Slashdot Mirror


Huawei Says It Has a Backup OS In Case It's Cut Off From Android (engadget.com)

Huawei has built its own operating system for phones, tablets and computers in case tensions between Huawei and the U.S. escalate even further than they already are. "The OS has been rumored for years, but Huawei confirmed its viability with the South China Morning Post, saying it could be used if the company were cut off from Android or Windows," reports Engadget. "It's seen as a last resort, but given the current discord between the U.S. and Huawei, it's not entirely surprising that the company has a plan B." From the report: Huawei began building the OS in 2012, after the U.S. banned Chinese telecom equipment maker ZTE from using American products and services. This was reportedly seen as a way to prepare for "worst-case scenarios." Now, with Huawei suing the U.S. government and the U.S. saying it might punish Germany if the country works with Huawei on its 5G networks, those worst-case scenarios might not be too far-fetched. At the moment, this doesn't change much. Android and Windows are still the company's first-choice. "We fully support our partners' operating systems -- we love them and our customers love them," a company spokesperson told South China Morning Post. Still, given the state of the U.S.-Huawei relationship, this contingency plan could be significant.

42 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Copyright? What Copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Probably a copy of Android.....

  2. Huawei Says It Has a Backup OS In Case It's Cut Of by anthonyconstantinou · · Score: 1

    Great news for Huawei lovers

  3. Re:Copyright? What Copyright? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since Google is blocked in China all Chinese Android users already have their own alternative versions, e.g. their own app stores and search services to replace the missing ones. Huawei is no exception so all they need to do is have a plan to continue core OS development on their own, rather than starting from scratch.

    That would make sense, given that Android is open source and there are lots of apps for it.

    A few western companies have already done the same thing, e.g. with compatibility layers for running Android apps on other operating systems.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Re:Copyright? What Copyright? by xeoron · · Score: 1

    It might be Tizen OS.

  5. Permissive License by DrYak · · Score: 4, Informative

    The base OS itself, i.e. AOSP, is licensed under a permissive license (Apache 2.0)

    Huawei (just like anybody else - e.g. Amazon's Fire and free/libre projects like LineageOS, also compatibility layers like Andbox) can freely copy Android all they like and nobody is every going to tell them anything.

    The problem isn't the base OS. It's the giant blob for service that Google only provides to licensed partner: the Google Play Services.
    That one might be required by some apps: that includes some mapping apps relying on the Google Maps Service (e.g.: some car sharing applications) and that include Google Play Store it-self.

    A chinese manufacturer can slap android on their phone, but the users won't have access to the usual Play Store and won't be able to install some application. That's why they usually provide teir own eco-system of apps. (Just like Amazon had their own application store).
    Even more so because Google is banned in China anyway.

    If you WANT to install those apps, you'd need to:
    - Pirate the google service (lots of cheap chinese phone manufacturer to that).
    - Install google services legally (as an end user, you can ask for a free license under some circumstance)
    ( ^- You know, Google would be happy at the opportunity to siphon your data anyway, so they are not against the idea of end-users installing it after-market. They are only against manufacturer not providing the exact "Google Experience" that they want - i.e.: try to get users hooked on Google Apps).
    - Install an open-source re-implementation of these services such as MicroG
    ( ^- And these one are much more configurable and can leak a lot less personnal data than the real google deal. Your smartphone's battery will appreciate not needing to ping back the mother ship every 30 seconds).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Permissive License by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This has been long done with in China, as google play services have been overwhelmingly blocked there on their Great Firewall. By far the most popular OS on Chinese phones is android. Without google play.

      The train you're complaining about being on the station left the station many years ago. Chinese android variants have long done away with any google play dependencies, and their customers largely don't care about google play in any way, as Tencent et al have long developed alternatives for everything and more.

    2. Re:Permissive License by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the base OS. It's the giant blob for service that Google only provides to licensed partner: the Google Play Services.

      I guess they really do have to ‘Pay to Play’

      ba-dump-dump-ching!
      Thanks folks, I’ll be here all week.

    3. Re:Permissive License by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm wondering whether we will eventually get a trustworthy western corporation with their own version of Android that doesn't snoop so much. I have an old Android phone that my kid uses and that thing lasts almost a week on a single charge of the 1800 mAh battery. We opted not to sign in to a Google account when configuring the device and disabled mobile internet. I imagine you could probably have a phone that ran quite a bit longer if you were willing to put up with some minor inconveniences like only polling for new mail periodically.

      I really don't need that much stuff from Google Play at this point and could probably go completely Google free by replacing most of what I do on my phone with open source alternatives. My needs are pretty basic, and could probably be filled by having a good browser like (Firefox perhaps) and simple email, messaging, and phone tools

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Permissive License by houghi · · Score: 1

      I just looked through my apps and the only one I sometimes use is google maps. The reason I sometimes use it is also the reason I still use it.

      Most open maps I would need to download and I do not use it often enough to wanting to do that. I also did not really bother to look for an alternative.

      I would love to have a no-google-apps phone. Just a store I can download apps I actually want. If possible one where things are actually free and not 10.000 of the same game with different names and all with a shitload of ads.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  6. Go ahead by qbast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " Now, with Huawei suing the U.S. government and the U.S. saying it might punish Germany if the country works with Huawei on its 5G networks, those worst-case scenarios might not be too far-fetched." Punish away, but retaliation will come from 27 countries.

    1. Re:Go ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The U.S. & U.K. have been proved to spy on their allies (echelon).
      They even sell to their own companies the info... to pay back the system.

      When some people come on MY HOME & steal MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY , I call them " THIEVES"

      When one of theses allies try to build a wall around it's property, the thieves cry...

    2. Re: Go ahead by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Nor are the Chinese, though.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Go ahead by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is more that time that Europe start to understand that the US are not ally

      It's not that Europe does not understand that the US is a sucky ally (and unusually so at the moment), it's that they understand that being the ally of Russia and China is way worse.

    4. Re:Go ahead by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Lol you all are deep on the us tech industries cock. Same with china, their alt is just more android.

    5. Re:Go ahead by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Leave echelon aside for a minute. Spanish police are saying that the CIA was involved in an assault in February where they took everyone in the North Korean embassy in Madrid prisoner, interrogated them for two hours, and then stole documents, computers, and two cars.

    6. Re:Go ahead by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Why is the US still in NATO? The narrative I heard is we pay a ruinous cost for their defense and so they can afford comfortable welfare states, and in return we get agreement to our policy proposals. This already sounds like a bad deal. But, we aren't even getting that. The NATO "allies" are openly defiant and won't fall in line. Don't say this started with Trump, either, because it didn't.

      USA out of NATO!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Go ahead by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Spanish police are saying that the CIA was involved in an assault in February where they took everyone in the North Korean embassy in Madrid prisoner, interrogated them for two hours, and then stole documents, computers, and two cars.

      It's interesting that Spanish police are saying that, but have they presented any, well, evidence that what they're saying is true?

      I notice that according to the BBC, Spanish police have not answered their queries for information....

      IMHO, the lack of a formal complaint by the alleged victims of this assault suggest something other than "the EEEEVIL USA did bad things to us!!!", since the NK's would like nothing better than to make us look like the bad guys....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:Go ahead by Kjella · · Score: 1

      It's not that Europe does not understand that the US is a sucky ally (and unusually so at the moment), it's that they understand that being the ally of Russia and China is way worse.

      We'd never align with them, the question is how badly the US is needed. The Soviet Union dissolved 28 years ago, Russia is the 10th biggest economy in the world behind Italy and their sphere of influence is now pretty much Belarus with the Baltic countries and Ukraine turning towards the west. Despite their meddling in Crimea and East Ukraine they've never been in less of a position to launch a major offensive against Europe. In fact we've built down our military to de-escalate with Russia despite the EU having 3.5x the population and 9x the GDP.

      With Trump's NATO funding rally we'll be returning to a more natural strength military - apart from the nukes, considerably stronger than Russia. For Europe this is becoming less and less about our domestic security, it's all about US vs China. That's a country in East Asia, thousands of miles from any border in Europe. Yes, we have the NATO pact as a last resort if WW3 breaks loose but that's also it. And in this world war maybe the US will need us as much as we will need them.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Go ahead by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      How stupid. US has become a selfish hegemon since the II WW.

      ... and China is a corrupt autocratic plutocracy while Russia is a mafia state. However hegemonic the US becomes, we can handle them and we can. reason with them, China wants to be what it was during the time of the Tang dynasty and Russia ... Russia is a type of kleptocracy that has no parallels in human history except perhaps the Roman Republic during it's descent into utter corruption and debauchery during the Jugurthine wars, except Russia has nowhere like the raw power Rome had even at that time and in such a humiliating state.

  7. Re:Copyright? What Copyright? by Freischutz · · Score: 2

    Probably a copy of Android.....

    In the FOSS community it's called forking, it's done all the time and there is nothing wrong with it. In fact Android uses the Linux kernel under the hood so in that sense the Android core systems themselves are a fork (a.k.a. 'copy') of Linux.

  8. GNU/Linux hopes by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I was also hoping for some variation of GNU/Linux.

    Either TizenOS as you mention.
    Or something Mer project based (descendant of Meamo/Meego, currently used as a base in Jolla's SailfishOS (*)).
    Or something else running on the libhybris (what Jolla developped to run *GNU*/Linux on Android Linux kernels and blob drivers) like UB Ports' Ubuntu Touch.
    Or writing GNU/Linux compatible drivers from the ground up and "licensing" (well it's GPL so it's free) Purism' OS of the Librem 5 smartphone.
    Or one of the lighter solution like Firefox OS / Boot-to-Gecko / KaiOS (or whatever it is called now) though I doubt it because currently KaiOS seems to be targeting feature phones.
    etc.

    Granted, the actual product from Huawei is going to have an ugly interface customization (and probably filled to the brim with their own spywares instead of Google's), but that means more cheap platforms were it is easy to get a GNU/Linux os running (i.e.: that are less targetted toward pure Android-only)

    ---

    (*): A local customisation of Jolla's Sailfish OS is also an entirely realistic possibility. Jolla Oy. has courted a lot of B2B and B2G contracts (including in Russia where they are providing OS for some large scale enterprise solution) so Huawei might have licensed something from them.

    They also since recently have their own in-house developped Android compatibility layer (they licensed and took over some of the necessary bits from Myriad's Alien-Dalvik) that now runs in containers and can host AOSP 8.0/8.1 Oreo, so at least an out-of-the-box solution for the apps that don't desperately rely on Google Play Service blobs.
    (And compatible with 3rd-party microG and after-market opengapps, so even possibilities to get Google-dependant app running if you're ready to muck with your phone)

    This means that they won't be 100% cut of from the dominat app eco-system and can still remain relevant until whatever they have takes off as a viable app platform.

    Purism was also reported to think about porting Andbox among their stretch goals for achieving similar goals.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  9. Not a huge surprise... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    For the Chinese market do you really need anything being AOSP, a skin that tries to look like iOS; and WeChat support? Maybe an in-app payment system for pay to win mobile games?

    1. Re:Not a huge surprise... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      They have all the same kinds of services that Android offers. App store, AV protection, cloud sync, voice assistant, account and payment management for families, OTA updates etc.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Not a huge surprise... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      all running on android.

    3. Re:Not a huge surprise... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      For the Chinese market do you really need anything being AOSP

      Google could conceivably stop doing Android themselves, and then there will be no AOSP either. Given Google's propensity for canceling projects that people are using, they have to have a backup plan anyway. Granted, it could be "Fork AOSP".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re:who ? by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    US worked on the Sino-Soviet split https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    China was rewarded with US investment and advanced tech.
    Taiwan the real China no longer had as much US support.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Whataboutism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The us and UK are bad, no doubt about it. But neither is anywhere close to the dystopian state that China is. Most of the idiots bringing up western problems when discussing China are either paid Chinese propaganda spreaders or people who have never been to China and have no idea how bad it is.

    I was there for only a week, and even I could sense the level of dystopia there. Cameras everywhere, ID required for almost everything (buying train tickets, SIM card, Hotel, etc. ) and of course the censorship online and in the media. Signs everywhere talking about how China has rule of law and democracy. And just the general ignorance of the population, I speak Chinese and never once did I hear anyone discussing anything of importance. All they talked about was personal lives and celebrities. I know politics is forbidden, but I never heard any discussion of science, technology, society, theories of any sort, or even talking about things they learned (other than school children cramming for exams).

    In summary, China really is as bad as it's made out to be in the media in the west, and arguably worse. If they become the world power and push their society on the rest of us, humanity is doomed.

  12. Re:who ? by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 2

    Capitalist enterprises from the West invested in China, and were welcomed there by Mr. Deng Xiaoping and his followers.

  13. Re:Huawei Says It Has a Backup OS In Case It's Cut by e3m4n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I was an authoritarian regime looking for a cover story to replace everyones software on their device with something I could control in greatee detail, this would be a good one. In fact why not just roll that social media credit system into the payment apps as well. Surcharges for lower social credit scores, etc. Best of all we made it look like someone elses fault so our people flock to this change.

  14. Re:Copyright? What Copyright? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    No, Palm OS.

  15. Hmm + 100's of millions of apps I'm sure by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

    OS is not the problem.
    Developers with apps to make the device functional is the problem.
    Rock and a hard place really...... so seems like fluff and nonsense from Huawei really.

  16. Re:Copyright? What Copyright? by charles05663 · · Score: 1

    I think they call it Hema-roid.

  17. Man I hate how "OS" has been diluted. by shess · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've been working so hard on our own OS! It's Android, but with a skin and without a few apps!

    A new Linux OS is out! It's Ubuntu, with a different terminal emulator!

    We wrote 10,000 lines of code, added it to the existing 15 million lines of code, and now we have something new! We're relevant and important!

    In reality, this just makes them on par with a precocious 8th grader.

    1. Re:Man I hate how "OS" has been diluted. by houghi · · Score: 1

      If they remove a few apps (Most likely Facebook and Google) I would love to have that. It is a step forward.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Man I hate how "OS" has been diluted. by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point. But what do you consider the OS? The kernel, the kernel + boot environment, the kernel + boot environment + basic services?
      I think a majority of what we see and consider a new "OS" is the desktop environment plus some changes under the hood that a majority of the people would never know about.

  18. Android hosted on Linux, *not* a fork by drnb · · Score: 1

    Probably a copy of Android.....

    Anyone and his dog are allowed to copy the base Android OS --- as Android is a fork of Linux anyway.

    Android is *not* a fork of Linux. Android is effectively its own OS. It is merely hosted on Linux. The vast majority of Android devs and nearly all Android users see nothing of Linux, no more than someone using some other appliance that has a Linux kernel in the background.

    1. Re: Android hosted on Linux, *not* a fork by drnb · · Score: 1

      Thats dumb youre claiming that linux function as a hypervisor in Android ? Operating system abstracts things such as file persistence you dont have to know the SATA commands etc to write raw blocks. This is all done by linux, not dalwik. think of android as WIN95 ontop of dos6 a UI layer ontop of the underlying operating system.

      "Hosting" covers quite a bit more than VM type situations. Operating systems hide hardware details from application programmers, and application programmers under Android see neither hardware details nor Linux implementation details/abstractions. They don't see Linux at all, its hidden just like the hardware. From the app developer's perspective Android is the operating system. The Linux kernel could be replaced with the old BSD kernel or Google's new Linux kernel replacement Fuscia and the Android developer would neither know nor care.

      Yes, think of your analogy. Linux is the MS-DOS that the Win32 developer neither sees nor cares about. To the Win32 developer Win9x is the operating system and when they run their app on WinNT where DOS is replaced with NT kernel and drivers they neither know nor care.

  19. More likely in case Google drops censorship tools by drnb · · Score: 1

    Huawei Says It Has a Backup OS In Case It's Cut Off From Android

    More likely in case Google actually stops developing the censorship / monitoring versions of their software for China.

  20. Re: And what if they're cut off from Linux? by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

    "...Chinese are quietly snipping transcontinental fiber optic cables ..."

    Citation?

  21. That would be confused with an open source project by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Call it replican,

    That would be confused with the Replicant open-source no-proprietary-blobs android project.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  22. Less google snooping by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering whether we will eventually get a trustworthy western corporation with their own version of Android that doesn't snoop so much. I have an old Android phone that my kid uses and that thing lasts almost a week on a single charge of the 1800 mAh battery.

    If you specifically require *Android* :

    - using the opensource LineageOS
    - and using either F-Droid (specifically for opensource software) or/and Aptoide (multiple 3rd party repositories) to obtain 3rd party apps.
    - and optionnally installing MicroG as an alternative implementation if any of your must-have apps requires a library that is normally provided by Google (And optionnally
    (- and optionnally Yalp store if you desperately need apps from Play store).

    this are the ways to proceed to obtain an Android that doesn't snoop too much.

    If you aren't married to Android specifically:

      - look at the upcoming Librem 5 by Purism. It's exactly designed with the intent of "a phone that doesn't snoop too much on the kids", being built from the ground up for that (with physical kill-switched to block the separate USB-connected modem, etc.)

    - or, if you want something that you can install today, look at Sailfish OS, a full blown GNU/Linux by the guys who used to work on Maemo/Meego at Nokia (before the whole Elop+Microsoft fiasco), which is installable on select few devices (Jolla sells licensed version to install on a couple of Sony devices. In the forum you can find community made opensource version for other phone)
    ( ^- I use that, on Sony Xperia smartphones)

    - or check Ubuntu Touch, nowadays handled by UBPort now that Cannonical has dropped the ball.

    Note that is you have a couple of android apps that you need, the commercial version of Sailfish offers an app compatibility layer (and refer to MicroG above and in the forum if your apps insist on Google libraries).

    and Purism is considering making an app compatibility layer too (again, use MicroG for apps that require Google libraries).

    For *maps* specifically, check out "OSM Scout Server" (installing your own local open-street map server on your phone) and "Pure Maps" (a nice non-google map application that can optionnally fetch maps from OSM Scout Server).
    The devs are currently making Sailfish OS version, and they plan to release Librem versions too once that phone hits the market.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  23. Alternative by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Sepcifically for the maps on android, OSMAnd is an openstreetmap-powered solution that can also run offline.

    For the rest of the de-googled smartphone see my other post above, with both solutions for no-google-apps phone and completely no-android phones.
    (I personnally do the latter, running Sailfish OS on Sony Xperia)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]