Maybe not the initial cost, but who pays for maintenance and repairs? And maintenance and repairs ten years from now? And replacements, when they start breaking in a few months?
On one hand, I specifically said that he did not have my permission to enter my house, on the other, since he knocked on my door, he'd get a meal out of me.
Make the meal (or order a pizza if you're not allowed to leave) and bring it to him on the porch?
But was it really forbidden to critizise the ruling class in A Brave New World? Wasn't it just that no-one did, because constant fun-and-sport-and-sexytimes made every-one both content and shallow as puddles. (Except the protagonist.) I think you want 1984.
Of course not. The criteria should be "are enough people prepared to pay for you doing it, without them being coerced to?". But then again, I am from another planet.
That's true, now that you mention it; you have to press tab also to get the program name. And possibly cycle through several if there is more than one match.
The larger layout also creates much longer distances and reduces the information density so much that scanning available options takes significantly longer than with the more compact representation of the start menu.)
Which is also true for the ribbon UI. Man, I can't wait until Microsoft reinvents the menu.
...hit the windows key and just type in the first few letters to the program I want and hit enter.
I am never sure about comments like these. Actual Windows user who actually thinks so (or MS shrill who gets paid to think so), or UNIX/Linux nerd who is deeply ironic.
Because UNIX-like OS'es has had that since, oh, the 1990's at least. It's how their so called "command line interface" works. Which was widely hated as a very newbie-unfriendly UI. But put gradients on it and suddenly the users love it. Apparently.
I'm more concerned that he seems to have problems separating fantasy and reality. What proportion of murderers are (were) members of the NRA, compared to the general public, by the way? Should the USAians ban the NRA or make membership mandatory to prevent murdering?
Slashdot Mirror
How do you put a nail in somewhere the hammer doesn't fit?
Now we just have to beat Qualcomm's campaign contributions so that this will be made into law.
So we need to install this in prisons' solitary confinement. Then, after the novelty wears off, we'll finally know.
And a knife? Why a knife?
Come to think of it, it has been some time now since there was an article on how large a portion of windows users who are still on XP.
Maybe not the initial cost, but who pays for maintenance and repairs? And maintenance and repairs ten years from now? And replacements, when they start breaking in a few months?
On one hand, I specifically said that he did not have my permission to enter my house, on the other, since he knocked on my door, he'd get a meal out of me.
Make the meal (or order a pizza if you're not allowed to leave) and bring it to him on the porch?
But how can you be sure that you have nothing to hide?
Uhu, but did your program have a configuration file, you lamer?
I take it Google and NASA are preparing offers for this guy as we speak. (Or Facebook. He obviously knows how to work the networks social.)
...ban an entire industry...
That industry better make with the campaign contributions, then.
Liberty and the pursuit of happiness, dude. That's it. It's right there in the constitution. There is no right to life if you're an American citizen.
But was it really forbidden to critizise the ruling class in A Brave New World? Wasn't it just that no-one did, because constant fun-and-sport-and-sexytimes made every-one both content and shallow as puddles. (Except the protagonist.) I think you want 1984.
Interesting. Maybe I need to nuance my view of the language department.
So, we need the humanities department because that's the only way to learn foreign languages.
Of course not. The criteria should be "are enough people prepared to pay for you doing it, without them being coerced to?". But then again, I am from another planet.
We ought to outlaw selfishness. Everyone should always work towards the common good.
That's true, now that you mention it; you have to press tab also to get the program name. And possibly cycle through several if there is more than one match.
Based on certain real world experiences
Like what?
If only there was some way to change a bad president, or a unresponsible congress, if The People felt that they didn't do their jobs the right way
They shouldn't be changes at all, they should be options. (But then no-one would use the new designs, and we can't have that, can we...)
The larger layout also creates much longer distances and reduces the information density so much that scanning available options takes significantly longer than with the more compact representation of the start menu.)
Which is also true for the ribbon UI. Man, I can't wait until Microsoft reinvents the menu.
...hit the windows key and just type in the first few letters to the program I want and hit enter.
I am never sure about comments like these. Actual Windows user who actually thinks so (or MS shrill who gets paid to think so), or UNIX/Linux nerd who is deeply ironic.
Because UNIX-like OS'es has had that since, oh, the 1990's at least. It's how their so called "command line interface" works. Which was widely hated as a very newbie-unfriendly UI. But put gradients on it and suddenly the users love it. Apparently.
...in modern world - husband might be officially considered as the family's head...
Where in the modern world do you live?
Why only man-shaped targets?! Do you need more equalism training?
Sheesh. I suppose next you're going to tell us that you only shoot at white targets, or only black targets...
I'm more concerned that he seems to have problems separating fantasy and reality. What proportion of murderers are (were) members of the NRA, compared to the general public, by the way? Should the USAians ban the NRA or make membership mandatory to prevent murdering?