Slashdot Mirror


Former NASA Engineer Designed Glitter Bomb Trap To Avenge Amazon Delivery Theft Victims (cnbc.com)

They say revenge is a dish best served cold. But for Mark Rober, it's much sweeter served smart, smelly and covered in glitter. From a report: The former NASA engineer-turned-YouTube star has received plaudits online after designing a booby trap to avenge all those who've fallen victim to a new wave of neighborhood crime: doorstep delivery theft. Rober spent six months combining GPS tracking, cameras, fart spray and glitter in an elaborate and amusing mechanism after discovering thieves had stolen an Amazon delivery from his doorstep.

In a video posted on his channel, the 38-year-old, who helped design the U.S. space agency's Curiosity Rover, said his engineering experience left him well-placed to "take a stand" after dismissive police left him feeling "powerless." "If anyone was going to make a revenge ... package and over-engineer the crap out of it, it was going to be me," said Rober, who spent nine years with NASA.

468 comments

  1. One big lawsuit waiting to happen by mykepredko · · Score: 0, Insightful

    While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package. The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system, the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock. This could be big money for the perpetrator and their lawyer.

    IIRC, in South Africa you can booby-trap your car (or at least you could) to deter/punish theives, but I don't believe you can do anything like it anywhere else.

    Maybe the police don't care but I suspect Mr. Rober could be out a lot more than just an Amazon package.

    1. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well... given he’s attempting to be a YouTube star, he probably thinks that any publicity is good publicity.

      I have to admit, when I see a “YouTube star” claiming to be a “former NASA engineer”, my first assumption is he actually shlepped technical drawings around between departments - or was in charge of keeping their monitors clean.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... IANAL
      There is no intent to cause injury. Secondly, this is similar to the way banks put dye packs in stolen goods.

    3. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Software · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He has 4.4 million subscribers. He is a YouTube star, he's not just attempting to be one.

    4. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally to win money in a lawsuit you have to show real damages, not potential harm. 99% of the time nobody is going to be harmed by glitter and fart spray.

    5. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Izuzan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe shouldnt be stealijg peoples packages then.

      What if the package that was stolen had peanut butter in it and the person was deathly alergic ? Think they are going to be able to sue then ? No. THEY STOLE IT !.

      You break the law, live with the consiquences.

    6. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the 4 smart phones and amount of custom hardware, time and energy, it would be pretty easy to move stealing this box to felony theft. Might be worth suing him if you're only going to get charged with a misdemeanor but a felony?

    7. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no shit

    8. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "IIRC, in South Africa you can booby-trap your car (or at least you could) to deter/punish theives"

      You talkin about the BMW flamethower?

    9. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by arth1 · · Score: 0

      There is no intent to cause injury. Secondly, this is similar to the way banks put dye packs in stolen goods.

      There doesn't have to be intent to cause injury. Gross negligence qualifies.
      And the bank dye packs is designed to stain the money, not the thief. That's a very important distinction.

    10. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system,

      A valid complaint, although much lessened by the use of a thrower instead of a gas capsule.

      the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock.

      [citation needed]

      I know this is a problem with some ingredients, and with some propellants... show us that it's a credible threat in this case.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package. The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system, the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock.

      Ummm ... tough?

      This could be big money for the perpetrator and their lawyer.

      Or, the courts decide that you being injured while committing a crime makes you responsible for the outcome.

      Booby trapping with something outright dangerous is one thing ... GPS tracking, fart spray, and glitter is something else.

      Sorry, but if you are stealing a package off my steps and trip and fall, I have no liability because you weren't lawfully there.

      Now, imagine two people working together to steal packages, and one of the suffers from what you describe and dies. The accomplice is now charged with murder, because someone died in the commission of a crime.

      And then they can spend your life in the booty house explaining how they're in prison because you got glitter bombed while stealing Amazon packages and someone died.

      Me, I think this is hilarious.

    12. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

      So don't fucking steal a package and open it when you don't know what's in it! There's no intent to cause physical harm with glitter and so what if there were? Large sums of cash are transported in cases that spray both cash and thief with indelible dye.

    13. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by sycodon · · Score: 1
      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    14. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have to admit, when I see a “YouTube star” claiming to be a “former NASA engineer”, my first assumption is he actually shlepped technical drawings around between departments - or was in charge of keeping their monitors clean.

      His Wikipedia page suggests he's a proper engineer: he has a Mechanical Engineering degree and a Masters (presumably in a related field), and he worked at JPL for 9 years, 7 of which were spent working on Curiosity.

      Prior to this video, my wife and I had stumbled on a handful of his videos over the years. He's clearly a smart guy who is interested in making science and technology more fun and accessible to a wide audience. The sort of person who is capable of inspiring kids to pursue STEM. While we don't subscribe to his channel or seek his videos out, we've enjoyed the videos of his that have popped up as recommendations.

    15. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Are you in Europe or somewhere else with a Civil Law system?
      In the US, Common Law does not have the Civil Law limitation that no one should benefit from a crime, even the victim, and reparations can exceed the damage, with civil tort laws allowing for substantial remuneration for things like infringement on rights and emotional distress.

    16. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Deliberate ignorance is the dumbest ignorance.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    17. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the package that was stolen had peanut butter in it and the person was deathly alergic ?

      Now that could actually be way more amusing than a bunch of glitter that can more or less easily be vacuumed up. Imagine a big ball of peanut butter not constrained by a container containing an internal explosive-like device. Obviously not actual explosives, but maybe some sort of balloon in the middle that, when triggered, is quickly expanded via a CO2 cartridge or something. Not sure if that would work, You could probably also use some sort of pinwheel-like mechanism to catapult it in all directions. Peanut butter all over everything...that would really suck.

      Or maybe some sort of vegetable oil sprinkler system.

    18. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by techguymatt · · Score: 1

      This may depend on the jurisdiction, but I believe there's precedence for "anything bad that happens during/as a result of the commission of a crime is the responsibility of the person committing the crime."

    19. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      How is this "negligence"?

      And (b) You think any of those people are going to go to the police to explain what happened?

      --
      No sig today...
    20. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      This may depend on the jurisdiction, but I believe there's precedence for "anything bad that happens during/as a result of the commission of a crime is the responsibility of the person committing the crime."

      If not then anybody could go around breaking windows and claim they cut their hand on your dangerous glass window.

      (or any number of other frivolous damage claims)

      --
      No sig today...
    21. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nyet · · Score: 2

      I love that nobody seems to be annoyed that the thieves really have no legal risk, whereas Mr Rober is extremely vulnerable.

      It seems to me with as much reach as he does, he could at least make single statement about that.

    22. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I wonder why he "pixellated' the faces out of the criminals he caught on film here?

      They are holding the evidence GUILTY here....should have shown their faces for the world to see....perhaps even the lazy police might even have recognized a few of them.

      Sham he couldn't put something a bit more punishing in there than glitter and fart smell.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    23. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to agree with you. As much as I think the package thief SHOULDN'T have a case, the American legal system is messed up. There have been instances of burglers breaking into homes, being injured, and suing the homeowner. This should be a case of "if you are injured in the process of committing an illegal act you have no recourse", but it - at best - turns into legal fees/hassles for the victimized homeowner and - at worst - can result in the homeowner victim needing to pay the thief.

      So while I would hope that any reasonable judge would laugh the package thief out of court, I could see a thief winning or at least getting a full trial and costing the guy legal fees.

      All this being said, I would love to see a package with a loud speaker system that shouted "PACKAGE THIEF" 30 seconds after it was moved.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    24. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +1 for managing to get that "my wife and I" in there, just like every post. Congrats on finding someone who lets you penetrate their holes, I guess.

    25. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Now that could actually be way more amusing than a bunch of glitter that can more or less easily be vacuumed up. Imagine a big ball of peanut butter not constrained by a container containing an internal explosive-like device.

      How about something like Anthrax....and just take a few thieves/criminals out of the gene pool and be done with it?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Suing him would require admitting guilt in the package theft, which is probably just a misdemeanor, but could still result in some jail time. It would also put a jury against the thief. Given that he went for fairly non-lethal non-toxic components and went out of his way to show the non-toxic labels in his video, pursuing a case against him would be an uphill battle. Personally my first go-to for the chemical component would have been bear spray, which would be a lot sketchier, ethically speaking.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    27. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except booby traps are illegal for a reason. They are incapable of distinguishing from a would-be robber or an innocent victim. Sure, I cannot think of a circumstance where an innocent would be harmed by this, but it doesn't matter. The risk of harming an innocent exists, and no matter how infinitesimal it might be, it is too great a risk.

    28. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Congrats on finding someone who lets you penetrate their holes"

      Well, you're obviously not married!

    29. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by taustin · · Score: 1

      Depends on where he lives. Some states have laws about suing people for things that happen to you while committing a crime. In California, for instance, yeah, you could sue, but if you win, any money collected from the judgement is automatically seized for the victim restitution's fund - before the lawyers get their cut. Really cuts down on the bullshit.

    30. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

      The faces were probably pixelated because YouTube will take-down any video which features someone who did not agree to be in it -- if they lodge a complaint.

      I've had this happen to one of my videos because someone, who was being a real arse, didn't want to be seen being a "real arse" so they complained.

      No point in making a viral video if someone in it can have it pulled with a single complaint.

    31. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who was sued by the robber who broke into hi house, then injured himself seriously by walking through the plate glass of the patio door. He won the lawsuit, for a considerable sum. We just love our lawsuits in the US.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real genius of this device is that it was designed to be funny without causing any kind of serious injury or damage. In fact you can hear some of the thieves on the video laughing. The glitter spreading mechanism is pretty lame; it's like shaking a box of litter around the edge of the box. He could have used a can of compressed air or some kind of pyrotechnic squib to distribute the glitter, and it would end up everywhere, but that includes peoples' eyes.

      There are going to be the inevitable suggestions for how to make the device more damaging or dangerous; and the reason this guy didn't do anything like throwing dye or shrapnel isn't that he wasn't clever enough to see the possibilities. He was clever enough to see the weak point in his plans: the thief-turned-victim has your home address. Get too nasty and he might return the favor with a molotov cocktail or even a bullet.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer gentian violet. Non-toxic, unless you're a fungus. But stains things purple (not a pleasant purple) and is quite difficult to remove. On skin you normally need to let new skin grow to replace the skin that got stained. But it's harmless even if it gets in your eyes.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    34. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I wonder why he "pixellated' the faces out of the criminals he caught on film here?
      [...]
      Sham he couldn't put something a bit more punishing in there than glitter and fart smell.

      He pixelated their faces for the same reason that he can't spray them with purple dye — their commission of a crime doesn't excuse his. They are innocent until proven guilty in court, and showing their faces would create bias and is also a use of their likeness without their permission. While it seems to me that he would have a defense against such claims, IANAL and also why set yourself up for potential legal hassles beyond what's already possible due to glitter and farts?

      perhaps even the lazy police might even have recognized a few of them.

      Probably not, but if that's your goal then you send the video straight to the PD. He can mail them the original video on a DVD or something. I don't know about anyone else, but though I've taken the optical drive out of my primary PC for additional airflow, I've kept a couple of USB ones around and some media as well in case I want to send some data to someone else, through the mail.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of situation has come up previously with a guy in Washington state who set up booby traps after having a bunch of packages stolen off his porch.

      http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/dec/20/this-angry-inventor-has-a-special-gift-for-package/

      The bottom line was that law enforcement only kind-of-sort-of looked down on it. Technically illegal, but they weren't going to lift a finger without someone coming forward to claim harm... and nobody is going to do that because they would be admitting they tried to steal a package off his porch in the process.

    36. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant, without paying for the privilege (or getting paid for the trouble).

    37. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      If not then anybody could go around breaking windows and claim they cut their hand on your dangerous glass window.

      (or any number of other frivolous damage claims)

      A friend of mine was sued by a robber for pretty much that. Fortunately, he had liability protection with his homeowners insurance.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    38. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You fail the see the Genius behind this. Because he is recording it, it is classified as art. You can get away a lot of legal hurdles by calling it Art.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    39. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      How is this "negligence"?

      Scattering particulates without making sure that the human target has eye and airway protection? It's not just negligence, it's willful.

      And (b) You think any of those people are going to go to the police to explain what happened?

      After seeing the video, and finding out that the target is an engineer with enough time and money to dick around with a project like this for six months? Not any of these people, no. They all have clean clothes, and cars and such. But it's well within the realm of possibility.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    40. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      > that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

      And that is precisely why America is FUCKED.

      Victim: I got tired of MY packages being stolen so I booby trapped them
      Thief: I'm suing for emotional distress.
      Victim: WTF!?

    41. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I love that nobody seems to be annoyed that the thieves really have no legal risk

      What about the risk of getting shot? Not every state criminalizes the defending of oneself or ones property.

    42. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is often advisable to make sure there are no surviving victims who can sue.

    43. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple. Anti-climb paint, for example, is only legal most places if you put up warning signs. That someone is breaking the law by climbing your fence doesn't remove your responsibility as it adds to his. Guilt is not a finite commodity, and a trespasser being guilty of entering doesn't make you not guilty of causing harm to his property. They are separate crimes.
      Revenge is not a legal right, and most booby trap devices are just that, even if relatively harmless.

    44. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The faces were probably pixelated because YouTube will take-down any video which features someone who did not agree to be in it -- if they lodge a complaint.

      Complete BS.

      Otherwise every person in just about every news story seen on youtube must have signed a release. Which they clearly didn't.

    45. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine was sued by a robber for pretty much that. Fortunately, he had liability protection with his homeowners insurance.

      So a burgler went to the police to complain that he hurt himself while burgling a house?

      Surely he'd need to take the police to the scene of the accident and explain how it happened.

      Where do you live?

      --
      No sig today...
    46. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. The glitter dispersal was obviously designed not to aim for the face, and the videos clearly show that no physical harm was done. Now had something gone wrong, yeah, he could be liable. Was it immature? Sure. But he obviously put some time and thought into it and had no intention of harming anyone.

    47. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What law do you claim he violated? I can't think of a single law that states that it is illegal to spray theives with glitter. In some states it is legal for him to shoot and kill the theif. Also, this is a design, which is protected by the first amendment. He could design a nuclear bomb and post it and be well within his rights ,(I am assuming US jurisdiction because NASA is a US agency.) IOW, do you put any thought at all into your words before you write them?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    48. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking of a different kind of lawsuit.
      >Thief takes package
      >Glitter bomb activates
      >Thief sues for being turned gay

    49. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scientists have discovered a substance that reduces a woman's sex drive over time. They're calling it "wedding cake".

    50. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Lucas123 · · Score: 2

      Good luck winning that case. No jury would award you a dime after you stole a package and it blew up on you.

    51. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package. The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system

      Yeah, that's why we let kindergarteners use glitter all the time. Because they're always super safe about the potential eye/respiratory consequences... Also, if the perpetrator were opening the package while driving it could be argued they were already putting themselves in danger by allowing themselves to be distracted from the road.

      the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock.

      In which case, someone would probably have sued the fart spray company long ago unrelated to this usage of it. Since it's still on the market, I find this unlikely.

      This could be big money for the perpetrator and their lawyer.

      Not without Johnnie Cochran levels of legal gymnastics.

    52. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the robber truly "win" or did the homeowner's insurance company force a settlement because the insurance company didn't want to spend the money to fight (and eventually win) the lawsuit? I speak from [bitter] experience on this.

    53. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      honestly, I would have used semtex instead of glitter.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    54. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by ahodgson · · Score: 0

      Jury trial. Unless this is in California, he can't possibly get stuck with 10 people that fucking stupid.

    55. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet local media show surveillance video of unknown robbery suspects without pixelation..

    56. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once caught for burglary, double down and steal from the insurance company to. You assume that there's an admission before he got caught.

    57. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be a danger .,.. Bosco. Anti-SJW cause nibberz steel! Break the face and bust the nees of Trotsky-sluts ... how red they peaz ... Burmashave.

    58. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      the thief-turned-victim has your home address. Get too nasty and he might return the favor with a molotov cocktail or even a bullet.

      That's why when you're dealing with criminals you do not "bother" them, you kill them.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    59. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

      Had you read his design info you would know he is more than fine with that.
      If you watched the video even you would hear him imply that is desired.
      To press a civil suit, the thief would need to admit to a felony criminal act and would be punished, which is all this guy wanted in the first place.
      He also spent significant time building the thing. It's perfectly reasonable he would be willing to spend at least up to that much time going to the court to defend himself since that means the thief is 100% going to jail now. Again, that was the original goal.

      Then the separate issue that having glitter delivered to you isn't a crime, so wouldn't be his fault the thief was exposed to it.
      Commercially sold "fart spray" has never done anything like you just made up about it.
      The onus is on the thief to show medical documentation such a thing is even possible, and if it was possible and there was such documentation the stuff wouldn't be on the market anymore.

      At all but a city level this guy committed *no* crimes, but even if he chose to do so, if the police don't feel property theft is a worth while crime to peruse, now you know exactly the level of crime you can do and have it ignored too.

      Just avoid crimes with higher punishment levels, as then you risk doing something the police *would* investigate.
      But clearly he is already thinking along those lines, so will be fine there. After all, he could have stopped at the GPS tracker level and just gone over to assault the thief if he didn't care about breaking laws.

    60. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And yet local media show surveillance video of unknown robbery suspects without pixelation..

      Local media has lawyers on retainer. They're also the media. They get to claim that their purpose is to inform, even when their purpose is to profit. The much-maligned blogger (or vlogger, etc.) is broadly considered to not be a journalist. If your goal is to blow up on youtube and make money, then you can't hide behind the excuse of doing the public a service.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    61. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      Really? There's few jurisdictions where both fuzzy justifiable homicide laws and lax local prosecution would seriously allow someone to use deadly force to shoot someone running away with a package. At best its going to be misdemeanor larceny, at worst you're shooting someone in the back who's actively running away.

      IF you're a well-connected person in some rural area you MIGHT get this covered up, but I seriously doubt if there was any publicity you'd be able to get away with it.

      And really the problem with package thefts isn't some rural issue, it's mostly an urban issue. More houses, more theft opportunity, and most police departments lack the manpower to even bother with much in the way of patrols in basically low-crime neighborhoods. There's no way you're shooting and killing people anywhere in the US over package theft.

    62. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep! In my Florida neighborhood we shoot porch-banditos ... get six pairs-of-ears and you win a pedicure & 12-pak of Nehi orange soda. Nibberizing SJW Trotsky-sluts beware !!!

    63. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by hey! · · Score: 1

      Then you have to kill them with a very high probability of success, which is not so easy, especially if you want to avoid collateral damage.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    64. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      The faces were probably pixelated because YouTube will take-down any video which features someone who did not agree to be in it -- if they lodge a complaint.

      Complete BS.

      Otherwise every person in just about every news story seen on youtube must have signed a release. Which they clearly didn't.

      GP: "if they lodge a complaint"
      You: "they must have signed a release"
      Point: above head

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    65. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      He didn't go to the police at all. Why would you, for a lawsuit? He did go to the emergency room. His story was that he was drunk and accidentally entered the wrong house (by kicking in the door). The cops had no interest after the fact.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    66. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't get the details. The insurance company paid, is all I know. My friend didn't care that much, since insurance was handling it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    67. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2

      The law states that one cannot benefit from one's criminal actions. If the perpetrator were to sue, the perpetrator would be confessing to theft, possibly grand theft, and any attendant crimes and would then have to go before a jury and say "I am a shitball thief who stole a booby-trapped package and I want you to reward me for my criminal behavior so you can be my next victim!" and, in the unlikely event the perp wins, Rober can counter sue for theft and intentional infliction of emotional distress and get all that money back.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    68. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nnull · · Score: 1

      Most jurisdictions have been cutting back funding to Police, like mine, which has a large population but only 1 cop. Crime, like robberies and break ins, have been rising and the city really doesn't care. All they care about is all the development of tilt ups based on speculation going up. Most of them are still vacant or really no sales tax producing storage warehouses.

      I'm already seeing people deal justice by themselves because the lack of enforcement by many jurisdictions and it's only a matter of time before we go full on Argentina or Mexico where we just execute the person and bury them, if we haven't already.

    69. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I can ;make a good case for it not being illegal, starting with the fact that it is his property which is sitting on his property and he knows what the contents will do. If a criminal wants to trespass and commit theft then that criminal is responsible for what happens next. One may as well say the owner of a car stolen by an unlicensed minor is guilty of allowing the minor to drive said car or saying the original owner of a stolen gun used to shoot someone has broken the law.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    70. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      I do remember reading an article a while back about thieves stealing what turned out to be a radiation source for medical equipment. Eventually it was found and had apparently been opened and put back together. They said the thieves would only likely live a few more days as opening the container without protection would've given them a fatal dose.

    71. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Or they were pixelated because it was all staged, and they were his buddies who agreed to act in his film.

    72. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      This begs the question as to whether they were really guilty of anything. He created a device that was meant to be 'stolen'. I don't remember specifics but there were people found guilty a few years ago of leaving their garage open and ambushing people who came to steal things. They were found guilty of a pretty serious crime, forget exactly what. Now in that case they were using guns so a bit of an escalation. But I think this isn't quite so cut and dry.

    73. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by MerlTurkin · · Score: 2

      FUCK THEM. They are the one's that stole the packages. They're lucky that's all that happened to them. I applaud the guy!

    74. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the police shouldn't be protecting the victims, but the lawyers should be protecting the robbers?

    75. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      why not record the blank and have a small amp and speaker in there. It's just a loud noise then, no explosive, and would be pretty much as effective.

      I had a similar problem with thieves stealing from my shed, I made a mains powered electric fence, along with a warning sign. It was quite diy and i insulated the wires from ground and the cable went into my house. Of course it wasn't actually hooked up to the mains supply. It was totally inert but quite realistic.

      But who is going to risk coming into contact with something like that? It ended the problem.
         

    76. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Jury trials don't work like that. The jury is only allowed to decide contested "matters of fact", and usually neither the defense nor prosecution is allowed to make them aware of *motive* (unless the motive itself is contested). That's why juries render verdicts every day that look completely *outrageous* to anyone who knows the context. Often, the jury members are often the only ones who *officially* DON'T know the context (at least, not until 10 minutes after leaving the courtroom and being completely horrified).

      It's also why, when a jury *does* engage in nullification, the members get grilled by the judge to explain how they reached the verdict... and the judge declares a mistrial if anyone lets it slip that they found the defendant innocent because they disagreed with the law itself rather than reaching the verdict solely by considering only the evidence presented and without disregarding the judge's explicit instructions.

    77. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      What law do you claim he violated?

      Just for starters, and for the purpose of starting at the boring end of the stick, I searched Google for "glitter vandalism" [this is the third result]

      Also, this is a design, which is protected by the first amendment.

      We're not talking about designing it, we're talking about deploying it. The conversation is over there ------>

      IOW, do you put any thought at all into your words before you write them?

      Throwing glitter in people's faces without taking precautions is risking harming them. You could get it in their eyes. On one hand, I have enough schadenfreude in me to potentially enjoy that, and on the other hand I'd prefer they just got caught. On the gripping hand, I'd like to see them get the help they need to not feel like they need to steal from people — preferably without involving the prison-industrial complex.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    78. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      In what jurisdiction is admitting to breaking and entering mitigated by admitting to public intoxication?

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    79. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yes they shouldn't be stealing other people's packages. Yet it will only take one thief opening the package in the presence of his 5 year daughter to cause her permanent damage and then it becomes a real crime.

    80. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They absolutely do have plenty of legal risk. For the property crimes they commit, that is. Depending on the jurisdiction, this would be simple theft, grand theft (for expensive items), burglary, or similar. And Mr. Rober is perfectly free to set up cameras to guard against this kind of theft, which can be used as evidence in criminal and civil proceedings where he can be made whole and do not attempt to harm anyone who opens the package, which might include not just thieves, but delivery personnel or folks at a postal recovery center if the original labeling is inadvertently destroyed.

      What Mr. Rober has liability for are his own criminal actions, which are crimes against the person, a class of crime generally looked upon much more harshly under American Law. It's very illegal in all jurisdictions in the United States to set so-called "man-traps" that can physically harm people like this, and in most places, even thieves can collect because they are someone who is foreseeably might fall victim to the trap, thus establishing intent to injure on Mr. Rober's part before the thieves have even committed any crime. Furthermore, if these packages pass through the U.S. Mail, then it becomes a very serious federal crime.

      And for those saying "well, you can shoot a thief!" yes, while some states will justify use of force to prevent a theft where the rightful owner catches the thief in the act, only the very small number of jurisdictions with the very harshest, regressive laws would find lethal force acceptable where there is no risk of physical harm to the rightful owner, particularly over the typical low-value item purchased from Amazon.

      In short, Mr. Rober may be an ex-NASA engineer, but he certainly lacks common sense and judgment in pulling a stunt like this, and if he does end up facing a lawsuit or arrest, he deserves it.

    81. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      It's a multi-factor problem.

      Cops quit doing anything like neighborhood patrols years ago, partly as a result of the switch to squad cars and partly as a result of computerized crime fighting which put more cops in areas with statistically higher crime.

      But even if they did more neighborhood patrols, it wouldn't do any good because the political changes prevent cops from doing any profiling at all. There's not even an existential risk of getting pulled over if you're stealing packages, even if you're black and driving a beater in an upscale white neighborhood.

      You have to literally get caught red-handed and with a package not addressed to you to get caught, and I'm told that they open them immediately and toss the packaging and/or the contents (if its not salable). In years past the cops would have pulled most package thieves over for not fitting into the neighborhoods they were in and a junker filled with random new products would have put the thieves at least on the short list of possible crooks if not arrested.

      The up side is that we have more efficient policing and less racial profiling. The downside is that mostly middle class neighborhoods have seen a reduction in crime prevention.

    82. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by k2r · · Score: 1

      This story fits the general sentiment of your footer too well, so I call bullshit on you until you provide proper source.

    83. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      In some states it is legal for him to shoot and kill the theif.

      Only if he does it in person. Deadly mantraps are illegal in all 50 states. Nominally not deadly mantraps may not be criminal, but anyone injured by one can sue and win civilly. Katko v. Briney.

    84. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package. The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system, the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock. This could be big money for the perpetrator and their lawyer.

      Nope. In the US we have the "clean hands doctrine" which says you cannot sue someone for doing something if you yourself did something wrong as part of it. If one of the package thieves tried to sue Rober because they got "glitter lung" or something, it would 99% be tossed out of court because they were stealing a package off his doorstep, and the stolen package tossed up glitter. They don't have clean hands in the case.

      Now, if Rober had left the device in a public space with "take me" written on it, and the person who took it and opened it got "glitter lung" then they could reasonably take him to court.

    85. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for Christ sakes! Lets not bother the people breaking the law because we are afraid of a lawsuit. Stealing is not a protected citizens right. And to cover all the bases it is also not a human right. The police blew off the incident so he decided covering the thief with fart smelling confetti would at least give him a small mount of justice. If packages are being stolen from his front door that means the thief is committing criminal trespassing which also means in some areas of the country a 12-gauge blast to the chest while creeping up to your front door is not totally out of line .

    86. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system, the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock.

      There's not a jury in America that would convict if it were thumbtacks and mace. Especially if they've had their packages stolen.

      Just like if you break into a house and the dog rips your face off - maybe don't be a burglar next time.

      People need to stop being so damn afraid of defending themselves. And if what you're really afraid of is your government punishing you for defending yourself while at the same time refusing to defend you ... well, son, you got bigger problems than packages. "You might live under tyranny if..."

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    87. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about some sort of deer lure urine...

    88. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purple dye isn't accurate. Banks have long added paint bombs to money bags for robberies. They explode and make the money useless but also cover everything around them in different colors of paint.

    89. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By attempting to litigate against Mr. Rober, first, they have to admit, in court, that they committed a felony, and potentially, a federal crime.

      But, glad to know you're siding with the bottom-feeding scum that steal packages in broad daylight.

    90. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Thanks! I'd have counted myself fortunate to simply meet someone of such outstanding character, beauty, integrity, humor, and intellect as my wife. Instead, however, I got to marry her. Not only that, but she's from a wonderful family. How many people actually get to say that they have great relationships with their in-laws and look forward to when they visit? Not many, from my experience, yet I'm able to do so. I'm an incredibly fortunate man.

      I don't drop "my wife and I" into every post, like you're suggesting, but I do drop it into the posts where it adds something or acknowledges her role in something, just as I would with "a coworker and I" or "a friend and I". For instance, the fact that my wife and I both enjoyed videos from this YouTuber would suggest that they have a broad appeal, given that she's a "normal", not a nerd. Alternatively, if I didn't do something by myself, it only makes sense that I acknowledge the role that others played in doing that thing, rather than trying to suggest that I was capable of doing or thought to do it by myself.

    91. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by evendiagram · · Score: 1

      He was clever enough to see the weak point in his plans: the thief-turned-victim has your home address. Get too nasty and he might return the favor with a molotov cocktail or even a bullet.

      I also thought this was the most clever part - he annoyed the thief enough to discard the GPS package but not enough that they'd want retribution. It's a dangerous game when you start fucking with people who know where you live.

    92. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but a crime committed in the course of "art" is still a crime. He can't be charged or sued for making the video, but he certiainly can be for the underlying criminal acts (constructing and deploying a booby trap, battery, various federal felonies if it actually gets sent through the mail).

      IAL, and you and whoever upvoted you are morons.

    93. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      Intent is required for most crimes. The legal definition usually starts with the word "knowingly". Burglary is something like "entering or remaining on a property, when not authorized, with the intent of committing a crime".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    94. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      So, essentially, you get your stuff stolen and can do nothing about it.

      Also, Mr. Rober did not send the package trough the mail, he just put a fake shipping label (even addressed to the two thieves in Home Alone) and placed it on the steps to his door.

      What looks more weird to me is that the delivery people would just put your item in the open, no need to sign for it etc. In my country, if the item is delivered to the door, someone from that address have to pick it up and sign for it. If the item is sent trough the post, it would either be delivered to the door (and someone has to sign for it) or I would have to go to the post office to pick it up, show my ID card and sign for it.

    95. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      > that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

      And that is precisely why America is FUCKED.

      Victim: I got tired of MY packages being stolen so I booby trapped them Thief: I'm suing for emotional distress. Victim: WTF!?

      The key is having jurors with enough moral courage to do the right thing and to never forget jury nullification. A situation like this can can be declared not guilty even if the judge instructs you that 'you must follow the law even if the law is bad'. The whole point of a jury of your peers is to apply the law fairly and that sometimes means jury nullification. Citation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    96. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because 1) it's pretty fucking obvious (foreseeable in legalese) that the glitter could get in someone's eyes and blind them or the spray cause an allergic/asthmatic reaction, and 2) because laws already exist making this kind of thing a crime because of the danger it presents not just to thieves but to anyone else (mail carriers, neighborhood children, animals) who might inadvertently be harmed by the device. That's prima facie evidence that he should know that this is a pretty fucking bad idea.

      And it's not the police I'd be focusing on. If you watched the video, they already told him that they wouldn't come out for such a petty crime. It's the friendly neighborhood tort attorney the thieves are liable to hire.

    97. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in some jurisdictions, property owners have a certain degree of responsibility for establishing reasonably safe conditions for anyone who might foreseeably enter their property, including trespassers. You might ask how this could make sense, but if the trespasser is say a kid or special needs person who wandered in then fell into your open pit in the front yard containing your collection of rusty antique swords, you might see the poinbt.

      The fact that they were able to successfully argue that a plate glass window was such a hazard means that the thief either had a very good lawyer, or that the insurance company figured it would be more expensive to contest the lawsuit and decided to settle.

    98. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by agm · · Score: 1

      We're not talking about designing it, we're talking about deploying it. The conversation is over there ------>

      He didn't deploy it. He left it on his own property and someone stole it. That's not "deployment".

      If I have an unfinished piece of work in my garage that's dangerous (e,g, unfinished wiring, sharp edges) I cannot be held responsible if someone steals it and hurts themselves.

    99. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by arth1 · · Score: 1

      How is this "negligence"?

      If the reasonable man on the Clapham Omnibus would have understood that something could cause danger, and the precautions needed were reasonable, it's negligence.

      Intent is not required.
      If I mail an envelope with a razorblade in inadequate packaging and the mailman hurts himself, I get sued, even if I didn't intend for him to hurt himself.
      If I leave the head off my well, and a neighbor's child trespasses and falls into it, I get charged, even if I didn't intend for anyone to fall into it.

    100. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jury trials don't work like that.

      That's not entirely true, especially for civil trials. I've been on several juries in civil cases (never been in on a criminal case), and from my experience most jurors are swayed by emotion, and what they "feel is the right thing", regardless of what the law actually states and what instructions the court has given them.

      On one case, I was the last hold-out (these cases don't need a unanimous decision), because to me the plaintiff had not properly proven any wrong-doing by the defendant (which was a medical facility). Based on how the law was written and the instructions given to us by the judge, they had actually done everything they could have done for the patient who left against medical advice (AMA), and they had no legal standing to force him to stay against his will. But since the patient ended up dying the jury decided to award his family money.

    101. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by greythax · · Score: 1

      Not that I think this invention constitutes a booby trap, but most states do have laws forbidding the creation and deployment of booby traps, even on your own property. Usually under the guise of promoting public health and safety. Secretly, I always assumed they were about protecting police when they enter a property, but it make sense that you wouldn't want little timmy falling into a punji pit just because he chased his dog into old man crazy pants front yard. If I remember correctly, I do think it is legal in Texas as long as the trap was not created to "Knowingly harm or kill."

      Anecdotally, I do know a guy that was having a hard time with people using his front yard to cut a corner in his neighnorhood, so he put down some railroad ties with spikes driven in them. Sure enough some kids ran over it and popped all 4 tires. Cop told him if he didn't remove them right then, he was going to jail. Ended up having to drag them out with his truck while the cop watched. Still ended up getting a citation for some code or another.

    102. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that "the media" doesn't require registration. Simply publishing something makes you "the media". Yes, a much-maligned blogger (or vlogger, etc.) is "the media".

    103. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by eth1 · · Score: 1

      > that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

      And that is precisely why America is FUCKED.

      Victim: I got tired of MY packages being stolen so I booby trapped them
      Thief: I'm suing for emotional distress.
      Victim: WTF!?

      The fact that this thing had four phones in it, plus other custom electronics, etc. means it was probably worth several thousand dollars, likely making it's theft a felony. Most of these package thieves seem to be normal people being assholes, so I'm guessing if they went to a lawyer, and said "I want to sue," the lawyer would probably explain a few things to them.

      Even if he did get sued, given the number of subscribers he has, and how much people hate the package thieves, it'd probably take about 4 hours to crowd-fund more legal defense money than he'd ever need.

    104. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by coolsnowmen · · Score: 2
    105. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by d0rp · · Score: 1

      the thief-turned-victim has your home address.

      Not necessarily, especially if they were going around and stealing packages from multiple houses like some of the thieves in the video were doing, He purposely put a fake label with fake names and addresses on it, so the thief might not remember which house he stole that particular package from.

    106. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      He didn't deploy it. He left it on his own property and someone stole it. That's not "deployment".

      He made a whole video about how he planned and executed it, at which point that idea went out the window for ever and ever amen.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    107. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You literally said they were illegal and they aren't illegal in the same paragraph. (It's not a crime means it isn't illegal in case you were unaware of that.)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    108. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually these days they would sue, and win big! Just like the blond that burned her crotch with hot coffee at McDonalds, Or the thief that broke into a bar, and tripped and fell, injuring himself. It didn't mater that he was a thief, that he broke into the bar, he sued because he got injured on their property and won!

    109. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use J&J baby powder, buy it off ebay and estate sales... It's full of asbestos, but you "didn't know that"

    110. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to bet he didn't "win". As someone already posted, a criminal cannot profit from a crime, so any winnings would have been seized immediately. Any settlement from the insurance company would have as well. When you read about a criminal suing for getting injured while committing a crime, there's always some very pertinent facts omitted. And besides, even if they did win, it would be appealed immediately and overturned.

      I don't know what state you live in, but I live in CO and somebody cannot sue you if they are on your property without invitation. My brother was on a jury where an old lady came to deliver cookies to some new neighbors, slipped on some ice on the porch and sued. The court found that since she came uninvited, the lawsuit was without merit and ordered her to pay legal fees of the defense.

    111. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by anegg · · Score: 1

      In the United States, package delivery services (including the United States Postal Service) provide a range of delivery guarantee options, ranging roughly from "drop it on the porch" to "requires signature from the recipient who is over the age of 21". The entity sending the package generally determines the type of delivery guarantee requested.

      People who live in neighborhoods generally regarded as "safe" may not think about risks involved in package delivery until they are hit with theft themselves. I think that the rise in package deliveries due to the adoption of shopping by web over the last ten years has cultivated a new type of criminal behavior that seems to be "normalized" for some individuals. I wonder if they don't believe they are stealing from the individuals receiving the package, because they aren't breaking into their house to get it. From observing the folks in the YouTube video, what is painfully obvious is just how casual the folks are at their thefts. Walking up on porches in broad daylight, scooping up the package, and casually walking away or getting in a car and driving away. A few opened the packages in their car, others obviously took them home to see what they had stolen.

      I first observed this problem when I began finding packages ripped open/discarded on my road - a relatively out of the way street nearby a more dense suburban area - around Christmas time about 10 years ago. Not a lot the police can do... people need to understand the risk involved in deliveries to their property and request delivery guarantees that match the risk. People living in dense neighborhoods with easily-accessible front porches should probably use package lockers or delivery signatures. Those with more hidden/less accessible delivery spots can probably do without.

    112. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      An entire second of google showed this: https://definitions.uslegal.co...
      There are laws against any automatic booby trap, just about everywhere.....
      Personally, I think he should get a medal, but law != justice no matter what you think.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    113. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Congrats on finding someone who lets you penetrate their holes, I guess.

      Thanks! I'd have counted myself fortunate to simply meet someone...I do drop it into the posts where it adds something or acknowledges her role in something, just as I would with "a coworker and I" or "a friend and I..."

      I appreciate your eloquent answer to an obvious troll. But I think a simple "go away, the adults are talking here" could have worked the same. Jealousy is a stinky cologne.

    114. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spraying anybody with glitter against their will is assault.

      It doesn't matter that they stole your package -- and that isn't proven: what if it was a neighbor holding it for you, or a bomb squad coming to remove it, or any other explanation than thief?

    115. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make a decision about their legal risk, weighed against the benefit. For them, it's worthwhile.

      This does not mean that there is zero legal risk, and you seem to conclude.

    116. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it was I would do everything I could to be on a jury for a guy like this and then do what should be done - let the guy totally walk.

      I've considered a few times of embedding a GPS locator inside of something in a package and be able to follow the miscreants back to their nest. I feel, as do many others that have been violated, that a couple of well placed .45 subsonic loads to their skulls would make the world a better place.

      My trailer already has this hidden in the frame - and I live in a high-theft area. When it happens, some criminals are going to be dead and I am going to be able to sleep like a baby. I just need to weld me up an in-home resomator (look it up) so I toss their bodies in the trailer, put their cell phones in some Faraday bags, take them home, put 'em in the tank, melt them, flush them, wash, rinse and repeat. My "Does It Blend?" blender is ready and waiting to make powder of all their electronics. Scumbags.

    117. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all on camera so all your what ifs are just impotent posturing.

    118. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "wouldn't do any good because the political changes prevent cops from doing any profiling at all."

      Keep believing everything you hear...makes you easier to profile.

    119. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it's probably fake like most YouTube channels... Just like people mailing themselves in boxes, sleeping overnight in Walmart, stolen bike ejection seats, magic tricks for cops, pattymayo fake bounty Hunter and so forth. If it's on YouTube, they probably paid someone from Craigslist gigs $50 to star on it.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    120. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Embed a silent GPS into something valuable. Follow them to their nest. Take out them and whomever happens to be associated with them at the same time. Larger problem solved.

      Just make sure to not leave the casings behind, and chuck the barrel of the gun you used into a drill press to drill out the bore (no ballistics match) then dispose of the barrel. For grins make it look like a simple robbery. Be sure to bring a Faraday shielded container to put their phones in after you turn them off. Take their wallets and anything else of value.

      The key is to make it look like a drug-related incident that has nothing to do with your property being stolen, especially if your property isn't "real" as such.

      Be prepared though to answer questions if the police subpoena the tracking records of their cells because they will show they went right by your property and probably hit more targets than just yours - shows motive. You can either be prepared to respond extremely quickly - or build a case by learning their location, who they are, where they live, etc, and expiring them later when action / response cannot be reliably correlated. If it is immediate? You have an option to take some packages with you - but I wouldn't. Just making it look like some unfortunate deal gone bad is what LEO's will assume anyway, since you're probably not dealing with the cream of society.

    121. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That's... strange. One would think that railroad ties alone would be adequate to deter such behavior. Unless you buried them, it's hardly a booby trap - it's a clearly visible hazard. Like those Severe Tire Damage things.

    122. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to mention lose the firing pin mechanism - or replace it. They can match the pin to the primer of the cartridge - which is why it's best to retrieve the casings in any event.

    123. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why I am big advocate of tracking them with GPS and hunting them down like the animals they are. Just don't leave witnesses. Alive or electronic.

    124. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by ledow · · Score: 1

      No worse than the bank cash-marking dyes, which literally explode with coloured and very sticky dye if the security box carrying the money to/from the bank or the ATM is stolen or broken into.

      I doubt a judge would look sympathetically on any such case, even to a third-party. The guy stealing the stuff is the trigger - no different to stealing a toy that makes a noise unexpectedly and puts him off his driving.

      Anaphylactic shock? That's a shame. Maybe the guy shouldn't go around stealing stuff he shouldn't be allergic to.

      I'm not one of the "serves him right, fair game, anything goes" crowd, but on this kind of level? Yeah, not a problem. It would be laughed out of court and the blame firmly put on the person nicking things that aren't his and driving off at speed.

      Could have been a box of live bees (perfectly legal to post in my country!). Same thing. If he hadn't stolen something that wasn't his, he'd know what it could or couldn't do and compensated accordingly.

    125. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I hear you, and I agree that such a response would have been warranted, but at least for me my go-to response is to lean into it further when there's stuff like this. You saw me trip and fall? Watch as I get up, take an elaborate bow, and pause for your applause. Now we both have a funny story to tell and we can all laugh as the awkwardness evaporates. I have to wear a silly hat at the corporate birthday party? Watch me pick the silliest hat and proudly rock it. Feel free to tell whatever stories you want about my wearing of said silly hat. I'm fine with you sharing them and I want you to know it. To me, there's no more reason to feel shame or embarrassment over situations like these than there is reason to cry over spilt milk. My pride isn't wounded when I trip and fall or wear a silly hat, and for anyone else with their priorities in the right order, I'd expect that the same would be true.

      The only difference with this variety of troll is that they're trying to introduce shame into a situation where it doesn't exist. Leaning into it just makes it obvious how dumb that notion is without stooping to their level. Trying to make me feel awkward for bringing up my wife? Let me talk about how awesome she is, because that's just about my favorite thing to do and I'm incredibly proud of her. Anyone who thinks I'd be shamed by the suggestion that I mention my wife too much clearly doesn't know me.

      Most trolls are ill-suited to handle forthright responses from people with nothing to hide, particularly when those answers point back towards something lacking in the life of the troll (going back to your point regarding jealousy). They almost invariably fall apart once you put them off-balance just a bit.

      Besides which, as a general rule I prefer to elevate the level of conversation, especially when someone says something that's plain dumb. I'm not perfect, so I routinely fail to do so (as recently as yesterday, in fact), but I do try. And if I can't be bothered to try, I generally just ignore them. "Don't feed the trolls" seems to work most of the time, in my experience.

    126. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Hmm, usually this sort of thing is covered with warning labels--though I suppose most thieves are too dumb to know what they mean.

    127. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ffs people - this isn't a troll, just a pragmatic opinion.

    128. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your glitter vandalism link: Yes, she smashed photos and "destroyed a computer, scanner, printer and keyboard" but I'm sure it's the glitter and silly string that did her in.

    129. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The homeowner should have claimed that no, HE broke the glass door. How is the criminal going to prove that he was there that night?

    130. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

      Unless you live in California where criminals have more rights than you or I do, any judge you bring this to is going to laugh you right out of court. Then they are going to arrest you.

      Yes, your honor, I not only tresspassed upon private property, but I also engaged in criminal behavior by stealing items from said location.

      Upon opening the package, I was covered in glitter against my will and the inside of my car smells like shit.

      I would like to press charg. . . why are you laughing at me ?

      Yes, your honor, I understand had I not engaged in the aforementioned criminal activity we would not be having this conversation.

      How DARE someone pick on the poor criminals after the police told them ( even with video evidence ) that it wasnâ(TM)t worth their time.

      Also, since Banks use exploding dye packs for the idiots dumb enough to take them, I have serious doubts anyone is going to take your glitter issue seriously.

      Personally, I would have used a smoke bomb / pepper gas combo. Both non-lethal ( thus not considered a booby trap ) but far more effective.

      TLDR: No one is going to have any sympathy for thugs.

    131. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      So is tresspassing.
      So is theft.

      Law abiding folks have nothing to worry about do they ?

    132. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by pyhoff · · Score: 1

      Hum wonder what your day job is .... smells like ambulance chaser.

    133. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your country, in mine, if you commit a crime against me, you can't have a case against me unless I commit a crime against you in retaliation that is not a direct result of the crime you committed. So if you break into my home and I crack your skull with a baseball bat, it might be considered overstepping self defense, but certainly nothing more severe. If I manage to subdue you somehow and THEN continue to torture and maim you, make you my sex slave and upload it all on Pornhub, complete with your private information, it's a crime against you that is no longer a direct consequence of the crime you committed, because I could have not done it without any potential ill consequence against me. I'd have to stop at the point where you are no longer an immediate danger to me.

      In this case, the person setting up the trap cannot even stop the thief from opening the package. Yes, he set up a trap, but he in no way enticed the thief to steal the package. He didn't go "hey, buddy, look, you can have it, nobody's looking". He put a box on private property where nobody but the rightful owner has any business touching anything.

      I can't talk about your legal system, but if anyone stealing this box can have a case, it's FUBAR and should be replaced with something sensible.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    134. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      Glitter and / or Fart spray pretty much sit at the other end of the spectrum from Deadly Force :|

    135. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      Booby Trap equates to intent to harm.

      Glitter and Fart Spray don't qualify.

    136. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by sargeUSMC · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of whistling in the dark here. And several straw (wo)man ("that can harm", "might fall victim", "if...pass through the mail").

      First off, IANAL.

      These devices would be unlikely to be considered man-traps in any way. For it to be a trap, it needs to physically, well, trap a man (or woman). I would think this falls more into the booby-trap category, but even that requires a ridiculous amount of squinting.

      Even if we stick with the man-trap theory, some basic research leads me to believe that only man-traps that cause injury or death are illegal from a criminal perspective. This device does not cause injury or death, only embarrassment. Even if the (alleged) thief dropped dead from surprise, there is unlikely to be a DA in the country who would spend five minutes contemplating charges. And good luck seating a jury that wouldn't laugh the case out of the room.

      Which leaves civil. While one of the people who removed the device from his property could try suing him in civil court, what exact damages would they be trying to recover? The cost of cleaning up the glitter? Being deprived of the value of what they thought they were stealing? An attorney who tried to bring this case might want to consider the strong possibility of sanctions for pursuing frivolous claims with no basis in law or fact.

      Filing such a suit would also probably attract the attention of the local DA who generally won't appreciate the (alleged) thief trying to game the system. And with all the evidence already in hand (multiple video, audio, location tracking), it seems like it would a slam dunk for the DA to secure a criminal conviction. Which would almost certainly sink any civil suit filed.

      The (alleged) thief could potentially expose themselves to a civil suit themselves, and depending on jurisdiction, this case could have actual teeth and real risk for the (alleged) thief.

      If, as you say, our NASA Engineer here has committed a crime, he has posted that fact publically, with video and audio evidence for the world to see (15M views and counting). However, as much hand waving you want to do about the rights of (alleged) thieves and the possible liability that he might face, here is the simple proof he hasn't committed a crime in the eyes of the law:

      The (alleged) thieves don't get to press charges only DA's do. The simple fact is that no DA has charged him with anything and none will. There have been and will be no civil suits filed because there is no basis for one, and any idiot coming forward to file one is exposing themselves to enormous amount of exposure to themselves on both the criminal and civil side.

    137. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      " Really? There's few jurisdictions where both fuzzy justifiable homicide laws and lax local prosecution would seriously allow someone to use deadly force to shoot someone running away with a package. "

      Texas allows it. Commission of a crime while tresspassing on private property puts things into motion. If you believe the items stolen cannot be recovered, you can legally shoot the individual ( even if running from you ) to prevent the theft.

    138. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The faces were probably pixelated because YouTube will take-down any video which features someone who did not agree to be in it -- if they lodge a complaint.

      Complete BS.

      Otherwise every person in just about every news story seen on youtube must have signed a release. Which they clearly didn't.

      Newsworthy images of people are exempt from model releases

    139. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      They call the police all the time to report the theft of their stash, so yeah, some might.

    140. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your are assuming it is all real.
      Do you really think the two thieves who spoke it themselves then calmly explain what they are doing, talking to themselves.
      He has a great channel, but he has a a film person, a build team, video editors, actors, you name it.

    141. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      The spikes and railroad ties could be construed as what is called a "Man trap" in canada at least. anything that is set up to injure or cause harm to a human. and a big block of wood with railroad spikes id think would fit that.

    142. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your friend live in California? I'm asking, because this sounds like nutty California laws.

    143. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't even spray the glitter, it basically dumps it everywhere and makes a big mess in their car. It doesn't even do any permanent damage to the car, just creates a great big mess that is going to be a major inconvenience to clean up.

    144. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by _merlin · · Score: 1

      He could design a nuclear bomb and post it and be well within his rights

      Actually he wouldn't be - see this and .

    145. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      There is no "drop it on the porch" option in my country. Unlike what I see on the internet about the USA, individual houses in my country have fences and my fence from the street is 2m tall and completely opaque, so a couple of times the lady who delivers the mail has called and offered to throw the package over my fence as the package did not require a signature. There was somebody home, so she didn't need to do that though.

      Normally the delivery is either handed to you (or someone at your address) and you have to sign it, or you have to go to the post office and show your ID.
      Recently they made a third option (which is cheaper) - your package gets delivered to a special locker, you go there and have to type in a password that you received in a text message.

    146. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thieves deserve this and worse

    147. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by sjames · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know, an innocent bystander, possibly a child too young to know better dies of anthrax. Then you do hard time for bio-terrorism.

    148. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by sjames · · Score: 1

      That or replace the fart spray with skunk scent.

    149. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package. The glitter being thrown about the car is definitely a danger to eyes as well as the respiratory system, the chemicals in the fart spray could trigger anaphylactic shock. This could be big money for the perpetrator and their lawyer.

      IIRC, in South Africa you can booby-trap your car (or at least you could) to deter/punish theives, but I don't believe you can do anything like it anywhere else.

      Maybe the police don't care but I suspect Mr. Rober could be out a lot more than just an Amazon package.

      A plaintiff would have to admit to a crime, allow the criminal case to complete before the civil case can be heard, pay Mr. Rober restitution after the criminal case is over, and then convince a jury that he/she deserves compensation. "Good luck" (a la Morgan Freeman).

    150. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely he hired them on Craigslist gigs or similar service. Faker than pattymayo bountyHunter.

    151. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing special about California, as just about any where in the US you can get in trouble for booby traps, especially if some gets hurt. Something that indiscriminately hurts someone entering your property is very bad across the country. Even in Texas, when a teenager got cut up trying to steal a poorly installed radio from my car, I had to spend effort proving that it was laziness and not intentionally involving sharp edges.

    152. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also how you get jury members thinking the defendant should get off because they already suffered more than they should for a given crime. I have had to deal with this, and it can be highly biased based on the age and color of the defendant.

    153. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignorance is deliberate by definition, you have to ignore knowledge to be ignorant

    154. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      That's a good cause, so it means that laser printer toner in various colors would also be ok. And it's harder to get rid of than glitter.

      "I can't help that the thief opened the package the wrong way."

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    155. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person involved in a crime is responsible for anything bad that happens. If you break into a house, even if you didn't mean to kill anyone, if someone dies of a heart attack because they were startled, you're responsible. Same kind of situation. Now you just have to convince a jury.

      Anyway, what if he created the glitter bomb for this own amusement and it just so happens that someone stole it. Hell, in some states it's legal to hunt a person down and kill them if they stole your stuff. Read about so many legal cases where someone stole someone's purse or something and the person chased them and shot them and it was 100% legal.

    156. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You are aware that "the media" doesn't require registration. Simply publishing something makes you "the media". Yes, a much-maligned blogger (or vlogger, etc.) is "the media".

      No, they are not. Now, you and I might believe that a blogger is an equally valid journalist to one working for a major newspaper, but they are not treated the same way. Pretending they are is begging for failure.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    157. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's a good cause, so it means that laser printer toner in various colors would also be ok. And it's harder to get rid of than glitter.

      Toner is both toxic and irritating, it would definitely not be OK. Much of it is carcinogenic, you could be done for trying to give them cancer. The glitter is great because it's something that people already rub all over their bodies without ill effects beyond damage to carpets and relationships.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    158. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. There is sufficient knowledge these days that someone could study from waking until sleep every fat of their life, and still be ignorant. Clearly, that wouldn't be willful.

      But more to the point: people here use the term over knowledge that is in dispute. That's not ignorance at all, it's politics.

    159. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      As someone already posted, a criminal cannot profit from a crime, so any winnings would have been seized immediately.

      He was never convicted of a crime.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    160. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sure, when the facts disagree with you, blame the hate facts!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    161. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's on camera is hypothetical theatre.

    162. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live in California where criminals have more rights than you or I do, any judge you bring this to is going to laugh you right out of court. Then they are going to arrest you.

      Yes, your honor, I not only tresspassed upon private property, but I also engaged in criminal behavior by stealing items from said location.

      Upon opening the package, I was covered in glitter against my will and the inside of my car smells like shit.

      I would like to press charg. . . why are you laughing at me ?

      Yes, your honor, I understand had I not engaged in the aforementioned criminal activity we would not be having this conversation.

      How DARE someone pick on the poor criminals after the police told them ( even with video evidence ) that it wasnâ(TM)t worth their time.

      Also, since Banks use exploding dye packs for the idiots dumb enough to take them, I have serious doubts anyone is going to take your glitter issue seriously.

      Personally, I would have used a smoke bomb / pepper gas combo. Both non-lethal ( thus not considered a booby trap ) but far more effective.

      TLDR: No one is going to have any sympathy for thugs.

      We could really cut crime if we just murdered all the fucking boomer trash, don't you agree?

    163. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a door step robber, aren't You?

      Go ahead and sue but get rid of all the other stuff you stole first. As sn officer of the court your lawyer still has an obligation to report any unlawful activity in which you are engaging.

    164. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ignorance is deliberate by definition, you have to ignore knowledge to be ignorant

      Wow, I did not know that!

    165. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not legal in any state to use violence to recover property. The "castle doctrine" is directed at personal safety. Somebody stealing shit off your porch does not give you the right to shoot them.

    166. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Spraying anybody with glitter against their will is assault.

      Nope. Assault requires intent to cause bodily harm.

      https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/assault

    167. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      This is also how you get jury members thinking the defendant should get off because they already suffered more than they should for a given crime. I have had to deal with this, and it can be highly biased based on the age and color of the defendant.

      Sadly you are correct. At it's core a democracy is only as good as its citizens. That's why I rail, in vain, against mass immigration of uneducated people from other cultures. Want to ensure more violence and crime - just import tons of uneducated people from cultures with lots of violence and crime.

    168. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Criminals trespassing on someone's property to steal stuff have sued when they get injured and won the case. So your statement does not hold up to past court cases.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    169. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What if the package that was stolen had peanut butter in it and the person was deathly alergic ? Think they are going to be able to sue then ?

      Mission Impossible: Fallout the original script:
      Apostles steal nuclear fuel and get radiation poisoning. The rest of the move plays out in the courts where they sue the US government.

    170. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That's not how due process works. Judges exist for a reason.

    171. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by dave420 · · Score: 1

      They're not criminals until a judge says they are. Vigilantism isn't helping anyone.

    172. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Actually, in many states it gives exactly that right. Texas is one state. I believe Florida is another.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    173. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would mean he didn't set up a four camera, internet streaming rig and then put it outside where he could lose it.
      Video sucked, glitter was non adhesive.

    174. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why lie? It wasn't your friend, it wasn't a thief and it never happened. You are deliberately misremembering an accident where a kid fell through the skylight while goofing off in a school roof - a roof the kid shouldn't be on, but that the school was warned about previously.

      So, lgw, you are a liar and a fool.

    175. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you live in a trailer park, talk about it being a high crime area, and then bitch about other people.

      If it is a trailer.... Park it legally in a low crime area. Otherwise you live in a low income, rural, housing project, just like "those" people.

      It would be more productive to set up a couple of camera around the bait box, let them steal the box, and then turn in the camera footage, angled for face and license plate shots. Turn those in to a cop for an easy collar.

      Or work with the postal worker, tell him where to put the box you mail and it is felony mail theft with camera ready package placement.

      Or just be a whiny bitch on slashdot. Your choice.

    176. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about lgw is he is a lonely liar, who makes up stories based on fragments of things he read, inserts himself into the story and gets all the key details wrong.

      It reminds me that time my friend was landing the space shuttle and some black goo climbed in, and then my friend was all covered in this black goo and hearing voices, and they said Obama was a Kenyan....

    177. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

      Good point.
      Put it on someone else's porch.

    178. Re:One big lawsuit waiting to happen by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      Big Laugh. Thank you.

    179. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Now confirmed fake by the creator...

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    180. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We could really cut crime if we just murdered all the fucking boomer trash, don't you agree?

      Only if we remove murder from the books!

    181. Re: One big lawsuit waiting to happen by agm · · Score: 1

      Where is this craziness happening? It wouldn't happen where I live (New Zealand).

  2. The best/worst part? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best/worst part, depending on your perspective, is how most of the package thieves don't seem to realize the lesson.

  3. but why ? by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ? Where I live, the delivery guys ring the door bell, hands over the package, and takes my name and signature as proof of delivery.

    What happens if the package gets stolen ? Does UPS pay you back ?

    1. Re:but why ? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If it is Amazon they will refund you or ship you another item. Sometimes they reship only to an Amazon locker though or require a signature on the reshipped item. Another reason that Amazon is taking over: better customer service.

    2. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the UPS man rings the doorbell. However, when I'm at work, I don't answer the door, and a large fraction of Americans have jobs. So, either the package guys work decent hours and leave packages on the doorstep, or they get paid more to work shitty hours and you have to be home to get your package. We have culturally chosen the former.

    3. Re:but why ? by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's acceptable because no one is home to receive the package.

      Sometimes I have packages sent to work, but inevitably they'll try for a Saturday or Sunday delivery so it's a bit of game of roulette. Sometimes I send them to my retired parents' address who have a greater chance of being home, but they live thirty miles away and their home is even more exposed if they're not around to receive the packages directly, so it's also imperfect.

      I'd like to see the United States Postal Inspection Service, a law-enforcement entity in its own right, expanded to cover these sorts of crimes even if the shipper is not the USPS, and for the crime of stealing packages to have the same penalties as exists for stealing mail.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re: but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Out where we live, it's more a risk that the raccoons will chew a way into the box and have a litter of kits in it.

    5. Re:but why ? by Bigbutt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hah! Where I live, I can be standing at the window looking at the FedEx guy as he runs up, puts a "no one home" sticker on the door and scurries away. That's assuming he got the right house in the first place. UPS just drops the package at the front door. My girlfriend's present was left like that. We're in the house and later I step outside for something and there's the package :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get all my stuff delivered to work.

    7. Re:but why ? by Anrego · · Score: 2

      Shipping companies did the math, and determined that under a certain value it's cheaper to just leave the package and pay for the occasional stolen one than it is to attempt re-delivery.

      The shipper can stipulate that someone must sign for the package and that the carrier can't just leave it. As the receiver you can waive this in advance, but then you assume the liability of the package getting stolen.

    8. Re:but why ? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ?

      Chances are they are making the same risk/reward decision that you are, but they live in a slightly less dodgy neighborhood.

      When I lived in NYC, there is no way in hell they would have left a package on a doorstep. Out in suburbia, it is common. This is simply because the risk/reward ratio is different. I was lucky and my building had a doorman - but for people without that luxury, ordering stuff online can be a lot less convenient. Amazon does reimburse you for stolen packages... I had a roll of duct tape stolen from my doorstep. No, I don't normally order duct tape, but sometimes you need a filler item to get free/expedited shipping and Amazon is whacky so they shipped it separately. I once had a very large, heavy package delivered and I caught a guy in a rough pick-up truck cruising by my house verrrrry slooowwwwly. As soon as I pulled up, he accelerated away quickly. Other neighbors have had stuff taken as well, but I guess not to the extent that Amazon won't ship without a signature.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon forces the merchant to pay for anything that's stolen off your porch. It's in the contract. It's not Amazon that's shipping you a replacement. How do you think Jeff made all of his money, by giving it away?

    10. Re: but why ? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      You need to get home more.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    11. Re:but why ? by aitikin · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the United States Postal Inspection Service, a law-enforcement entity in its own right, expanded to cover these sorts of crimes even if the shipper is not the USPS, and for the crime of stealing packages to have the same penalties as exists for stealing mail.

      It does...when it's the postal service. USPIS doesn't have any say over FedEx or UPS. Additionally, as someone who's day job involves a shit ton of shipping to end users, people assume that they're never going to have this issue come up. I make it a point to try to ship to hold locations, especially now that FedEx has one inside pretty much every Walgreens, for any products that are extremely valuable and they can't be home to sign for it.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    12. Re:but why ? by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      It's acceptable because no one is home to receive the package.

      That does NOT make it acceptable to simply leave a package in full view of the street.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    13. Re:but why ? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not always because nobody is home. Some delivery drivers are either too lazy or too overworked to ring a doorbell and wait for an answer. I've been home many times knowing that a package was going to be delivered only to receive a "delivered" text message without a doorbell ringing. I look outside and the package is there, easy prey for a package thief.

      Occasionally, I've had things delivered that require signatures. With some delivery companies, this will result in an automatic "sorry we missed you" note on the door and me needing to drive down to the local center to get the package - even if I was home at the time. No ringed doorbell or anything. The driver just prints out a quick "missed you" note and sticks it to the door rather than "waste time" ringing the doorbell and waiting the 1 minute for me to get to the door and sign his pad. (Yes, we've complained and no nothing changed.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    14. Re:but why ? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Correct. But Amazon does the shipping in these cases. And Amazon is sometimes the merchant too. Jeff isn't stupid.

    15. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Canada and they normally leave somewhat valuable packages. Theft hasn't been a problem in my area. Most shippers ask for signatures over some dollar amount, not exactly sure what it is - for my Macbook Pro they needed a signature for example.

    16. Re:but why ? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ?

      Because we like to live in a world where we feel safe without having to take extra precautions. There are still places where people don't lock their doors and leave their keys in their cars in case a neighbor needs to borrow it in an emergency.
      That should be the standard, not an exception.

    17. Re:but why ? by taustin · · Score: 1

      Personally, I (and everyone I work with) get packages delivered to work, where there are people's whose job it is to sign for such, and get it to the right person. Not everyone can do that, of course, but it's generally pretty easy to find some kind of alternative to leaving it on the doorstep.

    18. Re: but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so much this. I've called the shipping company when I get an attempted delivery notice after I watched the driver pull up then drive away without interaction. I've gotten "redelivery" later that evening after those instances

    19. Re:but why ? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Another reason that Amazon is taking over: better customer service.

      Hahahaha... oh wait, were you serious? Their customer service has gotten markedly worse over the past 1-2 years.

      Just look at the extra steps you need to go through now to report a problem.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    20. Re:but why ? by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Yep. I'm glad I live in an area where one house doesn't even close the garage door at night. I've been to the store and somebody left their lights on, but the windows down so I reached in and helped them out by turning off their lights so they didn't come back to a dead battery. The real shame is that we find it acceptable to live in a world where we have to assume there are assholes and thieves everywhere.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    21. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because civilization is a society based on trust. Break that trust and, well, there used to be actual consequences. Now society just pays the bill in the form of insurance and costs of doing business (higher prices).

    22. Re:but why ? by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ?

      Because paying someone to make repeated attempts at delivery costs money, and the shipping companies charge that back to the customer for requiring a signature.

      It's "acceptable" because for most items, the collective cost of the signature service is probably more than then collective cost of shipping replacements.

      If it's costing you an extra $2 each for 10k packages a day, you need to lose $20k to theft before it makes sense to switch to requiring signatures for everything. It would probably take a 5% theft rate for that to happen (more, if you cherry-pick the expensive stuff and just require a signature for that), and I doubt it's that high.

    23. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with some services now they've partnered with some stores where you can have it delivered there for you to pick up instead (FedEx does this with Walgreens in our area) but it was only if you weren't home to sign that suddenly you're given the option on the "we missed you sticker" to go online and tell them which store to leave it at instead.

    24. Re: but why ? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      You need to get home more.

      Said the slashdotter to the tourist.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    25. Re:but why ? by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Dunno about fedex, but with UPS you can sign up for "MyChoice", and then tell them to hold it for pickup (this is also how you pre-emptively sign for the package).

      It works pretty well. When you sign up they mail you a pin number that you have to enter (to prove you actually live there), then from that point any package destined for you shows up on the website right away, so no need to wait for a door sticker. You can also apparently pay COD in advance as well, but I haven't had to do that yet.

    26. Re:but why ? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Where I live we use these things called a fence. I know it's a strange foreign technology to Americans but it really helps.

    27. Re:but why ? by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ?

      Because you shouldn't have to worry about someone stealing from you, even if it's out in the open.

      Why do people find it acceptable for the police to not investigate these crimes? Hopefully the GPS and video evidence is enough to persuade them to press charges this time. However, I suspect the police are too concerned with crimes that generate revenue for the department, like traffic violations.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    28. Re:but why ? by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ? Where I live, the delivery guys ring the door bell, hands over the package, and takes my name and signature as proof of delivery.

      What happens if the package gets stolen ? Does UPS pay you back ?

      and if you're not home? most people don't want to wait for redlivery considering they usually work during mail delivery. this "leaving the package by the front door" thing isn't new by any means. and it's certainly not offensively unacceptable as you seem to imply it is. Maybe we need to rethink it but people find it acceptable because this is how mail works.

      --
      Just another second banana
    29. Re:but why ? by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      Then we'd all appreciate you coming over here and explaining that to all the package delivery companies. They do not believe what you believe.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    30. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, those places will be culturally enriched so enough.

    31. Re:but why ? by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Why do you find it acceptable that we live in a society where you can't leave a package on your doorstep?

    32. Re:but why ? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Because paying someone to make repeated attempts at delivery costs money....

      That's like saying, "Because it hurts when I punch myself in the face."

      If they didn't want to make repeated attempts at delivery, they wouldn't show up at 10am on a weekday 3 days in a row. The shipping companies seem to think that nobody in the entire fucking US has a job. I don't really understand where they got this notion, but somehow they did.

      What's maddening is that they know damn well whether or not someone answered the door for every package that requires a signature. It would be fairly trivial to build a profile of when it's reasonable to expect someone to be home at every single house they've delivered to more than a few times. It would be harder, but not that hard, to design routes and organize shipments to hit the people most likely to be home at any given time.

      But no. We'll just stick to trying 3 times in the middle of the work week, and then shipping it to a warehouse on the other side of town for us to drive to to pick up our "delivery".

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    33. Re:but why ? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      There are still places where people don't lock their doors and leave their keys in their cars in case a neighbor needs to borrow it in an emergency.

      Unrelated, but don't do this with the newer car keys which unlock the doors by proximity ('keyless entry"). They can sense when they're inside the car rather than outside, and will not unlock the doors when you touch the handle from the outside (otherwise a mugger chasing you would be able to open the doors you just locked). Many of these cars will also auto-lock the doors after a certain period of time (it assumes you're inside getting ready to go somewhere). Resulting in the key being locked inside with no way to get in unless you have a spare key. And calling a locksmith to break in to these newer car locks is either futile or a lot more expensive.

      https://www.civicx.com/threads/locked-my-keys-in-my-keyless-entry-vehicle-smh.19760/"
      https://www.reddit.com/r/mazda3/comments/3cd8ax/locked_keys_in_car_keyless_fob_sitting_in_the/
      https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/car-locked-fob-inside-what-do-you-do

    34. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see the United States Postal Inspection Service, a law-enforcement entity in its own right, expanded to cover these sorts of crimes even if the shipper is not the USPS

      No you don't, not if you've ever waited in line at a USPS office before... it's much like the dreaded DMV.

    35. Re:but why ? by EnOne · · Score: 1

      Most of us don't live in a neighborhood where you have to lock down everything you own and put bars on your windows. I have sent multiple messages to FedEx, USPS and UPS asking them to leave the packages on my front porch.

      If you are paranoid put up a small bush or large planter on your front porch. Then delivery people will put your packages behind it so the package can't be seen from the street.

      --
      Calvin:Do you believe in the devil? Hobbes:I'm not sure man needs the help.
    36. Re:but why ? by Fringe · · Score: 2
      You're victim-blaming. You should be asking, why isn't it legal to attack a thief? Why don't we prosecute and imprison criminals (people who commit crimes), regardless of their background?

      It's telling that so many comments refer to the chance that he'll be sued... while the cops don't care about addressing the crime even with the GPS and the camera video of the thief.

    37. Re:but why ? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the United States Postal Inspection Service, a law-enforcement entity in its own right, expanded to cover these sorts of crimes even if the shipper is not the USPS, and for the crime of stealing packages to have the same penalties as exists for stealing mail.

      Actually, I think he stumbled upon what might work to get the police involved. The device recorded its location via GPS and uploaded it in real time. In several cases, the thief took it to their home before opening it. That plus the video clearly showing the thief's face makes it pretty much an open and shut case if the police wanted to prosecute. (The glitter and fart spray being relegated to "encouraging" the thief to dispose of the contraption before they discover they've been tracked and recorded.) The whole thing is basically the package-equivalent of a bait car.

    38. Re:but why ? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2

      Where I live, the delivery guys ring the door bell, hands over the package, and takes my name and signature as proof of delivery.

      Where I live, delivery services have to run throughout the day to get everything delivered, and not many people either work from home or sit around at their house all day waiting for deliveries.

    39. Re:but why ? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Amazon local delivery contractors don't even go that far. They just fling the package at my door or set it by the garage door in full view of the street. Fuck Amazon delivery.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    40. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where I live we use these things called a fence. I know it's a strange foreign technology to Americans but it really helps.

      The type of fence that acts as a defense perimeter, or the type of fence that knowingly buys stolen goods? The later is part of the problem, and the former will end up getting packages left on the sidewalk near the locked gate.

    41. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live, the delivery guys ring the door bell, hands over the package, and takes my name and signature as proof of delivery.

      And deliver it to the nearest post office or equivalent for you to pick it up if you weren't at home during the delivery?

    42. Re:but why ? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      That's really the crux of the matter. Package theft just isn't common enough to be "worth it" for merchants (or police) to fight. It's cheaper for them to simply ship a replacement when it happens, than it is to come up with elaborate schemes to foil it, or even to require a signature and reschedule delivery if nobody is there to sign for the package.

      One guy coming up with a contraption like this and posting a video so millions of victims can vicariously imagine revenge on the thief who wronged them, while there's no change in what merchants or police do, is probably the best way to handle this.

    43. Re:but why ? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Surprised they don't sell you a delivery box. A box big enough for the package, with a lock and a barcode to scan for proof of delivery.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re: but why ? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Do laws involving crimes committed via USPS fully apply if USPS is technically a contractor doing "last-mile" delivery for Amazon/FedEx/UPS?

      My guess is that they do... but only as "local" crimes, not "interstate" crimes, because USPS's responsibility was limited to a cross-town delivery (though there ARE quite a few metro areas that sprawl across state lines & conceivably involve even local packages crossing them). Ex: Kansas City, parts of Florida that have Alabama zipcodes because the PO is in Alabama even though the recipient is in Florida, etc

    45. Re: but why ? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Years ago, FedEx Ground was REALLY BAD about not bothering to even attempt delivery. I had orders from buy.com where I didn't even get a delivery note, and could prove the truck came nowhere near my street (I had cameras recording). Their drivers would refuse to take the package & it would just get automatically flagged in their system as a "failed attempt" (FedEx Ground was formerly RPS, and their drivers could do things FedEx Air & UPS could never get away with). I'm still deeply-prejudiced against FedEx Ground, even though this happened ~15 years ago.

    46. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are poor and live in an area where theft is a problem. I am able to live in an area where I'm not constantly worried about my neighbors stealing from me.

      Looking at your post history, I see you have an Android, LOL.

    47. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call the company and report a package stolen by driver. Say their delivery system reported it as delivered, but you have security cameras proving otherwise. They'll stop doing it to your house.

    48. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have the time to do any of that as they are on the clock and have a far shorter window than even UPS/Fedex so flinging it from their car is the only way to stay on time. I don't even want to know how much they have to speed, especially in residential areas and even school zones, to meet their quotas.

    49. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep ? Where I live, the delivery guys ring the door bell, hands over the package, and takes my name and signature as proof of delivery.

      What happens if the package gets stolen ? Does UPS pay you back ?

      Because, outside of high-crime areas (you know where those are...), the US is about as safe as, say, Switzerland or Japan.

      Seriously, it is.

      Grow some balls and look it up yourself. You'll learn something.

      But it's something that's not allowed to be discussed.

    50. Re:but why ? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      In our more rural subdivision, we have mailboxes on the main road. About 10 or 15 depending on the location. Coming home last night, there are 4 or 5 Amazon boxes sitting on top of the mailboxes or in between the posts. Several months back my girlfriend and I were walking and I spotted a piece of box trash sitting up the hill just a little. I walked up to grab it and it was an unopened package with the address just barely readable. We walked up and gave it to the owner. The wind up here is quite intense at times so it's not unusual to find things blowing across the mountain side if they're not secured.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    51. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's acceptable because no one is home to receive the package.

      That does NOT make it acceptable to simply leave a package in full view of the street.

      Sounds like you want to blame the victim. Those scantily dressed girls were just asking for it. Amirite?

    52. Re:but why ? by Mousit · · Score: 1

      It's acceptable because no one is home to receive the package.

      Sometimes I have packages sent to work, but inevitably they'll try for a Saturday or Sunday delivery so it's a bit of game of roulette. Sometimes I send them to my retired parents' address who have a greater chance of being home, but they live thirty miles away and their home is even more exposed if they're not around to receive the packages directly, so it's also imperfect.

      Not being home is indeed a common issue for so many, but there are existing solutions. UPS and FedEx both have "hold for pickup" options. This isn't great for everyone but the local distribution centers are both on my way home from work, so I'm quite happy to use that option and just grab them on the way. What royally pisses me off, however, is that I am not allowed to use this option with at least 60% of the packages I receive. I've called (when I can't do it from the automated website) and asked about this several times, and I usually get one of just two responses: a) you can only select this after the first delivery attempt fails, which is useless for no-sig packages; b) the seller/shipper has ACTUALLY SPECIFIED THIS ISN'T ALLOWED, which is the one I find even more ludicrous. Amazon is particularly bad for this. It's their "default contract option" one UPS agent told me.

      You'd think shippers and the shipping companies both would be falling all over themselves to allow this. It's secure which is good for the shipper, and it puts the onus on me instead of the shipping company's driver, which saves them manhours and other costs. Yet they make it absurdly difficult or impossible to use this option.

      Eventually I ended up just getting a P.O. box from one of the many companies that offers them with standard mailing addresses (so they don't look like P.O. box addresses, getting around the other issue of companies that don't ship to P.O. boxes), and accepts package deliveries. So basically I'm paying extra out of my own pocket to deal with an issue that has simpler, cheaper (for all parties) solutions. We live in a great society.

    53. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where I live we use these things called a fence. I know it's a strange foreign technology to Americans but it really helps.

      We Americans have been told by our media masters that walls and fences don't work.

    54. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... the USPIS should pick up the tab on policing deliveries by for-profit companies? Effectively a tax-payer subsidy?

    55. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really should be the thieves that get slow roasted in the town square, not us having to lock our doors.
      Make it a REALLY slow roast for ID thieves over the internet.

    56. Re:but why ? by diethelm · · Score: 1

      This is just unfathomable... In the Netherlands, if there is nobody home when they try to deliver, they will knock on your neighbours' doors until one of them receives temporarily the package, and then leave a note in your home saying "your package was delivered to house #123". If no neighbours are available, they will leave the package in one of the shops associated with PostNL (usually within a couple of blocks distance), and you have to go and pick it up yourself. Simple and effective. Nobody here would dream of leaving a package on the doorstep!

    57. Re:but why ? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      The real crime is that the because of the War on Drugs US police forces won't even attempt to pursue property crime.

      It's simply not profitable enough to the police when they can spend all their police time setting up drug stings and seizing everyone's personal property to keep for themselves.

      This is the consequence of for profit policing that the insane civil forfeiture laws created.

    58. Re:but why ? by Okind · · Score: 1

      Why do people find it acceptable that valuable packages are just left on the doorstep?

      Do they have a choice? Enough people like lower prices so much, that for others it's impossible to choose a delivery guarantee.

      Luckily I live in the Netherlands, where the sender is responsible for the shipment until the recipient receives it. And the law specifically states that leaving it on your doorstep does NOT count as "delivered". Sadly this does not solve problems like (falsely) claiming nobody was home, but packages are never left outside for any random passerby to take.

    59. Re:but why ? by dwywit · · Score: 1

      That happens here in Oz. I order and pay for an item - it doesn't get shipped until I pay for it - and the seller puts a"'signature required" note on the docket. Legally, it's not his anymore, but the courier company follows the seller's orders. Won't post to a PO Box, either. Auspost have set up a system where they'll hold parcels - they wanted me to set up an account (everyone wants you to set up an account), they'd give me a special address to use, and they'd take on the "signature required" part.

      The drawback was that they wanted me to supply ID to set up an account for the address and PO box I've been using for 20 years - a driver's licence (OK, I suppose), AND my passport (no way in hell are they getting that). They process passport applications for the passport office, but they don't get to keep the details in their own marketing or services database.

      So I'm stuck with making sure I'm home to receive delivery. Fortunately it's usually the same driver, and I give him free computer advice to keep him sweet.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    60. Re:but why ? by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Then how does the delivery person get in? :) The opportunist thief may act on a whim for a visible package. However, the determined ones follow the trucks at a distance.

    61. Re:but why ? by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      I ge this too, but in reverse. Fedex always knocks here, UPS leaves stuff. USPS also leaves stuff, but we are friends and they know *where* to leave it out of the rain and out of sight. I often feel sorry for the USPS people (rural route here, it's either the guy or his wife) because I sometimes order bulk items from Amazon that are heavy, and they carry that stuff 1/8th mile to a covered porch if I don't intercept them to help.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    62. Re: but why ? by aitikin · · Score: 1

      USPS is a federal agency and therefore under the jurisdiction of federal law, even if the package doesn't cross state lines. If I send mail through the post office to my neighbor next door and it gets stolen from my neighbor's mailbox, it's a federal crime, even though it didn't leave my town.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    63. Re: but why ? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The US Postal Service is explicitly authorized in the Constitution as a federal service; interfering with it does not need an "interstate commerce" nexus in order to qualify as a federal crime.

    64. Re:but why ? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That seems dumb. Toyota/Lexus will not allow you to lock the car from the outside with the key fob inside if the battery in it is still working, and it doesn't auto-lock until you're in gear.

    65. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be the standard, not an exception.

      Yes, and we all want free food, free electricity, and we all want to live forever... Y'know what? That should be the standard not the exception. Why, by golly, there aught to be a law!

    66. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EX-USPS ARC here, (Assistant Rural Carrier) So build a lock box that package carriers can leave your packages in and they can lock for you.

      I tried to hide packages the best I could but most times on the porch (If they even had one) was the only place there was. Unmarked houses, mail boxes, streets, your lucky you get mail at all. And ring the door bell? Many don't have them, or they don't work and I had one customer with a large note saying Don't ring or knock or hang bags on the door knob. Mail/package delivery is piece work and you need to make so many stops per hour, (About 15/20) that you can't get your load off the truck in time if you have to look for safe place at each stop.
      So yes, its run to the front, drop the package and run back to the truck and hit the gas.

    67. Re:but why ? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we all want free food, free electricity,

      Getting rid of money has been a dream of many, for a long time.
      From each according to ability, to each according to need.

      we all want to live forever...

      No, we all don't want that.
      Once your contribution to those who share your genes no longer outweighs your burden on them, it's time to die. And if I die sooner than that, it's no big deal - being dead is no hardship at all.

    68. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to leaving a note saying "please let us know when we can deliver your package, or alternatively swing by our depot $ADDRESS between 8 and 5?"

    69. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live we use these things called a fence. I know it's a strange foreign technology to Americans but it really helps.

      You have a guy to sell the stolen merchandise for you? You must steal lots of stuff to need a fence.

    70. Re:but why ? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Our postal service offers those things, for a fairly affordable fee. They're quite common in apartment houses now, and unless a bunch of people receive packages at the same time and ain't home (read: like right now before Christmas) there's rarely collisions with no room in the drop boxes. It works pretty well and takes care of package theft.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    71. Re:but why ? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't complain to the delivery service, complain to the merchant that the package never arrived. Soon they'll start avoiding using that delivery service.

      Say what you want, the most reliable delivery system around here is still the old postal service. Screw the rest.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    72. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we like to live in a world where we feel safe without having to take extra precautions.

      Lol!!! Then why do you feel the need to carry guns?

    73. Re:but why ? by antdude · · Score: 1

      In my area, leave at the front door, ring the door bell, and leave. You have to tell the deliverer in advanced to get signature as proof of delivery if you want that.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    74. Re:but why ? by skegg · · Score: 1

      Yup: I've been home and later found the "Sorry we missed you" in the letterbox.

      Sorry my butt.

    75. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to make some sacrifices for Diversity! Diversity Is Our Strength!

    76. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, we all don't want that.
      > Once your contribution to those who share your genes no longer outweighs your burden on them, it's time to die.

      Maybe that's time for *you* to die. Not me.

    77. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We decided we'd rather have diversity.

    78. Re:but why ? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It would be fairly trivial to build a profile of when it's reasonable to expect someone to be home at every single house they've delivered to more than a few times.

      Can you imagine the uproar if word of this "burglar database" got out? There are people bent out of shape because Facebook uses your IP address to target ads to your location. Think about a multinational megacorp keeping track of when you are home and when you are not ...

    79. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Netherlands, where I live, packages are never left on the doorstep. If you aren't at home and the package doesn't need a signature they try to leave it with a neighbour and put a note in your letterbox stating where they delivered it. Otherwise they keep the package and try to deliver it the next day. In that case they leave a note with a code you can use to choose a different delivery timeframe online, provided you do that before before the package re-enters the sorting process.

      It's totally unacceptable to leave packages on the doorstep, there are better solutions.

    80. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The driver just prints out a quick "missed you" note and sticks it to the door[...]

      Lucky you. I some times don't even get a note because the guy didn't even showed up and just marked the package as "not home" (false) and for pick up.

    81. Re: but why ? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Because in a civilized place, people don't take shit that doesn't belong to them.

      There are vast swathes of the USA (and, I expect, the world) where people don't lock their doors or their cars, and live their whole lives where nothing ever gets stolen. For generations. When we moved into the house we live in, the exterior locks were skeleton keys, and the previous owners didn't have any...in 40 years they'd never locked up.

      Personally, I believe it's the anonymity of large cities that encourages this sort of "fuck everyone else" behavior. They should be shot or painfully trapped like the annoying vermin they are.

      --
      -Styopa
    82. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's acceptable because no one is home to receive the package.

      That does NOT make it acceptable to simply leave a package in full view of the street.

      Personally I'd rather come home from work and have my package available to use right then and there. Otherwise every time I order something online I will have to wait an extra day and drive 30 minutes to go pick it up. Kind of defeats the purpose of ordering online.

    83. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's stopping someone from just taking the package and still reporting it as stolen?

    84. Re:but why ? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Lol!!! Then why do you feel the need to carry guns?

      Guns are fine for hunting game, in the hands of sober adults.
      Otherwise, I prefer that people (including cops) don't carry them.

    85. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the reincarnation of a honey bee drone.

    86. Re:but why ? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's still better than going into a Walmart and dealing with... whatever that is.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    87. Re:but why ? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Our condo cluster mailbox sets have four of these attached to each cluster. A great idea, but they don't handle large packages. It would be nice if they were made available to UPS and Fedex for small packages. It could generate fee income for USPS.

    88. Re:but why ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The thief is a victim too. Otherwise they wouldn't be stealing. You don't care about addressing root causes, but by paying taxes you're contributing to the upkeep of the system that created these people. You are victim-blaming, and victimizing. Why don't we prosecute and imprison you? Answer, the system is not fair. It's biased towards protecting those who need protection least at the expense of everyone else.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    89. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The thief is a victim too. Otherwise they wouldn't be stealing.

      What horseshit. These people are stealing from porches because they can get away with it – or they could until now.

      They don't need the thing they're stealing, as evidence dby the fact that they don't even know what the fuck it is!

    90. Re:but why ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "They don't need the thing they're stealing, as evidence dby the fact that they don't even know what the fuck it is!"

      Typically stupid argument, coward. You're assuming that people steal things only because they want those things, which is provably false. You thought you'd be clever, and failed. This is my surprised face.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    91. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're really going to defend casual theft in the name of sympathy for the needy? You're an idiot.

    92. Re:but why ? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You're really going to defend casual theft in the name of sympathy for the needy?

      There are all kinds of needs. Not all of them are monetary, but even that is enough to explain package thefts. You go to a store, steal some new clothes so you look like you belong in another neighborhood. Then you go to that neighborhood and steal things, hoping for valuable items which can easily be converted to cash. At least some of these people were in borrowed cars, so we don't in fact know that they have a pot to piss in, or a window to throw it out of. Why is this complicated to you?

      You're an idiot.

      You're a robot. Install some empathy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    93. Re:but why ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USPS postal inspectors don't even bother to investigate postal theft, much less anyone else's. Local police tell me that they have to investigate it, because the postal inspectors refuse.

      Meanwhile who is going to pay them to investigate FedEx theft? FedEx? Maybe you want a tax on all shipments to investigate the thefts?

      The main problem is that there are NO consequences for this kind of theft, especially in California.

    94. Re:but why ? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      What's worse. What you did there would land you in a police car in some places.
      Some people just suck. Fuck 'em.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  4. Saw it this morning by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2

    The only thing I could think of to make it better would be to have a small CO2 canister (like for BB guns), which sends the glitter flying everywhere rather than just around the box.

    Other than that, maybe something even more smelly.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where I live, one neighbor has gotten better. He put a package connected to a wire with a perimeter alarm on it. Thieves tend to run when they hear a gunshot when they try to boost a package, and it gets neighbors to see what is going on. The alarm is harmless but loud, and legal in all 50 states.

    2. Re:Saw it this morning by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would like to see it start shouting "PACKAGE THIEF!" or something else equally loudly that can't be easily turned off, but it would probably end up smashed until it stopped emitting.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Saw it this morning by taustin · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see the indelible dye packets that banks use, but that's probably a bit overboard.

    4. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add another small canister of spray adhesive that the glitter flys through.

    5. Re:Saw it this morning by rjune · · Score: 1

      Rather than the fart smell, how about some cheap perfume. Let the porch pirates explain that to their girlfriends. (One of the thieves was muttering about how his girlfriend would be wondering who was in his car)

    6. Re:Saw it this morning by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Essentially you need "hooker in a bottle" to combine with the glitter. That's going to be a great one to explain to the GF. Toss in some long pink hairs, a fake nail, and and maybe a couple torn edges from a condom.

      Better make sure you clean all that shit up and dispose of it carefully, before she shows up!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:Saw it this morning by GNious · · Score: 1

      The designer is a better human than me - I'd be inclined to use multiple spray to make the area when the box gets opened unlivable.
      Pepper sprays/gels, mace (still available?), whatever, one in each corner.

      Appreciate that people likely steal stuff out of desperation, but....

    8. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see the indelible dye packets that banks use, but that's probably a bit overboard.

      LOL, ever tried to clean up glitter? It really is the next best thing.

      If one of these went off in an enclosed space, you would simply never get the glitter all cleaned out, least of all from anything fabric.

      When we put up our Christmas decorations, we pretty much accept there will be a sheen of glitter everywhere for months, and you are still finding it in the summer.

      I complained about the Christmas glitter to a friend once, and his response was "dude, I have a 7 year old daughter, everything in my house has glitter on it".

      Glitter is forever.

    9. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Appreciate that people likely steal stuff out of desperation, but....

      You'd be surprised how many normal, average people you meet who are not rich but not poor, will just take stuff at random when they think they can get away with it!

      It's like half the population of the U.S. never went to kindergarten and learned the basic rule: "if it's not yours, LEAVE IT ALONE."

    10. Re:Saw it this morning by taustin · · Score: 1

      Glitter may be forever, but having a seven year old daughter isn't a crime. dye packets mark someone has having done something illegal.

    11. Re:Saw it this morning by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Others have mentioned that distributing the glitter in such a fashion could cause physical harm and so he probably deliberately avoided it. That got me thinking about relatively safe things you could do to step it up a notch or three. The first thing I thought of would be to replace the glitter with a few hundred tiny roaches, you could probably buy them from a commercial pet food place. Instead of the fart can I'd go for popping open a can of Surstromming and letting it leak juices everywhere, if you don't want to be bothered spraying it around. The smell from the Surstromming could very well make a car unusable until the upholstery is replaced.

      Although you could also just take a can of Surstromming and relabel it as caviar or something that you expect the thief might want to actually try out, and put it in a box.

    12. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck em, they're thieves. As long as it won't blind them I'd say it's fair.

    13. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      love that idea.

    14. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like skunk spray? I dunno if they sell that, but I’ve heard it basically cannot be washed off.

    15. Re:Saw it this morning by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking concentrated synthetic skunk spray (actually available) and enough propellant to fill a room with it..

    16. Re:Saw it this morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear mace? Bear mace.

  5. *FART SPRAY* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *fart spray* *fart spray* *fart spray*

  6. Fake by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The whole thing is too perfect. Fake.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey look it's Captain America!

    2. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be a mix here, but most the reactions seem fake. Don't trust anyone trying to make money on social media, even if it tickles your nerd parts in all the right ways.

    3. Re:Fake by Yosho · · Score: 2

      Why would he bother faking it? It's easier to actually have a package stolen than it is to convince somebody to willingly cover their car in glitter.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, just pay someone $50 and they will willingly cover their car in glitter. Completely fake.

    5. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just leave the package on your doorstep, and they'll do it for free. What's your point?

    6. Re:Fake by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Because it wouldn't work properly and they wouldn't have footage plus they would lose the device each time which would cost them way more than $50. Damn, people are so naive. Most of Youtube is take. "Why would he bother faking it?". Because money.

    7. Re:Fake by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The whole thing is too perfect. Fake.

      a) You think it's difficult to get a package stolen?

      b) We didn't see all the videos that didn't make the grade.

      --
      No sig today...
    8. Re:Fake by danbert8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except if you watch Rober's other videos, he actually debunks other fake videos on YouTube that go viral. I guarantee you this video is legit. He is an engineer superhero.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    9. Re:Fake by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      Uh, just pay someone $50 and they will willingly cover their car in glitter. Completely fake.

      yeah.... no. Glitter gets everywhere and you cant get rid of it. Most people know this. It's why glitter bombs are even a thing because of how universally annoying it is to everyone who isn't a 12 year old girl. No adult would let you glitter bomb their car for $50. I'm not even sure I or most people would let you do it for a full month's payment. Glitter is just terrible.

      --
      Just another second banana
    10. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's genius in its application. Glitter bomb (WTF?) followed by applications of fart spray lead the thief to GET IT OUT NOW and drive off. I could see the retrieval rate being 80% or higher. I wouldn't want to retrieve it from some miscreant's garbage can though. Good way to get shot.

      captcha: disperse

    11. Re:Fake by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Honestly I'm a bit surprised he had that many packages stolen, but we aren't given a frame of reference either. At least around here it seems a rarity, I've never had it done to me and haven't even heard of anyone I personally know having it done to him. Yet this guy seems to have had a half dozen taken.

    12. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how I know you're a below-average IQ Slashdot postard who didn't watch the video?

    13. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a) You think it's difficult to get a package stolen?"

      I think it's difficult to get HD video back from the robber.

      Don't you?

    14. Re:Fake by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Yeah everything on the internet is completely true. Nobody would ever make fake drama for clicks.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    15. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if the car was near the end anyway. I sold my last car to the scrapyard for $100 (and they towed it too) and I would have happily endured glitter and a stinkbomb for another $50.

      But I'm not claiming to be an adult.

    16. Re:Fake by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It's almost as if you didn't watch the video you're discussing.

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:Fake by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Even if I'm naive, at least I watched the video, which you obviously didn't.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  7. Amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone found a practical use for the ihomepod.

  8. Re:The News we see tomorrow will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of his "victims" had a multi-thousand dollar bike in his room.

  9. Mostly Harmless by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I think he's pretty safe - he could always claim he left it out as a prank for a friend, and the thief got in the way. For something like this intent would matter.

    Also he was smart in that it spread the glitter horizontally, not upward - again not putting it into the face of whoever opened the box.

    The funny thing to me is that the thieves did have something pretty valuable since it had four phones with service plans, if they'd juts literally held their nose they could have had a bounty.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Mostly Harmless by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      he could always claim he left it out as a prank for a friend, and the thief got in the way

      Not any more he can't.

    2. Re: Mostly Harmless by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah ... He could claim that. It isn't as though there is any evidence widely available that he designed it specifically as retribution against theives. (As usual, you are an idiot saying phenomenally stupid shit.)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re: Mostly Harmless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 70's I dumped a box of paper tape chads in a friend's car windshield heater vent. Quite the mess when he turned the windshield defroster on - for months! But harmless to the person. Paper confetti could be used with little risk.

    4. Re:Mostly Harmless by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I wonder what Rober would have done if they had kept it. He has their address. Cops won't do anything.

    5. Re:Mostly Harmless by sjames · · Score: 1

      people have been putting out packages like that since at least the late '70s. The first one I remember was a spring loaded garbage ejector loaded with old tomatoes and such. I've seen a few on the news over the years but I've never heard of anyone getting into any sort of legal trouble for it.

  10. maybe even jail / prison time by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    maybe even jail / prison time

  11. Sales Opportunity by apoc.famine · · Score: 5, Funny

    He should sell these on Amazon.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    1. Re:Sales Opportunity by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      And then they get delivered and stolen ?

    2. Re:Sales Opportunity by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      ...and the cycle continues

  12. Very considerate by joh · · Score: 2

    Others would have rigged some tear gas canister or an explosive device with a few handfuls of shrapnel. Glitter and fart spray is effective enough and at the same time whimsical enough to get away with it.

    1. Re:Very considerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others would have rigged some tear gas canister or an explosive device with a few handfuls of shrapnel. Glitter and fart spray is effective enough and at the same time whimsical enough to get away with it.

      Not just considerate, but smart. If you'd plant an explosive device and injure someone, your time in jail would probably not be worth the satisfaction...

    2. Re:Very considerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of the fart sprays are REALLY bad. these were probably staged because nobody was vomiting or dry heaving

    3. Re:Very considerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nice canister of thermite would have been great as well.

    4. Re:Very considerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others would have rigged some tear gas canister or an explosive device with a few handfuls of shrapnel.

      Do you want to be charged for murder/harming another person?

      (being private property in plain site and easily accessible doesn't absolve you from those charges)

    5. Re:Very considerate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there will be people who use fireworks and shrapnel - as even glitter can be shrapnel if an idiot overdoes it. Look up Mantrap (Snare) on Wikipedia.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantrap_(snare)

  13. Would have worked better with a 12-gauge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would certainly cut down on package theft.

    Unfortunately with the legal fallout probably no one would do this, but I think the entertainment value and the satisfaction would b worth it...

    1. Re:Would have worked better with a 12-gauge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would certainly cut down on package theft.

      So would pipe bombs.... Just sayin'.

    2. Re:Would have worked better with a 12-gauge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would certainly be a great deterrent. But unfortunately the potential collateral damage caused by these mechanisms is too great to justify their use.
      What if they bring their packet into a place like a kindergarten before opening it? Then not only the asshole who deserves it gets blown up but possibly a lot of unrelated and innocent people get hurt or killed as well.

    3. Re:Would have worked better with a 12-gauge! by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      That would certainly cut down on package theft.

      Unfortunately with the legal fallout probably no one would do this, but I think the entertainment value and the satisfaction would b worth it...

      There are videos where people do this. Long before him this other guy made a video where he used shotgun shells to make bangs when people lift up the package. It wasn't as over engineered as this one but it was very satisfactory. He even sold packages so you could do it yourself if I recall.

      --
      Just another second banana
  14. Novel Approach by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

    The device he created for distributing the glitter was a work of genius. Watch the videos, it is an amazing and beautiful creation.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Novel Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....a balloon filled with glitter then inflated will easily distribute glitter when poped and doesn't really take any engineering to do, this is an old old school prank.

    2. Re:Novel Approach by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Glitter bloom!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Novel Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....a balloon filled with glitter then inflated will easily distribute glitter when poped and doesn't really take any engineering to do, this is an old old school prank.

      That would require an air canister to inflate to pop or would require a larger package and foolproof popping method that occurs after the package is fully revealed. No, I like his solution much better. It's much more complicated to construct but easy to reload, easy to trigger, and very compact.

    4. Re:Novel Approach by c · · Score: 1

      I suspect he might have achieved better spread and more glitter using a small CO2 cylinder. Maybe in 2.0.

      I also think the fart spray could have been much more effective if it doused the surrounding area with a liquid.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re:Novel Approach by Thelasko · · Score: 2

      I suspect he might have achieved better spread and more glitter using a small CO2 cylinder. Maybe in 2.0.

      Doubtful. The device looks similar to a broadcast spreader, which is where I'm guessing he got his inspiration. There's a reason that design is popular for landscaping. It achieves very even results. A CO2 cylinder would likely result in a shotgun pattern, which will end up covering a much smaller area.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:Novel Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would require a pope.

  15. Doctor Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doctor Who also proposed a way to deal with such thieves... (spoilers for series 11/season 37)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xY0v8da4ovU

    1. Re:Doctor Who by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      but that could also harm the intended recipient, or is that a spoiler

  16. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's all faked for click revenue as well.

    But, it is entertaining.

    I'm amused at the perpetrator responses.'Come on, Bro.' ' Aw hell naw'

  17. But who was his former employer? by infuriatedweasel · · Score: 1, Informative

    Having not RTFA, I'm wondering where this guy used to work years ago. Seems like that'd be relevant and they could repeat it over and over to get a ton of mileage out of it.

    1. Re:But who was his former employer? by shess · · Score: 1

      I love when the trolling is deep enough that people rate it "Informative".

  18. Re: The News we see tomorrow will be by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Troll

    Can't wait for him to be accused of racism for targeting so many minorities.

  19. Karma++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot express how thoroughly I enjoyed this video. Well done, Mark. Well done.

  20. They also have no claim by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Right - not anymore. But the people in the video also have shown they are not hurt at all so they couldn't claim harm at this point...

    I'm talking more for future scenarios if someone would be liable if one o the thieves held onto the device and wanted to sue.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. Re:Great job asshat by TWX · · Score: 2

    In this particular case, worth it.

    Though I wish that there was a practical means of spraying out ground-up crayon wax, something that would embed itself into the fabric and melt into place. Unfortunately it would probably congeal while sitting on the porch.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  22. Doctor Who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then let's get rid of the evidence by doing it the Doctor Who way! (spoilers for series 11/season 37)

  23. Re: Great job asshat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Co2 cartridge propelling magenta laser printer toner.

  24. Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yep, felony theft limit varies by state, but is just $500 to $1000 - even if those are cheaper Android phones that package probably goes over the limit.

    So you can claim damages, but also get a felony theft rap... hmm.

    If someone already had a felony theft charge previously though, I wonder if it would be as much a deterrent.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      If someone already had a felony theft charge previously though, I wonder if it would be as much a deterrent.

      Three strikes...?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to some cops I know, in Texas it is now $5000 for a felony. :(

    3. Re:Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a package has three $200 phones in it then the thief either committed three thefts of goods each of which is valued at $200 or one theft of goods at $600. The problem here is that the crime could only occur because he set up the situation for it to occur so that someone could get charged with felony theft. It also would mean you set up a situation to expend court time that wasn't necessary.

    4. Re: Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail theft is a federal crime. It could be a $5 package but still result in a felony conviction.

      It won't, though, because the police force in densely populated areas where such crimes are prevalent simply don't care.

    5. Re:Yep - just $500-$1000 for felony by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Yep, felony theft limit varies by state, but is just $500 to $1000 - even if those are cheaper Android phones that package probably goes over the limit.

      So you can claim damages, but also get a felony theft rap... hmm.

      If someone already had a felony theft charge previously though, I wonder if it would be as much a deterrent.

      I can tell you it's only $100 in my state. I know because I was on the grand jury and we were brought felony theft cases. A lot of my Amazon packages would be felony theft.

  25. Maybe Amazon should give a CHOICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is UPS/FEDEX leave deliveries at the door, if there is no one to pickup them.

    BUT USPS workers, on the other hand, leave a note (in customer mailbox) for customer to come to the Post Office & pickup their delivery! (Which, IMHO, is a practical solution for most people; UNLIKE WHAT UPS/FEDEX DOES!!!)

    So how about UPS & FEDEX give people choice to pickup delivery from their offices?
    (They often don't give such choice!!!)

    OR, how about Amazon enable people to (always) choose, exactly, which delivery company will bring their package:
    UPS?
    FEDEX?
    USPS?

    1. Re:Maybe Amazon should give a CHOICE! by aitikin · · Score: 1

      UPS/FedEx both give the shipper the option to require a signature for delivery. Upon not being able to deliver within the first 3 days, they'll hold at local location for another 3 business days.

      That all being said, my USPS delivery person has been dropping packages off as much or more than the FedEx/UPS guys, so not sure what you're referencing there.

      Also, as someone who ships multi-thousand dollar shipments on the regular that are not simple sizes, I would never give the client the option of USPS for these unless they're going to an APO/DPO type address. The things I've regularly seen done via the postal service scare me, and the price of shipping is insane (IE, shipping this from the midwest to California costs me roughly $40 via FedEx and UPS (one just over $40, the other just under), but priority Mail will cost $121).

      If the customer wants it through the postal service, I warn them that I don't recommend it, the other carriers are usually quicker and offer better tracking, but if you want it, you're paying the difference between the cheapest shipping and the postal service. Most people don't even ask to, but every once in a while someone does and I give them the option of paying $80 more for it (in this example) and they choose FedEx or UPS.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    2. Re: Maybe Amazon should give a CHOICE! by edris90 · · Score: 1

      UPS does have an option they just don't advertise it because too many people do it will have to increase shipping cost to account for it. Have it shipped to the customer pickup center address. they don't have any policies against allowing a customer to do that and so are they may be slightly surprised, still your name on the package so they can still release it to you. It's more of a pain in the ass not to release it to you . nobody is trying to add problems into their day

    3. Re:Maybe Amazon should give a CHOICE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tells me your neighborhood had a lot of USPS thefts, so they had to start leaving notes instead of the packages - around here every carrier still just leaves it at your doorstep/porch/garage. It all depends on your area's crime rate.

  26. Poopy Diapers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thatâ(TM)s what Iâ(TM)ve packed the boxes with after having hey similar doorstep disappearance in the past.

  27. Biting back... with a sign by mileshigh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More booby-trapped packages in general might dissuade casual thieves. Ditto for law enforcement.

    Meanwhile, thanks for doing the hard work and getting the publicity, Mark. Now, all I have to do to discourage theft is to put up a sign that says "Warning: packages may explode" with suitable graphic.

    Seriously, what happened to the police's "broken windows" policy? I thought they were now supposed to investigate and prosecute small offenses like this to a) create a culture of obeying the law, and b) make citizens feel like the cops have their backs so they don't go vigilante. Which is what happened in this case.

    1. Re:Biting back... with a sign by Fringe · · Score: 1

      It's considered racist, because it was mostly applied in minority communities (areas with broken windows, graffiti, etc., which tend to be less of a problem in wealthier areas) and the arrested were disproportionately minorities. Google ""broken windows" racist" to have your faith in civilization diminished.

    2. Re:Biting back... with a sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The police where I live are nothing more than ticket enforcers and number plate trackers. Resolving actual crimes is not even on their list of things to do anymore.

    3. Re:Biting back... with a sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, who thinks the cops have your back? They'd rather put someone in jail for having a joint, than try to go after someone stealing someone's $5 amazon package.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Problem is that packages are exposed. by shess · · Score: 1

    A lot of the solutions seem to involve giving Amazon drivers access to your home (shudder), or a heavy metal dropbox with keys and the like ... I find myself wondering if you'd solve 90% or more of the problem by simply having a box to dump things in without any sort of smarts or security. These people come by and see a package, and then are in-and-out quickly. They presumably aren't as interested in walking up and digging around on your porch three times a day just in case there's a package.

    Of course, delivery people ain't got time to put a package in a box, so most likely they'd just leave the package on top of or in front of the box.

    1. Re:Problem is that packages are exposed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "delivery people ain't got time to put a package in a box"

      Sounds like an interesting DIY project/product opportunity. Make a plastic tote that has a simple mechanism integrated into the lid. When a package is placed on top of the lid a counterweight/gas piston slowly opens the lid and drops the package onto a foam pad in the tote and then closes back up. Extra points for fancier mechanisms that reset/"charge" themselves with the energy from opening/closing the lid to retrieve the packages. On the flip side you could simply have a box with no lid, maybe a net in the bottom in case some delivery people thought they were basketball players making a shot.

    2. Re:Problem is that packages are exposed. by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

      A lot of the solutions seem to involve giving Amazon drivers access to your home (shudder), or a heavy metal dropbox with keys and the like ... I find myself wondering if you'd solve 90% or more of the problem by simply having a box to dump things in without any sort of smarts or security. These people come by and see a package, and then are in-and-out quickly. They presumably aren't as interested in walking up and digging around on your porch three times a day just in case there's a package.

      Of course, delivery people ain't got time to put a package in a box, so most likely they'd just leave the package on top of or in front of the box.

      interestingly enough I DO have such a hidden package area. to the left of my door along the wall is the mail slot but the entire wall is actually a door that opens up so it's a cubby for large packages. The problem is I still get packages left between my screen door and my front door. Not sure how to train my mailmen to leave it in the cubby without leaving large obvious notes that would be seen by any one walking by.

      --
      Just another second banana
    3. Re:Problem is that packages are exposed. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Of course, delivery people ain't got time to put a package in a box, so most likely they'd just leave the package on top of or in front of the box.

      Ding ding ding! We have a winner!

      Our neighborhood has had some slight issues with package theft, and when we moved in our porch was one of the more exposed ones. There's nothing to hide anything behind. Expecting a fair number of packages for the holidays, we bought a couple big greenery displays, and also got a shitty plastic bit of porch furniture, which is a brown bench with a large storage area in it. We put the bench diagonally across the corner of the porch, so things can also be dropped behind it.

      To date, a dozen packages have been delivered, and only 2 were hidden in any sort of way. I think we only lost one, and hopefully those thieves did something good with their $7 of birdseed.

      Putting a note on the door doesn't seem to help, because ain't nobody got time for reading either!

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    4. Re:Problem is that packages are exposed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the solution is for delivery drivers to be required to knock on the door, and wait and hand the package to someone, or else they try re-delivery the next day! At the end of August I moved to my current apartment. I have had several packages delivered to the wrong apartment (there are three appts in the building) and one delivered next door. Some of these packages were rather expensive items. These were most likely mistakes by seasonal temp workers. Most of the time I would buy locally if I could, but none of these items that I ordered were available locally. Sometimes I can order through WalMart or Target, and pick the items up when they arrive at the store.

  30. Why not used by police? by edi_guy · · Score: 1

    In my city, package theft, bike theft, car break ins are rampant. The police, no surprise, say that the are too busy with working more important crimes. This, though overall crime is way down (use this state chart as a place holder https://www.ppic.org/publicati...) and, again no surprise, the hiring of police officers is way up.

    Why can't the police do a similar thing as this guy? Maybe without the glitter and and fart spray, but perhaps something similar to dye packs used in banks, though less powerful. It should be cheap and easy to GPS track a bait bike, package or take a picture when a bait car is broken into. The problem in my city is that the chance of a thief being caught, and then prosecuted are infinitesimally small. Making some examples of thieves and giving people a second thought as to whether or not their target is a honey pot would put these crimes of opportunity way down.

    1. Re:Why not used by police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do this and then report the 'theft', but the police must obey the entrapment laws.

    2. Re:Why not used by police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why can't the police do a similar thing as this guy?

      Part of the problem isn't the cops, but the courts. A sergeant in the motor vehicle division told me once that the first time you get caught driving a stolen car is automatic probation, no jail time. He told me about another guy caught breaking into cars. When he was processing the guy, he learned he was out on bond, twice for breaking into cars. Yes, he got caught, released on bond (or bail?), got caught again before the first time came to trial, got out on bond again, and was now caught a third time while the first case was still pending. Given that, how motivated would you feel to go after these guys when they get out before you finish the paperwork?

      According to him, it's made worse because of the victimless crimes, there aren't enough jail cells, so the non-violent criminals get little to no jail time. Where's the deterrent?

    3. Re:Why not used by police? by edi_guy · · Score: 1

      Entrapment "is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer. "

      I would love for a defense attorney to try and present entrapment as a defense to any jury in the USA when it comes to package theft. Heck, if you read the comments on slashdot, most people here are ready to offer capital punishment for these kinds of things.

  31. Adolf Hitler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .....invented glitter

  32. I'm honestly sad.. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...that we live in a society where ambushing these pieces of shit is punished. You should be able to beat them with, say, up to a broom-handle.

    I mean, no, I don't think it's justified to go all the way to kill them (although let's be clear: they're the sort of human trash that prevents us from having nice things), but honestly a booby-trap that blinds/maims them would be entirely justified in my book.

    I guarantee you that these sorts of opportunistic thefts would decrease significantly.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:I'm honestly sad.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      You should be able to beat them with, say, up to a broom-handle.

      These people have already been beaten, or they wouldn't have wound up as thieves. Let's find a way to help them before they fall to this level instead of beating them down afterwards.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:I'm honestly sad.. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These people have already been beaten, or they wouldn't have wound up as thieves. Let's find a way to help them before they fall to this level instead of beating them down afterwards.

      Bull fucking shit. A lot of people are just bad regardless of what happened to them (or didn't), their socio-economic status, etc. Some people would rather steal than earn something. Quit pretending that everyone who does this was somehow a victim first -- that's naive nonsense at best. This isn't anywhere remotely like the "stealing bread to feed my starving family" cliche -- it's opportunistic twats cowardly stealing from others who are out working. Anyone who does this absolutely deserves a solid ass kicking, at a minimum.

    3. Re:I'm honestly sad.. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 2

      You should be able to beat them with, say, up to a broom-handle.

      These people have already been beaten, or they wouldn't have wound up as thieves.

      They look pretty well-off to me. Have you even seen the video?

      Let's find a way to help them before they fall to this level instead of beating them down afterwards.

      What level? They're smartly dressed, have $1000 bikes in their houses and drive non-fucked-up cars.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    4. Re:I'm honestly sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I get to own the sweet wheels these turds manage to swing, I'd gladly take that beating. Based on what is seen in the video, the people taking items are bored and avaricious lower to upper middle class, not downtrodden robin-hoods looking to redistribute wealth for 'justice'.

    5. Re:I'm honestly sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up to a broom handle raised my eyebrow, until I reread it and saw the word 'beat'.

      #nocontext

  33. After reading all these comments by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    Where the discussion is moving towards he may cause physical harm. Plus the cost of this package to catch thieves in the act.
    How about something simpler. A device that reacts by motion detection, which screams when picked up. "Help, Help. I am an Amazon Package that is being stolen by someone who is not the owner". Have this in a indefinite loop.

    Would be a heck of a lot cheaper, and less chance of physical harm.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    1. Re:After reading all these comments by MartyBorg · · Score: 1

      My device would start screaming "I am a 30 second bomb,I am a 30 second bomb, 29, 28, 27 ..."

      --
      Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a fish a man, and he'll eat for weeks!
    2. Re:After reading all these comments by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Lol, I also was thinking to getting a voice of some girl screaming 'RAPE, I'M BEING RAPED". Bet that would get the neighbors attention.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    3. Re:After reading all these comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on where you live, the neighbors might come and help...the wrong entity. So I hear. I live in no such place. A pedophile or rapist's lifetime is time to detection + flight time of bullet and cops just clean up after. The country has advantages.

  34. Re:Great job asshat by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Though I wish that there was a practical means of spraying out ground-up crayon wax, something that would embed itself into the fabric and melt into place. Unfortunately it would probably congeal while sitting on the porch.

    I was going to suggest peanut butter powder, but ironically, that could actually hurt someone. Ditto my second choice, onion powder. Nobody is allergic to glucose, but it's a hazard to diabetics...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Revenge isn't Justice. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    I think with the above argument there is the idea the Revenge is Justice.
    If a thief broke into my house and is stealing $1000 worth of goods, I catch him, and hurt/injure/kill him. Then that is normal self defense, because this guy is unlawfully in my house, I an unable to calculate his risk to my immediate safety.
    However after he leave my house with those goods, I cannot hunt him down and hurt/injure/kill him and I would then be guilty of a crime. Because my safety is currently secured, and I would be able to calculate the risks of such actions. And having the criminal arrested and sentenced to court for a Judge to impartially figure out what is Just for the actions.

    So he stole my Laptop, I may want to kill him. However this loss of my laptop is a minor inconvenience to my life, and with calmer minds, would realize that and punish the criminal for the crime and not me gut feeling.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re: Revenge isn't Justice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't really revenge as such, because the harm caused by the package is less than the harm caused by stealing a valuable package. When the harm is less than the original, it's a prank.

  36. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I applaud Mr. Rober, I would think that he has set himself up for a huge lawsuit by whomever took the package.

    Sure, up to a point. But law suits involve juries, and they'll be on his side.

  37. Re:FAAAKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% agreed

  38. Barbie #METOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barbie: No means NO. #metoo

  39. So can you sue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burglar steals a TV and decides to use it at his home. TV bursts into flames and burns his house and he sues the man he stole it from.

    Because that's the same as suing the man you stole the glitter spreading fart spraying fake amazon package from.

    Man rapes a woman and catches STD that sterilizes his baby makers. He then sues the victim because he can't father children.

    1. Re:So can you sue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she knew she had an STD before intercourse, and failed to notify him, he has a slam-dunk case. It is irrelevant that the sex was not consensual. She still has responsibilities under the Law.

      Of course, he is still guilty of rape, but that is a separate issue altogether.

  40. automate sig requirement decision- Re:but why ? by AmusingClown · · Score: 1

    As indicated in the previous replies, it is a highly variable situation. Personally I've not heard of any of our neighbors complaining about theft, and I think over 15 years of one/week porch deliveries, we've experience one missing package.

    As a Vendor I would start implementing a signature requirement if the systems picked up a level of, or an increase in, reported theft in a given area (certainly to the zip code-level, but I assume there is a way to slice that up as well...)
    I wonder if the larger vendors feed this type of information back to the carriers? So carriers could provide recommendations to their entire customer base...

  41. The real issue by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

    The real issue is that no one is doing anything about package theft. I've seen "surprise packages" done before and better and simpler. But none of this goes to tracking down the people who stole the package? Just about "punishing" package thiefs but that's not the way it works. Any basic psychology course could explain that. If one time you went to a vending machine and instead of a kit kat you got a rotten eggs you'd be grossed out and disgusted but the next weeek you'd be at the vending machine again. Ideally these surprise packages might scare them off your house but even that isn't so sure. I'd rather see something more geared to identifying the people involved and getting the police to DO something. Police waste their time doing so much nonsense I'd much rather them spend less money on tanks and whatever excess military gear they buy and more on tracking down package thieves.

    --
    Just another second banana
    1. Re:The real issue by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      By all means - completely enact a thorough and successful plan to fundamentally change the culture of "policing" in the United States. But, what should people do about package thieves for the next thirty years?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  42. Deliver to work by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I actually get most of my Amazon packages delivered to me at work. They get received by people I trust in a warm warehouse and delivered to my desk. I don't have to worry about them being left out in the weather or stolen by neighbors, etc. Plus I have a driveway that the UPS drivers really don't want to bother with in the winter so it's a win for them too. Plus since the driver is already coming to our plant daily it saves a tiny bit of fuel too.

    1. Re:Deliver to work by krray · · Score: 1

      Are you me? Exactly what I do and why. Exactly.

    2. Re:Deliver to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're using your employer's resources for your own personal gain? Did you ever stop to think that those people who are handling your packages for you are doing so at your employer's expense? Do you feel good about cheating your own employer?

  43. You should be able to leave valuables outside by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why the fuck would anyone live in a neighbourhood where you have to lock your door or worry about stuff being stolen in your yard? If you live somewhere that dangerous and read slash dot I'm guessing you can afford to move to a first world nation.

    1. Re:You should be able to leave valuables outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue State Problem

    2. Re:You should be able to leave valuables outside by jbengt · · Score: 2

      Why the fuck would anyone live in a neighbourhood where you have to lock your door or worry about stuff being stolen in your yard?

      Because most people live in populated areas, and in any population there's always a few assholes willing to steal, especially if it's easy and doesn't involve confrontation with the victim or breaking and entering.

    3. Re: You should be able to leave valuables outside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives in Winnetka, a posh expensive city north of Chicago. Southside scum know this and go north to "mine" the packages from those who have more.

  44. Re:Banks do this by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    My guess is that it's a question of enforcement bias. The FBI has jurisdiction over bank thefts and they are unlikely to suddenly reject the longstanding practice of using dye packs. That the FBI has jurisdiction means that local police will never pursue charges against a bank that used a dye pack. Plus the dye packs are probably already rubber stamped by the FBI as "safe".

    In theory, this should make civilian use of dye packs just as justifiable, but because it involves petty larceny instead of the federal felony of bank robbery it's unlikely this will ever happen.

  45. Re:The News we see tomorrow will be by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    One of his "victims" had a multi-thousand dollar bike in his room.

    What makes you think he paid for that bike?

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  46. I think the problem is this guy's an engineer by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    but his copy cats will probably be dumb kids. I've already seen folks doing this with small explosives in order to get a loud "crack" and scare the person. If that keeps up sooner or later some dumb ass is gonna put an M-80 or something in a box and kill somebody.

    And yes, this is why we can't have nice things. People are stupid on both sides of the isle.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I think the problem is this guy's an engineer by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree, copycats will be less nice... if I were a package thief I'd hang it up starting today lest something really nasty happen.

      But, thieves gotta thief I guess.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re: I think the problem is this guy's an engineer by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

      " If that keeps up sooner or later some dumb ass is gonna put an M-80 or something in a box and kill somebody. "

      Live like a criminal, die like one. They won't be missed.

    3. Re: I think the problem is this guy's an engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until someone's well-meaning neighbor sees a package sitting overly long and takes the package, leaving a note, to prevent it being stolen.

      Should they be punished with death?

      This is a problem that's solvable without the need for violence. Not all problems are, but this one is.
      When the problem requires a scalpel, don't use a sledgehammer, unless you'd prefer your doctor to do so as well.

  47. I think the bigger problem is the thing went off by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    in a car. e.g. if it happened when a person was driving and caused in accident.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  48. Because 99% of time time I get my package by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and they usually come when I'm at work. So I'd have to drive down to a pick up point, which would defeat the purpose of ordering online.

    Also, most companies eats lost and stolen packages. I'm well aware this is baked into the price of everything I buy online, but that seems a fair trade off for the convenience.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  49. People "here" aren't assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different parts of the world have different sorts of assholes. In some countries, if you put cash into a greeting card and mail it using the state postal service, the mailman will open it and steal the cash. It is expected. Forget about shipping something like a microwave in that country. It would never, ever, arrive.

    OTOH, 97% of the USA land is rural and people generally respect other people's stuff. If you live in a place where their is a high asshole ratio, that just sucks. You should take extra precautions.

    But over 75% of Americans don't live in places like that. I live near a metro area with 5.5M people. The only lost deliveries we've seen the last 20 yrs were due to incompetent delivery people, not theft. How do I know? We get notified when a delivery is made - I work from home. I'll often walk to the door and see the postal/UPS/FedEx truck up the street still making deliveries. But some times there isn't any truck and the photo of the package on the doorstep posted by Amazon is clearly NOT our house. It doesn't happen very often. Perhaps 3 times the last 20 yrs of deliveries and almost always with LaserShip as the carrier.

    A few of my sisters live in very small towns in the midwest USA. One of them only lock their doors when they leave town. The postman/UPS guy delivers packages to their kitchen table if the weather isn't nice. They've known him 20 yrs. They know his parents and grandparents and his 3 kids. They attend the same church. Granted, that sister lives a very simple life without many gadgets, no real electronics. It is by choice. They don't have much that anyone would want to steal.

    Their are plus sides to living with assholes. More theft, more crime, less freedom, but much more convenience for shopping, airports, travel, arts, etc. I'd rather drive 2 hrs into the city for "art" twice year than live near that many assholes all the time.

    Plus, I like target shooting in my back yard. I bet the city wouldn't like that.

  50. I find the term "Delivery Theft" to be offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These packages have merely been delivered to an Undocumented Recipient.

  51. Because you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Guy = Legend-wait-for-it-ary.

  52. Vigilante Justice is not Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but this guy is nothing more than a petty vigilante, taking the law into his own hands. That's not the country we're supposed to be living in. Imagine if everyone who perceived they were wronged went out and exacted their own version of justice? It would be anarchy and mayhem.

    This guy needs to be made an example of.

  53. Drop box by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    Wall mount package drop boxes are a thing. According to reviews, couriers can be convinced to use them if you put a sticker of their logo on the door. Obviously they only accept packages of limited dimensions, but some of the smallest packages tend to be the most valuable, so it should be quite useful. They're expensive, so there probably won't be a lot of retrofits, but I would expect new development housing to start including such things. There's little reason to believe this delivery-everything trend won't continue, so I would expect them to become bullet points on real estate listings before the end of the next decade.

    That specific model has some design issues, and doesn't seem to have much in the way of direct competition. There are lots of stand alone porch drop boxes, but much fewer in-wall permanent installations. I expect that to improve too, though slowly.

    Unless and until Amazon succeeds with drone delivery. Then all bets are off, and instead of this sort of thing, everybody will want a roof level delivery pad with integrated automated dumbwaiter.

  54. Bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thin but hermetically sealed bag stuffed full of offal. Sitting in the sun all day, with one of those zip-locks with a plastic tab on the bottom. Pull box up, string attached to pulley pulls the zip open, offal goes down and out and everywhere.

  55. Postage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're lucky enough to get a prosecutor with some time on their hands, you could go for trespass, theft, and, if the package was sent USPS, interfering with the mail, which is a federal felony, and possibly a state felony as well.

  56. Re:I think the bigger problem is the thing went of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easily solved by not stealing the package.

  57. I built something similar a few years ago. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    I had the very same problem. First my house was robbed, then the package of security cameras and DVR system was stolen off my porch. I felt like I was being targeted.

    My box was really simple, and was designed for a future deterrent, not a revenge tactic. I spoke to the police station about my idea before I built this and they told me that as long as I don't hurt anybody then the worst I would have to deal with would be a noise complaint.
    .
    I balanced a big bowl of double strong food coloring on brick inside the box, I had cut holes holes in the bottom of the box, and rigged an amazon rape whistles pin to break off and activate right under it, with the loud part epoxied to the box. Package went on my porch on my way out to work. It worked as designed, somebody got the dogshit scared out of em, flung blue food coloring all over themselves and my porch, and the whole street got to hear the whistle. They tell me it went for about 10 minutes before it died or was destroyed somewhere in the field behind our homes. The clown still took the package, but left my porch alone for the rest of the year. I'm certain somebody saw the thief, but nobody wants to be the next target so nobody talked.

    I've been considering doing it again, my packages are disappearing again, and rape whistles are super cheap.

    Vengeance is fun and feels good, but at the end of the day, I just want my packages left alone.

    Drop the stink bomb, use food safe dyes, and make it really loud. According to my local PD, storing these things in a box on my porch is perfectly legal. This costs less than 20 bucks, as long as your amazon rape whistle is not stolen off your porch.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  58. but prob.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can probibly write "WARNING DO NOT STEAL AND DEFINETLY DO NOT OPEN" on the box and you will be in the clear. They will steal it anyway.

  59. Re:I think the bigger problem is the thing went of by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    easily solved by not stealing the package.

    I think the point the poster was making is that the accident could result in death or injury to innocent third parties who were not involved in the theft.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  60. Racists can't even race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A diehard racist would use that as an excuse for more protection for whites. Reinstate the policy but ignore the black neighborhoods. They can't scream racist, and white folks get their ultimately unimportant crimes investigated. Win-win.

    Racists don't even know how to race.

  61. Plus it's not worth killing someone over a package by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    even if they're the only ones that get killed or injured it's not worth it. For the person getting the package it's a minor inconvenience. They report it lost and get it resent. We all pay a bit more in shrinkage, but I doubt it's very much. If these package thieves get too busy the cops take them out eventually.

    Basically, my dinky little $100 order from Amazon isn't worth risking somebody's life for and my $1500, once every 7 years major PC upgrade gets a signature.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  62. Re:Banks do this by DCFusor · · Score: 1

    Banks also got bailed out on our dime. They are special and more powerful than "the law" and don't forget it.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  63. Racists gonna race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds to me you think only black people are thieves. You sure whistled it loudly enough.

    1. Re: Racists gonna race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks are definitely more likely to be thieves.

  64. L2Adjective, n00b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No he didn't, dumbass. Learn how adjectives work. "Deadly" mantraps are illegal. "not deadly" are not illegal. Why is that so fucking hard for you to understand?

  65. Re:Great job asshat by DCFusor · · Score: 1

    You obviously have never been glitter bombed. It's forever. Glitter is the herpes of the crafting world.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  66. Open and shut cases for the taking by fgouget · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if the police did something like this. Given that no one is telling the thieves to steal the packages, I don't think it would qualify as entrapment. So want to boost your police department's investigation success rate? Set up a dozen such packages on the doorstep of volunteers, track the thieves to their lair, arrest everyone who is full of glitter (or got stained through whichever method is appropriate). Open and shut cases. Fewer thieves on the streets.

    I guess you'd need a bunch of different packages types, maybe some real ones in cooperation with Amazon, etc. And once the local thieves have learned not to steal packages on doorsteps, first you've won, and you can send the packages to the police department of the next town over. Borrow them back for a booster shot whenever the local thieves get stupid again.

    1. Re:Open and shut cases for the taking by grahamwest · · Score: 1

      Turns out they have been, at least in New Jersey.

      https://www.theverge.com/2018/...

      --
      Graham
  67. Re:Banks do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. Re:I think the bigger problem is the thing went of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were opening the package while driving it's on them. I don't think a little glitter is going to cause somebody to crash a car.

  69. Blurring faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why blurring the faces of the thieves.
    The fact there is a video proves that they stole it, so there is no doubt and shouldn't be any remorse to out them publicly.

  70. People arguing the thief is the victim by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    Is what's fucking wrong with this country.

    They should be thankful our engineer didn't go all Unabomber on their ass. THAT would have made an AWESOME news story.

    Serial package thief atomized inside car, news at eleven.

  71. Good point by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they should go back to robbing old ladies in the street. Or we could ask ourselves why somebody's bothering to steal packages in the first place. There's plenty of risk, especially given our draconian sentencing laws (three strikes and you're out, you could do 20,30 years for stealing a $10 pair of crap earbuds).

    Man, I swear, America is way, way too into making people suffer.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back corporal punishment. A few public whippings should clear out our prisons. But nobody will come out in favor of that, because it's "cruel."

    2. Re:Good point by sjames · · Score: 1

      The prank packages minus the criminal "justice" system are actually about right. Instant karma, a lesson learned, but no lasting harm to their lives.

  72. Why obscure the faces? by Nkwe · · Score: 1

    In the video the faces of the perpetrators have been blurred out. Why not show and shame the guilty? Put a written warning on the package that says "by opening this box you consent to video recording" or whatever disclaimer deemed necessary.

  73. Trial by Jury! by McLae · · Score: 1

    If I am on a Jury with this case, I would laugh so hard! AND award legal fees to the accused!

  74. Re:I think the bigger problem is the thing went of by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

    Look, I get that all the time "awww! You could've caused an accident with that! What's wrong with you??" and yet to this day the driver has always arrived safely.

  75. Now there's an idea. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    Fit fake packages with every legal known allergy causing substance, and spray that on them; if they die, it wasn't your fault.

    I'd prefer spraying them with Anthrax spores, but the Guys at Ft. Detrick won't answer my phone calls anymore, ever since my buddy died/killed himself. :(

    The army guys wouldn't give me any VX or Sarin, even tho I said it was for "research purposes" on my neighbors cats. And Dogs. And Neighbors...

    Anyone know anyone with Ebola? I'm asking for a friend... :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  76. Likely fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faces of the thieves are masked out which means these videos are fake, made by the inventor himself.

  77. Re:Plus it's not worth killing someone over a pack by sjames · · Score: 1

    The risk is tiny. Hot coffee can be a risk as well, but many thousand people a day drive with hot coffee.

  78. Why does a former NASA engineer live.. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    ...in a such shitty neighborhood?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  79. Why this is fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we are to assume that the statistical likelihood of having a package stolen is roughly uniform, i.e. criminals target random homes with packages out front, then one of three facts are true:

    1) He and his friends and associates have a statistically improbable likelihood of being targeted versus the average

    2) Package theft is so rampant in his neighborhood that even with a presumed uniform likelihood of being targeted, there were still enough samples to provide the 4 or 5 "gotcha'' videos

    3) These 'thefts' were pre-arranged by actors to help make him a Youtube star

    We know that if #2 were true, and package theft were such a rampant problem, the police would care about it and be doing something. But, if we believe his claim that the police don't care, we can scratch #2 off the list.

    We can scratch #1 off the list as being far more improbable than #3, which if we apply Occam's Razor, we can probably presume to be the option that holds the most truth.

    Therefore, this video is a complete and utter fake by a charlatan trying to make money off of Youtube and hocking some fly-by-night VPN service.

  80. Google "Criminals Sue Victims" by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I think the OP has gotten more replies to anything else I've put up with the overwhelming response being "You're an idiot; Rober was justified and no where will the thief be able to sue him".

    Get out your Google machines and look up "Criminals Sue Victims" - they may all not be successful but a lot of criminals do try to sue their victims.

  81. Re: The News we see tomorrow will be by cyberchondriac · · Score: 2

    I see we have a neo-liberal mod out modding everything down as troll here. Don't have to bring race into though as I've seen plenty of webcams where the thieves are white. This one was.
    It's not trolling, it's historically accurate. Most civilian recourse against any kind of home invading criminal is treated as vigilantism and is often viewed more harshly than the original crime, by bleeding hearts judges. You can't booby trap your own property. And there are a lot of messed up people out there who think it's no big deal if this guy gets his packages stolen because he's so well off and "privileged", they see some twisted kind of Robin Hood metaphor in it.
    I guarantee if someone does something like this again, and there is now a high likelihood there will be copycats, they will eventually be charged with a crime of some sort. I'd put money on it.

    --

    Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
  82. Re:Milk bottle box... by scrout · · Score: 0

    Bingo, get an old style milk box for the porch. And a paint sprayer. And a remote controlled car that drove out and launched a bunch of magnetic trackers onto the suspect vehicle. And an autonomous tire shredder, and some other thing that ran under their car and poked a hole in their oil pan. And another thing that knocked them down and probed them up the ass for an hour....

  83. Re:I think the bigger problem is the thing went of by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    The person driving the car should not be opening packages while driving. Wouldn't that be the reason for the accident? So it is still the criminal's fault.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  84. Re: The News we see tomorrow will be by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    No, you don't have to bring race into it, and sure, there are a lot of white criminals out there. This video did, however, make me think of a conversation I had recently which went something like:

    "The fact that African Americans are so heavily overrepresented in police shootings is proof that the whole system is racist!"

    "Well sure, they're overrepresented per capita, but that's because they tend to commit more violent crime per capita as well. What do you want the police to do; ignore black criminals?"

    "They don't commit more crime per capita; they're just targeted by police more so that it looks like they do!"

    At which point I shook my head and walked away. A large number of SJWs think this way, and I could totally see them trying to explain away the huge percentage of black thieves in this video as "targeting" or something equally silly.

  85. Re: The News we see tomorrow will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blacks and whites smoke marijuana at about the same rate per capita.
    Blacks are 300% more likely to go to jail for marijuana possession.

    The fact that there are more blacks in jail for having weed despite whites and blacks having the same use rate shows that there is an imbalance in the system that is prejudiced against blacks. Kind of like how you so clearly are.

    I say this as someone who has never smoked weed and doesn't particularly like blacks.

  86. Re: The News we see tomorrow will be by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Blacks are 300% more likely to go to jail for marijuana possession.

    That's basically nonsense. This particular propaganda talking point is brought to you by people who want you to believe that millions of minorities are going to jail just for having a bit of weed on them. In reality most convictions for marijuana possession happen simultaneously with convictions for other crimes. So when home-boy robs a convinience store, then gets put away for robbery plus having some weed on him, these clowns count him as a poor innocent victim arrested for possession.

  87. Camera with Chime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a camera with a chime -- chime plays when someone approaches, thief looks at where the chime came from, sees the camera, and moves on without committing a crime: https://youtu.be/1QTt6T7BC-k