Slashdot Mirror
YouTube Will Disable Comments on Nearly All Videos With Kids (variety.com)
YouTube said today it will disable the ability for viewers to leave comments on most videos featuring minors, as it tries to contain the damage from a scandal involving child predators leaving coded sexual comments on the site. From a report: YouTube said in a blog post Thursday that over the past week it had already disabled comments from "tens of millions of videos" that could be subject to predatory behavior. Now, it will expand that to suspend comments on virtually all videos featuring young minors, as well as videos featuring older kids that "could be at risk of attracting predatory behavior." In a tweet, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki linked to the update and explained the change: "Recently, there have been some deeply concerning incidents regarding child safety on YouTube. Nothing is more important to us than ensuring the safety of young people on the platform."
Was actually talking about the current "adpocalypse" and its causes, and wondered if youtube wouldn't be eventually working towards disabling comments. In fact, I'd go a step further and start phasing out comments in general. While they increase "engagement", they're so incredibly useless that I definitely wouldn't miss them. Leave chats for livestreams, though, as that actually provides instantaneous feedback that can be valuable.
This is the end of comments on the web as we know it.
As usual, a handful of assholes ruined something for everybody else.
#DeleteFacebook
Why stop there? YouTube comments are some of the worst on the internet. Disable them for all videos. Nothing of value will be lost.
In other news YouTube nuked its head office from orbit in order to deal with a mouse found in their cafeteria kitchen.
"Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
I thought I had seen some incredible feats of hysteria before, but this has to be a new high water mark. Because some comments *might* be left by perverts, we are just getting rid of them altogether? "Featuring minors" also is incredibly vague, would this include anything with child actors? What about reviews of something that featured child actors?
I feel like this is just going to push yet another chunk of the creator base to other platforms, if they exist. It might be time for Youtube to decide on the content it really wants on its platform and then build outward from there, as they have obviously moved (or been forced) away from just a general video sharing service.
What the hell is "bullshit"? Is there an actual bovine inside my screen taking a dump?
If you don't like YT, you technically don't have to use it.
http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
Are these "coded sexual comments" somehow secretly raping the servers or what? If they are coded you would expect that nobody outside of the know actually notices or cares. This seems to be a panic-reaction at best. Talk about throwing out the [censored] with the bathwater.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
And spectrum is quite an apt word when discussing these comments on a public message board. For technical videos though, like coding, comments are frequently useful. For tech/gadget reviews - also useful. Game review comments - getting less useful. Would be useful to have an aggregate score rather than hundreds of inane comments. Comedy clip comments - the worst! It's ironic that some of the most excruciatingly unfunny comments should follow a comedy clip but there you go.
>> Nothing is more important to us than
If the next world from a company isn't "profit" then the statement is probably a lie.
...not only because of your "regular" suspects.
But one of the major problems kids face today, is the endless onslaught of their peers who often will ridicule them, stalk them - too many times leading to possible suicide, because a kid can't handle snide comments as well as adults, will often hide this from their parents, and suffer in silence, shamed by their anonymous schoolmates and cyberbullies who also are kids, and don't quite understand how serious this is before suicide threats become real.
Personally, I think there should be an age-restriction on video uploads. And commenting should be something that could be in closed circuits only, like family and "approved" friends. Then it would be okay, much like a family album online with keys that only invited parties can get.
What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
I wish they would just make YouTube Kids not a useless dumpster filled with trash.
Yes, but only unneutered males.
You've seen the movie "Predator"? It's like that thing, except a child.
Are these "coded sexual comments" somehow secretly raping the servers or what? If they are coded you would expect that nobody outside of the know actually notices or cares. This seems to be a panic-reaction at best. Talk about throwing out the [censored] with the bathwater.
At least some people are of the opinion that the guy who set the ball rolling made most of this up, and basically this is mostly a panic in the grand tradition of such things as the Satanic Child Abuse Panic of a few decades ago...which people are still sorting out the legal fallout of, despite how debunked it is.
I'd honestly start pushing for YT to start at least considering demonetizing videos that get too heavy into whipping up histerias for views--possibly also disabling the view counts from displaying & the video from being able to use its view metrics to go viral, to discourage the people whose motive isn't ad view money but stroking their ego with view counts. Money and/or attention covers two out of three of what seem to be the major motives for setting off these kinds of dumpster fires. (The third is basically major mental health problems of the kind that tends to include paranoid delusions, and you can't ethically force them to take their meds but cutting off publicity will discourage some of them and certainly help keep down the harm.)
... all kid related? Even pewdiepie often features 9 year olds.
This happens around the same time that dissenter add-on for most popular browsers came out:
https://dissenter.com/
Should be interesting to see if it manages to become popular enough to replace website implementations for more than just the actual dissenters from mainstream if youtube et al start to clamp down on comment sections that hard.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
It seems to me that exaggerated fears about children and sex isn't a specifically SJW phenomenon but more of a generalized American phenomenon (seeping into the rest of the world now, since US culture is so influential).
The
"Won't someone think of the children!"
Guns, internet, Speech silencing excuses.
#FreedonToHear what you want us to hear, F Censors/excuses.
You be with the children when on internet, be a good parent.
Unlike Facebook, which is effectively mandatory in some circumstances.
Why is Snark Required?
Are they talking about EATING children?! What's with this fucking "predator" bullshit language?
Astonishingly, some words have more than the one literal meaning.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
If you don't like YT, you technically don't have to use it.
Sure I know I don't have to use it, but please show me the alternative that has about just half as many users. Anywhere?
The right to free speech is not the same thing as the right to the biggest available audience.
To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
yesterday's article about gab providing the ability to have comments for every page on the internet in mind, it doesn't matter anymore if your site allows comments or not. except ofcourse, that youtube can now wash their hands in denial as it's no longer their problem.
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
Wonder how long it'll take the pedos to move their discussions over to {...somewhere else...}
As long as that moving destination isn't hosted by Google, it's find by them: They can claim that they have done their side of the work to avoid becoming the home base of {...latest scarecrow..}, and get all the precious advertising money back.
Dealing with the backlash of having become a "discussion enabler" for {...latest scarecrow...} and potentially losing ad money revenue (if that's the way they finance themselves) is the destination platform's problem. Not youtubes.
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]