Slashdot Mirror
Amazon To NYC After Reconsidering HQ2 Plans: It'd Be a Shame If Something Happened To Your Kids' CS Education
theodp writes: Commenting on reports that Amazon is reconsidering its plan to bring 25,000 jobs to a new campus in New York City following a wave of political and community opposition, Amazon issued the following statement: "We're focused on engaging with our new neighbors -- small business owners, educators, and community leaders. Whether it's building a pipeline of local jobs through workforce training or funding computer science classes for thousands of New York City students, we are working hard to demonstrate what kind of neighbor we will be." Yep, it'd be a shame if something happened. The Washington Post earlier reported that New York State Sen. Michael Gianaris, a strong opponent of the Amazon HQ2 deal, described the possibility that Amazon would pull out of the deal -- which totals up to $3 billion in state and city incentives -- as akin to blackmail. "Amazon has extorted New York from the start, and this seems to be their next effort to do just that," he said. "If their view is, 'We won't come unless we get three billion of your dollars,' then they shouldn't come." Over at Vice, Ankita Rao examines what Amazon infiltrating America's school system might look like.
I'm not exactly a fan of Amazon, but it's rational for them to dedicate resources to the communities where they will have a significant presence. If they don't go to New York, and go somewhere else instead, then resources they were going to spend on the community in New York will instead go somewhere else.
It's critical that resist efforts of companies like Microsoft, Facebook, and Amazon who want to exploit public education for profit. Amazon doesn't want to help students, they want to make money and getting their hooks into lucrative contracts with schools is a core part of that.
We've already seen Bill Gates make repeated attempts to ruin education for profit, Zuckerberg is attempting to enter that market, and now Bezos wants to do the same.
Education only works if teachers can teach instead of being bound to reciting material designed by non-educators working for billion-dollar companies that are designed to encourage dependency on their services and work advertising into lessons. Kids don't need that, and we must reject it.
It would be *impossible* to prepare the kiddies for a future career in STEM without corporate support and branding.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Kids don't need Amazon to learn computer science. Just like my dad got a Timex Sinclair to teach me, if a parent these days want their kids to learn then they can get a raspberry pi.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Even though $3 billion sounds like a lot of money, it's not necessarily a terrible deal for the state. Assuming that you bring in 25,000 new jobs and you're not displacing anyone else as a result (which I'll admit is a bit of a stretch) and that the average salary of each employee is $100,000 (seems ballpark good based on a quick Google search and information on glassdoor), then that's nearly $3 billion that Amazon is paying back into the area in the first year. State taxes for those employees will be 6.65%, so the state would make back that money in a little under 20 years. Once you factor in sales tax and additional taxes gained from the additional money being spent into the local economy and the turn around might be much shorter.
That aside, I still don't think it's appropriate for governments to cut special deals. If you're going to have various tax laws, etc. then all companies and citizens should play be the same rules. To do otherwise is simply forcing other businesses to subsidize Amazon. If New York has policies that make in unattractive for Amazon to locate there, then Amazon should go somewhere with better policies. Anything else tends to send the wrong messages and encourage the wrong sort of behavior. Make it illegal for government to sell and companies to buy preferential treatment and we'll be much better off if for no other reason that it keeps the kind of pimps out of office that thrive on whoring out political power.
on par with a sports stadium but without the benefit of getting to riot if you win/lose a championship. It's going to cost more in infrastructure and direct subsidies then those 25,000 jobs will every pay out (and that assumes they really bring 25k jobs).
Let 'em go. Jeff Bezos has enough of my tax money already.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Why is amazon not providing education and other incentives for some random hole in Kansas! Damn you corporate entity!
Sensational headline is sensational. News at 11!
if a parent these days want their kids to learn then they can get a raspberry pi.
I suppose buying them a hammer will teach them architecture.
were only for 240 "underprivileged" high schools, which is a drop in the NYC public school system bucket.
The additional income from additional city taxes gained from the new employees is a much bigger bucket.
I'm going to need to see a source for that. K, thx.
Well I would say something to draw with, not a hammer. But if they truly want to learn it than yes.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Not like they would even get hired by Amazon anyway. They prefer h-1b visas where the workers can't leave for better pay and working conditions.
Their only goal here is to flood the market with as many programmers as possible to lower their salaries. You'd think once you had more money than you could ever spend, it would be enough, but apparently not.
also it's normal for big corporations to seek incentives from state
It's normal. That doesn't mean it's good.
, in the long run the state and population gets many times the return
No, in general not. The "long run" result is that once one company discovers that they can avoid taxes by pitting one locality against another in a bidding war, then all companies start to do that, and essentially what happens is that municipalities stop getting revenue from taxes. So they have to tax their residents instead.
Everybody loses.
Hmm, will the CS curriculum say AWS is the *only* Cloud that matters?
I think it's time that government in general consolidate and bulk up its capabilities to match the power of corporations (and by the way, also stop allowing people to derail it with ridiculous symbolic / meaningless debates on tiny unimportant issues).
Whether this takes some restructuring of government at the state + federal levels and maybe some amendments to lower our expectation of individual rights compared to overall societal good, whatever. Government is being outmatched by the power of corporations, and it will lose. We should fix it before it becomes unsolvable.
"Amazon has extorted New York from the start, and this seems to be their next effort to do just that," he said. "If their view is, 'We won't come unless we get three billion of your dollars,' then they shouldn't come."
This is just stupid. A deal involves two parties. New York politicians want the state to back out of their half of the deal, but this guy thinks that they should be able to hold Amazon to their half.
How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
If that's their attitude before they infiltrate, imagine after!
What resources are they going to spend on NY? The 3 billion they get for free from NY just to be there? You sure? You can't even blackmail Bezos with dick pics, you'd think he'd go of even 1 cent?
Amazon HQ2: Texas experience shows why New Yorkers should be skeptical ( https://theconversation.com/am... )
Give them the 3 billion anyway? After the inhabitants of the city just told Amazon to go fuck themselves?
Telling someone to go fuck themself has consequences.
Slashdot - news for outraged progressives!
Yeah, like what General Motors did in Australia.
"Yeah, we need all this funding and financial support to keep car manufacturing here for the next decade. Think of the jobs!"
a year or two later
"We're shutting down all manufacturing in Australia, no you can't have your money back"
Hang on--I need to get some popcorn and watch the Rasp Pi flaming begin. (BTW, I agree with you; raspberry pi is plenty to start learning on. When you get to the limitations, you learn from them, and if necessary you can then get something "better". )
Coming from Michigan I can tell you that decades of hand outs to the big three didn't keep them from closing factories here in the 70's, 80's, and 90's. Same goes for the textile industry in West Michigan.
These deals are unfair to tax payers and even unfair to businesses because they are not distributed equally to all businesses.
I don't think a hammer will teach them about architecture. Wrong tool. But it will teach you about construction. Possibly woodworking. And when you reach the limitations of hammer-and-nail joinery, you can then progress to screws, pocket-hole joinery, dovetail. Maybe even timber framing. Possibly starting a business and hire employees, contributing to multiple families. Go get that hammer--Harbor Freight has some for under $5.
And this my friends is exactly why I am not a big fan of the argument that we should keep taxes low and rely on charities to pay for stuff.
Once the money is given by companies, or billionaire, their donations become concerns for any negotiations. Tax them and where the money is spent is no longer their decision but the public's decision.
Besides, architecture tends to be like Pro Basketball. If you're good & lucky, you make good money. Otherwise, most of the ones I've known are barely getting by.
Well like I said, I learned fundamentals of basic on a timex sinclair. There wasn't even a shell back then.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
It's hard to imagine that Amazon is so naive as to think that dealing with NYC wouldn't be a snake pit, but then you realize it's run by a guy that shoots dick pics to married women with his cell phone and everything makes sense.
Their projections show that they will recoup the cost. Past experience shows these projections are usually wildly optimistic.
Tax incentives and subsidies are a Prisoner's Dilemma. Each locale feels obligated to offer incentives because other locales are offering them. But they would be collectively better off if no one offered them. Amazon would still expand, but do so on the basis of business efficiency rather than subsidies. If NYC wants to attract more businesses, they should improve their overall friendliness to commerce, rather than lavishing subsidies on one corporation.
These subsides are a race to the bottom. This is what the Commerce Clause in the US Constitution was designed to prevent. The CC has often been abused, but a federal ban on these subsidies would be a legitimate use, and would be an overall benefit to the country's economy, and a relief to the taxpayers.
I mostly agree with you. I learned on a commodore 64.
But i have to commend the ones learning on a Timex Sinclair or a raspberry pi. The C64 had tons of (mostly pirated) games. You did a lot of gaming, a little bit of hacking to cheat and a little bit of programming. But they were mainly gaming machines and that is what the kids enjoy.
A raspberry pi on another hand... Nice toy for nerds like yours truly but how many kids are going to play games on it ?
Besides most people need formal training. A cool gaming computer will put many feet on the ladder but for most they won't be enough. It worked for you because you were very resourceful.
Coming from Michigan I can tell you that decades of hand outs to the big three didn't keep them from closing factories here in the 70's, 80's, and 90's.
In order to pay those subsidies they had to increase taxes on OTHER businesses, driving them out of the state and hollowing out the economy. So when the Big 3 left, there was nothing else to fall back on.
You can't lure a kid into programming by thinking that way. A kid can be both, I was, but in the end their interest in programming and/or gaming will be mutually exclusive. I know a kid who is gaming motivated. He likes to hack his nintendo with 3D models and at one point required a Python script. Since he's not interested in programming, he only gains a superficial knowledge of how to install Python on windows and where to put the script and run it. Only if he is interested in development would he attempt to delve into what the script does and entertain the taught of modifying it.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
I don't mean mutually exclusive, I mean independent
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
'We won't come unless we get three billion of your dollars,'
Or, more properly phrased, unless we are allowed to keep three billions of our dollars, which we earned through our enterprise.
Let's not confound a tax exemption with a government handout, OK?
Might makes right irrelevant.
OTOH, if those incentives are instead invested directly into the community, who needs the strings?
America the land of low paid homeless people and corporate welfare, where the rich galavant the world paying no taxes and the poor die because they can't afford healthcare.
Here, the government had the 10 years in writing so roughly on the 10th year+1 day, they announced they were moving and thanks for the billions of dollars. Actually, they didn't even bother saying thanks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
Hello text books, my old friend.
In this particular example the city will recoup all the $3B tax incentive investment in about 5-10 years just from taxes on employees' wages.
If a person told you to give them an interest free loan of 3 billion dollars, and they would have someone else pay you back the same amount every 5-10 years, but with no contract or penalty for noncompliance, would you agree to those terms?
The funny thing is, the companies themselves figured out that race-to-bottom price war is not good for themselves. I guess the public sector will need to repeat the learnin' of the private sector on their own.
Unlikely, Amazon is a parasite. Anything that they get as an incentive to move there is going to be a lot less than what they contribute to the local area.
They've done a pretty thorough job of destroying Seattle and yet those folks in other parts of the country were willing to compete for the same treatment. If Amazon being here was such a great thing, Bezos wouldn't be constantly looking over his shoulder when he's out in public.
Once they are there, you can count on them extorting the locality for whatever they can. We had a head tax briefly slated to go into effect here in Seattle to help counteract the damage that Amazon's presence was doing and they had some illegal meetings with the council and had it nixed. No public meetings, just backroom negotiations and ultimately, the citizens lost. We've got people who are homeless despite having full time jobs here and it's primarily due to Amazon's influence.
Saying that tax breaks are not a direct subsidy is a flat out lie. It this circumstance it's a bribe and for Amazon it's a "head I win tails you loose" proposition. It's just like building sport stadiums: a scam to loot the public treasury for private profit. (Just ask St. Louis or San Diego about the Rams and Chargers moving to LA.)
If you don't think that tax breaks are a subsidy then why not tax religion? Just suggest it. I dare you. Tax breaks are money in the pocket. Besides being declared as an agent of the devil by "legitimate" religious figures some nut job will do a drive by and put a bullet into your house or perhaps toss a Molotov cocktail in your direction.
Everyone who profits from sucking off the public teat is the same: they think their free ride is a natural law of the universe and any other option is a perversion of the natural order. Libertarians are just another set of blood sucking scamsters.
Why is Snark Required?
There's a big difference between building a stadium and building a company. A stadium hardly takes up any jobs, people go there to spend money (taking money OUT of the local economy), people don't want to live near it and generally, once the venture goes bankrupt it leaves the city to clean up and maintain an otherwise useless building.
Tax breaks are just there to bring the company, sure it's a benefit to the company but indirectly and long term, it's a good deal unless the business goes bankrupt. In this case, NYC wouldn't see any tax income from Amazon to begin with, if it reduces the tax bill by $3B, it will see ~$0.6B in income taxes per year and the estimated $2.5B/y in business it brings to the area. It's not "money out of anyone's pocket", it's just taxes it wouldn't have collected anyway.
I think religion should be taxed unless it brings benefit to the local community, in that case, (good) churches generally take care of a bunch of stuff local governments simply suck at - providing food and shelter for the poor etc etc. In most areas, a church spends between $200-800k/year on social programs for a mere $10,000/year in property taxes and maybe $50k in income taxes for the full time staff.
Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
Or like what the movie studios currently do to us here in New Zealand.
We pay 25% of the cost of every "international" film or TV series produced here, with no cap, so James Cameron is going to make a bunch of Avatar movies, and we're going to pay him millions to do it.
The Minister in charge made noises about turning money tap off last year, but quickly backed down because I assume threats were made behind closed doors.
Don't worry, Amazon won't be filming the LOTR series here.
Amazon is not a stadium (which are also often funded with public money). It will have employees. These employees will have high salary ($100-$150k) and the city will tax it. I don't see any way for it to NOT work.
If this person also commiteed to hire 25 thousand people each of which will pay 5% of their salary to me? Yes, please.
They've done a pretty thorough job of destroying Seattle
The last time I looked, Seattle is still there.
if a parent these days want their kids to learn then they can get a raspberry pi.
I suppose buying them a hammer will teach them architecture.
You are operating on the education ideal, which shows that gender studies programs make for better relationships between men and women?
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Your Minister probably backed down because the accountants showed him the math. Why do you assume the worst?
Hang on--I need to get some popcorn and watch the Rasp Pi flaming begin. (BTW, I agree with you; raspberry pi is plenty to start learning on. When you get to the limitations, you learn from them, and if necessary you can then get something "better". )
Sure won't get any Overcooked Pi's from me. Those little things are exactly what kids and adults should learn on. I think a lot of the more structured teachings try to get them into programming a bit too quickly - let 'em learn unix/linux first, then set 'em loose.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
I don't see any way for it to NOT work.
PT Barnum loved people like you.
How many $100-$150k software engineers in NYC are currently unemployed?
Most of these employees will just be shifted from other businesses, which aren't being subsidized, forcing them to either cut back or leave the city. There may be some net job growth, but it is unlikely it is going to be worth $3 billion.
Most tech companies in NYC are already desperate for talent. The limit on creating high paying jobs is not companies willing to hire them, but housing available for people to move to the city. Approving new building permits (cost: ~$0) would do WAY more to grow the NYC economy that this handout to Amazon.
But there is one thing you can be certain of: The politicians are going to label this as a "success" by highlighting every job at Amazon, while ignoring the equivalent number of jobs destroyed elsewhere in the city.
they said that about Sears also at one point.
but like all things, it ebbs and flows
if you see me, smile and say hello.
I never claimed that the city isn't there. I claimed that it was being destroyed, by your argument, Detroit must be just fine because it's still there.
Seattle isn't anywhere near the point where Detroit is, but allowing one company to grow to be such a large portion of the local economy is a huge mistake. We didn't have the issues with homelessness before Amazon came and distorted the housing market. The housing market wasn't great, but people buying in expected to be here for the long haul, not to be buying it in lieu of a rental that they could dump when they left for more than they paid.
Amazon also primarily employees men, which means there are now many thousands of men more than there are women, which makes dating largely impossible. I can easily count on one hand the number of men I've met here that have actually gotten married locally. It just doesn't happen that much because we're all stuck competing with men making 6 figures and an ever changing supply that just reinforces the narcissism that women around here have always had.
Not to mention the various local businesses that Amazon has put out of business and the destruction to things like trees and their near complete lack of contribution back into the local economy. They wouldn't be here if they weren't being subsidized and Bezos has made that quite clear.
Because nobody has been able to make any sort of case for the country making any sort of profit from the movie business subsidies.
If we made a profit somehow I'm sure the tourist people would be crowing from the rooftops about it, but instead the talk was all about the jobs that would be lost.
As far as I am concerned, any business that needs taxpayer's money to stay afloat is not really a business.
How many $100-$150k software engineers in NYC are currently unemployed?
It's pretty clear that Amazon will attract more people to the NY. It's also not known for its software companies, so the talent pool is not that deep.
Most of these employees will just be shifted from other businesses, which aren't being subsidized, forcing them to either cut back or leave the city. There may be some net job growth, but it is unlikely it is going to be worth $3 billion.
Nope, Amazon will increase competition which will drive up wages. Higher wages mean more income for the NYC. I still fail to see how NY would lose. And don't forget that Amazon is going to spend a lot of money in NY directly, on new building construction.
As someone who grew up in New York, I have to say that Amazon would be a weird fit. New York is one of the last places in American where a small business owner... well where you can be your own person and own your own company without being a slave to a franchise.
I'm planning on visiting the states next week with my children, we'll head to Clearwater Florida, an area I know where as I lived there for about 6 years. We make lists of things to do before going there and with the exception of Disney and the Museum of Science and Industry, all of our money is expected to be spent at chains and franchises.
When we travel to New York, we instead make plans to spend our money at family owned places. This includes pizzerias, electronic shops, etc...
New York is maybe the only place left in the entire U.S. that I've seen that people protect their family owned stores and prefer paying an extra 10% if it means shopping for groceries at a store where you know the owner personally.
Amazon will place a great deal of pressure on the environment to embrace chains. In fact, by simply having a large presence in the area, it will likely have a terrible impact on local stores as well as the health of the people in the community since it would convince people to order online and have things delivered by drone since a NY presence could mean 30 minutes or less for pretty much anything.
That said, NY wastes a massive amount of... well pretty much everything. Take a visit to Starette City and you might be horrified. Since New Yorkers have the best of everything... the best meat, the best cheeses, the best of anything since NY has always made that a core component of the culture. You can sit at most good restaurants and eat fresh Maine lobster and aged Kobe beef with fine Russian beluga caviar and it would not be considered odd to ask for such a thing. When ordering sushi, being asked "Nova Scotian, Norwegian or Japanese" regarding your salmon is a real possibility.
The single mega company brings with it a real benefit to the whole world. Grocery stores and restaurants all around the world manage their perishable items poorly. As more stores eliminate the in-store butcher, it's getting far worse. Meat, fish, dairy, vegetables etc... they are placed on display... defrosted because people want the illusion of shopping for fresh goods. People don't want to choose something from a computer screen and pick it up from a counter after it's been prepared, not when the fresh lovely colors of all the products are visible on display elsewhere.
Amazon will be able to store all perishables far longer than a grocery store which will generate substantially less waste. I've seen numbers on the order of 30% of all food is thrown away. I don't believe these numbers. I've watched grocery stores throw away 50% or more of their unsold meat and dairy.
Improves logistics from Amazon will help society as a whole, but it will eliminated hundreds of millions of jobs world wide. And this is as it should be. We need to start moving to minimizing. Commercialization is destroying us. So, as long as Amazon continues to find a way to find a balance of killing off jobs and still having someone left with money to sell to, they should be welcomed.
As for the $3 billion, that's not nearly as much money as it once was. And by simply giving it away like that, it will save New York years and tons of money trying to collect taxes from a company who has a legal team far more powerful than the state does. Remember, just because you lose a huge law suit that says you have to pay a billion dollars, it doesn't actually mean you'll pay it... you will just have to move to another negotiation that will let government right it off as a loss.
It's also not known for its software companies
NYC is the second biggest tech cluster in the world, bested only by the SF Bay Area. The heaviest concentrations are in the Flatiron District of Manhattan, and around the multiple world class universities, including Columbia and NYU.
so the talent pool is not that deep.
There are more than 300,000 tech workers in NYC, one of the deepest and widest talent pools in the world.
I still fail to see how NY would lose.
Look at the history of corporate welfare. Count the successes. Count the failures. Apply evidence-based reasoning.
The process of placing HQ2 considers cost and resources and not .. environment? Look at a sat picture of the chosen area. Its already packed full of people and civilization. How about going across the river and taking up a place in NJ? Plenty of space and an educated workforce and a local airport,Lots of Highways and .. Ok... a mediocre mass transit system. Amazon, make a solid impact on the place you chose to make your nest. See beyond the green stuff.
Time for a new Political party in the US (or two!) One is off the rails Other cant pony up a leader.
NYC is the second biggest tech cluster in the world, bested only by the SF Bay Area.
Nope, Seattle is bigger. NY labor dept puts the number of IT personnel at 73 thousand: https://www.labor.ny.gov/stats... , Seattle and Bellevue have about 100k IT workers.
IT in the Seattle area got so big that software developers are now more numerous than retail workers: https://www.seattletimes.com/s... , NYC is nowhere close to that.
Look at the history of corporate welfare. Count the successes. Count the failures. Apply evidence-based reasoning.
Actually, there are plenty of successes. Boeing, SpaceX, Tesla - all got big in part because of corporate welfare.
Mine wasn't.
Ignore last part of previous comment. I posted that before reading this one. My sentiment about lure remains.
Actually, there are plenty of successes. Boeing, SpaceX, Tesla - all got big in part because of corporate welfare.
Good job! Now count the failures.
First off, your point about Boeing is exactly why Amazon shouldn't be allowed to continue to grow here.
Secondly, citation needed, most of the homeless here are pushed out by housing prices. Not by drugs. It's virtually impossible to find a place anywhere in the city that normal people can actually afford to rent.
As far as Mary's Place goes, that's at best a bandage and it's mostly there so that Amazon can claim to care while doing that absolute bare minimum. In practice, due to all the high salaries and people only being hired from outside the city, the ability to afford housing is beyond the reach of many people.
''commiteed'', LOL.
You're a moron.
Guess Bezos can only handle being the extorter, not the extortee.
why not tax religion? Just suggest it. I dare you
Tax religion. Go for it. Treat them as exactly what they are: Profit generating businesses.
Better yet, regulate them. Prevent them from preying on vulnerable people and forbid them from self-policing. Maybe we can reduce the numbers of children abused.
I'd happily vote for this.
Define "long run".
Quite often the companies get tax reductions or outright eliminations for N years and then close up and move somewhere else after N-1 years. IIRC, IBM did that in N. Carolina. Motorola did that in Illinois---more than once: the never really completed Harvard manufacturing plant, abandoning the large, long-lived facility in Schaumburg for Chicago and other suburbs that offered sweet tax deals. I'm sure more examples can be found. This business of playing states (and cities) against each other to receive all sorts of tax breaks, immunity from environmental regulations, etc., should be stopped. Here's hoping that states/cities do more push back like NYC is doing.
CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
I'm just making a guess but by 'incentives' what is usually meant is 'not being required to pay taxes'.
I've always thought it a highly disingenuous attitude suggest that someone is 'getting something for free' by not paying money. It is the idea that we somehow 'owe' taxes of a certain amount to the government, because THEY provide 'Services'. Honestly I would be happy a a LOT fewer 'services' and a lot more of my own money , that I can then either spend as needed , or use to help people I know personally.
I think especially city and state but certainly federal government, should stay out of anything that requires them to enforce religious opinions on the general populous. 2 fine examples are health care and public schools. How many lawsuits about one religious freedom issue or another have we had that effects the public school system. The best solution is to get government out of it and return the money to the people. Let them self organize to educate their children.
âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
Come visit New Orleans....very much like that here too.
Especially on the restaurant side of things...when in NOLA proper, I rarely see a chain restaurant place to eat, unless it is a local chain.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
It's also not known for its software companies, so the talent pool is not that deep.
I take it you've never heard of Silicon Alley.
Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
The articles I can find suggest that the opposite is true:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amazons-1-billion-in-tax-breaks-does-it-pay-off-for-cities/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/j... Everything I have seen says that tax incentives to businesses go to large corporations while the drivers of a strong economy are small businesses and that small businesses suffer from the arrival of a new large corporation in the area.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
Not everybody loses.
Life is a competition. It just is.
it's a competition at all levels from who gets the most attractive guy/girl to who gets to be top surgeon to who gets that brand spanking new Amazon HQ2.
Yes, we put in place rules to make the competition 'fair'. I can't just kidnap the most attractive spouse I want and take them. That would be unfair.
Regions never stop getting money from taxes.
So New York gives some tax breaks to a corporation. All the workers for the corporation pay income tax, sales tax, and better yet... have jobs so they don't have to rely as much on government support. At the end of the day, all taxes are paid by people. Even investors are people who pay capital gains and other taxes. The government gets its money no matter what happens. All that matters is people get to brand it corporate taxes or whatever.
At this point in history, a company who offers thousands of jobs in a region is highly valuable. What does your region offer than others don't? Why would they pick your region instead of another region?
Some regions do better than others. Educated work force. Good university system. Already existing supply chain, transit, stable government...
You can definitely limit competition if you want. Generally that means limiting trading zones, but inside your zone, it's a competition. You can definitely move away from competition and allocate it via government. Every region gets x number tech jobs and y number nursing jobs...
One could even propose that since all taxes are paid by people, set the corporate tax rate to 0 to prevent this kind of tax shopping and just tax people. About the only tax you would need is something to prevent the corporation from hoarding money. But beyond that you capture all the money by either taxing investors and employees.
The "long run" result is that once one company discovers that they can avoid taxes by pitting one locality against another in a bidding war, then all companies start to do that, and essentially what happens is that municipalities stop getting revenue from taxes. So they have to tax their residents instead. Everybody loses.
Not everybody loses. Life is a competition. It just is.
In a zero sum game, that would be true-- in that case it's a competition, some people do better, some do worse.
Society is, however, not a zero sum game. When companies pit community against community to get the best deal to avoid taxes, at the individual level, the company has won, but at the overall level, when all the companies do that, everybody loses.
(Unless you're a radical libertarian, and think the government is evil. Then not paying taxes is a good thing in and of itself-- schools and roads and sewers are evil socialism!--and the companies who manage to avoid taxes best are altruistic. Yay, tax avoiders!)
the rest of your post misses this point. You don't seem to understand prisoner's dilemma payout, where a company may have incentive to do X, but if all companies do X, everybody hurts.
and some of your post is simply baffling. "You can definitely limit competition if you want." The discussion is about one municipality competing against another municipality, but your comment goes on as if we were talking about governments limiting a company's competition against other companies. Restriction of trade is irrelevant here, because that's not what we're talking about.
But that is exactly what it is when you make it look like a lot of fun. At some point they will find out it won't be and at that point they lose interest or they don't.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Ideally, a starter curriculum should start away from an OS. That you picked one just shows you have a bias, no more.
So you are going to teach someone to program when they have zero idea how a computer works? any mention of an operating system must be avoided. I don't think so.
You have to start somewhere. And it makes sense to start simple. A Pi is about as simple as it gets, an Arduino is simpler, but I don't think it is a good learning device for group activities.
The whole process is charming, from downloading the NOOBS Linux OS to putting the system together, to booting and running. That terminal is Linux is merely what you use to get around some things in the computer.
Your method apparently is based on writing the code on paper, then someone takes it away to a mysterious secret OS computer, then telling you if it worked or not.
Sorry, but since all the software based computing devices I know have an Operating system, you have to choose one.
Side note: You can get W10 for IoT devices on Pi, and a couple others, like RISC OS, (non Linux), or even an OS that boots to BASIC https://www.raspberrypi.org/do...
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Amazon should take the HQ2 to another city, perhaps in Alabama where the German rocket scientists went after World War II. The children and grandchildren of the scientists that built the Saturn V rocket for the Apollo moon landings are in Alabama, and they could handle all the AWS programming needed by Amazon and more.