I will say that for many types of entertainment (experience once), streaming is usually cheaper. Because there is zero value to owning it (well, the ability to lend it to a friend). But that works far better for movies/TV than for games that are 20+ hour experiences.
That's... just not true. Sure, there is a lot of experimentation in private industry. But there's also a some well done governmental experimentation, and certainly excellent "trying of ideas" in public universities.
I will point out your grandmother almost certainly started with a recipe and measurements, even if those recipes were oral instructions from a relative, and the measurements were someone overseeing and correcting her eyeballing.
The 'm' subdomain is where a lot of sites host their mobile version. In fact, I think most mobile browsers will try the m subdomain if you don't specify one, before failing over to the www one.
Safari has a "web site" view that shows the domain (and only the domain, with a lock/none for http/https). This view doesn't show the www or m sudomains (but does show others). It also doesn't show the rest of the URL. As soon as you ask Safari (by clicking), it goes back to a complete URL.
Contrast this with Chrome, where I cannot even get it to display the protocol in any way. One's a simplification with the ability for more info. The other is Google being a dick.
For Fuck's Sake Slashdot. Fix your damn headlines.
Google's experiment showed no difference between $117 in cash, and $117 in stuff. However, it turns out, $534 in cash gives a much better outcome. The result isn't "cash is much better than stuff." It's "$117 isn't enough, and you really need to get closer to $534."
It's sad that, since this information was in the fucking summary no one read it. But to have self-congratulatory backslapping about the free-market is nonsense on top of that. The free market is good for many things. While it may be better in a charity context, the ability to prevent short term spending (candy, not potatoes), purchase in bulk, get larger donations of goods instead of cash, react to more macro trends, may make it better to ship goods. I mean, the free market should definitely decide a lot of things. But it's not at all clear it has a place with charitable relief.
While that's true from a currency point of view, I actually was talking about transactions that treated bitcoin as a commodity worth of trading. After all, there are a lot of transactions in hyperinflationary areas too, but very few transactions to and from hard currencies.
because money is only transferred, there were just as many winners
No. The total dollars were the same. The number of sellers was much smaller than the number of buyers. Cause most people weren't buying a billion dollars in stock, but some people were certainly selling it.
Higher market caps, and more maturity. With more people involved, more transactions, and more history, there should be less volatility. The market cap means it's more important. Look at it this way, it went from having the market cap and trades per day of a penny stock, to the market cap and trades per day of a major corporation. Those two trade pretty differently.
FANG is Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google. Apple is already pretty "community standards"-y. Netflix only posts their own content. Facebook doesn't give a shit what's on it, as long as you keep reading it. Same for Google. All they care about is dollars.
Should passes be given for tests, reports, and projects?
Reasonable accommodations are made for tests. Extra time, etc. The purpose of a test i to assess knowledge. If someone doesn't speak English, giving them in a test in English is pretty useless.
e need to raise people to overcome their disadvantages, not revel in them.
We need to raise people who understand whether they are overcomeable or not, and that it varies by person. Will power won't let someone in a wheelchair run the 800m, and it's entirely possible that there are other, less obvious reasons. Some psychological conditions are insurmountable, some are just fear. Being able to determine which is which is important.
Where is the motivation to work hard and live within your means anymore?
Well, this just changes your means, so I don't see how it wouldn't also encourage you to live within your means. Actually, it may help, because you can afford to make decisions on a longer timeline.
As for what the motivation is to work hard, well, a lot of people like luxuries. Or maybe just existing beyond minimum sustenance.
Slashdot Mirror
You don't need FTL, you need to break LOS limitations
I will say that for many types of entertainment (experience once), streaming is usually cheaper. Because there is zero value to owning it (well, the ability to lend it to a friend). But that works far better for movies/TV than for games that are 20+ hour experiences.
That's... just not true. Sure, there is a lot of experimentation in private industry. But there's also a some well done governmental experimentation, and certainly excellent "trying of ideas" in public universities.
It's too bad that's how you approached it. You could have learned something at no extra cost.
"Did something really stupid" means "trying to get an education because public education in the US has gradually become worthless?"
I will point out your grandmother almost certainly started with a recipe and measurements, even if those recipes were oral instructions from a relative, and the measurements were someone overseeing and correcting her eyeballing.
The 'm' subdomain is where a lot of sites host their mobile version. In fact, I think most mobile browsers will try the m subdomain if you don't specify one, before failing over to the www one.
It's not that I trust www.domain.tld but not m.domain.tld. It's that sometimes I want to be on the www site, and sometimes I want to be on the m site.
Not everything has to be about security.
That said, smarter people than me will probably come up with reasons.
Safari has a "web site" view that shows the domain (and only the domain, with a lock/none for http/https). This view doesn't show the www or m sudomains (but does show others). It also doesn't show the rest of the URL. As soon as you ask Safari (by clicking), it goes back to a complete URL.
Contrast this with Chrome, where I cannot even get it to display the protocol in any way. One's a simplification with the ability for more info. The other is Google being a dick.
You think corporations were moral until Trump was elected??
For Fuck's Sake Slashdot. Fix your damn headlines.
Google's experiment showed no difference between $117 in cash, and $117 in stuff. However, it turns out, $534 in cash gives a much better outcome. The result isn't "cash is much better than stuff." It's "$117 isn't enough, and you really need to get closer to $534."
It's sad that, since this information was in the fucking summary no one read it. But to have self-congratulatory backslapping about the free-market is nonsense on top of that. The free market is good for many things. While it may be better in a charity context, the ability to prevent short term spending (candy, not potatoes), purchase in bulk, get larger donations of goods instead of cash, react to more macro trends, may make it better to ship goods. I mean, the free market should definitely decide a lot of things. But it's not at all clear it has a place with charitable relief.
While that's true from a currency point of view, I actually was talking about transactions that treated bitcoin as a commodity worth of trading. After all, there are a lot of transactions in hyperinflationary areas too, but very few transactions to and from hard currencies.
I mean, Beanie Babies and Magic cards aren't handmade, but they've both fit a similar role before.
No. The total dollars were the same. The number of sellers was much smaller than the number of buyers. Cause most people weren't buying a billion dollars in stock, but some people were certainly selling it.
Higher market caps, and more maturity. With more people involved, more transactions, and more history, there should be less volatility. The market cap means it's more important. Look at it this way, it went from having the market cap and trades per day of a penny stock, to the market cap and trades per day of a major corporation. Those two trade pretty differently.
Well, if it's an English Language course, sure. If it's an English literature course, it's possible that the translations are good enough. Who knows.
But most oral presentations aren't in a speech class. They're in history, or english, or any other soft subject.
FANG is Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Google. Apple is already pretty "community standards"-y. Netflix only posts their own content. Facebook doesn't give a shit what's on it, as long as you keep reading it. Same for Google. All they care about is dollars.
Reasonable accommodations are made for tests. Extra time, etc. The purpose of a test i to assess knowledge. If someone doesn't speak English, giving them in a test in English is pretty useless.
We need to raise people who understand whether they are overcomeable or not, and that it varies by person. Will power won't let someone in a wheelchair run the 800m, and it's entirely possible that there are other, less obvious reasons. Some psychological conditions are insurmountable, some are just fear. Being able to determine which is which is important.
Well, this just changes your means, so I don't see how it wouldn't also encourage you to live within your means. Actually, it may help, because you can afford to make decisions on a longer timeline.
As for what the motivation is to work hard, well, a lot of people like luxuries. Or maybe just existing beyond minimum sustenance.
Well, probably the hash values of every copyrighted work.
That's why we only need to work 3 or 4 days a week. We're already wasting so much time. Might as well do something we like instead.
It's not just size, it's also speed. Slowly moving over cities, dropping tons of rain.
Yeah, flood insurance was supposed to be temporary, to give people to move to a new home.
Only if you're willing to cough up millions. It's "selling the naming rights" not "vote on names."
And for what it's worth, they already offer opportunities to vote on names.