Slashdot Mirror


White House Advisor Kudlow Says Apple Technology May Have Been 'Picked Off' by China (cnbc.com)

Fred Imbert, writing for CNBC: Larry Kudlow, director of the National Economic Council, said Friday that Apple's technology may have been stolen by the Chinese. "I don't want to surmise too much here, but Apple technology may have been picked off by China and now China is becoming very competitive with Apple. You've got to have rule of law," Kudlow said in an interview with Bloomberg. "There are some indications from China that they're looking at that, but we don't know that yet. There's no enforcement; there's nothing concrete." Kudlow's comments came shortly after China's Commerce Ministry said Chinese and U.S. officials will meet next week to discuss trade. Both countries have been engaged in a trade spat for months that has sent ripples through global markets. John Gruber at DaringFireball comments: I think what he's saying here is that the Chinese stole Apple technology, copied it, and are now flooding the Chinese market with phones based on that stolen tech. I'm 99.8 percent certain that hasn't happened -- if there were Chinese phones built with stolen Apple technology we'd know it because we'd see it.

181 comments

  1. Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple technology!!!

    Ahahaha that's so funny! Now the Chinese can round their corners add notches to screens and remove headphone jacks and extra mouse buttons!

    1. Re:Apple technology by sexconker · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't have the fastest hardware. They leapfrog each other regularly. Their OS and the thermal design of the devices lets them use the hardware much more efficiently than the competitors, however.

    2. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. at the moment yes.
      2. LOL yeah bullshit, Apples facial recognition is garbage. Even at our work 2 brothers I work with can log into each others phones and they are NOT twins. My Bosses Son can login to his phone.
      3. yeah no, FYI for years apple have used 3rd party cloud providers.
      4. and? neither has MS's or many others. DRM generally isn't ever broken, sometimes the procedures around it are broken though.
      5. as above
      6. Apple copies others, they don't have the thinnest or lightest smartphones.not unexpected as for the most part they are integrators not innovators.
      7. Macs only resistance to ransomware is lack of adoption, they have zero protections for it.

    3. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, little of this is really all that important or impressive. Fastest ARM chip? Ok, that's cool! But you know what keeps getting better every year anyway? Chips. This is a fleeting advantage to say the least. Yesterday's best is tomorrow's junk.

      DRM? Worthless, absolutely worthless. It's not like this gives any company an edge over any other. (Plus: for any DRM scheme, if it hasn't been cracked, it's probably only because nobody's bothered to try very hard.) Nobody needs DRM anyway; it's just a way to lower sales.

      Facial recognition? Ok, maybe that's a real advantage. I won't piss on that because it's something I'm unfamiliar with.

      Lighter/thinner? Nothing too special. I don't want to misunderestimate this too much, but that mostly comes down to putting in less stuff. Mostly. What's that going to be, a type of plastic that weighs 2% less?

      Resistant to malware? That's the default. People only think of this as an advantage because so many people are stuck with some unusually bad, below-average OS in some legacy workplace setting. Any highschooler Tom, Dick or Harry that makes an OS can expect it to be about as secure as Apple's (maybe a little more, maybe a little less) unless they do something absolutely stupid. Note: I'm not say Apple sucks here, just that they don't have the Microsoft disadvantage. But almost any OS project can be like that, and exceptions are always a laughingstock. Bragging about an OS' malware-resistance is like bragging about a president being more honest and coherent than Trump. You expect that; it's not brag-worthy.

    4. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than that.

      1: Apple has the fastest ARM CPUs out there.

      That is false. The iPhone can perform better with a lesser CPU because it does not run a Java VM. This was made clear when Nokia released their Meego-powered N9 which was more fluid than the Android flagships of the era which used faster CPUs.

    5. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARM is not Apple ARM is ARM

    6. Re: Apple technology by cypherthor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well.... Chinese companies are flooding the whole world with dirt cheap copies of apple devices. Every single device since 2006 has a Chinese look alike clone... down to the non standard screws on the casing of the 2011 MacBook Air. Itâ(TM)s just like what they are doing to all design companies from gucci to Bose to mevodo. I know some of you think design of devices is something you should be free to copy, but a lot of money spent hiring the best designers and making designs. Apple cant just change their design Willy nilly because the entire product line is consistent. Honestly, the way these Chinese companies are operating is predatory, I think they are making these devices at a loss... probably subsidized by the Chinese government so that apple goes out of business. These products should be banned from sale in US and Europe. If they copied the outside almost exactly, you donâ(TM)t think they copied the insides too? Same logic board design, same component sets... same .... need I go on? Those are you defending these practices and saying its consumer freedom... ask yourselves, what kind of freedom are you going to have when apple, google, sony, even samsung are gone and you have to buy Chinese government subsidized smartphones and computers? You think thinks will be as cheap as they are now? Want a hint... look at any industry that has been decimated by Chinese clones.

    7. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yeah, that makes sense. one of the richest companies in the world is actually being driven out of business because the chinese government is subsidizing knock-offs of their cheaply manufactured toys which obviously must be being produced at a loss, because apple would never rip off its customers with bloated prices

      are you awake

    8. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a load of propaganda! you do knot know what you are talking about.

    9. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1: They were handed 40 years of engineering by ARM and Imagination Technologies.
      2: They didn't invent facial recognition software, and adding poop-emojis doesn't make it an invention.
      3: Remember "The Fappening"? It wasn't some guy who made phonecalls to 200 pretty celebrity girls, it was someone who had unrestricted access to iCloud and could search and view all user data.
      4: Just regular cryptography.
      5: Just regular cryptography.
      6: Apple do not build their own phones, Foxconn do.
      7: That's not an Apple technology, that's just a consequence of Windows being the overwhelmingly largest platform and attracting more users and malware.

      Tough pill to swallow: most of the stuff in the phone was actually invented and designed by other companies around the world. If Apple were building their own phones and components, then you might have had something.

    10. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a citation that the chinese government is subsidizing anything?

    11. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations? We don't need no stinkin' citations!

    12. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A Chinese company has to, by their law, have Chinese government employees and Party members as part of the decision making company board. It would be equal to having a DHS/CIA/NSA employee on every US company's board and who has the deciding authority about everything.

      If you do a venture on Chinese soil, China has to own 51% of the venture, or you go to prison.

      So, where Chinese companies go, so does the Chinese intelligence, Chinese military, and Chinese government.

    13. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi mr american, you can ban them if you want in the US, the rest of the world does not give a fuck. But leave europe alone, we are perfectly fine with our cheap chinese phones, weve been using them for an entire decade already waaaay before you even knew china existed, my first chinese phone has 2.3.7 android and btw still works (imagine that), that version is MAAAANY moons old, bruh

      take your state of the art iphone that ninjas your performance by half after a single year of use "because of the battery getting older and stuff" and shove it where the sung ting wong dont shine

    14. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question should be the other way around. Is there any proof the chineese government allows someone else to operate freely in their country?. Remember they are not a "free" country. Their government style is based on ultra capitalism, one guy controls all. The rest of the government is a rubber stamp of what he wants to do. It is not a free culture, to develop what it wants, but a service culture, to serve one master.
      As to copying apple, where are the factories for apple parts? Same for assembly, no need to copy, could be rejects, resold. And, apple gave the chineese government a copy of their os, no arguements, for the right to do business there. So, why is it strange there are knockoffs there? And cheaper knockoffs there? And probably more secure knockoffs.

    15. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government is one of the most corrupt in the world, I don't think you can send a freedom of information request, they'd probably cut your head off and sell your organs.

    16. Re: Apple technology by reanjr · · Score: 1

      If you think China is ultra capitalist, you should read Hayak to understand what capitalism looks like.

    17. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fappening was phishing, not a hack.

    18. Re:Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't own an iphone never will. However, if you can't see how advanced apple products are you should check your bias.

      Marketing ploys and underlying tech aren't the same.

      (alt headline: hater fanboi facts shits bed when faced with reality)

    19. Re: Apple technology by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      Just walk down any Chinese city... not only are these companies subsidized they practically are the government. The idea of fair competition is non existent. I went to a mall in Shanghai... ten floors high. The building was made by the government. There where three American stores out of about 100 allowed in there. Burger King (god save us), Starbucks and toys r us. Burger King was in the second basement at the very back all the other restaurants where on floors 9 and 10... clearly they did not chose that spot. Starbucks had a fairly good spot, hidden on the third floor, but better than Burger King. Toys R Us had a nice spot with the other toy stores... great right? Until you realize toys r us has been out of business for 5 months and this is just a clone of the whole store. There is your citation... primary source.. me.

    20. Re: Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol that was 10 years ago what are you talking about?

  2. Build something in a country by spiritplumber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and the people in that country will learn how to build it. Big surprise, right?

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
    1. Re: Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah I get it it's another one of those f35 things..go tricking them into thinking the total crap works like last time.

    2. Re:Build something in a country by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny

      I’m assuming that they were referring to software. I don’t think Apple builds any of the manufacturing equipment that they use, so the Chinese manufacturers already know how to produce a lot of that stuff. If the Chinese stole anything having to do with iTunes I truly pity them though.

    3. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a surprise, but what's funny is how many people will totally discount the possibility. Because it's racist or something.

    4. Re: Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chinese people are allowed to crack software. It is not illegal for them crack foreign software. China advances.

      Americans are brutally punished for cracking anything. America falls back.

      It's almost like it's logical or something.

    5. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Rumsfield announcing, Twice, that the Pentagon Lost 2 Trillion Dollars.

      Apparently we've got the collective intelligence of a toddler.

    6. Re:Build something in a country by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being able to build things isn't the issue. That's fine. As is learning to design those things after building enough of them. That's fine too.

      But if they have a contract in place that stipulates that the parts are to be built exclusively for the client and the designs are to remain confidential, there's a problem if they start building the parts for other clients (including themselves) or sharing the designs with anyone else.

      To draw an analogy, it's fine if a contractor knows how to build homes. It's fine if they eventually learn how to design their own homes after building enough of them. But if your general contractor steals your custom home's blueprints and sells them to a developer who builds a neighborhood of copycat houses right next to yours, that's not fine.

      I don't know what's being alleged here, but it seems evident to me that they aren't simply talking about China learning how to manufacture and design stuff on their own.

    7. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to build things isn't the issue. That's fine. As is learning to design those things after building enough of them. That's fine too.

      But if they have a contract in place that stipulates that the parts are to be built exclusively for the client and the designs are to remain confidential, there's a problem if they start building the parts for other clients (including themselves) or sharing the designs with anyone else.

      To draw an analogy, it's fine if a contractor knows how to build homes. It's fine if they eventually learn how to design their own homes after building enough of them. But if your general contractor steals your custom home's blueprints and sells them to a developer who builds a neighborhood of copycat houses right next to yours, that's not fine.

      I don't know what's being alleged here, but it seems evident to me that they aren't simply talking about China learning how to manufacture and design stuff on their own.

      Finally! A voice of REASON!

      Mod Parent UP!!!

    8. Re:Build something in a country by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The whole world will learn how to build it as soon as you release it, because everyone can disassemble it and a lot of the parts of off-the-shelf or explained in patents.

      These days Apple learns as much from China anyway.

      For a start designing any product is as much an exercise in figuring out how to mass produce it as it is engineering the features. And since Foxconn builds Apple products for them they likely learned a lot from Foxconn and took their lead on a lot of the design decisions. Every time a new material or new way of assembling something is introduced, you can bet that it was Foxconn that did a lot of the R&D, quite possibly even originated the idea.

      Of course that's completely normal with US companies too. For example the touch wheel on the iPod was invented by Synaptec, they just couldn't find anyone interested in buying it until Apple came along.

      Modern Chinese smart phones often introduce features before Apple does, and Apple copies them. Wireless charging, for example, became a staple of Chinese high end phones long before Apple adopted it. Dual cameras too, although Korea gets some credit there as well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re: Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't even crack a DVD that you own the rights to watch in this country. Fuck us.

    10. Re: Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, according to the DMCA, you can. Though when it comes to judges YMMV...

    11. Re:Build something in a country by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Is there anything the Chinese could do that you wouldn't condone?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Build something in a country by ewhenn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being able to build things isn't the issue. That's fine. As is learning to design those things after building enough of them. That's fine too.

      But if they have a contract in place that stipulates that the parts are to be built exclusively for the client and the designs are to remain confidential, there's a problem if they start building the parts for other clients (including themselves) or sharing the designs with anyone else.

      To draw an analogy, it's fine if a contractor knows how to build homes. It's fine if they eventually learn how to design their own homes after building enough of them. But if your general contractor steals your custom home's blueprints and sells them to a developer who builds a neighborhood of copycat houses right next to yours, that's not fine.

      I don't know what's being alleged here, but it seems evident to me that they aren't simply talking about China learning how to manufacture and design stuff on their own.

      Yeah, except you left out the part where you know that contractor you just did a deal with has stolen designs from 50 other designers and you still decide to do business with them anyways, and then act surprised when they steal your design too. Gee, who would have guessed that would happen?!?

    13. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apple certainly does not build any of the manufacturing tech. China does. China hasn't stole anything as far as how to turn a brick of aluminum into a sleek phone, they are the ones that posses that technology. Apple makes a design, emails it over to their producer in china and they use their Chinese developed manufacturing techniques to make it. Upload the file to the CNC machine, out comes something that fits within the design limitations of the CNC. At best apple can claim trademark theft by using a similar design.

    14. Re: Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl;dr: the entire "problem" is defense of trademarks and intellectual property, which for some reason slashdot started caring about only after courts upheld their legal right to rip a dvd they own because most folks here are ideologically shallow little consumerist piggies

    15. Re:Build something in a country by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Their human rights record, their massive surveillance state, censorship, inequality, forced relocations... Loads of stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Build something in a country by sit1963nz · · Score: 0

      Sounds a LOT like the USA then.

    17. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US government wishes it could do this.

    18. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But real socialism's never been tried! THIS time it'll be different!"

    19. Re:Build something in a country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try building iphones in africa, lets see if wakanda is real

  3. Of course China stole Apple technology by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    do the China phones have rounded corners? Yeah? Well there you go.

    1. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea and they stole that Android software from Apple ! ;-}

    2. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      While Android was in development before iOS. When Apple released the iPhone, Google had to go back and completely rejigger its OS to meet demand of the Gesture based OS.

      Before the iPhone, Gesture were a Gimmick, and often they were way to hard for people to remember, so they resorted to pressing buttons. Android OS was meant to go against Blackberry with devices with full keyboards and physical pointing devices. Apple when they released the iPhone actually put the smart phone market on a 2 year gap where they had to rethink and rebuild everything.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And today ios is a toxic hellstew of bugs and bad design.

    4. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Before the iPhone, Gesture were a Gimmick

      Except for the millions of Palm Pilot users.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    5. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute... Their phones also have headphone jacks... The jacks were stolen! This is industrial sabotage!

    6. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      And today's and yesterday's (Pick any reasonably complex software) is a hellstew of bugs and bad design.

      As a consumer you need to find the product that sucks less for what you will be doing the most of.
      But when you design software and its scope of use will expand, the more doors are open where you need to either break architecture causing bugs, or try to use the existing architecture in different ways causing a bad design.

      We can all look at a completed product find its problems and come up with a solution that may have made it better, but often such solution would probably put a damper on the other guys change they would want to see.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Of course China stole Apple technology by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I had a laptop with gesture trackpad back in the 90s. Turned them off though, because tapping too near one corner kept opening the start menu.

  4. it's been done since the iPhone first came out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.cultofmac.com/495158/impressive-fake-iphone-clone/

  5. a classic poem is warranted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Me Chinese

    Exploit SOCKS

    Me Put Malware

    On your box

    1. Re:a classic poem is warranted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard the Good News about Host Files?

  6. What technology, exactly? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could he maybe offer some specifics? Exactly what is is that China is being accused of stealing? A claim this lacking in detail is suspiciously non-falsifiable.

    1. Re:What technology, exactly? by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, I guess the iPhone contains close to a hundred thousand different technologies and perhaps the most lucrative is the design/implementation of the A12X SoC.

    2. Re:What technology, exactly? by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Android phones were always years ahead of Apple on technology, at least in the last couple of years. So what exactly new technologies are we talking about?

    3. Re:What technology, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meaning it isn't true. Rule of Law works within boundaries.

      You are psychopaths.
      You are morons.
      You gave it away.
      Now you will start to feel pain.

      Captcha: conduit

    4. Re:What technology, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like asking about a specific drop of water in the ocean. China steals everything. Fuck China.

    5. Re:What technology, exactly? by BringsApples · · Score: 2

      They didn't steal anything, they 'picked off'. What about THAT don't you understand??

      You can pick off your nose.
      You can pick off your friends.
      But you cannot pick off your friend's nose.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    6. Re:What technology, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could stand here and go into details all day, BELIEVE ME. But you know what? You'd be bored. But the truth is, people come to me all the time and say, "Sir, China stole our technology. And now they're selling it cheap, and it's absolutely killing us. Killing us." It's true, this is what they're saying. And we're gonna stop to that. We're gonna stop that. I have a plan... It's a big, strong plan... So big we don't have time for it right now. But we'll be implementing it soon - very soon - and when we do I think a lot of people are going to be very happy with this plan, when they see it. Very happy, believe me.

    7. Re:What technology, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SoC is typically made in Taiwan (or Korea).

    8. Re:What technology, exactly? by gtall · · Score: 1

      C'mon, this is Larry Kudlow. His previous position was talking head on some network. It isn't like he's qualified for anything. Blinky lights confuse him.

    9. Re:What technology, exactly? by ath1901 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, come on, how bad can it be? I know nothing about they guy but I'm sure he has some talents. Let's check Wikipedia:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Wow! That was hilarious! One ridiculous statement after the other. Best summed up by this paragraph:

      In their 2015 book Superforecasting, University of Pennsylvania political scientist Philip E. Tetlock and Dan Gardner refer to Kudlow as a "consistently wrong" pundit, and use Kudlow's long record of failed predictions to clarify common mistakes that poor forecasters make

    10. Re:What technology, exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A rectangle with rounded corners? :-)

  7. The plus side of incompetence by T.E.D. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd be much more worried about a White House advisor spouting nonsense if we had a White House that actually listened to advice.

    With this administration, if the Big T himself didn't say it, its just meaningless noise. And sometimes even if he DID say it.

  8. Hypocritical FUD by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    oh.. yeah, then they don't need to go the more obscure way.

    1. Re:Hypocritical FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no evidence that plan was acted on, and that's a response to China's unrestrained espionage. If China breaks international norms, others follow. Keep crying, snowflake. Putin doesn't love you, neither does Xi.

    2. Re:Hypocritical FUD by hackingbear · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Hypocritical FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "oh.. yeah, then they don't need to go the more obscure way "

      Sure they do. That's why they just landed on the obscured side of the moon.

  9. Who the fuck is John Gruber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... just because they never exported their ripoff phones doesn't mean they didn't do it. There was a long history of exact copying until only the past few years. Chinese brands only now make their own shit. Ask a blind moron for a rebuttal, good job anti-trumpers. Kudlow is an coke head idiot, but he isn't wrong by much.

    1. Re:Who the fuck is John Gruber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows about China's "third shift" where you have a factor produce goods in the day time, but at night, the same stuff gets produced, and sold on the black/counterfeit market, perhaps with a slight logo change. Apple has been good at keeping Chinese ODMs from doing this, but it wouldn't be surprising to see an Android phone come out with all the Apple bells and whistles soon from some no name company. I wouldn't be surprised to see Huawei mysteriously have new Apple-esque features in their next smartphone line either.

    2. Re: Who the fuck is John Gruber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and nothing of value would be lost, a net benefit for all consumers. china should be applauded for leveling the playing field while the us just builds up monopolies

  10. How would you know by dkman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China builds Apple's phones. There was no "theft" necessary. Apple taught them how to build the phones.

    I assume what's in question here is "Is China building iPhones and selling them in China without giving Apple a cut?"

    That's an entirely different question, but quite plausible.

    As for DaringFireball's later comment: How would you know? If they technically are iPhones flooding the Chinese market they wouldn't look like "fake knockoffs" because they technically aren't. But if Apple isn't selling the phones or getting any cut then there's still shady activity going on.

    --
    I refuse to sign
    1. Re:How would you know by jodido · · Score: 4, Informative

      About ten years ago I bought a Prada-labelled shoulder bag in Vietnam for $10 from a street vendor. When I got it back to NY I asked around and it sold for around $400. Not only is it indistinguishable from the real thing, it IS the real thing. It's what I call a "real fake." As described above, the factory gets an order for 5000 of these bags, makes 6000 and sells 1000 out the back door. There is no difference between those 1000 and the other 5000. Did this happen in China with iPhones? Has Apple complained about it? Because they would surely know.

    2. Re:How would you know by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I worked for a company that bought out an other company including all its IP. The owner of the bought out company quit (because he didn't realize when you get bought out, you are no longer in command of such company). Being fed up he used his money he got from the purchase to start his own company. Then he used the software he wrote for the previous company which we now own. We sued him, we won.

      Now if he had written a new program then he would be OK. But the software that we bought the rights too. Thus he went bankrupt, and we got all our money back that was the cost of the company to be purchased.

      Just because you made it, doesn't make it yours. If you sell it, or get paid to build it for someone else, it belongs to them not you, they paid you for it, so it is no longer yours.

      What is yours though, is the experience gained in making it, so you will be on good footing to make something new, possibly better.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:How would you know by magzteel · · Score: 5, Informative

      About ten years ago I bought a Prada-labelled shoulder bag in Vietnam for $10 from a street vendor. When I got it back to NY I asked around and it sold for around $400. Not only is it indistinguishable from the real thing, it IS the real thing. It's what I call a "real fake." As described above, the factory gets an order for 5000 of these bags, makes 6000 and sells 1000 out the back door. There is no difference between those 1000 and the other 5000. Did this happen in China with iPhones? Has Apple complained about it? Because they would surely know.

      I read a book some years ago on the many pitfalls of doing business in China. Issues raised included:

      - Selling unauthorized overproduction runs as you described
      - Making unauthorized changes to the product design or materials to make manufacturing cheaper. There were multiple cases cited where the product changes produced unsafe or defective products that cost the product owners dearly
      - Duplicating the product under another label and competing with the original

      The Chinese government has little incentive to crack down on such practices.

    4. Re:How would you know by klingens · · Score: 1

      Apple would easily know when the phone needs the next update or any other interaction with the Apple servers.
      Phones are no Prada handbags: they need constant service after manufacture. I'm certain almost every chip in every apple device has a unique serial which apple can and does query everytime they phone home for updates, icloud sync, appstore access, etc. There is no way anyone can sell more phones than apple knows. Serials which apple hasn't given out would stand out like a sore thumb, and double serials, 1 serial used for 2 or more devices, would be a little easier to hide but you need to sell thousands to millions of devices to make the fraud profitable, and that many you can't hide with double serial numbers. Kinda hard to hide if the same IPhone is logged in to the appstore once from Hongkong and once from Kuala Lumpur at the same time.

      Phones even have the unique capability of exactly telling the manufacturer where the phone is right now on earth, down to the meter. So Apple "enforcers" can go there and send someone to buy it from the unsuspecting consumer who doesn't know he bought a "fake" IPhone.

      At that point, Foxconn would be bankrupt since apple would sue them into the ground for this. And all the other OEMs who let Foxconn manufacture their hardware would check for the same behaviour and cancel all the contracts as soon as possible. China as a country for outsourcing itself would have massive problems after such a stunt, the chinese government would have to dismantle Foxconn and jail or even sentence the managers to death for this, just to prevent damage from the chinese economy as a whole.

      So IPhones from the actual factory which are not produced under the Apple contract are a total non starter.

    5. Re:How would you know by klingens · · Score: 1

      PS: Samsung or TSMC would need to be "in on it" too since they need to make the additional SoCs. Even more fallout, this time Korea or Taiwan. And they need to use those SoCs or the buyers of the IPhones couldn't use it as an IPhone: no iCloud/Appstore/ITunes access.

    6. Re:How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About ten years ago I bought a Prada-labelled shoulder bag in Vietnam for $10 from a street vendor. When I got it back to NY I asked around and it sold for around $400. Not only is it indistinguishable from the real thing, it IS the real thing. It's what I call a "real fake." As described above, the factory gets an order for 5000 of these bags, makes 6000 and sells 1000 out the back door. There is no difference between those 1000 and the other 5000. Did this happen in China with iPhones? Has Apple complained about it? Because they would surely know.

      I read a book some years ago on the many pitfalls of doing business in China. Issues raised included:

      - Selling unauthorized overproduction runs as you described
      - Making unauthorized changes to the product design or materials to make manufacturing cheaper. There were multiple cases cited where the product changes produced unsafe or defective products that cost the product owners dearly
      - Duplicating the product under another label and competing with the original

      The Chinese government has little incentive to crack down on such practices.

      I think it is actually "All that, and more"...

    7. Re:How would you know by PPH · · Score: 1

      Note to self: Always sell a company with the buggy version of the software. Keep the good stuff for the new venture.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:How would you know by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All those things happen in the west as well. And those responsible go out of business eventually, because they get a bad rep. Then they try to start again with a different name, but eventually people caught on.

      These days if you want high quality, secure manufacturing in China it's available. You might pay a bit more for it. Up to you, go with the cheapest or go with a reputable manufacturer. Do you think Foxconn has 3rd shifts making iPhones?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could he possibly not know that? And after finding out, how could he possibly think he'd get away with doing that? There've got to be more details that at least somewhat explain his behavior.

    10. Re:How would you know by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Chances are Foxconn taught Apple as much about making phones as Apple taught Foxconn. They are hardly new to this game. In fact they have been designing products for western companies to slap their names on for decades.

      As for fake iPhones, there is no need. Go to Shenzhen and wonder around the massive shopping centres that are nothing but people with rework stations refurbing phones, mostly Apple ones. If you want a cheap iPhone X they will sell you one that has had whatever was wrong with it fixed, in mint condition with all the accessories and box.

      Making new ones is risky and would probably be noticed pretty quickly as each phone has a unique serial number that is used for Apple online services. Refurbs are legal and besides which the hot phones in China are from Xaomi and Huawei now, the iPhone is a bit "cheap" because the market is saturated with refurbs and hand-me-downs. Even Apple admitted that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:How would you know by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      - Duplicating the product under another label and competing with the original

      Pfft. Product? Amateurs. China has been caught duplicating entire companies

      Not only that, but they expanded the companies they counterfeited. Did you know NEC made DVD players? NEC didn't know. But apparently they did and they were designed in a subsidiary that they never knew existed.

    12. Re:How would you know by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      They don't happen in the West as the legal and security controls would be in place to stop illegal such events.
      No instant way to legally set up a new factory in the "West" with the same look and feel of the tech for export.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China builds Apple's phones. There was no "theft" necessary. Apple taught them how to build the phones.

      This. Seriously, did anyone expect any different outcome?

      Here is another possible example:

      China: Sure we like you guys, but if your going to enter our market we'd like you to say put up a couple of assembly plants.
      US Execs: We are going to make how much money? Sure, let's do that. (I want my bonus).

      Even if the IP doesn't walk out via actual data, which is likely easier to get to with the China location, the IP walks out with the people working there. There may be other steps required, but eventually you get everything you need or just develop the missing bits.

      US Execs: What do you mean you no longer want to buy from us?
      China: Our products are now comparable to yours and our products are cheaper. What would be the point?

      US Execs: I wonder how that happened? I mean, who could have seen it coming? It's like they had some master plan to get our IP, train their guys, and replace us.

      US Worker: And the circle is complete...

      Related link
      From the link: "Mr. Arkin argued that NBC, and news outlets like it, often miss crucial news stories because they’re so caught up in the “day-to-day whirlwind and hostage status as prisoners of Donald Trump.”

      Basically, I can't stand Trump and thought the quote fit. The fact that Trump, or rather one of his advisors points out the IP theft issue, with an unprovable wild allegation, doesn't change that. A drunken monkey can know fire is bad, but that doesn't mean I want to hire him as a fireman, particularly when this particular monkey seems to think gasoline is a good way to put out fires.

      Disclaimer: I can't stand Trump and I'm quite tired of the hostage situation we have in America with Trump being the hostage taker.

    14. Re:How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a saying in China how to know if your Prada is genuine or not. If it lasts more than 2 years, you have knock off counterfeit.

    15. Re:How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if he had written a new program then he would be OK

      The source code that's compiled into programs is often made of generalized bits and pieces designed for specific tasks that are commonly needed in many programs. If a programmer writes the same code twice independently it's very likely, due to the functional nature of code, that the results will be very similar or even identical. After all, there are only so many ways to open a file, reverse a string, or sort a list and it would be ridiculously unfair to say that once a programmer had sold the source code to a program that he could never use any of those pieces again in another program without being sued by the buyer. This would amount to an unfair restraint of the right to practice one's chosen profession. We in the software profession generally consider the body of knowledge of computer science, programming and software design to be the common heritage of us all. Claiming exclusive ownership of any of these ideas or their implementations would be considered very presumptuous at best. In fact, the person making the claim would probably be laughed at by the community for his ridiculous lack of humility. Every programmer must acknowledge a debt to those who have gone before and to paraphrase Isaac Newton, "If we have seen further it was by standing on the shoulders of giants."

    16. Re:How would you know by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Substitutions for inferior parts definitely happen. One place I worked we ended up buying components ourselves and sending them to the manufacturer, because every time we asked any of the several we used to source some expensive, rare bits they ended up with fakes and nothing worked.

      We even ended up having to specify certain fluxes and solders and reflow ovens because otherwise they would switch to the cheap stuff after a while and quality would go through the floor.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re: How would you know by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I think what Gruber is talking about are things like the processor tech or the Face ID system. We would be seeing more phones with guts more like Apple's and more secure facial recognition. We already know that they're apeing the look and feel of iPhones, and they seem to catch up to the tech (fast fingerprint sensors, dot projectors) on a timeline that suggest they copied the idea but didn't actually lift the manufacturing process.

    18. Re: How would you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every iPhone needs to be activated on apples servers to use it.

    19. Re:How would you know by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well the guy thought he was all that. A super genius Business man and programmer because he wrote an Application in Visual Basic.
      While he was still employed at the company, we knew about his ego, so we all kinda played dumb with him, during the period of knowledge transfer. So his ego, with us playing to it, just so we can get the information much quicker from him, he just thought we were idiots. He thought he could get away with saying he was running with an older version of the software without any ways to prove it. However, he didn't realize how much we were playing dumb. When we saw that the same day he quit, a handful of customers just dropped service, saying they went with another company that could deal with all their data without any interruption. Some of the customers he contacted basically squealed back to us, (Mostly because if they switched they were going to get a lawsuit too). I gave the legal team digital signatures to search for on his server to prove what version of the software was running.

      I think the guy was bipolar, and did all this during a manic episode (within a period of a weekend). He was in general unhappy when he sold the company, that he no longer had control of the big decisions. How we decided to give everyone extra monitors so they don't print boxes of paper every day, then have them scan them back in to the system and then shred the boxes of paper. Also the guy was a bigot, he didn't like that we brought in a manager who happened to be Indian to manage the day to day activities as well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  11. Apple only have themselves to blame by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0

    The innovativeness of Apple's "technology" notwithstanding (I can't see rounded corners and annoying notches being a particularly special USP), if the Chinese stole it, Apple had it coming: they wanted to build cheap, they played with cheap Chinese suppliers, and they've been had. If you stick your head in the mouth of a lion, don't be surprised if you get a headache...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Apple only have themselves to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] Apple had it coming: they wanted to build cheap,[...]

      Exactly which electronics is not built in China? Even Intel has fabs over there to serve the domestic Chinese market.

      * https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/jobs/locations/china/sites.html

      Seriously: singling out Apple is kind of silly given how much of 'everything' is built there.

    2. Re: Apple only have themselves to blame by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      That is because the Chinese government requires US companies to partner with local companies in order to do business in China. Imagine the uproar if Americans required BMW to build cars in factories designed to copy BMW cars and sell them as their own. Yet because of the cheap labor we allow Chinese companies to get away with it. Guess what... itâ(TM)s not as cheap as you think when it will put you out of business in 5 years. Want good cheap labor... go to a country that actually gives a dam about intellectual property. I recently made a trip to Shanghai, I can tell you every American and European product is being sold in huge quantities... great right? Well guess again.. everything is counterfeit.

  12. Which tech? by Valkyre · · Score: 1

    Did they make another BSD fork or are they switching to an x86-based architecture?

    --
    What the heck is a 'sig'?
  13. Why steal from Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just cut out the middle-man and steal from the people Apple stole from.

  14. My cat probably knows more about economics... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ... than Larry Kudlow.

    Apple's problem is that they think everyone on the planet has $1000+ to spend on a phone every couple of years.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:My cat probably knows more about economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples problem is they are not innovating anything or creating new products worth buying.

    2. Re:My cat probably knows more about economics... by fruity_pebbles · · Score: 1

      No probably about it. Your cat definitely knows more about economics than Larry Kudlow.

  15. Re:Larry Kudlow wants rule of law suddenly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until it breaks what he has done to Anthony Bourdain and August Ames

  16. those bastards!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    now the Chinese will have phones without headphone jacks!!!

    -db

  17. It's not Apple's technology by Solandri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple's phones use screens by Samsung or LG, RAM by SK Hynix, flash storage by Toshiba, cellular modem by Qualcomm, battery charger by TI, WiFi/Bluetooth by Murata, cameras by Sony, etc. The only parts Apple makes are the A10 processor and the software. Everything else is stuff made by other companies which anyone can buy to use in their own products. In that sense, aside from the processor and software, cloning an iPhone is relatively simple and does not require any theft of technology.

    Also, the median income in China is 18,371 Yuan, or roughly $2,674 per year. You're kidding yourself if you believe the Chinese would be buying $1000 iPhones if it weren't for the availability of cheap knockoffs.

    1. Re:It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pointing out that the CPU and GPU were mostly made by Imagination and ARM in Britain. Yes, Apple are continously furthering the design, but they received decades of work in their hands to start with.

    2. Re:It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the median income in China is 18,371 Yuan, or roughly $2,674 per year. You're kidding yourself if you believe the Chinese would be buying $1000 iPhones

      An iPhone costs $1000 because people are willing and able to pay $1000 for one.

    3. Re:It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the median income in China is 18,371 Yuan, or roughly $2,674 per year. You're kidding yourself if you believe the Chinese would be buying $1000 iPhones if it weren't for the availability of cheap knockoffs.

      True point, but I think you're comparing apples and oranges here, what does the iPhone cost in China? I doubt they're selling for $1000, aren't prices almost always adjusted for different markets?

    4. Re:It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither are made by either Imagination or ARM.

      They license the instruction set from ARM but it is their own core and microcode. Nothing outside of a set of instructions is from ARM.

      Apple is no longer using Imagination as of this year. They are using their own, home grown GPU solution.

    5. Re:It's not Apple's technology by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      ARM does not make any CPUs. They have the design for them and license it out, for someone else to fab. In fact, Apple does its own silicon.

    6. Re:It's not Apple's technology by klingens · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple is not making anything at all, especially not any chips. They don't have fabs.
      The main chips for i-devices are made by TSMC and Samsung, no one else.
      They are designed by PA Semi an Apple subsidiary or maybe it is incorporated fully into Apple now.
      PA Semi designs custom ARM chips, they don't use the normal cortex A8 A53 or A73 designs from ARM at all. They start with the ARM v8 ISA and from there on, they do everything in their own way. And generally much much better than ARM itself, of course the chips are also quite huge and therefore expensive to manufacture compared to any ARM design. They are however always faster/better than the ARM ones. A current A12 Bionic chip from Apple is about the same size as a current Intel Quadcore CPU, 122mm^2.

    7. Re:It's not Apple's technology by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      If you're familiar with the Chinese income distribution, why are you quoting the median, rather than the percentile and the nominal number of people, who have incomes well north of $30,000 per year, and can afford to purchase an iPhone? Most Americans would be surprised at the raw number compared with the number of US citizens at the same earning level.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:It's not Apple's technology by jittles · · Score: 1

      ARM does not make any CPUs. They have the design for them and license it out, for someone else to fab. In fact, Apple does its own silicon.

      I believe that ARM does have some engineering samples fabbed for development purposes. But nothing that is commercialized by any means.

    9. Re:It's not Apple's technology by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      The only parts Apple makes are the A10 processor and the software

      Maybe, but "the software" is a huge part of a phone. All those people pricing the components of iPhones and then ridiculing people for paying much more for the device are missing this same point. There's a huge amount of R&D and work in the software. Sure, Google gives Android away for free ... but it's really funded by end-user consumption of Google ads. Smartphone OSes cost serious money and end-users have some choice in how they pay for them, though I guess most people don't realise this.

      All this said, I doubt iOS is the tech the Chinese are being accused of ripping off. It would have little value to them unless they were planning on manufacturing their own iOS devices. That would be such a massive and blatant copyright violation that it would really fire up the China-US trade tensions.

    10. Re:It's not Apple's technology by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The only parts Apple makes are the A10 processor

      The A10 is made by TSMC. Apple designed it, but they do not make them.

    11. Re:It's not Apple's technology by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Also, the median income in China is 18,371 Yuan, or roughly $2,674 per year. You're kidding yourself if you believe the Chinese would be buying $1000 iPhones if it weren't for the availability of cheap knockoffs.

      The median income in a country of 1bn people many of which are 3rd world is not very interesting. Based on telecom activation figures there are only 100million activated iPhones in China, not all of them current, not all of them top of the line. They are very much toys for the rich.

      That said there's a lot to choose from in the iPhone lookalike category, but this all has zero to do with "stealing technology" as much as it is buying the same screen and camera module and throwing it in a case and slapping Android on it:
      http://www.oukitel.com/product...
      https://www.goophoneshops.com/...
      http://www.blackview.hk/blackv...

    12. Re:It's not Apple's technology by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its the generational changes that China wanted.
      The sealed battery design. CPU, GPU, storage use. Battery time. The ability to make a new production line work with less workers, robots
      Thats the US design skill that set advanced and new US designs apart from the existing generations of smartphones and flip phones.
      Thats all US tech that gets transferred out when seeking low cost nations.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re: It's not Apple's technology by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      Apple bought Freescale many years ago... engineers and all. Apple soc are based on Freescale technology.

    14. Re: It's not Apple's technology by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      Well having been to China... it may be that most people make almost no money.... but there is a huge middle class probably bigger than in most European countries with tons of disposable income. 1000 for the is nothing. There is an entire block of mclaren shops in Shanghai including mini mclaren for the kids. You think those are cheap?

    15. Re:It's not Apple's technology by dk20 · · Score: 2

      Most americans want to pretend China is an economic wasteland, and they are years ahead of them.. They prefer this comfortable feeling instead of reality.

      "
      Who Has the World's No. 1 Economy? Not the U.S.
      By most measures, China has passed the U.S. and is pulling away.
      "

      https://www.bloomberg.com/opin...

    16. Re: It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple bought Freescale many years ago... engineers and all. Apple soc are based on Freescale technology.

      No, NXP bought Freescale.

    17. Re:It's not Apple's technology by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Huawei also designs their own chips like the Kirin processor line.

    18. Re: It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But clock for clock, the performance of the Kirin is garbage next to an Apple soc.

    19. Re: It's not Apple's technology by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      My bad... https://patentlyo.com/patent/2... They just acquired all their IP...

    20. Re:It's not Apple's technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A12 says: "The die size of the A12 is 83.27 mm^2" which is only 2/3 the size of an Intel CPU.

    21. Re: It's not Apple's technology by jittles · · Score: 1

      Apple bought Freescale many years ago... engineers and all. Apple soc are based on Freescale technology.

      I am aware of that. I was just pointing out that I believe that ARM does manufacture some CPUs, at least in the same sense the AMD manufactures them.

  18. The situation is really grave. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Apple developed the technology to get mediocre products made cheaply in China to be marketed as a premium product. Pollution stayed in China. Profits stayed in US of A.

    If China figures out how to make people pay premium prices for its crappy products we are doomed!

    It is time we replace Sam Walton as the ultimate traitor of the USA, Benedict Arnold is nothing compared to this rat. Exported the manufacturing technology, taught them how to make products that could be sold in USA. Single handedly changed the playing field and made every retailer to go to China. Decimated the manufacturing base of the USA.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:The situation is really grave. by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Old Sam didn't do what you think he did. When he ran the company it prioritized american made products.

      When Sam handed the company to his kids is when the made in china takeover happened. His kids had been raised with a silverspoon in their mouths and had no concept of american patriotism. Much like the current president.

    2. Re:The situation is really grave. by dk20 · · Score: 1

      Profits stayed in US of A.

      that isnt accurate either.. The profits stay overseas so Apple can avoid paying US taxes, while maximizing US benefits they receive (patents, etc).

  19. Trade secrets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What trade secrets does apple have? Aren't most of Apple's tech patented? Meaning there is a complete description of them at the patent office for everyone to examine.

  20. Apple doesn't have "technology". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple largely takes off the shelf components, and designs phones/computers using them. The only "technology" they develop is software, which is pretty hard to steal and not make it obvious.

  21. What "Apple technology" exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple doesn't make much other than the software. The GPU and CPU were mostly made by Imagination Tech and ARM, to name a couple of things. And most of the parts are already manufactured in China by Chinese companies. Does this clueless person even know that Android phones are just as advanced, and are almost exclusively built in China as well?

    Statements like these are what you get when stupid people talk about things they have no clue about.

  22. The real question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who did apple steal it from?

  23. Kudlow's a Shyster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Another idiotic comment from an corporate, know-nothing shill. Some excellent quotes from Kudlow just to show how out of touch he has been with economic reality:

    “Despite all the doom and gloom from the economic pessimistas, the resilient U.S. economy continues moving ahead,” Kudlow wrote on Dec. 7, 2007, in National Review.

    “There’s no recession coming. The pessimistas were wrong. It’s not going to happen,” wrote Kudlow. “ ... The Bush boom is alive and well. It’s finishing up its sixth consecutive year with more to come. Yes, it’s still the greatest story never told.”

    Even as trouble became clear, Kudlow, a CNBC pundit who is not trained in economics, wrote a Feb. 5, 2008, column in National Review saying he was “still betting on and buying Goldilocks [a just-right scenario] for the long run.” He wrote, “Maybe we are going to have a mild correction. Maybe not,” adding: “I’m going to bet that the economy will be rebounding sometime this summer, if not sooner. We are in a slow patch. That’s all. It’s nothing to get up in arms about.”

    When the economy didn’t rebound and housing continued its collapse, Kudlow pronounced, in a CNBC column on July 24, 2008, that he saw in the data “an awful lot of very good new news, which appear to be pointing to a bottom in the housing problem; in fact, maybe the tiniest beginnings of a recovery.” Stocks lost nearly half their value in the coming months.

    All take from, and more here:
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/larry-kudlow-may-have-been-more-wrong-about-the-economy-than-anyone-alive/2018/03/14/a98f2292-27ce-11e8-b79d-f3d931db7f68_story.html?utm_term=.e99498c1990d

    1. Re:Kudlow's a Shyster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and more:
      https://dealbreaker.com/2018/12/larry-kudlow-being-totally-wrong-all-the-time-is-the-only-safe-market-indicator-we-have-left/

    2. Re: Kudlow's a Shyster by cypherthor · · Score: 1

      This guy is a total idiot... but he is stating the ovious

  24. The greedy corporations gave it all to the China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We've been outsourcing US work to China.
    This means the greedy US corporations built factories in China, exploited the cheap labor and showed China how to
    make product X, Y and Z. Now the greedy US corporations are surprised that China knows our technology.
    This concept is best explained by Jib Jab's Big Boxmart video.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKv6RcXa2UI

    In essence, US corporate greed created their own competitor.

  25. No, China has not! by DaMattster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am not an apologist for China but neither am I for Apple. Apple simply hit peak iPhone and had no ideas to really innovate further. Let's put the blame where it really lies, with Apple. The last 3 years the changes were basically a better screen and a better camera and hardly worth spending that kind of money for so little in return. In fact, we've really hit peak smartphone altogether. Whatever changes we will see forthcoming are hardly worth the additional price. In fact, I stopped chasing the smartphone craze three years ago. Now I only get free phones offered by prepaid carriers. I usually float between 3 different ones depending on which company has the best deal. I would rather spend the money on a real digital camera.

    1. Re:No, China has not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe if Apple's development environment didn't suck so bad people could make some innovative apps for it specifically, but Xcode is shit, Swift has trivial but breaking changes every single year, and Apple's down documentation is littered with old objective-c code and warnings like "this document is no longer updated go here for a newer version" which just points to a list of methods and absolutely nothing else. It sucks so fucking much. Apple is clearly horrible at software.

    2. Re:No, China has not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they can remove some ports.

    3. Re:No, China has not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is clearly horrible at software.

      It's ironic then that Microsoft provides some of the best coding tools and support anywhere at no charge and for the most part programs that you compiled a decade ago still run on the latest versions of Windows. Say what you want about Microsoft's faults, but excellent programming tools and backwards compatibility were definitely their strong points.

  26. Leapfrog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the USA is so preoccupied with guarding what they've already got with patents and copyright, and diverting funds away from fundamental research, which is the starting point for tech innovation, China is learning everything they can from existing tech and investing in research so that they can leapfrog the USA. Patents and copyright don't mean shit in this game. If the USA doesn't change strategies and focus on competing in innovation (not Apple's idea of "innovation" either), they'll lose, big time. Remember how Japan and Korea decimated US car industry?

  27. another rumor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hear someone picked there nose

  28. I think we are making the wrong assumptions here by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    I don't think this is about the iPhone. From the https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    From all the comments here, everyone has been assuming this is about the iPhone or other mobile products. But Apple has it's fingers into other areas too.

    So, is it really far fetched that the statement is false? Especially seance their already has been arrests.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  29. Re:I think we are making the wrong assumptions her by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    He was an engineer for self driving cars, that was the link reference. What I meant to say was, is it really farfetched what was reported is true?

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  30. Why does the govt care anyways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought people wanted small govt? So why does the govt care? Oh, plutocracy is why; I get it.

  31. wrf are they expecting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you produce everything in China... ofcource they will have the tech to make it and even improve or make similar products..

  32. Cold War feelings... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    ... all over again!

  33. pgmrdlm is a fucking moron lol, wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you retarded or just illiterate? Wow you are truly stupid lol.

  34. Apple Technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple invented nothing other than the look and feel and the OS. Everything hardware wise is consumer off the shelf parts. Yes even their CPU. It is off the shelf ARM design.

    As far as OS i know of no Chinese phones running iOS. They're all android, maybe a UI skin to make it sorta look like iOS.

  35. rule of greed by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    No, it's the rule of greed that says send your work to countries with cheap labour and maximise profits.
    Japan did the same thing years ago, they learned fast how to do it better than the fucking Yanks.
    Now China is doing it on a vastly different scale.
    They are going to fuck us over so bad we'll have a new appreciation of what our arses are for.
    Now just bend over and take it like a man.

    --
    Go well
  36. And they can throw a LOT of engineers at it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    if you produce everything in China... of cource they will have the tech to make it and even improve or make similar products.

    And they can throw a literal army of engineers at it: Reverse-engineering anything you didn't tell them about your stuff, then fixing bugs, adding bells and whistles, and eventually pushing out the core functionality to advance the bleeding edge.

    Individually they may not average as good as US engineers (though many of them are quite competent). But suppose they're only a third as effective. If they can throw ten to a hundred times as many at a product (and organize them effectively) they can still beat you at pushing your own stolen tech out beyond the cutting edge - and beyond your own next-few-gens progucts.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:And they can throw a LOT of engineers at it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they can throw ten to a hundred times as many at a product (and organize them effectively)

      That last part is the key. China's people generally lack the freedom to call their boss an asshole and walk out. Since the "rockstar/asshole" engineer who can actually build the new thing can't fight the PHB politically appointed boss, he won't get the traction needed to be recognized as a super star and so the mediocrity ceiling keeps existing. This is why even the best of China's students, who come here, tend to cheat/share at a higher rate than he better domestics.

      Xi has nearly as much internal conflict as the US does, but China doesn't have an outlet for it - that's why they need to keep building abroad and being export driven. The instant China's exports drop, their people will lose jobs, starve and riot.

      For some things, stuff that is well understood already, China will naturally be a powerhouse as they have a billion bodies to throw at it. But for, innovative, or "clever" things, not so much. Africans invented fire and maybe farming, Europeans came up with catapults and the moveable type printing press, the UK invented the steam engine. The US invented the electric engine, phone, sound and video recording, cars, computer, video games, internet, gps... Japan got in a few improvements in the auto, video game and blu ray laser, but what does China have as a domestic product? Porcelain? A minor improvement to pottery, itself invented thousands of years prior? Maybe Fireworks? A bigger version of a wall? Fuckers still don't have an alphabet that doesn't require 2,000 symbols to read a decent newspaper.

      China has an impressive industrial manufacturing base, thanks to export driven demand and a totalitarian government that gave zero shits about poisoning the local environment for most of the last hundred years, and few shits now. But in the past 2500 years, they have never really come up with something new that has changed the world. Some good food though.

      Hopefully we can come together with solar panels that are 3d printed from shit and all have enough energy to not have to fight over resources, but until then... We need a culture to invent the stuff that will lead to that level of bounty.

  37. Microsoft says... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    We keep putting the WinPhone tech on amazon.cn and others, but nobody ever downloads it.

  38. Kudlow Is A Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when Kudlow attacked Canadian PM Trudeau, for holding a news conference after a meeting with President Dump?

    Hey Kudlow, it's the Prime Minister's job to talk to Canadians. It may be your job to bootlick your President, but you can F- right off when it comes to the Canadian PM talking to Canadians.

  39. Re:Larry Kudlow wants rule of law suddenly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what about Bill's Arkansas drug running landing strip(s)?

  40. You've got to have rule of law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Apple, good luck using "LAW" to recover your IP thefts!

  41. Re:I think we are making the wrong assumptions her by gtall · · Score: 1

    From Larry Kudlow we can fairly assume the statement is false. He's on par with economics in the same way a brick is on par with the Sargasso Sea (to rework a Douglas Adams' metaphor).

  42. We should outsource everything to China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And not expect them to actually look at what we have them make for us.
    Profit!

  43. How this could have been avoided by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Set up secure factory networks in say the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Ireland.
    Make a deal with the governments for union free, low tax, low cost workers.
    Such pro West nations would have kept all US secrets and produced great export products for generations.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  44. No point in trying to make China agree to rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when Israel will just sell/give them any tech you develop.

  45. Re:I think we are making the wrong assumptions her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never know, he can't be wrong 100% percent of the time, can he? Sooner or later he's going to screw up.

  46. when it comes to china.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tech WAS stolen, never is it ever 'may have been'.

    the prc (aka 'mainland china'), its government, and its companies, DO NOT honor or respect the intellectual property of others, nor patents, nor copyrights..nor have they ever.
     
    .
     
    /endthread

  47. At least... by Texmaize · · Score: 1

    Sure, but at least Apple saved money in the long term with cheap labor....

    Hahahahha

    --
    "Liberalism is a very noble idea, currently controlled by some very bad people. Be sure you do not get the two confused.
  48. Trolling Bear problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, you either don't read or can't. That says they sued to find out what info was being shared, is not any evidence at all that US intel agencies ACTED on the info or gave it to US corporations to use as you alleged, liar-bot.

    1. Re:Trolling Bear problems. by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Maybe you are the one having reading difficulty. The first sentence said:

      German media reports suggest the country's spy agency BND collected data on European firms at the behest of the US National Security Agency.

      And in NYT link of the Intercept report:

      In each of these cases, American officials insist, when speaking off the record, that the United States was never acting on behalf of specific American companies. But the government does not deny it routinely spies to advance American economic advantage, which is part of its broad definition of how it protects American national security. In short, the officials say, while the N.S.A. cannot spy on Airbus and give the results to Boeing, it is free to spy on European or Asian trade negotiators and use the results to help American trade officials — and, by extension, the American industries and workers they are trying to bolster.

      So the differences are
      1. some Chinese companies may spy on American companies; some of them may be state-owned. All of above are according to some US agencies who also told us that Iraq had WMDs. (Also note: "state-owned" in China is no more relevant than the US Treasure holding huge amount of shares in GM.)
      2. whereas the US agencies are spying on Chinese and European business as a government operation for advancing US economic advantages. And that's shown by leaked documents and sources.

  49. Making Up a Story to Deflect from the Trade War by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    In addition to it being peak Apple there is a backlash against things American since Trump decided to start his winnable trade war with China. The iPhone is no longer the status symbol it was six months ago. The Chinese brands, which typically use Android, are seeing a huge surge of interest, especially Huawei.

    It wasn't that long ago that the US Government came out with the "report" that Huawei's telecom gear had backdoors in it but they couldn't say what it was. So far Germany has only come out and called their bluff. The other day Apple comes out with a warning about China and Trump's Trade War impacting their upcoming results. So now the White House comes out with a vague statement about China stealing Apple's technology. This is all a smokescreen to get you to forget about the damage that the trade war is causing but there's going to be a bunch of other companies with disappointing financial reports soon because Trump doesn't know the first thing about economics.

  50. Re:Prada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know who else might have ripped off a some Prada stuff?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LG_Prada

    What does that remind you of?

  51. Apple logo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is nothing more than a pissant silhouette of an apple with a bite taken out of it.

  52. Tim Cook appears to be a bungling idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By manufactruing in China, Steve Jobs bought his investors a far higher profit margin, but for a limited number of years. By manufacturing in China, he had to teach the Chinese to build his products and provide all the necessary documentation and understanding - and then by paying them to do that manufacturing he had to pay them enough to capitalize the infrastructure. This started a countdown clock for how long it would be before the Chinese state-run faux-businesses would be able to compete with and eventually overtake Apple with this product category - eventually Apple becomes the eliminateable expense in the cell phone market.

    Steve Jobs effectively set Tim Cook up with a fixed number of years and an outrageous giant pile of cash - to dream-up and design and perfect Apple's "next great thing". So far, however, Cook seems to have made minor tweeks to the iPhone, and driven its price up to focus on the high-end customer, but there seems little evidence that he has been inventing a new "something insanely great". Perhaps he out to have spent a little more time on CEO matters and a little less time pushing his personal sexual-political preferences.

  53. So many lies, are you WindBourne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's not only WindBourne that is this clueless? Who's that other idiot again?

  54. More expensive in China, not less. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phones are more expensive in China because of taxes. Thats why people go abroad and come back with half a dozen phones to resell.

  55. Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a joke! Pure hysteria and fake accusations.

    Why would China stole Apple technology? Huawei (and Samsung by the way) hardware are way better than Apple's. The only thing keeping Apple afloat is iOS, and that has not worked in China. Chinese people are used to Wechat and all-inclusive apps which work as "operating systems" on top of the operating system. Apple limits the functionality of apps to try to prevent this, but not Android variants do not.

    Another lie from the uncompetitive team.

  56. Theft is the sincerest form of flattery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Apple doesn't take flattery very well or at all!

  57. Apple bought their tech by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    that's the joke. the guy is so out of it and doesn't understand what goes into a mobile phone.

    "Apple tech", well, you could at least specify what technology is there that's unique to Apple then. How do you steal something you're selling and licensing? like an arm soc - arm holdings licenses it, chinese pay for license and put it on a cheapo chip they put on a phone - where in that scenario is there anything stolen off apple?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  58. China is cheap. You just don't know how cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they're not made at a loss. The price of the Chinese goods gives you an idea of the profit margin elsewhere.

    10 years ago a factory printed DVD in a cover could be bought on the streets of Beijing for about USD$2 at the same time they were being sold at WalMart for USD$20 or more. The $18 difference isn't transport costs.

    1. Re:China is cheap. You just don't know how cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 years ago a factory printed DVD in a cover could be bought on the streets of Beijing for about USD$2 at the same time they were being sold at WalMart for USD$20 or more. The $18 difference isn't transport costs.

      Yeah, some of that $20 actually went to the people who made the stuff that's on the disk.

  59. It's almost like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost like if you pay your enemies to build your stuff for you, they'll steal your secrets and start building it for themselves. Smart!

  60. "May, could, we don't know but" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Articles are not considered NEWSWORTHY. They are downright FAKE NEWS.

  61. Trade War? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except the iPhone's are Chinese phone and have been except from tarrifs.

    Maybe you simply cannot sell phones 4 to 10 times the price with less innovative products.