Slashdot Mirror


Actresses, Business Leaders, and Other Wealthy Parents Charged in Massive College Admissions Scandal (npr.org)

Federal prosecutors charged dozens of people on Tuesday in a major college admission scandal that involved wealthy parents, including Hollywood celebrities and prominent business leaders, paying bribes to get their children into elite American universities. From a report: Federal officials have charged dozens of well-heeled parents, including actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin, in what the Justice Department says was a multimillion-dollar scheme to cheat college admissions standards. The parents allegedly paid a consultant who then fabricated academic and athletic credentials and arranged bribes to help get their children into prestigious universities. "We're talking about deception and fraud -- fake test scores, fake credentials, fake photographs, bribed college officials," said Andrew Lelling, the U.S. attorney for the District of Massachusetts.

Lelling said 33 parents "paid enormous sums" to ensure their children got into schools such as Stanford and Yale, sending money to entities controlled by a man named William Rick Singer in return for falsifying records and obtaining false scores on important tests such as the SAT and ACT. Describing how Singer worked to present his clients' children as elite athletes, Lelling said, "In many instances, Singer helped parents take staged photographs of their children engaged in particular sports. Other times, Singer and his associates used stock photos that they pulled off the Internet -- sometimes Photoshopping the face of the child onto the picture of the athlete" and submitting it to desirable schools.

42 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Unacceptable by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What ever happened to getting your kid into college the good old fashioned way? Donating enough money to get a building named after you and guaranteed admission to any descendants.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Unacceptable by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least this has the benefit of providing others a place to learn. I have no problem giving some asshat kid a free admission if he is allowing 500 other people to get an education on his dime at the same time.

      The money isn't going to the schools. The parents are paying some middleman who is either paying SAT/ACT proctors to help cheat on exams, hire people to take the exams for them, or paying college coaches to designate the children as "recruits" who then get easier entry requirements or priority admission.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Unacceptable by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What ever happened to getting your kid into college the good old fashioned way? Donating enough money to get a building named after you and guaranteed admission to any descendants.

      According to TFA, most of these parents paid the consultant $250k to $450k. A donation that size is not going to get your kid admitted automatically. It would take millions.

      But the moral/ethical/legal difference is that those millions would go to the university to help fund its operations and scholarships, rather than into the pocket of some slimebag consultant.

    3. Re:Unacceptable by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is another important detail. Donating a building and getting special accommodation etc was an open secret. There was no "fraud" about it. Recall the issue with fraud is that the misinformation causes someone or some entity to act against their own interests. Legal definitions aside its about not eroding the trust in society. If I donate a few million to put up the "DarkOx Center for Information Science" with a nod and wink that DarkOx Jr will get accepted next year; the school has a choice they decide its worth accepting a possibly inferior candidate to get the building or they can refuse my donation.

      In this case though the schools were getting nothing the consultants were pocketing the money and the schools in a lot of cases were being mislead. They were given faked test scores, faked photos of athletic achievements, told the students in question were going to play this or that sport (usually used to raise the public image of the school) when they had no intention and maybe no ability to do so. So it was pure fraud. The institutions were arguably harmed here, and the sleazy consultants made off with the cash. Also some of the bribes were funneled thru fake charities as well for what appears to be tax evasion.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Unacceptable by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Donating a building and getting special accommodation etc was an open secret.

      At many schools it is not a secret. They are quite open about favoring donors. This makes sense, since the limit on a school's capacity is money, not the number of chairs in the classroom. So a donor pays for their own kid, while expanding opportunities for others. The cheaters did the opposite.

    5. Re:Unacceptable by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Give me $450K and I'll start my own business.

      Pfft. Spoken like a poor. The whole point of going to these places is so you can make well connected friends who give you cushy fake consulting jobs or finance your political campaign. Its to ensure a steady stream of other peoples money into their pockets into the future.

      Start a business, good grief businesses may fail and running a real one takes actual work.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    6. Re:Unacceptable by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Almost everybody at Harvard/Yale/Sanford gets a 4.0, the story is 'they're all that smart'...Bullshit all day long.

      When I was in grad school, I met a few fellow grad students who did their undergrad at those 'elite' sorts of universities. They were smart, no doubt, but no more so than the rest of us public state school people. They just had nicer clothes, cars, and more expensive hobbies.

      I hate that myth that the elite schools are for smarter people. They're for wealthier people's kids, so that when those kids become wealthy/inherit that wealth, the ruling class has some faux meritocratic justification for it's own position in society. And unfortunately, so many of us buy it hook, line, and sinker.

  2. Teaching those life lessons by Virtucon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It isn't what you know or how hard you work.
    It's who you know, how much payola you're willing to give them and how much leverage that buys you.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Teaching those life lessons by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, not exactly. These people were actually committing fraud by cheating on tests and bribing officials.

      Take Jared Kushner; he was admitted to Harvard after his father pledged 2.5 million dollars in donations. But that's not so bad. Sure, it means he probably displaced a more academically qualified candidate. But *the practice* of preferential treatment of big donors has allowed Harvard to amass wealth the enables it to offer poorer but gifted students a leg up they wouldn't have been able to afford. Harvard waves tuition for students whose families make less than $65K, and allows families making between 65k and 150k to pay on a sliding scale from 0 to 10% of their income.

      The people who were named for cheating displaced more qualified students too, but they contributed *nothing* to the system in return.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Teaching those life lessons by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. Hiring someone from Harvard is hiring someone gifted OR connected OR rich or some combination. It's not bad to walk into any interview having the interviewer believe at least one of those is true.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. The Rich by djbckr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Note that Trump's budget released yesterday calls for a cut in education funding. This affects the working class. The rich can afford private schools. The masses get dumber, the rich get more powerful. When will it end?

    1. Re:The Rich by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that Trump's budget released yesterday calls for a cut in education funding. This affects the working class.

      It's the faucet-like availability of government-backed loans and too-easy education money that is directly responsible for driving tuition prices through the roof in the first place. The "working class" can learn remedial algebra and gain the ability to write a complete English sentence finally taught to them at a very reasonably priced local community college just as easily as the rich kid can get it taught to her at an elite school her parents can afford. "The masses" are dumber because the culture is rotting, not because community colleges and state schools are inherently less able to teach critical thinking skills than is a college with $20k/year dorm rooms and a gluten-free menu in every sorority kitchen.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:The Rich by LostMyAccount · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is exactly right. Tuition increases and loan increases are totally a feedback mechanism. As soon as tuition goes up, loan amounts go up to match. As soon as more money is available, schools increase tuition.

      The slop gets used as exactly as you describe -- what were once totally acceptable "dorm rooms" now need to be 2 bedroom condos. It would not surprise me at all if there were "dorms" on college campuses touting their in-room hot tubs.

    3. Re:The Rich by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that Trump's budget released yesterday calls for a cut in education funding.

      Hmm, 12% of about $85B (Federal budget for education) cuts is about $$10.5B. Total spending on education at all levels is around $670B. SO, you're really worried about that 1.5% cut?

      Especially given that Federal education dollars mostly fund the Department of Education, not, you know, actual education....

      Yes, almost all education spending (nearly 90%) is done at State and Local levels. And the higher level of spending (with local at the bottom, then State, then Federal) you get, the more likely that the dollars so spent are spent on bureaucrats, rather than, you know, teachers....

      Do note that what this is about is people cheating to get their kids into prestigious schools (suitable for the upper crust only - the riff-raff need not apply). If they really want to throw money away buying their way into the "upper crust" schools, let them go to town! It's not like someone going to college on a football scholarship isn't already dragging the system down a bit every year....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    4. Re:The Rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is exactly wrong. Reductions in per capita spending on higher education are responsible for increased tuition.

      https://www.educationnext.org/higher-ed-lower-spending-as-states-cut-back-where-has-money-gone/

  4. I'm not surprised by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am, however, disappointed. Angry, even. Irrationally so.

    All my life I was taught to be good. To not steal, not cheat, to not lie. I live my life like that. I stay out of the way. I don't steal, I try not to cheat (my little cheats are leaving a tiny bit earlier, to get a jump on the other commuters, I have a heavy right foot so I tend to take off from lights like a scalded cat and go around corners like a cat on carpet, etc.) I have lied, and I feel bloody awful when I do. I have done bad things, and I feel truly awful.

    These people don't, I guess? They just take what they want.

    I always suspected that the cheaters are the ones that truly get ahead. The ones who make the big bank. (BIG bank, not get-by-and-put-some-away-for-a-rainy-day bank). They can't do it without cheating.

    This just confirms it in a way that's visceral, palpable.

    Think on that next time you see that what's driving that Ferrari 458 next to you is a bleached, tanned, perfect specimen and you, who has yearned for a prancing pony since childhood will likely never have one.. and if you do, it'll be a 50-year old 308. (Nothing wrong with that, but I hope you see my point. We have to earn it, they just walk in and buy one. The one who earned it will savor every tick of the valvetrain, every rrrp of the exhaust.. they who walked in and bought it will probably spill their latte all over the leather and worse, far worse.)

    Once, I was leaving work, 2 jobs ago.. the wife of the CEO drove a RR Wraith, a car I'd love to just even look after, never you mind drive.. she cut to the right of all of us waiting on the left-turn light, dragged that beautiful yacht of a car all over wet concrete mud and slurry, then gunned it and went into traffic on a red light. And she gets away with it. Cunt. Her husband was no better, he drove a RR Phantom and was unable to park it without a 20-point turn.

    Fuck the rich. I really do hope karma is a thing. Imagine being reincarnated from rich asshole to possum?

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:I'm not surprised by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah but, they're going to jail, and you're not.

      They'll go to a country club prison, serve minimal time, and be out before the kid graduates.

      Only the poor do Hard Time.

      This won't change until the Rich also do Hard Time, and lots and lots of it.

      Manafort much? I wish they'd given him 25, not 4. If I did that, I'd be in the clink for a long, long time, because I don't have his connections.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  5. Re:This is news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's news when somebody does something about it.

    It won't be news when Andrew Lelling's career ends.

    He will be made an example of. 3, 2, 1...

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Whew, that was close! by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was about to pay several million dollars to pass my son off as the world's greatest collegiate hockey prospect (except he can't skate and is in his 40s) when I saw this Slashdot article. Now I've done something even better: I signed him up at the University Of American Samoa for a law degree! Go Land Crabs!

    Thanks Slashdot!

    --
    I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
  7. Re:This is news? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's the news thing here? I thought it was well known that connected people got their children in to "elite" educational institutions by donating a new library or something.

    I guess the news is that they tried to avoid giving the college the money and instead tried to come up with a valid excuse reasons why their children might be accepted. But it seems like the crime is less bribing people to get into "elite" institutions and instead bribing the WRONG people.

    I think the problem is these people simply are not wealthy enough for their kids to be accepted on that basis alone.

  8. Re:Madoff Redux by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Similarly, the salesperson here probably said something like, "I can get your kid into X University for Y grand. But I can't reveal our proprietary methods."

    One person paid $6.5 million. They had to known it was a shady deal. $6.5 million would pay for a team of full time tutors to follow the student around all day for 4 years.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  9. Re:This is news? by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A bunch of specific people getting named, shamed, and arrested definitely makes it news instead of just something that people know happens.

    They didn't bribe the "wrong" people, they bribed the "right" people who really did have the connections. Most of the people arrested already did it, successfully, before authorities busted the company selling the service.

    It isn't like they accidentally hired a front company for the FBI.

  10. Re:Madoff Redux by Aighearach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, when they ask you to make up a fake disability for your child to have so they need extra time on the test, you do know something about what is being done. When you also have to make up a fake family event so that they can take their entrance exams in some specific facility, instead of their one close to you or at the school you're applying to, then you do know something fraudulent is happening.

    And when you pay $500k for the above services, you really know a lot more about the service. Actual test prep doesn't involve lying to the school, and it doesn't cost $500k.

    Or, if you pay $2.5M for your student to get listed as being on an athletic scholarship, you probably already know what college sports are, if your child is really on the team, and if they've dedicated enough of their life for that to make sense. If it involves photoshopping a picture of their face onto the body of an athlete, you obviously already know the sport isn't a big enough part of their life to be earning a scholarship.

    I'm having trouble finding any accusations here where they might have thought it was something else. Plus, I mean, they got them talking about it on tape before making arrests; if there were innocent rubes who didn't know, they probably didn't even get charged.

  11. Re:Go Fake Athlete, GO! by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Singer helped parents take staged photographs of their children engaged in particular sports...sometimes Photoshopping the face of the child onto the picture of the athlete" and submitting it to desirable schools.

    I can't believe parents were actually this stupid. If you're playing sports at the collegiate level, it's because you're actually fucking good at it. The world knows this.

    Exactly how long did stupid celebrities think they were going to get away with pimping their fake elite athletes?

    I wish this would have all blown up on a playing field somewhere. Would have made for great social media watching some spoiled little shit get called out and shown the door for going along with their parents idiotic ideas.

    The coaches were in on it. The kids weren't actually getting recruited by the team, but the coach said the were to get them preferential admission.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  12. Re:This is news? by XXongo · · Score: 5, Informative

    What's the news thing here? I thought it was well known that connected people got their children in to "elite" educational institutions by donating a new library or something.

    It's news when somebody does something about it.

    It's news because they weren't doing that; they were literally cheating: forging fake documents, fake test scores, fake athletic achievements.

  13. Re:This is news? by Headw1nd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is pretty much it. What we are seeing here is the 1% trying to scam their way in because they can't drop $10M+ like the 0.01% can. Unfortunately for them, nobody is amused, not the Universities, not the Elites, and certainly not the middle-class (or lower) who were counting on these spots being up for fair competition. As others have pointed out, one dumb rich kid's endowment can fund the education of dozens of talented students, but these bribes help nobody but the people they went to.

  14. Re:Hasn't anyone ever heard of a "Legacy"? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without a strong economy backed by college educated kids you're not gonna get the return on investment you need.

    Yeah, the economy is really going to suffer if Muffy can't afford her gender studies degree.

    I don't think the ROI on this is quite as clear cut as you might think.

  15. Re: Teachable moment for fraudsters. by XXongo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can you find any Republicans in the group arrested today? Nope. All card-carrying Leftists.

    Since the summary didn't list any names except the photogenic actresses, I'm not sure how you know if they were Republicans or Democrats. The actual article names names (scroll down to the bottom for the list), and they're mostly athletic coaches and rich businessmen. I don't know their politics, but in my experience, athletic coaches and rich businessmen both tend toward the right.

  16. Re:This is news? by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The primary reason 'elite' universities exist is to enable the wealthy to convert wealth into prestigious credentials. I'm always baffled that anyone thinks otherwise when it is so clearly and obviously the case. Yes, they let in a few token poor people for free, but their primary means of selection overwhelmingly favor the wealthy and connected.

    The big lie they tell us is that getting in is a sign of merit, and using the connections facilitated by those universities to jump start your career also means you earned what you got. They market themselves as the apex of progressive enlightened intellectualism, but in reality, they act as the regulators of institutionalized classism and elitism. The issue in this case isn't that these people cheated. It is that they cheated the wrong way. There will be some faux outrage, then back to business as usual.

    Oh, and this doozy of a quote from TFA:

    "There will not be a separate admissions system for the wealthy," he added. "And there will not be a separate criminal justice system either."

    Legacy admissions begs to differ. What a joke. How could anyone say that with a straight face?

  17. A million or more [Re:Unacceptable] by XXongo · · Score: 3, Informative

    What ever happened to getting your kid into college the good old fashioned way? Donating enough money to get a building named after you and guaranteed admission to any descendants.

    According to TFA, most of these parents paid the consultant $250k to $450k.
    ...

    Read the actual article. The people accepting the bribes got maybe 350 K to 450K. The people arranging the bribes got a lot more.

    Exempli gratia:
    "In another example, Lelling said former Yale women's soccer coach Rudy Meredith took $400,000 to designate a potential student as a recruit for the team — boosting the student's admission prospects — despite knowing that the student didn't play the sport competitively.Once the student was accepted to Yale, her relatives paid Singer approximately $1.2 million, including a $900,000 to one of KWF's charitable accounts, according to court documents."

  18. Re: Teachable moment for fraudsters. by mcl630 · · Score: 4, Informative

    2 out of 50 were "Hollywood elites".

  19. Re:Go Fake Athlete, GO! by XXongo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... If you're playing sports at the collegiate level, it's because you're actually fucking good at it. The world knows this. Exactly how long did stupid celebrities think they were going to get away with pimping their fake elite athletes?

    The coaches were in on it. The kids weren't actually getting recruited by the team, but the coach said the were to get them preferential admission.

    Exactly. They weren't getting athletic scholarships, they were just getting an endorsement from the head coach that they were "prospects" for the team. That bumps them up the admission scale.

    Once they're admitted, they don't have to join the team. Nobody will even know that they were labelled a prospect; that's all in the confidential admissions paperwork.

  20. Re:This is news? by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exactly. The problem isn't that they cheated. Cheating is both acceptable and expected to the point it is ingrained into the elite admissions system. The problem is that this particular group cheated the wrong way. They cheaped out on their cheating, and in the world of wealth and privilege, that's the real problem.

  21. Re: Teachable moment for fraudsters. by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Funny

    And yes, the vast majority of today's wealthy are in fact leftist.

    HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!! Oh man, that was a good one.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  22. Re:This is news? by Talderas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's a good summary and then the icing on top is that the bribes were done as charitable contributions. Not only did they attempt bribery they were defrauding the United States and state governments of tax revenues.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  23. Re:Teachable moment for fraudsters. by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 4, Informative

    Robert Zangrillo is a republican https://voterrecords.com/voter... (I only googled the one as that's all I need to prove you wrong, try again).

  24. Re:This is news? by jcr · · Score: 4, Funny

    they were simply Ayn Rand followers

    Oh yeah, Hollywood is full of Objectivists. Totally.

    Putz.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  25. Re:This is news? by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How could anyone say that with a straight face?

    They're professionals.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  26. Re:This is news? by HornWumpus · · Score: 3

    Getting the same GPA as Al Gore.

    Straight 'gentleman's Bs' for both, no math or science to speak of for eather.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  27. Proof you're paying for access by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I graduated over 20 years ago from a state school. My parents weren't wealthy enough to buy my way into an Ivy League school. I turned out OK, but the fact is that my path could have been a whole lot easier if I had been able to even think about applying to places like this. Once you make it in, that club will never let you fail...the hard part is making it in.

    People wonder why these places are $60K+ a year, and accept less than 5% of applicants. It's because getting into one of these schools is a one-way ticket to Easy Street. You get to hobnob with the rich and powerful, they might fund your business ideas, and if you're not an entrepreneur there's a whole class of high-paying jobs open to you too. I live near NYC and investment banks recruit exclusively from the Ivy League for their most prestigious associate positions. My kids are smart but they're not full-scholarship-to-Harvard smart, or athletic enough for a sports scholarship, and I can't pay millions to an admissions broker...so they'll have to suck it up and find a job like the rest of us do instead of having it handed to them.

    I always thought wealthy parents just paid millions directly to the school to help build a building in order to secure admissions spots. Is it now so competitive that they have to go to a middleman with connections, and donations aren't enough? It's too bad...these rich parents' kids are taking spots that could otherwise go to someone who would actually use the education for something other than a stepping stone to McKinsey and Company and executive boards.

  28. Re:This is news? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 4, Funny

    The drunk fool George W Bush attended both Yale and Harvard, proving your point.

    Pfff. Those were my safety schools. I guess his dad didn't have enough juice to get him into Wharton.

  29. Mod Parent Up by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    see here for more.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/