Slashdot Mirror


Killer Asteroid

Scott Manley writes "Astronomers have found a mile wide asteroid which has a non-zero possibility of hitting the earth i n the next century. Asteroid 1999 AN10 was found on 13th January '99 by the LINEAR system and scientists working in Italy have predicted a close approach in August 2027 and a potential collision in August 2039. This has been kept quiet after the panic last year over 1997 XF11 whic had a similar 'remote' possibility, if 1999 AN10 were to hit it would be a real civilisation killer. " I can't believe scientists are bothing with this stuff when we all know Y2k will kill us all in less than a year anyway.

221 comments

  1. Maybe we can steer it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...into Redmond.

  2. If you have enough time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fly in some thrusters wich accelerate piece's of asteroid to push it off course.

    Otherwise just throw as much at it as you can and hope the resulting pieces are small enough to let a serious amount to be burned up in the atmosphere?

  3. WTF, Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not true. If you could accurately calculate the necessary trajectory of the missile, all you'd have to do is launch it into spazce. Its momentum would get it there (eventually.) Then, all you'd have to do is set off the detonator. Rig it with a timer or something. Better yet, a proximity fuse. A mile in diameter is relatively small... a few 50 megaton bombs would take care of that...

  4. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not true

  5. Everyone that's worried about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. should pick up any number of Graham Hancock books. Each of them deal with theories of lost civilizations (both on Earth and Mars), that were apparently "wiped out" by.. (among other things) a giant asteroid.
    In "Fingerprints of the gods", he touches on many things mentioned here, such as the end of the mayan calender and the alighnment of the planets. He makes some interesting points, and there are a couple of good theories mixed in there (among the absurd).
    In another one.. "The Mars Mystery", he states that something to save earth from a planet-killing asteroid would take less than 20 years to develop.
    Hmm.. I wonder if they'd go Open Source.. the last thing we want to see on our only chance of survival is the Blue Screen O' Death(tm)

  6. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what disease?? every good one that comes along they find a cure for, except aids so far. damn it

  7. isnt 2039 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the last year for the UNIX based OS?? Y2K isnt much of a problem for it but its done after this year, anyone?

  8. 2038 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no. We're all going to die on Tuesday, January 19th, 2038.

  9. Call me demented.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're the one doing that!

    Damn you to hell. You know ever couple months I'll get a forwarded e-mail from one of my sisters or someone technologically illiterate about AIDS infected needles in Texas movie theaters or some such crap. I've always wondered who's been baiting all these gullible saps. So, it's you huh?

    Please, please stop!

  10. Coldness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It happens when it gets real cold outside.

  11. Windows already had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and Solaris, and...

    Most kernels keep track of the number of ticks expired since boot. For example, on a Solaris box, that happens 100 times a second. If they don't roll over properly, or if a critical comparison is made on a box that didn't roll over correctly, it's going to die. Not nearly as devestating as keeping track of milliseconds, granted. This rollover occurs slightly less often than every 3/2 of a year.

    The kernel variable in Solaris (Linux, too, I think, but I haven't checked the sources) is called 'lbolts'.

  12. In 2039 it'll be like swatting a fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there's some proverb about overconfidence that I don't remember, but I don't think I'm being overconfident when I say this:

    100 years ago people were fighting battles with muskets and rifles

    50 years ago and change the atom bomb was invented

    In 2039 we'll whip out our death ray and disintegrate the asteroid if it get's too close...it'll be like swatting a fly...

  13. What triggers ice ages in 100,000 year cycles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do Milankovitch orbital cycles work by themselves, or is there some 100,000 year resonance between Earth and PHAs? A 1km impact into open ocean would trigger an ice age by increasing Earth surface albedo due to extreme snowfall from evaporated seawater.

  14. Robert Heinlein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody remember the Heinlein story called "The Year of the Jackpot?" Where all these freaky human activities turn out to be periodic and they all peak at the same time, then the Soviets start WWIII, then the sun goes supernova and makes it all moot? Look at the headlines: Y2k approaching, Russians mad about Serbia, now doom is 40 years out.

    Heinlein was a genius.

    Dave T.

  15. Any particular reason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unix systems keep track of time as the number of seconds from Jan 1, 1970. On a 32 bit platform, this number will max out in 2038. 64 bit people will survive for somewhat longer.

  16. I'll sure the fool who tries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll sue the holy hell out of anyone who even thinks about aiming a death ray at the future sites of the Authur C. Clark L5 spaceport and Disney Orbit...
    Frankly, a near miss by an asteroid like that is as good of a boon for humanity's future as we could hope for, if we could slow the thing down and get it somewhere useful, like one of the Le Grange points, Geosynchronous Orbit over the equator, we'ld have lots of useful materials for space exploration and habitation waiting for us, right there. not to mention the fact that we could hollow the thing out and have one hell of a superstructure to build on.

    That's not a moon, that's a battlestation!

  17. ALARMISTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Jason, for quoting the most relevant excerpt from that paper. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for stepping up the search for potentially dangerous near-Earth asteroids. But this isn't one of them, and the paper was presented here in a sorry alarmist fashion.

  18. probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10% sounds a bit high, but is possible. However, from my involvement with wide-field astronomy (I work for an organization that builds instruments) I can say this: even if there was all-sky coverage, an asteroid wouldn't be noticed until too late. Astronomical observations, especially the bulk-imaging kind got from survey cameras, go onto tape and don't get reduced and analyzed immediately. Some observers don't get around to using their data for months or years. When the pictures _are_ analyzed, most of the analysis is looking at specific types of objects outside the solars system; asteroids show either as uninteresting point sources (if they're distant) or streaks that could be satelite or aircraft trails (if they're close and fast-moving).

    Astronomers doing extra-solar-system work - the vast majority - don't look for asteroids as it's hard, time-consuming and _not_ what they're paid for.

    If you want to find rocks, you need dedicated telescopes and cameras, specific software to do the searches and personnel paid to run those searches. It's not fair to blame the astronomical community in general for not finding asteroids.

  19. I hope Russian people calm Yeltsin down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems like when ever Yeltsin disagrees with the US, he first threatens nuclear force and then discusses the problem.

  20. It's all over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh... Except then the Zentraedi would come kick
    our asses too...

  21. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Losing 3 Days in each Earth rotation has retarded your mentality to stupid and an Education of Evil! TIME CUBE!

  22. I don't think Clinton wants to wait for Y2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clinton seems to have this master plan to piss the Russians off and start World War 3. Maybe he's just that angry about the whole Monica Lewinski thing. He's sitting there in the oval office, he hasn't had a blow job in months, he's getting pissed, and he's just looking for an excuse to start world war 3. Then NATO comes along with a convienent excuse by wanting to bomb Yugoslavia back into the stone age.

    Real soon now Yeltsin is going to get tired of rattling his sword and is actually going to start launching ICBMs. When that happens, 5 gets you 10 that Clinton goes on national television and says, "My fellow Americans... I hate you. I'm glad you're all going to die. Now I'm off to the Presidential bomb shelter, where I can live comfortably for the rest of my life. Have a nice nuclear disaster."

    It could happen...

  23. How?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be amazed what you can get out of emacs...

    M-x doctor

    Cheaper than a real therapist, and just as effective.

    (though I must admin, I'd like to know what's up with that Mayan calendar thing in emacs, too :-) )

  24. Sorry for the interruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops.. It appears Slashdot accidently picked up some interference from the EIBS radio network. We now return to regular programming where you could care less how many blowjobs the president got last year. Plus Clinton (or as you "moral" people call him, Klinton) will be out of office in a year anyways. Practice doing something else now so you won't be completely helpless when he leaves.

  25. Call me demented.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're demented.

  26. Half empty/Half full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the bright side, in forty years Microsoft will be squashed.

  27. Calanders... right date, wrong end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The epochs are fire/wind/water/quake.

    Fire epoch has already passed. This, the fourth and last is 4 "Ollin".
    Ollin is the aztech word for "movement"; the world will die in a giant quake.

    And it will re-start all over again with 5-fire, then 6-wind... and so on.

    However, I'll be too old (if survived) for such a nice show.

  28. Party at my place, August 10th, 2039 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CRAP! only 40 years to prepare. my plans of world domination (except for Luxemborg) and my 100 harems in each country (except for Luxemborg) must now be moved up. anyone know how i can contact the CEO of the people who make that macaroni stuff?

    ah... nevermind. computers can't calculate dates past the year 2037, rite? isn't it a coinkiedink that the projections put the asteroid to hit around that time, eh?!

    hey look at it this way, we'll be able to see binky gates dead before this thing hits.

  29. When the clock runs out - Macintosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, the clock on the latest version of MacOS runs out in 29,940. (The older versions ran out in 2038). Source: http://www.apple.com/about/year2000/

  30. probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " That's if I haven't died of sexual exhaustion (here's hoping), or more likely unfitness and cardiac arrest by then. "

    You said it my friend, you said it!

    Unfitness and cardiac arrest here I come baby!

  31. January 2038, I believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UseNIX calendars used to have this on them. There is a day in January marked as "End of Time, 2038" or something like that.

    Yet another reason to run NT. Time values are 64 bit. Lots and lots more headroom.

  32. just like humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans are like that. They spend tons on airport security, declaring war, and fighting crime, when the probability of dying of cancer or heart disease is infinitely higher.

    Humans want to fight bad guys, not unknowns or certainties.

  33. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets be fair. It's not as if they are the only ones doing Supposed harm. Look at the facts, and see that this country "United States" has done more to destroy, or rather its decendants, than the so-called Bothersome people of asia, india.

  34. Just as long as it's not all Bruce Willis again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear ya.... fucking horrible

  35. Important part == Resonant Returns theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The important part of Milani's paper was his theory of resonant returns. AN10 is a good example to test the theory, but the current estimated probability of impact with Earth in 2027 or 2039 is very low 10e-9. The point is asteroids can get locked into close approaching orbits to Earth.

  36. probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > a whole bunch of scientist people are being paid a lot of money to look into space and miss the obvious (like a big asteroid)

    Hah... they're not paid very much. The earth's asteroid early-warning system is woefully inadequate, and it's not their fault - the corrupt government + major corporations prefer profit-making ventures for investment, and happily spend billions on defense, while a few million goes the early warning network's way.

    All the money used to make disaster movies like Armegeddon would have paid for a kick ass asteroid defense network - but people are stupid. ( NB. kick ass relative to the current one - which has less spent on it than Armegeddon cost to make !!!)

  37. WTF, Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good one. How many millions of miles away is that asteroid? What's the current range on missles? It would cost billions to get them warheads up in space, each with the exact location of the asteroid, movement of the asteroid, etc. Does this seem like a good idea? I think not.

  38. In 2039 it'll be like swatting a fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An ex-roomie of mine did his masters thesis on this stuff. If we have five years to work with we can use a single megaton nuke and it'll miss us by 2 planetary diameters (50,000 miles/80,000 km). If we have *ten* years it'll miss us by 5 PD's.

  39. Windows already had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it happened after 497 days.
    10 times the interval of the Windows 98 crash,
    because Linux counts 10ms jiffies instead of
    the 1ms count in Windows.
    But it was fixed long ago.

  40. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, too bad this thing hasn't hit yet. Let's hope it ends up right on your head.

  41. Nah? Maybe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I.E. Jupiter sized asteriod would make one hell of an inpact.. "

    Yep. And there's lots of those around aren't there.

    Where's your brain man?

  42. Actually.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it's as nice as you describe here.

    Look out for Mother Nature. She's taking it back over and SHE IS PISSED

  43. we'll all be dead anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ancient inca prophecies say the world will end in 2018, and the incans have never been proven to be wrong.

    y'notice how after a certain amount of time, replies to /. start following a certain pattern? first, since everything original has been said already but there's so many posts people don't read them all before posting more, people start repeating things that they didn't notice had already been said. Plus, since there are so many other posts, the later ones don't get read or replied to. It's interesting. But basically if you post to a story with more than 120 replies, you're wasting your time.

  44. This sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the article, I realize that not only are we not all going to die in 2027, but the probability is 1.2% that this asteroid will come within the orbit of the moon. This really sucks.

  45. 2077 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    September 11th, 2077. Paduna, Verona and Venice all gone, and some 600.000 dead. Long live ACC, the one true prophet :)

  46. I hope Russian people calm Yeltsin down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, he can't threaten the US of an economic embargo, right ? "What ? No more caviar ?". The only thing that still works in Russia is the nuclear weapons (well, some might not be really working anymore but we don't need all of them to work...). Eltsin has to keep those kind of lines because he has to show Russians that other countries still respect and fear Russia. Nobody likes to see his/her president asking for help and food to other nations.

  47. Run Windows/NT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On NT, time values are all 64 bit values. They're also much finer grained resolution than 1 second intervals, but even so, it'll be many more thousands of years in the future before those run out.

  48. thank "heavens" for the atari 2600. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all this talk makes me want to play some asteroids. *grin*

  49. -=CALENDARS=-, not 'Calanders' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ubiquitous spell-checker: The 'Killer App' for Linux

  50. Our Glorious Starfleet has Destroyed the Comet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the only question is whether to use the Meklars' superior production tecniques to get the ships up there fast, or to use the Mrrshans' superior gunnery skills to have a better chance of destroying the thing.

    1. RE: Our Glorious Starfleet has Destroyed the Comet by sCreeD · · Score: 1

      (ROTFL)
      Damn! And I justed was about to upgrade to mass
      drivers!!! Damn, damn, damn!


  51. music to die by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has someone informed Aerosmith of this? They'll need alot of lead time to write the soundtrack for it.

  52. good timing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    atleast we won't have too much to worry about... with the 32bit int clocks timming out about then, maybe the second the clock runs out the astriod will hit... two problems in one stone..

  53. I'd kill myself first.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let Tricky make the damned soundtrack! :)

    It's all good.

    -ad

  54. Nah. What about other planets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This "planets are going to align" thing is total B.S. Ain't gonna happen. And if they did, you wouldn't notice.

    If another planet get hit, telescopes trained on it might see a flash and clouds, and there might be a minescule increase in the amount of debris flying around, but otherwise we wouldn't notice. Planets are big suckers; their orbit wouldn't be affected by a simple comet / asteroid hit.

  55. Related web pages... and map showing its position. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good links there thanks.

    I liked the nasa quotes on explorezone.

    "the most dangerous asteroids are extremely rare"
    -how about those in the not-quite-most-dangerous category ?

    "Asteroids that large strike Earth only once
    every 1,000 centuries on average"
    -on average ?

  56. What triggers ice ages in 100,000 year cycles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Any ice age that would occur after an impact would have more to do with the cloud cover brought about by all that seawater in the atmosphere--the whole "nuclear winter" concept.


    There's an interesting theory that major impacts act as a nudge to change the Earth's rotational rate very slightly, which propogates to the core in ~1000 years and messes up the convection enough to trigger a switch in the magnetic poles.

  57. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this one pans out. Would be a wonderful boost for the space industry if suddenly we had 40 years to develop our space tech enough to stop a rock. Look what we did in a handfull of years back in the 60s.

    'Not because it easy but because it is hard.'

  58. Mayan: "Heck, we don't need to go past..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Mayan cobol programmer: "Heck, we don't need to go on forever, besides, we're running out of room to write."

    (800 years later)

    "Oh, no! The mayan calander ends at 12/23/2012!"


  59. This sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, more than 1.2% of people die "before the expected time". Car accident, aids or other diseases, guns (in the US), domestic accident ("no need to unplug it, it will only take a second to fix"). Humans are like lemmings, many of them dies but most of them makes it.

  60. Clocks, Mayan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know our *clocks* all end a midnight?

    WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!! AUGH!!!

    And you know those ancient stories about the earth being square... well if you sail west of out California your longitude will hit 180 West... and go no further!

    YOU'LL SAIL OFF THE EARTH AND YOU'LL DIE!!! AUGH!!!

    Now, what was that you were saying about the Mayan calendar? It's not just the emacs manuals that debunk this myth; I've seen comments in several "new age" publications which make mine look like acts of grandmotherly kindness. In those circles (pun intended), the Mayan calendar disaster crowd is about as welcome as the "Star Trek rulz!" crowd at a discussion of Robert Heinlein & Frank Herbert.

  61. Windows already had this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That "patch" to fix windows hanging after 49.7 days of uptime was something like this. They were using a 32-bit millisecond counter which overflowed after 49.7 days. I guess their systems were never tested to be running for that long.

  62. Killer Intellect on the loose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are trolling, try alt.fun. Otherwise, you really should read the question in the first article of this thread before posting a reply.

  63. non-zero possibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I should to actually make an effort to learn how quantum physics works, but...
    Isn't there also a fairly small but non-zero possibility that, for example, the earth will appear in the middle of the sun tomorrow morning?
    In other words, does this mean anything?

  64. Mayan Calender by PHroD · · Score: 0

    Yeah i seem to remember that the Mayan calander predicted the destruction of the worls or something simila, a couple or 3 decades into the next century (as stated several comments above)

    "We're all gonna DIEEEEEEEEE" - Beavis

  65. Just as long as it's not all Bruce Willis again by snuh · · Score: 0

    Geez. If the krew from Deep Impact or Asteroid appear, I'll kill myself first. Talk about horrible movies.

  66. Nah? Maybe! by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    Well depending on how big this thing is... I.E. Jupiter sized asteriod would make one hell of an inpact.. All that gravity and it's high speed and.... You get the idea..

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  67. Finally get what's comin to us... by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    I thought this places was already 'lifeless'...heh

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  68. WTF, Eh? by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    Ok.. Umm.. 40 years.. Why don't we start shooting of our old warheads at it now, and minimal damage from it.. Oh well I guess that would be a good idea, soo good we wont do it..

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  69. What about other planets? by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    Still give a good reason to use the pick up line:We don't if we will be alive tommorow.......

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  70. Call me demented.... by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    Would of been a good March 32nd joke..

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  71. Calanders (haha) by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    I can imagine it now.. Like they have holidays marked on the calender, they would have marked on one of the day 'The day you die'..

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  72. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    We do have a way.. It's called disease..

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  73. I'll never get any money by CrazySailor · · Score: 0

    out of my retirement system then!

    --
    -- Improve Windows - Buy a Mac!
  74. Our Glorious Starfleet has Destroyed the Comet by NightParrot · · Score: 0

    Experienced Master of Orion players know what must be done.

  75. logic by xpunter · · Score: 0

    that's beautiful

  76. Not just unix by Erich · · Score: 1

    Not just unix... any machine or program that uses a 32 bit time_t based on Jan 1 1970 will die. And that includes many programs and OS's besides just unix. The difference is, we unix folk know it's coming.

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

  77. 2038 by KingKurly · · Score: 1

    Now that's freaky, because Jan 19 is my birthday... 2038 is my...55th birthday. Hm, hopefully i'll die of something before then :)

    --
    It was recently discovered that research causes cancer in rats.
  78. "Siz of Texas" by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

    Ouch, and doen't a shotgun do more damage than a similar sized ball? Blowing up an asteroid is not the solution. Redirecting it might help.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  79. "Siz of Texas" by John+Campbell · · Score: 1

    Actually, breaking an asteroid into smaller chunks would help, at least for things smaller than Texas. If we got hit with a single rock a mile in diameter, it'd still be a single rock close to a mile in diameter when it hit the ground. If we got hit with the same mass in inch-diameter pebbles, it'd mostly burn up in the atmosphere. It's a matter of friction and surface-area-to-volume ratios.

    Of course, for something the size of Texas, even if we could hit it hard enough to break it up, it'd be breaking up into the mile-wide chunks mentioned above, and getting hit with a bunch of those versus getting hit with a single Texas-sized rock is pretty much a tossup. Even a single mile-wide rock is a planet-killer, anyway.

  80. I have an idea... by John+Campbell · · Score: 1

    When it comes by on the first pass, let's fly up to meet it. We can plant a colony on its surface, and they can make it habitable and build some big ol' engines or a solar sail or something on it, so when it comes around on the second pass, they can nudge it into Earth orbit.

    Viola! Planet-destroying disaster averted, one new satellite acquired. It'd be much safer than trying to blow the thing up, or redirect it out of the solar system... you never know where it (or its pieces) are going to end up a couple dozen orbits down the road when you do something like that. And we could use it for a space station (because the ISS probably still won't be finished by then), or even plant some equipment on it to scan the nearby sky and have it search for planet-destroying asteroids. Would seem fitting. :)

  81. Not a hardware issue. by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    Running an Alpha has nothing to do with it. x86 CPUs can have 64-bit integral types just as well as Alpha CPUs can. After all, the original 32-bit time_t ran on 16-bit CPUs (and even some 8-bit ones). So, theoretically, there could be Alphas with a 32-bit time_t (with old libraries) or 486s with a 64-bit time_t (with new libraries).

  82. Windows already had this problem by Enry · · Score: 1

    In Linux, they're called 'jiffies' and they used to expire after about 4 years, but I think it's fixed now.

  83. Ever read "The Marchin Morons"? by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Nino the Mind Boggler:

    Sounds like you might have. So if this doesn't pan out, we'll just convince them that Venus is the place to be, right?

  84. Why worry? by Matt+Blevins · · Score: 1

    Obviously we must divert all our energies into life-extension technology.

  85. side topic: the Y2038 problem. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    People have been bringing up the Y2038 32-bit time_t problem in this thread. It's not a problem. Making an integer contain more bits in a program is much much easier than altering the number of characters in a string (the two-digit y2k problem). The ramifications are smaller. We won't be seeing the kinds of trillion-dollar (I say "trillion" because I am predicting for inflation and speaking in 2038 dollars) problems that y2k gives. For the software, a recompile with a bigger time_t fixes everything. For the data files, there's a bit more work, but not much.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  86. I have an idea... by Jarl · · Score: 1

    And how much energy would we need to brake its orbit? I realize we don't have to actually stop it, only align it with earths orbit, but I'd hate to have to do an athmosperic brake sequence with this one.

    A few decades with some serious mass slingers might help adjust its trajectory though.

  87. Actually.... by mackga · · Score: 1

    the y2k thingy is just the start: civ as we know it begins to collapse; people go mad because their computers and toasters and teevees and air conditioning/heating units stop working, but slowly, not all at once - you see the pattern? Banks begin to fail, people get laid off; the UN passes a global non-smoking law; airplanes fall randomly out of the sky; the weather gets worse - more frequent and stronger hurricanes in the atlantic; bigger cyclones in the pacific; monster tornadoes in the great plains, volcanic erruptions all along the pacific rim; California drops into the ocean - oh, well, the news ain't all bad! Bill Gates runs for and wins the U.S. presidency and is re-elected 4 times - after changing all the rules. By this time, the remaining 300-400 million people are in despair, wandering around with Palm Pilots that won't work any more - no more batteries for them. Then the asteroid comes and puts them out of their collective misery.

    Remember, you heard it here first!

    --

    "shop smart:shop s-mart" ash

  88. Finally get what's comin to us... by Danse · · Score: 1

    Really, if the world can't get its act together in the next 25 to 40 years, at least enough to stop a big rock from annihilating life as we know it, then we probably deserve to get wiped out by an asteroid. Then in another few billion years, new life will emerge and try to create a new society without falling into the trap of creating lawyers or politicians. Or then again, the world could just become a lifeless hunk of rock like the moon. Either way, the universe will probably benefit from it. Think of it as survival of the fittest. If we can prevent ourselves from being killed, then we deserve to live. If not, then the big rock will get to make its opinion of us known.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  89. Any particular reason? by Don+Negro · · Score: 1

    Or are you just making shit up?

    Just curious.

    Mike

    --

    Don Negro
    Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

  90. Mayan Calender by Don+Negro · · Score: 1

    It's either December 24, 2012, or December 12, 2024.

    Or I could be wrong all together, but those are the choices that seem most plausible.

    Don Negro

    --

    Don Negro
    Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

  91. Any particular reason? by Don+Negro · · Score: 1

    Duh. [Feeling like an idiot.]

    Don Negro

    --

    Don Negro
    Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

  92. Physics by Misfit · · Score: 1

    Great, I hope it hits. I'll finally be able to see how close to reality the special FX were in last year's two asteroid movies.

  93. probably not by Phil-14 · · Score: 1
    Hah... they're not paid very much. The earth's asteroid early-warning system is woefully inadequate, and it's not their fault - the corrupt government + major corporations prefer profit-making ventures for investment, and happily spend billions on defense, while a few million goes the early warning network's way.

    To speak in the military's defense... they want to be involved in both asteroid defense and developing significant new technologies; this has been opposed by the Clinton administration. The military only gets something like 1/6 of the federal budget, and it's been going down through Clinton's whole administration. His "who are we going to declare war on this week" habits have only made preparedness, and money for tech development, even more scarce.

    A lot of the criticism you made of the military can be placed firmly at its commander-in-chief, who we were stupid enough to elect. We get a chance to get a new one at the end of next year. If we're not all killed by Y2K, that is.
    Phil Fraering "Humans. Go Fig." - Rita

    --
    (currently testing something about signatures here)
  94. "Siz of Texas" by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    Oh ya, and THAT was an acurate portrayal.. ;-P

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  95. Yep, and if you missed that needle in the haystack by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 1

    Do you have ANY idea how hard it is to track something that small millions of miles away in some cases?

    'Oh ya, I can see it right there, bob!! What, you can't see it? It's that little .00001 micron spec on the horizon..'

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  96. Update 21 Apr. 1999 by jnik · · Score: 1
    In case anyone still cares:
    • The paper had been peer-reviewed before posting on the site
    • The publicization all came from a third party who happened to find the page; authors were not consulted
    • Independent confirmation sets probability of impact in 2039 at approx. 1 in 1 billion
    • Asteroid will be easily observable again in a few months, so orbital parameters can be narrowed down and more accurate prediction released
    • Was not publicized in order to prevent overreaction and to await verification in a few months.
    Source: Paul W. Chodas, Research Scientist, NEO Program office
  97. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by nstrug · · Score: 1

    Wrong again. My mother is French and half my family live in France. Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  98. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by nstrug · · Score: 1

    And you're an ignorant racist idiot. If you want to cut down on pollution you have to look no further than North America and Europe---we are responsible for the vast majority of pollution. If you want to cut down on pollution, walk or cycle to work instead of sitting your fat arse behind a steering wheel, don't keep your house so hot in the winter and so cool in the summer and try to eat less meat. It's simple really. Oh, and try to watch your mouth. Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  99. probably not by Psion · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, prijks, McDonald's spends more on a single restaurant each year than is spent by the entire planet in the search for earth-crossing asteroids.

  100. January 2038, I believe by Zyber · · Score: 1

    I agree. When NT is not in the process of rebooting or getting ready to need rebooting it tracks time perfectly. :P

  101. non-zero possibility? by dsfox · · Score: 1

    Its smaller than fairly small.

  102. Posting patterns and big rocks in the sky... by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    2300 hours EDT? I'm ususlly running a game around then...Could you make it 2330 hours? We usually wind down by then

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  103. Side topic: Is Slashdot y2k compliant by evilandi · · Score: 1


    Having a two-digit year does not necessarily make something non-Y2K compliant.

    To be non-compliant you'd need to DO something with the two-digit year which would create a problem; eg. compare two values, keep adding values etc. If the code doesn't manipulate the data you don't have a problem (other than stupid users, which is another story altogether).

    If 99 is just a tag for this current year, and the next year is tagged as 00, and no code tries to presume any kind of numerical order, it's not a problem. You could just as well tag this year as "Bob" and next year as "Fred".



    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  104. When the clock runs out by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    why 32 bits? it depends on the compiler and especially the library... nothing to do with hardwarearchitecture... if you only use time functions in the library to manipulate your time variable then you are safe, if you do arithmetic on it and the time_t is not an integer you're making bad things :o)
    anyway 32 bits or not, if someone want to put a double or a char structure or whatever in the library for the time_t and you ONLY use time function from this library it'll work!
    --

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  105. When the clock runs out by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

    why 32 bits? it depends on the compiler and especially the library... nothing to do with hardware architecture... if you only use time functions in the library to manipulate your time variable then you are safe, if you do arithmetic on it and the time_t is not an integer you're making bad things :o)
    anyway 32 bits or not, if someone want to put a double or a char structure or whatever in the library for the time_t and you ONLY use time function from this library it'll work!
    --

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  106. Cinco de mayo? by Pascal+Q.+Porcupine · · Score: 1

    No quiero Taco Bell. Yo quiero Amasita's. (Amasita's es un poco restaurante Mexicano que es cerca del laboratorio del sciencia computacion. Sus enchiladas queso con chile rojo son MUY delicioso, y son borrachos!)
    ---
    "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.

    --
    "'Is not a quine' is not a quine" is a quine.
    Quine "quine?
  107. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Too bad this thing isn't hitting now. Let's hope it smacks SE Asia or India. Too many people and, damn, do they pollute.... Then again, maybe we can line up all the trash in this country and have them wait in that special place! We need something to wipe out half the people on this planet. We're doomed one way or another. A plague or other disaster would do the world a lot of good.

  108. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    Relax, junior. CAn't take much sarcasm and dark humor, huh? Besides, you obvioulsy missed the part about getting rid of all the trash (i.e. white trash) and placing them in ground zero.
    You did make me remember one other point. Wouldn't it be great to see it hit France???????
    And, btw, I bike quite a lot and do my fair share of pollution prevention and cleanup.....

  109. Gamma Ray Bursters... Linux Leading Research by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    Yeah - 23 January this year there was a big one - the estimated energy release was equivalent to converting twice the mass of the sun into energy.

    This was the first GRB to be observer in the optical during the burst - they build a special fast tracking telescope that could point anywhere on the sky in 3 seconds.

    Best bit is.... the computer hardware running this is running linux.

  110. Give them free time on a Community Beowulf by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    We're wprking on the subject... but the limitation is the observations...

  111. "Siz of Texas" by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    Ahhh... slight problem is that all that kinetic enery that the asteroid has is still contained in all those pebbles.

    So all that energy is conveniently dumped into the atmosphere, superheating hte air and turning the air into an oven.

    Rememebr the second fragment in deep impact? Rememebr it getting broken up?
    Rememebr everyone escaping into the mountains?


    Now imagine everyone spontaneously combusting due tot he heat in the air .... imagine all teh forests cathing fire.... imagine all teh ozone being destroyed... imagine the real nuclear winter afterward

    ;-)

  112. hell yeah! by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    Hey - read 'Nemesis' by Bill Napier - same idea - a High Tech Thriller - and the only work of fiction to mention linux. (except for MS press releases)

  113. Spaceguard needs Money! by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    Hardly - in the UK we've been trying to get the UK to spend 10 million pounds over the next 10 years for a telescope and centre to look for the killer rock.

    How many cruise missiles to lauch against serbia does that buy you? 5?

    LINEAR and NEAT are the only government funded programmes, NEAT isn't really up to the task, and there are persistent rumours of LINEAR restricting information.
    And they're both in the USA - so when it's daytime there nobody is looking.

  114. Related web pages... and map showing its position. by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    explorezone.com has a news article on this which includes and interview with the astronomers.

    My map of Near Earth Objects has 1999 AN10 marked on it, and will be updated daily. It's Currently the red object near mercury.

    And Benny Peiser's Cambridge Conference network mailing list broke the news of this to it's readers - readers like Arthur C Clarke, Bill Napier, Mark Bailey and other big names in the field.

  115. lets solve this problem by parallax · · Score: 1

    The problem is that there is a significant chance that an extinction-class impact will happen within our lifetimes. The chance isn't large, but it has been calculated by astronomers to be approximately equal to the chance of the average person dying in a commercial airline crash.

    The number of people actively engaged in looking for these killer rocks is fewer than the number of people who work in your local McDonald's. That's the _global_ total.

    The reason for this is a lack of funding. It is pure coincidence that this particular rock was observed; the number of known-trajectory asteroids is small compared to the total number in the solar system, and most of the sky is unwatched most of the time.

    That's why the chance of this asteroid hitting us on a near approach is about the same as being hit by one we haven't observed.

    Lots of governments spend lots of money ensuring airline safety. I don't have the numbers at hand, but it is my understanding that a fairly comprehensive sky survey would cost significantly less.

    Personally, I'd feel awfully silly being killed by a rock we could have nudged in a different direction with a few years of warning. If we discover one with only a few months of lead time, NASA says we're pretty much screwed.

    --
    parallax
  116. 2038 by PD · · Score: 1

    Even freakier, I dated three different women who had birthdays on January 19th. Then I wised up and my wife's birthday is January 17th.

    I like to think that the course of my life has been completely determined by the birthday paradox.

  117. Like Dave Barry sez: by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Just have the nurse roll my wheelchair over to the window of the Old Fogies home so I can watch it happen.

    Chuck (40+ and lovin' it)...

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  118. probably not by prijks · · Score: 1

    ok, but for an undiscovered asteroid to hit us any given day (say tomorrow) it would mean that asteroid is really fast, or a whole bunch of scientist people are being paid a lot of money to look into space and miss the obvious (like a big asteroid)

    hmmm... then again, i know more of coding than i do of astronomy, so i'll be quiet now...

  119. thank "heavens" for the atari 2600. by Freshman · · Score: 1

    I used to have one of those!
    But the damn joysticks kept jamming :P

    --

    ----------
    "They misunderestimated me." --George W Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
  120. Close.. by Freshman · · Score: 1

    Sunday, December 23rd, 2012, Approx noon (don't know where they got noon from)

    The video's I saw on this said that according to the Mayan's, time just "stops" or something here.

    The end of the world better be more exciting than that!

    --

    ----------
    "They misunderestimated me." --George W Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
  121. non-zero possibility? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's smalled then smaller then smaller then fairly small. It might even be smaller.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  122. Calanders by tomwhore · · Score: 1

    When does the UNix Clock run out?

    And when is the end of the Mayan calander?

    It would be interesting to see if the intersect with this rock.

    Soem one call up Bruce willis and that Liv Tyler babe, they ned to make a sequal..

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  123. probably not by TaoJones · · Score: 1
    Or the gamma ray burst from a quasar on the edge of the universe.

    That one did get my attention. So besides the known big bad nasties out there, there are a lot more bigger, badder, nastier ones we have no clue about...

    fun thought ;)

    --
    "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
  124. hell yeah! by 8Complex · · Score: 1

    hey bill... did you order a planet-killing asteroid lately?

    8Complex

  125. sydney hailstorm! the heavens open... by Enthrad · · Score: 1

    April! April! I mean!

  126. sydney hailstorm! the heavens open... by Enthrad · · Score: 1

    Hail? In March? It was nice and sunny in Adelaide today. Weird.

  127. When the clock runs out by loki7 · · Score: 1

    Oops! I replied to the wrong article. I was pointing out that DEC Unix does indeed have this problem. A previous poster claimed that Alpha's were immune.

    peter

  128. When the clock runs out by loki7 · · Score: 1

    Not if you're running DEC Unix. Don't know about Linux, but sizeof(time_t) is 4 on DEC Unix.

    peter

  129. When the clock runs out by loki7 · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm mistaken (and I very well may be) I believe that POSIX requires that time_t be an integral data type, and that it represent the number of seconds since 1970. OS/2 used^Hs a double for time_t, but it's not POSIX.

    So anyone working with POSIX systems only is justified in treating time_t like a number.

    You certainly couldn't use a structure, since time_t is defined to be an arithmetic type by the ANSI C spec.

    peter

  130. Asteroid calving/deflection by DHartung · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent point that wasn't handled as well as possible in both last year's movies. Actually, Armageddon, Deep Impact, Meteor, and NBC's Asteroid all depicted so-called 'calving' of the object so that there are lots of smaller impacts, but none of them specifically blamed the efforts of humans for this.

    In fact, the best way to handle an incoming asteroid is to deflect it into a non-Earth-crossing orbit. Note that the best such orbit is off the solar system plane, so "up" or "down" is better than "left" or "right" deflections. And the earlier you do this deflection, the less energy required for it to be successful. If we find an asteroid early enough (and yes, we are talking on a multi-decade scale here), it's possible that a modest ion engine like on the Deep Space 1 mission could do everything required, with no blasting at all.

    But you have to start early, so no complaining about this being yadda years in the future.

    --
    lake effect weblog
    {Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
  131. Does this mean more awful movies ? by Foddrick · · Score: 1

    Surely this will spawn a couple more movies about heroic Americans saving the earth from a terrible. No other country is capable of movie-heroism.

  132. Pessimists! This is a great opportunity!! by devinjones · · Score: 1
    Forget about near misses!! This is our chance to capture an asteroid. Put the sucker in an elliptical orbit circling the Earth-Moon system and start the mining operations.

    Once we demonstrate the value of finding and capturing near earth asteroids, we will get a lot more eyeballs looking for them. We also get to practice rendevouing and redirecting them, so when the real doomsday rock comes, it can be diverted and turned into an asset not a disaster.

    We have 39 years in which to create viable rocket systems. Let's get started.

  133. Call me demented.... by SimJockey · · Score: 1

    But the first thing that crossed my mind was to copy the text, change the dates to this year or next, and send it off to some of my less science literate friends.

    It was in the internet, it has to be true. (You should see the fun I have with doctored press releases, put Reuters or AP at the beginning of any bit of text and people will believe nearly anything.) ;-)

    --
    Laugh while you can, monkey boy!
  134. This is all your fault! by John+Hays · · Score: 1

    If you had only listened to your mother. If only you had lived your life right, ate the proper food, read the right books, went to church and stopped playing with yourself.

    But nooooooooo...
    You had to play the rebel and now the whole planet has to pay for your mistakes.

    Well, I hope your satisfied.

    --
    I'm sure they meant well. So did the makers of Thalidomide.
  135. Collision: January 19, 2038 I predict!!! by BitMan · · Score: 1

    Coincides with the nice signed 32-bit POSIX/C overflow of 99.9% of the world's systems. :->

    --
    -- Bryan "TheBS" Smith
    Independent Author, Consultant and Trainer
  136. About the alignment of planets.... by Grond · · Score: 1

    Well, I am doubtful regarding the necessity of this post, but, with regard to whomever seems to think that the alignment of the planets is an important event, I am wont to state that even if the 6 planets outside of Earth's orbit aligned with the Earth (i.e., such that the pull of Mercury and Venus would not counteract them), then their combined gravitational pull could be negated by sitting down (well, lowering yourself about a foot closer to the Earth, anyway).
    And as to another planet 'bumping' into us because of an asteroid impact, it would indeed need to be a massive asteroid, given that with the exception of Pluto, the orbits of the planets in our solar system do not appear to be particularly elliptical or perturbed, even given something like 10 billion years of bombardment by asteroids and comets.

  137. You know, I think you may need some help.. by Hanzie · · Score: 1

    Duh,

    Who do you think he is? He's not a shrink, he's the sniper.

    He's just trying to flush his victim out.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  138. Do I smell old movies? by Hanzie · · Score: 1

    Actually it HAS happened. One off the Yucatan 65e10^6 yrs ago, hudson bay, gulf of mexico, and probably a few others.

    Hell, there was even a small one in Russia in about 1912.

    It will happen again.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
  139. Let's make a movie by LoRider · · Score: 1

    I have an idea, let's make a movie about an astroid that is going to kill everyone that is left over after the y2k bug killed most of us. We can have Jon Katz write a book about it first then of course make it into a movie. That is the year that all the 32-bit unix systems will die right. Isn't that also the year when evidence that has been sealed by the Warren commission will be released about the JFK killing. It is going to be an exciting year. I will be 66 years old and wont even know my own name much less care about any of this, I will have had my brain fried from reading Slashdot for 40 years and slashdot's subliminal messaging will have taken it's toll on my sanity.

    Keep up the good work.

    --
    LoRider
  140. Calanders by fordp · · Score: 1

    The UNIX clock on 32bit systems dies sometime in 2038.

    The Mayan calendar is divided into four or fixe epochs all of which end in MOST life on our planet dieing out. (Think the great flood)

    The last epoch, the epoch of the sun/fire ENDS on December 23rd 2012 when we all meet our firey doom.

    There is no epoch after this. This is the end.

    I'm glad I could make your day brighter. :)


  141. Windows already had this problem - check this out by El+Guapo · · Score: 1

    Im performing an experiment on my laptop (Dell Latitude LX4100D) to take windows to the 49.7 day mark. Im already up to 34 days. Check out the page here.

    Its got an uptime counter on it, as well as a research-paperesque introduction page.

    -----------------------------------
    Whats so hot about chili?

  142. When the clock runs out by fishCannon · · Score: 1

    2037-2039!!! Isn't that about when the clocks run out?

  143. January 2038, I believe by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    While I may be running a particular app in 2038, I seriously doubt i'll be running NT v4.0, or my current linux which only does 32bit, or even a 32-bit cpu.

  144. optimist by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    What an optimist. You'll probably be hit by a bus tomorrow!

  145. You know, I think you may need some help.. by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

    He daren't go out. He'll get killed!

  146. Maybe we can steer it by blankley · · Score: 1

    No, you'll hit my car...

    --
    Open source means never having to say thank you.
  147. Solaris already had this problem by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

    Has that been fixed in 2.6? I hope so...

    --
    Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  148. Do I smell old movies? by Shadow+Knight · · Score: 1

    Watch out for that inverse error (or whichever logical fallacy this is). Just because it happened in a movie doesn't mean it can't happen in real life too. Of COURSE, it's not any more or less likely to happen because they made a movie about it than if they hadn't!

    --

  149. That episode of Star Trek: TNG by Evro · · Score: 1
    Does anybody remember the episode where there was an asteroid headed for a planet, and they were trying to tractor-beam the thing off course, and somebody suggested blowing up the asteroid, but Data said that all that would do is disintegrate the asteroid, but it would still have the same mass except be made up of tons of smaller particles? That seemed to make sense to me, and contradicts the two horrible movies of this summer. Of course, I don't usually base my opinions on TV, but the point seems valid. So we can't blow it up, what the hell could we do?

    Deep Impact was much worse than Armageddon, I thought. Everybody died except the people I had hoped would

    -Begin Evan's Dumb Signature.....

    --
    rooooar
  150. GOOD!!! TOO MANY DAMN PEOPLE!!! by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

    Wow, I guess that other posting about hackers being anti-social misfits was right - you sure seem to prove the point.

    --
    Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  151. Do I smell old movies? by redskater · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or have we seen this crap in old movies such as: Armageddon, Deep Impact, and so on? Why do we worry it won't happen.

    --
    either we are networking or we areNT networking
  152. non-zero possibility? by decowski · · Score: 1

    i would say that it is even smaller than smaller than fairly small

  153. probably not by Frater+Reklaw · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing a stat that at any given time, only 10 percent of the sky is being observed. (Sorry, no source). Not much money is spent on this.

    --
    The search effects the results.
  154. It's all over. by RPoet · · Score: 1

    Here's the timeline:
    Mid-1999 - 3rd WW breaks out.
    January 1, 1900 - Nuff said.
    2039 - End Of The World As We Know It (if not for the comet, then for the UNIX clock).

    These are exciting times.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  155. Windows already had this problem by CmdrMurph · · Score: 1

    It's fixed by a patch to 2.4. From memory, 2.5 onwards are not vulnerable.

  156. Side topic: Is Slashdot y2k compliant by CmdrMurph · · Score: 1
    It occurred to me that our favourite news service might be out of action for reporting whatever chaos results from y2k:

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/04/13/191123 7

    Call me paranoid, but that looks awfully like a 2 digit year embedded in that URL...

  157. Side topic: Is Slashdot y2k compliant by CmdrMurph · · Score: 1

    Yes, I agree, but anywhere I see 99 sets the alarm bells going.

    It's certainly quite plausible in the context of Slashdot that it's just a tag. The trouble with using 2 digit year tags is that someone somewhere will make a coding goof, even if it's not the original author. Eg, what if one of the perl libraries involved converts 2000 into 100 rather than 00, and some other piece of code relies on the tag being 2 characters (could be ok if it just takes the last 2 characters of the conversion).

    perl is y2k safe, and 99 may just be a tag, but there is still space in there for something to get upset/confused.

  158. Why worry? by ccordero · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry too much...

    We have Bruce W.

    wait a minute will he still be alive then???

    ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    c.

  159. oppressive government rule by sudama · · Score: 1

    I'm personally far more worried about spending the rest of my life under opressive government rule (like 99% of the world's past denizens have spent their lives)

    Not to mention a similar portion of the world's current population living under such conditions...

    --
    -- Adam
  160. Mayan Calender by Goatbert · · Score: 1

    12-24? Now come on, they wouldn't pick for the world to end on Christmas Eve, that'd just be mean. Hehe.

  161. Mayan Calender by ordu · · Score: 1

    The calender resets december 21st 2012 :)

    Or so says the maya cosmogenesis 2012 book.

    --
    -- "Religion is for those who fear hell, spirituality is for those who have been there."
  162. Deadline by scrutty · · Score: 1

    Well, forty years is a hell of a lot more time to plan a remedy than Bruce had in the movie.

    Maybe enough time for us to move to Mars :-)

    --
    -- Oh Well
  163. Windows already had this problem - check this out by swilly · · Score: 1

    Nice page. I'm curious what will happen so I've bookmarked it.

    By the way, when its all done where do I send the gum?

  164. WTF, Eh? by Chep · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm..... Just to know, how many multi-dozen-megaton bombs were actually built and deployed ?

    megatons aren't that useful. Dozens of Kilotons with variable (selectable yield) + ceramic penetrator or Co coating are much more fun. You want survivors, so that everyone's busy trying to (hopelessy) rescue them. (Think about why personal mines are not designed to kill, but to severely injure).

    A nice albeit useless one : (50 Mt as tested, could go up to 100 in the "dirty" (untested) version) : http://www.enviroweb.org/enviroissues/nuketesting/ hew/Russia/Tsarbmb.jpg.


    Have a look at http://www.enviroweb.org/enviroissues/nuketesting/ hew/index.html, it's pretty instructive (though you shouldn't believe everything, as usual in that kind of subject).

  165. 2077 by oakley · · Score: 1

    According to one of my trustworthy sources, a comet will impact near Padua, Italy in 2077. Fortunately this will not be the end of civilization, it will only wipe out half of Europe.

    Good thing I live in the northern Europe, I most likely will be safe here. But I guess by then, the radiation from my cell. phone has killed me long before.

  166. Windows already had this problem by simp · · Score: 1

    Solaris had it, I think upto Solaris 2.4, after
    exactly 2^31-1 ticks. That's 248 days 13 hours,
    and a few minutes.
    It is very strange to see a bunch of SUN machines
    suddenly freeze....

  167. "Siz of Texas" by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Texas is a lot more than a mile wide, so this asteroid is a lot smaller than the one in the movie as well. Much easier to deal with.

  168. Yay by JEP · · Score: 1

    I, on the other hand, am less optimistic. What would be needed to get rid of the rock? Destruction. Do we really need more advanced weapons of destruction? If it can destroy or divert a kilometer long rock whizzing through space towards your planet, imagine what it would do to your local 7-11.

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  169. Size DOES matter by JEP · · Score: 1

    What it really makes you wonder, though, is "what is the probability that someone made a bad assumption when calculating these probabilities?".

    Eep.

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  170. Size DOES matter by JEP · · Score: 1
    I don't think there's such a thing as an "itty bitty asteroid". The small ones are called "meteoroids." A lot of these are actually just chips off of asteroids. When astronomers talk about asteroids, they are talking about much larger bodies.

    Also, as a previous poster said, planet-killer asteroids are relatively "small" - relative to the scale of the rest of the sky you'd be observing.

    This info is, of course, from my own memory. But a cursory web search produced supporting opinions at the following sites:

    NASA Near Earth Object Program:
    http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/

    Asteroid and Comet Impact Hazards (also NASA):
    http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/

    Interesting reading.

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  171. probably not by JEP · · Score: 1
    talk about getting a tan the hard way...

    "Anybody not wearing 2 million sunblock is gonna have a real bad day."

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  172. probably not by JEP · · Score: 1

    Check out one of my previous posts. There are a couple of links there that talk about comets as well as asteroids.

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  173. What about other planets? by BNL+Psycho · · Score: 1
    I've read that somewhere in the next couple of years, all the planets are supposed to align. Has anyone thought what might happen if one of the other planets get creamed?

    Say Mars or Venus, wouldn't our orbit change? What if Venus got bumped into us? I'd be interested in seeing projected orbit for the inner planets as well...

    And I thout it sucked that I misplaced a $20 bill today...

  174. When the clock runs out by Uart · · Score: 1

    I believe compaq changed DEC Unix to Tru64 unix.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  175. 2039, nah we won't make it that long... by Wah · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to thing, have there ever been any large scale wars that started as small conflicts in Europe? Do people get pissed and hold grudges when you bomb them? Do many countries have nuclear capabilities now? The asteroids I'm worried about are the ones in our leaders heads. We can always send teams of bad-ass drillers to take on the interstellar ones (man, they must get killer bud in L.A)

    --
    +&x
  176. Somewhat? by evin · · Score: 1

    But the time is signed, so it only lasts us 'till year 292277026596

  177. sydney hailstorm! the heavens open... by schmack · · Score: 1

    ...speaking of deadly projectiles falling from the heavens -- we just had a HUGE hail storm in Sydney [Australia]. Hailstones the size of tennis balls smashed up windows, sky lights, car windsheilds. managaed to score some great shots on the digital camera.

    initially i thought it was the neighbourhood druglords enganged in a gun fight -- i went outside to look and almost got taken out by a stone the size of a peach!

    man... this planet's crazy! forget asteroids, there's enough shit falling from the sky to keep me in therapy for decades...

  178. Probability is 1 in 1,000,000,000 by er333 · · Score: 1

    "This results in an
    estimate of the probability for this impact of the order of 10^-9. The
    possibility of such an impact could be frightening, but if we
    assume that the probability of an impact by an undiscovered 1 km
    asteroid is of the order of per year [11], the probability of an
    impact by 1999 AN in 2039 is less than the probability of being
    hit by an unknown asteroid within the next few hours. "

  179. probably not by netwiz · · Score: 1

    Like that Shoemaker-Levy commet, it screwed up Jupiter's crap. The largest recorded explosive release of energy man has ever witnessed (other than the Crab (or was it the horse?) nebula which burned as bright as the sun during day light for a couple weeks a little over 1000 years ago, can you imagine seeing two suns for a couple weeks?

    Or the gamma ray burst from a quasar on the edge of the universe.. The estimates for that sucker are that for about 2 minutes, it was brighter than the entire known universe.

    talk about getting a tan the hard way...

  180. I'm cured! by cynicthe · · Score: 1

    My usually paranoid persona regarding events and insights much less conclusive than this (read: bullshit videogame lawsuits = 1984, it's not the big boys who are the threat it's the normal average everyday moron) reading about disasters has just about confounded my daemon of perversity. Therefore, I am cured.

    Of what?

    My only question is why do we have to go through another 40 years of the world turning ugly before we fry. it's demeaning. God is a Nazi!

    or maybe the rider on the white horse (asteroid) is the guy who turns the world into compost after we've gutted each other.

    --
    The ship sank. Get over it. (This sig was cut out from another's shirt and painstakingly hand-posted)
  181. 2038 by BaB · · Score: 1

    consider the whole world is determined by your birthday paradox ...

    --
    -- all those moments will be lost in time like tears in rain.
  182. The planets will align. by cje · · Score: 1

    You're correct. As the sci.astro FAQ notes, "every time they (the planets) all get within about 90 degrees of each other, somebody will claim that they're 'aligned.'" The truth is that such "alignments" occur every few decades. It is perhaps unfortunate that the next one will happen in the year 2000, at a time where the doomsayers will have everybody worked up enough already.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  183. Any particular reason? by cje · · Score: 1

    It's tempting to say that "nobody will be using 32-bit UNIX machines in the year 2038 anyway." This inevitably will bring forth those who say "well, that's the kind of thinking that got us into the Y2K mess." This may be true, but it's important to remember that there's no reason that time_t can't be represented as a 64-bit quantity even on a 32-bit machine.

    Naturally, this causes some complaints from some individuals (namely, people who write "raw" time_t values into binary files.) "If you change the representation of time_t," they complain, "my code will break!" The response? Tough. Play with fire, and you'll get burned. The representation of time_t has never been guaranteed or perpetual (at least with regards to the C language) and code that absolutely requires a specific representation is poorly written (IMHO.)

    By the way, if we switch to a 64-bit signed integral type, the Sun will have long since burned out before we have to worry about the next "2038-style rollover." Seems a safe choice.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
  184. When the clock runs out by Pont · · Score: 1

    correct me if I'm wrong, but
    4*8 = 32

  185. Posting patterns and big rocks in the sky... by Floogerhog · · Score: 1
    y'notice how after a certain... oops, somebody already said that.


    Ya ever notice that when you do go to the end of the thread, it has nothing to do with the original story?


    So, in an effort to stay on topic... The Incans are wrong. I just finished wiring up my ACME Do-It-Yourself World Destruction Kit. I'd say the world is gonna end... oh, I don't know... say 11:00 pm EDT? Is that cool with everyone else?

  186. You know, I think you may need some help.. by LuTec · · Score: 1

    You ever get the feeling that someone's watching you through a sniper scope? I figure that you'd be the type of person with obsessive paranoia. Go out and get some sun or something.

  187. This sucks by davester · · Score: 1

    What if it hits the moon. Has anybody thought of that?

    1.2 percent? Reach into this bottle and take a pill. This bottle contains 100 placebos and one cyanide tablet. Hey, the chances are so slim, why worry?

    If you follow the math in the article, the chances that an undiscovered planet killing asteriod wipes us out before that one gets to us is 40,000 times greater.

    Don't you feel much better now?

  188. Size DOES matter by davester · · Score: 1

    Nice, but the chance of being hit by just any 'ol asteroid vs. a mile-wide asteroid makes a difference. The fact the Earth can (and does) get pelted with itty bitty asteroids doesn't alarm me. Saying the chance that this mile wide asteroid will hit the Earth is equal to any undiscovered astroid on any day, makes me wonder.

  189. Size DOES matter by davester · · Score: 1

    Well, I just read the article. It speaks of an equally sized astroid. It says the chance of an undiscovered kilometer sized asteriod hitting the Earth in any year is 10 to the -5 while the chance of being hit by this particular astroid in 2039 is 10 to the -9. Okay I feel much better now. The chance of being hit by an undiscovered planet killing asteroid before 2039 is 40,000 times greater than the chance this one will finish us off. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!

  190. Calanders, Mayan by H-Monk · · Score: 1

    > And when is the end of the Mayan calander?

    The Mayan calander doesn't end, it just starts over - so saith that veritable wealth of knowledge, emacs, anyway.


    --

    --
  191. Killer Asteroid by BweeDwee · · Score: 1

    Aww Crap!!!! I suppose this is the end of civilization. I suppose we deserve it. Oh well, at least we know the date of WinD'Ohze demise so that's a good thing right? RIGHT????

  192. January 2038, I believe by vplamondon · · Score: 1

    I disagree, my NT box never needs rebooting. It uses a very fast function called CrashSystem()

  193. Give them free time on a Community Beowulf by grantma · · Score: 1

    Can one of those community Beowulf projects give them some time so they can compute solutions more accurately?

    Any Volunteers?

    Could be great publicity for Linux and the Beowulf Cluster used.

  194. M-x dissociated-press by __LLeweLLyn__Reese__ · · Score: 1

    Well, you *did* ask for random information.

  195. Pessimists! This is a great opportunity!! by Eagle-2 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely!! Plenty of time to rendezvous, install a robust propulsion system on the asteroid, then tweak it when it is on the heliapogee - changing the orbit to direct it wherever we want to. What a great trip that would be. Start signing up volunteers now!!

    --
    Kheeeeee - Khareeeeeeeee!!!
  196. blow up? by Starfire · · Score: 1

    It seems most people think a nuke will "blow up" an asteroid, but realistically there is almost no chance of that. In one above-ground test way back then, the military put a pair of metal balls, 10 inches in diameter I think, a couple feet away from the nuke. They found those balls a couple hundred feet away with only a little of their surfaces vaporized. Asteroids probably routinely hit each other with far more force than a nuke can provide. A comet heald together by mere gravity you _might_ be able to "disperse". A nuke can definitely move things tho, as those two metal balls demonstrated.

  197. i think you misjudge how much astronomers are paid by Bluedove · · Score: 1

    (the subject says it all)

  198. Nothing psoitive anymore by Atrophis · · Score: 1

    All this talk about civilation killers the past few years has been really negitive. Sometimes I really believe that if you dont think about it, its really not a threat.

    Personally, Id like to see something more positive for my future, not this constant talk about how "We are not going to make it" it really does get old to me.

    --

    i cant seem to come up with a sig.
  199. Nothing positive anymore by Eccles · · Score: 2

    >Sometimes I really believe that if you don't think about it, it's really not a threat.

    In the last sixty million years, it seems like there has been at most one truly planet-affecting asteroid collision: the one that may have doomed the dinosaurs. More recently, there was a doozy that carved a sizeable crater in Arizona about 50,000 years ago, and one in Siberia about 100 years ago; no doubt there were a number of others over that same time period. There's no reason to believe that asteroid collisions will change in their frequency, so a truly world-affecting asteroid should be an extremely rare event based on previous history. A Siberia class one is rather more likely, but the question is just how much of our resources do we devote to something that we may not be able to detect in time anyway, may not be able to stop anyway, and may have the unfortunate side-effect of making us even better at killing each other? Reagan's Star Wars speech was in 1983, and 16 years and billions of dollars later it still hasn't come close to realization. I can't see a system that has to go far out into space and blow up something huge (and spread the debris far and wide) doing a whole lot better.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  200. It's all over. by Frater+219 · · Score: 2

    Please don't call it World War III. "World War III" has traditionally referred to a nuclear exchange between superpowers, while the present situation would more likely lead to a fully-informed air- and ground-forces escalation than to the panicked, uninformed, "get them before they get us" escalation to nuclear exchange of the classic WWIII scenario.

    Given the political importance in the present conflict of international bodies such as NATO and the UN, as well as ethnic and political factions within nation-states, it seems like the present situation would more likely escalate into something resembling a global civil war.

    Besides, "Global Civil War" is what it was called in Robotech. Maybe the "asteroid" is really the SDF-1. :)

  201. More intergalactic FUD! by xinit · · Score: 2
    Ya, but the biggest trouble would in the licensing of the planet.


    The Open Earth Initiative (OEI) would write an open letter stating their belief in the new Living Earth Public License (LEPL).


    The Free Space Foundation (FSF) will challenge the OEI's position while claiming that they're not against some company from selling space ships for the great exodus, but that it is necessary for all people to have free access to shuttles. The bar service and food service would cost though.


    "Free Shuttle, not Free Beer" they're heard to say.


    They also insist that since the actual shuttles are licensed under the GPL as derived works (from a GNU editor in the 20th century - see: emacs), that the destination planet be called GNU/World.


    There are currently 15 licenses in the making, and no real work has commenced outside of angry letters and a couple small border skirmishes. The Asteroid is now easily visible in the day sky in the northern hemisphere.


    The latest trajectory reports place the impact in the Western United States near Seattle Washington.

    --
    --- http://foo.ca
  202. The planets will align. by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    This will happen on 5-5-2000.

    But the planets' gravitational pull on our planet is smaller than the moon's, so planetary alignment cannot cause global catastrophe.

    The last time an alighnment similar to the 5/5/2K event happened was like 2-4-1963, and somehow the planet survived. Also there was an April-1982 alignment that was supposed to destroy us as well.

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  203. Mayan Calender by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    I've heard several dates for it:
    12-22-2011, 12-23-2011, 12-23-2012, and 12-24-2012.

    Don't know which is correct

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  204. WTF, Eh? by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    There's always the chance that our war heads will slightly alter the path, and make a collision with earth more likely.

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  205. It's all over. by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    You forgot the pole shift of 5-5-1900!

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  206. Nah? Maybe! by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    Two things come to mind: A Jupiter sized asteroid could not crash into earth, earth would crash into it. For an idea of relative sizes, take a basketball and a large (shooter marble).

    Also, I'm sure that a Jupiter-sized asteroid would be considered a 'planet'

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  207. Forty Years, yeah right! by eponymous+cohort · · Score: 2

    The scientific community will not be taken seriously on this for thirty years, then a five year study will take place, then remaining four years, special interests will stall the project.

    --

    Of all the comments I've ever posted, this is definately one of them

  208. So, This is What We Worry About Now... by DH1 · · Score: 2

    So, now that the Soviets went to that great James Bond villian scene in the sky (Stalin is having cocktails with Ernst Blofeld right about now) we now get to sit around and fret about the 'cosmic hammer' doing us in like it did the dinosaurs.

    Actually, I think this fits human tendencies really well. Besides hitting on the human fear of sudden death, I think down deep most folks like the idea of 'we were such kings of the globe, it took a COSMIC DISASTER to do us in!!!'. I think some must also like the idea of our fossilized bones being dug up one day, mounted in museums, and captioned with tidbits like 'they once ruled the earth...'.

    Oh well... if we really wind up having to depend on a yutz like Bruce Willis to save us, maybe being a set of fossilized remains isn't so bad after all...

  209. How?!? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

    How do you get random information out of emacs?

    --
    They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
  210. "Siz of Texas" by AJWM · · Score: 2

    That was one of the sillier things in that movie. "The size of Texas" puts the asteroid at somewhat bigger (1.5 to 2 times, IIRC) than the asteroid Ceres, largest known in our solar system.
    There's no way you're going to blow that up with any mere collection of nukes, and even if you did, there's no way to avoid having a rain of multi-mile wide chunks falling on you anyway. (Consider - the size of Texas - call it a diameter of 600 miles - means about 40 million mile-wide chunks, distributed evenly).

    The other asteroid movie - "Deep Impact" - at least had the physics a bit more reasonable.

    --
    -- Alastair
  211. probably not by Mr+T · · Score: 2
    What a comet. Apollo asteroids come close periodically but we have had the same orbit for millions of years as have they and I would think that we would have been hit by the ones that will hit us by now, the orbits would have to be just perfectly skewed so that we could orbit for millions and millions of years before an impact. I'd worry more about a comet, they find new ones all the time. A comet has much much more kinetic energy than an asteroid so a smaller comet could hit us and mess things up pretty bad.

    Like that Shoemaker-Levy commet, it screwed up Jupiter's crap. The largest recorded explosive release of energy man has ever witnessed (other than the Crab (or was it the horse?) nebula which burned as bright as the sun during day light for a couple weeks a little over 1000 years ago, can you imagine seeing two suns for a couple weeks? That was a spiritual experience back in those days...)

    I would think that the odds of a comet hitting the planet would be pretty good compared to asteroids. It would/will be crazy too, people are packing up and heading for the hills because of y2k, imagine what would happen when they get on the news and say a comet is heading for us and it looks like it will get her in about 6 months...

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  212. probably not by Mr+T · · Score: 2
    It's true. And if you've spent your whole life looking at the stars waiting to be a real live professional astronomer, are you going to want to look for rocks that might hit the earth or are you going to want to look at starts and galaxies?

    Planet killer asteroids only have to be about a cubic mile in size and with the very best telescopes they can be extremely difficult to see. Some of them orbit the sun in really odd planes and we have to practically stare at the sun to see them, it's very difficult to do.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  213. probably not by Gid1 · · Score: 2

    Hmmm.. 2039. That makes me about 64 years old. About 9 years after my pension matures.

    Let's see.. 9 years of Golf, seeing the sights, watching daytime 3D-TV, and complaining about how things were better in my day.

    Yep. I'll be (a) bored enough by then, and (b) have the money to take a cruise to the Bahamas and watch the fireworks about three seconds before I'm nuked.

    That's if I haven't died of sexual exhaustion (here's hoping), or more likely unfitness and cardiac arrest by then.

    Ah well, it's been a hard day. Perhaps I'm being cynical. =)

  214. More intergalactic FUD! by |DaBuzz| · · Score: 2

    I long for a world of Open Source orbits and a non-monopolistic galaxy where I am free to live on the planet of MY choice, not the planet I was pre-installed on!

  215. Somewhat? by raistlinne · · Score: 3

    Somewhat consists of something like 500 billion years, if I got the calculations correct. Let's see, 2^64seconds * 1minute/60seconds * 1hour/60minutes * 1day/24hours * 1year/356.25days == ; + 1970 (to adjust for the fact that the UNIX date starts january 1st, 1970) == 584,542,048,061. So for those of us on Alphas (and some other platforms), the date will run out some time in the year 584,542,048,061. 584,542,048,061 - 2039 (to be generous) == 584,542,046,023. You call a difference of 584,542,046,023 years "somewhat"?!?

    --
    They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
  216. When the clock runs out by raistlinne · · Score: 3

    Only if you're on a 32bit system. Those of us fortunate enough to run Alphas (and some other architectures, but I forget them at the moment) should be good until the year, hm, I forget the calculation, but it's something like 500 billion, or so.

    --
    They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
  217. Please remember to init 0 your machines! by jerodd · · Score: 3
    It might be a good idea to set up a cron job or something similar to make sure you shutdown your system before the asteroid hits. (Perhaps we could include `doomsday.chron' and then use rdist(8) to distribute that file from a central astronomical observatory.) We want to avoid filesystem corruption on the last disks/machines ever to exist.

    I'm personally far more worried about spending the rest of my life under opressive government rule (like 99% of the world's past denizens have spent their lives) than I am about sudden destruction. Hey, it ends quickly; persecution doesn't.

    --
    --jon. Postel is dead. May we all mourn his, and our, loss.
  218. The important part by Fizgig · · Score: 3

    The important part of the article:


    None of these encounters can result in an impact, except one in August 2039: the probability that the true asteroid actually follows a collision course for that date is less than the probability of being hit by an undiscovered asteroid within any given day.


    There, we can go back to worrying about the ones we can't see.

  219. probably not by JEP · · Score: 3

    ...August 2039: the probability that the true asteroid actually follows a collision course for that date is less than the probability of being hit by an undiscovered asteroid within any given day.


    Given this, I fail to see the big deal.

    --

    --

    --
    Jason Eric Pierce

  220. Don't dismiss the article! by Anonymous+Shepherd · · Score: 4

    It's pretty hard to worry about something we can't see =)

    But this asteroid we can see...

    And it passes close enough to our own planet that they perturb each other, and it passes nearby often enough in the next 600 years that we cannot predict if it will hit us or not, or when.

    After each near miss, of course, we can observe the movement of the asteroid and get a better understanding of its motion, but until it misses we actually don't know if it's going to hit!

    And I quote
    "Among the possible orbital solutions
    there are some that undergo a close approach in August 2027, but no impact is possible. However, the period of the asteroid may be perturbed in such a way that it returns to an approach to the Earth at either of the possible encounter points."

    It goes on to note that their accuracy isn't good for more than a decade after each pass, and that each successive pass makes it worse...

    Not something you want to ignore when there is a greater danger from it, than say, Y2k or something...

    AS

    --

    -AS
    *Pikachu*