Better declare the radiation from warm baths and hot meals to be "microwave". And also better" heat your tissues "to be the same as" exposure to microwave radiation ".
I know it is fashionable to be an idiot, but this is ridiculous.
Linux doesn't need anything. People too unfortunate/stupid to lock themselves into bad software need things- including a greater support by the said bad software vendors.
I didn't say I am concerned, and I am actually not.
I did read the link, and the data is not complete to guarantee a nicotine cause of the ill-effects of tobacco - but their educated guess is that it is. At least, nicotine is not absolved of this, and can be said to may have participated in the ill effects.
While your living room is the problem of its inhabitants at any point in time, and Nicotine-Cancer hasn't been found very related, but...
Nicotine's effect on pregnant women and foetus is somewhat known and harmful. So the leakage from your living room, if any - and your open-air-smoking brethren : are definitely problems
There has been found a genetic negative correlation between cancer and most brain degenerative diseases - see https://www.ted.com/talks/greg....
Maybe you are not thankful enough for your genes which protect you from cancer?
Anyway, I have a slight family history of Parkinson's too - though not as much as yours. Any idea of the cancer incidence in the Parkinson's afflicted branch of your family?
I'll willing to bet that if you try and configure *any* laptop to meet the same specs as an Apple system you will end up at the same or greater price - and by that I mean all specs including weight and volume
Ok, and try and configure an Apple system to meet the same specs as most laptops - and you will end up with Apple system twice as expensive as the reference laptops.
Dried food hasn't been a viable staple since humanity invented the bottom billion.
What? Ever heard of wheat? Rice? World trade in wheat is greater than for all other crops combined. Rice is a large staple too. Wheat, rice, barley, corn (maize) are typically consumed like : dried state, which is then made wet again - generally while cooking them.
This world is living on dried food for a long time.
"I said nothing about a politically driven exodus being something that never happens. I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do."
?
Because in that statement, you were not concerned with the actual number of relocations, just the overlap (or lack thereof) between announced intentions of relocations and actual relocations.
Now you're saying you have no hope of ever getting information on the overlap, and are just basing your post on the actual relocations being low.
In fact, even the *TOTAL* number of people permanently residing in Canada who were born in the USA is only around half a million............. that's the total number of Americans who've moved into Canada *EVER*...
No, others could be American citizens born elsewhere who now permanently reside in Canada.
only around half a million... which is barely a tenth of the number of people that said they would leave if Obama was re-elected
So 5 million said they would leave, and half a million left. Or 100 people left. That might cause your statement "I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do" to be considered false. Unless we know the overlap between the 5 million, and the half-a-million; or the 5 million and the 100.
I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do
That is just making your claim more difficult to ascertain. For that, we need :
1. the number of people that claim to intend to leave in a certain situation; AND
2. the number of people that actually left in that situation; AND
3. the overlap between these people.
How do you intend to get these numbers? (1) and (2) are difficult as it is, (3) might be impossible for historical exoduses. Now, you can leave the burden of proof of *your* assertion to others, but that would be dishonest.
This also makes the claim useless and irrelevant in this context. The original post remains un-addressed, because even if people who say they would relocate to Canada don't relocate but others relocate, the need for pre-warming up Canada remains.
This is a mere syntactic fault with pascal's wager. You can replace the initial assumption with "whether a god that punished non-believers exists".
The fault can also be easily explained - he might be thinking of the God that is widely believed in his culture. Otherwise more faults can be found, like whether the God is capable of punishing non-believers, whether God knows if someone is a real believer or not, etc.
All these faults are not applicable because it is "widely" believed that God is omnipotent, omniscient, and loves sycophants.
And for the litigation period, Microsoft was still profitable in the EU. Until the feeble hands of the law can hurt the corporations in a meaningful way, it is called cost of doing business.
Until you gather your men in suits, your rant remains powerless, impotent. Even after that, it only means something if either some senior executives spend decades in jail, or the corporation reports losses over large areas for the duration the illegal activity benefits them.
Haha, the proof of the law is in the successful suing . All your impotent banter fails to explain one thing - why are Microsoft executives not behind bars on this one, or why isn't Microsoft explaining a few quarters of losses due to being fined by courts across the world?
In your imagination, all sorts of warm and cosy laws exist. I'll believe you gladly when I see one of the aforementioned proofs.
So, in a similar vein to "a friend of a friend is a friend", you are asserting customer's potential customer is a customer?
Advertiser is Microsoft's customer. The Microsoft product user, as seen by the advertiser, is a potential customer. Microsoft need not respect this user as an actual customer of Microsoft. Especially since this user fails to respect himself and ever stop using Microsoft products.
So what would they do if the suspect deliberately writes differently than he usually does?
Handwriting analysts claim that they can find the true writer from even a deliberately uncooperative sample provider.
Suspect deliberately changes his voice
Here, there is some evidence that there is some uniqueness to the voice that cannot be faked. Techniques such as these are used to synthesize voice - it should be possible to analyze voice of deliberately uncooperative sample provider.
Slashdot Mirror
Anthropomorphization helps a lot with learning and understanding - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Learn from that instead of finding obvious useless faults in ways of expressing oneself.
Better declare the radiation from warm baths and hot meals to be "microwave". And also better" heat your tissues "to be the same as" exposure to microwave radiation ".
I know it is fashionable to be an idiot, but this is ridiculous.
When was Windows renamed to "Other OS" ?
Linux doesn't need anything. People too unfortunate/stupid to lock themselves into bad software need things- including a greater support by the said bad software vendors.
I didn't say I am concerned, and I am actually not.
I did read the link, and the data is not complete to guarantee a nicotine cause of the ill-effects of tobacco - but their educated guess is that it is. At least, nicotine is not absolved of this, and can be said to may have participated in the ill effects.
While your living room is the problem of its inhabitants at any point in time, and Nicotine-Cancer hasn't been found very related, but ...
Nicotine's effect on pregnant women and foetus is somewhat known and harmful. So the leakage from your living room, if any - and your open-air-smoking brethren : are definitely problems
There has been found a genetic negative correlation between cancer and most brain degenerative diseases - see https://www.ted.com/talks/greg....
Maybe you are not thankful enough for your genes which protect you from cancer?
Anyway, I have a slight family history of Parkinson's too - though not as much as yours. Any idea of the cancer incidence in the Parkinson's afflicted branch of your family?
thanks
Actually, it will be : Don't drink coffee from your genitals.
I'll willing to bet that if you try and configure *any* laptop to meet the same specs as an Apple system you will end up at the same or greater price - and by that I mean all specs including weight and volume
Ok, and try and configure an Apple system to meet the same specs as most laptops - and you will end up with Apple system twice as expensive as the reference laptops.
Dried food hasn't been a viable staple since humanity invented the bottom billion.
What? Ever heard of wheat? Rice? World trade in wheat is greater than for all other crops combined. Rice is a large staple too. Wheat, rice, barley, corn (maize) are typically consumed like : dried state, which is then made wet again - generally while cooking them.
This world is living on dried food for a long time.
That is a fair statement, you had a weird way of saying that.
And yes, you're right, presidents have little actual power anyway.
So you take back your statement that
"I said nothing about a politically driven exodus being something that never happens. I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do."
?
Because in that statement, you were not concerned with the actual number of relocations, just the overlap (or lack thereof) between announced intentions of relocations and actual relocations.
Now you're saying you have no hope of ever getting information on the overlap, and are just basing your post on the actual relocations being low.
Your post is full of holes.
In fact, even the *TOTAL* number of people permanently residing in Canada who were born in the USA is only around half a million ............. that's the total number of Americans who've moved into Canada *EVER*...
No, others could be American citizens born elsewhere who now permanently reside in Canada.
only around half a million... which is barely a tenth of the number of people that said they would leave if Obama was re-elected
So 5 million said they would leave, and half a million left. Or 100 people left. That might cause your statement "I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do" to be considered false. Unless we know the overlap between the 5 million, and the half-a-million; or the 5 million and the 100.
I said that when they *announce* that they are going to move to Canada because of something like an election, they never actually do
That is just making your claim more difficult to ascertain. For that, we need :
1. the number of people that claim to intend to leave in a certain situation; AND
2. the number of people that actually left in that situation; AND
3. the overlap between these people.
How do you intend to get these numbers? (1) and (2) are difficult as it is, (3) might be impossible for historical exoduses. Now, you can leave the burden of proof of *your* assertion to others, but that would be dishonest.
This also makes the claim useless and irrelevant in this context. The original post remains un-addressed, because even if people who say they would relocate to Canada don't relocate but others relocate, the need for pre-warming up Canada remains.
This is a mere syntactic fault with pascal's wager. You can replace the initial assumption with "whether a god that punished non-believers exists".
The fault can also be easily explained - he might be thinking of the God that is widely believed in his culture. Otherwise more faults can be found, like whether the God is capable of punishing non-believers, whether God knows if someone is a real believer or not, etc.
All these faults are not applicable because it is "widely" believed that God is omnipotent, omniscient, and loves sycophants.
You have some serious aversion to posting your argument, for someone with signature like
If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
Though it is reasonable on your part to mark the people who post truths that uncomfortable for you - protects your cocoon.
PS : With a change in my e-mail client - I forgot to add my filter to junk foe/friend notification emails. Just added it back, thanks.
And for the litigation period, Microsoft was still profitable in the EU. Until the feeble hands of the law can hurt the corporations in a meaningful way, it is called cost of doing business.
Until you gather your men in suits, your rant remains powerless, impotent. Even after that, it only means something if either some senior executives spend decades in jail, or the corporation reports losses over large areas for the duration the illegal activity benefits them.
I won't be surprised. I'm much more convinced by the voice analysts.
Yes, I'm much more convinced by the voice analysts.
Haha, the proof of the law is in the successful suing . All your impotent banter fails to explain one thing - why are Microsoft executives not behind bars on this one, or why isn't Microsoft explaining a few quarters of losses due to being fined by courts across the world?
In your imagination, all sorts of warm and cosy laws exist. I'll believe you gladly when I see one of the aforementioned proofs.
So, in a similar vein to "a friend of a friend is a friend", you are asserting customer's potential customer is a customer?
Advertiser is Microsoft's customer. The Microsoft product user, as seen by the advertiser, is a potential customer. Microsoft need not respect this user as an actual customer of Microsoft. Especially since this user fails to respect himself and ever stop using Microsoft products.
a customer who already bought Windows because it met their requirements and functioned acceptably at the time should not subsequently find
The said customer agreed that Microsoft can do anything Microsoft wants to the software later.
From blood glucose. Or cholesterol.
So what would they do if the suspect deliberately writes differently than he usually does?
Handwriting analysts claim that they can find the true writer from even a deliberately uncooperative sample provider.
Suspect deliberately changes his voice
Here, there is some evidence that there is some uniqueness to the voice that cannot be faked. Techniques such as these are used to synthesize voice - it should be possible to analyze voice of deliberately uncooperative sample provider.
There is no number of dead that makes me change my mind
Any number of dead, that includes you, makes your mind irrelevant.