Slashdot Mirror
Cross Platform Email Client?
AndrewRF asks: "I was wondering whether there was a good cross-platform email client that shares a common format for local mail, preferences, address book, filters, etc. files. I split time between a Win32 environment and Linux and collect mail from 3 different POP servers. I frequently find myself needing to boot out of Linux to retrieve a message downloaded by my Windows mail client that is stored in some non-accessible format. I've tried leaving the messages on the mail servers, but it's not as seamless as I would like. What I would really like would be have both platforms share a single, common set of local files. I've looked around, but haven't found anything that does the trick. I suspect that I could do this with Pine, though I'm ideally looking for something more GUIish. "
To my knowledge, there is no such animal, although I wonder if there is a way to do this using external tools and scripts on both ends. Your thoughts?
As you say, the opening display is not so good, kinda scrunched up to the top of the screen, but there has to be SOME way to fix it !
When I try to export messages from OE5, it is complaining that MAPI isn't installed. I don't really feel like downloading Outlook or MS Mail, any other solutions?
Joe converted from Eudora to KMail simply by copying the Eudora mail files to his unix partition and pointing KMail at them. I would imaging sharing the mail database would work quite well.
Hope this helps.- -------------
-----------------------------------------
my blog: good times, man, good times
Does anyone know of a script that converts Outlook Express mail folders/messages to formats readable by PINE, etc. I saw one once but it didn't work with the latest version of OE.
I had a similar problem, since imho netscapes mail client bites I chose to go w/ a browser based approach.. Its similar to hotmail, but you can run it on your own box, and it can poll pop3 accounts.
Crude, but effective.
darrem
(darren)
noop == mnemonic assembler comand for no operation. When it recieves a noop command, the CPU just sits idle for one clock then goes on to the next instruction. Why the IMAP protocol bothers to implement a noop instruction is beyond me, though...
0 1 - just my two bits
I have run into this annoying problem myself a lot. IMHO it is seriously broken that email programs, calendar apps, address books and so on take the user's info and encode it into some form that is not useable outside (exceptions for standard unix email format) the proprietary program that first touched and "managed" the information. What I plan to hack on some day RSN is representing this info in a non-proprietary format as XML with code to go from/to various proprietary formats. Eventually GUI minded folk can write these tools that take the XML as their native format.
I support Netscape daily, and it's mostly identical across all platforms. You can likely point your paths in your Linux installation to a mounted vfat drive. It's something I should have tried (but I avoid using doze). One drawback is Netscape 4.6x didn't support multiple pop boxes within one configuration. I'm worthless, I haven't used 4.7 yet. Does it?
If you file a message by dragging the header, it markes the old message to be deleted, but will not delete them upon a purge. Outlook Exp. 4 used semicolons to separate recipients. Bad voodoo in that gatesware. Keep away. Use MUTT.
I believe there was a slashdotted article a couple of months back about a HP product called Openlook as an outlook replacement, they were doing free trials to get feedback until they released it comercialy. IIRC it was to run under Linux and HP-UX.
This is my sig, exciting huh!
While on this subject, does anyone know of an exchange client for linux (with access to public folders and forms etc.) it's the one thing thats stopping me changing this computer to linux at work :(.
I don't know if this will help you, but what about using IMAP on the server end to store your messages. If you really need the address book and everything you could try TWIG (web-based email). If you go over to freshmeat.net and do a search for twig, they will give you the web page.
I dont know if that helps you. It might be a little off-topic (since you asked for a client), but using IMAP is the solution I use. I also use procmail to sort my mail into folders on the server.
I use Windows NT at work and for personal mail, I am using Outlook Express and have the following settings turned "on":
Leave a copy of message on server
Remove from server when deleting from "Deleted Items"
This way I can keep up with messages during the day. If there's a message I want to read later on at home, I can either mark it as "unread" or *not* delete it from my "Deleted Items" folder. When I go home and check mail, it shows up as a new message.
I don't know if this helps, but it's an idea. As for your mail clients, Netscape's mail client has similar settings (I think). I have Netscape's browser-only here at work.
On a side note, though somewhat related, I accidently left Outlook Express open at work. It was checking for mail every 15 minutes or so. When I was at home getting mail, NONE of them were showing up as "N" in Mutt!! I checked and double-checked my settings in .muttrc many times trying to figure that out! Since they'd already be retrieved, but not removed from my mail server, they were not considered "New".
I'm posting to ask if anyone has any pointer to any "authoritative" elm sites ? Elm development seems to be badly fragmented, and things like MIME support and PGP support are kind of hit-or-miss.
Use IMAP. The best support for IMAP is provided by Outlook Express on Windows (Not outlook; it cannot store sent messages on the server), and, of course, twig, and IMP.
I tried netscape on Unix, but it crashes when I use it with IMAP. Also, IMAP is way better than POP, even when POP supports leaving the mail on the server.
I heard that vm on emacs support IMAP, and so does mutt. I haven't tried them though.
Communicator mail format is a standard unixspool file; you can transparently use the files from both Windows and Linux - caveat, I don't think the indexes are, though.
:)
I used to keep my mail shared and do this before I finally kicked the Windows habit alltogether.
-te
I've been using Netscape in both Windoze and Linux for about 6 months now and it works great. I was using Netscape in Windoze when I finally got a large enough hard drive to give some space to Linux (I'd get rid of windoze if it weren't for the wife). You just have to make sure you set up Netscape under Linux to read from the correct directory. I also have it set up so I can check my e-mail whether I'm logged in as root or my standard username. The only real problem with Netscape is that it only allows a connection to one POP server. To use multiple servers you must use IMAP.
"Anyone who can't laugh at himself is not taking life seriously enough." - Larry Wall
I had the same problem and I think I have it solved. I have a little Linux box at home that runs IPChains and so forth. I set it up to use fetchmail to collect mail from different accounts, then I use an IMAP client on my workstation to read the messages. On Linux I use Netscape, on Windows NT I use Outlook 2000. Seems to work pretty well and I don't have to worry about losing mail messages if I decide to re-install NT!
I think that I do remember Pine being multi-platform. Check it out: http://www.washington.edu/pine, *NIX and DOS/Windows ports
The origional poster was talking about "Outlook Express" not Outlook, confusing, no. As you know the old Outlook Express 4 and earlier used text files to store the messages, not exactally RFC standard but workable. OE5 apparently uses a binary format. I have had some success in converting OE5 email into Windows Messaging .PST format, and then using Communicator or an older version of OE to convert this into a text file. Try it and see.
-- Remember: Wherever you go, there you are!
J Street Mailer is a 100% Pure Java application. It's now available for free.
And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
Why would you prefer a GUI mail client? After trying out various GUI client I wound up going back to PINE myself. One big advantage of the non-GUI is the ease of scrolling through text. Hitting the spacebar is a lot easier than keeping that pointer in the scrollbar area and dragging/clicking/wheeling up and down.
Plus I like the ease of archiving mail in Pine using Mbox format boxes and just BZipping them and moving them off-line as I see fit.