Slashdot Mirror


LinuxCare Gets $32M In Funding

TheFitz writes "CBS is running a story about LinuxCare receiving some heavy backing. Also mentioned in the story is the potential for LinuxCare to go public with an IPO. " Several comments from Sifry and a few other tidbits about the company. Worth a gander if you're curious about Linuxcare.

65 comments

  1. Everything in place now by trance9 · · Score: 4

    I think I'm finally ready to say that Linux is a credible threat to Microsoft. I think the change in the last week was an import one psychologically as well as financially.

    The business world has not only noticed Linux now (that happened last year), they're firmly behind it. Gone are the days when we have to argue that Linux is just as good as a commercial system--now we can just point to a few billion dollars of investments and say "Obviously they believe it." That's a dumb argument, but it's one that carries weight with non-technical people who don't understand the actual merits of one OS over another.

    Finally, all this money pouring into Linux is obviously going to translate into a lot of paid development hours and new applications. That should fill in whatever gaps there are missing in the Linux platform.

    From now on, the missing functionality is no longer a liability... it's an OPPORTUNITY.

    1. Re:Everything in place now by dante921 · · Score: 2

      Just because the business world has noticed Linux doesn't mean that everything is in place. Big companies will probably make up a huge chunk of Linux users, but only when Linux has become a true alternative to Windows in terms of average home users will everything truly be in place. Fortunately, I think that the biggest thing holding back (knowledgeable) home users from choosing Linux is the small number of applications for the typical home user. Until my mom and dad at home can get all the software they use on Linux, they'll stick with the status quo. (A funny sidenote: my grandmother, who didn't have a computer at the time, once asked me if she should get windows 95. No joke.) The reason I say fortunately is because as more businesses choose Linux, more developers will write software for Linux. That's when I think everything will be in place.

    2. Re:Everything in place now by MoToMo · · Score: 3

      I tend to disagree with you. Buisness drives the IT world, and home users are more of a niche market. Furthermore, if one controls the buisness setting, those people who have linux on their desktop at work will more likely buy what they already are familiar with for home use.

      Besides, who ever said that Linux must dominate all markets? Anyone who strives to make linux a dominant operating system is missing the point. The effort needs to be put into making it a better OS, and the domination will follow. Linux has never been about the big advertising and commercialism, it's been about doing thing well, and letting the product speak for itself.

      The goal should not be to have Linux penetrate into markets such as grandma's house, it should be to make the best OS possible and to let things fall into place. If grandma doesn't use linux, who cares? She might prefer the candy colored macs to match her stained glass windows for all i care.

      Microsoft is/was trying to make themselves the answer to every question. I think that is what will make them fail. Linux doesn't have to be the answer to every question, just the answer to some of them.

      -Dan

    3. Re:Everything in place now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBM seems to think Microsoft is the big winner. IBM purchased, about 30,000 copies of Windows 2000. That says alot.

    4. Re:Everything in place now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say business's use Linux, but you know for what? Server's basically, which is a small small small sum of the computer business workplace.

    5. Re:Everything in place now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Microsoft shouldn't "try" to make an all-in-one OS? Why not? If you think they'll fail, there's nothing to worry about. But I think Windows 2000 won't fail anytime soon.

  2. Better way to phrase it? by droob · · Score: 1

    Nitpicky? Yes.

    It seems to me that saying "go public with an Initial Public Offering" is a bit redundant, or at least awkward syntax. With all the IPOs these days, should we find a more elegant way of phrasing this?

    1. Re:Better way to phrase it? by TheFitz · · Score: 1

      I actually spent in the upwards of 5 minutes trying to figure out how to word that. Unfortanatly, I'm a programmer and a server administrator, not an english major, so I went with what sounded the best :)

      --
      "Out, OUT! You demons of STUPIDITY!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:Better way to phrase it? by jawad · · Score: 1

      How about to "introduce their IPO"?

      (score: 0, dumb)

      i dont display scores, and my threshhold is -1. post accordingly.

  3. Excellent service! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I've called them a couple of times with problems. I on each ocassion found them to be friendly and smart. They know their stuff. Neither of the reps I spoke with had a problem admiting when he didn't know something, and was always able to go ask someone who did. I think they are a fine company, and I recomended them to my company to contract with for linux support.

  4. Open Source by eiPi · · Score: 1
    When does open source cease to be open- I do nt, and have never believed that most corporate interests are served by free software- rather than by charging (of course for consumers it is a different matter). I believe that we should look carefully about all these recent funding sources and see what is in it for the providers.

    --If you have nothing to say, say nothing...
    ...I'll shut upnow... before I start talking about a first post...--

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity- I enjoy it immensly!
    1. Re:Open Source by belgin · · Score: 3
      I believe that we should look carefully about all these recent funding sources and see what is in it for the providers.

      Simple. The corporations get to sell services. Selling a service is usually much more lucrative than selling software. If you have a person charging $100 an hour to troubleshoot other people's problems with setting up Linux, or maintaining Linux, you make a pretty good chunk of change. People who really understand a given piece of software are more rare than many /.ers tend to remember. The Total Cost of Ownership is what we are talking about here, not the cost of initially buying into the software.

      When IBM has Linuxcare answer someone's questions, that someone pays IBM $X, and IBM gives Linuxcare ($X - $Y).

      B. Elgin

      --

      B. Elgin
      "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
    2. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read ESR's essay The Magic Cauldron. Im currently reading the book version of "The Cathedral and the Bazaar". in The Magic Cauldron, he discusses the value of development vs. the value of service. Im sure you can find this essay online. just dont ask me where

  5. IPO!!! okay you got my attention!! by pestihl · · Score: 1

    if it's anything like VM linux... muf said

    --
    "What do you do with the mad that you feel when you feel so mad you could bite?" - Mister Rogers
    1. Re:IPO!!! okay you got my attention!! by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      You mean VA Linux, "/vmlinux" is something totally different... :-) Well, without /vmlinux, VA Linux wouldn't be there I guess.

    2. Re:IPO!!! okay you got my attention!! by technos · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean

      /boot/vmlinux
      /usr/src/linux/arch/1386/boot/vml inuz
      or
      c:\lilo\vmlinu z?

      Nobody keeps it in / anymore! What are you, a 1.2.xx junkie? ;)

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:IPO!!! okay you got my attention!! by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 3

      I am a 0.99 junkie... :-)

      I am also a smartass, but that is beside the point. :-)

  6. Some interesting comments. by belgin · · Score: 2
    I found some of the comments about Linuxcare alternately humorous and very interesting. One point that should be noted is the fact that some very heavy hitters in the industry are placing a lot of trust in this company. IBM does NOT farm out support to any group that does not know what it is doing. (At least, not for very long.) Michael Dell investing in the company is also interesting.

    I found it humorous the way that employees of Linuxcare were listed as "contributors to Linux". With the exception of Samba, nothing seemed to be said about what they contributed. Is there any serious Linux company that doesn't employ at least a couple of people who have contributed to Linux and other GPL'd software?

    I don't know too much about Linuxcare, but it might bear watching in the future. The industry is currently watching to see which Linux distributor "wins" the market...

    B. Elgin

    --

    B. Elgin
    "Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
    1. Re:Some interesting comments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4
      Linuxcare "Gurus" at:

      Linuxcare Gurus who's who

      Include Tridgell, Paul Mackerras(Linux on PPC), Paul Russell(ipchains), the excellent group of people at Prosa, and more on their way!

    2. Re:Some interesting comments. by Bricius · · Score: 1
      • Is there any serious Linux company that doesn't employ at least a couple of people who have contributed to Linux and other GPL'd software?
      Open-source paradigm is based on the trust of the community.
      Hiring free sw developers (to develop free sw) will increase the company's karma.
      Once Linux-companies will start competing between them, you'll see advertisements based on how much they have contributed to the community.

      This can be called a virtuous circle.

    3. Re:Some interesting comments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think this is already happening. When developers interview at free software companies, they are starting to ask about what projects the companies are supporting, or how the company helps free software.

      O brave new world that has such people in it!

  7. Great - Linux Support gets what it deserves by mparaz · · Score: 1

    Now with this funding they should be able to provide better support services - both for paying mission-critical customers, and for casual users too by improving their knowledge base. I'm personally interested in improving the set of Linux knowledge bases that are freely available and Linuxcare should be a good "helpdesk".

  8. Linux Professional Institute by mparaz · · Score: 1

    I'm also watching the Linux Professional Institute with interest... they're working towards professional certification for Linux - though that seems to be a controversial topic all by itself.

  9. Their own icon?!? by Knight · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me, but I'm overwhelmed with the number of icons that now exist for various news stories. Does Slashdot need to have an icon for every business that ever mentions Linux in a press release? If so, there's going to be about 20 MB of icons in the next few months. One thing I like about slashdot is that the only image I have to reload every time I visit is the banner, so if there's a new icon every time I visit, my brain-dead browser has to download it before it renders the page.

    Also, has anyone else noticed that the icons at the top of the page are always 3-8 stories behind? Why is that? When I first saw it, I thought it was a temporary result of some changes, but now it's been there for a couple months.

    Just some suggestions. Keep up the good work Rob, Jeff, et al.

    1. Re:Their own icon?!? by sudama · · Score: 1

      the icons at the top of the page are always 3-8 stories behind? Why is that? When I first saw it, I thought it was a temporary result of some changes, but now it's been there for a couple months.

      I've been wondering what's up with that. It wasn't always like that, was it? I thought the first icon on the left used to represent the top story on the page...

      --
      -- Adam
  10. It's a GOOD Thing by Spazmoid · · Score: 3

    Finally... an Intelligent FP :).

    Anyway, I think this has the ability to become a very good thing. While we have seen over the past year or so that businesses have started to turn an eye toward linux and then become major invetors, one of the key obstacles to any type of major OS or software is support. Where do the big guys go when they don't have the knowledge or resources available to figure something out? Once an infrastructure like that is in place it filters down to lower and lower levels, IE: smaller corporations and eventually small businesses. I don't thing that it will be long till me get some certification levels and alphabet soup tied to our knowledge. I know a lot of people here are not exactly friendly toward tech. certifications, but like it or not, a lot of not technical managers look to them to gauge a persons worth. Even if we know the certification doesnt mean crap,

    Anyway, our time has come. Make your opportunities!

  11. Re:ah yeah by mistabobdobalina · · Score: 0

    okay i just have to ask now..who the hell is natalie portman????

    [relying to this is killing my karma...who cares?]

    --
    -- your knees hurt, don't they?
  12. Mistake in article by EricWright · · Score: 3
    Quoted from the article:

    Andrew Tridgell, [is] a Linuxcare researcher who authored Samba, a piece of programming that makes a Linux server work much like a Microsoft (MSFT: news, msgs) Windows NT server.

    like ...what a funny way to spell better!!!

    Eric

    PS This is humor. Turn off the flame-throwers.

    1. Re:Mistake in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS This is humor. Turn off the flame-throwers.

      Reminds me of a television studio taping and they have to turn on the lighted "APPLAUSE" and "LAUGH" signs to get something out of an obviously bored audience. What scares me is that people actually go for such dry content and moderate self concious posts over informative and relevant ones to 5.

    2. Re:Mistake in article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone's a fucking critic. go shove a roman candle up your ass.

  13. Re:ah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natalie is the troll's pregnant teenage daughter who's dating an unemployed dork distributing microserf warez. Quite sad.

    Oh, Natalie Portman! Oh, you might want to check out the Star Wars site.

  14. Another IPO? by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Another IPO? Expect to see a flurry of people trying to get their names in a few of the contributor lists so they can get the "letter" this time.

    Hmm, what could *I* fix... :-)

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    1. Re:Another IPO? by sethg · · Score: 4
      Expect to see a flurry of people trying to get their names in a few of the contributor lists...
      In this message from last week, I suggested pretty much the same thing. A day later, I got the following email. As Dave Barry would say, I swear I am not making this up.
      Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 10:38:18 -0800 (PST)
      From: censored to protect the guilty
      To: sethg@ropine.com
      Subject: help please on uploading helloworld to freshmeat.net

      hi, i read slashdot today and you stated that a person can post a helloworld program to freshmeat.net/org/whatever.

      guess i missed the ipo boat for valinux. can you pleez help w/ instructions on how to create/upload the helloworld program for next ipo's?

      i use rh6.0 w/ gnome and enlightenment- thanks!

      \begin{joke}
      The answer to his question, of course, is to join the Free Software Developers' Network. The FSDN offers freshmeat access, and a whole bunch of other valuable services, for a mere $19.95 per year. If you're interested in joining the FSDN, just email me your credit-card number and expiration date, and I'll pass along your application.
      \end{joke}
      --
      "But, Mulder, the new millennium doesn't begin until January 2001."
      --
      send all spam to theotherwhitemeat@ropine.com
    2. Re:Another IPO? by vectro · · Score: 1

      Don't bet on it. I got the redhat letter, and my only contribution was making a couple entries into their bugzilla.

  15. Low-Graphics Printer-Friendly Link by Mignon · · Score: 3

    In case anyone's interested, here's the low-graphics, printer-friendly link.

  16. Re:ah yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Queen Oh-My-God-A from StarWars. Even though OSS-NP dude is a bit of a troll, I must say he does have some amount of taste. Personally I would prefer an Open Source Erika Eleniak or Paulina Porizkova, but alas, since I can't code I keep my mouth shut and take what they offer (I will however be happy to alpha/beta test any open source female celebrities weighing less than 175 pounds).

  17. Effective way to "pay" for free software: Invest. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I think the stock market is going to turn out to be one of the most effective ways to fund free software. Instead of throwing away $$ to Microsoft on software rental, invest that money in companies that create/support free software.
    Then you get better software for keeps, companies get investment to make(and support) more free software, and hey you also may get a finacial return on your investment. Cool.

  18. Re:ah yeah by PD · · Score: 1

    You'll pay 32 million dollars for Natalie Portman?

    I know who you are! You must be ESR!

    Har har.

  19. Cool... by jallen02 · · Score: 1

    Everyone has been so hell bent on defeating Microsoft.. Problem? I dont think many folks to include myself realized what that meant. To late is it now to come back from the dark side. Damage has been done. We have gotten what we want. A playing field in which to hack it out with MS? Is it going to be worth it when enough money infiltrates the scheme of things? Stay tuned...

    1. Re:Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To point out your propaganda: "dark side". Learn from it. Don't become what you hate.

  20. Yet another IPO by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    Otherwise known as Yaipo?
    I guess its time for everyone to cash in now...
    I hope all this hype won't bite back when stockmarket types suddenly realize they have millions invested in companies that aren't making money....
    Then again, if *I* was a member of the VA board, I expect my perspective would be altogether different... *smile*
    --
    "Just another programmer who hasn't scored his millions yet"

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
  21. Related Article by sled · · Score: 3

    This article also mentions some recent acquisitions by Linuxcare.

    http://biz.yahoo.com/rf/991214/c.html

  22. when these prices crash... then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    these internet and linux companies are selling at billions over what they will ever be worth. What happens when people figure that out, and prices skydive?

    or do you think that won't ever happen? It's very interesting to me.

  23. Did anybody here get in on the VALS IPO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious if anybody got in on the VA Linux IPO. it went up 800% on the first day (it's dropping steadily now though) I'd like to have made 800% of course. did anybody here get a piece of the action? care to share details so I can be jealous?

    1. Re:Did anybody here get in on the VALS IPO? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware, it was impossible for the average investor (i.e. most people) to get the stock at sub $250 prices.

      I was watching my DLJ Direct account *very* closely in the minutes leading up to the opening of LNUX, and the very first price I saw for it was $248.

      Needless to say, I didn't buy, and the limit order of $31 that I had put in earlier in the day didn't go through either :).

      Alot of people *must* have gotten screwed, because AFAIK anyone who put in a market order on it before it opened got it at $250+, and it has pretty much dropped like a rock since then.

      This is the way that Internet stocks are though. They are a way for a few lucky people to cash in without producing anything of value for the economy, while lots of other people who try to jump on the get-rich-quick bandwagon lose their shirts.

      These types of stocks are basically swindles, as the only people who really make money are the VC firms who put out the inital outlay of cash and take the company public. They end up selling their share at a *highly* inflated value to a bunch of people who, due to greed or stupidity, or both, think that by giving VCs lots of money they themselves might make some too.

  24. Good indeed, but remember the roots by ~-zman-~ · · Score: 3
    The fact that linux is becoming recognized in the mainstream media and by corporate conglomo's is indeed a "good thing".

    However, we need to remember that we don't need to justify ourselves. Each of us use linux for whatever reason we want to. I personally don't care if linux takes down windows. It would make me happy as I have a personal vendetta with MS, but as far as the development of linux, it's unimportant.

    As linux grows into the masses it is becoming simpler and easier to use. This is a good thing. When people have trouble, they look for support from a trusted name. LinuxCare is looking to be that name.

    All of this is well and good, as long as linux stays in touch with it's roots.

    It is important to remember what free software is really about. Freedom. Not price.

    Don't use VA's IPO, RedHat's IPO, or LinuxCare 32m to justify your use. There is plenty of justification already in place.

    1. Re:Good indeed, but remember the roots by aftyde · · Score: 1

      Agreed. We had Richard Stallman come in a few months ago and speak to management about free software. I think it's important for business management to understand the advantages and empowerment that free software delivers. No company should ever own a standard, or an operating system. GNU/Linux REQUIRES organizations like the LSB and LPI. Let's not let anyone run off with GNU/Linux...

  25. Sadly, I'm not surprised by Cardinal · · Score: 1

    You know the really sad thing about that e-mail you recieved.. I'm not even slightly surprised.

    I was musing that this sort of thing may actually start to happen a lot while I was reading over the vast threads of posts regarding the VA IPO frenzy. Specifically people were discussing motivation (Well, that was covered more in the ESR article comments), and how some people may begin to try contributing to attention-getting projects in the hopes of getting onto a contributor list. Now I'm curious to see if it really does happen. However, I do hope it takes more than a half-assed program on Freshmeat to get corporate attention.

  26. Thank you linux... by Lx · · Score: 1

    For contributing in your own small way to the impending economic collapse of the United States. I'm getting really sick of hearing about mediocre companies at best going for IPOs, knowing that their stock price will be bid by a bunch of amateur investors up far further than their price/earnings multiple would indicate what they're really worth, simply because they have the word 'Linux' in the name. This is disgusting. RedHat I could understand, but VA? Linuxcare? These are companies that are nowhere near the point at which a company usually has an IPO. People are being ripped off. And this has to be screwing up the economy, throwing millions of dollars after worthless tech stocks of companies that don't actually make any money, nor do they have the potential to. It used to be good to see Linux have some success in the software market, but its just gone too far. But if the goal is to compete with Windows, I would say that Linux is well on its way. -lx

    1. Re:Thank you linux... by AIXadmin · · Score: 1

      I worked at Linuxcare for a while, and left for my own reasons.
      Let me explain why I think Linuxcare will succeed:
      1. They have a real managment team. They just didn't take people who had done cool things on Linux and throw them into managment. The team over their is full of Fortune 500 executives.
      http://www.linuxcare.com/company/bios/index.epl
      2. Fernand Serrat is their CEO and a bottom line guy. He spent 20+ years at IBM. He is a very fair, but bottom line kind of guy. He knows what it takes.
      3. These guys all have a technology background, they know what the big boys want. They know how to give it them.
      4. They are one of the few companies that I have seen that has found the balance between geekdom, and the suits. They know the importance of the geeks, and the open source community. And can bridge that with the needs of the business community. People like Art Tyde and Dave Sifry are great bridges.
      5. Red Hat just got lucky, right place right time. These guys actually have the stuff to back it up.
      Cheers,
      WFE
      ===========

  27. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forty second!

  28. The bandwagon already left by Animats · · Score: 1
    It's probably too late for them to get on the Linux IPO bandwagon. VA Linux (ticker symbol LNUX) is in a screaming dive, down from a high of 320 to 174 right now.

    First we had the "we don't have to be profitable, we're an Internet company". That was a marginal idea, although OK if revenue is large and increasing. Now we have "we don't have to have revenue, we're a Linux company". That is not going to fly for long.

  29. Corel File-Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing looks cool! Will it compile on my Redhat 6.1 box ? If so where can I download it?

  30. I don't think this is flamebait! by Travoltus · · Score: 1


    I think it is very true and when the time comes for a shakeout and the mass financial wipeouts (of people running unprofitable businesses whose stock is now worth $xxx per share) begin, there will be financial tidal waves all over the western world akin to a quarter mile wide comet landing in the Atlantic.

    It's gonna happen. This overvaluation has to deflate sometime.

    If you don't believe me check up on the 1920's.

    BTW: Someone please moderate that man up. He deserves it.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  31. Re:WIN2K will shut you up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM purchasing 30,000 copies of Windows 2000 and barnes&noble seem to be using it through the busiest shopping season right now. Likewise with Microsoft.com and soon Hotmail. Linux hype?? where??

  32. Can I get that in writing by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    No, you can't even put an identity on this 'prediction', so we can't chuckle at you personally next February (and if Win2k is anything like NT, it's going to be 5 long years of luser testing before they get it up to snuff - Gartner Group: wait untill service pack 3). At least Bob Metcalf had the courage to put his name on his belief that these Internet stocks we're all going to crash on Nov. 8

    Besides, OS/2 was pretty much just another NT (in more ways than one) w/o the benefit of an installed base of DOS and Win31 to leverage, capitalize on, exploit and ensure they migrate to yet another Mickysoft product from.

    Win2k will meets the needs of a lot of people, it will succeed - just some of us will demand software we can work with and control, not luserware that want's to control us w/ 'proactive help/marketing'. And I'm certainly not going to make the mistake of supporting M$ products on someone else's dime again (they're still getting a lot of 'free' support from their suckers) - if someone pays for a Win2k license (and esp if they pirate it) and has a problem and swivels around to look at me, I'm just going to read them the EULA, laugh and say "sorry I don't support it - call MSFT, it's their property".

    Boojum

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  33. New article types on Slashdot for anyone to post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could be a bug or a feature in the SlashCode running Slashdot -- has anyone else noticed it is now possible effectively to post your own stories on Slashdot using the URL form comments.pl?sid=yourLoginName? More details and questions about this were posted on Slashdot yesterday.

  34. A company which can actually make money by rusty · · Score: 1
    The reason I joined Linuxcare: I feel they are in a position to make a reasonable amount of money; consulting in the Linux space is going to be big, and I think will be a good thing to work in, because you can actually fix the problems a customer might have.

    This makes the engineer in me feel satisfied; even if the stock is a bust, Linuxcare has a bright future.

    Just my opinion,
    Rusty.

  35. Re: linux critical mass by poopie · · Score: 3

    When linux is being covered by Gartner reports and shows up favorably in the "magic quadrant", then it's big news. Many large corporate decisions are made based solely on a simple gartner square with some dots in it.

    It sounds silly, but if you're in a big company, and you're pushing a solution or a product that isn't favored by Gartner research, Senior management's going to ask you to re-evaluate and see why $GARTNER_TOP_PICK wouldn't work for the company.

    Nowadays, the senior execs have suddenly "DISCOVERED" linux, and now they're looking to form "Strategic Alliances" and establish "linux partnerships" (but the senior execs are still using Windows :()

    anyway, on a related note, I head 3 non-technical women in the movie theater yesterday talking about investment (and the LNUX IPO) and one was trying to explain to the others what linux was. She said "now everybody is trying to learn linux - it's like windows NT but people say it's better and it's free." To me, overhearing that discussion meant more than placement on the gartner quadrant!

    Have you noticed that nowadays hardly anyone mispronounces linux?

  36. YAFLCSO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet
    Another
    Fucking
    Linux
    Company
    Selling
    Out

  37. Re: FP == FinkPloyd == Not Intelligent by BeefPaste · · Score: 1

    FP are you following watching me???

  38. true enough by Lx · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to come off saying that Linuxcare is a worthless company, it just seems too soon to me to be having an IPO. There's been kind of a Linux IPO frenzy lately, and that's what I disapprove of, not the services that Linux-oriented companies provide. Things like VA's IPO scare the hell out of me - that kind of manic stock market doesn't bode well for the future.

    -lx

  39. the 1920s by Lx · · Score: 1

    That's very true about the 1920s. I had noticed that about a year ago and got somewhat freaked out, but eventually I guess I found myself in denial about it - no one wants to think that another depression will happen. I think that when the market has the correction that it so richly deserves, it's going to really suck, but it won't be as bad as The Depression - we now have far better understandings of monetary and fiscal policy than we did back then.

    -lx

  40. Re: linux critical mass by Tor · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed that nowadays hardly anyone mispronounces linux?

    Actually, they almost all still do - though in a better way than before. In Finnish, the "i" in Linu[xs] is a long one. So "Leenux", not "Linn-ux", would be the correct phonetic spelling in English.

  41. Whahey! by nine9 · · Score: 1
    This is really good... I've noticed so many Linux companies and organisations springing up recently... It's really beginning to destabilise the way most modern computing is centred around the sortof Microsoft-IBM axis... Here's an example: a couple of years ago there was only one place of where I lived where I knew they used Linux for sure (a local Internet café)... Now I think there's over a dozen of them...

    We need to shove Microsoft off the map! I'm glad that Sun is up there heading the list of primary investors... Though Sun is starting to get Monolithic... Finding anything on their website is almost as hard as finding anything on microsoft.com...No, I'm lying... finding anything on microsoft.com is impossible!!!

    I thought the article was good in mentioning that Dell and Plattner are investing personally in Linuxcare... If Linuxcare is publicly traded they will probably make a lot of money (understatement...)

    Two things I found really interesting from the article...: (i) I didn't know Tridgell worked for Linuxcare; and (ii) what Sarrat says at the end: "... look at IBM. They didn't get good at services until they split them out as a separate comapany"