And what if the Syrian rebels were using those chemical weapons? The US government seems unwilling to investigate that option, even unwilling to let the UN investigate this. They have only one prefered outcome. Judging from Kerry's speech they don't even to bother to produce fake evidence like in Iraq.
You're NOT supposed to be the worlds police force. Especially not when there seems to be no proof Assad used those weapons. Kerry's speach was even worse than that of Colin Powell about WMD in Iraq, at least Powell tried to show the falsified "evidence".
Everyone outside the US, and some Americans too, understand that attacking Syria has much to do with oil, pipelines, Israel and scoring orders for American companies who donate to election campaigns. It has nothing to do with moral standards.
In most EU countries this information has to be provided when calling the number. When I call a 0900 number I always get a tape "this number costs X cents per minute plus possible airtime on your mobile". When you hang up when the tape plays you're not charged.
Some poor people become pot dealers, some become telemarketeers. The difference between those two is that there is an actual demand for the services of the first.
Harder to hit? Rwanda was a clear-case example where ground troops were needed, bombing from high altitude planes would be useless against civilians killing other civilians. The only air support needed there would be transportation.
He has a better record of not telling lies than a US government spokesman. Let the US prove anything, and please more convincing this time than those nukes they knew that were in Iraq.
At least, if they can sort out the artificial mess lawyers will make of it. In other parts of the world, most people don't even buy cars with automatic transmissions (it has been over 10 years ago I drived an automatic transmission myself, when I borrowed my fathers car) but do it manually. Those systems are cheaper and more robust anyway. Self driving cars are a big step further, which most people will not want to use.
I'm not saying it would justify saying everything Obama did was right, but it would justify voting for him. Since the republicans nowadays seem to be fundamentalist nutjobs the choice is bad or worse.
when you can download them on The Pirate Bay and other sites for free?
Man, I wish there were tablets and modern internet when I studied. It would have saved me a lot of money on books and a lot of carrying bags with heavy books in it.
I use multiple: AdBlock Plus and Ghostery in my browser, a hosts file and since I'm using Peerblock anyway to block the RIAA and cronies from my torrent client I added an ads blocklist there too.
Which means that they can't be trusted with all those NSA programs going on. I'd prefer Chinese network equipment over US by now, especially if the company has any US competitors. The Chinese only care wether I deal with the Dalai Lama, if you don't you're much safer there.
If you are a western internet company it is nowadays good marketing practice to empathise you're NOT from the US.
None other than a search warrant. And destroying possible evidence before they knock on the door (or even fleeing through the back door with it when they enter the front door) is not a crime on itself. Usually companies comply with demands because otherwise the tax service can make their live terrible but the real scan companies usually don't.
Subphoena's are something typical for US law. In The Netherlands, the police can come search for evidence but I'm not required to give them anything and if they can't find it it's bad for them. Not giving information voluntarily is not a crime here.
Slashdot Mirror
And what if the Syrian rebels were using those chemical weapons? The US government seems unwilling to investigate that option, even unwilling to let the UN investigate this. They have only one prefered outcome. Judging from Kerry's speech they don't even to bother to produce fake evidence like in Iraq.
You're NOT supposed to be the worlds police force. Especially not when there seems to be no proof Assad used those weapons. Kerry's speach was even worse than that of Colin Powell about WMD in Iraq, at least Powell tried to show the falsified "evidence".
Everyone outside the US, and some Americans too, understand that attacking Syria has much to do with oil, pipelines, Israel and scoring orders for American companies who donate to election campaigns. It has nothing to do with moral standards.
In most EU countries this information has to be provided when calling the number. When I call a 0900 number I always get a tape "this number costs X cents per minute plus possible airtime on your mobile". When you hang up when the tape plays you're not charged.
Some poor people become pot dealers, some become telemarketeers. The difference between those two is that there is an actual demand for the services of the first.
The US doesn't do much to improve the UN security council too, blocking every possible action against Israel.
Harder to hit? Rwanda was a clear-case example where ground troops were needed, bombing from high altitude planes would be useless against civilians killing other civilians. The only air support needed there would be transportation.
He has a better record of not telling lies than a US government spokesman. Let the US prove anything, and please more convincing this time than those nukes they knew that were in Iraq.
Same holds for christians.
The GUI didn't change much between 0.9.x and 1.0.0, only a few minor changes.
That's always preferable to the freedom for everyone to buy guns.
You can take a taxi.
Some people think that change is good for its own sake. That line of thought brought uw windows 8, Gnome 3 and Unity. Most people disagree.
At least, if they can sort out the artificial mess lawyers will make of it. In other parts of the world, most people don't even buy cars with automatic transmissions (it has been over 10 years ago I drived an automatic transmission myself, when I borrowed my fathers car) but do it manually. Those systems are cheaper and more robust anyway. Self driving cars are a big step further, which most people will not want to use.
Not filtering out the names of the traitors who spy for the US is good, now they can be properly imprisoned or executed.
The advantage of a hosts file is that it works for every application, not just for a webbrowser.
I'm not saying it would justify saying everything Obama did was right, but it would justify voting for him. Since the republicans nowadays seem to be fundamentalist nutjobs the choice is bad or worse.
I think they are affraid that the alternative for Obama was even worse.
However, telling inconvenient thruths seems to be illegal there. Even if you're not American and don't even live there (Assange).
when you can download them on The Pirate Bay and other sites for free?
Man, I wish there were tablets and modern internet when I studied. It would have saved me a lot of money on books and a lot of carrying bags with heavy books in it.
I use multiple: AdBlock Plus and Ghostery in my browser, a hosts file and since I'm using Peerblock anyway to block the RIAA and cronies from my torrent client I added an ads blocklist there too.
That is because, according to the US, foreigners have no rights, so there's nothing to break.
Which means that they can't be trusted with all those NSA programs going on. I'd prefer Chinese network equipment over US by now, especially if the company has any US competitors. The Chinese only care wether I deal with the Dalai Lama, if you don't you're much safer there.
If you are a western internet company it is nowadays good marketing practice to empathise you're NOT from the US.
That still doesn't make it legal (that may depend on your jurisdiction), but it will of course seriously reduce the chance of getting caught.
None other than a search warrant. And destroying possible evidence before they knock on the door (or even fleeing through the back door with it when they enter the front door) is not a crime on itself. Usually companies comply with demands because otherwise the tax service can make their live terrible but the real scan companies usually don't.
Subphoena's are something typical for US law. In The Netherlands, the police can come search for evidence but I'm not required to give them anything and if they can't find it it's bad for them. Not giving information voluntarily is not a crime here.