Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia CEO Trashes AMD's New GPU: 'The Performance Is Lousy' (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Yesterday, AMD announced a new graphics card, the $700 Radeon VII, based on its second-generation Vega architecture. The GPU is the first one available to consumers based on the 7nm process. Smaller processes tend to be faster and more energy efficient, which means it could theoretically be faster than GPUs with larger processes, like the first generation Vega GPU (14nm) or Nvidia's RTX 20-series (12nm). I say "could," because so far Nvidia's RTX 20-series has been speedy in our benchmarks. From the $1,000+ 2080 Ti down to $350 2060 announced Sunday, support ray tracing. This complex technology allows you to trace a point of light from a source to a surface in a digital environment. What it means in practice is video games with hyperrealistic reflections and shadows.

It's impressive technology, and Nvidia has touted it as the primary reason to upgrade from previous generation GPUs. AMD's GPUs, notably, do not support it. And at a round table Gizmodo attended with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang he jokingly dismissed AMD's Tuesday announcement, claiming the announcement itself was "underwhelming" and that his company's 2080 would "crush" the Radeon VII in benchmarks. "The performance is lousy," he said of the rival product. When asked to comment about these slights, AMD CEO Lisa Su told a collection of reporters, "I would probably suggest he hasn't seen it." When pressed about his comments, especially his touting of ray tracing she said, "I'm not gonna get into it tit for tat that's just not my style."

11 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Article? by Joviex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or is hearsay and copy-paste shit from the internet count as an article link now?

    I knew /. was getting bad, this is a hot garbage example of that.

    1. Re:Article? by tsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not what it used to be when Commander Taco was still in place. Back then the tech world was more exciting, with new technologies constantly emerging, and MS the evil villain of the computer scene whom everybody loved to hate. Facebook is an amateur compared to the shenanigans MS pulled back then, and came away with. The articles just were more interesting back then. The /. crowd has changed too. Back then we had really intelligent discussions by smart people in the comments. Nowadays I sometimes think I got lost on a Trump loving, climate chenge denying site paid by the fossil fuel industry. Or there's just a bunch of selfrighteous wankers telling each other how stupid they are. No fun.

      I'm much more on Ars than /. now because Ars has the better articles, more interesting comments and /. often is just a copy of the Ars website with a different layout an less in-depth conversations.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Article? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 3

      I don't know man; facebook seems to be an evil of several orders of magnitude worse than MS. MS wanted to control the desktop market - through any means necessary -- but they mostly stopped there. They didn't really get into the pervasive surveillance that modern web companies are involved with.

      Basically FB wants to monetize and track every single living person on this planet. That's way worse than anything MS ever did in their heyday.

  2. TFS? by e432776 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This summary makes little sense.

    1. Re:TFS? by Zizzybaluba · · Score: 2

      There was supposed to be a reference to ray-tracing, but it was lost. Ray tracing is "the primary reason to upgrade from previous generation GPUs"

  3. Waiting for 4K / 60 FPS under $500 by bit+trollent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not planning on upgrading my video card until I can get 4K video running at 60 FPS for new games. Neither nVidia nor AMD can pull that off, with nVidia coming the closes in its video cards priced above $1000.

    Maybe the next video card generation...

    1. Re:Waiting for 4K / 60 FPS under $500 by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

      This might never happen because over time games studios start utilizing heavier shaders, better particle system, real time ray tracing/global illumination, better world destructibility, etc. etc. etc.

      Also, you could probably buy a second hand 1080Ti for $500 if you look hard enough and this GPU is sufficient for 4K@60fps in most games.

  4. Also cost half as much as the nvidia "flag ship". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Their 700USD product is SHIT compared to our twice as expensive product!" - nVidia PR dude.

  5. Nvidia CEO Trash Talks AMD's New GPU by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ask a CEO of a public company about a corporate competitor and they are going to trash talk them without any substance.

    Even TFA opens with this admission:

    Yesterday I spent two hours listening to the CEOs of rival companies talk trash about each other.

    And they ask for details about his trash talk it all fizzled out.

    When pressed about his comments, especially his touting of ray tracing she said, “I’m not gonna get into it tit for tat that’s just not my style.”

    This is the kind of crap you would read in a Hollywood gossip rag with a twist.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Nvidia CEO Trash Talks AMD's New GPU by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      The twist is, it's a Hollywood gossip rag for geeks!

      At least this particular story is not characteristic of a political gossip rag. Slashdot has become just a forum for idiots yelling at each other, but idiots yelling at each other about video cards is at least something you can't normally find on mainstream media websites.

  6. Forget Intel/AMD/NVIDIA by DMJC · · Score: 2

    When can I get a P1 166Mhz on a laptop motherboard with a Voodoo 2, Realtek 8129 LAN port and Soundblaster 16 Audio. That's all I want. Give me a nice 13" DOS/Win98SE gaming laptop for under $500 AUD.