I'm always amazed about how ignorant people are about the system.
Yes, you do have a timed learning system, but you crucially forget that the time scales logarithmically but the bonuses are linear. You can spend a quarter the time skilling and achieve over 90% of the same performance as someone who's skilled for years. That last 10% can easily be made up by skill, some planning, or a friend.
The second thing is the obsession with T2 ships being OMGPWNZRS. You can credibly fight with a basic T1 frigate or cruiser for much lower cost and time investment. Hell, you can even make it a profitable proposition with some planning. Lost your ship? No matter, the insurance payout is more than the cost to buy and fit it! Can't do that with T2 in the least. T2 ships are specialized beasts. They do one thing and do it well, but at a penalty at doing anything else, and at a much, MUCH higher cost. You know what the most popular frigate is to go out and kick ass? It's the Rifter, a basic T1 frigate that you can be flying in less than three hours. With bad attributes.
Thirdly, guess what, there is only a fininte amount of skills that can help with anything. Myself, I have almost 70m skillpoints. Ooh I should be a combat monster. But I'm not. Most of it is industrial skills for manufacturing. Want to fly and make others die? You can have a character that can whomp me in less than six months by yourself. Fly with a friend and you can be in that same postion in perhaps a month.
But hey, what do I know about this anyways? I'm just a manufacturer....
Seconded on that. I buy hardcover Sci-Fi novels (certianly not mainstream like a Dan Brown novel), and regular price on them is around 38-40 CDN. And yet somehow, I can get a good fraction off that book if I have a club card. If I order it ONLINE (something that strips out the regular brick and mortar costs of sales and distribution) I can regularily save 40% or more from that price.
And somehow the publishers and major bookstores aren't going out of business as a result.
And just to really drive a nail in this coffin, one can always go to Baen's and see how they run a publishing house that somehow dosen't manage to implode...
Re:Finished it... Good game, but horrid planet sca
on
Review: Mass Effect 2
·
· Score: 1
Given that the ME1 exploration system was grappling with the Mako and getting to some of the deposits was a cast-iron nightmare and EASILY took longer than five minutes, I think the scanning mechanic is far better. Unless you enjoyed driving over jagged terrain that made your rattle like a can in a paint mixer...
Like paperwork and administration, a weapon as you see it is always a dead loss. Until something unexpected happens and you need proof, or in the case of the military, defence.
You don't do it or support it all the time because it ALWAYS provides a benefit; you support/do it all the time because when something goes pear shaped out of your control, you have something that can deal with it/cover your ass.
So you're walking around on a 2d plane shooting and doing effects without having a hitscan in the environment? Interesting.
While the ship models in EVE are static (though gun turrets aboard do rotate), the effects they have to generate are considerably more intensive. Just about any activity you do in your ship will have some external visible effect. Repairing armor or shields will result in a visual animation over your hull or shields. Each gun that fires means a single effect just for that. Any remote support, ditto. A logistics ship can be remotely repairing 4-5 ships at once, with a visible effect for each seperate repair signal.
That's a link to one of the tournament fights that CCP put on between player groups. The client HAS been modified, but only to show the health of 20 ships at a time, broken into teams, and to remove the commentator's own ship UI. Other than that, it's legit. That's a small 10v10 battle.
EVE can handle over one thousand players in a single system/"zone". Places like Jita (THE trade hub of EVE) regularily pass 1300 concurrent active users at one time. In one star system. Admittedly though the vast majority of Jita players are "passing through" or conducting trade and not shooting each other in the face. Star systems out in the areas of space where players create their own empires can have fleet battles that push past 400 people per side, though admittedly there are occurences of heavy lag. In the past (IE one year ago or more) this would be instead extreme lag to the point of killing the node. In the last year however they have implemented heavy server and database optimizations that are pushing the boundary of stable large group combat higher and higher. I wish I could have better references, but I know several battles have been fought that were past 300v300 and were done with a minimum of lag (the reason I remember this is because of the comments wondering WHERE the lag was). CCP devs have also stated that they've just begun major DB optimization and they expect greater improvements to come. Of course, that's them selling their product, but they do recognize it is a major issue, and they ARE working towards correcting it.
To turn the question on its head, how many people can a single WOW server handle, in one instance, in one specific zone? All PVPing against each other or providing remote support in one manner or another? Personally I'd be suprised if that number was any higher than what EVE is currently capable of.
To a degree, up here in Canada (lower mainland of Vancouver) the police already monitor power consumption of homes and apartments for marijuana grow ops. One thing that people don't notice/realize is that a grow op actually has a rather specific power signature. Homes with grow-ops are typically yearly rental/lease agreement homes. The growers themselves do not live at the property. The end result is a static high power draw that keeps the lights and hydropondics gear running 24/7. This is VERY different from even the most excessive of home power uses. Unless you're running a commericaial dishwashing/laundry/whatever out of your home that operates 24/7 you're going to have a VERY different bit of power consumption.
Add on to the fact that it's not the only actual investigation technique. Grow Ops are typcailly seldom attended all the time, so some basic surveillance would reveal the difference between you being a power hog and you growing a crop in your basement.
But would you expect ANY sort of technological improvement like this to boost output by 50%?
Yes, why not?
Because pulling percentage growth numbers out of thin air is PHB at its finest. Set the bar at an unrealistic level and you won't get any motivation or progress. Goals have to be at least somewhat realistic and attainable in some manner for them to be actually useful. Otherwise you get something out of a dilbert cartoon.
Such infrastructure improvements can take years to properly pay off dividends, so we may be waiting for some time before we get real results.
I'm not even asking for the improvements to pay off — this is separate from an actual output increase. I just want an appreciable increase — regardless of whether it has (yet) paid for the software — before I get excited.
Fair enough on that.:) With this however, only time will really tell however.
But would you expect ANY sort of technological improvement like this to boost output by 50%? Such infrastructure improvements can take years to properly pay off dividends, so we may be waiting for some time before we get real results. That of course will be attributed to other inputs (either because cause/effect cannot be determined, or because it serves a political master better to have something else as the cause).
This is oddly one of the main things that's driven into my Business Admin degree. In virtually every course we encounter where we have standardized math equations (mainly seen when doing mortgage and other time-value money work) we are introduced to the concepts and we do some questions on paper, and then we're shown how to use our calculator (a basic BA-II+ by TI incidentally) to do the same math. In many cases it's not the student's implementation of their solution that is a problem but instead their math. A simple error in copying a number or some other mundane "oops" that results in them failing a question.
We're taught and trained to understand HOW the calculator does the dirty work so we can recognize when we get an odd answer (the calculator isn't our god after all, just a tool) but we use it to do a LOT of dirty work that vastly speeds up our time. For example, this was a question we had in 3rd year finance. It's not the ONLY question in the exam, I should add. Certainly not the hardest. Anyhow, a pizzeria has the option to buy a new oven or keep the current one. We have to take ALL the cash flows for the next 5 years on both options, bring them back to the present, as well as disposal costs and returns, amortizations, tax shields and more. With a non-linear cash flow to boot. Want to bet how many people did that stuff by hand?
Yeah. Not many.
Does anyone know if WotC has done a big buyback? It almost seems like someone has been scouring the bookstores methodically, snatching up everything that would suggest an older edition ever existed.
I can't speak for other places, but I ended up talking with several local game store owners in my neck of the woods. From what I've been able to piece together, a fairly self-reinforcing cycle kicked in about the same time they announced 4e:
1) 4e announced, fanbase is split as some embrace the expansion, others see possible writing on wall and begin buying 3.5e stuff where they can. Some hobby stores begin discounting 3.5e in order to clear out "old inventory".
2) As more people begin to grab 3.5 stuff, sales in local stores of said increase, outpacing 4e sales noticeably. Stores put in restock orders to local distributors. Lower margin per item is compensated by higher volume sales, so local stores wish to keep items in stock as much as possible.
3) WoTC notices that 3.5 demand is higher than 4e. They then conduct a buyback at the distributor level (this is what happened in my neghborhood. WoTC bought back, at almost retail IIRC, all of their own 3.5e product). Distributors inform local stores that they have no more WoTC stock in inventory and will not be receiving more.
4) Locals discover 3.5 isn't getting restocked, many core books are cleaned out and several secondary markets are also cleaned.
End result: 3.5e stuff is virtually gone except for several niche stores that only stocked it as a secondary product (I've found myself hitting Chapters stores, Goth clothing and miscellaneous stores, and other out of the way locations to pick up various 3.5 stuff).
That doing anything by yourself in EVE is going to be boring, unless you're somewhat antisocial (which is suprising... would've thought Zero was right in the middle of that category).
In a lot of ways it's like playing Clue with only one other person. You can do it, but you lose so much of the game that you ought to wonder why...
I don't think the Japanese were completely over matched. Especially at the beginning of the war. A lot of the reason the US did as well as it did was due to nothing more than luck. Certainly not all allied victories were, but there were some very decisive battles that were mostly luck. I don't think the US wanted to have to deal with such a industrious and determined enemy again in the foreseeable future. I certainly agree that surrender on Japans terms would keep them from looking like "spineless weenies". However not allowing Japan to do so, was much more disgraceful to such an admirable people and was a way to avoid allowing them to dress their wounds and try again.
Actually, the Japanese were completely outmatched. Yamamoto stated that he could "run wild for one year, eighteen months at most" but after that, he would not be able to garuntee anything. Just comparing industrial output, the disparity was sickening. By 1944, the US had 41.7% of TOTAL military output, worldwide. The US army and navy did as well as it did by weight of their numbers and the tenacity of forces.
Take a look at this site: http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm I haven't had the time to verify the numbers (Pacific theatre was not my major) but they do overall jive with what I know, and I've seen the two authors that are quoted in more scholarly works, so I take what is presented here at face value.
The Japanese were quite headstrong, but by the time they were losing Iwo Jima, they knew that there was only really one end; their loss. You can see it in their strategic and tactical responses. One-way fleet sorties, utterly defense-oriented combat operations. Add to that the fact that their own cities were being bombed and burnt to the ground, even the people themselves were beginning to bend and crack.
Except the Japanese were putting out some negotiations via the russians to try to negotiate a peace settlement by early '44. By that point they had recognized that should everything continue, they were going to lose. Their negotiations were meant to save face at home by presenting a story about how they "hadn't really been totally defeated".
The main sticking point was that they wanted to keep their current political structure, emperor and all. The main allies (The US especially) wanted an unconditional surrender. Hence the war continuing onwards.
Just because you're looking to surrender dosen't make you a spineless weenie. There is such a thing as recognizing when you're completely overmatched and needing to cut a deal...
However, IF Steam goes under, the first things that will be monetized by them will be physical property. Computers, office equipment, property and land. Afterwards intellectual property will be monetized, assuming that debts remain.
However, as was stated earlier, Valve does not have overly large amounts of debt....
There was also the fact that Japan's surrender offers came with a single solid caveat for them: They insisted that the Emperor not be charged and remain in place. US thought at the time was that this would give them a core excuse as to why they lost (The spineless generals backstabbed the emperor) and also to a degree smacked of the non-democratic ideals that were being tossed around at the time. Lastly, they had rather publically agreed to unconditional surrender. Cutting a deal and keeping the emperor in place makes it somewhat conditional.
In the end they did get to keep the emperor, but it wasn't a garuntee as part of the surrender.
Well, one thing that CCP (the guys making EVE) have been ever-so-slowly grinding towards is a good and proper war. No, not an alliance vs. alliance or corporation vs. corporation, but actual in-game Government vs. Government warfare. Of course, this is something that's been promised for over a year, but it will eventually come.
As far as social upheaval, give CCP enough time... We may yet see that and more...
There are substantial upheavals that occur in the EVE universe, when (as in WOW) new technologies and items are introduced. Older technology bombs out in price, new hardware sells like hotcakes and for a whole set of limbs. As well, as new methods are introduced to manufacture items, prices also substantially adjust as well.
The best example of the latter was the introduction of Invention. Previously, Tech 2 items were only available at exorbitant prices due to A) the rarity of blueprints used to produce them and B) the high demand. The blueprints were given out in a weird lottery system that would take too long to accurately explain, but suffice to say that some blueprints were literally money machines. Invention allowed players, with some reusable hardware and some resources, create tech 2 blueprint copies (blueprints with limited amounts of use). The needed resources are all available relatively easily, so a large number of additional sources of the blueprints entered the market, thus introducing more supply of certain items, leading prices of said items to drop out. While the hardware needed for Invention was also hard to come by, it was several orders of magnitude easier to obtain than a Tech 2 blueprint.
Additionally, while there are no major factional barriers as in WOW, there is the matter of distance. Hauling resources across the EVE universe can take a substantial amount of time, sometimes days in real time.
Lastly, the use of EVE as a market study exists precisely due to its size. Smaller markets are more vulnerable to sudden changes due to a few market changes. As you pointed out, in some WOW servers a few people effectively make the economy. What happens to your model when they leave? You get to see something like Germany in the 1930's. Economic meltdown (though somewhat different in actual mechanics). You'd get the same rough effect if suddenly Saudi Arabia discovered it couldn't sell oil. For ten years. The entire market takes a major crap. EVE's market is multi-leveled and is not reliant on any one industry, person, or activity.
All in all, I suspect the quarterly report at the end of October will be far more interesting, as it will delve into more usable macroeconomic markers.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, you do have a timed learning system, but you crucially forget that the time scales logarithmically but the bonuses are linear. You can spend a quarter the time skilling and achieve over 90% of the same performance as someone who's skilled for years. That last 10% can easily be made up by skill, some planning, or a friend.
The second thing is the obsession with T2 ships being OMGPWNZRS. You can credibly fight with a basic T1 frigate or cruiser for much lower cost and time investment. Hell, you can even make it a profitable proposition with some planning. Lost your ship? No matter, the insurance payout is more than the cost to buy and fit it! Can't do that with T2 in the least. T2 ships are specialized beasts. They do one thing and do it well, but at a penalty at doing anything else, and at a much, MUCH higher cost. You know what the most popular frigate is to go out and kick ass? It's the Rifter, a basic T1 frigate that you can be flying in less than three hours. With bad attributes.
Thirdly, guess what, there is only a fininte amount of skills that can help with anything. Myself, I have almost 70m skillpoints. Ooh I should be a combat monster. But I'm not. Most of it is industrial skills for manufacturing. Want to fly and make others die? You can have a character that can whomp me in less than six months by yourself. Fly with a friend and you can be in that same postion in perhaps a month.
But hey, what do I know about this anyways? I'm just a manufacturer....
Seconded on that. I buy hardcover Sci-Fi novels (certianly not mainstream like a Dan Brown novel), and regular price on them is around 38-40 CDN. And yet somehow, I can get a good fraction off that book if I have a club card. If I order it ONLINE (something that strips out the regular brick and mortar costs of sales and distribution) I can regularily save 40% or more from that price. And somehow the publishers and major bookstores aren't going out of business as a result. And just to really drive a nail in this coffin, one can always go to Baen's and see how they run a publishing house that somehow dosen't manage to implode...
Given that the ME1 exploration system was grappling with the Mako and getting to some of the deposits was a cast-iron nightmare and EASILY took longer than five minutes, I think the scanning mechanic is far better. Unless you enjoyed driving over jagged terrain that made your rattle like a can in a paint mixer...
Like paperwork and administration, a weapon as you see it is always a dead loss. Until something unexpected happens and you need proof, or in the case of the military, defence. You don't do it or support it all the time because it ALWAYS provides a benefit; you support/do it all the time because when something goes pear shaped out of your control, you have something that can deal with it/cover your ass.
While the ship models in EVE are static (though gun turrets aboard do rotate), the effects they have to generate are considerably more intensive. Just about any activity you do in your ship will have some external visible effect. Repairing armor or shields will result in a visual animation over your hull or shields. Each gun that fires means a single effect just for that. Any remote support, ditto. A logistics ship can be remotely repairing 4-5 ships at once, with a visible effect for each seperate repair signal.
http://www.youtube.com/user/CCPGAMES#p/c/10838E1219A2EC16/5/JNFh1rgJ958
That's a link to one of the tournament fights that CCP put on between player groups. The client HAS been modified, but only to show the health of 20 ships at a time, broken into teams, and to remove the commentator's own ship UI. Other than that, it's legit. That's a small 10v10 battle.
EVE can handle over one thousand players in a single system/"zone". Places like Jita (THE trade hub of EVE) regularily pass 1300 concurrent active users at one time. In one star system. Admittedly though the vast majority of Jita players are "passing through" or conducting trade and not shooting each other in the face. Star systems out in the areas of space where players create their own empires can have fleet battles that push past 400 people per side, though admittedly there are occurences of heavy lag. In the past (IE one year ago or more) this would be instead extreme lag to the point of killing the node. In the last year however they have implemented heavy server and database optimizations that are pushing the boundary of stable large group combat higher and higher. I wish I could have better references, but I know several battles have been fought that were past 300v300 and were done with a minimum of lag (the reason I remember this is because of the comments wondering WHERE the lag was). CCP devs have also stated that they've just begun major DB optimization and they expect greater improvements to come. Of course, that's them selling their product, but they do recognize it is a major issue, and they ARE working towards correcting it. To turn the question on its head, how many people can a single WOW server handle, in one instance, in one specific zone? All PVPing against each other or providing remote support in one manner or another? Personally I'd be suprised if that number was any higher than what EVE is currently capable of.
To a degree, up here in Canada (lower mainland of Vancouver) the police already monitor power consumption of homes and apartments for marijuana grow ops. One thing that people don't notice/realize is that a grow op actually has a rather specific power signature. Homes with grow-ops are typically yearly rental/lease agreement homes. The growers themselves do not live at the property. The end result is a static high power draw that keeps the lights and hydropondics gear running 24/7. This is VERY different from even the most excessive of home power uses. Unless you're running a commericaial dishwashing/laundry/whatever out of your home that operates 24/7 you're going to have a VERY different bit of power consumption. Add on to the fact that it's not the only actual investigation technique. Grow Ops are typcailly seldom attended all the time, so some basic surveillance would reveal the difference between you being a power hog and you growing a crop in your basement.
Yes, why not?
Because pulling percentage growth numbers out of thin air is PHB at its finest. Set the bar at an unrealistic level and you won't get any motivation or progress. Goals have to be at least somewhat realistic and attainable in some manner for them to be actually useful. Otherwise you get something out of a dilbert cartoon.
I'm not even asking for the improvements to pay off — this is separate from an actual output increase. I just want an appreciable increase — regardless of whether it has (yet) paid for the software — before I get excited.
Fair enough on that. :) With this however, only time will really tell however.
But would you expect ANY sort of technological improvement like this to boost output by 50%? Such infrastructure improvements can take years to properly pay off dividends, so we may be waiting for some time before we get real results. That of course will be attributed to other inputs (either because cause/effect cannot be determined, or because it serves a political master better to have something else as the cause).
This is oddly one of the main things that's driven into my Business Admin degree. In virtually every course we encounter where we have standardized math equations (mainly seen when doing mortgage and other time-value money work) we are introduced to the concepts and we do some questions on paper, and then we're shown how to use our calculator (a basic BA-II+ by TI incidentally) to do the same math. In many cases it's not the student's implementation of their solution that is a problem but instead their math. A simple error in copying a number or some other mundane "oops" that results in them failing a question. We're taught and trained to understand HOW the calculator does the dirty work so we can recognize when we get an odd answer (the calculator isn't our god after all, just a tool) but we use it to do a LOT of dirty work that vastly speeds up our time. For example, this was a question we had in 3rd year finance. It's not the ONLY question in the exam, I should add. Certainly not the hardest. Anyhow, a pizzeria has the option to buy a new oven or keep the current one. We have to take ALL the cash flows for the next 5 years on both options, bring them back to the present, as well as disposal costs and returns, amortizations, tax shields and more. With a non-linear cash flow to boot. Want to bet how many people did that stuff by hand? Yeah. Not many.
Oddly enough, that's exactly how I loaded some chairs into my friend's truck when we were moving house this week...
Though one could also point out that as an officer of parliament, they -are- a part of the Government of Canada...
Does anyone know if WotC has done a big buyback? It almost seems like someone has been scouring the bookstores methodically, snatching up everything that would suggest an older edition ever existed.
I can't speak for other places, but I ended up talking with several local game store owners in my neck of the woods. From what I've been able to piece together, a fairly self-reinforcing cycle kicked in about the same time they announced 4e:
1) 4e announced, fanbase is split as some embrace the expansion, others see possible writing on wall and begin buying 3.5e stuff where they can. Some hobby stores begin discounting 3.5e in order to clear out "old inventory".
2) As more people begin to grab 3.5 stuff, sales in local stores of said increase, outpacing 4e sales noticeably. Stores put in restock orders to local distributors. Lower margin per item is compensated by higher volume sales, so local stores wish to keep items in stock as much as possible.
3) WoTC notices that 3.5 demand is higher than 4e. They then conduct a buyback at the distributor level (this is what happened in my neghborhood. WoTC bought back, at almost retail IIRC, all of their own 3.5e product). Distributors inform local stores that they have no more WoTC stock in inventory and will not be receiving more.
4) Locals discover 3.5 isn't getting restocked, many core books are cleaned out and several secondary markets are also cleaned.
End result: 3.5e stuff is virtually gone except for several niche stores that only stocked it as a secondary product (I've found myself hitting Chapters stores, Goth clothing and miscellaneous stores, and other out of the way locations to pick up various 3.5 stuff).
That doing anything by yourself in EVE is going to be boring, unless you're somewhat antisocial (which is suprising... would've thought Zero was right in the middle of that category). In a lot of ways it's like playing Clue with only one other person. You can do it, but you lose so much of the game that you ought to wonder why...
This, a guy who ended up playing a massive multiplayer game by himself. Might as well have tested Quake by not shooting...
I don't think the Japanese were completely over matched. Especially at the beginning of the war. A lot of the reason the US did as well as it did was due to nothing more than luck. Certainly not all allied victories were, but there were some very decisive battles that were mostly luck. I don't think the US wanted to have to deal with such a industrious and determined enemy again in the foreseeable future. I certainly agree that surrender on Japans terms would keep them from looking like "spineless weenies". However not allowing Japan to do so, was much more disgraceful to such an admirable people and was a way to avoid allowing them to dress their wounds and try again.
Actually, the Japanese were completely outmatched. Yamamoto stated that he could "run wild for one year, eighteen months at most" but after that, he would not be able to garuntee anything. Just comparing industrial output, the disparity was sickening. By 1944, the US had 41.7% of TOTAL military output, worldwide. The US army and navy did as well as it did by weight of their numbers and the tenacity of forces.
Take a look at this site: http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm I haven't had the time to verify the numbers (Pacific theatre was not my major) but they do overall jive with what I know, and I've seen the two authors that are quoted in more scholarly works, so I take what is presented here at face value.
The Japanese were quite headstrong, but by the time they were losing Iwo Jima, they knew that there was only really one end; their loss. You can see it in their strategic and tactical responses. One-way fleet sorties, utterly defense-oriented combat operations. Add to that the fact that their own cities were being bombed and burnt to the ground, even the people themselves were beginning to bend and crack.
Except the Japanese were putting out some negotiations via the russians to try to negotiate a peace settlement by early '44. By that point they had recognized that should everything continue, they were going to lose. Their negotiations were meant to save face at home by presenting a story about how they "hadn't really been totally defeated". The main sticking point was that they wanted to keep their current political structure, emperor and all. The main allies (The US especially) wanted an unconditional surrender. Hence the war continuing onwards. Just because you're looking to surrender dosen't make you a spineless weenie. There is such a thing as recognizing when you're completely overmatched and needing to cut a deal...
However, IF Steam goes under, the first things that will be monetized by them will be physical property. Computers, office equipment, property and land. Afterwards intellectual property will be monetized, assuming that debts remain. However, as was stated earlier, Valve does not have overly large amounts of debt....
There was also the fact that Japan's surrender offers came with a single solid caveat for them: They insisted that the Emperor not be charged and remain in place. US thought at the time was that this would give them a core excuse as to why they lost (The spineless generals backstabbed the emperor) and also to a degree smacked of the non-democratic ideals that were being tossed around at the time. Lastly, they had rather publically agreed to unconditional surrender. Cutting a deal and keeping the emperor in place makes it somewhat conditional. In the end they did get to keep the emperor, but it wasn't a garuntee as part of the surrender.
Well, one thing that CCP (the guys making EVE) have been ever-so-slowly grinding towards is a good and proper war. No, not an alliance vs. alliance or corporation vs. corporation, but actual in-game Government vs. Government warfare. Of course, this is something that's been promised for over a year, but it will eventually come. As far as social upheaval, give CCP enough time... We may yet see that and more...
There are substantial upheavals that occur in the EVE universe, when (as in WOW) new technologies and items are introduced. Older technology bombs out in price, new hardware sells like hotcakes and for a whole set of limbs. As well, as new methods are introduced to manufacture items, prices also substantially adjust as well.
The best example of the latter was the introduction of Invention. Previously, Tech 2 items were only available at exorbitant prices due to A) the rarity of blueprints used to produce them and B) the high demand. The blueprints were given out in a weird lottery system that would take too long to accurately explain, but suffice to say that some blueprints were literally money machines. Invention allowed players, with some reusable hardware and some resources, create tech 2 blueprint copies (blueprints with limited amounts of use). The needed resources are all available relatively easily, so a large number of additional sources of the blueprints entered the market, thus introducing more supply of certain items, leading prices of said items to drop out. While the hardware needed for Invention was also hard to come by, it was several orders of magnitude easier to obtain than a Tech 2 blueprint.
Additionally, while there are no major factional barriers as in WOW, there is the matter of distance. Hauling resources across the EVE universe can take a substantial amount of time, sometimes days in real time.
Lastly, the use of EVE as a market study exists precisely due to its size. Smaller markets are more vulnerable to sudden changes due to a few market changes. As you pointed out, in some WOW servers a few people effectively make the economy. What happens to your model when they leave? You get to see something like Germany in the 1930's. Economic meltdown (though somewhat different in actual mechanics). You'd get the same rough effect if suddenly Saudi Arabia discovered it couldn't sell oil. For ten years. The entire market takes a major crap. EVE's market is multi-leveled and is not reliant on any one industry, person, or activity.
All in all, I suspect the quarterly report at the end of October will be far more interesting, as it will delve into more usable macroeconomic markers.