Remember, folks, Iran's apparently nuclear weapon program, while not illegal in any sense
Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Under that treaty, they are legally restricted from developing nuclear weapons and legally required to allow the IAEA to monitor any nuclear program that they did have.
If they're pursuing nuclear weaponry, it's clearly illegal.
One of the problems that we have to face is that CAFE moved people out of relatively efficient cars and into inefficient trucks.
GM and Ford drastically cut back large car production and directed those resources into trucks due to some quirks* of CAFE.
The upshot is that if you need a car that holds more than 2 adults and 2 kids, it's easier (and cheaper) to find what you want on the SUV side of the house.
I'm totally behind increasing the gas tax. At the same time, we should repeal CAFE and let GM and Ford build what they can build where they can build it.
*I can elaborate, but I'll abstain unless asked.
I thought HughesNet used the satellite for the download side and POTS for the upload side.
If that's the case, you're still screwed when the phone line is down.
Yes. The trite summary is that a blind moron with a Celsius room temperature IQ could have seen that the US federal government was going to helicopter cash out to states to pay for voting "upgrades" following the fiasco in Florida during the 2000 election.
Diebold had a (small) division in South America that did voting machines, but they felt it was better to buy a local company. That company is the fucked up one, with the Microsoft Access, and the antivirus* and the glavens.
*Yes, Randall is a smart guy, but the antivirus in question wasn't running on the voting machines, it was running on the central server. ISTR that in that particular instance, the votes had actually been cast on Scantron style paper ballots.
This assumes that all new tactics are 100% effective. You can cherrypick examples where new tactics triumphed over old, but there's also a shitload of dead people out there who died because people tried new tactics that didn't work.
Bringing the parent back to the real world, this means that Iran has crunched the rules of war and come up with a working strategy. What would have happened if the rules had changed in the middle of the game? In the Eurisko case, that doesn't make sense. But what if, in a USN vs. Iran tangle, the USN decides they've had enough and change the rules to target a refinery or shipping port or two and then withdraw.
As I understand it, the sanctions are used to punish violations of international law. Yes, Iran is allowed to pursue civilian nuclear power under the NPT. At the same time, the NPT places obligations on them that they have been shirking.
Nuclear weapons are good for Iran in that they give the regime the power you're suggesting WRT brinksmanship. However, they're bad for Iran in that actually possessing them will touch off a nuclear arms race in the region as other powers will want the same guarantees in dealing with Iran. That would be a massive blow to stability not just in the region, but world-wide.
Their primary naval weapon is a missile that can get into ballistic mode before a ship's countermeasure can intercept it.
I'm not sure what you're after there. A ballistic missile is one that follows a suborbital path (shitloads of power in the boost phase, and gravity and minor steering after).
Even leaving that aside, AFAIK, the only serious countermeasure that the USN has for unguided missiles is Phalanx. I would think that relatively slow, small, unguided missiles* would be meat for the Phalanx. You could probably overwhelm the system, but that assumes the USN has no way to deal with said speedboats *cough* artillery *cough*
Hell, you don't even have to hit the boats -- just throw up enough of a barrage that they don't get a stable platform long enough to take a shot.
*The kind of MLRS that fits on a single engine fiberglass boat doesn't lend itself to having large munitions.
Wasn't it George Carlin that had the bit about adding dart guns to cars? When some guy did something wrong, you'd shoot a dart at his car, and when he got to 3 darts, the cops would pull him over for being an asshole.
Fishing in the Western Central Pacific is highly governed. The WCPFC, which is a treaty organization that includes Japan*, regulates what can and cannot be done in this part of the Pacific.
AFAIK, the WCPFC does limit whaling (and catch of other mammals).
*Japan is nice enough to send a lot of money to WCPFC
It is a curious fact, and one to which no one knows quite how much importance to attach, that something like 85% of all known worlds in the Galaxy, be they primitive or highly advanced, have invented a drink called jynnan tonnyx, or gee-N'N-T'N-ix, or jinond-o-nicks, or any one of a thousand or more variations on the same phonetic theme. The drinks themselves are not the same, and vary between the Sivolvian 'chinanto/mnigs' which is ordinary water served at slightly above room temperature, and the Gagrakackan 'tzjin-anthony-ks' which kill cows at a hundred paces; and in fact the one common factor between all of them, beyond the fact that the names sound the same, is that they were all invented and named before the worlds concerned made contact with any other worlds.
I understand you're trying to be funny, but billionaires do not typically pay almost nothing. The (in)famous Warren Buffett says that he's paying a lower rate, not a lower amount.
As another example, Theresa Heinz-Kerry had to release her returns when her husband was running for president. She paid $627k in federal income taxes on $2.3 million of AGI. How is $627k "almost nothing"?
Puhleez!
What is necessary is density that Americans won't put up with and mass transit proponents who don't get pointless hard-ons for trains over busses.
Mass transit makes sense in the dense cities that have always had mass transit (e.g. New York, Chicago). Mass transit in sprawling Phoenix or Seattle is just sowing seeds of transit hate.
Hate to break it to you, but we're not living out "Fight Club".
There are many different alleged "smoking gun" memos, but the one I'm most familiar with is the Ford memo. I won't tell you what you think it said, but I will tell you what it really said: NHTSA allowed that safety improvements that would cost more than $200K per life saved were not cost effective. In 1973, NHTSA wanted to change safety standards to reduce the posibility of a post-rollover fire. Ford then wrote and circulated a memo that showed that the compliance costs for that change were 3x the NHTSA threshold and should be opposed.
Now for me, personally, an appropriate regime would be to have the auto manufacturers put a notice on the steering wheel, to be removed by the first owner, that says "We're insured to $X dollars in the event of death due to a design flaw." If that number is too low for you, buy a different car.
My guess is that this is for people in the "Chair Force", not those at the sharp end. Even if AT&T offers 3G in Kandahar, how far do you think the coverage area is?;)
Wrong. The percentage of income spent on food, housing, clothing, etc. has been declining for at least 30 years.
What has happened is that US consumers have traded that decline in prices for more luxurious goods: Average house size is up ~ 50% since 1980, consumers eat more expensive foods, they eat out more often, they drive cars that are larger and fancier, etc.
His math is actually a little bit off, but when it comes to wealth, anyone that lives in the US is in the top ~12% of the world. Meeting physiological needs takes a tiny fraction of the average US income, which makes it less likely that high Gini coefficients will actually lead to unrest.
The US Gini coefficient is 40 (equivalent to the whole of the EU BTW), but the IPF is essentially 99%.
If the real issue with education is parents, then why the fuck do we have these continual rants that society's failure to pay teachers more is leading to the decline of western civilization?
If it sounds like I'm ranting, well, I am. I'm fucking tired of the teachers unions trying to have it both ways: "Why do you hate education?" when we won't pay them more and "Blame Johnny's parents" when we do and it doesn't amount to shit.
I understand that they're trying to do right for their members -- that's their job. But for FSM's sake, don't wrap that shit in a giant appeal-to-emotion.
Slashdot Mirror
Remember, folks, Iran's apparently nuclear weapon program, while not illegal in any sense
Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Under that treaty, they are legally restricted from developing nuclear weapons and legally required to allow the IAEA to monitor any nuclear program that they did have.
If they're pursuing nuclear weaponry, it's clearly illegal.
One of the problems that we have to face is that CAFE moved people out of relatively efficient cars and into inefficient trucks. GM and Ford drastically cut back large car production and directed those resources into trucks due to some quirks* of CAFE. The upshot is that if you need a car that holds more than 2 adults and 2 kids, it's easier (and cheaper) to find what you want on the SUV side of the house. I'm totally behind increasing the gas tax. At the same time, we should repeal CAFE and let GM and Ford build what they can build where they can build it. *I can elaborate, but I'll abstain unless asked.
I thought HughesNet used the satellite for the download side and POTS for the upload side. If that's the case, you're still screwed when the phone line is down.
Yes. The trite summary is that a blind moron with a Celsius room temperature IQ could have seen that the US federal government was going to helicopter cash out to states to pay for voting "upgrades" following the fiasco in Florida during the 2000 election.
Diebold had a (small) division in South America that did voting machines, but they felt it was better to buy a local company. That company is the fucked up one, with the Microsoft Access, and the antivirus* and the glavens.
*Yes, Randall is a smart guy, but the antivirus in question wasn't running on the voting machines, it was running on the central server. ISTR that in that particular instance, the votes had actually been cast on Scantron style paper ballots.
This assumes that all new tactics are 100% effective. You can cherrypick examples where new tactics triumphed over old, but there's also a shitload of dead people out there who died because people tried new tactics that didn't work. Bringing the parent back to the real world, this means that Iran has crunched the rules of war and come up with a working strategy. What would have happened if the rules had changed in the middle of the game? In the Eurisko case, that doesn't make sense. But what if, in a USN vs. Iran tangle, the USN decides they've had enough and change the rules to target a refinery or shipping port or two and then withdraw.
As I understand it, the sanctions are used to punish violations of international law. Yes, Iran is allowed to pursue civilian nuclear power under the NPT. At the same time, the NPT places obligations on them that they have been shirking.
Nuclear weapons are good for Iran in that they give the regime the power you're suggesting WRT brinksmanship. However, they're bad for Iran in that actually possessing them will touch off a nuclear arms race in the region as other powers will want the same guarantees in dealing with Iran. That would be a massive blow to stability not just in the region, but world-wide.
Their primary naval weapon is a missile that can get into ballistic mode before a ship's countermeasure can intercept it. I'm not sure what you're after there. A ballistic missile is one that follows a suborbital path (shitloads of power in the boost phase, and gravity and minor steering after). Even leaving that aside, AFAIK, the only serious countermeasure that the USN has for unguided missiles is Phalanx. I would think that relatively slow, small, unguided missiles* would be meat for the Phalanx. You could probably overwhelm the system, but that assumes the USN has no way to deal with said speedboats *cough* artillery *cough* Hell, you don't even have to hit the boats -- just throw up enough of a barrage that they don't get a stable platform long enough to take a shot. *The kind of MLRS that fits on a single engine fiberglass boat doesn't lend itself to having large munitions.
Wasn't it George Carlin that had the bit about adding dart guns to cars? When some guy did something wrong, you'd shoot a dart at his car, and when he got to 3 darts, the cops would pull him over for being an asshole.
Fishing in the Western Central Pacific is highly governed. The WCPFC, which is a treaty organization that includes Japan*, regulates what can and cannot be done in this part of the Pacific.
AFAIK, the WCPFC does limit whaling (and catch of other mammals).
*Japan is nice enough to send a lot of money to WCPFC
The transcontinental railroad and the interstate highway system were built by the WPA?
Cassandra can do it but it doesn't have the ability to deal with arbitrarily large binary objects.
Where did I put that Z-machine compiler again...?
Meh, Douglas Adams has 'em beat:
How dare those Indians! If they actually wanted to eat they should have had the good sense to be born in America just like me.
I understand you're trying to be funny, but billionaires do not typically pay almost nothing. The (in)famous Warren Buffett says that he's paying a lower rate, not a lower amount. As another example, Theresa Heinz-Kerry had to release her returns when her husband was running for president. She paid $627k in federal income taxes on $2.3 million of AGI. How is $627k "almost nothing"?
Puhleez! What is necessary is density that Americans won't put up with and mass transit proponents who don't get pointless hard-ons for trains over busses. Mass transit makes sense in the dense cities that have always had mass transit (e.g. New York, Chicago). Mass transit in sprawling Phoenix or Seattle is just sowing seeds of transit hate.
Hate to break it to you, but we're not living out "Fight Club". There are many different alleged "smoking gun" memos, but the one I'm most familiar with is the Ford memo. I won't tell you what you think it said, but I will tell you what it really said: NHTSA allowed that safety improvements that would cost more than $200K per life saved were not cost effective. In 1973, NHTSA wanted to change safety standards to reduce the posibility of a post-rollover fire. Ford then wrote and circulated a memo that showed that the compliance costs for that change were 3x the NHTSA threshold and should be opposed. Now for me, personally, an appropriate regime would be to have the auto manufacturers put a notice on the steering wheel, to be removed by the first owner, that says "We're insured to $X dollars in the event of death due to a design flaw." If that number is too low for you, buy a different car.
Magnuson-Moss, which has been on the books for nearly 40 years, already makes most of what you are pissing and moaning about illegal.
My guess is that this is for people in the "Chair Force", not those at the sharp end. Even if AT&T offers 3G in Kandahar, how far do you think the coverage area is? ;)
That's strange. I use my Streak 5 to make voice calls all the time and have since the moment I pulled it out of the box.
The Streak 7, although still an Android device, makes you work harder to unlock the phone capabilities.
Wrong. The percentage of income spent on food, housing, clothing, etc. has been declining for at least 30 years. What has happened is that US consumers have traded that decline in prices for more luxurious goods: Average house size is up ~ 50% since 1980, consumers eat more expensive foods, they eat out more often, they drive cars that are larger and fancier, etc.
His math is actually a little bit off, but when it comes to wealth, anyone that lives in the US is in the top ~12% of the world. Meeting physiological needs takes a tiny fraction of the average US income, which makes it less likely that high Gini coefficients will actually lead to unrest. The US Gini coefficient is 40 (equivalent to the whole of the EU BTW), but the IPF is essentially 99%.
It's a Guy Fawkes mask? I guess that explains my confusion at why people were dressed as Jack White.
If the real issue with education is parents, then why the fuck do we have these continual rants that society's failure to pay teachers more is leading to the decline of western civilization? If it sounds like I'm ranting, well, I am. I'm fucking tired of the teachers unions trying to have it both ways: "Why do you hate education?" when we won't pay them more and "Blame Johnny's parents" when we do and it doesn't amount to shit. I understand that they're trying to do right for their members -- that's their job. But for FSM's sake, don't wrap that shit in a giant appeal-to-emotion.