But, if you were putting a lot of current into the negative conductor, then you actually will see a difference between the negative conductor and ground. If on top of that, you short to negative, then the GFCI will have some additional lag.
Red Hat used to be sold in stores, for $99, and that included some service time. I've also seen howto books include the distro they describe (I have one with SuSe 9.3 cost about $20). The problem is that they get out of date so fast. Ubuntu LTS is once a year, and another major release every October. Suse was on 10.2 when I bought that book.
I worked at CC from 99 to 02, and they had the 110% the whole time. At the end, they got rid of commisioned sales people, and everyone was paid an hourly wage. That was the end, IMO.
If it's so terrible, how do you explain this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw
The wii remote has sensors for accelration, which can't by themselves give you position.
The sensor bar gives you position in the room (angle, and distance). The accelerometers are, IMO, secondary to the infrared camera. I think the accelerometers aren't used at all for pointing games, and are used only for broad motion games. I bet they get a lot better for strong acceleration.
Maybe made in China, but the majority of that $400 is to pay for the design and development for the phone. There's nothing that says the engineering was definitely done in the US, but considering it's google, I would expect so.
Does the gov't deserve to take $150 or whatever on it? I don't know, call you congressman and figure that out. I'm pretty sure there's a lot of thought that goes into trade laws and a lot less thought that goes into deciding they aren't for you, and skipping around them.
The Colorado School of Mines uses steam from the beer making process at Coors to heat their buildings. There is a whole interconnected network of steam pipes underneath the city of Golden.
Perceived risk is interesting because it varies greatly with the amount of control people have on the situation.
People are disproportionately afraid of lightening and plane crashes. But they aren't afraid of crossing the street when there's no cross walk, driving, or doing their own home electrical work.
I can't help but argue with you. Spread spectrum communications aren't new. They require a lot of different frequencies, with low power. They often operate under the noise floor, which is why the military likes them so much.
The problem is that the FCC likes to put restrictions in place on frequency, and on power. Since the UHF bandwidth now has a new owner, it's up to the new owner to decide what gets broadcasted there. Saying things like the google device will voluntarily avoid channels that are already used is no good. It needs to be in the laws, which will require lots of regulation, and compensation.
This article is very slim on the technical details, but I'm guessing that what they really want to do is get approval to use the spectrum at different frequencies just like they do with the 2.4GHz spectrum now with wireless N. The difference is that the total bandwidth will be much greater because it will span a larger number of frequencies. The FCC might think this is OK if they limit the power production so that each person can really only hurt their own bandwidth, and not their neighbor's TV. Similar to those little FM transmitters you can get for your ipod, except for a different purpose.
Another thing that needs to be mentioned is that each channel doesn't only have a frequency it's centered on, it also has a width. A simple example is an audio signal. You know that uncompressed audio from a CD has the ability to reproduce sound from about 20Hz to 20,000Hz in stereo, for left and right audio. If I move that signal to be centered at 1,000,000Hz (ch 0) then it will take up the space between 979,999 - 1,020,000Hz. It's 20,000Hz up(for the left, let's say) and 20,000Hz down(for the right). If channel 1 is at 1,030,000Hz, then there is no room between the channels for any communication without causing interference. They don't pack them that close though, because the filters aren't perfect. The extra room is what they are trying to fill, and justifying it by saying that it will be so low power that it won't bother anyone.
What happens though, if you got a copy of a Metallica CD from them, would it then be outside of the copy rights? Could you then give a copy to your friend and sell them on ebay perhaps?
Exactly! How does "I have concerns" turn into "I do not like" I have concerns about my video game habits. That does _not_ mean that I don't like my video game habits.
I want to see some media with an "RIAA Free" sticker on it so I know where to spend my money. I recently left grad school for a job that actually pays money, and now I don't really mind paying for records. I just want to know where to plop the cash so that I'm not feeding the beast that would have loved to attack me a year ago.
It might be that the technology means better copies, easier process to make copies, or greater distribution across the vast internet. It could be that the legal framework and standards have changed to make this type of litigation feasible.
I would argue that the nail in the coffin that makes this so much different than recording to tape on your home recorder has to do with accountability. No one knew who, if anyone was recording the album. Know one knew if you gave your friend a copy a tape you bought. But now, there's an address of the offender.
I have a feeling that chuck is going to make fun of geeks more than give geeks a character to rally around. Therefore, it is not a geek show, it is a show with a geek as a main character.
There have been geek shows in the past that everyone enjoys. The Pretender comes to mind.
It would also be useful for a human driver that was hurt in such a way that would make it difficult to drive out of harm to be able to puch a "go to the medic" button.
Also, the motivation for this project is up for debate, especially since this technology is already being created by military contractors independently. Maybe this is to create opportunities for commercial opperations to learn how to make this technology. Maybe this is just to try to enlighten the public on what has been researched for years and will soon come to use.
Slashdot Mirror
But, if you were putting a lot of current into the negative conductor, then you actually will see a difference between the negative conductor and ground. If on top of that, you short to negative, then the GFCI will have some additional lag.
Red Hat used to be sold in stores, for $99, and that included some service time. I've also seen howto books include the distro they describe (I have one with SuSe 9.3 cost about $20). The problem is that they get out of date so fast. Ubuntu LTS is once a year, and another major release every October. Suse was on 10.2 when I bought that book.
I can adjust, download, customize and registry edit just as much on Windows as I can on Linux.
Then your time should be worth more than $25 to $30 an hour.
This is why layering software is such a good idea.
the ipv4 software:
ip_object.GetIPHandle()
looks a lot like the ipv6 software:
ip_object.GetIPHandle()
Object Oriented Programming For The Win!
I worked at CC from 99 to 02, and they had the 110% the whole time. At the end, they got rid of commisioned sales people, and everyone was paid an hourly wage. That was the end, IMO.
If it's so terrible, how do you explain this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw The wii remote has sensors for accelration, which can't by themselves give you position. The sensor bar gives you position in the room (angle, and distance). The accelerometers are, IMO, secondary to the infrared camera. I think the accelerometers aren't used at all for pointing games, and are used only for broad motion games. I bet they get a lot better for strong acceleration.
Does the gov't deserve to take $150 or whatever on it? I don't know, call you congressman and figure that out. I'm pretty sure there's a lot of thought that goes into trade laws and a lot less thought that goes into deciding they aren't for you, and skipping around them.
Try these things out on your DVD player first, as an experiment. Then you are out only $20.
The Colorado School of Mines uses steam from the beer making process at Coors to heat their buildings. There is a whole interconnected network of steam pipes underneath the city of Golden.
Perceived risk is interesting because it varies greatly with the amount of control people have on the situation. People are disproportionately afraid of lightening and plane crashes. But they aren't afraid of crossing the street when there's no cross walk, driving, or doing their own home electrical work.
I can't help but argue with you. Spread spectrum communications aren't new. They require a lot of different frequencies, with low power. They often operate under the noise floor, which is why the military likes them so much.
The problem is that the FCC likes to put restrictions in place on frequency, and on power. Since the UHF bandwidth now has a new owner, it's up to the new owner to decide what gets broadcasted there. Saying things like the google device will voluntarily avoid channels that are already used is no good. It needs to be in the laws, which will require lots of regulation, and compensation.
This article is very slim on the technical details, but I'm guessing that what they really want to do is get approval to use the spectrum at different frequencies just like they do with the 2.4GHz spectrum now with wireless N. The difference is that the total bandwidth will be much greater because it will span a larger number of frequencies. The FCC might think this is OK if they limit the power production so that each person can really only hurt their own bandwidth, and not their neighbor's TV. Similar to those little FM transmitters you can get for your ipod, except for a different purpose.
Another thing that needs to be mentioned is that each channel doesn't only have a frequency it's centered on, it also has a width. A simple example is an audio signal. You know that uncompressed audio from a CD has the ability to reproduce sound from about 20Hz to 20,000Hz in stereo, for left and right audio. If I move that signal to be centered at 1,000,000Hz (ch 0) then it will take up the space between 979,999 - 1,020,000Hz. It's 20,000Hz up(for the left, let's say) and 20,000Hz down(for the right). If channel 1 is at 1,030,000Hz, then there is no room between the channels for any communication without causing interference. They don't pack them that close though, because the filters aren't perfect. The extra room is what they are trying to fill, and justifying it by saying that it will be so low power that it won't bother anyone.
I agree, I meant that as a joke...
or...
We've found the root, now we just need the password...
or...
You Must Be Root To Do That!
I don't think the video is real time.
I am only spending about $60/month right now. You say I can get a connection to the new internet for only $60 more per month! Sign me up!
I wouldn't be surprised if HD-DVD will end up in the hands of Sony, just to be dismantled.
What happens though, if you got a copy of a Metallica CD from them, would it then be outside of the copy rights? Could you then give a copy to your friend and sell them on ebay perhaps?
Awesome, I'll just go copy as many wikipedia articles as I can, and just bathe in the millions of dollars I will get.
Exactly! How does "I have concerns" turn into "I do not like" I have concerns about my video game habits. That does _not_ mean that I don't like my video game habits.
I want to see some media with an "RIAA Free" sticker on it so I know where to spend my money. I recently left grad school for a job that actually pays money, and now I don't really mind paying for records. I just want to know where to plop the cash so that I'm not feeding the beast that would have loved to attack me a year ago.
It might be that the technology means better copies, easier process to make copies, or greater distribution across the vast internet. It could be that the legal framework and standards have changed to make this type of litigation feasible.
I would argue that the nail in the coffin that makes this so much different than recording to tape on your home recorder has to do with accountability. No one knew who, if anyone was recording the album. Know one knew if you gave your friend a copy a tape you bought. But now, there's an address of the offender.
I have a feeling that chuck is going to make fun of geeks more than give geeks a character to rally around. Therefore, it is not a geek show, it is a show with a geek as a main character. There have been geek shows in the past that everyone enjoys. The Pretender comes to mind.
I do that with my toner! I thought of it first, somebody needs to sign a check...
It would also be useful for a human driver that was hurt in such a way that would make it difficult to drive out of harm to be able to puch a "go to the medic" button. Also, the motivation for this project is up for debate, especially since this technology is already being created by military contractors independently. Maybe this is to create opportunities for commercial opperations to learn how to make this technology. Maybe this is just to try to enlighten the public on what has been researched for years and will soon come to use.
right hand driving means the driver is on the right side of the car.