Personal responsibility is a pure fiction in a deterministic universe. Everything that will ever happen was decided at the time of the Big Bang. We just don't have the instruments to predict everything yet.
Let's say you have code for a compiler (Code A), and a couple of compilers you want to test (compilers B, C, D, and E).
So we run code A through compilers B,C,D, and E. The executables (B_A, C_A, D_A and E_A) from them will obviously be different, but they should all function identically.
So we run code A through compilers B_A, C_A, D_A and E_A. If the resulting output executable is the same from all compilers, then we sure that all the compilers are either evil in exactly the same manner or all good.
The article vastly overstates the danger. It's fairly trivial to tell if a compiler is evil, so long as not all compilers are evil in exactly the same way.
It's not as if the shortfall could have been caused by some sort of massive economic downturn souring their endowment's investments. I think I would have heard of that.
Slashdot Mirror
So, a domain name squatter, eh?
Figures.
Nah, turns out "she" was just a regex.
Maybe they should switch to a ten iron instead. That should work.
Come one, everyone knows meteor swarm is reflex (half).
The president does have a magic wand - the unbeatable combo of control of the armed services and the presidential pardon.
Unfortunately, it's rather a bad idea.
Personal responsibility is a pure fiction in a deterministic universe.
Everything that will ever happen was decided at the time of the Big Bang.
We just don't have the instruments to predict everything yet.
So why are you posting that comment?
Haven't you heard of a control group?
Phomon phonon!
Doo doo-doo doo doo!
Let's say you have code for a compiler (Code A), and a couple of compilers you want to test (compilers B, C, D, and E).
So we run code A through compilers B,C,D, and E. The executables (B_A, C_A, D_A and E_A) from them will obviously be different, but they should all function identically.
So we run code A through compilers B_A, C_A, D_A and E_A. If the resulting output executable is the same from all compilers, then we sure that all the compilers are either evil in exactly the same manner or all good.
The article vastly overstates the danger. It's fairly trivial to tell if a compiler is evil, so long as not all compilers are evil in exactly the same way.
One pint of water is one pound. Eight pints in a gallon.
Done.
He's William freakin' Shakespeare. He doesn't need to plagiarize anyone else.
Of course, if you've had chicken pox normally, then the viruses are still chilling in your nerve cells, and you're at risk for shingles anyway.
The vaccine is better at preventing shingles, since the virus typically doesn't end up in your nerves.
It's not as if the shortfall could have been caused by some sort of massive economic downturn souring their endowment's investments. I think I would have heard of that.
Unless you're Thrawn, I doubt an art history degree is going to be useful.
Then why does Apple's software have such bad user interfaces?
Nah, Galileo faced persecution because he was being a dick.
And his astronomical ideas were a bit of a crapshoot (see his thoughts on comets).
But the singularity might accidentally the world.
The universe is not deterministic. If you got stuck in a loop like that, eventually you'd break out due to some crazy quantum coincidence.
Well, sure, if you want to do it the easy way.
They're a reason they called Chemical Ali Chemical Ali.
I can tell by the pixels, and from having seen quite a few shops in my time.
Neurosky's brain computer interface hardware/software would work much more effectively for this.
Plus, it's (eventually) coming to Wiiware, with quadruple the graphics resolution.
(enhanced graphics/music is toggleable)
Really?
I thought they got aroused by banning things.