except if this law passed it would come into effect after many people decided to be a teacher.
and also what if there were a law that stripped the constitutional rights of anyone who attended protests against the government. i mean they choose to attend the protest right?
remember that flash game a while back that someone made that could only be played once? there was definitely nothing profit driven about that being that it cost nothing to play.
i dunno there's a lot about old school games that just cannot be done any more thanks to save games (well a lot more to do with short attention spans). I remember playing games on my master system/mega drive for hours on end to finish (or not in the case that i ran out of lives,. yeah dying in a game used to mean something) it was a good thing that I couldn't save them.
nowadays, with most games, oops i made a mistake, i'll just load to five minutes ago. and adventure games. before the Internet meant that if you couldn't figure out what to do within 5 minutes you'd just look it up. sometimes taking away freedoms is a good thing. as long as you agree not to have those freedoms in this setting.
that being said it is quite likely that their motivation behind this may be to curb second hand games. but well, i'll make my decision on weather i want to play it based on what it is.
"Possibly because the intersection of the set of "People who use an iPad " and "People who understand what a User-Agent String is" is pretty much a null set."
Now I have to hit delete on an url and type whatever I want or click new tab and then type it.
Really? cause on my computer when text is highlighted and i start typing it automatically deletes the highlighted text and replaces it with what i type.
also, when you click into the url bar it auto highlights the whole url.
He was replying to the post titled "Identify her, everywhere." not Moryath (553296)'s Reply.
The poster he was criticizing said that she should be identified everywhere solely because this gag order exists, despite completely understanding that identifying her is wrong and if there was no gag order then he would completely support their wish for privacy.
I'm fairly certain that they couldn't play GT5 before OtherOS was removed, you know being that game wasn't even available at the time.
That being said it was known well before the release of the ps3 that GT5 would be playable eventually on the ps3 however there was never a guarantee from sony regarding this.
No it's not, Telstra retail is required to pay the same costs to Telstra wholesale. that cost is about $50 when its a matter of placing codes on the line.
Yes Telstra wholesale/retail are separate and operational separation is heavily regulated by the ACCC, it really is a case of lazy hack ISPs
If you are in that situation, talk to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman. I know someone who was in that situation where TPG said they couldn't give them ADSL but BigPond said they could. They talked to the TIO and ended up on the TPG plan they wanted without needing to pay anything to Telstra (i.e. contract exit fees).
I cant find a cite but thanks to the ACCC, Telstra are legally required to wholesale ADSL1 to any ISP that wants to buy a port from Telstra Wholesale.
Telstra is not favouring its retail business units by implicitly supplying services to itself at prices which are unjustifiably lower or of a higher quality than those offered to downstream competitors.
Although in situations like this it isn't Telstra's fault, they aren't denying other ISP's access, Telstra wholesale and Telstra retail are completely separated. Telstra retail have no better access to infrastructure and the TIO should refer you to the provider you are trying to connect with.
Telstra wholesale don't speak to or deal with customers only to other providers, and Telstra retail cannot help you connect with another provider.
Slashdot Mirror
except if this law passed it would come into effect after many people decided to be a teacher.
and also what if there were a law that stripped the constitutional rights of anyone who attended protests against the government. i mean they choose to attend the protest right?
Although it does say establish a site, not an account on one.
which means it'll likely be decided the first time it gets argued in court.
remember that flash game a while back that someone made that could only be played once? there was definitely nothing profit driven about that being that it cost nothing to play.
i dunno there's a lot about old school games that just cannot be done any more thanks to save games (well a lot more to do with short attention spans). I remember playing games on my master system/mega drive for hours on end to finish (or not in the case that i ran out of lives,. yeah dying in a game used to mean something) it was a good thing that I couldn't save them.
nowadays, with most games, oops i made a mistake, i'll just load to five minutes ago. and adventure games. before the Internet meant that if you couldn't figure out what to do within 5 minutes you'd just look it up. sometimes taking away freedoms is a good thing. as long as you agree not to have those freedoms in this setting.
that being said it is quite likely that their motivation behind this may be to curb second hand games. but well, i'll make my decision on weather i want to play it based on what it is.
three times i read your first sentence and was wondering why being fired would cause you to get laid.
And? Are you saying these companies don't have that info? Please...
Yes they do, as does everyone, i'll tell you know, the minmum speed for all of them is 0.
GP was correct in that the speed you actually recieve will be anywhere between there and their maximum speed depending on your device and coverage.
great for earthquakes
That would depend on the crime(s).
in this case - possibly yes. but i'll hold judgement on that until i see what he is charged with that there is any decent evidence for.
Where i live it's Wednesday now.
for someone who's a complete stranger to you, you sure have a lot of faith in him.
Yeah but not living in America would protect you from the FBI.
There's a whole big world outside of the US, and hackers exist there too.
he could be basing this opinion on their actions not their skills.
And:
"Possibly because the intersection of the set of "People who use an iPad " and "People who understand what a User-Agent String is" is pretty much a null set."
Would have more accurately conveyed yours.
He means 0.001% over the legal limit (so in your case at 0.051%)
i'm pretty sure the limit in the U.S. is higher than ours (depending on state)
dammnit, i only got this thing connected cause i heard it was full of porn
the amount of effor involved in dropping support for something is somewhere in the negative region.
1980 just called and they want their lame joke back.
Yes - Exactly: the rights of everyone is more important than the lives of a few.
This is why people voluntarily join armies and go fight wars.
So we should ban people that don't use bookmarks from using the internet?
Now I have to hit delete on an url and type whatever I want or click new tab and then type it.
Really? cause on my computer when text is highlighted and i start typing it automatically deletes the highlighted text and replaces it with what i type.
also, when you click into the url bar it auto highlights the whole url.
He was replying to the post titled "Identify her, everywhere." not Moryath (553296)'s Reply.
The poster he was criticizing said that she should be identified everywhere solely because this gag order exists, despite completely understanding that identifying her is wrong and if there was no gag order then he would completely support their wish for privacy.
cause if Canada didn't do this then they'd just go,
"Gee we're making so much money that i'm beginning to grow bored. Lets reduce our profits by cutting price!"
personal(thought), private speech, public speech, broadcast & publication are different things.
the amount of people listening is relevant in that it influences how much effect what is being said will have.
I'm fairly certain that they couldn't play GT5 before OtherOS was removed, you know being that game wasn't even available at the time.
That being said it was known well before the release of the ps3 that GT5 would be playable eventually on the ps3 however there was never a guarantee from sony regarding this.
No it's not, Telstra retail is required to pay the same costs to Telstra wholesale. that cost is about $50 when its a matter of placing codes on the line. Yes Telstra wholesale/retail are separate and operational separation is heavily regulated by the ACCC, it really is a case of lazy hack ISPs
If you are in that situation, talk to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman. I know someone who was in that situation where TPG said they couldn't give them ADSL but BigPond said they could. They talked to the TIO and ended up on the TPG plan they wanted without needing to pay anything to Telstra (i.e. contract exit fees).
I cant find a cite but thanks to the ACCC, Telstra are legally required to wholesale ADSL1 to any ISP that wants to buy a port from Telstra Wholesale.
http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/759631
Telstra is not favouring its retail business units by implicitly supplying services to itself at prices which are unjustifiably lower or of a higher quality than those offered to downstream competitors.
Although in situations like this it isn't Telstra's fault, they aren't denying other ISP's access, Telstra wholesale and Telstra retail are completely separated. Telstra retail have no better access to infrastructure and the TIO should refer you to the provider you are trying to connect with.
Telstra wholesale don't speak to or deal with customers only to other providers, and Telstra retail cannot help you connect with another provider.