Slashdot Mirror


China To Force Changes To 20 Popular Games, Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: A panel of censors set up to vet mobile video games in China has signaled it will be hard to please. State media reports that of the first 20 titles it assessed, nine were refused permission to go on sale. The Xinhua news agency added that developers of the other 11 had been told they had to make adjustments to remove "controversial content." The authorities have voiced concerns about the violent nature of some titles as well as worries about the activity being addictive.

It was announced in August that a new body -- the State Administration of Press and Publications -- had taken over responsibility for approving games and that it would limit the number of online titles available. And although it has not been specified, some experts are assuming that the new panel will operate under its auspices. Xinhua said it is comprised of gaming experts, government-employed researchers, and representatives from the media and video games industry. But it provided no other information about who they were or the titles they had already examined.
UPDATE: The list of games being examined by the ethics panel has been revealed by users on NGA, a Chinese gaming forum. A number of games, such as League of Legends, Overwatch, Diablo, and World of Warcraft, will need "corrective action," while others will be "banned/withdrawn" entirely. Some of the most popular prohibited titles include Fortnite and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

183 comments

  1. Don't Sell to China... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Sell them NOTHING. Change NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

    1. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Sell them NOTHING. Change NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

      And give up all that revenue and profits? What are you? Some pinko lefty?!
      Profits rule! Human rights drool!
      Human rights and freedom are just job killing regulations that reduces our standard of living and hurts America!

      -Your Corporate Masters.
      (God Bless Citizens United and a President who convinces people to censor on their own ["CNN is fake news!"])

    2. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

    3. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some pinko lefty?!

      The pinko lefties are cheering for censorship these days. They've been crusading against women showing any kind of skin harder than ISIS.

    4. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But ... but ... but profit! Why do you hate capitalism?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The notion is that videogame characters cannot make choices on their own volition. Video game developers make those choices for them and dress them up as hookers, make them behave like incels want their women to be, and so forth; for money. And since a lot of people take their morals from whatever random shit they consume, these may be dangerous ideas.
      'Pinko lefties' also aren't the only ones who think along these lines. For example it's also quite popular among the more conservative right to believe that someone can be infected with the 'gay' if exposed to such ideas.
      It's not really a left or right thing. Stupidity is a bipartisan issue.
      It's also different for a real woman making the choice to wear revealing clothing or behaving in a specific way on their own. In this case it is their basic human right to do so. At least according to our Western values. And here the majority of the 'pinko lefties' are likely to support a woman's choice to do this. While religious conservative organizations ISIS won't like it and force these people to behave according to ISIS values. And those puritanian conservatives may not like it as well.
      So yeah, not really a fair comparison given the context and therefore pretty much a strawman.


      There is some logic to it after all.

      But I think it still flawed logic. Why? Because completely misses the underlying issue. Whether you want to seem video games as art or just entertainment doesn't matter a lot here. Video game characters are fictional, expect perhaps for some unusual cases where a video game may be historically correct. The bottom line being that they're just expressions of ideas.

      And if people were capable of realizing that video games aren't reality, and that they should not base the moral values they apply to the real world purely on these fictions, there ought to be no problem. And if people don't understand this, teaching them should be our mission instead of censoring things.

    6. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Sell them NOTHING. Change NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

      They outnumber us, and, well... the entire Western World. We don't cut them off from the world... they cut us off. If they ever come close to parity for production/earnings as the West they would easily be able to dominate the world. It's a shame about their government choice, for sure. I wish India would hurry up and modernize their economy and get to Western standards. Politically India is closer to the West in ideals and outlook. I'd much rather them dominate the world than China.

      Just like the US has been able to enforce it's will around the globe for the last 80 years- give it a generation and China will be doing that. I don't like the sound of China modeling the world in it's image.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

      It is harder to organize dissent when everything you do is tracked and recorded. Not saying it won't happen, but it's a lot harder to organize a protest now than it was in the 1980's.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    8. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pubg and fortnite teach survivalist strategies. can't have the population learning anything about that sort of thing unless the government wants them to.

    9. Re:Don't Sell to China... by mermeid007 · · Score: 0

      These games are for college students. We all played something like them in college. I don't remember learning much but how to waste time and money on alcohol from them.

    10. Re: Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming soon to the USA thanks to liberals.

    11. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also kill newborns for being female. Better to just plunder their mines and wealth.

    12. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of well placed nukes and they no longer outnumber us.

    13. Re: Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

    14. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame on US government choice for picking an orange for President. The other one who lost was even worse than an orange.

    15. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right. Just like how movies teach you how to use firearms. The 'survival' skills you learn in these games will get you killed in about 10 seconds flat in the real world. Turns out that in the real world, getting shot 5 times can't be fixed by wrapping some bandages around your arm or taking some pain pills. You'll just be dead. And you can't just join the next game 90 seconds later.

    16. Re:Don't Sell to China... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

      It is harder to organize dissent when everything you do is tracked and recorded. Not saying it won't happen, but it's a lot harder to organize a protest now than it was in the 1980's.

      They'll start doing it on holiday before their gov cracks down on foreign holidays.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    17. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really really really wish that the world would stop buying goods produced in china, at any consequence. Too bad it'll never happen.

    18. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only "survival training" you get is by NOT playing and therefore not crossing the road while consumed by your phone.

    19. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Video games are escapism from reality. It seems facetious to complain about a scantily-clad female for a fantasy but not brutal killing with giblets.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    20. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you should have done in the 19th century!

    21. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an idiotic comment. Nuclear war ends the world for all of us. Typical American.

    22. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 2

      The notion is that videogame characters ...

      It's doesn't matter what the "notion" is. To Hell with any group pushing for censorship of any legal entertainment content. The censorious part of the left is every bit as bad as the right-wing religious whackos. A pox on both their houses.

      We can do without moral scolds of any variety.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    23. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 1

      If they ever come close to parity for production/earnings as the West they would easily be able to dominate the world. It's a shame about their government choice, for sure.

      They did not choose their government, and they'll never come close to us in terms of productivity per capita, because totalitarian regimes never do. You don't get much economic growth without freedom. China coasts on off-shored manufacturing and stolen innovation, but has very little non-export economy. There are a few tech companies like TenCent that have done a little on their own, but that's a tiny part of an economy (and they, too, got hit by this censorship).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to protest. They can just sit down and strike. Not work, stay at home. Shut down the economy for a week and you will start to see change. Enough of the population gets fed up all at once, it won't take long for this to spread. You going to send soldiers after people staying at home or calling in sick?

    25. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, take it or leave it... We don't have to sell them games all those titles already are going well enough...
      But these decision are made by the top brass of capitalism.. They will make a cost/revenu analysis and if the changes are not too bad Im sure they will make them.
      I wonder how much more we will take before we say it's enough...

    26. Re:Don't Sell to China... by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll start doing it on holiday before their gov cracks down on foreign holidays.

      The new social credit score system keeps the ones in the country who might be interested in such things. Disagreeing with government bans you from using any kind of mass transit, loan or even your kids access to school.

    27. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So should we not be selling any electronics to America as well then? Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, I suppose we shouldn't be making your iPads, should we? You're just likely to use them to post racist abuse on Slashdot.

    28. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To Hell with any group pushing for censorship of any legal entertainment content.

      In that case, we just have to make titillating media illegal, well, at least when it's primarily enjoyed by straight males. Cultivation theory works for everything as long as you don't need to support it with evidence.

    29. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I've seen the "pinko lefties" showing plenty of skin recently - quite a few inked with slogans defending their right to do so without immediately being grabbed by the pussy by self-entitled prick,

      Keep drinking that kool-aid dude. I swear it didn't come from russian hookers.

    30. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sure, it would be nice to push the boundary the other way, but preventing new things from being legally censored would at least be something! (Actually, there's very little in the US that's legally blocked, most of the effective censorship is by the distribution companies. Kudos to Steam for recently changing to allow adult content. Tumblr OTOH ...)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:Don't Sell to China... by times05 · · Score: 1

      "they'll never come close to us in terms of productivity per capita". What a load arrogant BS. You really think you are so much more productive and creative that they'll never come close to you??? lol

      I don't care what country you live in, doesn't matter, it's not a true democracy anyway. You also have to be deluded to think that China is totalitarian. Surprise!!! There's millions of people involved in their "totalitarian" government making all kinds of decisions on all levels. Just like yours, wherever you're from. Had you been born Chinese you'd have about the same chance of having equal amount of input on how your government runs and its policy as you do right now, whatever country you are from. On the average it's next to no input at all.

    32. Re:Don't Sell to China... by The+Snazster · · Score: 1

      The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

    33. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume he was an American? He certainly wouldn't be a typical one. You, on the other hand, are just a typical stereotyper.

    34. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sure is a narrative.

    35. Re:Don't Sell to China... by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

      Well given the choice between the two countries, I'm sure glad I was born in America. Problems and all.

    36. Re:Don't Sell to China... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I note the confusion in your comment, it is bad to censor legal content, wait what?!? It is illegal because it was censored, so legal content has passed censorship, this with no claim of what is good or bad content, just that censorship is there already. So where will China draw the line, well, where ever it's people accept the line being drawn. Personally I hold with, you want government to provide you copyright protection as in censor, actively and viscously censor (arrest is not a fun process) that distribution of content by others, well, your content should pass a censorship board to test whether or not it is off sufficient social value to provide it copyright protection.

      See right there, the glaring blind ignorance in the censorship argument, censorship already occurs upon a mass scale, with prison sentences, violent raids, all at huge public expense, it's called copyright which is modern reality is more like copywrong due to the level of corruption in it's expansion and penalties. Oh the blindness of ideologues. Ahh censorship we like and censorship we don't like, interesting, apparently the difference how it suits their personal greed and nothing what so ever to do with morality, well, beyond it being immoral to deny them infinite wealth.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    37. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical gaming companies that pervert every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Buy from them NOTHING. Protect NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

    38. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll just leave this here (as usual the game designers, as well as other artists - think "Fight Club" - get there first):

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Goodness me, SMAC was soooooo prophetic! "Divided not by nationality, but by ideology and their vision for the new world". Spot on!

      We have the capitalists, the God's squad, the hard-asses, the blabbering, ineffectual UN, the scientists, the collectivists and the tree huggers. And all of them are flawed in their own way. I tell ya folks, give me a game of SMAC played by anyone to analyse and I'll come with big 5 personality trait score for that person that'd be quite close to reality. This is not a game, it's a personality test! And a manual of the most important philosophical ideas.

      It is not a coincidence that the above-linked video has the most views (albeit small number for a YouTube video). Some say that the most scary videos are the "psychotic" ones, like the Dream Twister. I think the scariest of the all is this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      Not so much the imagery (which is not nice, I admit) but the message!

      BTW, I am playing it again ATM and to my delight the faction that would give me the headache this time is the Hive (I never played anyone but the University; that tells you something about me, eh?). I do like squashing collectivists!

      Posting anon due to moderation
      Cheers!

    39. Re:Don't Sell to China... by ReneR · · Score: 1

      Funny, I think you mixed China with USA there,

    40. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, false equivalences. Gotta love them.
      True enough that copyright laws are often pretty stupid.
      And it's also pretty weird that downloading and sharing some music (for free) is punished more rigorously than crimes that cause some factual damage to natural persons.
      But the idea of intellectual property and that it should be protected at least to some degree does make sense. In our Western world that is.
      Hypothetically, without these protections all the intellectual work you do could just be appropriated by the biggest bully around (mega corporations or governments) and you can do little about it. You simply don't have the resources to outproduce them or allow yourself to undercut their prices.
      And this is where selling to the Chinese becomes relevant here.

      Chinese manufacturers of Western products use their factories to acquire the necessary know how and means for production of a certain product. Then when they cut ties they keep all that stuff, maybe make minor alterations to the product and then sell a ripoff version of it for money.

      I've witnessed part of this process first hand when I was sent to Wuxi Wanda Industrial in China. They ordered some of our lifting machines to be employed in their warehouses and also requested them to be installed by our service technicians which I was supervising.
      So what I've seen there was that they had various similar machines from competitors in place already when I arrived there. They diligently recorded everything we did during the installation of our machines.
      Socializing with some of their workers, who were friendly enough to and willing to communicate in English, I found out that they apparently were testing which of the machines performed the best in terms of durability and other factors that influence maintenance costs.
      A good old 'competition' if you will. But they wouldn't do it to find out from which company they would buy more machines in the future but to copy the winner or maybe reverse engineer it so they can built it themselves.
      I have to admit that it is a pretty rational move from their perspective. Even by our standards they legally acquired the machines. But seen through the filter of our Western values it's also an immoral act to just appropriate the idea of the technology like that. The problem here is that you can be pretty sure that these were the last machines we could sell to the Chinese, because after this they'll pretty much be able to replicate our work for themselves.
      Fortunately for us (Western companies), we haven't seen Chinese ripoffs of these machines on the Western market yet.

  2. we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has that by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has that power

  3. Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the same people who murdered over 100 million of their own citizens during peacetime, who cares about them banning some games?

    1. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? Technically everyone who is affected by this.
      That doesn't only mean the gamers who liked to play those games. It's really mostly all the corporations that made a profit from running or selling those games to the Chinese.

    2. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Everyone playing games does.

      China is a HUGE market. If anything, that Diablo immoral (or whatever that installment was called) makes it evident. Studios bend over backwards to cater to the Chinese market.

      Think your games will remain as they are? Think again. They know you'll buy the next Call of Battlefield anyway, even if it's a dumbed down phone minigame with microtransactions up the ass. They want that Chinese market.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

      Think your games will remain as they are? Think again.

      Or they can simply modify the edition the Chinese get. IIRC, Bungie had to make modifications to Myth for the European market, because some countries had a thing against blood in games, so they made the blood green. I think they also made enemies that exploded turn into confetti instead of a pile of carnage, but that might have been another game. I think Wolfenstein had to do the same thing in Germany because of the swastikas. Sure, it's probably a pain in the neck, but it can be done.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0

      They can, but it costs money and time, and they are not willing to spend either.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, Germany has a stream of bullshit changes to pander to their ridiculous Bundesprüfstelle to defend kids against reality (IIRC that's the most accurate translation), and in general they were hilarious. Top of my head I remember the suicide bombers in C&C Generals being gurneys with little bombs on them. But that's far from the most ridiculous change ever made in a game to get an a-ok from them.

      But we're not talking about cosmetic changes here. If you look at the reasons given as to why the games were banned, including reasons like "rewards given based on rank", "distorted concepts of history and culture" and "game missions include fraud", this means that fundamental aspects of the game, its core mechanics and the story it tries to tell, are suddenly no-gos.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Or they can simply modify the edition the Chinese get. IIRC, Bungie had to make modifications to Myth for the European market, because some countries had a thing against blood in games, so they made the blood green

      They, can, and short term they will... but really the battle from the Chinese government is not just against specific video games, the current government is against video games in general.

      That social worth score that they have where you're give a score by the government to say how good a citizen you are, it is impacted by video games. The more hours of video games you play, the more points you lose. Playing a lot of video games can mean you're banned from staying at certain hotels, getting some jobs, and visiting some shops. Granted, you probably have to waste your life away playing games for it to be significant, but they've already got a bias against video games built in.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      "They can, but it costs money and time, and they are not willing to spend either."

      Bingo.

      No one wants to support half a dozen different versions of a thing. Even you programmer types can agree on that one.

    8. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Half a dozen? Definitely.

      Two? A distinct possibility.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    9. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The most ridiculous decision was to ban river raid for brutality. River raid, for fuck's sake!

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    10. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      They can, but it costs money and time, and they are not willing to spend either.

      It's just another cost / benefit analysis. Some companies do spent the money and time because they see it as worthwhile over the life of the game. For example, Blizzard made a lot of visual changes to World of Warcraft just for China because they have some weird aversion to skeletons and bones. Player skeletons on the ground are replaced with tombstones, undead models don't show bones, bones and bits of meat on the ground are replaced with bread, etc.

      Sure, it may objectively be a waste of time, but if you want to sell in that market (and they let you sell, lol) then you just have to decide if it's worth it. As long as the Chinese don't start dictating how things look and function for everyone else, that seems fine (for a relative meaning of "fine" given the authoritarian society) with me.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    11. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Silent Service and Gunship were on the list too. Gunship. Of all the games. The infantry you "killed" were literally pixels.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      This is an opportunity to show just how risky investing too deeply into China is for gaming studios though. Remember that this review is just a start, and terms change with ebb and flow of Chinese leadership being made aware of potential harm that games may cause to Chinese "societal harmony". Which is the highest virtue in the Chinese system.

    13. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by lgw · · Score: 1

      How do they even get "game missions include fraud" for Diablo? Of all the things to pick to complain about.

      They also complained about "inharmonious chat" for every game. You want to do business in China, either eliminate all chat, or hire a huge team to monitor all chat in real time (I expect TenCent/RIOT will do the latter).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      We've already seen the effect of Hollywood bending over backwards, as you put it, to make movies they think will appeal to the Chinese market. It's a definite concern that videogame companies will tend to self-censor in anticipation of the objectives they think the Chinese censors will have.

      As an independent videogame developer, this places a fairly large burden on me. Do I pay for a Chinese localization and try to enter that market, and then subject myself to the whims of a board of censorship? My inclination is to tell them to piss off, but as a practical matter, that's discarding a potentially large market. Do human rights benefit simply by me refusal to participate in a particular market? Hard to say, but probably not. It's not like the US embargo really helped Cuba.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    15. Re: Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whataboutism.

    16. Re: Who cares about them banning games? by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      Whataboutism.

      Literally not an argument.

    17. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like their conceptualization of authority is just naive and they're not actually any more prepared for the wave of communication than their western counterparts huh.

    18. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That social worth score " "is impacted by video games."
      Do you have a source on this statement?

  4. Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I see how crazily obsessed children are with Fortnite, when I see some adults here, comparing a Fortnite ban to human rights violation, it makes me think that maybe banning this shit would be a good thing.

    GROW. UP.

    (And if we have to talk about what china are doing, let's talk about their violations of human rights)

    1. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, I could see a Chinese made Sim Concentration Camp being a big hit. It's educational.

      NPC

    2. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Man, authoritarians on all sides. Sucks to be a normal person who just wants to be free.

    3. Re:Maybe they are right this time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are talking in terms of "they are right this time", i.e. "I'm against banning things... except the stuff I don't like", then perhaps you need to read up a bit about what human rights are and why we have them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Slashdot. As our first adult visitor since 2012 we wish you welcome

    5. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never met a Chinese person who liked to play these games. Who was going to buy them in the first place?

    6. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't care about video games. What do you care about? Movies? Sports? What do you do when you have time off and want to relax, unwind and have a good time?

      Video games are, like all software, a product with a huge up front and a very tiny per-unit cost. In other words, your goal is to sell as many as possible, even more so than with any other product. Every unit sold, no matter how low the price, is higher than the cost per unit, so it counts towards profit.

      There is now a huge market in China. Nowhere in the world, the middle class grows as quickly as there. They not only want but they also do buy games. You want to cater to that market as a game producers.

      And since it's unlikely that we will get another version of the game out here in the "free" world, any ban, any limitation of speech, issued and enforced in China literally has an effect on us over here, too.

      Even if you don't give a fuck about human rights in China, this isn't about China alone. It's about China dictating what kind of entertainment will be produced for you, too.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just said that, then you are the one that needs to read up on what human rights are.

    8. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely. I cannot believe you seriously believe that people are stupid. If they try to sell scaled down diablo in the US it will not sell. Advertisements are still quite limited in their effect on people. If ads were so effective then why are they playing all the time? It is because they do not actually work very well.

    9. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... you met 1.3 billion of them!

    10. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Holi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OK, comparing a fucking video game ban to human rights violations is fucking ridiculous.

      "It's about China dictating what kind of entertainment will be produced for you"

      Really? how many video games are produced in China that make it to the world market?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    11. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Let's wait and see. The problem is that China is simply such a huge market that if they can land a hit in China, this would easily pick up the slack even if they totally bombed in the US and Europe.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many Hollywood movies now contain shoe horned in Chinese actors? Rogue One is one example. The flopped Independence day sequel os another. Yeah, it will never happen.

    13. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I see how crazily obsessed children are with Fortnite, when I see some adults here, comparing a Fortnite ban to human rights violation, it makes me think that maybe banning this shit would be a good thing.

      I hate Fortnight and PUBG and that whole genre of FPS games too!

      That's not what the worry is about, the worry is about yet another form of censorship from the world's largest market that will have impacts on us. It's getting to the point that what happens in China matters for the rest of the world. Just like people all over the world watch the American elections and dread which nincompoop gets elected this time, we're all going to start paying attention to China more- what China says and does has ripple effects throughout the world. Any move from China in the wrong direction means (in this global era) that it will impact what we have access to. And yes, Fortnight might be ridiculous crap, but even if you're more highbrow, your opera might be next, the ending has to change, or your films (no Asian allowed to be depicted as a villain- no capitalist or democratic sentiment in films).

      China is big enough now that the problems of China's citizens are our problems.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    14. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IN China? Very few. FOR China? Very many.

      China is a huge market. And unlike the Euro/US market it is growing, rapidly so. And a market that the big studios still don't sell well in.

      Fanboys will gobble up next year's "Generic Game Title 19". They have shown time and again that they will, no matter whether the game is any good. They buy it. And defend it tooth and nail against anyone pointing out that the quality has been deteriorating for years. They will buy GGT19 even if it's a weak port of a phone game (because phone games is what sells in China).

      But the Chinese will only buy GGT19 if it's a phone game.

      So take a wild guess what GGT19 will be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      When did I ever say I am against banning things? Human rights are NOT about allowing us to buy everything we want like spoiled children. In fact, we trample over the human rights of others, just to buy things cheaper.

    16. Re:Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Europe also had a lot of video game censorship, see things like "contra" becoming "probotector" because of the ban on games depiciting direct killing of humans. This is nothing new.

    17. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, authoritarians on all sides. Sucks to be a normal person who just wants to be free.

      Freedom has been taken for granted many places in the world for a few generations. We're probably overdue our cheque. The bill will probably be another generation of young people losing their lives.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    18. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a human right to exploit children, and I suspect that's what this is about. If only adults played games, non issue. Video games can be addictive, this is not up for debate. We generally try to steer children away from addictive behaviors in their formative years. No different to the loot box ban propositions.

    19. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm off the mark, but I think their concerns are less to do with how mindless or slacking culture it might be, and more about little psychological tricks used to keep people playing. While a ban is heavy handed, at the very least, games need to be put under the spotlight for this (as do social media platforms).

    20. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing new.

      Traditionally, shitty countries pretending the past never happened had their version of the game censored. Nowadays? China's bullshit results in changes affecting the rest of the worlds' players.

    21. Re: Maybe they are right this time by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      They made SimAnt already, it didn't do so hot in the market.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    22. Re: Maybe they are right this time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Banning loot boxes and prohibiting sales to minors are proportionate measures. So are PG ratings that help parents decide what is right for their kids and what isn't. An outright ban is not.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    23. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, you get censorship almost everywhere, unless the game was aimed at the market to begin with.
      That is the main reason to why they don't have to censor games for the US market.
      The nudity is removed before getting funding from the publisher, not after the game is done and they are expanding the countries where it is available.

    24. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't FPS games.

    25. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Is it though. It's not that different to burning books, and as the saying goes "where you burn books on Monday you burn people on Tuesday". Or something like that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    26. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people wonder why the anti-globalists are only getting louder.

    27. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I see how crazily obsessed children are with Fortnite, when I see some adults here, comparing a Fortnite ban to human rights violation, it makes me think that maybe banning this shit would be a good thing.

      GROW. UP.

      (And if we have to talk about what china are doing, let's talk about their violations of human rights)

      Being able to do what you want with your free time if it doesn't negatively impact others rights is a basic human right. Slavery is nothing less than mandating what someone does with their time on earth. This is most certainly a violation of human rights and it follows the same destructive pattern of barbaric busy body laws that are almost always looked upon in disfavour in hindsight. At the core China is restricting how someone derives pleasure when it negatively impacts no one else because they just don't like it. Some parallels would be banning homosexuality, setting up curfews, mandating the worship of one religion ect..These are all examples of people doing things in their free time that DO NOT CONCERN you or the government. Play the "grow up" card all you want but we both know that is not an argument. Also know that these kids will most certainly grow up and be the ones forming future policies that effect you. Will you complain when they ban that which you derive please from with the justification of "get with the times you old fart".

      Disclaimer: I do not play any of the games listed as they are massively annoying.

    28. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Yes, censorship is completely unrelated to human rights.

    29. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out who owns some of the film production companies and then review the films they are releasing. You may be shocked how many are already "edited" for China.

    30. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, authoritarians on all sides. Sucks to be a normal person who just wants to be free.

      Freedom has been taken for granted many places in the world for a few generations. We're probably overdue our cheque. The bill will probably be another generation of young people losing their lives.

      The problem is that it isn't governments or corporations that are taking freedom away.
      It is technology.

      It matters not which party you vote in, or even whether you can vote.
      Whoever is in power is going to use technology to tighten the screws.
      There really is nothing we can do about that.

    31. Re:Maybe they are right this time by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Let me quote the obligatory: Freedom is nor free

    32. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, last I heard it cost $1.05, but of course with inflation and the relative value of modern lazy teenagers vs our hardworking grandparents generation and I think freedom probably costs closer to $26.12 now and doesn't come with batteries.

    33. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Tadlon · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension is super important. He is saying studios here will build their games from the start to comply with what the Chinese market requires thus dictating games here.

    34. Re:Maybe they are right this time by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Anti-globalists wouldn't have many video games to play at all. Or any hardware to play them on.

    35. Re:Maybe they are right this time by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So does this mean American getting a taste of their own medicine? The rest of the world has had to put up with their cultural influence pushing their weirdo values for decades. Now we get Chinese weirdo values instead.

    36. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      So does this mean American getting a taste of their own medicine? The rest of the world has had to put up with their cultural influence pushing their weirdo values for decades. Now we get Chinese weirdo values instead.

      In a way, yes; but surely you would have to agree that the Chinese government's control and influence is not something we would want anywhere in the West? As bad as America may have seemed to you and your country, would you prefer a totalitarian state passing their values around instead?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. CCP MO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MO of the CCP is to protect the CCP first and foremost. The entire planet is expendable to that endeavor and end.

    Every move by the Chinese gov is ancillary. Just ask the ministry of culture.

  6. And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing of value was lost.

  7. Do you see now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Someone suggested in the last thread on this subject that China should be lauded for trying to do something about this issue even if they are failing at other issues. I said it was hypocritical bullshit and they deserved zero praise for it. Today we see that I was 100% correct. Once PUBG and Battlegrounds were included it proved that this was not about protecting citizens, but about crushing competition. Shame on you if you thought otherwise.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Do you see now? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      PUBG is from Tencent which is a Chinese company, so they are banning a game that makes money from around the world to bring into the Chinese economy. Interesting that they would make this move that hurts a Chinese company as well as it's non-Chinese competitor. It almost seems they did this more based on other factors.

    2. Re:Do you see now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It almost seems they did this more based on other factors.

      You can be sure that the other factors are also economic, but relate to bribery and not profit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Do you see now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article was very thing and didn't say what content was cut but when games have been changed in China because of "controversial content" historically it has been because they have a cultural thing about depicting skeletons among other things.
      While the anti-Chinese circle-jerk is fun and all it is very likely that this is very similar to games not having swastikas in the German edition or boobs being censored in the US version.

      I doubt any of the listed games have any Winnie the Pooh-skins that needed to be removed.
      If they had then Disney would have already required the removal long ago.

    4. Re: Do you see now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It almost seems like the OP had no idea what he was talking about

    5. Re:Do you see now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that Fortnite producer Epic is in part owned by Tencent also (who handles the China version of the game if I remember correctly).

    6. Re: Do you see now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUL.

        Fuck off china shill.

      I see boobs in video games all the time in America.

  8. Build a (fire)wall around china by geekymachoman · · Score: 2

    Cut them off. Spare them the trouble of sifting through content and them deciding what should be allowed and what not. Maybe their citizens start rebelling then, but probably not, so just keep it up.

    1. Re:Build a (fire)wall around china by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But who's gonna build all our crap then? India? Do you really want that? Product and support, all in one hand?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Build a (fire)wall around china by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Cut them off.

      Will you pay for the lost income?

  9. Re: B-but socialism iz gud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been banning games for a long time, just informally. Started with spy hunter and pole position a long time ago, they even banned subway surfer and 2048 because it took up too much of childrens time

  10. You Go Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LITERALLY!

  11. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Panda-ring? Haha thatâ(TM)s funny. The Chinese are very easy to understand. They just want their kids learning violin and ping pong and whatever and not spending their time playing mindless or violent games or hanging out on street corners meeting drug dealers. Come to think of it, this is how it was in the US when I grew up

  12. I wonder if they'll have to "update" Civilization by supremebob · · Score: 2

    I mean, how dare Firaxis not make the Chinese military units in Civilization more powerful than everyone else. They need to update that game for the Chinese market, so whoever plays that character always wins!

  13. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What does China have to do with socialism?

    In the international name-and-blame game, what you call yourself matters jack shit. The GDR was the German Democratic Republic. So? It was neither democratic nor a republic. And considering how they speak in those areas of Germany, even the German is something that I'd consider debatable.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Re:we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has t by Holi · · Score: 1

    Why? because they don't want to sell a couple of video games in their country?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  15. Re:Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You tell those big studios that they should ignore a market the size of the US, Japan and Europe combined. Make a video, their reaction should be priceless. I bet it goes viral.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. You 'Muricans are funny by pablo_max · · Score: 0

    I love to read these posts from Holier than thou 'Muricans preaching to the rest of us. Oh how you love to point the finger, don't you?
    I seem to recall, quite recently in your past in fact, y'all committing crimes against humanity. Japanese prison camps anyone?
    Torture at GitMo anyone? Starting the conflict in Syria then acting like you're good guys? Iraq? Iran? Afghanistan? You just love to stir shit up break things and then tell everyone else how shitty they are.

    BTW, I am not sure if you know this, but Germany often bans games containing Nazis. Shall we "build a wall" around them?
    You trumpkins and your fucking walls.

    Since you're 'Murican and lack critical thinking skills, consider that is known by everyone else... closing off exposure to western culture is actually NOT the way to influence change within a tightly controlled regime.

    1. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

      When you step down off your soap box, you should look to your own critical thinking skills, and look up Whataboutism.

    2. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We voted Trump in to stop that nonsense. The only attack he started was an airfield strike in Syria after they used chemical weapons against citizens. I agreed with that, not sure your view on it.

      Many of the other things you mention Trump has been making effort to end and not escalate. By this time in his presidency, Obama was starting new wars, drone attacks on US citizens without trial, and shipping thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels. I think we have improved greatly in the last couple years.

    3. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing but lime jello.....I just wish you had told us what has-been country you hail from.

    4. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      And while you're thinking about improving your critical thinking skills and learning what "whataboutism" is, why don't you also go realize that our goverment officials really don't represent the people very well. Classifying Americans into a group like you are is exactly like saying the Chinese government represents the will of the people there. It'd be very very wrong.

    5. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but said government officials were democratically elected, did they not? Or at the very least appointed by leadership figures that were indeed democratically elected. So yes, the American populace, or at least a significant majority, does have the blame in this case.

    6. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you...you don't honestly believe that do you?

    7. Re: You 'Muricans are funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sides are very good at whataboutism.

    8. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      hahaha... Classic 'Murican. Says the representative government that he voted for is not a reflection of the people.
      That is EXACTLY what it is. If you keep electing asshats... well.. you're an asshat, asshat.

  17. A closed society go figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is a country not open to free speech or anything that may loosen its control over its people. This is why a company like Google should not be doing any significant collaborations with China on anything. I think companies tend to choose money over ethics and moral conviction with China. Companies like GM, Google, Apple all cave to creating business in China for the sake of profits.

  18. Re: we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually let's ban the Olympics. It is an environmental disaster, a drain on economic resources, and (generally) a shrine to chemically enhanced human performance.

    The bloated and self-serving IOC bureaucracy exists to provide an opulent lifestyle for themselves under the feel good of aegis of promoting global unity through athletics, which they really don't care about.

  19. I’m American, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally support this. While I don’t think video games make individuals violent, they maintain the normalization of violence within our culture. The violent language men use to talk to each other. The violence we accept from the state on our own citizens. The violence we accept from our military on civilians abroad. I think part of the reason violent video games are so appealing is they help us process the reality of the system we live in, but by making systemic violence more palatable we also enable it to continue.

    1. Re: I’m American, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that boot taste?

      Also I doubt you are American/

  20. It's Their Foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how are Chinese teams able to win Overwatch World Cup in the future if new Chinese players get a modified version of the game? It will be like modifying published science for political or religious reasons and then complaining about the lack of progress.

    1. Re:It's Their Foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the Overwatch game mechanics the Chinese officials appear to have issues with.
      It's some visuals promoting incorrect values and toxic chatrooms according to that reddit link.
      In this particular case both could be altered in a way that allows people to still essentially play the same game.
      They most likely have issues with all the female characters in the game being depicted as being too 'sexy' for their moral values.
      Maybe they will get different character textures, stuff like different victory dances, maybe altered models (which have no effect on the actual hitboxes).

    2. Re:It's Their Foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games made with the art style of socialist realism would be an interesting experiment. I wonder if any currently official censor in this world have anything to say about that. Those games would probably have to rely on the story to cause the familiar tingle between the legs, or to get those juices flowing.

    3. Re:It's Their Foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd also like to see a video game which promotes those correct values made by a Chinese government institution.
      Although I firmly believe that they do not like video games as a whole. They'd rather not have their citizens playing 'games' but making profit for the state through physical or mental labour.

  21. nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff

    1. Re:nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I get all my illegal drugs from there!

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    2. Re:nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada we get your illegal drugs from a store.

  22. Re:Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Holi · · Score: 1

    " long after China is but an unpleasant memory."

    Says the youngest culture to one of the oldest cultures on earth.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  23. Corrective Action? by magical+liopleurodon · · Score: 1

    NERF BASTION!

  24. Re:I wonder if they'll have to "update" Civilizati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already did this to the board game version. In that game, the leader of China (Mao) was changed to someone else, because Mao can't be in a game he could potentially lose.

  25. It's about the comercial balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that this is more about blocking the transfer of money away from china to western economies than the violence in the games.

    1. Re: It's about the comercial balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tencent has a 40% stake in fortnite. Time for a new theory.

  26. The Fortnite ban is somewhat surprising by atrex · · Score: 1

    Fortnite being produced by Epic Games, which is 40% owned by Chinese Tencent, I'm a little surprised at the Fortnite ban. I guess "fantasy violence" they're ok with, but anything with "normal" guns must be a no-no.

  27. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does China have to do with socialism?

    Damn dude are you really that stupid? You should change your name to Obtuse. This action is taken by the very definition of socialist - controlling what people can do and think to make a harmonious and equal culture. No independent thought allowed.

  28. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been playing all sorts of video games since I was 7 and got my Atari 2600. Some of those games were mindless, and others took some thought. I had a guitar that I gave up on rather quickly. I stayed away from street corners and drugs. All that led me to my career in IT. It probably helped that my next gaming system was a Commodore 64, and after that an Amiga 500. Perhaps it would be better to give the kids a computer, rather than give them a game console.

  29. If addiction is a concern by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems China has the same issues the United States has in that folks with kiddos either:

    1) Don't know how or
    2) Don't want to be bothered

    with actually being a parent.

    The simple fix for that Fortnite addiction is to simply not allow them to play it for excessive amounts of time.

    You know. . . . BE a parent.

    1. Re:If addiction is a concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem.

      China's Citizenship Monitoring program will do just that.

      Too much Video Game time will lower your Score so you'll have a harder time travelling, etc. That should slowly push people to do away or limit those sorts of things (or just push it all into an underground culture, which is my expectation).

    2. Re:If addiction is a concern by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Be a parent? HAha, no, that's the government's job dumbass.

  30. China, You backed your asinine government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck trying to play any decent video game. Or get arrested for playing it via VPN.

    You backed your government. It's your turn to fuck yourself.

  31. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a winning proposition. You'll end up pleasing the wrong person and not your core audience.

    It is easy to post games off, what with Artifact, Fallout 76 and Battlefield V. Unless these studios really want to lose money and gamers, they better focus on making better games.

  32. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's fascism, not socialism.

  33. Banning American Games! Free Trade my ASS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump needs to FUCK these assholes UP!

  34. Maybe.. by CptLoRes · · Score: 0

    This will be the final straw that sparks a peoples revolution in China? I have a suspicion the government dosent fully understand just how important games can be to the younger generations.

  35. Insidious effect of Chinese government control by sinequonon · · Score: 1

    My concern is that Chinese censorship will end up restricting what is available for the remainder of the world. It's going to be a growing, insidious problem that will hamper most forms of media.

    --
    -Bob-
    1. Re:Insidious effect of Chinese government control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll only happen for major media companies who are more interested in making profits than art. Just stop buying crap from those companies and learn to appreciate indie artists. There's just as much of a ratio of good to shit as there is within the realm of works produced by billionaire studios, but at least indie artists are more likely to seek fan approval over government approval. Also, less DRM.

      If you're into video games, music, film, any form of entertainment, really, vote with your dollar and stop buying products from companies that capitulate to Chinese censorship. Yes, it takes more work to find out what's out there, you can't just rely on media advertisements bombarding you with suggestions of what to buy next, but the extra time you take to research your entertainment will be worth it.

  36. Time to play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtual Tiananmen square! Avoid the tanks, shelter Muslims and practice Falun Gong. For bonus points, piss on Mao! Invite your friends and challenge your family. No better way to save face while promoting intergenerational unity. It's even more fun than Pokémon Go (besides, what do Japanese know).

  37. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    This is authoritarianism. Usually it's associated with dictatorships or other forms of oppressive government, and yes, that can be socialist. But it can just as well be fascist. Or a theocracy.

    But that's not what you need to hear, right? You're one of those people who label everything you don't like in a country "socialist", right? Oppression of opposition? Socialist. No free press? Socialist. People "disappearing" after a visit from some guys in black trenchcoats? Socialist. Being arrested for "reeducation" if you criticize the government? Socialist.

    I'm pretty sure you're even one of those dimwits that will claim the NSDAP was a socialist party because it had "social" in its name. And it did all those things! See? The definition is true!

    Right?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. On Board by ememisya · · Score: 2

    Banning Fortnite? For once I'm not mad at China.

    1. Re:On Board by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      For once I'm not mad at China.

      And the Chinese communist party's next demand will be censoring you on every platform connected to any kind of public network for bring up their crimes. After that they'll demand you to be given no credit at the bank and no access to air-travel or trains.

    2. Re:On Board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have your chronological order wrong, this happened already.

  39. Animes too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a list of 38 animes that are banned too, some of them good.
    The funny thing is, they arent that questionable, not too much violence of sex or anything.
    Except, the protagonists eventually go against a central authority figure or group! THAT is what they are afraid of!
    CAPTCHA: "dissent", how apt!

  40. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    One should hope so, but people keep preordering them like they can't learn from previous blunders. Fallout76 had one of the highest preorder rates ever. Yes, sales plummeted right after it got out the door, but who gives a fuck? Preorder sales easily pick up the slack.

    And people will keep preordering. Know why? Because they get that exclusive preorder skin for their puppy and the exclusive preorder emote for the multiplayer game that makes them so SPECIAL!

    So who gives a fuck whether they actually play it after they already bought it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Did anyone actually RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Out of all of the comments here, none of them actually discuss some of the reasons that these games are up for review.

    Notably, one of those reasons, would make Slashdot fall of the face of China: "Inharmonious chat"

    Actually, this is a VERY legitimate reason for reform in the gaming community and on the internet in general. A lot of games fail because their communities are full of toxic players and that's becoming pretty much the bane of the internet these days. Anyone comparing Slashdot from 15 years ago to now, refers to the same thing, lack of moderation (self moderation?) and the allowing of trolls and toxic opinions to be flooding the comments section, it's no different in gaming. People got used to not being idiots fearing violence or being outcast from society but that disappeared with the age of the internet. China, taking aim on Gaming, will draw ire from the gaming community and the "inharmonious" groups that voice their opinions and only that, but honestly? They're the pioneers of making the internet great again (sorry for the pun) by holding gaming companies accountable for the toxic group of people playing those games. Holy Crap! That's awesome!

    How can we further support this cause?

    1. Re: Did anyone actually RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have chat filters for a reason.

      If your snowflake eyes don't like seeing bad words, then use the censor chat feature.

      Stop trying to censor everyone.

    2. Re: Did anyone actually RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have chat filters for a reason.

      If your snowflake eyes don't like seeing bad words, then use the censor chat feature.

      Stop trying to censor everyone.

      It's sad but it doesn't appear like you know the definition of inharmonious.

      For today's lesson, your comment is considered to be inharmonious and serves no other point than to flame one person's opinion with a direct order to stop doing something to everyone that supposedly shares your opinion. This is the actual ideology that they're cracking down on.

      You'd be surprised at how more enjoyable and rewarding any online community with user contribution can be if it's done with good manners and decent opinions.

    3. Re:Did anyone actually RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They're the pioneers of making the internet great again (sorry for the pun)

      That's not a pun, you dumb Chinese shill. You also don't seem to grasp what they mean when they say "inharmonious". Here's a hint: it's not *really* about people being nice to each other, it's about enforcing the party bullshit.

  42. they should have done Volkswagen! by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    Application should detect if game is the under test and display teletubbies. Once player takes over - go full nine yeards.

  43. what about Tetris? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    It teaches you how to think. Flying sticks - verry violent. You can cheat - fraud. Phallic objects - sexual content. Don't even get me started that you are controlling game play not the government.

  44. I see what you are getting at... however by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I know where you are coming from as I know kids of friends who are generally good but have had to have some punishments applied because Fortnite drove them to some sneakiness to get around parent imposed rules.

    But it seems to me that maybe this is useful, to have a real test of moral character around that can be used to temper otherwise soft individuals. It seems hard to even punish a kid these days, but no Fortnite for week or so is something that means something.

    I've played Fortnite myself a bit, off and on - there's nothing inherently addictive, it's just got a good combination of latent story, gameplay, dance, and humor.

    If kids are exposed to something this powerfully compelling early on, it would give them a lot of willpower later to resist other temptations.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and those exclusive preorder Canvas ... I mean Vinyl ... rucksack (although props to Bethesda for owning up finally and agreeing to make the Canvas version they actually advertised).

  46. Re:we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has t by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Olympic committee just rejected E-sports. Ban olympics by your logic?

  47. Gov Controlled IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is *exactly* what happens when you allow the government to control IT related things. And people still fight for net neutrality, giving the USA government control of the internet? I can already see the "banned" site list growing exponentially. And the gov will base all its banning sites off SJW influences (and whining).

    Yes, yes, I know giving control to the likes of Comcast and other corporations is not better, AT ALL.

    We need a true neutral third option, where no one controls it.

    1. Re: Gov Controlled IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how net neutrality works you cuck.

      And if you knew better, you would know that net neutrality actually PROTECTS you from those things you fear most.

      But that doesn't fit your agenda now does it?

  48. Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG by t0qer · · Score: 1

    >Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG

    Sweet! No more Chinese screaming, "CHINAH NUMBAH ONE!" in pubg voice.

  49. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    props for doing what they should've done in the first place?

  50. USA is a plutocracy and the rich don't go to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst industrial disaster in history is the Bhopal disaster caused by Union Carbide, now a fully-owned subsidiary of Dow Chemical. Around 4,000 people died instantly, and ~ 500,000 people were injured. This is higher casualty than all the “chemical warfare” in the Middle East combined. After 5 years of litigation, Union Carbide paid $470 million to settle the case. UCC Chairman Warren Anderson was flown out of India immediately, and none of the UCC American owners and corporate officers have ever spent a day in jail.

    The worst environmental disaster in history is the Exxon Valdez oil spill. 35,000 tons of oil was released close to the coastal habitat of salmon, otters, seals, and seabirds, covering 1,300 miles of coastline and 11,000 square miles of ocean. 22 orcas, 3,000 sea otters, a quarter million sea birds were wiped out. After 20 years of litigation, Exxon paid ~ $500 million in punitive damages. The boat captain got community service. None of the Exxon executives has ever spent a day in jail.

    The worst financial disaster since the Great Depression is the Financial crisis of 2007–2008. Triggered by the subprime mortgage collapse in the US, DJI dropped from a high of ~ 14,000 to a trough of 6,600. The financial crisis spreat from the US to the rest of the world, wiped out an estimated $2.8 trillion from financial institutions, of which, about $1 trillion came from the US banks, and the rest from Europe and Asia. Most countries in the world have still not recovered to this day, but Wall Street was awarded $700 billion bailout immediately. Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 None of the Wall Street bankers has ever seen a day in jail.

  51. Big brother deems your game ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... doubleplusungood. Comply in shutting them down, adjusting them according to the standards of the ministry of love or be collected for immediate recycling at the biomatter tanks in your district.

    Thank you for your cooperation citizen. And remember: Big Mao is watching you.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  52. The chinese are so oppressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They cant play video games, or have religion. Their government blatantly abuses its citizens and breaks their constitution. I'd love to see a revolution there where the people rose up and thier leaders. It would be marvellous to see. Alas, Chinese people are too meek and dumb to figure out their own oppression.

  53. If you censor for China.... by DewDude · · Score: 1

    You'll have to start censoring for everyone....and I have a pretty damn good feeling plenty of people here...who already don't give a fuck about freedom of expression; would be more than willing to put the screws to these companies.

    It's better to maintain your integrity, stand behind your product, and tell China to go fuck itself.


    But the problem is money talks...and it's become more and more clear that game publishers don't really give two shits about what gamers want...they just want money.

    This is the end of the gaming industry. In a few years everyone will be demanding censorship and all we'll be able to do is look back at the great games we once had.

  54. Andrew Lawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not know about you, but I really like PUBG. Great game made. Guys, recommended a gambling website gambling website where you can play online games like poker, roulette and blackjack.