"Would it have been better to debate their ideas or even just ignore them?" I ask him. "Now they can claim they were 'suppressed' and their free speech was infringed."
"No," Zok insists. "With this persons we can't debate or ignored. We can't because it's not acceptable."
So, as long as someone agrees with you, you are allowed free speech. This seems strangely familiar to me....
Not true at all. All that has to happen is have a supporting library change and the code doesn't work. Two examples:
I am looking into a problem we have here where my software works fine with GD 2.0.23. If I upgrade GD to 2.0.28 (compiling from source, not using binaries) my code stops working. Everything compiles fine. Everything links fine. Just doesn't work.
Look at the FOX toolkit. The interface completely changed from 1.X to 2.X. No backwards compatibility. I need to re-write all of my source to handle the new interface.
two of the only House seats that Republicans managed to hold on to
Wow is this wrong. I suspect the author meant the only two contested seats that Republicans held on to. The House is completely re-elected every two years. If this statement was true, then only two Republicans would have house seats!!
You have a right to watch some one else's copyrighted material online? On a third party provider? Your definition of right is much different than mine. I have a desire, but not a right.
but the sad fact of the matter is that compared to you, most people are pretty dumb (look at how many people vote Republican;-)
Someday I look forward to a day when not everything you read has to be political. Forget about which side is being picked on here, it is an article about geek myths! Why the Republican bash?
Oh yea,/. requires all articles to have a bach against Republicans or (even better) George Bush.
Slashdot Mirror
So, as long as someone agrees with you, you are allowed free speech. This seems strangely familiar to me....
(Flame shield on!)
I just want to know where are the /. hordes screaming for Democrats heads. It was a daily thing just a few months ago....
And if the rest of the world jumped in the ocean....
I fail to see the logic that just because everyone else does something, I need to do something...
Assuming someone will notice, try a will. Filled with the state, it will be executed upon your death.
I am looking into a problem we have here where my software works fine with GD 2.0.23. If I upgrade GD to 2.0.28 (compiling from source, not using binaries) my code stops working. Everything compiles fine. Everything links fine. Just doesn't work.
Look at the FOX toolkit. The interface completely changed from 1.X to 2.X. No backwards compatibility. I need to re-write all of my source to handle the new interface.
Wow is this wrong. I suspect the author meant the only two contested seats that Republicans held on to. The House is completely re-elected every two years. If this statement was true, then only two Republicans would have house seats!!
You have a right to watch some one else's copyrighted material online? On a third party provider? Your definition of right is much different than mine. I have a desire, but not a right.
controversial: obviously
unconstitutional: Not until the courts rule it. If it is the appeal process it is NOT unconstitutional!!!
Someday I look forward to a day when not everything you read has to be political. Forget about which side is being picked on here, it is an article about geek myths! Why the Republican bash?
Oh yea, /. requires all articles to have a bach against Republicans or (even better) George Bush.