Not really, every link to them on slashdot has [jonesday.com] next to it which is what they wanted from the website they sued. Perhaps if slashdot changed the site so that [jonesday.com] didn't appear.. maybe..
and I think people who only play open source games are lame because they ignore the rich landscape of games in favour of their ideology.
You people are also really boring to talk to because as soon as you mention a proprietary game you have to negativity rant about how non-free it is, like how you're doing now.
They [police] don't have the power to install cameras. However not allowing a license because the premises doesn't have CCTV is perfectly acceptable, just like how you'd lose a license if the hygiene was unacceptable.
I don't see why you care so much since the police haven't got access to the CCTV footage without physically asking for it.
I'm sure you'd feel differently if you got badly hit by a drunken idiot and there was no evidence, wait what am I saying. You're a raving privacy loon, you don't go outside.
I can think of numerous times where putting cameras in pubs is useful in England. The amount of times where people are being glassed (where someone rams a glass into your face, cutting you up) and the total level of drunken violence each week is just asking for more evidence to convict these idiots that go out each week to get drunk then violent on purpose.
Begging? I doubt it. I bet no one has even bothered to phone up the head office and contact someone, and no, email doesn't count.
If someone bothered to officially contact the company I bet they'd get specs right away. Problem is computer hackers don't think like that, they send an email which reaches the lowest area of support staff, it gets deleted and they give up then bitch on slashdot.
The parent AC is absolutely correct. Since the prosecution is trying to show that the pirate bay owners intend to purposely violate copyright where as the defense is sticking with the story that the pirate bay is a sharing website which only removes material if it is against the law or has misleading description.
As someone else noted in a different article (or perhaps website) it's going to be extremely difficult for the prosecution. It would be a contradiction to say that the people responsible for posting the child porn on the pirate bay are responsible rather then the admins, then say that any copyrighted material posted on TPB the admins are responsible for.
Firstly contractor work is VERY different from normal employement with a salary.
Secondly it's 2009 not 2008.
Thirdly, your example jobs are all about producing customised proprietary solutions for customers. That is not working on open source software, that is working WITH open source software.
1) She said she didn't have a phone 2) The phone was found between her ass cheeks after a strip search 3) She was sent multiple times to the admin side of the school and she gave the wrong phone number of her parents on purpose 4) She was a repeat offender and known to the officer
Also just because kids are suspended from school doesn't mean they don't show up to see their friends.
I'm the idiot? You're the one trying to make a point and using two year old fucking screenshot.. what the shit..
Go away twitter wannabe.
Out of all the stuff on the firehose this is what was picked for the slashdot main page?
Yes because do you really think the locals are going to report on human rights abuses against women in Iran?
I can see what that news report would look like right now..
because locals have a vested interest and lie.
If you have a political party between two sides, both bias, which is telling the truth. You need an independent third party.
What are you talking about we had both sim city and sim copter which allowed you to import your city from sim city.
Yet, you didn't mention one thing..
Because the link you're using doesn't exist. If you type it in it comes up "page not found".
Stop attributing to malice what can be explained by your own idiocy.
Did they get the money to buy this from the laid off workers?
You just hurt your own case. He abused his position and lost his job thereby proving that there isn't a problem.
Not really, every link to them on slashdot has [jonesday.com] next to it which is what they wanted from the website they sued. Perhaps if slashdot changed the site so that [jonesday.com] didn't appear.. maybe..
and I think people who only play open source games are lame because they ignore the rich landscape of games in favour of their ideology.
You people are also really boring to talk to because as soon as you mention a proprietary game you have to negativity rant about how non-free it is, like how you're doing now.
They [police] don't have the power to install cameras. However not allowing a license because the premises doesn't have CCTV is perfectly acceptable, just like how you'd lose a license if the hygiene was unacceptable.
I don't see why you care so much since the police haven't got access to the CCTV footage without physically asking for it.
I'm sure you'd feel differently if you got badly hit by a drunken idiot and there was no evidence, wait what am I saying. You're a raving privacy loon, you don't go outside.
In Soviet Russia, "joke" is still funny.
I can think of numerous times where putting cameras in pubs is useful in England. The amount of times where people are being glassed (where someone rams a glass into your face, cutting you up) and the total level of drunken violence each week is just asking for more evidence to convict these idiots that go out each week to get drunk then violent on purpose.
Begging? I doubt it. I bet no one has even bothered to phone up the head office and contact someone, and no, email doesn't count.
If someone bothered to officially contact the company I bet they'd get specs right away. Problem is computer hackers don't think like that, they send an email which reaches the lowest area of support staff, it gets deleted and they give up then bitch on slashdot.
The parent AC is absolutely correct. Since the prosecution is trying to show that the pirate bay owners intend to purposely violate copyright where as the defense is sticking with the story that the pirate bay is a sharing website which only removes material if it is against the law or has misleading description.
As someone else noted in a different article (or perhaps website) it's going to be extremely difficult for the prosecution. It would be a contradiction to say that the people responsible for posting the child porn on the pirate bay are responsible rather then the admins, then say that any copyrighted material posted on TPB the admins are responsible for.
You mean like this one that has absolutely nothing to do with working on open source software?
Firstly contractor work is VERY different from normal employement with a salary.
Secondly it's 2009 not 2008.
Thirdly, your example jobs are all about producing customised proprietary solutions for customers. That is not working on open source software, that is working WITH open source software.
The first couple of hits are from freelancer websites and the next ones are from 2006.
Have you got anything which isn't hyperbole?
Could you please show me the job offers to work on open source? I'll give you a day to find something and then check back on my post.
Google maps is high traffic but the particular street is not, hence number of viewers of the specific picture are in fact the same.
1) She said she didn't have a phone
2) The phone was found between her ass cheeks after a strip search
3) She was sent multiple times to the admin side of the school and she gave the wrong phone number of her parents on purpose
4) She was a repeat offender and known to the officer
Also just because kids are suspended from school doesn't mean they don't show up to see their friends.
How you going to call the parents when she keeps giving them the wrong number on purpose?
It would if you were the one receiving the texts. Now you're not concentrating on your lesson because of your idiot friend.
If they're texting other people in other classes then they are disturbing other students.