Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do You Feel About the End Of Google+ ? (slashdot.org)

"On April 2nd, your Google+ account and any Google+ pages you created will be shut down and we will begin deleting content from consumer Google+ accounts," Google has been warning since January.

Long-time Slashdot reader shanen writes "it's been grating on me for a while," asking "But is there any real harm here? Do you feel damaged?" On the one hand, my trust in the Google has certainly been damaged by profit-driven directional changes. On such grounds you could argue that the people who most trusted the Google may feel most victimized....

What is the value of IP? Do you feel you expressed or even created any interesting ideas through your use of Google+ as a discussion channel? If so, maybe you feel damaged because it's going away? (Yes, the Archive team wants to preserve it, but IP has to grow to be alive, and the archives aren't easy to search, to boot...)

I'm pretty sure that I started using Google+ a long time ago, back when my own sentiments towards the Google were much more positive. My negative framing of the question could be projection, so maybe your response may explain why it's really a good thing when the Google kills certain ideas?

The original submission also includes the bitter observation that "Innovation is supposed to be important to the Google. Isn't the Google giving us mixed signals here?" But how do Slashdot's readers feel?

Leave your own thoughts in the comments. How do you feel about the end of Google+ ?

192 comments

  1. Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who the hell cares?!

    1. Re:Oh God! by Scarletdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or more poetically, "Behold the field in which I groweth mine fucks. Set thine gaze upon it and see how barren it lies."

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Innovation is supposed to be important to the Google".

      If you actually believe that, then you really are a complete moron. Google has never innovated anything.

      Google cares about Shekels. Nothing more.

      They'll throw a bunch of things against the wall to see if anything sticks, but, at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is Shekels. If you don't bring in enough Shekels, you go away.

    3. Re:Oh God! by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When it was introduced I was mostly reflecting 'Why?", when it started to link stuff together like YouTube etc. then I was "WTF" and now all I can feel is relief.

      I prefer to have isolation between systems unless I decide that I really want to link information together.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    4. Re:Oh God! by cyberpunkrocker · · Score: 2

      I don't. I never used it. Period.

    5. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not many people...that's why they ended it.

    6. Re:Oh God! by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The other day I was going to post a somewhat smutty joke to a youtube video, and noticed it was signed in with one of my work emails. So I changed the user in youtube and it changed *all* gmail tabs to that user.

      It's millennials. They can't design shit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they can. And why don't you buy two Chromebooks (every 2-3 years)

    8. Re:Oh God! by antdude · · Score: 1

      NBA, Comcast, Toyota, CBS, customer, health, Obama, etc. care!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:Oh God! by Fulminata · · Score: 3, Informative

      The indie tabletop RPG scene really adopted Google+. Why? Damned if I know, but they've been struggling to find an alternative since the announcement was made that it was going away.

    10. Re: Oh God! by shm · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It's by design. They don't care about your image; they want max their knowledge about you to make you a better target for their ads.

    11. Re:Oh God! by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I won't be relieved until it's actually gone -- and even then, only if they don't break too much stuff in the process.

      God knows how many people will find themselves locked out of their YouTube or GMail accounts if Google stuffs this up (as they so often do).

      Every time they "fix" one thing they end up breaking a dozen other things. The Google ecosystem is a mess due to the number of bits they've killed off.

      I fear the 2nd!

    12. Re:Oh God! by jrumney · · Score: 5, Funny

      Calm down, it is just an April Fool story. Everybody knows that nobody cares about the demise of Google+.

    13. Re:Oh God! by radoslav.dejanovic · · Score: 2

      Tell them to take a look at mewe.com - they have a G+ import tool (archive must be in JSON format).

    14. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ask me about how I feel. This outcome is merely logical. :) Todays' April joke, tomorrow's reality. Watch Google shut this down in the next few years. No, really.

    15. Re:Oh God! by shanen · · Score: 1

      I wish I got a mod point to mod that one up.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    16. Re: Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not like I went to Google and agreed to make an account with them for that. That was something they tried to force down our throats. Fuck Google+.

    17. Re:Oh God! by Megane · · Score: 1

      I revolted against the real names requirement they put on YouTube because they wanted to CROSS-LINK ALL THE THINGS, logged out my YT account, and stayed logged out! A year or two ago I finally got my YouTube ID back through their "legacy accounts" page. It had been more than 10 years.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    18. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't hurt my feelings if Facebook died with it.

    19. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have to considering how cheaply those pieces of junk are made.

    20. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know man, at least some millennials understand how cookies and private browser windows work.

    21. Re: Oh God! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If they can jump across tabs to change the account they can jump across tabs without my even knowing.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Oh God! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Then again, us greybeards understand the difference between a privacy issue and a usability one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Oh God! by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      What about setting up a website?

      Why is no one able anymore to do anything on the web if it is not in one of those walled gardens?

      --
      bickerdyke
  2. At least they let you download your data by Krishnoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can use Google Takeout to download your data and rehost it elsewhere for any of their services. Do other major players make it convenient/possible to do that?

    1. Re:At least they let you download your data by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0

      What, you think you own your data with the other players? Someone's delusional...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there also a Google Wipeout tool to afterwards remove it from their system?

    3. Re:At least they let you download your data by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      What, you think you own your data with the other players? Someone's delusional...

      Step 1: Make up an unwarranted assumption about what somebody thinks

      Step 2: Criticise them for thinking the thing you assumed they thought.

      Step 3: Derp

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you think you know either way? Someone's disgusting yellow fever...

    5. Re:At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, little boy.

    6. Re:At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you utilize non-centralized platforms you don't have this problem. Go Mastodon! Though I admit it's not Facebook it's not like there aren't also other decentralized social networking platforms equivalent to it. I just am not familiar with them as I don't utilize any of them.

    7. Re: At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is. But it will run automatically.

    8. Re: At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is. But it will run automatically.

      Yeah, and I'll believe that...right up until we hear of the first court case that legally requests that data.

      I can assure you, it will magically re-appear.

    9. Re:At least they let you download your data by radoslav.dejanovic · · Score: 1

      I've moved to mewe.com - they have an import tool for that (JSON zips).

    10. Re:At least they let you download your data by shanen · · Score: 1

      I actually looked at the data. Without the structure it becomes almost completely meaningless, even though I created some of it.

      Some of the data appeared to be derived information that I couldn't interpret at all. Not even with imaginary numbers.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    11. Re: At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Google stored images on Picasa for a while without asking users if they wanted to or not. I had a Youtube profile pic get hosted there and I couldn't find it again to delete or change it. Google kept using it though.

    12. Re: At least they let you download your data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google shill thinks this useless feature is actually useful. Tell me, why would Shillden want to download all those dick pics in one big zip file?

    13. Re:At least they let you download your data by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Hold on. You can DL your data, but they offer no way to merge that data into another account. Takeout is cool, but its one way only.

      --
      Good-bye
    14. Re:At least they let you download your data by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can use Google Takeout to download your data and rehost it elsewhere for any of their services. Do other major players make it convenient/possible to do that?

      Yes. You can download your Facebook activity. Settings -> Your facebook information -> Download your information.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. Never used it, don't trust Goog, not disappointed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I hope they kill the rest of it soon.

  4. Re: Oh God! Geocities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Geocities Japan is ending this month is much more concerning

  5. What's google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it better than Google?

    1. Re:What's google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your subject looks like a regexp. Same way a 4 chord song is good for success, a social media name that looks like a regexp is probably not the worlds greatest name...

      That is just my 2c, I mean 2 BTC

    2. Re: What's google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait 2BTC =2Â now!?

  6. Notice It? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    I got the requisite Google+ account when the hype train was in operation, but I won't notice it at all when the service goes away.

    1. Re:Notice It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the pointless doppelganger troll perspective.

    2. Re:Notice It? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      You're welcome, whoever you are.

      No, maybe not.

    3. Re:Notice It? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At the time, Facebook was making a lot of money, and winning a lot of advertiser interest, because they had the age and gender of their users. That is something advertisers care a lot about.

      So what did Google do? Created a clone of Facebook, got everyone's age and gender (and real name), harassed people until they gave up their information, then dropped it.

      Google+ was a data harvesting operation, nothing more.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Notice It? by shanen · · Score: 1

      I think it's a major strain to describe Google+ as a clone of Facebook. Not even clear that it was a wannabe clone, though the google did want to get into the game. There were too many differences in the approaches of the two systems.

      If Google Plus had actually had some good ideas, then I think similar ideas would have appeared within Facebook. Have I overlooked something? I admit that I don't use Facebook much these days. (My FFF solution really worked much better than I expected in terms of cutting my motivation to look at Facebook.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    5. Re: Notice It? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You're still looking at it as if you were the customer. The advertisers are the ones Google sells to, and Google+ got them what they wanted, which was your user info. Google analytics is kind of amazing these days.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re: Notice It? by shanen · · Score: 1

      Basically concurrence, though I think the chronology is a bit confused. At first they didn't know who the customers were, but once they figured out where the money was coming from, of course they started following it. The businesses that don't manage to wrap themselves around the money are the businesses that go away, get crushed, or are bought out.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  7. I'll miss it, esp. since they finally got it right by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google+ had all kinds of growing pains, typically involving the addition unnecessary whitespace. Plus tagging often worked very poorly, with everyone but the person you were trying to tag coming up in the list, and with it sorting and re-sorting itself under your mouse pointer (or finger) when you finally found them. But recently, they got everything working nicely, including translation. Therefore, it's sad to see it go, as it was the easiest social network to use with an international community.

    G+ never had many users, so this will not cause a lot of harm. I went to Pluspora so as to have an alternative to Facebook for things I actually want to post publicly. (If I cared whether people actually read what I said, I'd post somewhere other than either. More people probably read me here, for example.) But Google isn't actually killing it, they're just making it a feature only in their business office product. Perhaps they got tired of patrolling it for porn.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Easy question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had farts that meant more to me than Google+'s existence.

    1. Re: Easy question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell, same

    2. Re: Easy question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your farts are more important to me than anything Google offers.

  9. Maybe... by Luthair · · Score: 1

    they'll ditch the moronic real names on youtube.

  10. One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The end of Google+ is alright and all, but what we REALLY need is the end of Facebook. When that day comes there will be much rejoicing.

    1. Re:One down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hold your breath. Unless you're capable of holding it for at least a generation.

  11. A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I thought Google+ had some interesting ideas going on. But something about using it for much at all really turned me off, even though for a while Google has some pro photographers heavily promoting it and it seemed to get some traction in that space...

    But that was the thing about Google+, it never got any traction for anyone without pressure from Google, so as soon as that pressure even lightened up support evaporated. You just can't have a social network no-one is on!

    I still can't put my figure though on why it never went anywhere with anyone I knew, when facebook and twitter lasted...

    In the end I'm actually pretty happy it's going away so I can stop feeling bad for not posting there. Now I can focus on not posting to just instagram and facebook.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The main reason it didn't displace Twitter and Facebook is that it didn't offer anything actually different - just little tweaks on the existing formula.
      And it didn't solve the "let an enormous company that makes money off building a profile of you know everything you do" problem.

      The only alternative proposed so far that solves that, is Diaspora* - but it suffered from initially being mostly a "how hard can it be?" idea rather an a serious software project.

      Eventually, and despite its beginnings, it reached the point where it was useful, and even maybe started living up to some of the initial over-hyping, but by then no one was interested anymore.

    2. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by nonBORG · · Score: 2

      Google use names for things that just don't help user who use things once in a while. eg Hangouts. I think it is some sort of skype or something but it is the stupidest name on earth. Can you tell someone in business meet you on hangouts for a quick catchup?

      I think the issue is google has lots of smart kids that want the world to conform to their little bubble of thinking, they do not put the customer first.

      Google+ was just a copy of facebook with no vision and no reason for people to use it, i.e. no compelling reason to switch from facebook. Google should have brought facebook outright for 40Bil or something instead of wasting time here. If facebook cost money (monthly) and Google+ was free it may have worked. Facebook has plenty that could be improved but the google crew are not the team to do it.

      What they could have done is found 1000 people and asked them what are 3 things you would like to improve about facebook. Then got 3 thousand things to improve, narrowed it down to
      Google have a so much money and ability but seem to lack the straight business sense of Microsoft who brought hotmail and skype etc. This shows that Microsoft know business better than google. Even if google win in a lot of technical areas.

      --
      You can't handle the truth! - Because I don't post left all my comments get modded down, bye bye Karma.
    3. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by lkcl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still can't put my figure though on why it never went anywhere with anyone I knew,

      i wrote about this at the time. facebook is known for being non-mission-critical. if facebook doesn't like your use of its service, and terminates your account, so what, big deal.

      however as *actually happened* with several people, the forced requirement of an incredibly dangerous "real name" policy, if people joined up to google+ and refused to accept the dangerous requirement, ACCESS TO TEN YEARS OF EMAIL AND DOCS WAS TERMINATED WITHOUT WARNING. and there was absolutely no recovery mechanism.

      i have over 50,000 messages dating back 12 years, on which i critically rely for business and for coordinating software libre projects. termination of access to all of that would be catastrophic.

      i also wrote about why "real name" policies are incredibly dangerous. they break the rule that everyone knows: everyone KNOWS that you DO NOT TRUST an online identity. period.

      any Corporation that sets itself up as the "God Of Identity" is just... so wrong on so many levels, it's just not funny. youtube data breach only a few months ago. equifax data breach. ashley madison data breach. cambridge analytica. dozens more that can be found on https://haveibeenpwned.com/Pwn...

      *how many more* of these are we going to have to have before people start to wake up?

    4. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I still can't put my figure though on why it never went anywhere with anyone I knew, when facebook and twitter lasted..."

      Let me solve that problem for you.

      People didn't need Google+ because they already had a facebook account.

      Google is also commonly known to kill off side business ventures all the time.

      Facebook may sell your data, but hey, guess what Google does?

      So basically, they have facebook, google won't treat them any better as people, and there's a very good chance their accounts would evaporate in a few years when google+ doesn't become the next big thing. Guess what happened? Hopefully all those google+ users still have their facebook accounts to go back to amirite?

      For me, their pressure of forcing you into google+ if you tried to sign up for any of their other services basically means I still don't have a youtube account. Even after google+ is deleted I'm not going to sign up for youtube any time soon as my desire to post videos of any sort has dwindled - plus there's a non-zero chance google is killing off google+ because they have something else to launch that they'll force people to sign up for. Thus, taking a wait and see approach.

    5. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did have a youtube account then turned into a google account. google+ effectively meant nothing for me but I still deleted it all since the google/youtube account would stalk me onto the google search page and google declared that they would link all activities, that was in 2012 perhaps and the retirement of "do no evil" was then.
      I didn't mind google+ since I never used it at all and I don't think the real issue (stalking across search, maps and youtube) was directly because of it. Using any google account whatever the reason for would have resulted in a login/logout nightmare for me. If I were to sign up for a google account guess what, they will still do this forever and don't need a google+ replacement. They have immense "social media" stuff simply with google doc, gmail and youtube. What do you think the comments and buttons and view counts are.
      They're launching a "cloud" gaming platform as well - video games are thinly disguised social media. Steam did it with user profile/user pic, spying, friends list etc.

    6. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      gmail (less likely yahoo) screwed up my moving of my yahoo email to gmail about 12 years ago. No yahoo mail was moved, yahoo mail was deleted on yahoo.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    7. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      facebook is known for being non-mission-critical

      It is listed as as homepage in vast majority of restaurants I have encountered in my real life.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    8. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      have over 50,000 messages dating back 12 years, on which i critically rely for business

      ^^^ !!! Don't use free services who provide no service-level agreement and no contact information or tech support for mission critical operations!

    9. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      *how many more* of these are we going to have to have before people start to wake up?

      At least one more.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    10. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The features that made it attractive for me, are exactly what never made it gain traction.

      I liked the concept of easily being able to post things and only have certain groups of people be able to see it, but generating a massive amount of new daily content consume is what makes social networks possible. I can go on facebook and see new things my vast network of fake friends creates, where if only looking within my group of actual friends maybe 2-3 things a day at most, with much of that being things they found on facebook.

    11. Re:A mixture of bad and good ideas, not lasting by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I still can't put my figure though on why it never went anywhere with anyone I knew, when facebook and twitter lasted...

      It didn't have any serious advantages over either, so network affects meant it was never going to get any traction.

      It was never going to displace Twitter because Twitter didn't have the real names policy, and Twitter's 140 character limit worked for the type of thing people shared on Twitter.

      It was never going to displace Facebook because while it had a few small advantages (I _loved_ the circles thing), people who wanted social networking without pseudonymity already were on Facebook. They weren't going to move.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  12. Don't care that it is gone... by Vanyle · · Score: 1

    But I am really tired of google killing off services. Even if few people use it, it can really screw over those who do. For a company trying to break into corporate (G Suite) this kind of thing seems to happen all to often.

  13. Meh by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    It was a fair service at best and I never saw anything in it that differentiated it from other platforms out there.

    Hopefully we'll start seeing a culling of social media platforms with the remaining ones excelling at:
    - User security
    - Dealing with assholes ^H^H^H^H^H Trolls
    - Identifying and removing fake news

    1. Re:Meh by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      - not abusing your privacy (Facebook, looking at you)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  14. Re:I'll miss it, esp. since they finally got it ri by shanen · · Score: 2

    Thanks for the link to Pluspora. Sounds interesting, and I should have suggested including alternatives to Google+ (when I submitted the story).

    I'm also curious about what you think they got right? The only aspect I remember sort of liking about Google+ was the categorization of circles of interest.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  15. About how I feel about Orcut by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google had a social network called Orcut, after an engineer there who was named Orcut and is still trying his hand at social networking. That was Google's social network before Google+. It played well in South America, I think, but didn't catch on as much elsewhere. I don't remember how it finally played out. We just have to wait a while, and Google will do it's third social network.

    1. Re:About how I feel about Orcut by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Oops. Wrong spelling: Orkut.

    2. Re:About how I feel about Orcut by Lisias · · Score: 2

      Orkut. :)

      Yeah, that was a good Social Network. Your own timeline was your timeline, it was not merged on a huge wall of things that you most doesn't care.

      Communities was the keyword there. And it worked very well. But then Google decided it should promote Google Wave, that flopped. People didn't saw a need for Wave, as Orkut was already good enough.

      Then Google killed Orkut, and tried to shove Google+ on us. Interesting enough, G+ was good and could had become the "New Orkut" - but Google knows better, and decided that all the content on Orkut should die. The same way they're doing with G+ now.

      Do you know? I don't think Google will ever manage to get their feed on a Social Network again. They destroyed everything they managed to build with plain disregard for people willing to keep their social networkings from the last product. It's insane. No one will thrust them again for some time.

      The best and longer living products are the ones they bought, by the way. Everything else is kaput.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    3. Re:About how I feel about Orcut by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Well, and Gmail. The principle developer of which gave them "don't be evil" and of course he is now gone and they erased the moto.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:About how I feel about Orcut by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Then Google killed Orkut, and tried to shove Google+ on us

      You left out the reason. Orkut was conquered by Brazil, and became worthless for anyone else. Every day it was just a bunch of add requests from Brazilians I'd never heard of. Google wanted an international community, not just Brazilians, which is why they cancelled it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. You assume much, young padawan by locater16 · · Score: 1

    The assumption here is that I feel anything about Google+, or even remember that it's still technically not ended. Both assumptions are of course, in error.

  17. I'm annoyed that you cant remove the app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From your phone. its one of those protected apps, that you need to root your device to get rid of it!
     

  18. iGoogle by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't care about Google+, but I'm still broken up about the end of iGoogle. That was the best start page I've ever used. It had these widgets for Gmail and RSS and other good stuff so everything was in once place. Smooth integration with Google Calendar. I've been through every iGoogle copy, like start.me, and Chrome's Awesome New Tab extension and a bunch of others, and they're never good, or good for very long.

    I've never really forgiven Google for killing off iGoogle. It was a tool I used all the time and now it's gone. Those bastards.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:iGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, it's Google Wave. I started using it quite extensively with colleagues and with family as well. And boom. Gone. Still miss it.

    2. Re:iGoogle by moronikos · · Score: 1

      I signed up for Google Wave and could never really figure out what it was for. Pretty much like the majority of everyone else.

    3. Re:iGoogle by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I’ve been using ustart.org since they killed off iGoogle. It’s not quite as user-friendly, but it gets the job done.

      But, yeah. I think I liked iGoogle more than any other Google offering.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:iGoogle by kbg · · Score: 1

      Yes same here. iGoogle was the most useful thing on the internet. Now I use ighome.com it's almost like iGoogle and it's free.

    5. Re:iGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the comment I was looking for. When Google announce the end of iGoogle, there primary reason was that it would be replace with Google+. I still scratch my head at that, I mean WTF they are nothing alike. The best I have found to replace it is igoHome.com.

      I agree 100% with you that they are bastards for killing this off. This, along with multiple other great and stable applications that Google has killed off, is the reason I (and our company) will never use Google for any type of business process.

      The other unforgivable app kill off that Google did is Picasa.

      Fuck Google.

  19. I'm strongly in favor of it. by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    Google forced everyone into Google+ one day. As such, I'm glad it's being reverted.

    It has the extra-good side effect of creating an event we can point to (yet another one) in showing why Google shouldn't be given all that much trust- either during its birth, or during its execution.

    I'm sad for the people who used it, of course- a competitor to facebook would have been nice, and some people just enjoyed the fact that it was a social network that did what they wanted.

    1. Re:I'm strongly in favor of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sad for the people who used it, of course- a competitor to facebook would have been nice, and some people just enjoyed the fact that it was a social network that did what they wanted.

      I'm all for opt in, and maybe making it not something with a primary link, but heck, how much does it take to maintain it just to at least keep their company involved in it? Surely maintaining it is less expensive than developing it in the first place and maybe you have to lock it down a bit to prevent abuse, but just turning it off seems questionable.

      Another originally google application I wish they would have kept developing is SketchUp. It got bought, and now the new company isn't even updating the free windows version, though there is a web version. If I had infinite free time I might consider finding a free game library or something to base a clean implementation around, maybe with the idea of automatically creating code compliant models. The biggest key to making sketchup models it making components, then components of components.

  20. Wish it was really going away by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work in academia, and Google+ is continuing on, zombie-like, there as part of G Suite for Education. It’s the worst of both worlds - a small user base means Google will pay absolutely no attention to it, but when I go to delete my G+ account I get dire warnings regarding all sorts of data being deleted from other places as well.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Wish it was really going away by swillden · · Score: 1

      I work in academia, and Google+ is continuing on, zombie-like, there as part of G Suite for Education. It’s the worst of both worlds - a small user base means Google will pay absolutely no attention to it

      I think it's more likely that it will evolve towards becoming more of an enterprise-focused communications tool. The internal G+ is heavily used by a lot of Google employees, and I believe it's used quite a bit by many GSuite customers outside of education.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re: Wish it was really going away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because Google is just KILLING it with enterprise software right now.

  21. rip the bandaid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google keeps emailing me, just bloody do it already

  22. Re:I'll miss it, esp. since they finally got it ri by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm also curious about what you think they got right?

    They got rid of the bad whitespace, they got plus tagging working like one expected, and it was just generally competent. I guess we were just the beta testers. It didn't cost me anything, and I don't depend on it for anything, so I'm not upset about it. It does confirm my opinion that Google feels free to discontinue things without any concern for the users, but that's not exactly a secret in any case. If one isn't even a paying customer, one doesn't have much right to complain. I think it would be unfair not to provide a whole bunch of warning if they were going to discontinue something major like gmail... or Android.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Pretty Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if anyone just caught onto Google's 'profit driven' motives, where have you been for the past 20+ years? This is nothing new, to say the least. Did you think they were a charity, lol?

  24. Kendall has zero interesting ideas going on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " They see people almost being denied a supreme court seat because they once had a beer while in school." - No, he perjured himself under oath. It's not the beer, you lying faggot. IT'S THE LYING, YOU LYING FAGGOT.

    YOU TELL A LIE UNDER OATH AND YOU ARE A CRIMINAL. That he basically ATTEMPTED TO RAPE A CLASSMATE also didn't really rise to the occasion of a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS without investigation.

    But with TRAITOR SUPPORTING DISHONEST FAGGOTS LIKE YOURSELF in charge? He sailed right through anyway, to lie another day.

    Dry your eyes, traitor. Your little perjurer didn't get caught - yet!

      https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=13577626&cid=58274188

  25. What is/was google+ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems another fly by night web site/service has come and gone with out me ever knowing what it is or even noticing.

    Why, after all these years of such happening are people making themselves so dependent on these things that they get all upset when they disappear?

    Daft.

  26. As if millions of voices cried out in terror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and were suddenly silenced.

    As if !!!

    How do I feel?

    I weep for the content that will be lost forever, for the friendships that shall never be formed, for generations who will never have the opportunity to participate.

    Not!

    Frankly I am more bothered by oppression throughout the globe. AFAICT no one will be safe.

  27. I'll miss the convenient one-click logins... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... that I could use on a lot of websites, but that's about it.

    1. Re:I'll miss the convenient one-click logins... by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Google single sign-on isn't going away. It's just their social network that's being deleted.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  28. How Do You Feel About the End Of Google+ ? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Like the morning breeze.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  29. Google+ by wbpeckham · · Score: 2

    I found Google+ (G+) a far more sane place than any other social media site. It did not serve the same purpose as every other site, it was unique in many ways. I will miss it terribly. I have successfully migrated over to MEWE, which is becoming somewhat more like G+ every day, and expect it to provide everything G+ did. In time. I can understand that G+ was becoming more of a liability every day, and under attack from governments and cyber criminals. I cannot blame Google. But I will still miss it.

    --
    William B. Peckham, Ancient Warrior, Network/System Admin, Teacher
  30. Another one bites the dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm happy.

  31. In a word; "pissed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Googs has thrown it's final straw on my back with shutting down ploos. They simply cannot be trusted to keep their services alive, and as such I am moving absolutely everything away from them. I'm sure they'll keep their main profit generators going, of course, but what happens when the markets change and they decide that email isn't profitable any more? I'll be glad I've moved on, especially with their recent announcement of AMP in gmail. Fuck that shit. I'm utterly dumbfounded that they haven't killed off Youtube yet. YT Red must be profitable I guess.

    So, in shutting down G+, they have lost a single solitary number. "Whoopty fuck" is about the only consideration that might be given, and even then, I'm just not that important, but I'm most certainly done with them.'

    captcha: farces

    1. Re:In a word; "pissed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap I web searched for "AMP in gmail" and this is pretty unbelievable. Let's send you "dynamic email". Nothing will go wrong lol!

      Youtube is a loss leader, I would surmise it costs them billions to run that thing. This bought them a near monopoly which is useful in getting people hooked up and also collecting user data on billions/trillions of views. Very useful, huge network effect, huge scale makes it fast and low latency to the user. The EU censorship law will reinforce their Youtube monopoly : increased costs and legal issues for competitors, small scale video sites forced to close or go rogue.
      YT Red is virtually unknown, to me anyway, it's one of those limited area things.

  32. Google+? What's that? by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

    What was Google +? It was like Fakebook, except NOT from FakeBook.

    I tried to export my Google+ data. The only thing was, after all that time, I didn't have any.

  33. It's almost like by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 2

    It's almost like it never even happened really. If facebook were to close shop tonight 1/10th of the world would shit themselves. G+ close and it's like, meh nothing of value is lost, move along, nothing to see here and in 2 weeks nobody will even remember lol.

  34. I miss the old Google by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Pre 2012, before penguin came along. G was so much easier to manipulate... :|

    --
    [($)]
  35. Google+ still exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assumed it died a quick and horrible death shortly after its creation.

  36. Re: Oh God! Geocities! by uncqual · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the excite.com customized personal dashboard which I've used since back when dashboards were cool (probably within weeks of excite.com's first becoming available) just went away. Both of us users will miss it.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  37. Google + ended? by rainhill · · Score: 1

    I must have been sleeping very long.

  38. its unacceptable to infringe on my data rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we all deserve data rights. keep the lights on FOREVER.

  39. April Fools, it's all a joke by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

    On April 2nd Google will announce that they will continue with Google+.

  40. 2757 days by mseeger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I started posting on G+ on July 3rd 2011 and stopped on January 19th 2019. That is 2757 days.

    In that time I posted 2747 posts (not counting private posts) which received 17494 +1, 10357 comments and 2469 reshares.

    As all good things tend to, this too had to end. In this case it is not entirely voluntary but Google was forcing my hands. I do not stay at pubs till the innkeeper throws me out, so I was leaving there too at a time of my choosing.

    This would usually also be the place where I would thank Google for giving us the opportunity of this social media. But currently my feelings are rather "f*ck you" for how the closure is handled. They burnt more trust than most companies ever get from me in a lifetime. I do not appreciate getting lied to and shunned. As mentioned elsewhere, one of my plans in 2019 is to move every possible service of mine away from Google.

    I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack threads on fire off the shoulder of Brexit. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Gamer Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to quit.

    1. Re:2757 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack threads on fire off the shoulder of Brexit. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Gamer Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to quit.

      Yeah but it was on Google+ so no one else saw it

    2. Re:2757 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack threads on fire off the shoulder of Brexit. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Gamer Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to quit.

      Quit what, the internet? Perhaps you should, little one. Clearly your mind is too immature to handle the fact that you've just described what goes on across the entire internet. All day, every day, data gets created and deleted that 99.999% of us don't even know about, and probably "wouldn't believe".

      Data comes and goes, but it is up to us humans to preserve our timeline. Besides, with the continuing devolution of humanity (gadget addiction and social media isn't exactly making the next generation smarter), I question the value of documenting history when so few fail to learn from it.

    3. Re:2757 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to quit.

      My kingdom for a mod point!

    4. Re:2757 days by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

      The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long - and you have burned so very, very brightly, Google+.

      --

      You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    5. Re:2757 days by Eubeleus · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much how I feel about it. I had a large, active group of friends on there - facebook eschewers, academics, etc. It had the feel similar to pre-Eternal-September Usenet. It's made me want to abandon all google products - which is going to cause trouble for me because I use Android on Google FI. I mean, until they decide they're not going to continue with those either. I'm firmly now in the "don't trust 'em" camp after being one of their biggest boosters among my peers. Back to the agony of running my own mail server...

    6. Re:2757 days by sjukfan · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure for how long I been on Google+ but I'm planning to do my last post on April 2nd, and that will be my symbolic divorce with Google. I enjoyed Google+ and how you could meet people there in a way I don't think you do on Facebook. But that's not what's most important. With this I feel I've lost the trust I had in Google. I want stable technology and things that work not just today but also tomorrow and next year, and I don't feel Google is the right partner for that anymore.

  41. boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid. Never interesting. Friends would post about broccoli for dinner. Boring. Not sure if I ever "upload any content", pretty sure I never made a comment or posted a photo. Nothing to save.

  42. moot now works on Google Maps in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. They're not interested in niche products by Lurks · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you remember how the press endless banged on about how Google+ was small and that it was 'beaten' by Facebook? People are still doing it here. Well, I used it a lot. It was awesome. However Google killed it off before this actual shutdown.

    Before G+ was a thing, it was Buzz. Buzz was a locally centred discussion platform and it ended up being an interesting way to establish a social graph. I met some really interesting people in my city and we had many deep conversations. Buzz moved to G+, and everything continued there. Then one day they decided that photos were where it was at and destroyed the platform as a discussion board. Design changes just meant that images were kept and text was shortened to two lines in a feed. It quickly became just another image based platform of narcissists. I don't know how it did numbers wise after that, but it totally killed the platform for most of the people who were there from the start. My archive of G+ shows that I crafted a load of posts that took a lot of time. I was using it in place of a blog, and I benefited from people actually reading and interacting with my posts. Not any more.

    It seems to me that it was this theme which shaped the way Google approached all of their products and G+ itself is just the latest. They hated the negative press. If they were seen to be second to someone doing billions, then better not to do it at all. That shift right is what made me, and anecdotally a lot of my friends, change out our view of Google. I don't suppose there was ever a time Google cared what we thought, it's just that now it was clear.

    Fuck you Google.

    1. Re:They're not interested in niche products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel your pain, though not with Google+. I learned a few years ago that Google is not to be trusted with keeping apps going. They are like a kid with ADHD, as soon as something new and shiny comes along, they drop everything else. I bitched when they killed off iGoogle and said that Google+ was the replacement. Out our company we refuse to use any Google apps for business processes for this very reason.

      Fuck Google

  44. Google what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another product they lost interest in. Apart from mail, drive and compute platforms, I don't see them as being here for the long term.

  45. Re: What's google++? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sucked because google+ is shit, unlike google++.

  46. Google+ had some good features going for it. by seeker_1us · · Score: 1

    I really liked Google+. It was a great place if you wanted to share your hobby work. Trying to move on to MeWe now.

  47. Surely you jest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my trust in the Google has certainly been damaged

    Bwahahahaha!

  48. Indifferent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -||-

  49. There was space for another social network. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    It was a shame that they tried to ape Facebook. They should've done the exact opposite and let Google+ be a sort of high Profile social Plattform. I did like the features and app integration. ... But I don't miss it too much either, despite being a heavy Google user.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  50. I'd feel waaay better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about the end of Google.

  51. Nintendo did by _merlin · · Score: 1

    Nintendo let you download an archive of your Miiverse posts when they shut down the service. I appreciated that.

  52. Social Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never used it, never will. Missed? I didn't even know it.

    Believe it or not, you can survive just fine without social media.

  53. It's the End of the World as we know it by Laxator2 · · Score: 2

    And I feel fine.

    I am really glad that Google's arrogance had backfired.
    Remember when they decided to expose the user's real names without the user's consent ?
    What a way to win over the users. Their CEO should get the idea that people are more than just hashes in a table.

  54. yuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never wanted it. I was forced into it by having a gmail account. It can't vanish soon enough.

  55. Google could have been the next Yahoo messenger by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    1. Have text chat.
    2. Have webcam.
    3. Have voice chat.
    4. Have file sending.
    5. Have chatrooms.
    Everyone would have wanted to be on Google for "free" with the ads.
    Their user name a key to voice, cam, txt and file fun.
    Should have kept working on it and sold it to consumers for "free".

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  56. google + by chromejockey · · Score: 1

    Well I won't trust Google like I used to

  57. run firefox for personal, chrome for work by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Just run two diff browsers dude.

    F google.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:run firefox for personal, chrome for work by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When there are two that aren't shite I'll give that a go.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:run firefox for personal, chrome for work by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Links is great for work, while lynx is great for home.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  58. Chain reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping Facebook following the same path...

  59. It was nice when it started ... by hholzgra · · Score: 2

    with circles giving you easy control over what taget audience sees what, and a rather text centric stream.

    Nice alternative to facebook ... but then they failed to built up on that differentiation, and rather tried to become more like facebook themselves.

    There was no need for a second facebook that's just the same though ...

  60. Google+ ending is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Double plus good

  61. Bye G+ by surkum · · Score: 1

    Bye G+, It now seems that if you are not moving mainstream you're "avocado" to die.

    Sure L&S weren't pondering that this will ultimately lead to a total extintion of any innovation and critical thinking, as they are killing the small nests were that things slowly grow.

    Been diferent is a privilege only a few can enjoy and suffer.

    RIP G+
    Still remembering you GReader :)

    --
    here ends what some neis
  62. Googled "What is google+" by gotan · · Score: 1

    That was the first thing i did upon reading about it.

    And to be honest i still don't know. There's some google stuff around, like google (search engine), google documents, gmail, and it is connected to youtube too, but it's often hard to see where one thing ends and another begins.

    To my current understanding google+ is the google-version of facebook (but most likely i got that wrong or at best only partially correct).

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    1. Re:Googled "What is google+" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It was an easily curated social media platform that didn't bombard you with crap.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  63. What's grating on me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "the Google"?! It's plain "Google" not "the Google".

  64. So whatever happened to Google Books? by shanen · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know Google Books hasn't gone away completely, but it feels close enough to dead these years... This story and topic has gotten me to thinking about lots of dashed hopes.

    The feature Google Books never had (at least as far as I could tell) would have been a virtual bookshelf feature. The idea would be to see the books that are shelved near a particular book, though you'd need to filter it in various ways for practical use. Perhaps the virtual shelf would be limited to books published in the last 20 years by default, but spanning many libraries to give a really broad view of the related literature.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  65. April Fools! Tell us how you really feel LOL by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Saw what you *tried* to do there, but I' ve already had my Starbucks Treinta this mornin'

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  66. Slow day? (yet again) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google + is gone. Who cares and why the angst over nothing? Get a life!

  67. I don't care about G+... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...but I'm extremely pissed off about the forthcoming death of Hangouts.

    Once upon a time we has MSN Messenger, Yahoo Instant Messenger, Google Talk/Chat/Voice to name but three. Now all gone (or about to go).

    Surely somebody can supply a text and occasional voice/video chat program that will work on Windows, Linux, iOS & Android? In a world this big is that too much to ask? Apparently so, unless someone can tell me better...

    1. Re: I don't care about G+... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Skype meet those requirements?

    2. Re: I don't care about G+... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the footprint of an elephant and microsoft's caked in spyware, Yes.

    3. Re:I don't care about G+... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      didn't hangouts become duo?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re: I don't care about G+... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You have to meet people some other way with skype. And it uses much more CPU and BW in tests here. I'm only interested in vidchat, the rest you can keep.

    5. Re: I don't care about G+... by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Skype meet those requirements?

      In theory, although as has already been said it's absolutely massive, so much so that my older machines won't even run it.

      Last time I used it it was also flakey, horrible, every single update made it worse to use, and last I heard it didn't run properly on Linux (although that may have been sorted out now, I don't know, I gave up on it).

      I basically try to forget it exists, as everyone should.

      Although not the most wonderful software in the world, Hangouts (neé Gtalk/Gchat/GoogleVoice) just works, and everybody with an Android phone (most people I know) has it as standard.

  68. Genuine confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google what now?

  69. "Yes, Minister" said it best by davecb · · Score: 1

    It's very Brave of you, Minister, to shut down a leading competitor to Facebook just when Facebook is getting into trouble with the courts. Giving up all that opportunity to "spend more time with your family".

    For people who didn't watch the British comedy, initiatives that would lose you elections were considered "brave", and anyone who got kicked out was "retiring to spend more time with their family".

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  70. Re: Oh God! Geocities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more concerned with the shutdown of Gmail annoucement. Born April 1, dead April 1.

  71. May I ask... by Denver_80203 · · Score: 1

    What is google+ ?

  72. Re:I'll miss it, esp. since they finally got it ri by dissy · · Score: 4, Informative

    G+ never had many users, so this will not cause a lot of harm.

    The only reason I even have a G+ account at all was due to the time they were forcing accounts on youtube.

    At the time they initially claimed it was just for the comment sections, so I ignored it since I don't comment.
    But for a short time they had some aggressive popup notices and wording that implied you would lose your subscriptions and custom saved playlists if you didn't upgrade.

    So yes G+ didn't have a lot of users, but it certainly had a whole lot of accounts made on threat of losing access to other services.
    I would only describe this as mildly annoying, but it seemed at the time that quite a number of people resented the forced signups.
    Even at only "mildly annoying", with not a single good thought about G+, that still ultimately sums up to a negative.

  73. Good question by DogDude · · Score: 2

    *how many more* of these are we going to have to have before people start to wake up?

    Good question. Why are you continuing to store important data on an advertising platform? Wouldn't it make more sense to spend $2-$5/month on your own email/doc storage? When are YOU going to wake up?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  74. I've never been a Google employee by ebh · · Score: 1

    ...so the demise of Google+ doesn't directly affect me. What are Google employees going to use in its place?

  75. gmail is next ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gmail closure and deletion is in the works too. Coming April 2 2020 ...

  76. Enough! by Bobrick · · Score: 1

    Why are we still talking about this? Just delete the whole goddamn thing and be done with it... who the fuck even used G+ in the first place?

    1. Re:Enough! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A lot of people. It was the best platform so social media if you liked to curate it.

      I organized a lot through g+ because it was trivial to do.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  77. Re: "i have over 50,000 messages..." by couchslug · · Score: 2

    Email loss wouldn't be catastropic if you have all that copied locally and backed up elsewhere.

    I use Thunderbird on my Linux installs to view my accumulated webmail accounts and keep local and archive copies. On Windows boxes I use Thunderbird Portable which makes backup even more convenient. I just backup the program folder instead of my profile. Either way it's easy to do. There's no excuse for not backing up important webmail. If I lose account access I lose no content and can immediately inform my contacts from the dead account of the change using another account.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  78. good riddance by cwatts · · Score: 1

    The only reason i signed up in the first place was so I could keep using youtube. I didn't then, and don't know, need another social media site. Plus, like nearly everything else google makes*, was a UI/IX train wreck. I don't think I ever used it other than to track someone down a couple times.

    csw

    * Google flights is an exception to this. They almost ruined it with their recent upgrade, but they have been tweaking it (and actually making it better) for a few months and it continues to be pretty great.

    --
    chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì
  79. Deletion Warning - Backup Everything Else Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure to backup all the rest of the data you have on Google services. I wouldn't be surprised if they accidentally deleted or disabled other content your Google+ account was linked to. That's what happened when they disabled your account, lets hope that doesn't happen when they delete the accounts.

  80. Re:gmail shutting down in 6 months; Didn't make mo by cwatts · · Score: 1

    Google translate doesn't suck either. Credit where credit is due!

    --
    chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì
  81. Attention economy ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... is a buzzword new to me of late and I think it's very descriptive of what happened to Google+.

    I have a set, fixed, amount of hours and minutes each day to do stuff. Google+ competed with TV, Facebook, forums, exercise, guitar playing and singing, photography and fiddling with computer shit (I'm retired IT).

    I have a Google+ account because I have legit and burner Gmail accounts, but I never posted a goddam thing.

    I can't say whether Google+ is a good witch or a bad witch.

    I was not willing and able to pay it any attention.

    DISCLAIMER: In my old age, I need glasses to read my desktop monitor. My Fitbit had a fit because I didn't see the "+."

    For a second, as I grabbed my glasses, I was all emotional because that evil fucking Google, in its entirety, was ending.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  82. Re: Oh Good! Trump Reelection! by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    I came here to say "Google plus will be deleted, and nothing of value was lost!", but it's already an actual tag on the post! I'm impressed, /.!

    In order to avoid the "Redundant" mod, I'll catch the Trump Train with this post and get my redundant "nothing of value was lost" post past the censor with Funny mods! I have the Karma to burn too. Can't stump the Trump!

    - Cromwell

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  83. sucks by geekoid · · Score: 2

    sucks, it was the best social media platform out there. It was so easy to curate, and create groups(circles) to maintain a sane feed.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  84. Google Cloud to go way of Google+ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The elevators where I work have a video new/infomercial service. For the past year the dominant sponsor has been AWS. The Day of the Google + death notice I started to see Google/Cloud commercials.

    Nuff said?

  85. Theory by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    Google is an odd company.

    They seem to have allocated their best people - coders, PMs, QA staff, designers - to their backend dev teams. Gmail, Google search, Youtube ... the server side is incredibly resilient, reliable, and high performance.

    Whoever was left over, they probably sent to the new products team.

    Whoever the new products team wouldn't take, they probably sent to their legacy apps/maintenance team.

    Whoever couldn't hack it there, they probably tried to dismiss.

    Whoever they couldn't dismiss, they probably sent to their UI team, where they're remained since.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  86. It's Dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duo will likely be shut down in 2019. Why? Because google.

  87. Circles was genius by Kevin108 · · Score: 2

    Being able to use Circles to easily steer conversations only to those contacts who would be interested, rather than spamming everyone's feed with everything, was an amazing feature. But great features don't mean anything if there's nobody around to use them with.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    1. Re:Circles was genius by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 2
      Agreed. Amazing that I read all the comments =>2 and saw only two mentions of the circles, which seemed brilliant to me. The ability to direct a post toward my family or my out of town friends or friends interested in linux or whatever seems absolutely necessary to making the thing usable.

      Circles took a tiny bit of effort to set up and maintain, but the payoff seemed huge. I was drifting toward biting the bullet and signing up for a FB account right when G+ was launched. The obvious superiority of the interface and capabilities compared to FB (as it seemed to me) convinced me just how terrible FB really is.

      In the end, the network effects killed it, I think. Many of my friends had G+ accounts, but they all also used their FB accounts to interact with family and other groups of people. While they may or may not have felt that G+ had technical advantages, it was not worth the effort to be simultaneously on FB and G+.

    2. Re:Circles was genius by cwatts · · Score: 1

      Circles? So what. Facebook has groups. Is there any difference?

      Anyone who says "circles are round" is dangerous and depraved and ought to be taken outside and shot!
      cw

      --
      chris watts íë¦ìS ì(TM)ì
  88. How about Discord? by Immerial · · Score: 1

    It's got wide platform support. No video chat but it does have voice and text chat.

    1. Re:How about Discord? by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      No video chat

      And there you said it.

      However since I don't often use video, it is one of the future options I'm considering. But then what do I do when I *do* want to use video?

  89. fucking spamtrap. Good riddance. by osee · · Score: 1

    Could not care less...
    It's been a cesspit of explicit and commercial spam for the last year or so.
    I left it before the announcement.

  90. I really don't care by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    I never really used it. It was pretty useless it seems to me.

  91. What is Google+? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering I never used it, I can hardly be upset by it's disappearance.

  92. I'm going to miss it. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    The UI was usable. Most of the forums I'm trying to use are terrible, and the others are not very popular.

    The dilution is unfortunate. I can't yet get the quality and volume of content I had on Google+, and it's going to be a while.

    Many of the forums I'm being encouraged to use are focused on free exchange, freedom from moderation. I'm blocking what I don't like, since censoring my own feed is my own choice. But it's nasty out there.

    All in all, Google will come back with another try at this. They just didn't want to fix Google+. They may want to be in the social media business.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  93. Re:Google+? What's that? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    What was Google +? It was like Fakebook, except NOT from FakeBook.

    Pretty much, and at the time of it going live Facebook had offended lots of people over something and they were looking for someplace else to go. It's big feature was the ability to organize you contacts in to groups and manage them that way. It was a feature that FB did not have at the time and even worked well with people who did not have G+ accounts as it worked off any email. However, it did not integrate with their calendar, and pretty much everybody using FB was using it to schedule, organize, and track events and group activities. Without that feature, it was DOA and everybody reverted back to using FB.