Slashdot Mirror


China To Force Changes To 20 Popular Games, Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: A panel of censors set up to vet mobile video games in China has signaled it will be hard to please. State media reports that of the first 20 titles it assessed, nine were refused permission to go on sale. The Xinhua news agency added that developers of the other 11 had been told they had to make adjustments to remove "controversial content." The authorities have voiced concerns about the violent nature of some titles as well as worries about the activity being addictive.

It was announced in August that a new body -- the State Administration of Press and Publications -- had taken over responsibility for approving games and that it would limit the number of online titles available. And although it has not been specified, some experts are assuming that the new panel will operate under its auspices. Xinhua said it is comprised of gaming experts, government-employed researchers, and representatives from the media and video games industry. But it provided no other information about who they were or the titles they had already examined.
UPDATE: The list of games being examined by the ethics panel has been revealed by users on NGA, a Chinese gaming forum. A number of games, such as League of Legends, Overwatch, Diablo, and World of Warcraft, will need "corrective action," while others will be "banned/withdrawn" entirely. Some of the most popular prohibited titles include Fortnite and PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).

89 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Don't Sell to China... by Zurkeyon3733 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Sell them NOTHING. Change NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

    1. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

    2. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some pinko lefty?!

      The pinko lefties are cheering for censorship these days. They've been crusading against women showing any kind of skin harder than ISIS.

    3. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But ... but ... but profit! Why do you hate capitalism?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      Terrible, barbaric, tyrannical governments that censor every little thing, should be CUT OFF FROM THE WORLD. Sell them NOTHING. Change NOTHING for them. Tell them take it or LEAVE it.

      They outnumber us, and, well... the entire Western World. We don't cut them off from the world... they cut us off. If they ever come close to parity for production/earnings as the West they would easily be able to dominate the world. It's a shame about their government choice, for sure. I wish India would hurry up and modernize their economy and get to Western standards. Politically India is closer to the West in ideals and outlook. I'd much rather them dominate the world than China.

      Just like the US has been able to enforce it's will around the globe for the last 80 years- give it a generation and China will be doing that. I don't like the sound of China modeling the world in it's image.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

      It is harder to organize dissent when everything you do is tracked and recorded. Not saying it won't happen, but it's a lot harder to organize a protest now than it was in the 1980's.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right. Just like how movies teach you how to use firearms. The 'survival' skills you learn in these games will get you killed in about 10 seconds flat in the real world. Turns out that in the real world, getting shot 5 times can't be fixed by wrapping some bandages around your arm or taking some pain pills. You'll just be dead. And you can't just join the next game 90 seconds later.

    7. Re:Don't Sell to China... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Middle-class Chinese are traveling a lot these days. Let tourists discover what despite their new prosperity they can no longer have at home.

      It is harder to organize dissent when everything you do is tracked and recorded. Not saying it won't happen, but it's a lot harder to organize a protest now than it was in the 1980's.

      They'll start doing it on holiday before their gov cracks down on foreign holidays.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    8. Re:Don't Sell to China... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Video games are escapism from reality. It seems facetious to complain about a scantily-clad female for a fantasy but not brutal killing with giblets.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    9. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 2

      The notion is that videogame characters ...

      It's doesn't matter what the "notion" is. To Hell with any group pushing for censorship of any legal entertainment content. The censorious part of the left is every bit as bad as the right-wing religious whackos. A pox on both their houses.

      We can do without moral scolds of any variety.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 1

      If they ever come close to parity for production/earnings as the West they would easily be able to dominate the world. It's a shame about their government choice, for sure.

      They did not choose their government, and they'll never come close to us in terms of productivity per capita, because totalitarian regimes never do. You don't get much economic growth without freedom. China coasts on off-shored manufacturing and stolen innovation, but has very little non-export economy. There are a few tech companies like TenCent that have done a little on their own, but that's a tiny part of an economy (and they, too, got hit by this censorship).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Don't Sell to China... by NettiWelho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll start doing it on holiday before their gov cracks down on foreign holidays.

      The new social credit score system keeps the ones in the country who might be interested in such things. Disagreeing with government bans you from using any kind of mass transit, loan or even your kids access to school.

    12. Re:Don't Sell to China... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sure, it would be nice to push the boundary the other way, but preventing new things from being legally censored would at least be something! (Actually, there's very little in the US that's legally blocked, most of the effective censorship is by the distribution companies. Kudos to Steam for recently changing to allow adult content. Tumblr OTOH ...)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Don't Sell to China... by times05 · · Score: 1

      "they'll never come close to us in terms of productivity per capita". What a load arrogant BS. You really think you are so much more productive and creative that they'll never come close to you??? lol

      I don't care what country you live in, doesn't matter, it's not a true democracy anyway. You also have to be deluded to think that China is totalitarian. Surprise!!! There's millions of people involved in their "totalitarian" government making all kinds of decisions on all levels. Just like yours, wherever you're from. Had you been born Chinese you'd have about the same chance of having equal amount of input on how your government runs and its policy as you do right now, whatever country you are from. On the average it's next to no input at all.

    14. Re:Don't Sell to China... by The+Snazster · · Score: 1

      The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.

    15. Re:Don't Sell to China... by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

      Well given the choice between the two countries, I'm sure glad I was born in America. Problems and all.

    16. Re:Don't Sell to China... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I note the confusion in your comment, it is bad to censor legal content, wait what?!? It is illegal because it was censored, so legal content has passed censorship, this with no claim of what is good or bad content, just that censorship is there already. So where will China draw the line, well, where ever it's people accept the line being drawn. Personally I hold with, you want government to provide you copyright protection as in censor, actively and viscously censor (arrest is not a fun process) that distribution of content by others, well, your content should pass a censorship board to test whether or not it is off sufficient social value to provide it copyright protection.

      See right there, the glaring blind ignorance in the censorship argument, censorship already occurs upon a mass scale, with prison sentences, violent raids, all at huge public expense, it's called copyright which is modern reality is more like copywrong due to the level of corruption in it's expansion and penalties. Oh the blindness of ideologues. Ahh censorship we like and censorship we don't like, interesting, apparently the difference how it suits their personal greed and nothing what so ever to do with morality, well, beyond it being immoral to deny them infinite wealth.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:Don't Sell to China... by ReneR · · Score: 1

      Funny, I think you mixed China with USA there,

  2. we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has that by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has that power

  3. Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I see how crazily obsessed children are with Fortnite, when I see some adults here, comparing a Fortnite ban to human rights violation, it makes me think that maybe banning this shit would be a good thing.

    GROW. UP.

    (And if we have to talk about what china are doing, let's talk about their violations of human rights)

    1. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, I could see a Chinese made Sim Concentration Camp being a big hit. It's educational.

      NPC

    2. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Man, authoritarians on all sides. Sucks to be a normal person who just wants to be free.

    3. Re:Maybe they are right this time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you are talking in terms of "they are right this time", i.e. "I'm against banning things... except the stuff I don't like", then perhaps you need to read up a bit about what human rights are and why we have them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't care about video games. What do you care about? Movies? Sports? What do you do when you have time off and want to relax, unwind and have a good time?

      Video games are, like all software, a product with a huge up front and a very tiny per-unit cost. In other words, your goal is to sell as many as possible, even more so than with any other product. Every unit sold, no matter how low the price, is higher than the cost per unit, so it counts towards profit.

      There is now a huge market in China. Nowhere in the world, the middle class grows as quickly as there. They not only want but they also do buy games. You want to cater to that market as a game producers.

      And since it's unlikely that we will get another version of the game out here in the "free" world, any ban, any limitation of speech, issued and enforced in China literally has an effect on us over here, too.

      Even if you don't give a fuck about human rights in China, this isn't about China alone. It's about China dictating what kind of entertainment will be produced for you, too.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Holi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      OK, comparing a fucking video game ban to human rights violations is fucking ridiculous.

      "It's about China dictating what kind of entertainment will be produced for you"

      Really? how many video games are produced in China that make it to the world market?

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    6. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Let's wait and see. The problem is that China is simply such a huge market that if they can land a hit in China, this would easily pick up the slack even if they totally bombed in the US and Europe.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many Hollywood movies now contain shoe horned in Chinese actors? Rogue One is one example. The flopped Independence day sequel os another. Yeah, it will never happen.

    8. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I see how crazily obsessed children are with Fortnite, when I see some adults here, comparing a Fortnite ban to human rights violation, it makes me think that maybe banning this shit would be a good thing.

      I hate Fortnight and PUBG and that whole genre of FPS games too!

      That's not what the worry is about, the worry is about yet another form of censorship from the world's largest market that will have impacts on us. It's getting to the point that what happens in China matters for the rest of the world. Just like people all over the world watch the American elections and dread which nincompoop gets elected this time, we're all going to start paying attention to China more- what China says and does has ripple effects throughout the world. Any move from China in the wrong direction means (in this global era) that it will impact what we have access to. And yes, Fortnight might be ridiculous crap, but even if you're more highbrow, your opera might be next, the ending has to change, or your films (no Asian allowed to be depicted as a villain- no capitalist or democratic sentiment in films).

      China is big enough now that the problems of China's citizens are our problems.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IN China? Very few. FOR China? Very many.

      China is a huge market. And unlike the Euro/US market it is growing, rapidly so. And a market that the big studios still don't sell well in.

      Fanboys will gobble up next year's "Generic Game Title 19". They have shown time and again that they will, no matter whether the game is any good. They buy it. And defend it tooth and nail against anyone pointing out that the quality has been deteriorating for years. They will buy GGT19 even if it's a weak port of a phone game (because phone games is what sells in China).

      But the Chinese will only buy GGT19 if it's a phone game.

      So take a wild guess what GGT19 will be.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      When did I ever say I am against banning things? Human rights are NOT about allowing us to buy everything we want like spoiled children. In fact, we trample over the human rights of others, just to buy things cheaper.

    11. Re:Maybe they are right this time by lucasnate1 · · Score: 1

      Europe also had a lot of video game censorship, see things like "contra" becoming "probotector" because of the ban on games depiciting direct killing of humans. This is nothing new.

    12. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, authoritarians on all sides. Sucks to be a normal person who just wants to be free.

      Freedom has been taken for granted many places in the world for a few generations. We're probably overdue our cheque. The bill will probably be another generation of young people losing their lives.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    13. Re: Maybe they are right this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm off the mark, but I think their concerns are less to do with how mindless or slacking culture it might be, and more about little psychological tricks used to keep people playing. While a ban is heavy handed, at the very least, games need to be put under the spotlight for this (as do social media platforms).

    14. Re: Maybe they are right this time by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      They made SimAnt already, it didn't do so hot in the market.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    15. Re: Maybe they are right this time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Banning loot boxes and prohibiting sales to minors are proportionate measures. So are PG ratings that help parents decide what is right for their kids and what isn't. An outright ban is not.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    16. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Is it though. It's not that different to burning books, and as the saying goes "where you burn books on Monday you burn people on Tuesday". Or something like that.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Yes, censorship is completely unrelated to human rights.

    18. Re:Maybe they are right this time by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Let me quote the obligatory: Freedom is nor free

    19. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Tadlon · · Score: 1

      Reading comprehension is super important. He is saying studios here will build their games from the start to comply with what the Chinese market requires thus dictating games here.

    20. Re:Maybe they are right this time by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Anti-globalists wouldn't have many video games to play at all. Or any hardware to play them on.

    21. Re:Maybe they are right this time by drsquare · · Score: 1

      So does this mean American getting a taste of their own medicine? The rest of the world has had to put up with their cultural influence pushing their weirdo values for decades. Now we get Chinese weirdo values instead.

    22. Re:Maybe they are right this time by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      So does this mean American getting a taste of their own medicine? The rest of the world has had to put up with their cultural influence pushing their weirdo values for decades. Now we get Chinese weirdo values instead.

      In a way, yes; but surely you would have to agree that the Chinese government's control and influence is not something we would want anywhere in the West? As bad as America may have seemed to you and your country, would you prefer a totalitarian state passing their values around instead?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Do you see now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Someone suggested in the last thread on this subject that China should be lauded for trying to do something about this issue even if they are failing at other issues. I said it was hypocritical bullshit and they deserved zero praise for it. Today we see that I was 100% correct. Once PUBG and Battlegrounds were included it proved that this was not about protecting citizens, but about crushing competition. Shame on you if you thought otherwise.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Do you see now? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      PUBG is from Tencent which is a Chinese company, so they are banning a game that makes money from around the world to bring into the Chinese economy. Interesting that they would make this move that hurts a Chinese company as well as it's non-Chinese competitor. It almost seems they did this more based on other factors.

    2. Re:Do you see now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It almost seems they did this more based on other factors.

      You can be sure that the other factors are also economic, but relate to bribery and not profit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Build a (fire)wall around china by geekymachoman · · Score: 2

    Cut them off. Spare them the trouble of sifting through content and them deciding what should be allowed and what not. Maybe their citizens start rebelling then, but probably not, so just keep it up.

    1. Re:Build a (fire)wall around china by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But who's gonna build all our crap then? India? Do you really want that? Product and support, all in one hand?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Build a (fire)wall around china by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Cut them off.

      Will you pay for the lost income?

  6. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Everyone playing games does.

    China is a HUGE market. If anything, that Diablo immoral (or whatever that installment was called) makes it evident. Studios bend over backwards to cater to the Chinese market.

    Think your games will remain as they are? Think again. They know you'll buy the next Call of Battlefield anyway, even if it's a dumbed down phone minigame with microtransactions up the ass. They want that Chinese market.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. I wonder if they'll have to "update" Civilization by supremebob · · Score: 2

    I mean, how dare Firaxis not make the Chinese military units in Civilization more powerful than everyone else. They need to update that game for the Chinese market, so whoever plays that character always wins!

  8. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What does China have to do with socialism?

    In the international name-and-blame game, what you call yourself matters jack shit. The GDR was the German Democratic Republic. So? It was neither democratic nor a republic. And considering how they speak in those areas of Germany, even the German is something that I'd consider debatable.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has t by Holi · · Score: 1

    Why? because they don't want to sell a couple of video games in their country?

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  10. Re:Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You tell those big studios that they should ignore a market the size of the US, Japan and Europe combined. Make a video, their reaction should be priceless. I bet it goes viral.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2

    Think your games will remain as they are? Think again.

    Or they can simply modify the edition the Chinese get. IIRC, Bungie had to make modifications to Myth for the European market, because some countries had a thing against blood in games, so they made the blood green. I think they also made enemies that exploded turn into confetti instead of a pile of carnage, but that might have been another game. I think Wolfenstein had to do the same thing in Germany because of the swastikas. Sure, it's probably a pain in the neck, but it can be done.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  12. nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff

    1. Re:nafta 2.0 = Mexico is back to making stuff by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I get all my illegal drugs from there!

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  13. Re:Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Holi · · Score: 1

    " long after China is but an unpleasant memory."

    Says the youngest culture to one of the oldest cultures on earth.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  14. Corrective Action? by magical+liopleurodon · · Score: 1

    NERF BASTION!

  15. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

    When you step down off your soap box, you should look to your own critical thinking skills, and look up Whataboutism.

  16. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, Germany has a stream of bullshit changes to pander to their ridiculous Bundesprüfstelle to defend kids against reality (IIRC that's the most accurate translation), and in general they were hilarious. Top of my head I remember the suicide bombers in C&C Generals being gurneys with little bombs on them. But that's far from the most ridiculous change ever made in a game to get an a-ok from them.

    But we're not talking about cosmetic changes here. If you look at the reasons given as to why the games were banned, including reasons like "rewards given based on rank", "distorted concepts of history and culture" and "game missions include fraud", this means that fundamental aspects of the game, its core mechanics and the story it tries to tell, are suddenly no-gos.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  17. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Or they can simply modify the edition the Chinese get. IIRC, Bungie had to make modifications to Myth for the European market, because some countries had a thing against blood in games, so they made the blood green

    They, can, and short term they will... but really the battle from the Chinese government is not just against specific video games, the current government is against video games in general.

    That social worth score that they have where you're give a score by the government to say how good a citizen you are, it is impacted by video games. The more hours of video games you play, the more points you lose. Playing a lot of video games can mean you're banned from staying at certain hotels, getting some jobs, and visiting some shops. Granted, you probably have to waste your life away playing games for it to be significant, but they've already got a bias against video games built in.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  18. The Fortnite ban is somewhat surprising by atrex · · Score: 1

    Fortnite being produced by Epic Games, which is 40% owned by Chinese Tencent, I'm a little surprised at the Fortnite ban. I guess "fantasy violence" they're ok with, but anything with "normal" guns must be a no-no.

  19. If addiction is a concern by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems China has the same issues the United States has in that folks with kiddos either:

    1) Don't know how or
    2) Don't want to be bothered

    with actually being a parent.

    The simple fix for that Fortnite addiction is to simply not allow them to play it for excessive amounts of time.

    You know. . . . BE a parent.

    1. Re:If addiction is a concern by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      Be a parent? HAha, no, that's the government's job dumbass.

  20. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    "They can, but it costs money and time, and they are not willing to spend either."

    Bingo.

    No one wants to support half a dozen different versions of a thing. Even you programmer types can agree on that one.

  21. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by lactose99 · · Score: 1

    Half a dozen? Definitely.

    Two? A distinct possibility.

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  22. Insidious effect of Chinese government control by sinequonon · · Score: 1

    My concern is that Chinese censorship will end up restricting what is available for the remainder of the world. It's going to be a growing, insidious problem that will hamper most forms of media.

    --
    -Bob-
  23. Re:B-but socialism iz gud! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    This is authoritarianism. Usually it's associated with dictatorships or other forms of oppressive government, and yes, that can be socialist. But it can just as well be fascist. Or a theocracy.

    But that's not what you need to hear, right? You're one of those people who label everything you don't like in a country "socialist", right? Oppression of opposition? Socialist. No free press? Socialist. People "disappearing" after a visit from some guys in black trenchcoats? Socialist. Being arrested for "reeducation" if you criticize the government? Socialist.

    I'm pretty sure you're even one of those dimwits that will claim the NSDAP was a socialist party because it had "social" in its name. And it did all those things! See? The definition is true!

    Right?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  24. On Board by ememisya · · Score: 2

    Banning Fortnite? For once I'm not mad at China.

    1. Re:On Board by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      For once I'm not mad at China.

      And the Chinese communist party's next demand will be censoring you on every platform connected to any kind of public network for bring up their crimes. After that they'll demand you to be given no credit at the bank and no access to air-travel or trains.

  25. Re: Why the f*ck are we pandering to China ?? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    One should hope so, but people keep preordering them like they can't learn from previous blunders. Fallout76 had one of the highest preorder rates ever. Yes, sales plummeted right after it got out the door, but who gives a fuck? Preorder sales easily pick up the slack.

    And people will keep preordering. Know why? Because they get that exclusive preorder skin for their puppy and the exclusive preorder emote for the multiplayer game that makes them so SPECIAL!

    So who gives a fuck whether they actually play it after they already bought it?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Did anyone actually RTFA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Out of all of the comments here, none of them actually discuss some of the reasons that these games are up for review.

    Notably, one of those reasons, would make Slashdot fall of the face of China: "Inharmonious chat"

    Actually, this is a VERY legitimate reason for reform in the gaming community and on the internet in general. A lot of games fail because their communities are full of toxic players and that's becoming pretty much the bane of the internet these days. Anyone comparing Slashdot from 15 years ago to now, refers to the same thing, lack of moderation (self moderation?) and the allowing of trolls and toxic opinions to be flooding the comments section, it's no different in gaming. People got used to not being idiots fearing violence or being outcast from society but that disappeared with the age of the internet. China, taking aim on Gaming, will draw ire from the gaming community and the "inharmonious" groups that voice their opinions and only that, but honestly? They're the pioneers of making the internet great again (sorry for the pun) by holding gaming companies accountable for the toxic group of people playing those games. Holy Crap! That's awesome!

    How can we further support this cause?

  27. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by Puls4r · · Score: 1

    And while you're thinking about improving your critical thinking skills and learning what "whataboutism" is, why don't you also go realize that our goverment officials really don't represent the people very well. Classifying Americans into a group like you are is exactly like saying the Chinese government represents the will of the people there. It'd be very very wrong.

  28. they should have done Volkswagen! by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    Application should detect if game is the under test and display teletubbies. Once player takes over - go full nine yeards.

  29. what about Tetris? by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    It teaches you how to think. Flying sticks - verry violent. You can cheat - fraud. Phallic objects - sexual content. Don't even get me started that you are controlling game play not the government.

  30. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    The most ridiculous decision was to ban river raid for brutality. River raid, for fuck's sake!

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  31. I see what you are getting at... however by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I know where you are coming from as I know kids of friends who are generally good but have had to have some punishments applied because Fortnite drove them to some sneakiness to get around parent imposed rules.

    But it seems to me that maybe this is useful, to have a real test of moral character around that can be used to temper otherwise soft individuals. It seems hard to even punish a kid these days, but no Fortnite for week or so is something that means something.

    I've played Fortnite myself a bit, off and on - there's nothing inherently addictive, it's just got a good combination of latent story, gameplay, dance, and humor.

    If kids are exposed to something this powerfully compelling early on, it would give them a lot of willpower later to resist other temptations.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

    They can, but it costs money and time, and they are not willing to spend either.

    It's just another cost / benefit analysis. Some companies do spent the money and time because they see it as worthwhile over the life of the game. For example, Blizzard made a lot of visual changes to World of Warcraft just for China because they have some weird aversion to skeletons and bones. Player skeletons on the ground are replaced with tombstones, undead models don't show bones, bones and bits of meat on the ground are replaced with bread, etc.

    Sure, it may objectively be a waste of time, but if you want to sell in that market (and they let you sell, lol) then you just have to decide if it's worth it. As long as the Chinese don't start dictating how things look and function for everyone else, that seems fine (for a relative meaning of "fine" given the authoritarian society) with me.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  33. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Silent Service and Gunship were on the list too. Gunship. Of all the games. The infantry you "killed" were literally pixels.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Re:we need to ban olympics from them US / UN has t by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    Olympic committee just rejected E-sports. Ban olympics by your logic?

  35. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

    This is an opportunity to show just how risky investing too deeply into China is for gaming studios though. Remember that this review is just a start, and terms change with ebb and flow of Chinese leadership being made aware of potential harm that games may cause to Chinese "societal harmony". Which is the highest virtue in the Chinese system.

  36. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by lgw · · Score: 1

    How do they even get "game missions include fraud" for Diablo? Of all the things to pick to complain about.

    They also complained about "inharmonious chat" for every game. You want to do business in China, either eliminate all chat, or hire a huge team to monitor all chat in real time (I expect TenCent/RIOT will do the latter).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  37. Re:Who cares about them banning games? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

    We've already seen the effect of Hollywood bending over backwards, as you put it, to make movies they think will appeal to the Chinese market. It's a definite concern that videogame companies will tend to self-censor in anticipation of the objectives they think the Chinese censors will have.

    As an independent videogame developer, this places a fairly large burden on me. Do I pay for a Chinese localization and try to enter that market, and then subject myself to the whims of a board of censorship? My inclination is to tell them to piss off, but as a practical matter, that's discarding a potentially large market. Do human rights benefit simply by me refusal to participate in a particular market? Hard to say, but probably not. It's not like the US embargo really helped Cuba.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  38. Re: Who cares about them banning games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whataboutism.

  39. Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG by t0qer · · Score: 1

    >Ban 9 Including Fortnite and PUBG

    Sweet! No more Chinese screaming, "CHINAH NUMBAH ONE!" in pubg voice.

  40. Re: Who cares about them banning games? by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

    Whataboutism.

    Literally not an argument.

  41. Big brother deems your game ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... doubleplusungood. Comply in shutting them down, adjusting them according to the standards of the ministry of love or be collected for immediate recycling at the biomatter tanks in your district.

    Thank you for your cooperation citizen. And remember: Big Mao is watching you.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  42. If you censor for China.... by DewDude · · Score: 1

    You'll have to start censoring for everyone....and I have a pretty damn good feeling plenty of people here...who already don't give a fuck about freedom of expression; would be more than willing to put the screws to these companies.

    It's better to maintain your integrity, stand behind your product, and tell China to go fuck itself.


    But the problem is money talks...and it's become more and more clear that game publishers don't really give two shits about what gamers want...they just want money.

    This is the end of the gaming industry. In a few years everyone will be demanding censorship and all we'll be able to do is look back at the great games we once had.

  43. Re:You 'Muricans are funny by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    hahaha... Classic 'Murican. Says the representative government that he voted for is not a reflection of the people.
    That is EXACTLY what it is. If you keep electing asshats... well.. you're an asshat, asshat.