Slashdot Mirror
Apple Music Caught Censoring Pro-Democracy Music In China (gizmodo.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: Chinese journalists and netizens recently found that Apple Music's Chinese streaming service censored a song by Hong Kong singer Jacky Cheung that references the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests, an extremely politically sensitive topic for the Chinese Communist Party. The incident's 30th anniversary is coming up in June. Sophie Richardson, the China Director at Human Rights Watch, called the reported move "spectacularly craven." The Tiananmen protests are emblematic of a larger pro-democracy movement in China that was snuffed out by the Beijing government. Thousands of protesters were killed, but the exact numbers have themselves been censored by Chinese government officials.
Apple Music has also reportedly censored Anthony Wong and Denise Ho, two pro-democracy singers. After being noticed by Chinese netizens, the removals were reported by the Hong Kong Free Press and The Stand, two Hong Kong-based news outlets. Taiwan News also reported the censorship of Cheung's "Ren Jian Dao." The music remains available on Apple Music's North American products. "By removing a song referring the Tiananmen Massacre, @apple is actively participating in the Chinese Communist Party's agenda of scrubbing the colossal violations it has committed against the Chinese people from collective memory and rewriting history," tweeted Yaqiu Wang, a Chinese researcher with Human Rights Watch.
Apple Music has also reportedly censored Anthony Wong and Denise Ho, two pro-democracy singers. After being noticed by Chinese netizens, the removals were reported by the Hong Kong Free Press and The Stand, two Hong Kong-based news outlets. Taiwan News also reported the censorship of Cheung's "Ren Jian Dao." The music remains available on Apple Music's North American products. "By removing a song referring the Tiananmen Massacre, @apple is actively participating in the Chinese Communist Party's agenda of scrubbing the colossal violations it has committed against the Chinese people from collective memory and rewriting history," tweeted Yaqiu Wang, a Chinese researcher with Human Rights Watch.
Because nothing is more threatening to a walled garden.
Apple is not in the business of free speech, they're in the business of making money. If censoring one song means they can keep making money, they will.
Because if you can't attack peaceful people have people accept it as okay, you're just a business.
Thank you, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden and so many others, for courageously defending humanity, my freedom and more!
Left and right is a false dichotomy to drive divide-and-conquer so we fight each others instead of those who push this misdirection.
I am sure also apple music Germany is censoring selling pro nazi song sales. We may not like the law of *their* country, but apple has to respect local laws *where ever* it sells. It is pretty much so in every country that the law of the location of the buyer is the one which applies, not the law of the seller. If they don't want to respect the law of a country, the solution is simply : don't sell to anybody in that country. Many US outfit do that if you try to go to their site with an EU address they simply throw you out and say "GDPR we don't want you". Same principle.
C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
visit randi.org
and was curated for the Communist party.
Welcome to Communist censorship.
In free Taiwan the real China people can listen to music.
Recall the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests.
Talk about the history of Communist China.
Look at cartoon bears.
Read books like 1984.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Apple has a history of censoring content in its platforms. In this it seems that they're no different from many other major players. That's probably not surprising, given the symbiotic relationship between big corporations and governments. But there's an inconsistency here. On the one hand, Apple actively opposes US law enforcement's efforts to compromise users' private data. On the other hand, they seem to get behind censorship in a big way, sometimes even in support of totalitarianism.
People behave inconsistently - I guess entities that enjoy 'corporate personhood' exhibit similar behaviour.
'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
This article can be summed up with "company respects sovereignty of a country, and I'm outraged!"
Anyone doing business in China has to follow the laws, even if they don't align with the typical morals of the country where the business is based.
"Obey our laws or get out of China." It's just that simple.
TFA makes it sound like they have some magical 3rd choice and they're being evil for not "doing the right thing". It's pretty self-evident that they don't want to pack up and leave China, and removing a few songs from their store there (that are basically illegal to distribute in China) is a very small price to pay for them to stay in the market. Apple isn't above the law in China, they mow down large crowds of people trying to push this song's message, you don't think they will kick out Apple? This article is just trying to grab some headlines by reminding us that water is wet.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
Google complied with Chinese law by ceasing to do business in China. I imagine that opponents of censorship would prefer that Apple follow suit.
"An American international company CAUGHT following/respecting local laws in a country they do business!!!"
Could be rephrased:
"An American international company CAUGHT doing business in the first place in a country where local law requires violating human rights!!!"
Local laws and regulations require Censoring. Look at germany. Look at France. where certain historical items are not allowed for trade like nazi gear.
And even look at the US where you have to censor crypto when sold overseas. You used not to be able to advertise if you were a lawyer. You can't advertise cigarettes near schools and other venues for minors. You also can't sell certain drugs, not just illicit drugs, in the US that are legal in europe.
Ronald Reagan banned envionmentalists from canda (Farley Mowatt).
Countries ban things that offend their sensibilities.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
The Three T's and X were: Tibet, Tiananmen, Taiwan, and Xinjiang. It was made clear that we (the Westerners) had no knowledge or opinions on these topics. As such we have nothing to say about them.
One day a new assistant asked me about Tiananmen. I asked her what she knew. She told me that her history teacher told her that it was a beautiful park in Beijing where people fly kites. Her grandfather had told her something much more in line with what those of us who watched it life on TV saw.
I was not entirely sure about her at that point, so my answer to her was, "you should honour your grandfather."
She laughed and said, "that is so Chinese." However, she also understood my answer.
Only read your first sentence. There were no ethnic slurs, you lied because you can't help but be shit.
Look back over last 4 years and see EVERY liberal calling me a racist, bigot, homophobe and you not ONCE calling them out.
You are also shit. The DNC/liberals ARE the party of the KKK (see gov of VA) there is no debating it. You don't like being called shit or a racist, then don't support the KKK.
Don't support killing live born babes, don't support illegals killing US citizens and calling us racists for saying that is a bad stance. It did happen, San Francisco is PROTECTING the illegal alien that killed Kate Stynley and the DNC in Congress REFUSES to pass a law that might prevent it happening again.
This asshole calls out one side for pointing out his guys are shit and giving specific examples of why, but he gives a pass for years of name calling from him and his buddies.
Like I said... Liberals = shit
Q: How do you console a grammar nazi?
A: telnet there their they're
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Google complied with Chinese law by ceasing to do business in China. I imagine that opponents of censorship would prefer that Apple follow suit.
And then Google changed its mind and started making surveilance/censorship software for China. Google has also partnered with the Chinese government.