I'm not that good at bow hunting. Or would you have me get rid of the sticks with razor sharp broadheads on the end too?
How about people with swords? This is a geek site, there's probably a bunch of us. Those are dangerous weapons too. Luckily, your kid is probably only going to kill himself mishandling those.
A gun does not have to be a danger to people around it, it just needs to be respected as much as we teach kids to respect cars by looking both ways. If you have guns, teach your kids about them, show them how to use them safely, and store them securely (trigger locks, gun safes, ammo and gun kept in separate locations). Just remember that education is an important part of that, because it's entirely possible for the kid to run into guns somewhere else, and you don't want that to be the first time.
The kind who is wearing headphones or earplugs, and just gets a kick out of both disrupting the calls of people who are on phones, and irritating the piss out of everyone else when the phone people start shouting.
Assuming you can hit the right amount of hydrogen sulfide. If, on the other hand, everyone thinks they're going to die, and breathes deep in a panic, the rescue workers can bore their way into the still oxygenated chamber, and find that everyone died of hydrogen sulfide poisoning.
Security professionals can be proven wrong, all it takes is someone listening to them. Suppose a security professional stated that guns were dangerous, and outlawing guns would make people safer. Then someone outlaws guns, and voila, the reverse happens. The security professional has just been proven wrong.
Huh. That reminds me of the time I got Influenza B, was out sick for a week, and when I got back my voice sounded like I had been gargling gravel. On the other hand, your policy would have denied a legitimate request, which is better than accepting a bad request.
They could be more tightly focused, giving extra range for the same power. It's not unreasonable to think that EMPs could be used to shoot down planes one degree of airspace at a time.
Slashdot Mirror
Happened my sophomore year. That was the same year someone else let loose pigeons in the fieldhouse (gymnasium).
Wrong crowd for that analogy.
It was a different government then. Except for the part where they set up camps for Japanese-Americans.
Ah yes, the other kind of brute force attack.
Improv Everywhere will have a field day with this.
Wow, I misread your user name, and thought it was Twitter calling out himself. Crazy.
I'm not that good at bow hunting. Or would you have me get rid of the sticks with razor sharp broadheads on the end too?
How about people with swords? This is a geek site, there's probably a bunch of us. Those are dangerous weapons too. Luckily, your kid is probably only going to kill himself mishandling those.
A gun does not have to be a danger to people around it, it just needs to be respected as much as we teach kids to respect cars by looking both ways. If you have guns, teach your kids about them, show them how to use them safely, and store them securely (trigger locks, gun safes, ammo and gun kept in separate locations). Just remember that education is an important part of that, because it's entirely possible for the kid to run into guns somewhere else, and you don't want that to be the first time.
The kind who is wearing headphones or earplugs, and just gets a kick out of both disrupting the calls of people who are on phones, and irritating the piss out of everyone else when the phone people start shouting.
Assuming you can hit the right amount of hydrogen sulfide. If, on the other hand, everyone thinks they're going to die, and breathes deep in a panic, the rescue workers can bore their way into the still oxygenated chamber, and find that everyone died of hydrogen sulfide poisoning.
Huh. Didn't know that. Thanks.
Sure it is. 1 ton = 2000 lbs. Weight.
Security professionals can be proven wrong, all it takes is someone listening to them. Suppose a security professional stated that guns were dangerous, and outlawing guns would make people safer. Then someone outlaws guns, and voila, the reverse happens. The security professional has just been proven wrong.
Someone who should be involved with security issues. Note that this does not preclude terrorism.
That sounds like nanotech from Soviet Russia.
I'd be happy to test out a system with a terabyte of RAM. Send one over, I'll figure something out.
Huh. That reminds me of the time I got Influenza B, was out sick for a week, and when I got back my voice sounded like I had been gargling gravel. On the other hand, your policy would have denied a legitimate request, which is better than accepting a bad request.
My PS2 only has green and red LEDs. Is this a slim PS2 thing, a typo for PS3, or an incredibly inept troll?
It'd put evolutionary pressure on hicks to not shoot at them. It's a lesser victory, but a victory nonetheless.
That's what happens when you're never allowed to take the server down for maintenance.
That's not odd, an OS is easy to replace. Data is where things get difficult/expensive.
I'm betting that something that takes a few seconds to go through armor would go through flesh like nobody's business.
They could be more tightly focused, giving extra range for the same power. It's not unreasonable to think that EMPs could be used to shoot down planes one degree of airspace at a time.
Because they don't know where we are. They've got some other planet now (then?)
It gets even better if you use Tor. They tell me about hot singles in -countries- I've never been in.