How can you tolerate a country that has "we will kill all jews world-wide" in it's constitution (note they do clarify that if they ever get the Jews they will come after everyone else - you just can't make this up. Unfortunately, it's not a joke)
Sounds like a fair response to a country that is founded on a religious (bullshit) principle that they can steal it from their inhabitants because their Big Juju (Allah) has given it to them And it’s even a fairer response that they had waited half a century before proclaiming that death warrant on their invadors
Every once in a while throughout History, people get pissed-off enough at the jews so they try to exterminate them. The common point in there is the jews who get their head inflated by their mindboggingly stupid religion and act like total assholes, pissing-off everyone else in the process.
It’s really time to implement the real final solution: have the jews dump their fucking religion; teaching children that crap should be totally prohibited so in 2 generations, there will be no significant number of jews left.
No one laments the loss of the sumerians, well, no one will lament the loss of the jews, and they, themselves will finally be able to live the lives of normal people without facing the prospect of their extermination.
Can’t be done? Sure it can. The french have ditched their mindboggingly stupid religion when it was clear that it brought them only misery. If the french have done it, surely the jews can do it too.
Well, when civilized (that is, evolved) people see the way the sionists behave like primitive savages (bombing children with white phosphorus), it is not surprising that they get upset at a bunch of assholes who have their head inflated by their mindboggingly stupid primitive religion.
Sionists behave like the cavemen of the old testament. It’s not for nothing that every once in a while, people get fed up with them and try to exterminate them, those people are really obnoxious assholes (which is confirmed by the way they act).
Israel really has very little choice in the matter.
Oh, yes they have a lot of choice: they can pack up and get the fuck out of the middle-east, and go back to where they came from (Europe), and make sure they don’t act obnoxiously so people get pissed-off at them and try to exterminate them yet another time.
A good way to do so would be for them to ditch their absurdinly stupid religion* so it does not inflate their heads.
* All religions are absurdingly stupid; I am an equal-opportunity religion hater.
(I don't want to tar all or even most Americans with this brush, but the high level of IRA funding that came from the US is openly accepted).
That’s because the IRA’s fight is the same the US went through back around 1776.
And IRA’s fight is just as legit, by the way. It's the limeys' indomitable pigheadedness that is the source of all the trouble. They only need to dump Northern Ireland to EIRE; the orangists who live there will then appropriately dealed with by the irish or they will be repatriated to England, where they belong.
Nutria (679911) And I've got to wonder how you make a living. With such a high ID, though, I've got to wonder if you still live w/ Mom and Dad, or are maybe in that fantasy world known as University.
The Taliban aren't well-off, and THEY are willing to suicide to fight a regime they oppose.
Er, actually, not really.
The taliban are having a harder time finding suicide bombers (I guess the most likely prospect all dried-up?). Oh, and I regularly hang with army intelligence officers involved in Afghanistan.
The solution is obvious: a bullet for every single mollah, mufti and ayatollah.
We have to make a stand. Religion has had a million years to develop ways to insinuate itself in the brains of men and corrupt and rot their minds. Religion stands in the way of liberty, freedom and enlightenment, so it must be eradicated with all the vigour one can muster. And until ignorance is thoroughly eradicated, we cannot rest, for the forces of obscurity have had a lot of experience in spreading itself through Mankinds. Why should Liberty call for the freedom of those most opposed to it and who do so by subverting Society itself?
"Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest". — Denis Diderot
There is no way those 30,000 people can be all sued; if those pool, say 10£ each, that’s 300,000£ available to pay for sollicitors to defend those who are sued.
I'm sorry, but there is a whole lot of circumstances here beside what the oh-so-informative title says. The record label and the mall need to be held responsible for that total cluster fuck.
It is surprising that fire protection laws were not invoked; having watched a bit of the video, and seeing how the mall was pack-jammed full, the number of people present surely violated the fire safety codes (they could not have been evacuated in a timely manner in case of fire).
Curious, how is television advertising controlled in Canada? In the US corporations, collectives, etc.. usually spend tons of money advertising "their views" for a candidate. They didn't donate, they are just exercising "free speech".
There is no “free speech” in Canada. Remember? We’re the redcoats.
I have a flag in my house that I fly every June 24th. That flag is banned (it is prohibited to sell it), and I can be sent to jail for flying it.
Like 85% of people in Canada, I believe that we should get rid of the queen. Ooops, that’s “sedition”. I can be sent to jail for saying that.
So with a context like this, it's a no-brainer to restrict who can say whatever during an election.
Indeed. Canada has yet to implement the WIPO treaty "obligations" despite the treaty having been signed long ago (this is why it's legal to share music up here).
I was one of those who modded you flamebait. Just so we're clear, I understand that "flamebait" does not mean "I disagree."
LOL! I was modded 3 “insightful” anyways (I'm quoting your whole post so people can see it, mr Coward)
The whole tone of your post is incendiary.
Indeed. I cannot stand bullshit, and religion is pretty big on my bullshit radar.
You have a hypothesis, that the gay marriage issue is all about religion and control, which I partially agree with (the religion part). But then you go on to paint all religious people, a group to which I used to belong, as hell-bent on indoctrination and control.
It is not all religious people who want control. Many people want control, and religion is a way of controlling people.
This is either a gross misunderstanding or a deliberate provocation. You leave no room for genuine belief that homosexuality is wrong, no matter how misguided that belief may be.
I don’t need to give room for that belief, it already has too much.
Words like yours only further polarize the positions instead of trying to guide the people who hold those beliefs into a more enlightened practice of their religion.
Not my problem. They decide to to tie-up their brains with their religion, fine. It's like those $RACIAL_EXPLECTIVE who wear pants around their ankles; they decide to hobble themselves, so they cannot win the marathon.
I am french, and we decided to dump our religion in the garbage heap of History, because it was retarding us. Everyone is free to do the same, and the sooner the better, so there is no way I’m gonna make it easy for someone who’s religious and who won’t dump his stupid religion.
The religious certainly don’t make it easy for us, so why the fuck should I be holier than them??? It only reinforces their beliefs if I accommodate them.
You also nullified your whole argument when you brought masturbation into the picture.
Look, if you have a problem with fapping, it’s **YOUR** problem. Don’t make it mine. I personally have no problem with it, and I have no problem talking about it in person. Heck, I choke my chicken 3-4 times a day, and I do not see anything wrong with it.
Some churches do teach against that as well, but by your logic they should be crusading harder against masturbation or single men than anything else, since they are supposedly the hardest to control.
The priests know very well that if they piss-off too much single men, those single men will have their hides Besides, men will seldom admit not being good with women, which masturbation tends to imply, so no one will boast about masturbating, given the stigma it carries.
Let's not forget the hint of misogyny buried in there as well. Your last sentence is unequivocally flamebait, since you apparently fail to recognize that religion has benefits as well as drawbacks, and you show a complete lack of respect for anyone who shows any inclination to religion.
I will respect religion when religion will respect science and reality. Which will obviously be when the devil will be speed-skating in a sexy lycra outfit. Religion has no respect for those who do not follow it, so why should it deserve any respect???
You seem to have been really hooked-up a lot on that religious crutch. But, as I said, it is solely **YOUR** problem. You alone can dump it in the garbage heap of History. Don’t make it my problem.
That is sad, and represents a prejudice of your own that is as onerous as the one you're railing agains
It seeks to intimidate people into not supporting cause they believe in, and to open up their lives to harassment and ostracism because they have gone against societies current grain.
And, pray tell, how is this any different from the ordinary, mundane, run-of-the-mill gay-bashing gays are routinely subject to???
Though fucking noogies. She got what she deserved for blindly following her religion. She attempted to fuck her customers, and her customers took their business elsewhere. At least, she should get the life lesson that
Why is this any different than rednecks not patronizing a pinko-commie business???
Slashdot Mirror
Sounds like a fair response to a country that is founded on a religious (bullshit) principle that they can steal it from their inhabitants because their Big Juju (Allah) has given it to them And it’s even a fairer response that they had waited half a century before proclaiming that death warrant on their invadors
Every once in a while throughout History, people get pissed-off enough at the jews so they try to exterminate them. The common point in there is the jews who get their head inflated by their mindboggingly stupid religion and act like total assholes, pissing-off everyone else in the process.
It’s really time to implement the real final solution: have the jews dump their fucking religion; teaching children that crap should be totally prohibited so in 2 generations, there will be no significant number of jews left.
No one laments the loss of the sumerians, well, no one will lament the loss of the jews, and they, themselves will finally be able to live the lives of normal people without facing the prospect of their extermination.
Can’t be done? Sure it can. The french have ditched their mindboggingly stupid religion when it was clear that it brought them only misery. If the french have done it, surely the jews can do it too.
Well, when civilized (that is, evolved) people see the way the sionists behave like primitive savages (bombing children with white phosphorus), it is not surprising that they get upset at a bunch of assholes who have their head inflated by their mindboggingly stupid primitive religion.
Sionists behave like the cavemen of the old testament. It’s not for nothing that every once in a while, people get fed up with them and try to exterminate them, those people are really obnoxious assholes (which is confirmed by the way they act).
Oh, yes they have a lot of choice: they can pack up and get the fuck out of the middle-east, and go back to where they came from (Europe), and make sure they don’t act obnoxiously so people get pissed-off at them and try to exterminate them yet another time.
A good way to do so would be for them to ditch their absurdinly stupid religion* so it does not inflate their heads.
* All religions are absurdingly stupid; I am an equal-opportunity religion hater.
Every fox I have asked has said that you are required to give him the key to your henhouse, too.
Just because a cop says so doesn't make it correct.
That’s because the IRA’s fight is the same the US went through back around 1776.
And IRA’s fight is just as legit, by the way. It's the limeys' indomitable pigheadedness that is the source of all the trouble. They only need to dump Northern Ireland to EIRE; the orangists who live there will then appropriately dealed with by the irish or they will be repatriated to England, where they belong.
Mirror here.
(This text is just random oxdung to fool the stupidness filter on /.).
Hmmm. Yes, I wonder how YOU make a living
Er, actually, not really.
The taliban are having a harder time finding suicide bombers (I guess the most likely prospect all dried-up?). Oh, and I regularly hang with army intelligence officers involved in Afghanistan.
The solution is obvious: a bullet for every single mollah, mufti and ayatollah.
We have to make a stand. Religion has had a million years to develop ways to insinuate itself in the brains of men and corrupt and rot their minds. Religion stands in the way of liberty, freedom and enlightenment, so it must be eradicated with all the vigour one can muster. And until ignorance is thoroughly eradicated, we cannot rest, for the forces of obscurity have had a lot of experience in spreading itself through Mankinds. Why should Liberty call for the freedom of those most opposed to it and who do so by subverting Society itself?
"Men will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest". — Denis Diderot
Excuuuuse me, but we had to struggle very hard against the british in order to get, first a responsible government, then some kind of democracy (only landowners could vote, and votes were not secret) and finally, true democracy (everyone could vote). What little liberty we have today we earned, yes, but we are not trough fighting for still more liberty.
Freedom of speech wears-out only if you don’t use it.
— Maurice Maréchal, founder of the satirical french weekly “Le Canard Enchaîné“.
Yeah, so? It’s not the military-entertainment-industrial complex that makes the laws, but parliaments.
They can huff and puff all they want, but that does not make it force of law in any case.
Insurance is the key.
There is no way those 30,000 people can be all sued; if those pool, say 10£ each, that’s 300,000£ available to pay for sollicitors to defend those who are sued.
It is surprising that fire protection laws were not invoked; having watched a bit of the video, and seeing how the mall was pack-jammed full, the number of people present surely violated the fire safety codes (they could not have been evacuated in a timely manner in case of fire).
There is no “free speech” in Canada. Remember? We’re the redcoats.
I have a flag in my house that I fly every June 24th. That flag is banned (it is prohibited to sell it), and I can be sent to jail for flying it.
Like 85% of people in Canada, I believe that we should get rid of the queen. Ooops, that’s “sedition”. I can be sent to jail for saying that.
So with a context like this, it's a no-brainer to restrict who can say whatever during an election.
And we don’t have the slightest problem with it.
Indeed. Canada has yet to implement the WIPO treaty "obligations" despite the treaty having been signed long ago (this is why it's legal to share music up here).
Last CD I bought was 10 years ago. Ever since then, I download and copy from the library (it’s all legal here, though).
LOL! I was modded 3 “insightful” anyways (I'm quoting your whole post so people can see it, mr Coward)
Indeed. I cannot stand bullshit, and religion is pretty big on my bullshit radar.
It is not all religious people who want control. Many people want control, and religion is a way of controlling people.
I don’t need to give room for that belief, it already has too much.
Not my problem. They decide to to tie-up their brains with their religion, fine. It's like those $RACIAL_EXPLECTIVE who wear pants around their ankles; they decide to hobble themselves, so they cannot win the marathon.
I am french, and we decided to dump our religion in the garbage heap of History, because it was retarding us. Everyone is free to do the same, and the sooner the better, so there is no way I’m gonna make it easy for someone who’s religious and who won’t dump his stupid religion.
The religious certainly don’t make it easy for us, so why the fuck should I be holier than them??? It only reinforces their beliefs if I accommodate them.
Look, if you have a problem with fapping, it’s **YOUR** problem. Don’t make it mine. I personally have no problem with it, and I have no problem talking about it in person. Heck, I choke my chicken 3-4 times a day, and I do not see anything wrong with it.
The priests know very well that if they piss-off too much single men, those single men will have their hides Besides, men will seldom admit not being good with women, which masturbation tends to imply, so no one will boast about masturbating, given the stigma it carries.
I will respect religion when religion will respect science and reality. Which will obviously be when the devil will be speed-skating in a sexy lycra outfit. Religion has no respect for those who do not follow it, so why should it deserve any respect???
You seem to have been really hooked-up a lot on that religious crutch. But, as I said, it is solely **YOUR** problem. You alone can dump it in the garbage heap of History. Don’t make it my problem.
Sure it does; it is right on the progress’ side.
If she had her eyes wide open, she certainly had not her mind wide open, and thus didn't see that this would come and bite her arse.
And, pray tell, how is this any different from the ordinary, mundane, run-of-the-mill gay-bashing gays are routinely subject to???
Intimidation is nothing but a tool to ensure social compliance.
Yes, it’s called “islam”
Though fucking noogies. She got what she deserved for blindly following her religion. She attempted to fuck her customers, and her customers took their business elsewhere. At least, she should get the life lesson that
Why is this any different than rednecks not patronizing a pinko-commie business???
Impossible. Otherwise, any legislator would simply need to say “I have 200,000 signatures against this or that”, and no one could be able to verify.