Atomic Force Microscopes start in the range of $10,000, you could easily build one in your own basement. Electron Microscopes are more expensive, but still very common at labs doing this type of thing. Depending on what types of bonds are being formed, there's all types of spectroscopy that could be done. Really, verifying the results is just basic chemistry.
That's one way of looking at it. Another way is that the total population of the world changed by at least a factor of 10 between the Crusades the the Soviet Union, so expressed as a percentage, they're about equal.
Yet another way of the looking at it is that both are equally bad, but atheists are just more efficient.
Interesting example because at least some of the Allies (the Soviet Union) were clearly not good guys in any sense and committed atrocities that were equal to or greater than those committed by the "bad guys".
The drugs are being sold by "patients" or used recreationally. Prescription drug abuse is the prevalent type of drug use. This is easy money for the poor kids.
While I agree with you're basic premise of opening up the data, I think your view of the statistics is a bit limited. Anyone can draw a trend line and calculate error bars, but when multiple data sets have conflicting data, it requires to a great deal of understanding of experimental methods, theoretical models, etc. to determine which datasets are most relevant to make what kind of conclusions. The "tricks" come from matching up tree ring data, ice core data, satellite data, direct measurements and many others. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses these methods is where an expert is needed and why your undergraduate math major is less than useful.
And what if the failure rate is comparable to the Space Shuttle ~2%. How many people are going to pay for a 90 minutes, $10,000 that has a 1/50 chance of killing you?
nuclear rockets aren't clean enough to use on a populated planet.
Why does this keep getting repeated? An Orion-type launch would require less than 1000 nuclear devices of about.15 kT yield each. Considering that the US and Soviet Union test thousands of devices with much high yields with minimal environmental impact, using nuclear rockets aren't the doomsday scenario that people think.
But that's necessary even if you defend only property rights. Even a libertarian government would still have police to defend the property rights and courts to settle disputes which mean they would have to tax which means they would have to take money by threat of violence and imprisonment. You're not avoiding the dilemma, you're just prioritizing the "rights" that are important to you over the rights that are important to people less fortunate than you.
Comparing "red state" to "blue states" is ridiculous. Apples have more in common with oranges than Utah has in common with New York. Cherry picking (uncited) stats proves nothing.
Even within a states, comparisons are dubious: Austin, TX, is one of the safest cities in the country, but Dallas and Houston are among the most dangerous. How does your red/blue ideology account for that?
Don't be such a jerk. There are plenty of reasons to be sceptical about the utility of such a system. The history of technology development has plenty of "clever" ideas that were ultimately dead ends (eg Cue Cat). "Find that killer app" is very difficult step. Your example didn't convince me since none of those activities (reading, email, teleconference) can't already be done as good or better with a laptop or handheld computer.
Considering its a health insurance bill and not a car insurance bill or a life insurance bill, then no it doesn't and it shouldn't address your unrelated concerns.
Transmetroplitan is a direct riff on Hunter S Thompson.
The Sandman struck me as being extremely derivative of the a lot "New Wave" fantasy from the '70s. Stuff like Roger Zelazny, Philip José Farmer, Michael Moorcock, Ursula K. Le Guin.
I've read all those. They're good comics, but they're not good enough to elevate the whole genre. Transmetropolitan and Sandman are basically rip-offs (or homages to be nice) of previous works, they don't even stand on their own. Watchmen works best as a deconstruction of superhero comics and if you don't care about the genre in the first place, it has nothing to offer.
Sorry you went to Stereotype High School, but the top 5 people in my graduating class (myself included) were all in varsity sports and have all now gone on to have careers in advanced science. Practically all the scientists I know participate in some sports. We play on softball teams or run marathons or rock climb,etc. There are very few top scientists who are fat, slobby nerds.
And the fact that you don't think there's any strategy in sports just demonstrates your own ignorance. I don't know where to even start with that.
That means you can't just make up magical anti-Darwinian species that doesn't try to fill every available evolutionary niche because they have mysteriously got a gene to tell them to stay home.
Honestly, that basically describes humans. Sure there is a small fraction that want to explore and colonize the universe and an even tinier fraction who is willing to put forward the effort to try to achieve those goals. But you'll find that the vast, vast majority of people of this planet don't care and are more than to stay on the planet.
Most people never even move a few miles from the place they were born. The explorers in our species are the exceptions.
Jeez dude, I just gave one example of a plausible situation where tax revenue would need to benon-linear with population. An even more likely one is that since Arizona is a growing state they need to plan with that growth in mind. Roads, police stations and schools aren't instantly built like in SimCity. So they have to spend money as if the population is larger than is it currently is because it will soon catch up.
I could come up with dozens of reasonable scenarios to account for the trivial 1.2% discrepancy.
And then you reply with crazy tax theories. How is that relevant? Do you think the state of Arizona has any constitutional authority to tax IP?
If anything, the increase in population should yield a net increase in revenues, so that you wouldn't have to raise the rates.
Again, using your own link: 42% of Arizona's budget is K-12 education. 10% is university education. Taken together that's over half the state costs right there. So if a typical family of 2 parents with 3 children moves to your state, the state gains the revenue of 2 additional tax payers, but incurs the cost of 3 more kids to educate. And since those people are probably going to move to the sprawling suburbs, you're going to have non-linear growth in transportation costs from simple geometry. Do you see how government spending might be not perfectly in sync with population growth? And 1.2% over the bare minimum is not egregious.
Suck it up, pay your fair share or move to the libertarian paradise of Somalia.
According to your own link, population/inflation is up by 5.8% annually; raising spending by 8% annually isn't out of line.
And Arizona is near the bottom of the tax revenue per capita list
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_tax_levels
So you're not paying that much to begin with.
That's fair enough. Let's apply the same math to highways. Billions of dollars for highway construction and maintenance. A million drivers a year times $0 per driver and that will paid off when? Help me out, I'm fuzzy on the math here.
Slashdot Mirror
The top tax bracket for individuals is 35%.
We've been comparing ourselves with Rome since at least the 70s.
The Roman Empire took a couple of centuries to fall from its peak, so the people making the comparison for a few decades still might be right.
Atomic Force Microscopes start in the range of $10,000, you could easily build one in your own basement. Electron Microscopes are more expensive, but still very common at labs doing this type of thing. Depending on what types of bonds are being formed, there's all types of spectroscopy that could be done. Really, verifying the results is just basic chemistry.
Yet another way of the looking at it is that both are equally bad, but atheists are just more efficient.
Interesting example because at least some of the Allies (the Soviet Union) were clearly not good guys in any sense and committed atrocities that were equal to or greater than those committed by the "bad guys".
Prescription drug abuse is across the country.
The drugs are being sold by "patients" or used recreationally. Prescription drug abuse is the prevalent type of drug use. This is easy money for the poor kids.
While I agree with you're basic premise of opening up the data, I think your view of the statistics is a bit limited. Anyone can draw a trend line and calculate error bars, but when multiple data sets have conflicting data, it requires to a great deal of understanding of experimental methods, theoretical models, etc. to determine which datasets are most relevant to make what kind of conclusions. The "tricks" come from matching up tree ring data, ice core data, satellite data, direct measurements and many others. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses these methods is where an expert is needed and why your undergraduate math major is less than useful.
This whole project isn't going to last past its first accident. Some millionaire going up in flames will kill idea of space tourism.
And what if the failure rate is comparable to the Space Shuttle ~2%. How many people are going to pay for a 90 minutes, $10,000 that has a 1/50 chance of killing you?
nuclear rockets aren't clean enough to use on a populated planet.
Why does this keep getting repeated? An Orion-type launch would require less than 1000 nuclear devices of about .15 kT yield each. Considering that the US and Soviet Union test thousands of devices with much high yields with minimal environmental impact, using nuclear rockets aren't the doomsday scenario that people think.
But that's necessary even if you defend only property rights. Even a libertarian government would still have police to defend the property rights and courts to settle disputes which mean they would have to tax which means they would have to take money by threat of violence and imprisonment. You're not avoiding the dilemma, you're just prioritizing the "rights" that are important to you over the rights that are important to people less fortunate than you.
Even within a states, comparisons are dubious: Austin, TX, is one of the safest cities in the country, but Dallas and Houston are among the most dangerous. How does your red/blue ideology account for that?
Don't be such a jerk. There are plenty of reasons to be sceptical about the utility of such a system. The history of technology development has plenty of "clever" ideas that were ultimately dead ends (eg Cue Cat). "Find that killer app" is very difficult step. Your example didn't convince me since none of those activities (reading, email, teleconference) can't already be done as good or better with a laptop or handheld computer.
Considering its a health insurance bill and not a car insurance bill or a life insurance bill, then no it doesn't and it shouldn't address your unrelated concerns.
Transmetroplitan is a direct riff on Hunter S Thompson. The Sandman struck me as being extremely derivative of the a lot "New Wave" fantasy from the '70s. Stuff like Roger Zelazny, Philip José Farmer, Michael Moorcock, Ursula K. Le Guin.
I've read all those. They're good comics, but they're not good enough to elevate the whole genre. Transmetropolitan and Sandman are basically rip-offs (or homages to be nice) of previous works, they don't even stand on their own. Watchmen works best as a deconstruction of superhero comics and if you don't care about the genre in the first place, it has nothing to offer.
That's not how you do a citation. At least name the journal. A Web of Knowledge search give no results for those author names and year.
And the fact that you don't think there's any strategy in sports just demonstrates your own ignorance. I don't know where to even start with that.
That means you can't just make up magical anti-Darwinian species that doesn't try to fill every available evolutionary niche because they have mysteriously got a gene to tell them to stay home.
Honestly, that basically describes humans. Sure there is a small fraction that want to explore and colonize the universe and an even tinier fraction who is willing to put forward the effort to try to achieve those goals. But you'll find that the vast, vast majority of people of this planet don't care and are more than to stay on the planet.
Most people never even move a few miles from the place they were born. The explorers in our species are the exceptions.
And then you reply with crazy tax theories. How is that relevant? Do you think the state of Arizona has any constitutional authority to tax IP?
If anything, the increase in population should yield a net increase in revenues, so that you wouldn't have to raise the rates.
Again, using your own link: 42% of Arizona's budget is K-12 education. 10% is university education. Taken together that's over half the state costs right there. So if a typical family of 2 parents with 3 children moves to your state, the state gains the revenue of 2 additional tax payers, but incurs the cost of 3 more kids to educate. And since those people are probably going to move to the sprawling suburbs, you're going to have non-linear growth in transportation costs from simple geometry. Do you see how government spending might be not perfectly in sync with population growth? And 1.2% over the bare minimum is not egregious.
Suck it up, pay your fair share or move to the libertarian paradise of Somalia.
According to your own link, population/inflation is up by 5.8% annually; raising spending by 8% annually isn't out of line. And Arizona is near the bottom of the tax revenue per capita list http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_tax_levels So you're not paying that much to begin with.
Wow, you and at least two people are still laboring under the delusion that highways are paid for exclusively by gas tax. Check out this $42 billion Arizona transportation plan that is paid for by an increase in SALES tax. http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0504transpo-projects0504.html
That's fair enough. Let's apply the same math to highways. Billions of dollars for highway construction and maintenance. A million drivers a year times $0 per driver and that will paid off when? Help me out, I'm fuzzy on the math here.