Pai straight up said that the majority of the legitimate comments were in favor of net neutrality. Now that is proven to be an obvious lie as we all suspected all along. Why would they be lying about this unless you're fundamentally wrong here?
That's a good question but I suspect the answer is "never" and the real story hidden beneath this facade of incompetence is whatever crimes Gundotra was committing that he was afraid this guy would find out about if he got involved too much in decision making.
That was my first thought too, but it could also just be undereducated "power users" who had just lost remote access to their LAN without realizing the security implications of everyone else having access, too.
You're a liar and a shill, but the lies you've told others don't weigh nearly as much as the lies you've told yourself. You're neither dispassionate, nor Libertarian and your word choice in this post proves it to us. You are yourself a fascist racist.
Would anybody want an open source project to be distributed as a snap?
I'm glad you asked. It's basic "NIH" syndrome. Anyone using snaps has an unresolved grudge against existing distributions. By trying to shoehorn a competing package management system into all of them, they can intercept user's package installation requests while doing an end-run around the authority of the distro maintainers. This is the "extend" phase of Microsoft's famed "EEE" strategy.
The package format isn't what makes Plex suck, and changing it won't make it suck less. Don't use plex. Don't use snaps. Don't look at this news as a validation of either. They're both traps.
It may be the first you've heard about it but it is not the first time mistrust about specific ports on SuperMicro server boards has been expressed to me by mutual customers. And, at the time, no mention was made of the Chineese or any specific attacker, but my response was otherwise very similar to yours. Derision, disdain, arrogant contempt. Stupid naivety.
Those aren't what we're talking about here. Verizon is letting traffic with completely spoofed IDs of other company's valid customers pass through to other company's valid customers. The inbound stuff they're marking as SPAM for you isn't their own criminal enterprise, it's their competition's.
It's clear as daylight to me that they can't clean their own house. It's not clear whether they're aware of that and trying to fix it, or aware of that and trying to cover it up, though. In either case they're failing.
It would probably be an overall improvement but there would still be problems unless you could somehow find a way to filter 5th columnists from the random selection process ahead of time.
This post was the most on-point. Basically Verizon is allowing this type of fraudulent traffic to pass through their network unfettered. They've been publicly called out on it, too. Here on Slashdot, even. They're the primary offender in America at least right now, but I'm sure plenty of smaller players have dirty hands too. This would all stop if they flipped a switch.
Well, I believe he cares in the sense that it is important to his goals to appear to be working on it. Most likely he's actively stifling any chances of fixing the situation though.
Slashdot Mirror
... when we had these things called smart phones you could use when you didn't need a more powerful computer.
But my Grandma started voting Democrat after she died...
Pics or it didn't happen.
*weren't
Pai straight up said that the majority of the legitimate comments were in favor of net neutrality. Now that is proven to be an obvious lie as we all suspected all along. Why would they be lying about this unless you're fundamentally wrong here?
It doesn't matter whether it's unfounded or not. Artists tend to do their best work with positive reinforcement.
You haven't hung around with many UI designers, have you? The mentality is a necessary part of the personality type.
That's a good question but I suspect the answer is "never" and the real story hidden beneath this facade of incompetence is whatever crimes Gundotra was committing that he was afraid this guy would find out about if he got involved too much in decision making.
That was my first thought too, but it could also just be undereducated "power users" who had just lost remote access to their LAN without realizing the security implications of everyone else having access, too.
No, that guy is just a vandal. This guy is a hero.
They're just getting rid of the ones that aren't associated with the accounts of paying advertisers.
This is what I meant by "too late."
You're a liar and a shill, but the lies you've told others don't weigh nearly as much as the lies you've told yourself. You're neither dispassionate, nor Libertarian and your word choice in this post proves it to us. You are yourself a fascist racist.
Way too late now. Damage is done. Most people already think those were real US citizens and will now cry "censorship."
(And in case anyone was wondering, the unresolved grudge is usually about refusal to carry their trash spyware.)
Would anybody want an open source project to be distributed as a snap?
I'm glad you asked. It's basic "NIH" syndrome. Anyone using snaps has an unresolved grudge against existing distributions. By trying to shoehorn a competing package management system into all of them, they can intercept user's package installation requests while doing an end-run around the authority of the distro maintainers. This is the "extend" phase of Microsoft's famed "EEE" strategy.
The package format isn't what makes Plex suck, and changing it won't make it suck less. Don't use plex. Don't use snaps. Don't look at this news as a validation of either. They're both traps.
It's definitely coming for that lab assistant who kept knocking it over with the ball first.
Wait, are we supposed to care about wireless charging here or not?
It may be the first you've heard about it but it is not the first time mistrust about specific ports on SuperMicro server boards has been expressed to me by mutual customers. And, at the time, no mention was made of the Chineese or any specific attacker, but my response was otherwise very similar to yours. Derision, disdain, arrogant contempt. Stupid naivety.
Those aren't what we're talking about here. Verizon is letting traffic with completely spoofed IDs of other company's valid customers pass through to other company's valid customers. The inbound stuff they're marking as SPAM for you isn't their own criminal enterprise, it's their competition's.
Using the term "brain faggots" doesn't really help your argument any.
It's clear as daylight to me that they can't clean their own house. It's not clear whether they're aware of that and trying to fix it, or aware of that and trying to cover it up, though. In either case they're failing.
It would probably be an overall improvement but there would still be problems unless you could somehow find a way to filter 5th columnists from the random selection process ahead of time.
This post was the most on-point. Basically Verizon is allowing this type of fraudulent traffic to pass through their network unfettered. They've been publicly called out on it, too. Here on Slashdot, even. They're the primary offender in America at least right now, but I'm sure plenty of smaller players have dirty hands too. This would all stop if they flipped a switch.
Well, I believe he cares in the sense that it is important to his goals to appear to be working on it. Most likely he's actively stifling any chances of fixing the situation though.