Slashdot Mirror


Samsung is Loading McAfee Antivirus Software On Smart TVs (techspot.com)

Samsung is adding bloatware to its 2019 TVs because McAfee is paying them to do so. From a report: There is arguably no reason at all for Samsung to offer a third-party antivirus software for an operating system that is developed in house. Partnering with software vendors is fairly common practice for large hardware manufacturers. Laptop makers frequently preinstall bloatware in return for some sizable payouts and smartphone OEMs are no different. Samsung is now installing McAfee antivirus software on its 2019 TV lineup.

Samsung is claiming something to the effect of wanting to protect users from malware. On the surface that makes sense, but Samsung is running its very own Tizen OS on all of its TVs. Instead of adding more junk to a TV, why not just improve the OS? The answer though is very self explanatory. Samsung would not receive a payout from McAfee if it did not install the unneeded software.

89 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. hold on.. by e432776 · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. is that TV running MS Windows??

    1. Re: hold on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You get the award for not rtfa AND not rtfs.

    2. Re: hold on.. by I-am-a-Banana · · Score: 1

      Except suggesting or joking that viruses are "Windows issues only" is like so 1990's.

  2. Raise the price, please by tomhath · · Score: 2

    I would much rather pay a higher price and be without all that crap. If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.

    1. Re:Raise the price, please by oic0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very few. Most people buy a TV because it's a good deal for the size in a big box store. They don't understand any specs except buzzwords like HD, smart, and 4k.

    2. Re:Raise the price, please by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.

      I'd be surprised if many did take it. Almost everything I know about marketing says that the segment of the market that cares that much about this is minuscule. The ones that don't will continue to use price as a prime criterion for their purchase decision.

      --
      That is all.
    3. Re: Raise the price, please by tomhath · · Score: 1

      How hard is this?

      Pretty much impossible when your TV service is supplied via internet and/or wireless router.

    4. Re:Raise the price, please by havana9 · · Score: 1

      If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.

      I'd be surprised if many did take it. Almost everything I know about marketing says that the segment of the market that cares that much about this is minuscule. The ones that don't will continue to use price as a prime criterion for their purchase decision.

      People that are using price as criterion are going to the cheaper brands, especially the ones that in CRT era were famous for their quality, like Telefunken, Nordmende, Saba or Akai.
      On the other hand most people don't understand all the TV features, I know people that have bought a new TV with terrestrial and satellite tuner without having a satellite dish because it was a special offer and was cheap, same thing goes for smart options or similar things.
      Most people are ok with normal TV and actually don't mind extra features because the TV are nowasays cheap. I remember when having the Teletext option on a TV meant to have to pay for an extra board installed, so nobody used Teletext, then Teletext was included on the mainboard and people simply didn'use it...

    5. Re: Raise the price, please by sinij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Treat your TV as a display and connect it to another device that you control and can secure. I have old desktop with a wireless keyboard and my TV is connected via HDMI cable to that.

    6. Re: Raise the price, please by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I got news for you, in a very short time they will come with a 5G radio that you dont control. It will connect to the home base, period.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:Raise the price, please by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But ... but ... but ... CHECKBOX TICK!

      Because that's what steers buyer decisions. People don't understand what their TVs can do. To them, HDMI is about the same as DLNA, four letters that their TV "has". Or doesn't have. But having is better than not having. So what these people do is to compare TVs by the little cards that are attached to them, and by the checkboxes that are ticked on each of them. And if there's one TV with 6 checkboxes ticked it's better than the one with 5 checkboxes ticked. Which checkboxes? Why should he care, he doesn't know what the things that are ticked there are anyway.

      But it has one checkbox tick more! So it is better!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Raise the price, please by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Me too, but the TV won't act like a dumb display and just always default to hdmi input... The smart and tuner functions keep popping up and i have to switch it back to hdmi input.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    9. Re:Raise the price, please by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      As for 4K- seems superfluous to my demands, it would be nice, be don't need the extra cost, and the cable ISP that has a monopoly in my area isn't good enough to really support 4K straming so it's a waste on me anyway.

      Console games are SOOO much better in 4k, though! That's what I use it for.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    10. Re: Raise the price, please by Pascoea · · Score: 2

      I share your prediction. Good thing I'm handy with a soldering iron.

      Honestly, I'd be shocked if there weren't already agreements between the TV manufacturers and companies like Comcast to let their TVs have unfettered access to the Xfinity WiFi that their modems are pumping out. My Vizio monitor is required to be connected to WiFi in order to control anything about the TV beyond basic on/off functions. I just relegated the damn thing to it's own "guest" network that doesn't get access to the internet. Fuck them and their spying bullshit.

    11. Re:Raise the price, please by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      1080p is on the way out with manufacturers. They have all moved most of their panel lines over to 4K production. They still make 1080p sets, but they are usually bottom of the barrel and way outnumbered by 4K at this point. As for dumb TVs, unless you want to go with a commercial panel (and the cost that goes with it) your best bet is eBay/Craig's list for older used devices. It's getting impossible to find.

      The really unfortunate part, based on how some "apps" are coming out on smart TV stores before they are hitting Apple/Google/Roku/Fire stores, I think the unwashed masses are pulling another "It's good enough" and actually using the damn smart TV apps.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    12. Re: Raise the price, please by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > in a very short time they will come with a 5G radio that you dont control

      And, what? You think they won't have a HDMI port? Jesus, even the worst bargain-priced Black Friday piece of shit in electronics history came with a HDMI port, composite+stereo, and an antenna input. Most have multiple HDMI, a component port or two, at least one s-video plus multiple composite & stereo inputs, Toslink and/or S/PDIF input (and usually, one for output, see note).

      Many even have a useless VGA port ("useless", because the mfr. limits it to 1024x768, and explicitly disallows 16:9 640/704/720 x 480/576, or any other mode that might be useful for media... but handle even 1920x1080@50/59.94/60 just fine if your laptop has a video chip that can output component video using vga-port pins & you have the right octopus cable).

      One MAJOR reason why mfrs (in the US, at least) love "smart" TVs: they can sell a TV with the hardware to receive OTA broadcast atsc, but only pay royalties for users who actually "activate" the capability online. The royalties aren't cheap ($10-20/set, I think), and they're required by law to include a tuner on any device marketed as a "TV" (vs "computer monitor"), but most people don't actually USE the tuner (and many who WOULD just give up when presented with an 'online activation' step), so it's an easy way for the mfr. to save millions of dollars in royalties.

      ---

      note: 99.999% of TVs made after 2006 that have toslink or spdif out will only use it to output PCM 2.0 stereo for content extracted from HDMI. OTA is hit or miss... AFAIK, they're ALLOWED to output DD5.1 via toslink/spdif for OTA content, and can pass through DD5.1 FROM toslink/spdif, but many just blindly downconvert EVERYTHING to 2.0 stereo.

    13. Re: Raise the price, please by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Tinfoil still works!!!
      Wrap that rascal!!!

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    14. Re:Raise the price, please by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would much rather pay a higher price and be without all that crap. If vendors would offer that as an option I expect they would be surprised how many people would take it.

      They do offer that. Buy a commercial display intended for digital signage in a conference center. They are dumb, and usually have lots of inputs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re: Raise the price, please by peragrin · · Score: 1

      That isn't hard. Use a Roku, Apple TV, or firetv as your source inout and the tb itself doesn't have to connect.

      I use Roku. While Roku wants a credit card I used one that was expiring, and haven't updated it.

      If I want new subscriptions I subscribe either directly or through Amazon.

      Directly has the benefit of cancelling easier

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    16. Re: Raise the price, please by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "And, what? You think they won't have a HDMI port? "

      You are Missing the point.

      If it has a 5g radio built in, with its cellular network access cost worked out as some combination of an advertising deal with facebook, a bulk volume bandwidth pre-purchase from your local ISP. Then YOU won't need to hook it up to the internet, because when you turn it on out of the box, it already has an internet connection, ready to send all the telemetry while downloading software updates and advertising from the word go.

      It doesn't need to be on your network, so it doesn't need to go through your firewall.

      What possible security or control do you hope to gain from it having an hdmi port?

      Maybe, if you are lucky, there will an option in settings to turn it off, and maybe if your are lucky they will honor that setting. Otherwise, unless you live in a concrete subbasement basement, a faraday cage, or the artic circle... your TV will be online.

    17. Re: Raise the price, please by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If you donâ(TM)t want a smart TV, donâ(TM)t connect it to the internet. How hard is this?

      I think you miss the point. Of course I can just not set up the smart parts of the TV... I just don't want them. Or the extra costs involved in making the smart TV. Why pay extra for a feature I have no use for?

      $20 you can get a superior external device that you can replace- why would I want an inferior product, that I can't replace, and have to pay more for it as a result?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    18. Re: Raise the price, please by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Blessed be our telescreens

    19. Re: Raise the price, please by sinij · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, my TV doesn't do this and defaults to last input that was used. HDMI in my case.

    20. Re: Raise the price, please by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would they waste money on a 5G modem and on-going cellular data costs when the user is very likely to connect it to their wifi for free anyway?

      Also it would be pointless in Europe because the user could just decline he mandatory opt-in permission request, and agreement cannot legally be forced by making it mandatory to use the functions of the TV.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Raise the price, please by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, since McAfee is likely paying per TV it's installed in, the price might actually drop the more garbage they load in. Then, customers might tend to buy the cheaper (more bloat-ridden) TVs and this could become the norm.

      I really hope not, though. I don't even connect my TV to my WiFi. I use a Roku stick to stream. I'd buy a "dumb TV" if they offered them anymore. I definitely don't need an anti-virus program on my TV.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    22. Re: Raise the price, please by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Just do what I do. Don't connect your TV to WiFi. Instead, plug in a Roku stick (or Fire Stick or Chromecast) and connect THAT to your WiFi. The TV won't be exposed to the Internet at all.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    23. Re:Raise the price, please by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      At that size, get a 1080p monitor. Plenty of those to go around.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    24. Re: Raise the price, please by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      If tinfoil works for your head it should work for your TV too.

    25. Re: Raise the price, please by mentil · · Score: 1

      HDMI actually has a network data channel, so the TV might yet have network access. Also, some TVs are promiscuous and connect to open WAPs without permission.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    26. Re: Raise the price, please by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I share your prediction. Good thing I'm handy with a soldering iron.

      Just wait until you get sued under the DMCA for "circumvention"

    27. Re: Raise the price, please by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > What possible security or control do you hope to gain from it having an hdmi port?

      Er.... being able to completely ignore the remainder of the TV's alleged capabilities, and use it as a dumb video display to watch content using devices that ARE under my own control? With a means of directly feeding video into my TV and using it directly as a dumb video display, everything else becomes largely moot.

      > your TV will be online.

      Big. Fscking. Deal. If it's not on my home network, and I'm using it as a dumb video display, the TV can ping a 5G carrier forever (at the TV-vendor's expense) for all I care.

      I mean, seriously. There's "security-aware", then there's "tinfoil-hat-paranoia". What do you seriously think someone like Samsung or Toshiba is going to do, secretly send screen-captures of your HDMI-fed content back to their servers just so they can find nefarious ways to violate your privacy? It would be legal suicide, if only because it would only be a matter of time until some copyright holder sued the TV manufacturer for infringement (since those screenshots technically wouldn't have been authorized by the copyright holder).

      Worst-case, your 7 year old smart TV someday connects to a 5G network without your permission, gets bricked by hackers exploiting an old vulnerability, and you join the class-action lawsuit against the manufacturer and end up getting a free new TV out of the deal. Vendors can make all the noise they like about disclaimers, warranties, and EULAs... if a company big enough to make smart TVs gets caught with its pants down like that, they WILL take a legal beating in at least one jurisdiction somewhere in the world.

    28. Re: Raise the price, please by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "Worst-case, your 7 year old smart TV someday connects to a 5G network without your permission, gets bricked by hackers"

      Worst case? You lack imagination friend.

      Worst case hackers grab it via shodan etc; and turn it into a cryptocoin miner, so it cranks at full cpu usage 24x7 on you, while they allocate the rest of the available flash storage on it (since it needs to be able to download new apps and app updates) to serve child porn, while using the built in camera and mic (it came with skype video calls as it one of its apps...); to stream your living room out to creeps and wierdos...

      Some of those TVs will belong to attractive women. Some to people with young kids. Some will be in bedrooms. .... they tie the feed up to rudimentary AI to peek in now and again and flag interesting TVs / interesting content (for whatever value of interesting you care to apply.)

      Then when someone sends your daughter a link to her live cam performance... you'll eventually join a class action lawsuit and collect a $45.08 settlement another decade after that.

      Meanwhile your new TV is just as bad.

      Really the smart TVs are *already* that bad; but they're safely behind quality consumer NAT routers from linksys and netgear... that are 7 years old with documented unpatched exploits.

      Meanwhile... it's already been demonstrated... welcome to the future... 6 years ago.
      https://www.iclarified.com/325...

    29. Re:Raise the price, please by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Any reason one can't use a computer monitor as a TV?

    30. Re: Raise the price, please by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Oh, please. An average "smart" TV is dumber than a 4 year old Roku. An average gaming mouse probably has more onboard flash than an average "smart" TV.

      Cryptocoin mining? Give me a break. The "smart" TVs I've seen huff and puff just trying to display a fsck'ing MENU on the screen. Their ability to decode h.264 on the fly is an illusion... it's all done by limited-purpose hardware, stapled together by a "computer" that's about as powerful as a SNES.

      Serving child porn? Via some mystical 5G free data that was forced on you by the TV manufacturer? Don't make me laugh. The only thing 5G is going to bring America is higher average monthly phone bills. Even IF (big IF) future "smart" TVs include "free" 5G data service for some purpose, you can bet your ASS it's only going to be "free" to use for accessing the services of specific partner companies. The only way any "smart" TV is EVER going to be capable of using "5G" to stream ANYTHING outbound from your house is if you've intentionally paid for that service. So no, I'm not about to lose the slightest bit of sleep worrying that hackers are going to use my future TV to stream child porn over 5G data I can't disable, because I'm not going to PAY for 5G data service for my TV above and beyond what I'll already be paying for fiber, and I probably won't BOTHER with the TV's "smart" functionality anyway, because it'll be too stupid and crippled compared to all the discrete devices I'll have available to use instead.

      And in any case, if my TV gets hacked and is somehow being used to stream child porn, it'll be one of approximately 20-30 million compromised TVs doing exactly the same thing at that point. Paraphrasing Stalin a bit, "one person serving child porn is an evil pervert... 20 million people inadvertently serving child porn via hacked smart TVs is a statistic".

      Camera? Meet electrical tape. And worry MORE about the half-dozen OTHER cameras strewn around the house, most of which will have less real security than the TV ultimately does.

      Mic? The battle is already lost. If you have fewer than four dozen internet-connected microphones within 100 feet of the TV at that point, you'll probably be lucky. If someone really wants to eavesdrop on you, they won't HAVE to hack YOUR devices... they'll be able to hack your neighbors' devices and use them as directional listening devices against you anyway.

      Look at it this way. If you're in a group with 10 people getting chased by a hungry bear, you don't have to be able to out-run the bear, you just need to outrun the slowest member or two of the group and be a less-appealing target so the bear will capture and eat THEM instead of you. Your future smart TV will be one device out of literally trillions of minimally-secure devices spread around the world. Use it as a dumb monitor with your own discrete media devices, and it's unlikely to be one of your biggest likely future security problems.

    31. Re: Raise the price, please by vux984 · · Score: 1

      "Oh, please. An average "smart" TV is dumber than a 4 year old Roku."

      Extrapolate to a future where its got a 5g radio, and it'll have at least a mediocre mobile SoC like you'd see in an android or iphone, a couple GB ram, and enough SSD. You can already get android tvs.

      "Even IF (big IF) future "smart" TVs include "free" 5G data service for some purpose"

      You can already get lots of devices that include cellular data at no extra charge. Where 'lifetime data' has been prepaid in an arrangement with carriers; yes on the anticipation that *lifetime* data is going to be a couple GB or something. I've seen cellular timecard punch clocks for example. Company i worked with bought one not even realizing it; they were floored when it just worked and connected up without even being joined to the wifi.

      "you can bet your ASS it's only going to be "free" to use for accessing the services of specific partner companies."

      Sure. If you are using it properly for its intended purpose you'd be right. Once its been pwned all bets are off on what it can or can't do.

      " and I probably won't BOTHER with the TV's "smart" functionality anyway, "

      Who cares what you were bothering to do? Once its pwned it'll overheat and crash, and run out memory and crash, and run out of storage and crash... all while you are trying to use it as a dumb monitor.

      "Camera? Meet electrical tape."

      Really? I thought only people with tin foil hats wandered around taping up their appliances.

      "20 million people inadvertently serving child porn via hacked smart TVs is a statistic"

      I'm not suggesting you'll be legally liable. Just that you are contributing to the problem by running an insecure pwned piece of crap.

      Grandma with her virus laden PC she only uses to look at cat pictures isn't really at risk of identity theft herself... she ONLY looks at cat pictures, so the viruses really don't pose her much of a threat... but she's still contributing yet another unit to the botnet knocking services out in DDOS, ,sending spam, and so forth. Now her TV is another one. Just because its not draining her bank account doesn't make it ok.

      " And worry MORE about the half-dozen OTHER cameras strewn around the house"

      What other cameras? What other mics? my phone? lieing flat on a desk in the office on a charger. my laptop... sleeping. both are under support. both are updated constantly. the tv is upright in the living room facing into the room 24x7 and its never truly off.

      and it hasn't gotten an update since i got it. But i do what you say. one hdmi cable up from my amp. a roku, pc, nintendo switch, connected to the amp. its not on wifi, its not on ethernet.

      But it doesn't have a cellular connection; so its not really at risk. but cellular is coming. You sayd "big IF" but i say inevitable. the cost is dropping like a stone, and its soooo much easier to get it so that 'it just works' if you don't have to get the consumer to get it on to their wifi. no more support calls when the consumer gets a new wifiap and their tv stops working... etc etc. the manufacturers want this. badly.

    32. Re: Raise the price, please by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      You know how i know you dont read science fiction or history?

      --
      Good-bye
  3. So-called "smart" anything are cancer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are literally cancer. They spread and ruin everything in their way. Dystopian nightmare of total surveillance.

  4. Re: It's a conglomerate, writer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Each part of a business has to make money in order, someone, somewhere in Samsung cares about the extra money

  5. The proles have arrived by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was a golden age of tech (and of computing in particular), when only the intelligent, self-sufficient, industrious, unabashedly eccentric types were interested in it.

    Then, gaming made tech fun.

    Then, Apple made tech cool.

    Then, Android made tech ubiquitous.

    Now, tech is firmly in the sticky, unwashed hands of the proletariat, and it's time to move on to more secluded grounds. See you there!

    1. Re:The proles have arrived by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Let them have their locked-in TVs and smartphones. It's not like we have to use them, and if it makes them happy, at least they don't stumble into our turfs.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:The proles have arrived by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      Where are these new secluded grounds? I've searched and searched but it seems all the world is filled

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    3. Re:The proles have arrived by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, but it is pretty trivial to lobotomize them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re: The proles have arrived by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      AOL made tech ubiquitous; Windows was just the conduit.

    5. Re:The proles have arrived by ScottyKUtah · · Score: 1

      I remember the glory days of usenet, before AOL invaded...

      --
      He who laughs last is at 300 baud.
    6. Re:The proles have arrived by Falos · · Score: 1

      "Error 4001: Please contact support."

      It's 2019 and we are infatuated with software/hardware that must ask permission to even turn on. Which means you're not the owner of your own property.

    7. Re:The proles have arrived by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As long as I have it in my possession, I can manipulate it to do my bidding. It might not be easy for everyone, but that doesn't mean that I cannot do it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  6. AV on TV by slash.jit · · Score: 2

    I hate AVs in computers itself so never install it. But I guess we won't be able to uninstall it from TV.

    Lets look at potential issues with this

    Performance issues with TV
    More internet usage for AV updates [That goes from our bill ]
    Random removal of TV apps which are considered as virus by AV
    Annoying messages for AV updates
    Annoying messages for upgrading to premium version
    What else?

    1. Re:AV on TV by supremebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm curious... how this is going to work? Is it going to work like the McAfee bloatware on retail PC, where I'm going to get pestered to upgrade to the "Pro" version every time I turn on the TV?

      Also, do I have the option to uninstall the software? If not, I'm pretty sure that they're going to lose some customers over this.

      (Frankly, I'm amazed that Microsoft hasn't allowed AntiVirus programs for the XBox yet. It's much more like a PC than a SmartPC is.

    2. Re:AV on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, because tv consumers care about "bloatware." It is less than 1% of the consumer market that would care. Most tv consumers are LOOKING for these apps on their tv's to make it easier.

    3. Re:AV on TV by taustin · · Score: 2

      If it affects the TV operation the way it does a PC, consumers will care. They'll have to run the TV on fast forward all the time to compensate for the slow-down, and fast forward usually disables the sound.

    4. Re:AV on TV by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      According to McAfee you can actually delete it: https://service.mcafee.com/web...

      I guess you "need" it because Tizen OS has an app store and like all app stores it sometimes gets malware in it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:AV on TV by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Sure you can delete it, but apparently it's quite an involved process.

    6. Re:AV on TV by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Dont forget added data mining by the AV too.

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
  7. Re:It's a conglomerate, writer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really, Samsung is heavy industry. Their consumer crap is like a hobby. But they have to fill the ships they build with something so that they're not empty when going out to bring in more raw materials. I mean, you shouldn't see the waitress walking around empty handed.

  8. I like my TVs the way I like my toasters... by stevegee58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...DUMB

    1. Re:I like my TVs the way I like my toasters... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Frakkin Cylons!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  9. You kiddin' me? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now my TV runs so slow it's showing first-run episodes of Star Trek: TNG.

  10. Welp by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

    Welp, guess my next TV will be from LG.

    1. Re:Welp by slash.jit · · Score: 2

      Right.. Next will be LG coming with TVs with Nortan AV installed

  11. Malware as standard by Going_Digital · · Score: 4, Informative

    Samsung TVs already come with pre-installed malware that plays ads to you!

  12. Off sourcing a core function? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If the so called anti virus is just a digital signature verification system to make certain that the firmware and so called apps are legit then it makes sense. Could be that MacAfee is just taking over what is becoming an essential function of their software control quality control. I guess that all the experience of years spent building a software digital signature checking system that run at high priority make it so that it is cheaper for Samsung to outsource the essential process rather than do the essential coding in house.

    Remember Windows without so called antivirus? You install XP and put it on the net without a French safe first and bingo you got screwed before you even got to do a Windows update. It is just a matter of time before you get your new TV home turn on the wifi or plug in the cable and POOF you get hosed. I am sure there are people out there with a bone to pick going after every OS with a network stack and it is just a matter of time before Samsung and all the other device manufactures start getting their firmware hacked the way Windows OS did. Don't forget we are seeing online hacking of things like baby monitors so I am sure that Samsung TVs are an even sweeter target for the digital dick heads that run the bot nets. Just imagine this: a future bit coin con scam that hoses your TV and asks for a ransom to get Fox News and at the same time steals your Netflix account info and credit card info. ;-0 At least Samsung did not make a pact with the Russian Putin controlled AVG group. Or worse still, the Norton/NSA group!

  13. Sven Toolie by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid to buy a new TV. It's bad enough the cable company and Netflix know exactly what I am watching. Now the TV company does, too?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  14. Re:Just don't buy Smart TV's by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    This would require smart customers. Have you ever met one?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:Bring back the good old days by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Yet strangely the news were more informative and the programming was generally better...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. Re:Not that simple by rogoshen1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    mcafee is one of the worst violators of consumer privacy. their antivirus crap sends a whole metric ton of information back to the mother ship which is then sold to analytics firms for tracking consumer behavior.

    This move has next to nothing about actually using the software as an antivirus; it's entirely about harvesting that sweet sweet data.

  17. Putting the cart before the horse? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I can see the need for AV on general-purpose devices like computers where user input can be VERY difficult to predict and it's hard to keep users from screwing everything up by starting a program they shouldn't. But how in the world is this possible in a walled-off environment like a TV where you can literally ONLY run whatever the maker lets you?

    Samsung, if you have a security problem in your walled garden, YOU screwed up. Fix the problem instead of slapping a band-aid on it!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Putting the cart before the horse? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      It's because TV vendors make overly complicated Smart TVs to do anything. Sometimes they are essentially general purpose PCs hobbled to only show videos. This wouldn't be an issue if the manufacturer addressed security concerns, but then they don't supply updates because they've released a new model and would rather you buy that one. (Because everyone is going to by a new $500 TV every year, right?) So what you get is a computer inside your TV, connected to WiFi, and which doesn't get updates. It's a recipe for the TV to be hacked.

      Of course, the solution isn't to crap anti-virus tools into the TV. It's to actually secure the TV's computer properly or leave it out altogether, but they'd rather just take a payment from McAfee and toss in an AV.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  18. Yet another reason not to buy a Samsung TV by Casandro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean why should I pay for a TV from a company that sees me as its product?

  19. My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartTV? by williamyf · · Score: 2

    Yup. They Offer two tiers.

    A free antivirus provided by Synology based on ClamAV, and a paid one by McAfee. Both are optional to install. I installed the ClamAV one.

    After all, the Synology is, at its core, a Linux Box connected to the net, and therefore suceptible to viruses and worms. Granted, less susceptible than, let's say, a windows box, but susceptible nonetheless. So, an antivirus is a nice addition to the defense in depth*, multiple layers of defense, whathaveyou.

    The Samsung TV is, at its core, a box running a Linux/BSD core (Bada, which is what samsung uses, can use either) connected to the net, so it should use an Antivirus. Defense in depth, multiple layers of defense and all that...

    Having it Pre-Installed is a way to simplify things for less sophisticated users, and (sadly) monetize them post sale as well.

    Let alone the publicity for McAfee: my SmartTV uses McAfee antivirus, when time comes to chose an antivirus for my new PC/company/small business, may use McAfee as well (or so goes the thinking of the marketeers).

    JM2C

    * Some of the defenses for my Syno are, in no particular order:
    1.) Use 9.9.9.9 as the DNS of the Syno.
    2.) Activate the FW on the Ingress Router of NW.
    3.) Activate SW Firewall on the Syno itself.
    4.) Keep Syno Updated on Patches. Also patch syno packages.
    5.) Run AV on Syno.
    6.) Periodicaly run Security Advisor on Syno.
    7.) Disable SMB 1 on Syno.
    8.) Secure the WiFi network as much as possible.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  20. Oblig xkcd by Megahard · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  21. Re: Politicians love to call themselves "smart" by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Beats using stacks of AOL CDs

  22. Re:Just don't buy Smart TV's by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Economies of scale means that manufacturers don't want to make dumb TVs as a distinct product line. They were probably already being kickbacks from Netflix et. al. long before McAfee, so smart TVs are probably cheaper all around.

  23. Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AV on your NAS is not designed to protect the NAS itself, its designed to detect windows malware being put onto the storage device and thus spread to other windows clients that are accessing it.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  24. Re: Bring back the good old days by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The difference is that this was two incidences over a decade. Today you get that a magnitude larger before the evening news are even being invented.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Er ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    ... hopefully I don't actually have to break tradition and read the fine article.

    Isn't this a closed system? WTH would you need antivirus for? Poltergeists?

  26. Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It does protect against Linux malware too. It's a Linux box running an older kernel with numerous services exposed, and periodically exploits are found.

    For example, this flaw in Samba was pretty severe: https://nakedsecurity.sophos.c...

    Still not convinced that McAfee is the best solution, but a Linux based NAS is not immune to malware either.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  27. Re:Join!! by v1 · · Score: 1

    mod parent as spam

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  28. Re:It's a conglomerate, writer? by jimbo · · Score: 1

    The TV division, or whatever that bit is called, no doubt have their own budget and revenue goals. If things are not going well they'll come under scrutiny from the mothership.

    There is ofcourse cooperation across divisions to satisfy company goals, like correlating consumer TV habits with everything they know about people from Phones and Bigsby.

  29. Re:Just don't buy Smart TV's by jimbo · · Score: 1

    Yes, some CEO said recently that profit on hardware sales was around 7% he admitted it was their own fault but in any case it's now necessary to boost profit in other ways. Selling information about consumer TV habits is no 1 (gathered through internet connected Smart TVs), getting a few kickbacks is probably welcomed as well.

  30. useless by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Oh good lord, are they putting McAfee Security Scan Plus on their TVs? That thing doesn't do anything useful. It just natters at you and promotes their for-pay product. It's the first thing I uninstall.

    Is it *possible* to uninstall it from your TV?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  31. Tizen is Linux by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    With Linux basically running on all our TVs now, it seems very reasonable to consider AV on our embedded computers with large displays.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  32. Samsung should stick to hardware by maskedmoron · · Score: 1

    Samsung has always had terrible software. The fact that they're taking bribes to make it worse shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone. Any marginal hardware advantage Samsung has had over their competitors over the years has been rendered moot by the garbageware Samsung bundles. Still it's nice to see my opinion of Samsung validated once in a while.

  33. Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT by williamyf · · Score: 1

    You do know that ClamAV is intended to find Windows malware on Linux hosted email servers or samba shares? And that's it?

    Nope, It also checks the Syno partition looking for Linux viruses. As a matter of fact, the default check is to check only the system partion every day, as a full NAS check would take way too much time.

    Amyjojo already explained it.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  34. Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT by williamyf · · Score: 1

    Nope, It also checks the Syno partition looking for Linux viruses. As a matter of fact, the default check is to check only the system partion every day, as a full NAS check would take way too much time.

    Amyjojo already explained it.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  35. There are reasons for this by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

    I saw an article around a year ago - and I think it was on this site - claiming that the OS Samsung use for TVs was hopelessly insecure, and that whoever had written it simply did not have a clue about security. I believe that OS was Tizen, it was certainly something Samsung wrote themselves.
    Assuming the article was accurate, Samsung should have had a serious go at fixing it. That costs money. What we see here is something that raises the bar a little and is actually revenue-positive. Win win from Samsung's perspective.
    It is still an inadequate response on its own, hell - maybe they are trying to plug the holes as well.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
  36. Illegal under GDPR? by MS · · Score: 1

    So, if the purpose of the antivirus-software is gathering information to phone home, without the users knowledge (explicit and informed consent), those tvs would be illegal to be sold in the EU due to the GDPR (privacy laws).

  37. Why does McAfee pay? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Why does McAfee pay to have his antivirus installed? They would not do that without a plan to recover the cost and make money

    Are we ahead of another privacy scandal, with data sucked from smartTV by a rogue antivirus?

  38. what's next? by sad_ · · Score: 1

    nike putting mcafee on their shoes?!

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  39. Re:My Synology NAS has antivirus, why not a SmartT by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Ensuring the kernel and those services are patched and hardened would do far more good than running an av scan...
    Last i checked the state of linux av it couldnt pick up old stuff like lrk (linux rootkit) or the various variants like t0rnkit or modified versions of sshd etc... Also most linux rootkits tend to be manually installed rather than automatically spreading, so if someone semi competent compromises the host and installs a rootkit, they will also notice the scheduled scans and work out how to evade them.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!