Ok maybe. But this guy is either lying under oath and risks perjury or this congressman should be in jail. So which is it? Are you going to claim a huge conspiracy?
If you are a computer user, you are responsible for the problems they are creating. ISP's need to inform people they have bots and if they are infecting other computers they need their internet access dropped. Tough love.
Being that they are "natural monopolies" they have much more to lose by refusing to cooperate with the government, actually. "Hippy McFreakington" by comparison has a lot less to lose (borrowed from "America the Book").
I mean they have to face the dual pressure of an American public who would view them as "hating America" for going against the NSA as well as the pressure of a federal investigating agency demanding the tapes.
I'd say that's untested constitutional matter, but normally the president gets impeached and then tried in Congress for any and all crimes. You cannot "arrest" the President, as he is the leader of the executive branch and that would give mid-level bureaucrats quite a lot of power.
There's a theory that this guy who claimed to have killed Ramsey never set foot in Colorado and admitted to the case so he'd be extradicted to the US (Thai prisons are kinda bad). The whole event just doesn't seem likely IMO.
Whatever the reason is for American abysmal public education, a lack of funding isn't one of them. The US spends more per pupil that like all other nations except Korea (this stat is from memory). This is if you take into account state, local, and federal spending. Throwing more money at the problem won't make it better.
There is no way Slashdot would be defending Microsoft if an MS product were to suddenly enter the lexicon as a common verb.
What will it take Google to do for Slashdot to criticize them? If Google executives were arrested for eating babies, there'd be people in here claiming that they had no other choice but to eat babies, and that everyone eats babies and that they needed to eat babies because Microsoft executives eat babies.
Yeah but we should work to lessen the risks as long as they are reasonable and do not interfere with our "core values" like freedom of speech, etc. I don't think being prohibited from carrying certain items on board is unreasonable. People act like they are living under a dictatorship in here.
A bunch of terrorists will rent an Ryder or UHaul truck, fill it to the brim with whatever explosives they can conjur up (probably nitrogen bombs), and drive it into a tunnel or bridge and blow it up. It's nearly impossible to stop.
Slashdot Mirror
Ok maybe. But this guy is either lying under oath and risks perjury or this congressman should be in jail. So which is it? Are you going to claim a huge conspiracy?
We had such ballots in 2000 but the Democrats were too stupid to use them properly. Hence, we get Diebold and electronic voting.
Errr, do all "euroweenies" believe everything they are told?
Sorry but even Bev Harris thinks he's full of shit.
Blah blah W is evil blah blah blah Abu Ghraib blah blah Halliburton blah blah blah Incurious blah blah blah WMD's blah blah blah
If you are a computer user, you are responsible for the problems they are creating. ISP's need to inform people they have bots and if they are infecting other computers they need their internet access dropped. Tough love.
Being that they are "natural monopolies" they have much more to lose by refusing to cooperate with the government, actually. "Hippy McFreakington" by comparison has a lot less to lose (borrowed from "America the Book").
I mean they have to face the dual pressure of an American public who would view them as "hating America" for going against the NSA as well as the pressure of a federal investigating agency demanding the tapes.
No, he is not "immune from prosecution". It's just that he can only be prosecuted by Congress.
I'd say that's untested constitutional matter, but normally the president gets impeached and then tried in Congress for any and all crimes. You cannot "arrest" the President, as he is the leader of the executive branch and that would give mid-level bureaucrats quite a lot of power.
The only recourse to "arrest" the president is impeachment.
There's a theory that this guy who claimed to have killed Ramsey never set foot in Colorado and admitted to the case so he'd be extradicted to the US (Thai prisons are kinda bad). The whole event just doesn't seem likely IMO.
Whatever the reason is for American abysmal public education, a lack of funding isn't one of them. The US spends more per pupil that like all other nations except Korea (this stat is from memory). This is if you take into account state, local, and federal spending. Throwing more money at the problem won't make it better.
What percentage of each country thinks that 9/11 (or 11/9) was perpetrated by the US government? There are kooks in all countries.
Eh, Christian fundamentalists were never the cool kids in my school.
There is no way Slashdot would be defending Microsoft if an MS product were to suddenly enter the lexicon as a common verb.
What will it take Google to do for Slashdot to criticize them? If Google executives were arrested for eating babies, there'd be people in here claiming that they had no other choice but to eat babies, and that everyone eats babies and that they needed to eat babies because Microsoft executives eat babies.
Yeah but we should work to lessen the risks as long as they are reasonable and do not interfere with our "core values" like freedom of speech, etc. I don't think being prohibited from carrying certain items on board is unreasonable. People act like they are living under a dictatorship in here.
it ain't much good if you're dead. On the other hand, being alive ain't much good if you ain't free. So clearly a balance is needed.
You don't feel a tad scared when you get on a plane?
Just a suggestion. Or take the bus.
after David Lee Roth left. ;)
I don't think it's money. Tobacco companies could make just as much money if they sold "doobies".
some drugs?
Caffeine, alcohol, and tobacco are all "psychotropic" substances.
A bunch of terrorists will rent an Ryder or UHaul truck, fill it to the brim with whatever explosives they can conjur up (probably nitrogen bombs), and drive it into a tunnel or bridge and blow it up. It's nearly impossible to stop.
You know, written by some "artsy" chick who takes pictures of her feet.