the Republicans gained three more senate seats so replacing RPG will be even easier and almost ensures they will maintain control of the Senate even through the next election cycle.
Maybe two, maybe three. One is at a runoff. But the Democrats won the majority of seats up for grabs this year. Keep in mind, they had half their Senate seats up for election, the republicans only had 25%. And, in 2020 it's reversed. Esp. since Collins and a lot of other moderate Republicans are up. I imagine a democratic senate is likely to show up.
Now, you're right about RBG's replacement, if that happens. But it doesn't seem to matter. They already put whomever on the court.
You also don't seem to understand that the whole House stands for election, so the margin this year doesn't really matter for next year. But, the home of Nixon and Reagan went blue for the first time in a century.
While the Senate and Trump do what they like
You mean, aside from pass laws. Yeah, they can fuck up the judiciary, but other than that they're pretty unable to effect change.
Trump just isn't a stunning genius. His skill is media manipulation and flooding the zone. And yes, Dems shouldn't swing at this. It's not important.
I assume you're talking about the whole "gender" definition thing? Cause there were a lot of poeple explaining why it was dumb. For instance, a good percentage of people (1/200) are born with two sets of genitals. The percent of people who present normally but not just an XX or XY genome is higher than that. When you're talking about the government messing up 4.5 million people's lives, it matters. Esp. since there is no benefit.
And note, that's all pure biology. If you factor in transgender people (and I personally think you should), it gets more ridiculous. But you don't have to.
TL;DR the dictionary is usually a bad source for detailed information. Heck, even laws tend to use words in ways differently than the dictionary.
Nevermind that the email record laws were not new for Hillary. Her staff admitted the previous Secretary of State told her to use a personal server to specifically get around that "onerous" reporting.
You completely misunderstand. The new rule was that you could not use a personal server to get around the reporting. Both of Hillary's predecessors did so. So, they changed the rules and she didn't comply with the new version.
That Windows 2000 server was one long forgotten and no longer used
Care to point to a link, cause I never heard this before.
The "pinging" from Russia was not much more than that.
There was the bank pinging. But, IIRC, both the Russians and the Chinese have a lot more traffic going on.
Care to summarize? Cause "watch this video" isn't really acceptable as a forum response. At least by itself. IF you said "here's a video that goes further" I would understand.
While that is the reason people hate unions, its a double-lie. First, most people won't get the brass ring, so they lie to those people. Second, if you want, a union can support the brass ring methodology. It just lets people agree that 80 hr weeks are unacceptable in seeking that ring.
here is NO claim she used her personal e-mail AFTER she became a Government employee.
Or, if you read the article, that's what this is about. I don't give a shit about Hillary's emails. What Ivanka did is wrong and she should be punished.
The whole article is that kind of disgusting what-aboutism. The fact is that the email retention rules only really started applying at the beginning of the Obama administration*, so it's possible that Hillary made a mistake. There is no possibility Ivanka didn't know this was against the rules. To say nothing about how I expect more computer literacy from a 36 year old than a 70 year old.
But, yeah, fuck both of their private email systems.
* Both Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private email as Sec. of State.
ow is using the Trump Organization's server any better than using one in her own home or office?
IIRC, during the campaign it came out that the Trump Org. server was a Win 2000 box. (Democrats argued that's how it was obvious they were the ones targeted, cause Trump's would have been trivial to hack.) Further, there is pretty ample evidence that both China and Russia have been pinging machines in Trump Tower at least since he announced.
So, it's probably far less secure, and probably already compromised.
There's also the factor that the record laws about email were at least new when Hiliary was SOS; Ivanka had a year and half lesson on it from her dad and every newspaper.
So, a website with programming tools is primarily used by people who use web technologies. Shocking. Meanwhile, most C++ people are probably just all self-hosting repos.
If you do that, the better question would be "at what point will you let an employer chip you". Because, frankly, I would not at my current job. But I I have my price. If someone offered me enough of a salary bump, contingent on getting chipped, I would.
That said, I don't think these really are needed for security. Cards + pins seem to work just fine.
That's true, if the person you're framing has resources. Otherwise, it works 20% of the time. And given that something like 1/4 of Americans cannot put together $400 in an emergency, you have a 8% chance of it working.
They had a similar story last year, and the year before. It's not true. If it was, the last thing they would do is tell everyone that they can see stealth plans (or at least how they did it so it could be duplicated/nullified.) But it's not true. It's designed to impress someone, I'm not sure who.
Fingerprint analysis is normally limited to returning a "match"/"no match" on the suspect. So, if you didn't have an example of the fingerprint, it's a 20% chance of working.
There's even a commercial on TV now about how great the fingerprint password system is on their laptop... that they show off by having a child use your fingerprint while you're asleep. See, you don't even have to get woken up or supervise your kids to authorize them for whatever they want.
It seems clear. "It's not clear to [me, the article's author] why Zuckerburg would be so petty [even though he is]. That said, it's still a good decision because [I, the article's author] think Android is better. As evidence, I will say many people outside the US use Android, so FB should only use Android internally to appeal to them."
FB is worse. FB is more addictive, spys on you, and lets other people spy on you. Apple just wants you to keep wrtiing them checks (or CC approvals.)
I used to be afar bigger fan of both Apple and MS than Google, at least from a business plan side. Thye both said "give us money, then STFU". Google spied on me. Now, only Apple just wants cash.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe two, maybe three. One is at a runoff. But the Democrats won the majority of seats up for grabs this year. Keep in mind, they had half their Senate seats up for election, the republicans only had 25%. And, in 2020 it's reversed. Esp. since Collins and a lot of other moderate Republicans are up. I imagine a democratic senate is likely to show up.
Now, you're right about RBG's replacement, if that happens. But it doesn't seem to matter. They already put whomever on the court.
You also don't seem to understand that the whole House stands for election, so the margin this year doesn't really matter for next year. But, the home of Nixon and Reagan went blue for the first time in a century.
You mean, aside from pass laws. Yeah, they can fuck up the judiciary, but other than that they're pretty unable to effect change.
Trump just isn't a stunning genius. His skill is media manipulation and flooding the zone. And yes, Dems shouldn't swing at this. It's not important.
I assume you're talking about the whole "gender" definition thing? Cause there were a lot of poeple explaining why it was dumb. For instance, a good percentage of people (1/200) are born with two sets of genitals. The percent of people who present normally but not just an XX or XY genome is higher than that. When you're talking about the government messing up 4.5 million people's lives, it matters. Esp. since there is no benefit.
And note, that's all pure biology. If you factor in transgender people (and I personally think you should), it gets more ridiculous. But you don't have to.
TL;DR the dictionary is usually a bad source for detailed information. Heck, even laws tend to use words in ways differently than the dictionary.
You completely misunderstand. The new rule was that you could not use a personal server to get around the reporting. Both of Hillary's predecessors did so. So, they changed the rules and she didn't comply with the new version.
Care to point to a link, cause I never heard this before.
There was the bank pinging. But, IIRC, both the Russians and the Chinese have a lot more traffic going on.
Care to summarize? Cause "watch this video" isn't really acceptable as a forum response. At least by itself. IF you said "here's a video that goes further" I would understand.
While that is the reason people hate unions, its a double-lie. First, most people won't get the brass ring, so they lie to those people. Second, if you want, a union can support the brass ring methodology. It just lets people agree that 80 hr weeks are unacceptable in seeking that ring.
No, they explicitly are not retroactive. They're not admitting anything bout the old numbers.
Which is good, because otherwise they may have to admit some people gamed the system.
This is why you unionize. So workers get a larger share of the profits.
The multidirectional treadmills exist. I know HTC has used them to show off the VIVE, and there was a kickstarter for them a while ago.
Or, if you read the article, that's what this is about. I don't give a shit about Hillary's emails. What Ivanka did is wrong and she should be punished.
It does. That part doesn't seem to be in dispute.
He may have won, but he dropped out of the race for a while.
The whole article is that kind of disgusting what-aboutism. The fact is that the email retention rules only really started applying at the beginning of the Obama administration*, so it's possible that Hillary made a mistake. There is no possibility Ivanka didn't know this was against the rules. To say nothing about how I expect more computer literacy from a 36 year old than a 70 year old.
But, yeah, fuck both of their private email systems.
* Both Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private email as Sec. of State.
IIRC, during the campaign it came out that the Trump Org. server was a Win 2000 box. (Democrats argued that's how it was obvious they were the ones targeted, cause Trump's would have been trivial to hack.) Further, there is pretty ample evidence that both China and Russia have been pinging machines in Trump Tower at least since he announced.
So, it's probably far less secure, and probably already compromised.
There's also the factor that the record laws about email were at least new when Hiliary was SOS; Ivanka had a year and half lesson on it from her dad and every newspaper.
Given that they seem to be releasing new versions more often than once a year now, you don't want them to slow down?
So, a website with programming tools is primarily used by people who use web technologies. Shocking. Meanwhile, most C++ people are probably just all self-hosting repos.
If you do that, the better question would be "at what point will you let an employer chip you". Because, frankly, I would not at my current job. But I I have my price. If someone offered me enough of a salary bump, contingent on getting chipped, I would.
That said, I don't think these really are needed for security. Cards + pins seem to work just fine.
Where do you get Win 7 licenses anymore?
That's true, if the person you're framing has resources. Otherwise, it works 20% of the time. And given that something like 1/4 of Americans cannot put together $400 in an emergency, you have a 8% chance of it working.
It's been in the news several times lately as its worked through the review process. I'm guessing Randall had the strip ready to go.
They had a similar story last year, and the year before. It's not true. If it was, the last thing they would do is tell everyone that they can see stealth plans (or at least how they did it so it could be duplicated/nullified.) But it's not true. It's designed to impress someone, I'm not sure who.
Fingerprint analysis is normally limited to returning a "match"/"no match" on the suspect. So, if you didn't have an example of the fingerprint, it's a 20% chance of working.
There's even a commercial on TV now about how great the fingerprint password system is on their laptop... that they show off by having a child use your fingerprint while you're asleep. See, you don't even have to get woken up or supervise your kids to authorize them for whatever they want.
It seems clear. "It's not clear to [me, the article's author] why Zuckerburg would be so petty [even though he is]. That said, it's still a good decision because [I, the article's author] think Android is better. As evidence, I will say many people outside the US use Android, so FB should only use Android internally to appeal to them."
FB is worse. FB is more addictive, spys on you, and lets other people spy on you. Apple just wants you to keep wrtiing them checks (or CC approvals.)
I used to be afar bigger fan of both Apple and MS than Google, at least from a business plan side. Thye both said "give us money, then STFU". Google spied on me. Now, only Apple just wants cash.
Huh? What do you mean? Only kids are getting hired? Or are you saying 7 years is insufficient?