Slashdot Mirror


Apple TV+, With Shows From Spielberg, Oprah and J.J. Abrams, is Coming This Fall (cnet.com)

Alongside its new news and payment services, Apple today also unveiled Apple TV+, a place for its new slate of original shows. The new service, billed as a place for the "highest-quality storytelling," will be available in over 100 countries and released starting this fall through the Apple TV app. From a report: It will be ad-free, on-demand and available both streaming online and downloadable. Pricing will be announced this fall. Apple TV Plus is the company's way of jumping into the streaming video game, where Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu and others have already established themselves and brought in millions of cord-cutter customers fleeing cable subscriptions. The new service also works as a way for Apple to grow its thriving services business, helping it continue to grow despite lagging iPhone sales.

The company in 2017 hired Jamie Erlicht and Zack Van Amburg from Sony Pictures Television to oversee "all aspects of video programming." The two were responsible for shows such as Breaking Bad, The Crown and Rescue Me. And in the past year, Apple has continually announced original content it's producing -- including a multiyear partnership deal with Oprah and deals with Reese Witherspoon, J.J. Abrams and dozens of others. The company has reportedly gone well past its original $1 billion budget to bring in this list of movie and television A-listers, who are slated to create about 30 shows and a handful of movies.

101 comments

  1. Blogspam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the third article on Apple in the past day, how much Apple news do we really need?

    1. Re:Blogspam by couchslug · · Score: 1

      As much as possible since msmashdot isn't news for nerds.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Blogspam by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      > how much Apple news do we really need?

      As much as Apple tells you that you are supposed to want.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    3. Re:Blogspam by butchersong · · Score: 1

      An apple event occurs a few times a year. It doesn't seem unreasonable to cover the topics in their announcements.

    4. Re:Blogspam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In separate posts for each one? How about one post?

    5. Re:Blogspam by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In separate posts for each one? How about one post?

      Has Slashdot ever managed to do only one post about a subject?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Will it be locked to Apple hardware? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    Because I don't see it going anywhere if it does. I can put Netflix, Amazon Video, Hulu, and a dozen other paid and free streaming services on my Roku, and my understanding is that the Amazon stick and the Chromecast are mostly similar.

    I'm not buying another box just to add one channel, especially not one that costs 3X the cost of my premium Roku (with non-premium Rokus costing more like a fifth of the price.)

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  3. Looks little different from Netflix to me... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about this effort, one of the few things of all the shows and collaborations they announced that seemed at all appealing was the Spielberg bringing back "Amazing Stories".

    To me all the big names is kind of a turn off. Not only did that part go on FOREVER and was way to thick on the celebrity worship for my tastes, but to me the bigger names just seem devoid of really interesting ideas, I feel like I have got a lot more unique and interesting content from Netflix.

    I wish them luck, but it's a pretty rough field to be launching a new TV service into, what with both Netflix and Amazon hammering out new shows at a prodigious rate.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re: Looks little different from Netflix to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the first times I agree with you. Thanks for being honest this time.

    2. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, there will be plenty of SJW content.

    3. Re: Looks little different from Netflix to me... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      One of the first times I agree with you. Thanks for being honest this time.

      If you look deep enough, you'll find I am honest 100% of the time... it's just that other times you may disagree with my findings or my preferences. :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand: The border on the TV will be in rose gold. I know, I know... so much innovation! Tim Crook will be deaf from all the fanboy applause.

    5. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I'd say their big competition will be Disney streaming and Netflix and... Netflix despite their strong position I see in more of a longterm downward trend from here. Amazon should be a contender and things may change but for now just those two primarily. If they start bundling the TV service free with 3 months when purchasing hardware, seems like it could go well for them.

    6. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Just think if they had bought Pixar from Jobs instead of Disney.

    7. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

      with both Netflix and Amazon hammering out new shows at a prodigious rate.

      I'd be happier if Apple would focus on existing stuff (eg all from 1966). New Netflix shows proliferate at a prodigious rate. But a lot of them are just based on copy-paste recipes aimed for lasting as long as possible. After only 3 episodes, you know the pattern.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    8. Re: Looks little different from Netflix to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given Apple's track record for catering to gay hipsters and women, I would say their closest competitor would be Hulu.

    9. Re:Looks little different from Netflix to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given Spielberg recently was bitching about Netflix being allowed into the Oscars saying their stuff is "just TV" even though it's film budgets are as big as Hollywood's and the actors are all from Hollywood I don't see him being a good choice to steward something like this for Apple. He clearly has a level of snobbishness that prevents him seeing that the world is changing and that platforms like this can churn out as high quality content (if not higher) than Hollywood ever could.

      The implication being that he sees services like this as second rate, so is he going to put his heart into productions for this service given that he sees them as "just" cheapish TV movie productions rather than big budget productions that Hollywood churns out? If he doesn't view films on services like this with the equivalence of Hollywood to cinema productions then that implies he just isn't going to bother with the appropriate quality to make them a success.

      He's just not shown he has the right mindset for this kind of thing so far, he's stuck in the past with dated views of what services like this mean for a changing industry.

  4. Yet another reason by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    not to update IOS, once they make AppleTV part of it.

    I just wish I could disable the "pending update" notifications.

  5. Nope, not at all by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    Will it be locked to Apple hardware?

    The missing part of the summary is that the Apple "TV" app (distinguished from the Apple TV hardware), is going to be going into a bunch of smart TV's, but also Roku and Amazon TV hardware.

    So you'll be able to see this content on pretty much anything (also iOS).

    Only thing I'm not sure of, as if there will be an Android app... I would say, probably.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Nope, not at all by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      OK, went through a maze of links and was finally able to find something that confirmed what you're saying.

      Money quote:

      The Apple TV app will be available on Samsung smart TVs beginning this spring and on Amazon Fire TV, LG, Roku, Sony and VIZIO platforms in the future.

      I note that, other than Samsung (for obvious reasons) the list is in alphabetical order.

      Odd that they're working with their fiercest rival in the mobile space right now and giving them an exclusive. Maybe they're mellowing a little.

      Chromecast is missing but I really wish Google would stop pushing it anyway. But that's another discussion.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Nope, not at all by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Hm, so no Android TV? Meh. I like the Apple TV fine, but it is useless for playing locally stored content, and I've replaced my Apple TVs with nVidia Shields which do everything rather well.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Nope, not at all by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"So you'll be able to see this content on pretty much anything (also iOS)."

      Except the billions of TV's that never get a firmware update for it.
      And millions of Linux-running laptops/desktops/myth boxes/etc.
      And, as you pointed out, maybe not the billions of Android devices.

      No mention of TiVo, either.

    4. Re:Nope, not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that Sony typically uses Android TV I presume that it will come to that platform eventually.

    5. Re:Nope, not at all by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's a huge step in the right direction for Apple. They make the games Google and Amazon play against each other seem almost tame.

      Apple needs a lot more interoperability if they want to stay relevant, do it's good that they're starting to try.

    6. Re:Nope, not at all by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I like the Apple TV fine, but it is useless for playing locally stored content...

      That's what AirPlay is for, and that runs only on Apple TV.

    7. Re:Nope, not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I have a Samsung Smart TV with all their apps and stuff. I watch through my Nvidia Shield TV because HDMI ARC has so limited audio anything the TV outputs is useless.

  6. Accessible, how? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 2

    If it forces you to have Apple hardware/software then include me out.

    1. Re:Accessible, how? by WankerWeasel · · Score: 3, Informative

      In addition to Apple devices, the Apple TV app will also be available on smart TVs from Samsung, LG, Sony, Vizio, along with Roku and Amazon Fire devices. I'd think there will be a decent chance we might see an Android app at some point too.

  7. Get ready! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's one more big one to come (Apple Arcade), Slashdot seems to be spreading out the stories a bit so as not to flood the feed all at once. Apple had a busy morning, for announcing things you cannot get anytime soon...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Get ready! by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      There's one more big one to come (Apple Arcade), Slashdot seems to be spreading out the stories a bit so as not to flood the feed all at once.

      That's actually the one I'm most interested in. I do most of my gaming on the phone these days, because I can usually only squeeze in 15-20 minutes a day, and I seldom play multiplayer. If you don't play that much, you're just getting smoked all the time. I also hate the pay-to-win approach of a lot of games.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Get ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      battle royale a game of skill? surely thou jest..

    3. Re:Get ready! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That was a pretty good onion article - it's why my Apex Legends score is one victory, one loss, and shall probably stay that way. Only sharply downhill from there.

      A plethora of awesome single player focused games I can spend 30 minuets on? Yes please!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Get ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded you down for being a cunt.

    5. Re: Get ready! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanting to divert investors' attention away from slipping iPhone sales at the end of this quarter.

  8. Even Spielberg, eh? by dbrueck · · Score: 2

    Guess Steve's not /quite/ as anti-streaming as he let on, if the price is right?

    (yeah, I know, it was about feature films, but still)

    1. Re:Even Spielberg, eh? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I get the impression a few Hollywood people, Spielberg and Nolan being the most prominent, have a problem with Netflix rather than an issue with streaming in general. They'll word it as anti-streaming, but they don't seem to care if it's someone other than Netflix doing it.

      And I really don't understand why.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Even Spielberg, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SS has an old-school differentiation between "feature films" and "tv". Streaming is fine for TV, in his opinion and he's happy to do some kinds of work for TV.

  9. Over the Hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are fed up with Spielberg, Oprah and J.J. Abrams, Jennifer Anniston.
    All of the aboveâ(TM)s careers are over the hill.
    But, they make sure that they are in the limelight thanks to their deep pockets.
    And now they have allied themselves with a deeper pocket sponsor to further their doomed careers.
    Enough said.

    1. Re:Over the Hill by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      Came here to say "Boomers" too. Why not also pick up Dick Wolf while you're at it?

    2. Re:Over the Hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aniston is fully GenX. Abrams is (just) GenX. No opinions on Aniston, but Abrams isn't that bad.

    3. Re:Over the Hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is one thing Speilberg knows is what young kids want. :(

    4. Re: Over the Hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Also, it's pretty Ameri-centric. I've nothing against US entertainment, but I'm sick of 12 series long story arcs and sitcoms with writing teams and the same old characters.

  10. all Apple all day slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The walled garden has taken it's first step towards Orwellian. I get it. Lot's of non-Apple news today though, unless your a hatefilled lib and want to distract...

  11. TV sure has evolved by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    Welcome to The Apple Channel
    Welcome to The Microsoft Channel
    Welcome to The Google Channel
    later...
    Welcome to The Apple Country
    Welcome to The Microsoft Country
    Welcome to The Google Country
    later...
    Welcome to The Apple Planet-Hunting Spaceship (looking for anywhere but Earth to inhabit)
    Welcome to The Microsoft Planet-Hunting Spaceship (looking for anywhere but Earth to inhabit)
    Welcome to The Google Planet-Hunting Spaceship (looking for anywhere but Earth to inhabit)

    Seriously, where does this stop. WW3 I assume.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:TV sure has evolved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least WW3 will be Apple vs Alphabet. Microsoft's armies will destroy themselves in a civil war or surrender after the first battle.

    2. Re:TV sure has evolved by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Welcome to The Apple Channel
      Welcome to The Microsoft Channel
      Welcome to The Google Channel
      Seriously, where does this stop.

      It stops where

      Welcome to The OnlyOneRemains Channel

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:TV sure has evolved by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There is profound difference between the three.

      Apple is trying to sell the country club approach and controlled environment you can enter but they have to ensure you can always leave.

      M$ is trying to force full control, to give them the right to monitor, control and censor your digital environment and to lock you.

      Google seeks the exact same thing as M$, just down all sneekily and behind your back, doing the exact same thing that M$ do, just not in your face about jamming a probe up you butt and monitoring and controlling you digital existence, to climb right on your back and suck a corporate tax out of your digital existence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  12. I hope JJ is producing, not directing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every movie he's directed has been terrible. They've all had major problems with action, characters, and plot.

    He has been a fine producer, however. At least he seems able to help better directors make something good.

    1. Re:I hope JJ is producing, not directing. by Camembert · · Score: 1

      In general I agree yet his Star Trek movie was quite ok, I thought.

  13. I buy lots of Apple stuff by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I buy lots of Apple stuff, I've got at least three Apple computers and a couple of iPhones, but my reaction to the whole Apple TV is ... Meh.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I buy lots of Apple stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 6 Macs, 2 iPhones, 2 iPads, 2 ATVs , and an iwatch , and I agree with you 100%, there was nothing of value for me here at all.

    2. Re:I buy lots of Apple stuff by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      6 Macs, 2 iPhones, 2 iPads, 2 ATVs , and an iwatch

      Enough value already!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  14. Is anybody even watching anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've stopped watching most 'fiction', it's just so boring. Scripted shows are cringe. There are a few DIY people on youtube, and some infotainment that I watch. Haven't seen a movie in years, can't remember the last time I could even name a hit show.

    Produce as much of this slop as you want. People have stopped watching.

    1. Re:Is anybody even watching anymore? by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Informative

      You took the words right out of my mouth.

      TV and movies are boring. Uninteresting. Formulaic. Predictable. Remakes of Sequels of ancient TV shows. Seriously has Hollywood run out of creativity?

      To make matters worse, you don't even get a complete movie for the higher ticket prices. It's like a movie now is really just a commercial for its sequel. Sad.

      Protip: a movie should have a beginning, a middle, and a satisfying ending. Even if the ending is unrealistic, it should leave people happy and satisfied. People WANT to be entertained. Clue: it is an escape from reality. If the movie is going to have an unhappy depressing ending -- people can stay home and get that in real life. If you movie is good AND can have a sequel, then great. But that movie MUST stand on its own.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Is anybody even watching anymore? by butchersong · · Score: 2

      You took the words right out of my mouth.

      I see what you did there

    3. Re:Is anybody even watching anymore? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TV and movies are boring. Uninteresting. Formulaic. Predictable. (...) Protip: a movie should have a beginning, a middle, and a satisfying ending. Even if the ending is unrealistic, it should leave people happy and satisfied.

      The irony here is so thick I could cut it with a knife. What you describe sounds like the dullest "and they all lived happily ever after" Disney movie for kids. Some of the best movies I know totally throw the formula out the window like Memento, throw total curve balls where you think you know what's going on but doesn't like The Sixth Sense or have semi-dark endings like Man On Fire where it's obvious not everyone is walking out of there.

      If I want a popcorn flick where the superhero saves the day I can go watch that, but it's never exciting whether Wonder Woman or Aquaman or Spiderman or Iron Man or the Hulk or whatever pulls through - leads don't die if it's rated PG-13 or less. I'd rather watch GoT where nobody's safe and everyone from the evilest shit to the kindest, most innocent character can end up dead any moment. The only thing I'm sure of is that there will always be a Stark in Winterfell.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re: Is anybody even watching anymore? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Marketing for a remake us cheaper than for something new, or for the same price more effective.

      Hero movies, star wars and trek. No need to explain anything. Just say there is a new one and people will come.

      Remake? Nany oeople will look because of nostalgia, so you have already won a lot of eyes. As long as they make money of it, why should they stop?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Is anybody even watching anymore? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      The message the market is sending is make more sequels, remakes, and formulaic movies.

      https://www.pastemagazine.com/

      10. Venom
      U.S. total: $213.2 million

      9. Solo: A Star Wars Story
      U.S. total: $213.77 million

      8. Ant-Man and the Wasp
      U.S. total: $216.65 million

      7. Mission: Impossible â" Fallout
      U.S. total: $220.16 million

      6. The Grinch
      U.S. total: $265.5 million

      5. Deadpool 2
      U.S. total: $318.49 million

      4. Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom
      U.S. total: $416.77 million

      3. Incredibles 2
      U.S. total: $608.58 million

      2. Avengers: Infinity War
      U.S. total: $678.82 million

      1. Black Panther
      U.S. total: $700.06 million

      --
      -Dave
  15. Available when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss the Apple dog-and-pony shows where they announced stuff that was available for purchase/download now (or at least within a week). These days Apple seems to use their announcement shows to promote things that won't see the light of day for months.

  16. Big headlines, no pricing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Apple puts on another show and doesn't announce price? Well I am sure some Apple sheep won't care how much it costs. But It might be interesting to the rest of the world who values services on how much it cost. I'll bet money third party device support will not come out immediately because Apple will try and sell its own hardware first.

  17. 1990s called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    said must-see-TV is coming this fall.

    No body watches TV except in L.A.

  18. Torrent.. just like CBS All-Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bittorrent is almost 20 years old.. it's funny how these exclusive platforms just push people towards illegal methods to obtain the media for free.

  19. Apple fail here - long term traction missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Expect Apple fail with a decent spike in subscribers then lack of subscriber growth and slow loss of subscribers.

    Entering a low margin business with lots of established competition is not Apple's usual business strategy.

    There's no real cost to shifting subscriptions to another provider. Apple only adds a news feed subscription of which only the NY Times in recent memory has garnered significant new subscribers and most of them are from outside the USA.

    I've cancelled subscriptions and paid services other than basic internet and a cell phone with a replacement cell phone every 3 to 4 years.

  20. Do we need more? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    All these people I'll never see or miss in the slightest.

  21. Television A-listers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who the hell cares about Television celebrities? Netflix makes plenty of shows with nobody's, and I actually prefer it that way.

    Also, they're bragging about getting people like Oprah and people from Sony?

    I'm kind of guessing the only purpose of this is to appeal to people who define themselves by how much of a fanboy they are (which is perfect for a lot of the Apple crowd)

    1. Re:Television A-listers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are these the Sony malware hackers that Apple has hired?

      Off with their heads says I ...

  22. Also in video by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Thanks for hunting down the link, I should have done that myself - I saw the names I listed mentioned in the video, so you can also find it there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. After some thought... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'd say their big competition will be Disney streaming and Netflix and... Netflix despite their strong position I see in more of a longterm downward trend from here.

    Why do you see Netflix heading downhill from here? I'd agree if Netflix were spending less on content but every year they spend quite a lot more, I think they are spending way more than Apple! To me the Netflix content just keeps getting better and broader. They are starting to put out movies that are seriously more interesting than most general release movies I see previews for.

    After some thought, I don't think Apple is really even competing against Netflix or Amazon. To me what Apple is offering seems a lot more like HBO (right down to a Sesame Street offering!). I think Apple might be better off than HBO but I'm not sure as even with GOT ending, HBO has some strong properties left.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Oprah? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    So it's all gonna be touchy-feely spiritual bullshit?

    Disclaimer: My GF loves the Oprah channel. I try to ignore it when she has that channel on.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  25. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me when they have something interesting. I've heard enough me-too's.

  26. I don't care about TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find TV boring. I like to read books, watch a movie sometimes. And I like to beat up nerds. Once I really did a number on one of those geek creeps, pulled his arm out of the socket and watched him flail it around until he passed out. He came to his senses only when I pissed on his head, and started to wail in a really disturbing way. Then I kicked his teeth in and stepped on his skull until he stopped moving. Dragged him down to the creek and left him there. Never seen again.

  27. just another.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    splinter of the market.... just another reason to say 'fuck it' and find 'alternative' sources.

    subbing to a dozen different streaming services is fucking stupid. the whole idea... netflix's original concept... was to have everything in ONE PLACE, and inexpensively, with one sub. movies and television, domestic and imports.

    it's almost as if they're TRYING to turn people away from streaming.. away from paying for multiple platforms.. and back to satellite and cable where it's ONE fucking bill... a high bill, but simple. you get shafted big by one company instead of sliced open to bleed to death by a dozen.

  28. Courage by ruddk · · Score: 3, Funny

    All programs will also be in mono, black and white and only in French language because, you know, as they say in France, le courage.

  29. Re:This Was Apple's Plan All Along - Media Company by omnichad · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is satire or lunacy, but it's still 10/10 entertaining.

  30. Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by supremebob · · Score: 1

    If it wasn't annoying enough to have to subscribe to 4 different pay TV services to (legally) watch all the content want to watch, Apple and Disney will soon start their own streaming services hide their premium content behind.

    We're soon going to get to the point where we're going to need an "everything" network that lets you sign up for multiple streaming services at once under a single account. You know, so you can watch all of your shows in once place.... like the Cable Company used to provide 10 years ago.

    1. Re: Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are going to get their money one way or another. Hollywood and the feds demand you pay up. Or else.

    2. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      wait, you actually prefer giving Netflix a monopoly on content so that they can jack the prices to cable co levels or even higher?

    3. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      In what way does Netflix have a monopoly on content? The main reason they would have to raise prices is that the content companies charge Netflix ever increasing rates for licensing.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by mr_lemonade4796 · · Score: 1

      I believe Apple i going to try being the Everything Streaming Service.

      Think Internet Cable TV, with bundled content or pick-ur-own (at higher cost) bundles.

      They have already made deals to carry content from other streaming services. Why not subscribe from 1 place for all your streaming, at a bundled discount.

      -T-

    5. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      It isn't. Thanks to competitors such as Disney, Amazon, Apple... you know, all those you just criticized for trying to compete with Netflix.

    6. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      So are you now arguing that Netflix doesn’t have a monopoly on things it doesn’t own? Also where and when criticized others for trying to compete with Netflix?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    7. Re:Great, yet another channel behind a paywall by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it was not you but the OP (supremebob) who did complain that new competitors were trying to compete with Netflix, as if it was a bad thing.
      What I am saying is we should be thankful Netflix doesn't have a monopoly. The implication is yes, that we have to subscribe to various services to get all content but this is a good thing. If things went the way the OP wanted them too, Netflix WOULD have a monopoly. I never said it was currently the case.

  31. Re:Ad free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, cable was initially ad-free. Heh. Wonder if this is a ploy, kind of like the GIF patent coming from nowhere after GIFs got popular?

  32. Live story-telling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFS: [...] "The new service, billed as a place for the "highest-quality storytelling," will be available in over 100 countries and released starting this fall through the Apple TV app." [...]

    I've always preferred 'live' storytelling: https://www.yakimawa.gov/council/council-business-legislation/

  33. it's a good time to subscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The faint soft praise of /, editors towards technology and down voting medium warm comments turns /. into a half baked more tech is good pr machine.

    Narrow thought patterns if you remove skeptical comments just because you do not agree with them.

  34. Should work like News+ by Camembert · · Score: 1

    Everyone is tired of more and more subscription services. However I do like the model of their news+ service: one subscription cost to 100s of magazines and the content producers are paid based on the amount of time their content is consumed. This model is what I would prefer as a consumer for video streaming services as well. I might well binge on GoT or westworld at HBO - but little else, similarly for other streaming channels.

    1. Re:Should work like News+ by mr_lemonade4796 · · Score: 1

      Canada had at least two mutli-magazine/newspaper subscription services. They did not survive, because not enough people reads newspaper and magazines on tablets and cellphones.

      If content producers are paid based on the amount of time their content is consumed, expect the number of magazines to go down rapidly. A lot will disappear off the service in the first year, unless this is not their only revenue stream, and perhaps the cost of staying on Apples system is low. Eventually though... if readership does not increase, bye bye News+.

        -T-

  35. "highest-quality storytelling" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From storytellers of the highest quality, like Reese Witherspoon, and um... Jennifer Aniston, and... um... Oprah.

    Yep, look out GRRM and Joss Whedon and Ryan Coogler and Taika Waititi and Bryan Fuller and Noah Hawley, we got some real storytellers here now.

    (OK Spielberg gets a pass, but for the good stuff like Close Encounters and E.T., not shit like Ready Player One)

  36. Function over form by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual.

  37. Re:Ad free by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

    My guess is the early business models suggested cable subscriptions could actually support some or all channels through just generic subscriber fees.

    But I think this lasted like 5 minutes, my first exposure to cable was in about 1982 and the stations all had commercials except for HBO.

  38. Cringe Actors Ejected from the Movies by Chissblue · · Score: 1

    Remember that actor you didn't want to bother with going to their movies 20 years ago? Well we have an amazing show for you. Meanwhile all the better shows are mostly supporting actors. Give me a Hugo Weaving or a Richard E Grant show over Ben Afflack any day.

  39. Saturated and Fractured Market by johnsie · · Score: 1

    It seems there are going to be a lot more streaming services by the end of the year, each with their own shows. While it's good that you can watch some great new shows online now, it's going to be annoying that each app has a different fee. Personally I think I'll wait and see which sort of shows each provider comes out with. It does seem like the Internet is going back to the days of Compuserve and AOL though. You will need to choose a subscription to get your web content.

  40. Jennifer Aniston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this is coming on Apple TV, does this mean that Jennifer Aniston no longer thinks that Windows 95 is the way to go?
    https://youtu.be/fXpfdq3WYu4

  41. Spielberg Hypocrisy by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Hilarious. Interesting how people like to complain about something unless they specifically benefit from it...

    Oh boo hoo! Streaming services bad, make bad content! :( Oh HAI! Buy my streaming content on AppleTV! :)

    https://entertainment.slashdot...

    https://www.foxnews.com/entert...