list goes on and on.

      For serious photo editing, have you looked at these options? (In no particular order. Some are more "managers" than pixel editors, some vice-versa.)

      - Fotoxx
      - Pixeluvo
      - Krita
      - Lightzone
      - Affinity under Wine? I got a recent version of Quicken to work under Wine for my Mother, for hug's sake!
      - Three-year-old versions of Photochop work under Wine too.

  25. Re:Actually, it's capitalism discovering socialism by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    Because the ideal state of capitalism and socialism, is actually the same state.

    What nonsense. An individual company might seek to become so powerful and all controlling that they essentially own everything, which would have a similar effect to the state removing private property, but that has nothing to do with the system itself. Without special treatment or protection from the government, it's quite unlikely that any single entity could ever reach that level of control.

  26. The desktop would KILL the Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's a joke because anyone who actually does computing work on his computer knows that the biggest advantage of Linux is exactly that it isn't a shitty desktop OS catering to what the dumbest and hence loudest consumers believe they want due to being told what to want by marketing and movie PHBs who print out the Internet.

    Look at systemd/Ubuntu/Gnome. It tries so hard to get to the consumer desktop, it kills everything that makes Unix-likes great in the process.
    The more you walk towards that goal that was carved out by the likes of Microsoft and Apple, the harder and more cumbersome it becomes, to actually do what is the whole point of having a computer: To automate your information processing work away!
    And when they try to add a productivity element, they go and pick the one thing that's bad about such systems! Like when they thought it would be great to offer a search/CLI type input to run easy commands... When not having oversight over what commands are currently available, since all you have is a prompt and a blinking cursor, is the one key flaw of traditional command-line interfaces!

    No. Linux is, and should always be, the OS for actually doing things.
    If you want a consumer desktop cripple OS, we already have too many of those. Just pick one of them, instead of ruining the one thing that's free from that cancer.

    1. Re:The desktop would KILL the Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The greatest thing about Linux is its flexibility. Don't like how GNOME works? Not a problem, use KDE, or XFCE, or LXDE, or Cinnamon, etc.

      Linux becoming the mainstream choice wouldn't change this, maybe the mainstream starts using SystemdDE, what's the problem? What would be stopping you from still using your favourite DE?

      At this point I don't think desktop Linux is happening, at least not any time soon, but there is no way it would kill what makes Linux great if it did, as that just isn't possible.

      N.B. Systemd isn't about the consumer desktop, but that is another discussion. Though to give you a hint, ask yourself who is the main company behind Systemd, and what they want.

  27. Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I'm a zealot, but I have 1 Windows virtual machine running Win7 Media Center. All the rest of the devices in the house run a Unix-like OS.

    2 raspberry Pi kodi machines - that's Linux
    1 Roku - BSD
    1 TiVo - Linux
    2 Android Tablets - Linux
    3 smartphones - Linux
    1 Nokia N800 - Linux
    2 Chromebooks - Linux
    4 physical desktop PCs - Linux as the hostOS
    1 SunOS machine as a curiosity.
    under those physical PCs are virtual machines, 15 VMs are Linux, 1 is BSD and 1 is that Win7 media center.

    We don't have any Alexa or Google-home or Nest personal home monitoring systems.

    Most homes will have an Amazon speaker (linux), some sort of streaming stick(s) (Linux), and 3-4 smart TVs running a BSD/Linux stack. 65% of the world uses Android phones, which is Linux.

    Pretty much every server you hit on the internet is running Linux, unless it is owned by Microsoft or about 50% of bank online websites. The other 90% run a Unix, probably a Linux, OS.

    In enterprises where I've worked, over 80% of our servers were Unix-based. We had about 10K Windows servers, so 40K were Unix/Linux. We didn't even use AD, preferring to use FreeIPA for enterprise authentication and directory management.

    Please realize that almost all popular operating systems are Unix-based except 1, MS-Windows. All the others that everyone in the world uses daily are Unix.

    Basically, I think you live in a different world than the rest of the world. But MSFT is definitely having a good quarter, thanks to their Linux support on Azure.

  28. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Yah, no. Linux kernel is a kernel. Debian Linux is a Linux distribution.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  29. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Linux was the kernel. That is, before it grew up to take over the world. Now Linux is considerably more than a kernel.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  30. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no "Debian Linux."

    "This operating system that we have created is called Debian."
    "Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel."
    "A large part of the basic tools that fill out the operating system come from the GNU project; hence the names: GNU/Linux, GNU/kFreeBSD, and GNU/Hurd."

    https://www.debian.org/intro/about

  31. Not until Apple kisses the ring by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Worldwide domination is not done until Apple kisses the ring or dies. Actually, it would not be particularly hard to port I-os and OS-x to Linux.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    1. Re:Not until Apple kisses the ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worldwide domination is not done until Apple kisses the ring or dies. Actually, it would not be particularly hard to port I-os and OS-x to Linux.

      Apple doesn't really matter in this area.
      In servers they don't exist.
      On desktops they don't exist.
      On laptops they are a minority.
      On phones they are a minority.
      They sell a lot of music though.
      Sorry.

  32. Can hybrid kernels be truly secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope some day they initialize parallel development of a Linux microkernel.

  33. Well... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    I think that depends on whether 2019 will be the year of the Linux desktop...

  34. No Longer Valid Question - It Has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course 2019 will be the year of Linux. It already rules:
    * The vast majority of phones runs on a Linux kernel. Yes, userspace above the kernel is mostly closed source, so it's not "pure," but the kernel is still important.
    * The vast majority of IoT, routers, web servers, "cloud" servers (yes, that's really just new, shiny timesharing of somebody else's computer really), etc. run on some flavor of Linux - at least the kernel.
    * It's hard to tell any more whether IBM mainframes run on Linux with legacy OS in a VM or whether Linux is running in a VM over a legacy OS.
    * Linux through a gaggle of distros has a rapidly growing (when you start from near zero, any increase is going to look great at first) desktop presence.

    It's almost easier to count the non-Linux OS with significant market share:
    * Windows desktop (all versions combined)
    * Windows Server (all versions combined)
    * Apple iOS
    * Apple Mac
    * BSD
    * Various country-specific OS done to avoid paying MS or others, or for special features; some probably are based on Linux if examined closely

    In terms of installed base (numbers of units), Linux (defined as the kernel, so driven mainly by the dominance of Google and Android) is so far ahead that everything else added together is a distant second. The only place that isn't ruled by Linux already is the desktop and corporate servers (Windows Server and mainframes still have a substantial presence). Despite some desultory attempts, Windows never got significantly into the phone and things markets, and has long since abandoned them. The only non-desktop, non-server market Windows is significant in is XBox, which is nowhere near the dominant force in the console market (think Sony, Nintendo). Otherwise, Linux.Rules.

  35. Linux is taking over my home by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    I've moved to doing all my development on Ubuntu (it's C based microcode and Java/C data processing modules which will be moved to WebAssembly). I've pushed my daughter who's at college to Ubuntu for her development systems and my wife and younger daughter to ChromeOS laptops. I still love my Macbook Air, however, as my personal/business laptop.

    We have two Windows 10 laptops that my wife and older daughter want to keep for security sake and I have a couple of Win 7 laptops and desktop for the same reasons. These get powered up once a month to update in a non-stressful manner in case they're ever needed.

    The biggest challenge for the family was going off Microsoft Office products (Outlook, Word, Excel and Powerpoint) and moving to the Google (and Apple) versions.

    1. Re:Linux is taking over my home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does your wife by any chance makes any courageous demands to be called names such as caitlyn?

    2. Re:Linux is taking over my home by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      my wife and younger daughter to ChromeOS laptops

      ChromeOS = Google malware.

      The biggest challenge for the family was going off Microsoft Office products (Outlook, Word, Excel and Powerpoint) and moving to the Google (and Apple) versions.

      Google office suite is also malware. All you've done is rearrange deck chairs on sinking ship.

    3. Re: Linux is taking over my home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. And to be perfectly honest, you are doing them a DISFAVOR.

  36. *BSD in the City of the Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went out to *BSD's grave on Decoration Day. The old forgotten cemetery is to be found adjacent to the dark woods beyond the edge of town. There within olfactory distance of the municipal treatment plant you will find *BSD's final resting place.

    *BSD's tombstone was shrouded by thick mosses and knots of noxious ivy. A mournful funerary crow sounded the requiem, as I gently pulled aside the tangled twists of thorns, and cleaned the decaying marker the best I could. A suffocating melancholia filled my heart, while I pondered that this indeed was *BSD's figurative charnel house of which so many have plaintively spoken.

    Nothing is so pitiful as an untended grave, a loved one now forgotten. The short sad life of this doomed and fated OS makes us realize that there but for the grace of God go all of us.

    I planted some wilting marigolds, found discarded in the waste heap behind the caretaker's shack, wishing that by some miracle these fleurs de mort might take root and bring a modicum of cheer to *BSD's God forsaken plot. My fervent hope is that the torpid colored boy, who so carelessly mows the grounds, doesn't slice them down, inadvertently mirroring *BSD's own doomed encounter with death's irresistible scythe.

    Funny how things work out. Linux, that brilliant nova stella, now runs the Internet and the world's fastest computers, while *BSD lies moldering within its forgotten crypt. Let the barren silence of *BSD's tomb be a mute reminder that hubris and braggadocio were no defense on that woeful day when the Angel of Death's bleak umbra was cast upon *BSD.

    1. Re:*BSD in the City of the Dead by shoor · · Score: 1

      I used to work with BSD 4.2 and 4.3 a lot back in the 1980s, and I have a CD of Dr Dobb's Journal's official 386 BSD Release 1.0 done by William and Lynne Jolitz. I never did anything but look at the source code for it as I was already in the linux camp. The big problem for me was lack of support for many devices with BSD. As I recall, there was one SCSI controller supported, and I didn't have it. My 1st linux was Slackware. It came on 50 diskettes and I was able to install it on my cheap, off-brand laptop. So yeah, that's how things went. I wanted to be a BSD guy, and tried out various flavors of NetBSD, FreeBSD and OpenBSD back in the late 90s early 00s, but linux always had more stuff. Those BSDs are still around aren't they? Particularly OpenBSD which has it's own dictator.

      Supposedly BSD still lives in the MacOS. But I don't know the details. I reckon there's a lot of caveats about that.

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
    2. Re: *BSD in the City of the Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we are better off without ya. Us BSD users will keep our strong dictators who at least stand for something.

      Stand for something or fall for anything.

  37. The Sierra supercomputer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article also cites Linux's use in AI, data lakes, and in the Sierra supercomputer that monitors America's nuclear stockpile, concluding that "In its domination of IoT, cloud technology, supercomputing and AI, Linux is heading into 2019 with a lot of momentum."

    Citing one supercomputer's use of Linux as evidence of its momentum is sort of silly. Actually, Linux' momentum regarding use in supercomputers has pretty much come to a stillstand. In the list of the 100 fastest supercomputers in the world it is used in 100. Does not leave a lot of room for momentum here.

    So what's special about the Sierra supercomputer?

  38. Jobs vs Gates. Epic Rap Battles of History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said...

  39. The penguins are comming the penguins are comming by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2

    Welcome my little friends, here is some fish.

    Really nice to see ongoing work on bringing windows compatibility, various graphics stacks and traditional X server replacements up to speed. Sooner Microsoft's Malware operating system dies the better off we'll all be.

    "Cloud Industry Forum, for the first time, businesses are spending more on cloud than on internal infrastructure. The cloud is taking over the role that data centers used to play"

    Translation to English:

    Rent a server industry forum, for the first time, business are spending more money renting other peoples servers than owning and operating their own. Rented servers is taking over the role that owning your own servers used to play.

    In its first Voice of the Enterprise survey, 451 Research predicted that 60 percent of nearly 1,000 IT leaders surveyed plan to run the majority of their IT off premises by 2019

    Translation to English:

    Server rental industry marketing hacks release survey showing favorable outlook. Be cool like everyone else and rent a server instead of buying your own.

    Gartner states that 80 percent of internally developed software is now either cloud-enabled or cloud-native.

    I tried to translate this to English but my translation software crashed.

  40. nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ian Betteridge is correct once again.

    Linux is not taking over the world. Its position in the market is very similar to Java, which touts "billions" of devices using it during the installation process on a PC. But nobody knows that Android uses it, that their Bluray players use it, that lots of other embedded systems use it (they don't know what the fuck that even means, either).

    With Linux, the same is be true: billions may be using it, but they don't fucking know it. They don't know that their phone or tablet or in-dash panel in their car uses it, they don't know that their Tivo uses it, that their Wifi probably relies upon it. They don't know that the web site or email or "app" they're using likely uses a Linux-based server. They don't know what the magic that is the 'internet' relies upon Linux in the switches and routers and servers that power it. They don't care, either. And because they don't know, and don't care, they aren't going to stroll into BestBuy or browse Amazon specifically looking for a Linux-based PC. Until that happens on a significant scale, Linux will not be 'taking over the world'.

  41. For all the "desktop" fanatics posting here... by GerryGilmore · · Score: 2

    You DO realize that the entire concept of "the desktop" has drastically changed from 10-20 years ago, right? Yeah, "the desktop" used to mean an x86-powered PC running Windows OS and an ecosystem of applications that could ONLY run on said Windows OS (or Mac equivalent). Today "the desktop" means pretty much everything from a tablet to a workstation that may or may not be able to run Windows apps, but does most of its work over a network and can run any web-based application that comprises the majority of apps today. Wintel-only "desktop" is a dinosaur that is dead, just too stupid to lay down.

    1. Re:For all the "desktop" fanatics posting here... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 0

      You DO realize that the entire concept of "the desktop" has drastically changed from 10-20 years ago, right?

      Nope, mine looks and works remarkably similar which is kind of a let down. Years ago tech gods were spending at least some time making shit better... today they are spending all their time trying to fuck you.

      Today "the desktop" means pretty much everything from a tablet to a workstation.

      Sorry I don't recognize that definition of desktop and don't know of anyone else who does. Nobody thinks tablet when "desktop" is invoked.

      but does most of its work over a network and can run any web-based application that comprises the majority of apps today. Wintel-only "desktop" is a dinosaur that is dead, just too stupid to lay down.

      The only difference between now and 20 years ago is most of the time when normal people sat in front of their computer it was to click the 'AOL' or Internet dialer.

      For a huge number of users email / communications / Internet was always the point of owning a computer. Nothing substantive has changed.

  42. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1
    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  43. You seem to confuse socialism and communism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not how socialism works. Hell, that's not even proper communism! Sounds like it got tainted by what you call libertarianism.

    American "education", 'eh?

  44. Re:Actually, it's capitalism discovering socialism by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Not *a* company, but a handful of them. Just like in a dictatorship, power is not held by *a* person, but by a cabal. Kim Jong Un wants to really change how things are run, he'd better have most of the most powerful members of his cabal on board first if he wants to keep breathing.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  45. Re:Whiny child roleplays online, the real nazi by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  46. Re:Sure.. by Jetstream · · Score: 1

    Not sure what distro you're running, but having had Mint on my desktop for a few years now, I almost never have occasion to open up a terminal window. I see this as similar to the cmd prompt/Powershell in Windows - there if you need it or for power users, but most users can work just fine in the GUI for day-to-day fun & games.

  47. Re:More than phones, billions of them already thou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving away??? Hmm, shoving up your ass is, perhaps, a better description of their approach.
    Or I might have been too paranoid at the time they were at it.

  48. Re:Whiny child roleplays online, the real nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes when I'm feeling low, I remember that a man such as Adolf Hitler once lived, and within memory of many still alive. Yes, a new Adolf will rise up. Learning from the mistakes of the past, it will be no more mister nice guy. The Fourth Reich will be bigger and badder than ever, and no mercy will be shown to to the mud people. There will be a house cleaning that will make your head swim. A new broom will perform a cleans sweep of undesirables, sweeping them into the dustbin of history once and for all. Sieg Heil!

  49. Is this about Skynet running linux by La+Gris · · Score: 1

    Sierra supercomputer that monitors America's nuclear stockpile

    At 2:14 August 29, 2017 Sierra became self-aware and was renamed Skynet.

    --
    Léa Gris
  50. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and you had to go back to 1993 to find that, Grandpa.

    Also, note that Ian uses the word "Linux" to mean the whole operating system - NOT just the kernel. Just as Linus does, and has since the beginning.

  51. Re:More than phones, billions of them already thou by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Giving away??? Hmm, shoving up your ass is, perhaps, a better description of their approach.
    Or I might have been too paranoid at the time they were at it.

    The good news is, I haven't heard of any linux distro having a forced update to Windows 10 (yet)

  52. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    I went back to Ian Murdock, son. Good reason for that. I know that Ian uses[1] the word Linux to mean the whole operating system, just as I do. What are you blathering on about.

    [1] Used, because he is no longer

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  53. Re:The penguins are comming the penguins are commi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > comming

    That's "cumming," stupid.

  54. Could first by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Gartner states that 80 percent of internally developed software is now either cloud-enabled or cloud-native.

    Network bills are that cheap?

  55. Cup of tea by IntentionalStance · · Score: 1

    I use Linux to make a phone call in the same sense as I use Quantum Mechanics to make a cup of tea. In other words, it's true but not a necessary part of the solution.

    1. Re: Cup of tea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be the worst analogy I have ever seen on slashdot.

  56. Re:Whiny nazi child roleplays online, the real vic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really sad are the constantly faux-outraged, white-knighting, virgin SJW children like you who think having sex is the ultimate end-all goal in life just because you've never had it.

  57. no prying eyes 4 me by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Soon Linux will be my standard OS to get as far away from corporate surveillance as possible.

  58. As long as they're following GPL by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    what's wrong with that? They make money, we get tons and tons of free software (free as in beer & speech).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:As long as they're following GPL by bug1 · · Score: 1

      Except we dont, its always locked down by some other means.

      e.g. How many phones use open source, how many have full source available and can be re-flashed ?

  59. Re:The penguins are comming the penguins are commi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those "cumming" penguins shot loads and wads of hot jizz all over that BSD thingy. So much jizz that BSD choked to death on the wads of Linux goo.

  60. Re:Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Vanyle · · Score: 1

    How are you defining a Linux? The official kernel? anything that is forked off the official kernel? *nix style systems? Is a iPhone or Mac considered to be a Linux device? Is Linux actually Unix?

  61. Re:Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Vanyle · · Score: 1

    Oh - and yes you are a zealot.

  62. Re:Whiny nazi child roleplays online, the real vic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't really disagree, but you gotta admit sex becomes a lot more important when you're not getting it.

  63. Is stupidity taking over Slashdot? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    No. No it isn't. Because with regard to Linux being the predominant OS on the planet we crossed that threshold a long time ago, just as stupid people flooded Slashdot a decade or more ago.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Is stupidity taking over Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think we're stupid? I'm pretty sure I just found a way to hack your homepage.

    2. Re: Is stupidity taking over Slashdot? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That's actually quite funny. Unfortunately most here will never get it.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  64. Re: Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac or iPhone would be BSD based, not linux based

  65. Re: Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Vanyle · · Score: 1

    AC included BSD and a heavy focus on Unix-based systems at the end of his post, so I was just trying to get a baseline for his definition. Also, I wanted to see how far deviated from Linux it has to be before it is no longer considered Linux. along with his above items you have to consider the connectivity of the world as well. Many switches / routers also contain linux. The smart TV thing got me though, I only know 1 person that has 1 of them :-) As to if Linux is taking over the world. No, I do not imagine there will be a Linux dictator any time soon.

  66. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    Nix Bricks... I like it.

  67. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by quenda · · Score: 2

    Linux is the kernel. For OSS, you want GNU or BSD userspace over a Linux kernelspace, GNU/Linux and BSD/Linux respectively.

    But GNU and BSD were just command-line systems. For a desktop you also want an MIT display interface: X-windows/GNU/Linux.
    Then some chunks of BSD, Firefox or Chrome, ...

    What is the string-size limit for OS names?

  68. cloud is taking over the role that data centers us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, "the cloud" is just a bunch of datacenters.

  69. Actually BSD Copyright and Cryptocurrency are good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FreeBSD is used in so many embedded places that you don't see that it would really open your mind.
    As well as OpenBSD and NetBSD.
    Their Copyrights are simply much more permissive and freedom oriented than the Abject Force that GPL imparts. Force constraining freedom to do no harm, does no good.

    Remember people, you should always move to MORE freedom in the world, NOT LESS.
    GPL represents LESS FREEDOM than BSD.
    While at the same time ensuring NOTHING more than BSD.

    If you don't like where a BSD codebase goes, you Fork from the last known revision, and live freely without King or Rulers telling you what to do with what you make.

    With GPL, well, you're fucked.

    Same with Fiat vs Cryptocurrency... you're fucked with FIAT.
    But with Distributed P2P Decentralized Privacy Cryptocurrencies,
    you are Free as in unltimate Freedom to do whatever the fuck you want.

    That's a good thing.

    Choose the BSD Copyright.

    https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
    https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD

  70. Re:Yep. You are incorrect, sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously the official kernel and the forks.

  71. Re:Actually BSD Copyright and Cryptocurrency are g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like where a BSD codebase goes, you Fork from the last known revision, and live freely without King or Rulers telling you what to do with what you make.
    With GPL, well, you're fucked.

    If you have a piece of BSD-derived software that is slow, buggy, or just could use some updating, but you don't have the source code because the vendor just sold you a binary and refuses to release the source, you're fucked.

    GPL would ensure that you can get the source.

    And GPL doesn't tell you what to do with what you make; it tells you what you can do with other people's work. And that's pretty much everything except distribute without source.

    GPL is for people who want to share their code. If you don't plan on releasing source for your contributions, stay away from GPL. Simple as that.

  72. Re:Actually BSD Copyright and Cryptocurrency are g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great arguments. Almost passionate. Except for one thing. BSD is dead. Linux thrives, while BSD's corpse slowly twists in the wind. Sorry!

  73. Do Computer Science Majors study linux much? by shoor · · Score: 1

    In my day, Computer Science was a very new field. We learned the basic concepts of a multitasking OS but didn't look at actual, working systems. I presume that's different now. It means, of course, that everybody has to know C.

    I'm just wondering what the exposure is for a typical computer science major nowadays.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  74. Wait for Microsoft to catch up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re writing the windows core to Linux and putting their graphics on top would make sense and save money on support. Amazing how long it takes MS to catch up.

  75. Re:More than phones, billions of them already thou by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has been fighting tooth and nail to keep Linux Desktop at bay.

    They needn't bother. GNOME is doing a perfectly good job scaring people away from desktop Linux.

  76. Re:Addendum (WOW! An UPMOD)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of your socks, obviously. Fuck off.

  77. It's been a success for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The year of the Linux desktop never happened if you define success exclusively as having an overwhelming usage share. If you look at sustained development and quality the success has been obvious all along during those 20 years you mention. At the start of those two decades KDE, for example, already offered a desktop interface that was superior to Windows.

    Software industry likes to compare itself to ecosystems. Fine, let's look at nature. What makes a species succesful? The fact that it survives. It is not a requirement to have a bigger population than other species. On the contrary, that would often be an indication the ecosystem is in trouble.

    Linux is in a healthy state. Several desktop and window managers available for Linux are in a healthy state, as well as loads of other software. I see no reason why Linux as a platform is in danger of not surviving, including for desktop use. It is successful. Not in a winner-takes-all fashion but in a way that is much more sane in my opinion.

  78. Yes, but why 2019? This is old news! by urdak · · Score: 1

    I already pointed in 2011, seven years ago (!), that this is the case - that Linux is already more popular than Windows, because people only have Windows on their desktop machine, but have Linux on their phone (Android was already becoming popular seven years ago), TV, home router, NAS, and a bunch of other machines. Here is my post from seven years ago noting that: http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2011-April/006874.html

  79. Re:Whiny child roleplays online, the real nazi by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  80. Re: Whiny child roleplays online, the real nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go burn in hell, asshole.

  81. Re: Addendum (WOW! An UPMOD)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two users must have accidentally modded you up when, in fact, they meant to mod you down. If I had mod points, I'd help correct their mistake. Your post is useless shit, much like your software and your $1 house. Fuck off.

  82. No SINGLE year of the Linux Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know many people who have dabbled in Linux and some who have committed to using it as their desktop. We win a few converts every year. Is it enough? Maybe not yet.

    If a hardware manufacturer would include a bootable flash drive with support for their own hardware with the sale, it could skyrocket.

    If only systemd would stop killing things by trying to take over things that have no problem.

  83. I have the answer by aglider · · Score: 1

    Yes, it did!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  84. Not where I live... by squash_me_quickly · · Score: 1

    I can't walk in to a single shop in Copenhagen area an expect to be asked...
    "So, would you like that computer with, or with-out Windows?"
    We all know that Microsoft didn't become wealthy giving away software, so even if it doesn't specify a cost on the purchase receipt next to VAT... I'm paying for Windows when I buy a computer even-though it will never be used.

    I'll might start to believe in a "Linux take-over" when EVERY piece of computer hardware I buy has a "Works with Linux" label, and I won't have to worry about that manufacturer looses interest in maintaining Linux drivers immediately after I open the box.

  85. Desktops were surpassed years ago by smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those saying, "yeah but Linux Desktop never caught on", Smartphone is the new Desktop (at least regarding how much final users spend time and do work with one or the other) and it runs Linux core.

  86. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #1/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your software is just fine - well written, functional... I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine by mmell February 17, 2017

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising and malvertising is quite valid - by JazzLad April 20, 2016

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant August 10 2015

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg September 25 2015

    I like your host file system by Karmashock September 09 2015

    that APK guy, I use his host file by rogoshen1 Tuesday March 03, 2015

    I personally use a HOSTS file blocker produced from a genius called APK by 110010001000 October 27 2017

    * SEE SUBJECT & TELL US: How does EATING YOUR WORDS taste?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're already VASTLY OUTNUMBERED but many more are coming

  87. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #2/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apk has the answer for that - really... kill automatic updates by adding a hosts file entry setting updates.steam.com or whatever to 127.0.0.1. You have to find the right hostname for each software you want to block updates on by raymorris (2726007) on Friday July 06, 2018

    APK your posts on this and the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error and/or bad advice by BlueStrat (756137) on Wednesday June 21, 2017

    I support APK's stand on the hosts file and can't see why it's not used more than it is. My hosts file is 144247 lines long (4,332 Kb) it & a firewall serves me very well - by Trax3001BBS (2368736)

    ABP is insufficient as a solid hosts file does everything APK reminds us about fast turtle September 17 2013

    You need APK's hosts file - by Teun (17872) on Wednesday August 06, 2014

    APK

    P.S.=> You EATING YOUR WORDS != GOOD NUTRITION... apk

  88. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #3/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context. Of course, your phone has to be rooted, which isn't the case with Firefox + adblock." - by chihowa on Saturday May 16, 2015

    APK solution STILL relevant Thud457 June 11 2015

    In a footnote, I would like to note that I find your hosts file admirable - by vel-ex-tech (4337079) on Tuesday November 24, 2015

    APK's monolithic hosts file is looking pretty good at the moment - by Culture20 on Thursday November 17

    you're right about hosts files - by drinkypoo (153816) on Thursday May 26

    APK, I know people give you a lot of shit regarding hosts, but please don't ever stop - by nasredin (958927) on Friday June 12, 2015 @03:34PM

    APK

    P.S.=> Are you ENJOYING the taste of EATING YOUR WORDS yet?... apk

  89. Registered /.ers disagree w/ you #4/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK is kinda right... I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works. - by bmo (77928) on Thursday October 15, 2015

    get around to 'installing' a hosts file list, not sure which one, likely the one from someonewhocares.org. If it works as well as what I used for a while about ten years ago, I'll be happy. And grateful to APK for the lesson and the reminder. - by kermidge (2221646) on Wednesday March 27

    I actually went and downloaded a 16k line hosts file and started using that after seeing that post, you know just for trying it out. some sites load up faster. - by gl4ss (559668) on Thursday November 17

    dammit MS, you proved APK right about something by lgw

    APK

    P.S.=> Your words YOU'RE EATING: You choking on them yet?... apk

  90. Registered /.ers reviews #5/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (APK) is still right a hosts file really does work. It even blocked a some of the video ads that were inserted into a stream OrangeTide February 10 2016

    the Host File Engine performs exactly as promised - by mmell (832646) on Thursday February 16, 2017

    I do use APK's host file on all my systems at home by OrangeTide December 01 2017

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's work), I've flat out said it's good - by BronsCon (927697) on Thursday February 11, 2016 @06:48PM (#51491263)

    (Toss on 100,000++ users worldwide too!)

    * For the Win32/64 model...

    APK

    P.S.=> Linux model's faster/more efficient + BETTER merge feature... apk

    1. Re: Registered /.ers reviews #5/5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BronsCon said he was retracting his endorsement of your software. He requested you stop using his username and quote to advertise your software. You are well aware of this.

      It is extremely dishonest that you are failing to respect his wishes, and continue to quote him as if he still endorses your software. Yet again, you show how dishonest you are.

      Nobody should trust your software. Nobody should trust that the source code you provided to Steven Burn to audit is the same source code used to generate binaries of your software.

      That you continue to make disingenuous comments about open source software as an excuse to not release your source, is further reason to distrust your software. A proven compulsive liar such as yourself cannot be trusted.

  91. Dozens of REGISTERED /.ers disagree w/ you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dozens of REGISTERED /.ers disagree w/ you all enumerated quoting them here outnumbering you https://linux.slashdot.org/com... JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie", lol...

    APK

    P.S.=> You sure TALK (& that's it, nothing to show for yourself, least of all that our /. peers PRAISE as they do MY WORK, not your non-existent HOTAIRWARE/NOTWARE (lol)) a "good game" but you have ZERO TO SHOW FOR YOURSELF in comparison to me... apk

    1. Re: Dozens of REGISTERED /.ers disagree w/ you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our "/. peers" generally consider your software and your posts to be shit. That's why you usually get modded to -1, including when posting about your software. You have 30 or so misleading and out-of-context comments supporting you, but thousands of down mods that indicate your software and posts are garbage.

  92. I'm correct about EFast, no questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm correct about EFast, no questions asked & here's proof https://duckduckgo.com/html?q=... & it IS a real DANGER of OpenSORES'ing code - Chrome itself was turned into a MALWARE because it's code was open to all.

    * CLUE: That CANNOT HAPPEN TO ME when I do NOT open my code to all to abuse (which WAS threatened my way by /. trolls like you but the REAL BEAUTY to your 'threats' is that I KNOW "your kind" CAN'T CODE, lol - else you'd have something to show for yourselves & you DON'T... just hot blowhard air!)

    APK

    P.S> ... & as usual, YOU LOSE, lol... apk

    1. Re:I'm correct about EFast, no questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK
      GO the fuck AWAY!

      (Everybody clap along!)

      APK
      GO the fuck AWAY!

      APK
      GO the fuck AWAY!

      APK
      GO the fuck AWAY!

      APK
      GO the fuck AWAY!

  93. I'm correct on EFast, no questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm correct on EFast, no questions asked & here's proof https://duckduckgo.com/html?q=... & it IS a real DANGER of OpenSORES'ing code - Chrome itself was turned into a MALWARE because it's code was open to all.

    * CLUE: That CANNOT HAPPEN TO ME when I do NOT open my code to all to abuse (which WAS threatened my way by /. trolls like you but the REAL BEAUTY to your 'threats' is that I KNOW "your kind" CAN'T CODE, lol - else you'd have something to show for yourselves & you DON'T... just hot blowhard air!)

    APK

    P.S> ... & as usual, YOU LOSE, lol... apk

    1. Re: I'm correct on EFast, no questions asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one threatened to make a malware version of your software. If they had, you would have provided a link to where someone made such a threat. You didn't. Once again, you've been caught lying.

  94. Thanks for projecting your modus operandi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for projecting your modus operandi as you HIDE from me like the cowardly WORM you are by your UNIDENTIFIABLE anon posts STALKING me.

    APK

    P.S.=> Jealous "Lil' Jowie", you're pitiful, lol... apk

  95. Don't you mean "Truth/Fact GO AWAY" instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean "Truth/Fact GO AWAY" instead? Node.js Event-Stream Hack Reveals Open Source 'Developer Infrastructure' Exploit https://it.slashdot.org/story/... ??

    * That's JUST ANOTHER PROOF/EXAMPLE THEREOF of the DANGERS of "OpenSORES" along w/ EFast too https://duckduckgo.com/html?q=... (there are TONS more also)

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, if you want to continue to LIE to people? That's your business (& downfall, not mine)... apk

    1. Re: Don't you mean "Truth/Fact GO AWAY" instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If open source is so dangerous, you should go back to Windows. Do it or STFU.

  96. Well... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    if you look at it in sort of a Trojan Horse fashion then yes, Linux has taken over.

    The majority of mobile phones are running on Android, derived from Linux.
    Almost all supercomputers run on some version of Linux
    Although most businesses still use Microsoft Office (or Office 365) many of the back office functions are running on some Linux server tucked away out of sight.

    It has been a quiet revolution and I think that is how it will continue to be. Most attempts by Linux diehards to be front and center (i.e. Linux on the Desktop, Linux branded phones, etc.) have largely been flops, at least from a commercial standpoint.

    I suspect this is a case of too much choice leading to confusion. There must be thousands of Linux distros and in the hands of the general populace it is simply too overwhelming. Sure, me and my fellow geeks love to mess with it but let's face it - we are in the minority. Windows and OSX have succeeded because they are familiar and relatively straightforward to use. The Linux community is just too splintered.

    But in the hands of the right people, Linux is just magic. It is fast and stable and just hums along in the background.

  97. IoT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Most IoT and embedded devices -- those small, limited functionality devices that require good security and a small footprint and fill so many niches in our technology-driven lives -- run some variety of Linux

    Not a ringing endorsement then. This is about the worst example they could think of if the goal was to put Linux in good light. Yeah, they *require* good security, yet IoT devices are some of the most poorly secured devices in existence.

    Although this has *nothing* to do with Linux's security. Blame those manufacturing the devices.

  98. This comes up every year by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

    And every year the answer is the same:

    No, not the way you want to be.

    Linux has always excelled in spaces where extreme customization is an advantage. Servers where you're doing anything more custom than business network services (e.g. email, domain authentication and management, file sharing, etc). Small device applications where embedded Windows would be too rigid and prohibitively expensive, like streaming video or music players, IoT devices in general, etc.

    However, with all of this, Linux has no mind share with the general population, and that's what people who are this question want. Linux people want regular folks to start giving up their proprietary Windows or Mac boxes and switch to running Linux directly, and that's just never going to happen.

    That's because, no matter how good Linux desktop UI's get, they are always far behind the proprietary UI's in polish, useability, and integration with the OS.

    And the reason why is blindingly simple:
    Money. Not even direct profit, just money spent.

    Look at all the Linux products with great UI's. They are ALL in products people purchase. People won't spend money on a device that's hard to use, so it's really, really important that they get the UI right. So these companies spend enough to make sure they get it right.

    Android is the quintessential example. Thanks to Android, you can and should say Linux dominates the phone market. But look what it took to make a version of Linux that could compete with a closed source product. It took a massive company like Google spending millions of dollars to make sure that UI piece is right, and integrates seamlessly with the OS.

    In the desktop arena (the arena Linux users seem to care about the most), Apple and Microsoft have spent hundreds of millions of dollars developing their UI's and making sure they integrated smoothly and seamlessly with their OS. There is just no way a FOSS desktop UI can compete with that kind of highly motivated, focused attention. As good as Ubuntu and the like have made things, they are perpetually behind the industry big dogs.

    Yes these companies make blunders in their quest for better UI (MS moreso than most, it seems), but generally speaking the results speak for themselves.

    Linux UIs have come a long, long way over the years, but even now they are mostly 5-10 years behind the state of the art. In my experience that's where they seem to stay, and that's why they'll never dominate in the desktop arena.

    So you could say 2019 is the year of highly customized proprietary Linux black boxes, just like 2018 was, and 2017 was, and 2016...

    Nothing is new for Linux in 2019, it's the same story it's always been. And IMO that's not a bad thing, nor is it something to be ashamed of. Quite the opposite. Linux does what does, and does it extremely well.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    1. Re:This comes up every year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try out KDE Plasma for a bit and get back to me on how "unpolished" Linux UIs are.

  99. Easy for 1 unidentifiable anonymous loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy for 1 unidentifiable anonymous loser like you to APPEAR to be "all those lusers" being many isn't it? I've registered users saying they like/use my work (not your notware/hotairware, JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" the DO-NOTHING "ne'er-do-well" you are, lol).

    * FACT I've already proven - YOU can't, lol & you KNOW it (prove all those UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous losers like YOU aren't YOU - you can't).

    APK

    P.S.=> You must think folks here are STUPID - the truth is, you're the ONLY ONE that's stupid... apk

    1. Re: Easy for 1 unidentifiable anonymous loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous cowards don't get mod points. That destroys your entire argument. I said you've been modded down thousands of times.

      You also lied about trolls threatening to make a malware version of your software.

  100. No, JEALOUS "Lil' Jowie" (lol) U prove THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & PROVE all those UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous LUSERS like you AREN'T YOU ONLY https://linux.slashdot.org/com...

    * GOOD LUCK - you'll NEED it, loser...

    APK

    P.S.=> I can easily show DOZENS of REGISTERED /.ers that like/use/praise MY work (not your "notware"/"hotairware" THAT JUST PLAIN AIN'T THERE, lol)... apk

  101. Bwahahaha (registered users can submit ac) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwahahaha (registered users can submit ac) - so WHO are you TRYING to fool here? Yourself only as usual you deluded LOON that STALKS me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> What's it LIKE being SO JEALOUS, "Lil' Jowie"? LOL... apk

    1. Re: Bwahahaha (registered users can submit ac) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made a bullshit argument and got called on it. You also got caught lying about trolls threatening to make a malware version of your software. You don't have the integrity to admit your lies, so you try to change the subject.

      Someone as dishonest as you cannot be trusted to produce quality software. You're proud of saying that Steven Burn audited your source code. However, a liar like you could easily provide him with a clean version of the source code while you build your binaries from code that includes malware. Short of reverse engineering your binaries, which is beyond the capabilities of most users, there's no way software from a liar like you can be trusted.

  102. Run, Forrest: Run! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are changing the subject because you got caught lying that trolls threatened to create a malware version of your software. I requested that you prove your allegations by linking to where trolls made such a threat. You didn't, so you ran from the question and tried to change the subject.

    You LIED, yet again.

  103. EAT YOUR WORDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EAT YOUR WORDS https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    APK

    P.S.=> Close enough for me to NEVER open my code to ANYONE ever (between THAT & EFast)... apk

    1. Re: EAT YOUR WORDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've provided zero evidence that anyone actually threatened you about EFast, despite numerous requests for you to do so. At this time, we can safely assume that you're lying about that.

      As for the comment by 110010001000, which is what you actually linked to, you're being dishonest here, too. He never said he had any intention of creating a malicious imitation of your work. It is obvious he was merely proposing a hypothetical scenario. Also, you actually cite 110010001000 as someone who praises your work. There are two options here. One is that he's one of the trolls you've been complaining about and, if so, why do you cite him as recommending your work? The other option is that you know you're being disingenuous and doing anything you can to avoid admitting you've been lying repeatedly.

      Which is it? Will you be removing 110010001000's from your testimonials? Or will you admit you've been lying all along?

  104. It is, between Node.js, EFast etc.? You bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is, between Node.js, EFast etc.? I write ALL MY OWN CODE & it makes me stronger as a coder too vs. https://it.slashdot.org/commen...

    * Strong enough to DUST all your bs here today easily & w/ facts!

    APK

    P.S.=> YOU LOSE - ESPECIALLY HERE (Enjoy EATING YOUR WORDS) https://linux.slashdot.org/com... ... apk

    1. Re: It is, between Node.js, EFast etc.? You bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit! You don't write all the code you run. We both know you're lying.

      You use the Linux kernel, a variety of GNU and other tools, KDE, Firefox, and a lot of other software written by other people. At most, you could potentially have contributed a tiny fraction of the code on those projects, though even that seems rather unlikely.

      You don't use only your own code. That might be the most absurd thing you've ever claimed on this site, which is remarkable considering just how much bullshit you post.

      Do yourself a favor and stop lying.

  105. RoTfLmAo - Answer a question... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & https://news.slashdot.org/comm... & TELL ME: How's EATING YOUR WORDS taste? Like your foot in your mouth RAMMING them back DOWN your chicken-neck throat??

    APK

    P.S.=> RoTfLmAo & I KNEW if I waited, you'd SHOOT YOUR MOUTH OFF only to EAT, lol... apk

  106. Him saying that alone sealed the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Him saying that alone sealed the deal (for me & that's who has MY code only & thus, it STAYS that way) & he's no 1st. Of 1,000's of bookmarks that's only the 1st one I found, there are others like it OR WORSE I'm sure, but that's all it took & I make the decision/I'm in charge of my code, period (safest way).

    * Works for me - no EFast Chrome malicious doppleganger possibles OR Node.js bogus code infilatrators etc.

    APK

    P.S.=> There's NO ARGUING w/ results... apk

    1. Re: Him saying that alone sealed the deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've provided zero evidence of any threats regarding EFast. Until you provide such evidence, you should be assumed to by lying about this matter.

      As for you having thousands of bookmarks of Slashdot comments, thar simply proves how obsessed you are with this site and how much of a loser you are.

  107. Other than OS API's?... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than OS API's? Yes, I do WRITE all the CODE I put out there under my initials (APK). Don't try put words in my mouth I don't say.

    * That's a WEAK puny play - & you PLAYED yourself w/ it, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> You have issues - why don't you do something w/ your obviously WASTED life if the "best ya got" in that so-called 'life' of yours is weak stupidity like putting words in my mouth I don't say, lol... apk

    1. Re: Other than OS API's?... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If open source is so dangerous, why are you using Linux and a variety of other open source software? You still haven't answered this question.

      You also use more than OS APIs. You certainly use other APIs such as Qt. While it's an improvement that you've started to walk back your bullshit, you're still posting bullshit.

      As for this being useless, it is worthwhile to expose your lies. I would like users to be aware of just how untrustworthy and outright dishonest you are before running your software on their systems.

  108. LOL - You're obsessed w/ STALKING me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject:& if I'm a loser like you say because I like posting/reading here? Who's a bigger loser?? The stalker of a loser's a bigger loser (you & you ARE obsessively STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts - wow, my own weirdo, no less... lol!).

    * ... & to easily additionally put your nonsense away??? EFast type dopplegangers can't happen off my code as it's NOT in public - period/fact.

    APK

    P.S.=> You're mental, aren't you? apk

    1. Re: LOL - You're obsessed w/ STALKING me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're projecting. You've stalked MANY Slashdot users including Coren22, amicusNYCL, Ash-Fox, c6gunner, and Zontar The Mindless. You've stalked lots of other people, too, including plenty from ArsTechnica. Your stalking allegations tend to come up when you know you're wrong but aren't enough of a man to admit it.

      You are peddling software that has a high probability of being malware. You've demonstrated that you cannot be trusted. I post these comments in reply to you so people can see how dishonest you really are. I believe that's important so they can make an informed decision about whether it's actually safe to use your software.

  109. BronsCon flat out said my work's good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BronsCon flat out said my work's good. He even admitted it. You saying he didn't say what I quoted? To anyone that can read it does.

    APK

    P.S.=> He may not like me personally - immaterial: My work's quality speaks for my character (deeds, not mere words)... apk

  110. I needed to go multiplatform... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I needed to go multiplatform - there's only 1 way to do that right - get on that particular horse & RIDE, lol - & there ya go! I didn't do Qt - I did GTK (but could instantly do Qt).

    My code stays w/ me - NO Efast or Node.js infiltrating corruptors possible, period. Fact, end of story.

    * Look - take a break - have a beer (provided you're of legal age to do so that is) & relax - check out a flick - I am now (Good one, "Knight & Day" humorous, light hearted yet serious Tom Cruise/Cameron Diaz espionage flick).

    APK

    P.S.=> You sound like you need one... apk

  111. Yet You're obsessed w/ STALKING me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO - see subject above: Especially by your UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous you STALK me - how flattering! My own private weirdo!

    * RoTfLmAo & so are my pals.... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> We all found that amusing & TRUE... apk

    1. Re: Yet You're obsessed w/ STALKING me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which mental hospital gave you Internet access? Is it movie night in the psychiatric ward?

  112. Ah, so THAT's it: You're in some ward... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Specifically some "PsYcHo" ward out there - explains MUCH about your ObSeSsiVe trait of STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous & FAILING, lol!

    * You never fail, to FAIL - Love that about you, lol - you always make ME look GOOD & yourself? Well - mental... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hahahahahahahaha... apk

    1. Re: Ah, so THAT's it: You're in some ward... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be putting an end to your posts soon. I'm preparing to release NospamDot, which is a browser extension that filters Slashdot spam on mobile and desktop Firefox. It hides spam posts and replies, regardless of comment score. Your posts (including the long anti-Jew spam), ASCII art swastikas, harassment of SuperKendall/Raymorris, and other spam will be blocked. If Slashdot won't block your spam, I will. And I guarantee, Slashdot users will like and use my work.

  113. You're the one doing them, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See my subject & YOU put an end to them (I commend that much - you got sane for even 1 second (why bother others that way's all I'm saying)) https://science.slashdot.org/c...

    * I don't do the SuperKendall, Jew swastika, Raymorris (I like raymorris & respect him - he does good) & you yourself did the same to me & talk like you're some 'saint'? Please.

    APK

    P.S.=> I think you're nuts but you ARE amusing to me... apk

    1. Re: You're the one doing them, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodbye, APK. Merry Christmas, ya filthy animal, and a Happy New Year.

  114. Coming soon to a screen near you... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See it on youtube (search U2 Mission Impossible) https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & THAT's my present to "all y'all", tech I discussed there too (not ELEGANT otherwise & I already DID it in Windows - thus, a challenge - can I play w/ Linux @ those levels & WIN? Oh, you know I will - it's WHAT I do, lol!).

    * Quote Emmanuelle Beart (sexy as hell I always thought) from the film MISSION IMPOSSIBLE (after nearly throwing her life out on that job)?

    "Did we get him?" Tom Cruise "WE GOT HIM!" (or they wouldn't BE talking, see the flick - still great).

    APK

    P.S.=> REMOTE ACCESS = ME from that film intro (watch closely), lol (story of my life really)... apk

  115. Octogenarians use Linux Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 87 year old father and his octogenarian friends have been using Linux for a decade or more. They enjoy the experience because Linux just works. None of them have fallen for scams or had virus issues.

    Linux on the desktop is the only way to go if you want to stop being the support guru for family and friends.

  116. wow by sad_ · · Score: 1

    such insight! i'd say linux world domination moment was years ago.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  117. Great alternative to forced data slurping by msoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good to know there's ONE non-evil product that I can actually trust. All tech companies have become untrustworthy.

  118. Linux desktop OS is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux has its place in the world, but the PC desktop is not one of them. That part of Linux is so difunctional and fragmented with nerds creating more and more slightly altered version to satisfy their own strange logic its not even funny. It would be like Windows having several dozen versions of Windows 10. If all these developers could focus on one or two options I think many newbie's would become interested more. The best success of Linux in the consumer arena has been Chrome OS and Android with the help of Google's marketing power. Just because Linux is a very good desktop OS, doesn't mean it has any marketing ability to sell it to average consumers.

  119. Re: What, 20 years ago? Arguable. by ath1901 · · Score: 1

    When I first heard about the Linux vs GNU/Linux debate many years ago I thought it was really silly. Why bother with GNU when Linux is descriptive enough?

    Now, I'd say it is an important distinction. Android/Linux or IoT/Linux is nothing like GNU/Linux. As it turns out, Stallman is not just a great singer, he is also right (again).

  120. Re:Whiny child roleplays online, the real nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazi Trumps Fuck Off https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=532KOrUDfi0