Slashdot Mirror


Gateway Sells Rights to Amiga Name

kman writes "I just read the news on ABCNews that Gateway Sells Rights to Amiga Name - Personal computer maker Gateway Inc. signed a deal to sell its Amiga trademarks and computer systems to closely held Amino Development Corp. " Ah, the saga of Amiga continues - terms were not disclosed, but Gateway has decided to "wrap Amiga's software engineering function into Gateway's product development systems" making it sound like GW is considering continuing to make the "information appliances" they were originally planning.

80 comments

  1. Last first post of the millenium. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or something.

    1. Re:Last first post of the millenium. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not quite. The last first post of the millenium will be the last first post of 2001 Moderators: PLEASE moderate this down so that users dont have to look at this crap :)

  2. AMIGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WORST POST!!!

    1. Re:Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First post! Boy, I must not have a life! Where is everybody?

  3. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NAKED AND PETRIFIED

  4. Fleecy & Bill (Amino) rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Way to go! At last the Amiga is in good hands!

    Fleecy, I knew you were going to make it... ;)

    Nutti - who's emailing you tomorrow with juicy stuff

    1. Re:Fleecy & Bill (Amino) rule! by dammy · · Score: 1

      Now I wonder if Amino Developement (Bill and Co) will release AOS as open source? This may come to be great news for the AROS (Amiga Replacement OS) team that has been on hold be GateWay not wanting to give their blessings. Wonder how this will effect the Phoenix Project?

  5. Its dead, Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amiga freaks - you officially have permission to obsess over Be now.

  6. Fuck me gently with a chainsaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Totally agree -- I really can't imagine what Gateway was thinking when they did this. And especially that they held onto it so long when they've really had their hands full in the regular PC market.

  7. is that the title to the next Katz article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  8. is there anything left but the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like, are any of the original amiga people there? is there anything left other than a name? a meaningless and empty name like if some actor suddenly decided to call herself "steve mcqueen" well its just not the same now is it... is there anything even of the same spirit in this? as far as i can tell the amiga spirit is alive and kicking in the basements of the world and it doesnt care what name you give it.

    1. Re:is there anything left but the name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amiga was much more popular outside the USA. It still has a lot of active users (as any web search will tell you) but not as many as there used to be. If done right, the existing user base could be grown into a much larger community. That's a big if. Amiga is back where it started: run by people who love it but do not have deep financial pockets to support it.

  9. ...open source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that Amino/Amiga have rights to the OS, open source would be the next logical step, to encourage improvement of the existing OS and to more easily transition to the QNX kernel. Amino has been pushing an open platform they call AQUA (Amiga QNX something Architecture?); I gather it will be aimed at creating a platform which is not owned by any one company but which will put together different parts (Amiga, QNX, IBM's open sourced PowerPC motherboards, etc) to create a successor to the existing Amiga platform and its associated userbase and legacy software.

    1. Re:...open source? by jafuser · · Score: 1
      Amino has been pushing an open platform they call AQUA (Amiga QNX something Architecture?);

      Amino QNX United Architectture

      There's an interesting interview with much discussion about it at http://www.williams.demon.co.uk/seal/fleecyint2.ht ml.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  10. Just in time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was close! Almost made it out of the 1900's without yet another Amiga story! The soap opera continues.

  11. Any functional remnants of Commodore in Amiga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL *today* is still similar in many ways to Quantum Link on the 64. Is there anything of Commodore functionality, hardware architecture, etc. still present in Amiga computers?

    1. Re:Any functional remnants of Commodore in Amiga? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course AOL looks like QuantumLink, where do you think AOL came from?

  12. Legal action against gateway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I heard rumor a while back, after Jim Collas lied and turned his back and ran, that there was going to be some sort of class-action suit against Gateway?!? I wonder if this is even possible... but it seems that it could very well be. Gateway, and Collas, in particular, made quite a few "promises" to quite a few people, and then never followed through on them and literally abandoned ship...

    Opinions?

    1. Re:Legal action against gateway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, class action. yeah 20 people. give it up, it's dead. d. e. a. d. dead. jeez. stop flogging a dead horse.

  13. AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flame bait for sure, but does whatever happens to amiga really matter that much? I really DON'T get it. I am totally clueless about it. I mean it must be a very religious experience using amigas, since I am totally clueless why some folks foam at the mouth over amiga news.

    Let's see ... what was the last count of amigas on a LAN/Internet/WAN?

    first it was beating a dead horse now it is beating a dead ghost?

    oh well....it is truely amazing.

    1. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's flame bait to wonder why Amiga users foam at the mouth. The truth is, many of us have pondered that question to each other several times over the usegroups. Unfortunately, there has never been a clear answer. To really understand it requires that you use it. Its a system that can grow and can do things in a very natural and intuitive manner. It doesn't require "Amiga for Dummies" books, or "Amiga Unleashed" manuals either. It is so damn flexible, that I challenge anyone to find amongst the many Amiga owners, two systems that act alike. The only thing you can chnage on a Windows box is the damn theme. After that it's pretty much business as usual. The Amiga is almost like a canvas that allows you to create the environment that works best for "YOU" without constraints or boundaries. The most amazing part is that this magic is being done on machines that were designed many many many moons ago. The fact that it cannot run at full speed many of the format that were designed for other platforms like mpeg movies and jpgs often overshadows the true fact that using the Amiga specific formats, we were doing full motion video years prior with CDXL. Our picture format load in a snap using OUR format of IFF. not to mention our ANIM formats. Yes, we a behind in a few areas now, but not bad for a machine designed in 1985. Try one and you'll understand. Read about it and you'll never understand. -Alex Chaney achaney@voicenet.com

    2. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If the Amiga had lasted until today,
      if !?

      > I hardware for doing MPEG-2 video and mp3 audio compression/decompression in real time
      thats already possible both with software and hardware.

      > 3D acceleration for video, support for multiple monitors
      Where did you live the last few years ?!
      afair, Amiga had the first multimonitor system.
      Remember screens!? pushing the l-amiga m or that funky icon in the upper-right corner ?
      it has been possible to use more than one monitor since the first gfx card appeared.
      And you can have any number of them in your computer. Not limited by irq's etc.
      As for 3D acceleration, we have Permedia2 :P

      > multiple channels for CD quality sound
      The original amiga had 4-channel stereo sound. And nowadays you can buy a (TADAA!) 16-bit soundcard. f*** fantastic.

      > running on the fastest available processor (PowerPC no doubt)
      We currently have 603/604 powerpc processors, waiting for G4.

      > support for multiple processors
      linux ?

      > DVD support, ....
      As for reading the disk, it is possible. But i doubt that current amiga hardware would be able to decrypt and play dvd mpeg in a decent speed.

      > take whatever else that's cool and going to be available Real Soon Now, and the Amiga would probably already have done it.
      Yeah, Amiga forever!

      BIGFoot.

    3. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      afair, Amiga had the first multimonitor system.

      Are you sure? IIRC, the Mac II in 1987 supported a single desktop spread over up to six monitors (and probably more with external NuBus expansion boxes).

      The original Amiga (the 1000) was a wonderful machine, far better than anything else in 1985, but the Mac II pushed ahead of it in a lot of areas (though price certainly wasn't one of them). On balance, I have fond memories of both of them, and it's difficult to say which was more revolutionary in its day. Unfortunately, the PC architecture continued to improve, and eventually bypassed both Mac and Amiga in terms of performance, and certainly in terms of price. It's a pity it's still got so much legacy crap (e.g. ISA), but it looks like USB may help to bring about a new, legacy-free PC architecure. If that happens, the PC will have finally triumphed all round. In my mind, however, it will never have the elegance of an Amiga 1000 or a Mac II.

    4. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by matthewd · · Score: 1

      I think it matters mainly for the prospect of having another alternative platform from which to choose...

      The Amiga was an elegant platform, for a more civilized age...

      The potential of the Amiga is what keeps it alive; the potential of a computer with advanced hardware for multimedia capabilities, standard file formats published for multimedia, a decent and reliable GUI and multitasking operating system (built on top of an architecture that did interrupt-driven I/O, no busy looping bringing the machine to a crawl), a common scripting and interprocess communication language for all applications, a nice (somewhat quirky) command line interface, which you could replace with another shell if you want. That's what the Amiga was at its height.

      I may be dating myself ;) but I did C programming on the Amiga 3000 for my computer science classes, and it was preferable to the Sun workstations the university had. And the source code was portable as well, so I could recompile on the Suns or the Vax as I remember with no changes to the source.

      If the Amiga had lasted until today, I can only imagine how far it would be right now: hardware for doing MPEG-2 video and mp3 audio compression/decompression in real time, 3D acceleration for video, support for multiple monitors, multiple channels for CD quality sound, running on the fastest available processor (PowerPC no doubt), support for multiple processors, DVD support, .... take whatever else that's cool and going to be available Real Soon Now, and the Amiga would probably already have done it.

      The Amiga been out of the picture for so long it's doubtful that it could make a meaningful comeback, unless the OS is open-sourced and this allows it to gain enough momentum... There is a movement around to do this... It would also be an interesting idea to see if it's feasible to open source the hardware, and perhaps the ultimate computer architecture for the 00's could come out of this as well...

    5. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by matthewd · · Score: 1

      Of course Amigas have lasted until today. But no single company has marketed, promoted, and developed the platform for how long?

      I must admit I've been out of touch with the Amiga 3rd party market for a while...

      Can you provide a URL to a company that is producing MPEG-2/mp3 hardware based codecs for the Amiga? Certainly if a hardware based MPEG-2 decompression were available, DVDs should be playable.

      3rd party graphics cards and sound cards are all well and good, but the problem is the lack of support by and/or tight integration with the OS. I seem to remember that some of that improved with the later graphics cards....

      If the Amiga platform had continued to progress, I would have expected to see advances in the multimedia coprocessors like I described...

      I imagine a machine that you would be able to call on your telephone and say "Record the X-Files tonight. And see if there are any new songs from my favorite artists on mp3.com." This is possible right now, theoretically. There are are all these pieces floating around out there, but no one platform has everything...if the Amiga had stayed ahead of its time, I think it would have everything.

      I want a true multimedia computer--cable ready, CD & DVD, with a reliable OS, good support in terms of 3rd party applications, real time MPEG2 encode/decode in hardware (video in & out of course), voice recognition through mic or telephone input, AutoConfig, multiple monitors--2 by default so it can support display on both a TV and a monitor simultaneously, multiple processors, compatibility with a wide range of add-ons (PCI, USB, FireWire support?)

      Did I leave anything out? I don't ask for much do I?

    6. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? by rent · · Score: 1

      Amiga was a computer designed for games. Therefore it is easy to play games on the amiga, you just wack the disk in and go! You don't require any "Amiga for Dummies" books, or "Amiga Unleashed" manuals for that either..

      And you are also comparing the Amiga as a hardware platform to Windows which is a software platform. This is wrong comparison, because you are missing the fact that the PC hardware platform is much more customizable than the Amiga platform. There is also a greater choice of Operating Systems and software that you can use on the PC and even Windows is technologically more advanced than Kickstart/Workbench.

      Get with the times.

  14. Re:I want Atari! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear ya brother!!

  15. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy Siliconfruit? Buy iMacDV? ;)

  16. Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed that the Amiga name is worth anything anymore to anyone.

  17. So, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?

  18. Re:You're sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, now look what you've done, A.C.

    I see the lick of flames coming closer to the tinderbox.

  19. Amiga RULES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the nicest news I have heard in a long time.. and a great beggining of the next millennium, there Amiga will RULES like it always has done before.. Way to go!

  20. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, I used to do the same thing (boot from RAM) all the time on Macs. I wonder if there's a BIOS limitation on PCs which prevents persistent RAM drives. Unless the RAM loses power, its contents should remain intact, yet, curiously, no PC OSes offer persistent RAM drives (as far as I know).

  21. Atari not quite dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there's a company in Germany (Milan, I think) which makes an Atari TOS (ST,TT,Falcon) clone. Granted, it's a tiny market and its user base is not as large as, nor as vocal as, nor as organized (if that is the right word) as the Amiga community. But it is still viable enough for a few companies to make some money off of it. I believe the latest version of Milan has leased the rights to use the Atari name, but Hasbro still holds the Atari copyrights and trademarks. There's still some activity in the Atari Usenet groups. Hell, there's still activity in the GEOS newsgroups on Usenet...GEOS (under the New Deal Office name) is still a viable desktop OS (albeit a niche one). There are a lot of OS's out there that people think are extinct which still have active user groups.

    1. Re:Atari not quite dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .there's a company in Germany (Milan, I think) You must be living in New-York, Africa.

  22. Hmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Amiga was a computer designed for games." Umm, and now they say that alternative platforms are not viable because there are not enough modern games available to play on them! Hence gamers must use Windows. Well, in fact the Amiga was, and still is, used by video professionals and animators (SeaQuest, Babylon 5). Not bad for a "computer designed for games" whose last official upgrade was in the early 90's. "PC hardware platform is much more customizable than the Amiga platform." Not true. Amigas have been hacked and modified to an extent unimaginable in the PC world; the problem with the Amiga is not upgrades and expandibility. The problem is that upgrades cost too much due to the tiny size of the remaining userbase.

    1. Re:Hmmm..... by rent · · Score: 1

      Modern games? You mean those 2D platform scrollers? You did not convince me on that point, and you never will. These days, machines that are designed for games blow the amiga out of the water and the games on these platforms are so realistic that they allow you to get more into the game in grater detail then ever before.. a far cry from those blocky pixel blobs that you call Turrican 2!

      I know that the Amiga was used for the editing of titles in SeaQuest, Babylon 5, but was it done in REAL TIME??

      I agree that the amiga possibly has a lot more hacked up hardware available then any other platform. This is largely thanks to the bright ingenuity of the nostalgic amiga community...

      When I said customized, I did not mean hacked up by John Doe in his tin-shed at home. I meant commercial hardware that is available in the store. Another point I want to make is that the PC was DESIGNED to be expandable and upgradable more so than the Amiga.

      Amiga is dead. Get with the times. If you still use it exclusively, then I'm happy for you. Just do not spread bullshit hype on how brilliant it is because it's not.

    2. Re:Hmmm..... by DarkHawke · · Score: 1

      Well, yer dead wrong on the use of Amigas (equipped with NewTek's Video Toaster) on Babylon 5 and SeaQuest. For at least the first two years of both shows, ALL special visual effects were rendered with Amiga computers. Later on, B5 at least moved on to Alpha-based machines running Lightwave, but that was due to the lack of Amiga hardware development and the increasing speed of Alpha chips. You are correct on the comparitive quality of games, for despite valiant efforts by the community, we're still about 3-5 years behind the curve. But I have to also challenge this notion of yours that the "PC" (as if there's only one of them!) was designed to be more expandable and upgradeable than the Amiga. First, as I parenthetically pointed out, it's not as if there's been only ONE "PC" design or motherboard in the last few years. There are commonalities to be sure, but nearly everyone has different specific designs. While you can argue that the PCI bus standard now eclipses the equivalent on the Amiga (Zorro III; gotta love them colorful names!), as far as getting the PCI boards to run with Windoze, well, they don't call it "Plug and Pray" for nothing. "Autoconfiguration" was a fact in the Amiga world in 1987 and still works as seamlessly as it did then. Then there's the ease of CPU swapping. I remember once swapping a 486 for a 386 on a DOS box a while ago, but I don't know if you can do that with Pentiums, and in fact I have severe doubts about being able to do that. The Amiga? Give us a few weeks and we'll be able to plug G4 PowerPC chips into our aged machines just by slipping in a new board. Are Amigas cutting-edge anymore? Of course not! Are we as down and out as you would portray us? Oh, HELL no!

  23. Re:Amiga changing name to Vapor, Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Editor's Note: The above is what is called "humor". Look it up in the dictionary.

    You wish. You're about as humorous as Joe Piscapo. Not even worthy of "nice try".

  24. Amazed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed that the Amiga name is worth anything anymore to anyone.

    Then you must find this story particularly enlightening.

  25. Crazy Idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't Slashdot buy the Amiga? It seems with all the readers here, each contributing a little of their skills and time, the Amiga would return alive and kicking.

    Running AmiLinux of course. :-)

  26. Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, "humor" (so called) about Amiga: Slashdot score 2. That's trolling to the rest of us in userland, esp. if the "humor" is directed against a Slashdot sacred cow.

  27. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such thing as an amiga harddrive, Einstein. Amigas are using normal IDE or SCSI harddrives. duh

  28. It's a BIOS limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also known as "the BIOS scribbles all over memory when you boot"; you know, that "memory test" the BIOS performs?

    1. Re:It's a BIOS limitation by vigi · · Score: 1
      Also known as "the BIOS scribbles all over memory when you boot"; you know, that "memory test" the BIOS performs?

      Memory tests don't need to be destructive. Simply get the old value, test that a certain location can be written and read back, and put back the old value.

      AmigaOS did perform a complete memory check, but it was non-destructive (actually, it had checksums on the most important on-memory structures so it could detect tampering or stomped-over memory).

      It's a pity good concepts that save time and money for the user never catch on. Bad concepts that save time and money to the big guys, obviously, are often forced down your throat without compliments.

  29. Re:Giving up the ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (don't have a log-on yet) In case your not up on the situation, I don't own an amiga right now but as a comment on the lack of product descriptions... Well YOU CAN GET A NEW Amiga with a PPC on board, Amiga Inc. when owned by Gateway actually SHIPPED A PRODUCT called Amiga OS 3.5 which has a kernel that can run fine on a 25 mhz processor. (I know you can with Linux too but this has a GUI too, try running GNOME on a 25 mhz processor, sorry too slow I've tried it on my ol' 386) Flame away but this is the truth! Check out http://www.randomize.com (make new amigaz) for more details, also http://www.amiga.com (find info about amiga 3.5) See you do learn something new everyday --disco_man Send insults/threats via: http://listen.to/disco_man

  30. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats the only rreason we bought them, oggle over the chip names ;)

  31. Re:AMIGA ??? does it really matter? it is religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my A1200 sits here beside my pc, sure its slower in raw grunt but it sure can whip the pcs butt still in alot of areas I use it still I love it still :). My a500 still runs after reading and writing some 10,000+ disks back in the demo swapper days :)

  32. Re:Amino? Reason to celebrate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    re. Backing. I't looks like they've secured pretty good backing. A number of PPl have allready tried to buy in but are being looked at as "gatecrashers ". I for 1 would be very interested in putting something on.

  33. Re:Giving up the ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't really need a product description. The product is fine. just try buying into this. I'ts totally closed. They are not looking for anything "worse luck". These people are GEEEEEEEK's with business sense. I have tried to put cash in for about a year now. but to no avail. They don't want to know.

  34. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    britian is full of sarcastic people too but what does that have to do with slashdot.org?

  35. Ok.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Chainsaw sounds in the background mixed with shrieks of agony...)

    More than happy to please...

  36. I want Atari! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now if we could just get Hasbro to sell the Atari name and trademarks to Milan, we could restart the Amiga vs. Atari flame wars left pending circa 1992 or so....

  37. We'll never see another real Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    It's a shame we'll never really see the Amiga return, if they could only incorporate the best of the Amiga into current machines correctly. It's wasn't the flashy graphics and nice sound that made the Amiga so great. It was the fact that it NEVER ran out, or had a conflict of IRQ's and DMA. It had TRUE plug & play, not the plug and pray we deal with now days. TRUE protected memory. (you could do things like dump the whole OS into a Virtual Ram Drive, reset, and boot out of ram!) The list goes on, of things the Amiga could do, that the IBM will never do, or do as well.

    1. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by C.Lee · · Score: 0

      >One of my favorite "features" of the RAM disk was the ability to
      >complete warm restarts on the machine, which would leave the RAM disk
      >present for booting. Back in the floppy days, having your system disk
      >in RAM and then your games on disk certainly helped and sped things
      >up. I've never found the RAM disk features in other OS' quite as
      >appealing as those in AmigaOS. Oh well.

      Well duh. The reason OS' quite as appealing as those in AmigaOS as you so stupidily put was the simple fact that other OS never *NEEDED* a ramdrive as badly as AmigaOS did. The Amiga floppy and hardrives had to have been some of the most expensive and slowest drives on the face of the planet.

    2. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by mmontour · · Score: 2

      Memory protection was actually one of the big things the Amiga did NOT have (A1000 "write-once" kickstart memory excluded). It was quite common for a user process to step on the memory space of another process or of the operating system. Still, the Amiga did a decent job given the lack of hardware memory management on the 68000.

      Booting from a ramdisk sure was a nice feature. On a 1M A500, I often copied my system floppy into a recoverable ramdisk; after all, why let all that memory go to waste? :)

    3. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Mayor_Quimby · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite "features" of the RAM disk was the ability to complete warm restarts on the machine, which would leave the RAM disk present for booting. Back in the floppy days, having your system disk in RAM and then your games on disk certainly helped and sped things up. I've never found the RAM disk features in other OS' quite as appealing as those in AmigaOS. Oh well.
      ________________

      --
      ________________
      'Diamond' Joe Quimby
    4. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by downix · · Score: 1

      I don't say that we never will see a machine as good if not better than the Amiga in these areas. Just noone has ever really tried to. The technology nowadays would make an Amiga-esque machine could make it even better.
      Not to toot my own horn, but the company I work for is trying something similar, using many of the same tricks and techniques to perfect a much more, interesting system than has been tried before.
      Whoever says that Amiga is the only machine ever capable of being like the Amiga is deluding themselves. It was smart engineering that made the Amiga, and smarter engineering can replace it.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    5. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by Relforn · · Score: 1

      Wow, I haven't heard any Amiga ranting at this level in ages. You've even resurrected the old "Amiga versus IBM" slogan.

      My old Xerox-820 machine could do cool stuff too.

      It didn't have a set of chips named after girls, though.

    6. Re:We'll never see another real Amiga... by plain_english · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant "Amiga Hard Drives" but the additional required hardware to use a hard drive (with a couple of exceptions, onboard A1200 IDE and so on...) News groups are full of sarcastic people, why?

  38. Re:Amiga changing name to Vapor, Inc. by kolla · · Score: 1
    You have obviously missed that Vapor already exists as a company. And yes, they make Amiga software and has so sine 1994 or thereabouts.

    http://www.vapor.com/

  39. Re:Phase5 by DrPsycho · · Score: 1
    Wolf Detrich and Phase5 bragging about their products eons before they ever hit distribution is nothing new. They've become something of a phenomenon in the Amiga world, being infamous for their "promise now, deliver later" attitude. It would appear they enjoy sounding "ahead of the times" by announcing all sorts of radical products... but they don't seem to be quite so advanced when their development timelines start to get extended... and extended... and extended.

    Can you tell I have a real beef with this? I can understand announcing a product in advance to generate interest, but phase5 typically does so about a YEAR in advance, and then takes their announced "anticipated ship dates" and adds MONTHS to them.

    Dammit Wolf, I know there aren't many hardware developers left for the Amiga, but that doesn't give you and your company free reign to jerk us all around.

    /end rant

    --

    -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

  40. Amino? Reason to celebrate? by DrPsycho · · Score: 1
    I think that, while the thought of the Amiga rights being handed over to the Amino group is some of the most positive news Amiga users have heard in a long time, Amiga fans need to bite back their usual rabid enthusiasm. Certainly, Bill and Fleecy aren't going to stand up in the next few days and begin announcing the production of all-new Amiga super computers. There is a lot that has to be done between now and then.

    Amino is a group made up of many people who have been prominent in the Amiga Community. As any wanderings through an Amiga UseNet group will demonstrate, there are multiple opinions about exactly what direction Amiga needs to go in order to innovate and survive in today's market. One of the first things Amino will need to do is come forth with a single coherent direction for the future. That sure as hell isn't happening overnight!

    Secondly, what kind of financial backing does Amino have? Do they have the juice to kick out the kind of development that Amiga users are craving? Maybe not now, but they might develop sufficient fiscal muscle in the future. But until then, we'll probably have to continue the proud Amiga end-user tradition of sitting on our hands waiting for the sun to peek out from the clouds.

    I'm not telling you (other Amigaheads) not to be thrilled at the news. Nor am I trying to be a complete pessimist. We've been burned repeatedly in the past by news developments which serve to inflate our hopes, only to leave us disappointed in the end. You'd think that after so many such experiences, we'd learn to approach each news story with a little more realism/skepticism.

    I wish the Amino group the best of luck. This Amiga 4000 could use some new toys. :^)

    --

    -DrPsycho - Coping with reality since 1975

  41. Re:Giving up the ghost by QuadPro · · Score: 1

    I'll be more interested in Amiga news when there is a product description.

    Oh, the descriptions were there all the time, right since 1994: Amiga with Super DSP, MMC, PPC, whatever...

    The actual *products* however..

  42. Amiga changing name to Vapor, Inc. by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    The new owner of the Amiga brand announced today that they would be changing their name to Vapor, Inc. Company President, Nopra Duct, said it signaled an innovative new strategic direction for the company. "People accuse Microsoft of selling vaporware, but we haven't released a new product in years! That puts Microsoft to shame, and they're the most powerful company in the known universe. Just think where we will be in two years!"

    The company also announced plans for an IPO, including gratuitous use of the words "Internet", "E-Commerce", and "Linux". They plan to trade under the ticker symbol NULL.

    (Editor's Note: The above is what is called "humor". Look it up in the dictionary.)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Amiga changing name to Vapor, Inc. by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Firstly, for the lazy (duck)

      Vapor

      Secondly, they make Internet software.

      Thirdly, yes they have released it and not just announced it :)

      Greg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  43. the chain by serialk · · Score: 1

    its all linked together, dont worry

  44. Giving up the ghost by Brento · · Score: 2

    I'm glad they finally gave up the ghost on that. Let's face it, the Amiga was awesome, but the name wasn't going to sell PC's. I mean, think about it - if you're Gateway, what name do you want to use? Gateway, or Amiga? They've got a heck of a lot of money invested in the Gateway brand, cow spots and all, and they'd be foolish to dilute that investment by adding a second name.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Giving up the ghost by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I'll be more interested in Amiga news when there is a product description.

  45. Umm... duh. by Faere · · Score: 1

    Of course AOL looks like QuantumLink, where do you think AOL came from?

    Umm... duh.

    Thank you, Captain Obvious. Why do you think that the poster mentioned Q*Link in the first place?

  46. It's about time by webview · · Score: 0

    Finally, I know that %s will make the Amiga powerful again.

  47. Re:Probably for the best by metaphysicist · · Score: 1

    In the history of Mankind? I would have thought that, if any wrestler, it would have been the Undertaker. [Ha Ha]

    --


    Metaphysicist

    "If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed"

    - Cu
  48. Phase5 by RickyRay · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know whether Phase5 (www.phase5.de) is really going to build their new equivalents of the Amiga? They've been bragging about such a product for _years_ now, regularly changing the name and extending the introduction date.

  49. A trademark is one thing, where's the technology? by Fross · · Score: 3

    What concerns me (and likely other Amiga enthusiasts too) is the rights for existing and new Amiga technology - are these part of the deal? Will they ever be released? What does a company making an Amiga clone (as several are in development, it seems) have to bear in mind or licence?

    The Amiga still isn't dead, and has a good community, which deserves better support than being shifted from company to company in business deals. How about some new hardware or licencing?

    Fross

  50. What this means.... by downix · · Score: 2

    Gateway still holds the patents, the licences and all of the cards. It did not originally buy Amiga in order to resurrect it, only to gain that technology. But holding those trademarks ment that a gigantic community was built around it, and Gateway had to deal with them. By selling the trademarks and not the patents to Mr McEwan's Amino, they solve that problem. They keep the technology, and loose the community. Amino gains the community and not the technology (except maybe the OS, which is copyrighted not patented)
    This could be good yet.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  51. You're sick! by Darkroom · · Score: 1

    Atari is what I call REALLY dead.

  52. It does really matter. by Darkroom · · Score: 1

    Having choices matter. My Amigas are my main systems, used for WEB, an IP gateway, music, video and others. I've used several other systems and Amiga work for me best.

  53. Probably for the best by Jjaks · · Score: 1

    I guess this was for the best, because Gateway haven't been logical or coherent in their management of Amiga. But then again, who has? The Amiga must be the most mis-managed computer in the history of Man Kind. It's totally unbelievable that such an incredible succession of inept businessmen have laid their greedy hands on the Amiga, just to ruin it a bit more. By now, miracles are needed if the Amiga is to resurrect.

    Sad but true, I'm afraid.

  54. Staying Alive by Baruch · · Score: 1
    Honestly, this is for the best. Why?

    1. It obviously increases the number of companies with any amount of investment in Amiga.

    2. Gateway is a company in flux (i.e. Waitt's departure, etc.). Gateway does some good things, but I don't think Amiga lovers want to rely on them to carry the torch.

    Unfortunately, this doesn't address the primary problem--Amiga needs a prime player (e.g. Dell, Compaq, even a newcomer like Red Hat) to get behind it and push it back into the limelight. As it stands, I fear that as the months pass without any new Amiga hardware or major developments, the Amiga becomes increasingly marginalized, cool as it is/was.

  55. A change for the better? by steliosk · · Score: 2

    It was about time Gateway let the people involved in the "Classic" (daft title, I know) REAL Amiga community get on with developing the successors to this elegant platform. Personally, I think it was about time there were some positive Amiga news, and I think this is the best piece of info I heard in a long time.

    Stelios Kalogreades