Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: What Do You Think Is The Most Influential Gadget Of All Time? (macrumors.com)

TIME has published a list ranking the 50 most influential gadgets of all time, from cameras and TVs to music players, smartphones, and drones. Can you guess what was the number one most influential gadget on the list? That's right, the Apple iPhone. "Apple was the first company to put a truly powerful computer in the pockets of millions when it launched the iPhone in 2007," according to TIME. "The iPhone popularized the mobile app, forever changing how we communicate, play games, shop, work, and complete many everyday tasks."

There's a lot of interesting gadgets on the list that have had a profound impact on mankind in some form or another, for better or worse. Do you agree with TIME's number one choice? What do you think is the most influential gadget of all time?

397 comments

  1. the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the gun

    1. Re:the gun by xevioso · · Score: 2

      The gun is a tool, not a gadget. It's like a hammer.

      Also, this list is a list of specific gadgets. So if you really wanted to make a point, you would have said something like a Spencer Repeater, a Colt 45, or a Winchester Model 1873 "The Gun that Won the West". Not just "a gun."

    2. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2
      You need to look up the definition of gadget:

      a small mechanical device or tool, especially an ingenious or novel one.

      Both the gun and (my first choice) hammer qualify.

      The knife beats both. Self-defense and attack, killing and skinning and cutting supper into bite-size chunks, It would later be lengthened into short swords and incorporated into rifles (bayonet). The needle is right up there, allowing for piercing animal skins so they could be laced or sewn together, allowing humans to spread much further than would have been possible with just loose animal furs, and making the first boots.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go, go gadget penis!

    4. Re:the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother refuting the first part of his post if you're going to ignore the second and more important part of his post?

    5. Re:the gun by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Of course it's a gadget. So's a hammer. "Gadget" means 'tool', or 'machine', or 'contraption', or 'pile of sticks that constitutes a deadly trap at the bottom of this hole'. Etc etc.

    6. Re:the gun by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A stick!
      OK, so a knife lets you create a better stick, and is easier to use for firelighting than sticks.

      As for your journal entry, personally I think it's about Facebook hitting peak stupid more than anything else. It's far more easy to be outspokenly stupid online than elsewhere so there is still hope for the world.

    7. Re:the gun by harlequinn · · Score: 1

      I say the knife beats the gun in world changing.

      Used in more conflicts.
      Used more in peacetime.
      Used for thousands of years longer.

      Time Magazine's idea of a gadget is very narrow. Their list only contains electric gadgets.

    8. Re:the gun by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      Keeping it simple: the pencil.

    9. Re:the gun by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Really? The requirement said "all time", it's a rock in your hand.

    10. Re:the gun by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The gun is a tool, not a gadget. It's like a hammer.

      If your only tool is a gun, everything looks like something to put bullets in.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    11. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Because I did refute the second part by offering alternatives that have contributed to human survival for 10s of thousands of years and contributed to us spreading across the globe, and determining who lived when attacked, either by an animal or another human. Guns simply can't claim anywhere near that much influence.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    12. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      A stick is actually a good one. It's been around since before we were human, our predecessors used them, they help the old walk,you can tie a bundle at the end of it and use it to carry stuff on one shoulder, or bundles on both ends and carry the weight on both shoulders. It extends your reach for everything from knocking fruit out of trees to helping someone else, it's the basic agricultural implement before other gadgets came around, it's a good weapon to keep someone else at bay, and if you sharpen and fire-harden the end, useful for all sorts of things from self-defense to killing. It's free, simple, and unless you're using it like a javelin, anyone with one can defeat someone who is unarmed with only a bit of training.

      Also a lot safer to use for poking an animal that's trying to climb up the tree to eat you than a knife. And you can also use it as a throwing stick to take down small game, since you don't have to spear the animal, just hit it. Tie a leather cup or one made out of a coconut and you've got a pretty good way to launch rocks at an enemy with a lot more force than if you do it by hand, and easier and quicker than a sling.

      As for my journal entry, I pointed out that the HRC (Human Rights Campaign) treats lesbians, transsexual women, racial minorities, etc., pretty badly. Gay White Mafia is the common term for them, and it has nothing to do with Facebook. The activities on Facebook are just a symptom of a far deeper problem that people are waking up to, and now talking about.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Keeping it simple: the pencil.

      Said the constipated mathematician - "so I can work it out!" :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    14. Re:the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are posting to the wrong crowd, sir. This bunch of rubens will spend the next 400 posts arguing that the gun was only the second most influential gadget.

      I, however, salute you and your wit.

    15. Re: the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First came fire, then the wheel, then the CPU of course.

    16. Re:the gun by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I saw a similar thing in the late 1980s from the sidelines when a bunch of idiots that just happened to be gay men tried to take over a show on community radio and kick the girls out. Become popular enough and some idiots will be among those who want to be part of the popular thing. Eventually the idiots went after a different shiny thing and left.

    17. Re:the gun by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      You need to look up the definition of gadget:

      a small mechanical device or tool, especially an ingenious or novel one.

      Both the gun and (my first choice) hammer qualify.

      The knife beats both. Self-defense and attack, killing and skinning and cutting supper into bite-size chunks, It would later be lengthened into short swords and incorporated into rifles (bayonet). The needle is right up there, allowing for piercing animal skins so they could be laced or sewn together, allowing humans to spread much further than would have been possible with just loose animal furs, and making the first boots.

      Definitely hammer, or its ancestor the big rock. The big rock was the gun of its time, of course. And technology begins with banging the rocks together.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    18. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Banging rocks together = fire starter. Sounds pretty influential.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re:the gun by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Banging rocks together = fire starter. Sounds pretty influential.

      Exactly. And, banging rocks together = sharp pieces of rock. Also influential.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    20. Re:the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the part where he pointed out that's about specific devices, not categories.

    21. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Gadgets can be generic. "Can opener" is such a gadget. so is "light bulb" or smartphone or computer or zipper.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    22. Re:the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are being deliberately dense. The article was about specific devices. But you know that already.

  2. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Refrigerator. Next crap question.

    1. Re:Thanks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Refrigeration in general, which includes both refrigerators and air conditioning.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A Refrigerator. Next crap question.

      That or the wheel and all its variations.

      Given that every refrigerator I've ever seen has rotating machinery in it - wheels! - I'd say the wheel wins.

    3. Re:Thanks! by xevioso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A refrigerator is not a "gadget" in the traditionally understood use of the term. it's an appliance. if we allow appliances, then we must allow the air conditioner, which is could easily be argued as more important. A TV is also an appliance, which is why I don't understand #2 on this list.

    4. Re:Thanks! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Well, refrigeration is nice, both in its ability to preserve food and its impact on our comfort.

      But:

      Food has been dried, smoked, and salted to preserve it's lifespan as nourishment for humans as long as humans have been the dominant life on the blue planet. Refrigeration extends the life of the most perishable items, but in turn, affords us dietary alternatives to the staple foods our metabolisms are best at burning for fuel.

      Sleeping in the comfort of controlled temperature and humidity makes every man a medieval king's envy, yet, comfort seemingly always weakens men.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Thanks! by tezbobobo · · Score: 1

      Yup - I heard that article too. Amazing invention, up there with the telegram.

    6. Re:Thanks! by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but refrigeration would be impossible without that little rotating electric thingy called an electric motor.

    7. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      we must allow the air conditioner, which is could easily be argued as more important

      Haha fucking pussy Americans. As a kid I lived on a top floor flat in a Mediterranean country which routinely reached over 40 degrees centigrade, and A/C wasn't even a Thing in residential properties outside the homes of the very rich.

      How to keep cool:
      0. Sit in the shade - tanning is for the insecure.
      1. Don't be fat - i.e. have self-discipline.
      2. Wear less - i.e. don't be a pussy Puritan.
      3. Enjoy water - drink, swim, etc.
      4. Whine less - your body is built to cope with the heat. Let it.

    8. Re:Thanks! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      2.A. Wear wet clothes. 0.A. In the shade
      This is huge. It can change a 105F extreme day into a functional working day.

    9. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Everybody here that dumb -- it's potable water.
      Yeah, you like to think that water everywhere is drinkable, but it's not.

      CAP === 'illusory'

    10. Re:Thanks! by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Yes, but refrigeration allowed people to bring western culture to places that did not have it before (rather than the other way around) because of the ability to travel further with a wider variety of provisions.

    11. Re:Thanks! by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Stupid Continentals.

      No one is saying people didn't survive, or even thrive, before the advent of the air conditioner. But modern white collar society around the world exists and has expanded because of climate controlled environments. The number of industries that would be affected if you could not control the temperature in which the work is being done is virtually unlimited. Who wants to work in a bank/warehouse/packing plant/law firm/supermarket/or you name it if it is super hot (or super cold)? Humans CAN do this, but it's undeniable that countless industries have expanded in large part because humans got the fundamentals down first: a working toilet, running water, and air conditioning.

    12. Re:Thanks! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      A refrigerator is not a "gadget" in the traditionally understood use of the term. it's an appliance.

      A quick check of the definition of "gadget" includes the usual list of synonyms. Oddly, "appliance" is a synonym for "gadget".

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    13. Re:Thanks! by TWX · · Score: 1

      Refrigeration technology also allows us to produce heat from electricity more efficiently and more safely than simply heating-up wires by passing current through them. Such allows us to further reduce dependence on chemical-reaction combustion, if we take the initiative to build power plants that don't chemically-burn fuel to make electricity.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    14. Re:Thanks! by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The electric motor is not strictly necessary. Automotive air conditioners rely on power taken from the crankshaft to turn the compressor.

      It probably has never been built, but it should be possible to build pneumatic-start into a mechanical-injected diesel truck, with a full-time, clutchless, belt-driven AC compressor, and with a belt and shaft-driven cabin fan, with a belt-driven compressor to recharge the compressed-air tank to drive the starter.

      Obviously there isn't a benefit in doing this, electrical technology is ubiquitous enough to where we generally can get away without having to go nuts to avoid it, but we could if we really, really wanted to.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    15. Re:Thanks! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Alcohol. Beer and wine allowed the common man to breed without judgement...

      like the other mammals.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    16. Re:Thanks! by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Wrong. I mean they were called an ICEBOX for a reason. They cut ice from rivers and lakes and kept it in warehouses and delivered it to your home. That's why the first electric refrigerators had the compressor on top; so it looked like an icebox.
      Then there's the paradoxical propane refrigerator that uses fire to cool.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Then there's the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    17. Re:Thanks! by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The term "gadget" usually implies a connotation of "small", whereas "appliance" in the traditional sense does not. An electric can opener, for example, is both a gadget and an appliance, and in that way they are synonyms, but a fridge is an appliance but not a gadget, just like an iWatch is a gadget but not an appliance.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    18. Re:Thanks! by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but refrigeration would be impossible without that little rotating electric thingy called an electric motor.

      And you couldn't charge your iPhone without the electric motor either. Unless you have one of those solar chargers. But that probably couldn't have been built without the electric motor.

    19. Re:Thanks! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking. But alcohol actually did contribute a good deal to modern civilization. Beer and wine allowed man to not be perpetually sick, and occasionally dying, from waterborne illness. Rum made routine long-duration ocean voyages possible; leading to trans-oceanic trade and colonization and, eventually, to the British Empire.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    20. Re:Thanks! by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      Yu my want to look t the coffman starter.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    21. Re: Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither of you have ever seen a gas operated fridge? No motor or electricity required. We used to have a kerosene fridge and lights.

    22. Re:Thanks! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Alcohol is not a gadget. Either that or one of us is doing it wrong.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    23. Re: Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still a pussy. I weld outside in the sun in plus 35 C wearing full denim. Quit being a bitch.

    24. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha fucking pussy Americans. As a kid I lived on a top floor flat in a Mediterranean country which routinely reached over 40 degrees centigrade, and A/C wasn't even a Thing in residential properties outside the homes of the very rich.

      It was probably a dry heat.

      Try 40 degrees with humidity and then get back to us.

    25. Re: Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Following that logic, I think I'm going to go with "the wheel." Or maybe "fire."

    26. Re:Thanks! by epine · · Score: 1

      Sleeping in the comfort of controlled temperature and humidity makes every man a medieval king's envy, yet, comfort seemingly always weakens men.

      What you're calling "comfort" allows the vast majority of the population to live past the age of thirty. Lack of "comfort" doesn't make you strong. It makes you dead or alive, where the "strong" tend to accrue to the second group.

      You also didn't get the memo on refrigeration, on which point any Swedish TED talk would inform you that electrification (primarily due to electrification bringing refrigeration) commonly leads to the greatest of all large bumps in human health and life expectancy.

      Dried food hasn't been a viable staple since humanity invented the bottom billion.

      As for significant gadgets, I'll throw in a vote for the sounding weight, which permitted the skillful Phoenicians to actually spread their fancy alphabet.

      This tool was bell shaped, made from stone or lead, with tallow inside attached to a very long rope. When out to sea, sailors could lower the sounding weight in order to determine how deep the waters were, and therefore estimate how far they were from land.

      Also, the tallow picked up sediments from the bottom which expert sailors could examine to determine exactly where they were.

    27. Re:Thanks! by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I am often moved, as the children roll their eyes, and as I reach into the freezer for ice cubes, to mention that humankind's greatest achievement is this machine in front of me. I can get ice in my gin and tonic whenever I want, and if civilisation is signified by anything, it's by that.

      Cheers.

    28. Re:Thanks! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      See also Vikings and their dried fish technology! Not to mention "Kingsbread" which is still made and possibly at a supermarket or deli near you.

    29. Re:Thanks! by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Dried food hasn't been a viable staple since humanity invented the bottom billion.

      What? Ever heard of wheat? Rice? World trade in wheat is greater than for all other crops combined. Rice is a large staple too. Wheat, rice, barley, corn (maize) are typically consumed like : dried state, which is then made wet again - generally while cooking them.

      This world is living on dried food for a long time.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    30. Re:Thanks! by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Pneumatic starting is actually pretty common for large diesel engines.

    31. Re:Thanks! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The still, then.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    32. Re:Thanks! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Whose modern white collar society? In northern europe air con is hardly essential and a most homes and the majority of offices still don't have it yet somehow we just struggle on.

    33. Re:Thanks! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong, but I believe that the earliest known examples of refrigeration are evaporation jars in the Indus Valley around 3000BC. The basic principle is the same as a modern refrigerator (coolant expands, cools), but without the closed loop so you needed to keep topping up the water to keep them chilled.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    34. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The electric motor is not strictly necessary. Automotive air conditioners rely on power taken from the crankshaft to turn the compressor.

      It probably has never been built, but it should be possible to build pneumatic-start into a mechanical-injected diesel truck, with a full-time, clutchless, belt-driven AC compressor, and with a belt and shaft-driven cabin fan, with a belt-driven compressor to recharge the compressed-air tank to drive the starter.

      Obviously there isn't a benefit in doing this, electrical technology is ubiquitous enough to where we generally can get away without having to go nuts to avoid it, but we could if we really, really wanted to.

      Air start is used on emergency black-start diesels, it's quite common in the utilities industry.

    35. Re:Thanks! by ancient_nerd · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but refrigeration is possible with no electricity and no moving parts, using a heat source (e.g. gas flame) instead. Look up "Absorption Refrigerator" on Wikipedia.

    36. Re:Thanks! by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking. But alcohol actually did contribute a good deal to modern civilization. Beer and wine allowed man to not be perpetually sick, and occasionally dying, from waterborne illness. Rum made routine long-duration ocean voyages possible; leading to trans-oceanic trade and colonization and, eventually, to the British Empire.

      You can not survive drinking just alcohol. Sure, alcohol doesn't have the waterborne illness but you would dehydrate in days if all you drank was beer and rum. So no, alcohol didn't allow for long duration ocean voyages or keep people from being perpetually sick.

    37. Re:Thanks! by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Alcohol. Beer and wine allowed the common man to breed without judgement...

      like the other mammals.

      While beer is the harbinger of civilisation, it isn't a "gadget".

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    38. Re:Thanks! by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Or the washing machine. Big contributor for allowing women to enter the workplace.

    39. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A refrigerator makes it so you can eat and your vaccines reach you.

      An air conditioner only allows you to live in an unsuitable home built in an unsuitable location.

      Next appliance please.

    40. Re:Thanks! by TWX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's common, but it's not common to have no electrical system whatsoever. I'm talking a vehicle with no alternator, no generator, no battery, no wiring, no lights.

      Given that lights are required and DOT-rated lights are all electrical there will always be an electrical system on a truck, for what it's worth. Hence why we use electric-powered pulley clutches and fans and stuff.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    41. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you dry, smoke, and salt that apostrophe you put into that possessive pronoun? it's means it is.

    42. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The electric motor is not strictly necessary. Automotive air conditioners rely on power taken from the crankshaft to turn the compressor.

      It probably has never been built, but it should be possible to build pneumatic-start into a mechanical-injected diesel truck, with a full-time, clutchless, belt-driven AC compressor, and with a belt and shaft-driven cabin fan, with a belt-driven compressor to recharge the compressed-air tank to drive the starter.

      Obviously there isn't a benefit in doing this, electrical technology is ubiquitous enough to where we generally can get away without having to go nuts to avoid it, but we could if we really, really wanted to.

      It's been built and is in service. Here in the US at least, there are tractor-trailer trucks whose engine is started by an air motor instead of a battery-driven starter.
      Since the truck has a large air tank for operating the braking system, there's a ready supply of compressed air to use.
      http://www.ingersollrandproducts.com/am-en/products/air-starters/vane-starters/ss100-small-engine-air-starter

      I don't know if the diesel powered refrigeration systems on temperature-controlled trailers are electric start or air, but it appears they could be configured that way. Since those motors are so small, I'm guessing those are electric start.

    43. Re:Thanks! by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      The electric motor is not strictly necessary. Automotive air conditioners rely on power taken from the crankshaft to turn the compressor. It probably has never been built, but it should be possible to build pneumatic-start into a mechanical-injected diesel truck, with a full-time, clutchless, belt-driven AC compressor, and with a belt and shaft-driven cabin fan, with a belt-driven compressor to recharge the compressed-air tank to drive the starter. Obviously there isn't a benefit in doing this, electrical technology is ubiquitous enough to where we generally can get away without having to go nuts to avoid it, but we could if we really, really wanted to.

      Oh heck, you don't need any kind of motor as long as you have a source of energy. You can use a flame, believe it or not. Popular in RVs and remote cabins. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    44. Re:Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many marine diesels use pneumatic starters (or hydraulic motor driven by pneumatic pressure in the accumulator) since an electrical drive would have to be massive to turn engines that huge.

      Since an IC engine is a compressor already, it would be simpler to exhaust the piston compressed gas to a tank via (2nd) exhaust valve and not combust it for power. Or you could have some pistons designed just for that task and others for firing pistons to drive the machine. We already combust the air as it's compressed continuously (gas turbine). I think it would be more interesting to vent the compressed air to the drive wheel and combust it there, eliminating the friction losses of driveshafts and CV / U joints.

      I would think one of the problems with electrically driving a compressor would be that resistance increases as temperature increases. The impellor is in direct contact with the compressed gas (pre intercooler) and the drive motor, so some complexity would have to be added to rearrange that. I think some people have done things like this already (no link, but I believe a turbocharger with a supercapacitor driven electrical motor and a freewheel-clutch to overcome turbo lag has been used in some F1 cars.)

  3. Zune. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zune.

    1. Re:Zune. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      For that answer, you deserve one

  4. That's an easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sword

  5. Easy by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Air conditioning. Made possible the industrialization of the south, and the popularity of Arizona for retirees, so basically A/C has triggered mass migrations of people to hotter climates, with an accompanying huge energy cost. Also made possible modern architecture, which is basically huge glass greenhouses with no opening windows -- try working in something like that without A/C!!!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The water spout is more so, while AC only helps bring you to warm climates, easy access to potable water makes you able to live almost anywhere on the surface (within reason)

    2. Re:Easy by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      >> mass migrations of people to hotter climates, with an accompanying huge energy cost

      I'll remember that next January while I'm watering the roses listening to the warnings of ice storms in the northeast.

      -A Phoenician

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    3. Re:Easy by swm · · Score: 4, Informative

      with an accompanying huge energy cost

      Actually, no.
      Air conditioning the desert seems extravagant, but it needs less energy than heating in northern climes.

    4. Re:Easy by Holi · · Score: 2

      i would say the refrigerator over AC.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:Easy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A/C set us back a long way. We already had ways to manage temperature in buildings, we just wanted inefficient architecture (like the greenhouse buildings you describe) and A/C compensates. A/C also has a number of down-sides compared to passive cooling, like the chill factor if you are too near to it, and of course the running cost.

      Refrigeration for food, now that was a big step forwards.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. influential gadgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) handguns
    2) 35mm camera

  7. The fleshlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if you'll excuse me...

  8. The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The wheel would have to be the most influential gadget of all time. Certainly more influential than some phone.

    1. Re:The wheel by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Yes, the wheel. Or maybe the pointy stick.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:The wheel by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. The 4 most influential gadgets have been:

      * Wheel
      * Gun
      * Printing Press
      * Computer

      How would one even begin to quantify "how much" influence they have had though??

    3. Re:The wheel by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Yes, the wheel. Or maybe the pointy stick.

      I never did find out how to defend myself from a pointy stick.

      Whoa!! Look out for that pineapple.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:The wheel by xevioso · · Score: 2

      I don't think the wheel counts as a gadget. There's a fine line between a gadget and a tool, and the wheel is the latter, just like a hammer.

      This list is one of SPECIFIC versions of objects that had already existed, but which were the best examples of their class; the Walkman and the iPhone were just very good examples of gadgets that had existed in one form or another already.

    5. Re:The wheel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Personally, I'd exclude the Simple Machines from the category of "gadget". They may have been more influential, but aren't "gadgets". The list given seems slanted towards "electronic gadget".

    6. Re:The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the can opener?
      Made canning food practical, hence ability to store food, without refrigeration (which needs power, which needs...)

    7. Re:The wheel by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. The 4 most influential gadgets have been:

      * Wheel
      * Gun
      * Printing Press
      * Computer

      I'd like to note the irony of a magazine not mentioning the printing press anywhere on their list.

      They would look far less stupid if they had simply limited the list to the last 50 years (which is where almost all their items come from).

    8. Re:The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd add in the Clock. It affects everything today. I'd say that its importance will supercede even the printing press as more books go digital. The clock will always be around.

    9. Re:The wheel by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the can opener was not terribly far behind a practical canning process. Arguably they are the same technology.

      Similarly, the iPhone is the culmination of a lot of other technologies - it would have been a lot less compelling without a pervasive data network and a compact, powerful battery. An iPhone all by itself is a rather sad technology, indeed.

      I'm going to vote for the compass. It's useful even without a giant supporting infrastructure, though it admittedly aided shipping the most.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:The wheel by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I don't mean to get all semantic, but a printing press is not exactly a "gadget"...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:The wheel by xevioso · · Score: 1

      That's because that is what people think of when someone says gadget. It's not just any invention or tool, its an electronic one.

      If you think a wheel is a gadget, can you name a specific wheel brand that was influential? After all, the iPhone is #1 on the list, even thought here were other smartphones before and after...

    12. Re:The wheel by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flint, that started fire. Best gadget ever. Also the fire starting kit made of a couple of sticks and piece of string.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    13. Re: The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The maritime chronometer

    14. Re:The wheel by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The digital clock, which led to the digital watch, which Douglas Adams recognized as the pinnacle of human achievement.

    15. Re:The wheel by Nethead · · Score: 2

      The indoor toilet would be my choice. It even takes care of some of the issues of not having refrigeration. I think you could call John Crapper's invention a gadget.

      Plumbing (sanitation) and refrigeration are my two main things I'm thankful for having been born in this era. To think it took the earth 4.5Gy to come up with hot showers and cold beer. Add electricity into the mix and we're golden-age.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    16. Re:The wheel by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      At the time (of peak use), a sextant would be considered a "gadget" (or equivalent period word). You are using the fact that "gadget" is a new word to influence the age of the items selected.

      If you think a wheel is a gadget, can you name a specific wheel brand that was influential?

      I can't think of a specific brand of TV that was influential, and that's #2 on the list, so I'm confused how that's a requirement for "gadget", also, generally "gadget" means something small enough it can be casually carried, like a sextant, binoculars, gun, iPhone, and other personal object. TV doesn't seem to fit the definition of "gadget" unless you broaden the definition of "gadget" to include almost anything, in which case phone (without the "i") would be much more influential. Though the Time article TFA was based on indicates it's a list of the most important tech that can be identified by maker, not device. So it's a single product, not "gadget".

      The wording in TFA doesn't agree with the original article, but is an Apple fan blog focusing on the #1 spot and making it sound more important and sweeping. And the commenters here haven't read TFA, let alone TOA (the original article).

    17. Re:The wheel by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      If you think a wheel is a gadget, can you name a specific wheel brand that was influential?

      Goodyear. First vulcanized tire. Founded by the inventor of vulcanization.

      *mic drop*

    18. Re:The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The 4 most influential gadgets have been:

      * Wheel
      * Gun
      * Printing Press
      * Computer

      How would one even begin to quantify "how much" influence they have had though??

      Don't forget the laser, devices using those things are EVERYWHERE.

    19. Re:The wheel by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Eponymous, but not contemporary. Founded by Frank Seiberling.

    20. Re:The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice list... But I would put fire at the top.

      Without fire you don't get gun, printing press , or computer.

      And without the tools made by fire, the wheel is rather difficult to make.

    21. Re:The wheel by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's a good point.

      Technically fire isn't "gadget", but I guess "torch" qualifies. :-)

    22. Re:The wheel by blkmajik · · Score: 1

      You are so close replace the computer with a magnet and you got yourself a list

    23. Re:The wheel by postglock · · Score: 2

      * Wheel

      I'd replace that with the second wheel.

    24. Re:The wheel by narcc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rather than go with "most influential" and to avoid a lot of bickering over "gadget" (by conforming to the most cited criteria here) I'll offer a few items more influential than the iPhone, in no particular order:

      • The walkman
      • The transistor radio
      • The pocket watch
      • The slide rule
      • The pocket calculator
      • The mobile phone
      • The consumer GPS receiver
      • The microwave oven

      I could easily go on. The point, of course, is that the iPhone (or any specific smartphone) shouldn't even make the top 10.

    25. Re:The wheel by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the can opener was not terribly far behind a practical canning process

      Not exactly:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Can_opener

    26. Re:The wheel by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Flint, that started fire. Best gadget ever. Also the fire starting kit made of a couple of sticks and piece of string.

      String! We would have loved to have string!

      Seriously three sticks and a leather thong start the fire if you want to get all boy scout about it.
      From the link: http://www.artofmanliness.com/...
      "When you see a good amount of smoke, stop and look at the punk"

      Two sticks and a lot of blisters on the hands apparently works but not for me.

    27. Re:The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the hand axe. Usually, but not always, flint. The gadget that allowed us to skin all those mammoths.

    28. Re:The Wheel by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I'd go back before that, the first stone cutting tool which started the evolutionary path away from what your body can do alone to what body, mind, and tools can do

    29. Re:The wheel by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but... well, your Wikipedia link makes my point for me, linking to Matt Ridley's acticle.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    30. Re:The wheel by Forgefather · · Score: 1

      "canning" existed for years before the can opener by using jars and pickling the food that you wanted to preserve.

      --
      "There are lies, there are damn lies, and there are statistics"
    31. Re:The wheel by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Astrolabe.

    32. Re:The wheel by sootman · · Score: 1

      I'd put "refrigeration" above "computer". Being able to keep food and medicine cool and safe has had a HUGE impact on health and life expectancy.

      And if you're going to include "wheel", you may as well include lever, inclined plane, and the rest.

      Just as we have wonders of the ancient and modern worlds, I'd say gadgets should be broken into groups. And yes, I heard Comic Book Guy's voice in my head as I typed that. Ugh.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    33. Re:The wheel by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      That's a dam good list.

      If you don't mind I'm going to augment it with all the other great suggestions other people have mentioned.

      My Top 33 list would be:

      * flint and/or torch
      * bow + arrow
      * second wheel + axle (Thx postglock!)
      * knife
      * lantern + kerosene
      * granary
      * lever
      * inclined plane
      * forge / anvil (so you can make swords)
      * shovel / pick-axe
      * soap
      * plow
      * compass
      * clock and/or pocket watch
      * gun
      * dynamite
      * printing press, or for the semantic nazis, the Apple Laserwriter printer (which started DeskTop Publishing)
      * gas motor
      * electric motor
      * light bulb
      * medical syringe
      * pocket watch
      * bicycle
      * car
      * slide rule
      * refrigerator
      * television
      * transistor radio
      * walkman
      * CD player
      * computer
      * mobile phone
      * gps receiver

    34. Re:The wheel by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      When my wife asked her great-grandfather, he said "the light bulb". I'd say that's worth including.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re:The wheel by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I mostly knew about it from the cans found with the remains of the Franklin expedition - food that kept for over a century in cans that had to be opened with a hammer and chisel. Animal testing was used but the dog really liked the veal :)

    36. Re:The wheel by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, now you've sent me on a Wikipedia journey to finish out the night :)

      I like this bit:
      "They concluded that the men whose graves had been found on Beechey Island most likely died of pneumonia and perhaps tuberculosis and that lead poisoning may have worsened their health, owing to badly soldered cans held in the ships' food stores. However, it was later suggested that the source of this lead may not have been tinned food, but the distilled water systems fitted to the expedition’s ships."

      Either way, they were dealing with what they thought to be some pretty decent technology at the time...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re:The wheel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Yes, the wheel. Or maybe the pointy stick.

      The pointy stick is just an extension of the concept of poking somebody.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    38. Re:The wheel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Yes, the wheel. Or maybe the pointy stick.

      I never did find out how to defend myself from a pointy stick.

      Whoa!! Look out for that pineapple.

      Don't forget the poo stick, the weapon against which our technology has the fewest defenses.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    39. Re:The wheel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      How about the can opener? Made canning food practical, hence ability to store food, without refrigeration (which needs power, which needs...)

      Originally, the "canning" process was developed in France around 1800, to provision Napoleon's army, and used wide mouth bottles and corks. Tin cans came along a few years later; but.... can openers didn't arrive until the 1850s. Must have made a lot of hungry people happy.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    40. Re:The wheel by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Flint, that started fire. Best gadget ever. Also the fire starting kit made of a couple of sticks and piece of string.

      aha, a subset of my entry: the big rock for smashing things. the mother of all technology. why do dolphins have no technology despite their supposed brains? No rocks to smash things with.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    41. Re:The wheel by dbIII · · Score: 1

      As for decent technology, one of the Franklin's ships is mostly intact on the sea bottom and was imaged with side scan sonar last year with results so good that it was obviously the correct ship even to a layman like me just comparing it to a painting of the ship. The water is deep enough and cold enough that it hasn't broken up.

    42. Re:The wheel by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      HA-HA ! That's priceless. Hadn't seen that one before.

      --
      Only Cowards Censor

  9. Atom by captboom52 · · Score: 1

    The original Gadget the atomic bomb

  10. Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey Slashdotters!

    Which is the most influential letter in the alphabet of all time? Not just the one that's had the most impact through the years, but the letter whose combination of style, utility, and inspiration will take us through the early part of the 21st century and beyond!

    My pick? You might think it's going to be a vowel, but I'm going to surprise "u" and go with... "C". A little "controversial", maybe, but hey, I think it's a "classy" "choice"!

    Well, now you know my pick. What's yours?!! And don't forget to tell us "y"!

    1. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? C is redundant and can be replaced by a K or an S. Its only practical use is in the digraph 'ch'.

    2. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      So the K in KDE stands for "Krap" after all?

    3. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Exactly. C is redundant, just like G is, which can often be replaced by J. Or the letter E, which can easily be replaced by Y.

    4. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      And "x" can generally be replaced by "k", or sometimes "z".

      G is, which can often be replaced by J. Or the letter E, which can easily be replaced by Y.

      So Gigantic would be what? Jijjntic? Jieantic? How would someone spell gigantic without "g" There's on "juh" g in there and on "guh" g in there.

    5. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by xevioso · · Score: 1

      I said often...You can write Jigantic and it sounds the same (and is less confusing) than Gigantic.

    6. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But it still has a "g" in there, so "g" can't be replaced in gigantic. The first, yes, but the second, no. So "g" would be a required letter. "j" is one of the most recent additions to the language. It looks like "i" because that's what it derived from.

    7. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would tell you, but unicode ...

    8. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G and J should both exist, and be used for their different sounds. G should be used as in "graphic" and J as in "Jack". So gigantic would be jigantic.

      Q is redundant. Replace with KW or K depending on the sound. Kwik, kwasar, kwark.

    9. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by transami · · Score: 2

      But C is for Cookie.

      --
      :T:R:A:N:S:
    10. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go with "F", followed by "U"...

    11. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      The other way around, you can get by without a K, because C serves this purpose.
      Q can be replaced with CW.
      X can go, as ecks or Z does the job, (or ecs if you've already lost the K).
      J can be served by G, and Z can be replaced with TS.
      So that's all the high scoring scrabble letters made obsolete.

    12. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's good enough for me.

    13. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the most important letter. The real question is "what is the most important integer?" My 6 year old granddaughter is partial to "11," but I'm going to go with "0."

      What is yours?

  11. Can opener/bottle opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Preserved food revolutionized warfare and eventually made life better for civilians as well

  12. Most influential gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The HP-35, the worlds first scientific pocket calculator.

  13. List by 20-somethings? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I admire the quality and intentions of the iPhone, I don't see it as being that important. People were texting, calling, and (gasp!) yes, even browsing the web before an iPhone ever showed up. The locked-in experience of the time was vastly inferior to what the iPhone brought to the game, which is of course the main reason that it did so well. But, without the iPhone, the smartphone market would still have developed, and people still would be carrying tiny but powerful little computers in their pockets.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
    1. Re:List by 20-somethings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all the iphones in the world disappeared, it would be like 2006 again, which wasn't really that different. Life would go on. If all the, say, dental drills disappeared, it would be a different story.

    2. Re:List by 20-somethings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Palm Treo pre-dated the original iPhone AND it could do video recording and everything else the original iPhone could. The iPhone had a bigger screen, however, and the OS producer didn't stop supporting it.

    3. Re:List by 20-somethings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really went out of your way to see what wasn't there, didn't you? Don't let your prejudices stand in the way or anything but...

      They're saying the smart phone in not so many words. You knew that but you just needed to take a cheap shot at Apple. That's the reason you'll never be taken too seriously outside of the Slashdork circles.

  14. The printing press by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the gun

    Seems to me that the printing press has probably brought down more governments and effected more change that the gun. Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

    1. Re:The printing press by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      But no gadget has brought as many click-throughs to a dying publisher as the iPhone.

    2. Re:The printing press by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      I vote for the flint firestarter over the iPhone.

    3. Re:The printing press by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      ...and I would still argue that this is the printing press. Part of the reason I would say that it is far more influential than the iPhone is that it has been around for longer which has given it more of a chance to influence society.

    4. Re:The printing press by kenj123 · · Score: 2

      I agree with printing press. I think the modern era began with the printing press. it was the basis of both the Reformation and Scientific revolution. Before the printing press, ideas circulated so slowly it was looked a more as reference material. After the printing press ideas spread so quickly that ideas became a collaborative effort, almost a conversation between people that never met.

    5. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does a printing press count as a "gadget"? It's rather large, more likely to be classified as a "contraption".

    6. Re:The printing press by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Even their reasoning for choosing the iPhone is faulty.

      Before the iPhone there was the Palm. While Palm OS was a bit funky, some of the later (still pre-iPhone) devices like the Tungsten were definitely full-blown pocket computers. You could get apps for them, read and write MS Office documents, spreadsheets, and databases, and even play Bejeweled 2 in high-res. full color with good sound. And browse the Internet.

      Before the Palm was the HP programmable calculator. The HP 28S was definitely a general-purpose pocket computer, back in the late 80s. I/O was a bit of a problem... I was only keyboard and O was only screen or portable printer... but it was definitely a computer and I wrote many programs for it. The language is/was a lot like Forth. It had a multi-line alphanumeric screen and fit in your shirt pocket.

      I understand them liking the iPhone, but it was nowhere near the first viable pocket computer. Not even the first good one.

    7. Re:The printing press by nukenerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People voting the iPhone in this reminds me of a similar poll for the worst film of all time. They came up with ones like "The War of the Worlds" (Tom Cruise version), "Terminator", "Forest Gump" etc. In other words they voted for films they had seen recently and did not happen to like themselves. They showed their complete ignorance of just how bad films can really be, such as "Plan 9 from Outer Space", "Manos, the Hands of Fate", and "The attack of the 50 foot Woman". These iFans have got their noses too close to their little screens.

    8. Re:The printing press by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I understand them liking the iPhone, but it was nowhere near the first viable pocket computer. Not even the first good one.

      Their rationale was that it was the first successful pocket computer (i.e. in the pockets of millions), but even that is somewhat debatable. A lot of the success of the iPhone came from launching it just at the time when the technology was ready. Capacitive touch screens made a huge difference to the UI (being able to use your fingers and not just a stylus). Screens big enough and processors fast enough that you could run a real web browser (not WAP crap) and have it actually be useful made a big difference (I had a Nokia N80 that had a real WebKit-powered web browser, but having to scroll around the page with a tiny screen meant that it wasn't that useful). Newer WiFi chipsets that meant that you could leave WiFi on all of the time meant that you could actually use the device as a computer even when data tariffs are insanely expensive. Cheap flash (and Apple gets some credit here by using the iPods to drive up the demand for flash enough to make it cheap) meant that you could store a reasonable amount of music on the device and use it to replace a separate music player.

      The iPhone came out just one year after the N80, and at a similar price. The difference between the two was huge. The iPhone wasn't unique in that regard - several other manufacturers had similar devices out at around the same time - but the combination of technology from further up the supply chain made phones from that generation very different from earlier devices.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading that the three greatest inventions of the human race are:
      (1) Fire; (2) Wheel; and (3) Transistor.

    10. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans didn't invent fire.

    11. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace fire with the knife

    12. Re:The printing press by KGIII · · Score: 2

      > These iFans have got their noses too close to their little screens.

      They're looking to see if they can still pick out individual pixels.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    13. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here 'fire' stands for the ability to produce a fire.

    14. Re:The printing press by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I understand them liking the iPhone, but it was nowhere near the first viable pocket computer. Not even the first good one.

      The iphone was really about being in the right place at the right time. Same with the ipad. What caused the iphone and ipad to take off was they finally reached the feature set, price point, and critical mass to take off. Back in the late 90s I dreamed about having a "webpad". There were several companies that tried to do it but the prices were too high and the technology just wasn't there yet. You could say that apple finally "got it right" but I think it was more that things like bluetooth, wifi, high res screens, processor power, etc.. finally existed and at the right price to make it work. This could be said about many other inventions like the PC, the automobile, the internet, or drones. It takes a certain combination of technology and price points to get something to take off.

    15. Re:The printing press by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Funny how you ignore the Apple Newton - without which Palm wouldn't exist. Quite remarkable for a rant about selective reasoning.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    16. Re:The printing press by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Although the gun and the printing press are both inventions that dramatically changed the world, they probably don't meet Time's definition of a tech gadget. If I were going to choose a gun to represent the category I would go with a handgun rather than a rifle; it feels more gadget-like. Perhaps the iconic Colt .45: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      They did include the HP DeskJet printer as an example of the kind of personal printer that brought the power of the printing press to the masses. I might have chosen the HP LaserJet or the Apple Laserwriter, both of which preceded the DeskJet by a bit, as better examples. I'm guessing that Time chose the DeskJet because of its greater affordability, and because inkjet printing is the technology that fully democratized personal printing.

    17. Re:The printing press by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      The original Palm Pilot did make the list, though not at #1. It was influential, but ultimately was a device and a category of devices that wasn't quite good enough to achieve the kind of mass acceptance that the smartphone has.

      And no, the iPhone is not the first smartphone. Various Palm and Windows-based devices, the BlackBerry, and Nokia's Symbian phones preceded it. But it was the first one to be accepted by more people and used as a smartphone by more than just a small tech-oriented elite. Lots of Symbian devices were sold but most of them weren't really used in a way that we would recognize as smartphone use; they had either no apps installed or a handful of lightly-used ones at most. Palm devices were used in a more smartphone way, but not by enough people.

    18. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. The sword has brought down the most amount of governments. As far as killing efficiency, a knife manages to kill more people than a gun, as East Asian individuals with mental breakdown have been proving for the past decade or two.
      When someone wants to kill, they will find a way to kill whether you like it or not. The only difference between them picking a gun or a close combat weapons is that one enables them to be more confident, while the other forces them to be more cautious and privy towards doing things quietly and with a sneaky attitude.

    19. Re:The printing press by gmiller123456 · · Score: 2

      Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      Pointing a gun at someone can be very influential.

    20. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, (3) electricity.

    21. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of liked the wheel myself. Maybe the horse collar.

    22. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People overlook the Apple Newton for a reason: It was junk and an embarrassment to Apple. It should never have been released. Only ahistorical folks cite iAnything.

      The desktop computer is the most influential gadget of modern times; the printing press is probably the all time most influential (there are many other contenders).

    23. Re: The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (4) integrated circuit

    24. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that the printing press has probably brought down more governments and effected more change that the gun. Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

      A dubious assumption. Human beings killed each other in huge numbers long before there were guns. Certainly the Mongols didn't need guns for mass murder: go look up Tamerlane.

      Even once guns were invented, they didn't do most of the killing in war throughout history: disease did, followed by starvation.

      In many cases, guns provided a degree of equalization, allowing irregular forces to defeat military units enforcing unpopular policies (e.g. the Battle of Concord in the American Revolution).

      Even in relatively modern times (e.g. WW2), handguns didn't cause the most casualties in land combat, artillery did (but perhaps you lump that into the category of 'gun').

      Then there the question of bombers. As people found out repeatedly in the 20th century (through at least Vietnam), one will have a lot of trouble stopping a bomber without guns. In such cases, the guns actually reduce the casualties: trading one bomber crew for hundreds of civilian lives is a pretty good trade. Even better if you can take out the bomber crew before they get in their plane (an option that won't be available with robot weapons).

      It's far better to have the guns then not have them.

    25. Re:The printing press by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      People voting the iPhone in this reminds me of a similar poll for the worst film of all time. They came up with ones like "The War of the Worlds" (Tom Cruise version), "Terminator", "Forest Gump" etc. In other words they voted for films they had seen recently and did not happen to like themselves. They showed their complete ignorance of just how bad films can really be, such as "Plan 9 from Outer Space", "Manos, the Hands of Fate", and "The attack of the 50 foot Woman". These iFans have got their noses too close to their little screens.

      Not even close.
      http://www.vulture.com/2013/06/the-room-10th-anniversary-history.html
      https://youtu.be/w59fZNDTMAg

      "Oh hai, Lisa"

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    26. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will say it has to be the diamond encrusted onyx length of a freshly used, steaming, blood and faeces streaked anal plug.

    27. Re:The printing press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen "Manos, Hands of Fate" and, apart from the raw footage of Ted Cruz at home, it's the worst thing I've seen. OTOH, I haven't see Eegah, which has some claim to that as well.

      Some bad movies win on camp, such as "The Fearless Vampire Killers" and "Robot Monster."

    28. Re:The printing press by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Their rationale was that it was the first successful pocket computer (i.e. in the pockets of millions), but even that is somewhat debatable.

      It's not even really very debatable. The Palm was there first.

    29. Re:The printing press by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Funny how you ignore the Apple Newton - without which Palm wouldn't exist. Quite remarkable for a rant about selective reasoning.

      Funny how you accuse me of something I didn't do.

      I simply gave examples, to show that iPhone was definitely not first. I didn't claim Palm was the first. In fact I could not have, since I also mentioned a much earlier example.

      So I really don't know what the hell you're talking about.

    30. Re:The printing press by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      The original Palm Pilot did make the list, though not at #1. It was influential, but ultimately was a device and a category of devices that wasn't quite good enough to achieve the kind of mass acceptance that the smartphone has.

      Again, not quite true. Palm Tungsten was selling like hotcakes. It basically was a smartphone, without the phone part.

      But when real smartphones came out, it became almost instantly obsolete. Not because the Palm was really inferior in other ways. Hell, in those other ways it was a lot better than most smartphones: better and bigger screen, plenty of memory, and a very decent processor.

      The reason it became obsolete was pretty much because it wasn't a phone too. People didn't want to carry 2 devices around.

      The Palm Treo (smartphone) did not do very well because it sacrificed all those other things that made Palm stand out. Like the really nice, big color screen.

  15. Glock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glock

  16. Inspector Gadget by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although in terms of influence, Penny and her pet dog did most of the work.

    1. Re:Inspector Gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the theory that Inspector Gadget is an android who replaced the real inspector... who is now Dr. Claw.

  17. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Utter bullshit

  18. Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadget" by gtwrek · · Score: 2

    The two most influential inventions that affected more people (for the positive), by far, would be indoor plumbing, and vaccines. Could argue either way which one's first.

    Don't know if those are "gadgets"...

  19. Influencial Gadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Inspector Gadget.

  20. My $0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the battery, which makes all the other portable gadgets possible.

  21. Firearms and refrigerators by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Firearms have forever changed both warfare and personal security. You can say, bow and arrow had a similarly dramatic effect — Spartans captured by Athenians 2500 years ago complained bitterly, that reed (from which arrows were made) does not distinguish between the brave and the cowards. But arrows weren't useful against fortifications and bow was not a good short-range weapon.

    Now, refrigerators have dramatically altered the way we buy and prepare food... I'd nominate them if only because they tend to be underappreciated these days.

    Railroads, airlines, personal cars — not sure, if you can call them "gadgets". Telegraph and telephone — sure!

    And then cellular phone, followed by "smart" phone. But I think, telephones were more revolutionary than these next stages.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  22. Re:Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadg by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    Plastics would have to be up there as well.

  23. Not even joking by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    The pointy stick. Longest record of use by humanity and its predecessors (Myrs). Useful as both weapon and tool. Sharp sticks and the intelligence to use them (and later, fire) are, to a first approximation, the reason we are even a thing on this rock.

    But, yeah, iPhones and drones though....

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Not even joking by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought you meant the other "pointy stick". That other one is highly influential, I can assure you. It makes guys do really foolish things, and possibly causes most wars.

  24. "Smartphone" is what an iPhone actually is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the phrase iPhone changed how we work. Should have been
    Smartphones changed our lives since it was not long after apple showcased their version that the androids were cut loose.
      Let's thank them but not bow down rebel.

    1. Re: "Smartphone" is what an iPhone actually is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFTER the iPhone showed them how? Or before?

  25. Refrigerators and Transistors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh

  26. I asked my wife... by phayes · · Score: 1

    She said it's the Vibrator...

    --
    Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    1. Re:I asked my wife... by xevioso · · Score: 1

      That one is #10. No joke.

    2. Re:I asked my wife... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      It's plumb crazy no one ever gives a nod to the battery that made it all possible.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re: I asked my wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Battery? Real vibrators sport little diesel engines. Ask any dyke.

    4. Re:I asked my wife... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I asked my wife... She said it's the Vibrator...

      It made the top ten, beating out the VCR, the typewriter, the video game console, the personal computer, the pager, and the pocket calculator.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:I asked my wife... by phayes · · Score: 1

      Not disagreeing but If you look into the history of vibrators, they were plugged in versions sold to doctors & used for treating hysteresis in women by "artificially provoking a crisis". Yup, back then women could go see the family doctor to get off if hubby didn't have a clue.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  27. Toilet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try going to the little outbuilding at 2am. You'll agree.

    1. Re:Toilet by croftj · · Score: 1

      I see I'm not the only one to think this way.

      --
      -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
  28. Indoor Plumbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Somehow I've gotten by without an iphone7 so far.

    Indoor plumbing however changed my life.

  29. Re:Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  30. Oh god. List by idiots by Harlequin80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel like my brain just got dumber reading that list. The Wii? Fit bit? Oculus rift? Nest Thermostat? Roku Netflixs?

    None of those things should even make the top 10,000 let alone the top 50. Initially I thought they were limiting it to post 1970s stuff and then they throw in an 1850s record player.

    1. Re: Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the Time writers are being delusional, you should check out the article they wrote on this on an Apple fanboy website.

      http://iphone.appleinsider.com/articles/16/05/03/apples-iphone-is-most-influential-gadget-ever-says-time

      Just skip to the comments like a good slashdotter. They're absolutely priceless.

  31. PR stunt by krkhan · · Score: 2

    This is pointless click-bait, made even more obvious by putting iPhone on the top. Why isn't the QWERTY keyboard the most influential gadget of all time? The beloved iPhones still use QWERTY, no? Why isn't telephone itself at the top? That's what connected the world, no? How about telegram, the precursor to both internet and telephone? "Gadget" and "most influential" are both loosely defined terms. The sole purpose of this article was to somehow get iPhone to the top.

    1. Re:PR stunt by FrankSchwab · · Score: 2

      Remarkably, no airplane made the list. If there's one thing that's made the world smaller and influenced everyone's life, it's been cheap air travel.
      I'm guessing they put this list together in 45 minutes one day after drinking at lunch.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    2. Re: PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The QWERTY keyboard was designed to SLOW DOWN typing. Just a reminder, in case you forgot.

    3. Re: PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't.

    4. Re:PR stunt by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Remarkably, no airplane made the list.

      Errr. I'm not sure the airplane can really be considered a "gadget".

      If that's the case then we might as well say that aircraft carriers were the most influential "gadget".

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re: PR stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: the telegraph, nerds like Thomas Edison back in the day hung around the telegraph infrastructure. That was where it was at for nerds in the beginning times.

  32. Re:Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadg by flopsquad · · Score: 1

    I just want to say one word to you. Just one word.

    Are you listening?


    Plastics.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  33. Re:Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words. Artificial Refrigeration. THAT has been the most influential gadgetry of all time. Before refrigeration much of our time was spent preserving food for lean times. Indoor plumbing would probably be second for sure.

  34. The Toilet!! by croftj · · Score: 1

    Reduced disease and overall made our communities (at least those that have them) much better places to live. Not to mention, I can poop in the comfort and warmth of my home without is smelling!

    -joe

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
    1. Re:The Toilet!! by argee · · Score: 1

      Toilets in general, but specific brand? Patented by T. John Crapper in the 1800's, his patents and manufacturing dominated 19th Century
      England, Europe and the U.S. At a time when a man made $30-$50 a month in wages, his device netted him MILLIONS. Until the 20th
      Century, and to a large extent today, the Paper Industry and the Deforestation so common today is due to Toilet Paper.

    2. Re:The Toilet!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fell for it. Hehe...
      Wallace Reyburn wrote a Hoax called "Flushed With Pride", that credited Thomas Crapper with the invention of the Flush Toilet. Crapper actually did invent a few things to do with plumbing, but the Flush Toilet had already been around for a couple of Centuries.
      It was a terrific Hoax. None other than Martin Gardner of Scientific American participated in it, in the April 1, 1975 issue. (That should have been a clue...)

      In fact, Crapper was a lousy businessman, and his small company folded, leaving behind all sorts of local-to-London Manhole Covers, Lavatories, and Ballcocks bearing his name "Crapper". That was his legacy.
      Note that "Going to the Crapper" and "Taking a Crap" are rooted in two entirely different unrelated words.
      Now that you know... don't tell anybody...

  35. Trinity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gadget that started the nuclear arms race and almost ended humanity.

    1. Re:Trinity by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      Came here to make the same comment. We would be living in a mostly pre-WWII world otherwise, not have gone to the moon and the iPhone would not have been invented.

      The test was of an implosion-design plutonium device, informally nicknamed "The Gadget", of the same design as the Fat Man bomb later detonated over Nagasaki, Japan, on August 9, 1945.

  36. The internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very useful to get rid of anybody. Unless you get the infamous "gatonet" in Brazil.

  37. Transistor radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd say it was the transistor radio.

  38. The pencil by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    and other non-electric writing devices. These enabled records and information to be reliably kept for many years and sent great distances.

    In too many surveys like this people only think about what is new/revolutionary in their lifetime and completely forget about what came before. Myopic!

  39. **piff** by transami · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everybody knows it's the TOWEL.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  40. Refrigirator by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    1. Your fridge. You don't have to cook every day, you can store food for longer periods of time, you don't need to throw away as much food. This also applies to storing other things (not just food).
    2. Sewing machine.
    3. Washing machine.

  41. The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0

    As much as I admire the quality and intentions of the iPhone, I don't see it as being that important. People were texting, calling, and (gasp!) yes, even browsing the web before an iPhone ever showed up. The locked-in experience of the time was vastly inferior to what the iPhone brought to the game, which is of course the main reason that it did so well. But, without the iPhone, the smartphone market would still have developed, and people still would be carrying tiny but powerful little computers in their pockets.

    Before the iPhone, people were lamenting several things about cell phones:

    1) They all had a keypad 0-9 display. You had all sorts of features, but you had to remember which keypad number activated speaker phone, and which number sent to voice mail, and so on.

    2) The carriers controlled the software with an iron fist. The industry was lamenting that it was impossible to write any programming for cell phones because you had to go through the carriers, who imposed an onerous process and only allowed applications they *thought* might sell well enough to be worth their effort. (And I remember specifically that Tetris was allowed on phones due to its popularity, and pretty-much nothing else.)

    When I heard that Apple was making a cell phone, my immediate thought was "well, they'll never get the carriers to accept it". I was rather *surprised* when Apple managed to get ATT on board as a carrier, and I think a lot of other people were as well.

    Then the iPhone came out and it had some features:

    1) The icons changed based on circumstance. The "speakerphone" function was an icon that was indicative of its function. You no longer had to remember which number to press. A lot of people don't understand how innovative this was at the time, for phones.

    2) You could download apps for all sorts of things, and you could write your own apps. This led to a wide spectrum of useful things, but it included some surprising apps such as one that identified bird species using the camera. Things that the carriers would *never* have thought of as useful or even interesting now suddenly became possible.

    3) The thing worked seamlessly. You could be listening to music and when a call came in it paused the music, put it into the background, and allowed you to talk for a bit. When you hung up the music continued from where it had left off.

    4) There were a bunch of other innovations too, such as the keypad expanding the key when you touched it when your finger covered the key. That made it *much* easier to use a small-display keypad.

    We don't see much to recommend the iPhones nowadays because everyone and their brother is making spartphones (including, for instance Microsoft), but when you compare them to what was available at the time, they really were quite the innovation.

    1. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry but PalmOS and even Windows Mobile did all of this way before the iPhone even hit the drawing board. There were even mobile phone versions in the the form of the Treo and Tungsten C.

      The only revolutionary thing about the iPhone is it broke out of the techie niche that previous devices had been trapped in and brought it mainstream, but I suspect the biggest reason for that is fashion rather than technical.

    2. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by ShogZilla · · Score: 1

      Not to be too picky, but initially (I was an early adopter, with the original iphone, within a very short time of its release) there wasn't the app support you describe. It had the apps it came with, and could access 'webapps' - javascript on webpages via bookmarks, more or less. There wasn't an app store, public sdk, etc. That all came later - at least several months, might've even been a hair over a year.

    3. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This - but further. The main thing the iphone did was make computing STUPID.

      iphone - even now, is a TERRIBLE computer. Try doing *anything* remotely interesting on the OS, you can't.

      You know how you can tell a person is computer illiterate when their desktop is just a smattering of random crap, shortcuts, and documents ? Guess what iphone did, it simply doesn't *allow* you to do that.

      All the intelligent people missed the boat because we're doing MORE interesting things. People talk about this "revolution" in mobile gaming - but every mobile game is just an incredibly dumbed down PC game that's been around for years.

      I guess it's cool to bring something to the masses. But revolutionary? Not sure selfies and angry birds is revolutionary. (oh, and pausing your music when you get a cool! HOLY SHIT)

    4. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      2) You could download apps for all sorts of things, and you could write your own apps.

      A lot of people forget, but you could NOT originally write 3rd party apps for the iPhone. Apple originally intended to write all the apps for it, and figured any 3rd party applications would be web-based. It was only after tremendous pressure did Jobs finally relent and open up the SDK to external developers. Any success you attribute to the original iPhone really can't have anything to do with 3rd party apps - although it certainly contributed to later successes.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by xevioso · · Score: 1

      This was true, but only for 6 months to a year I think. The rumor was the phone was coming out, but even before the iPhone came out they were under pressure, and started writing the SDK before it came out, so that about a year later you could start writing apps.

    6. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Before the iPhone, people were lamenting several things about cell phones:

      1) They all had ...

      I had an O2 XDA in 2004 that did most of the things a iPhone did, only much worse. It was a full screen touch screen, with WinCE, and ran apps and had internet. All Apple did was design all those features into slick highend package. Sure it was a generation shift, but it wasn't anything like refrigeration, or the wheel.

    7. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to have a few things backwards. The original iPhone was the only phone at the time which you could not buy without getting a plan with one specific mobile phone network in each country. It took a while and some legal proceedings before Apple was finally forced to sell it separately. It was also the only (or at least one of the few) smartphones that did not allow installing third-party applications.

      Furthermore, all mobile phones had menu buttons and directional buttons or something similar. I've never seen a mobile phone that required keypad numbers to access features. Additionally, before the iPhone, many smartphones had [QW|AZ]ERT[Y|Z] keyboards. The multi-touch interface popularised by the iPhone killed that off.

      Seemless music integration was already common for years when the iPhone came out. All multimedia phones as they were called in the day had it.

      The iPhone made smartphones more popular by making everything easy, smooth and well-integrated. It did not introduce any major features

    8. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The carriers controlled the software with an iron fist.

      That's a particularly US problem. I got my first mobile phone in 1997 and a pre-pay SIM. The phone was locked to the carrier, but they would unlock it for £10. I never bothered getting them to do this, because I stayed with them until the phone was worthless. Every subsequent phone that I've bought has been bought independently of the carrier. None of them have come with carrier-installed crapware, including the first one.

      You could download apps for all sorts of things, and you could write your own apps.

      My next three phones all ran Symbian, which came with C++ and J2ME SDKs and allowed you to run third-party apps. I even had a port of Doom on my N70. When the iPhone was released, the lack of third-party apps was one of the big regressions. The others were the lack of Bluetooth sync (amusingly, I got much better integration with OS X from my N80 - iSync could sync the calendar and address book wirelessly and I could dial the phone directly from AddressBook.app and get an on-screen notification of the caller on the laptop), no 3G support, and no SIP client (Symbian had one built in and integrated with the normal phone software, so I could make cheap VoIP calls when I was near WiFi).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Apple has a practice of telling you you can get along without features that they aren't ready to release yet. I'd say that was a large part of Jobs talking about how the iPhone could use web apps.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when the first generation iPhone was released, Apple would not sell it to you. You had to buy it from a mobile network company Apple had made a deal with and were forced to take an insanely expensive "special iPhone plan" with it.

  42. The Clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably the most influential and some would argue the worst invention of all time.

  43. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swords?

  44. Top 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Mathematics
    2. Money
    3. Yoga pants

  45. Electricity via Hydroelectric Dam by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

    Everything else starts here.

  46. Seriously? by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    I can forgive ignoring the lighter, the bread slicer, the zipper, and the soldiering iron, but no duck tape?

    1. Re:Seriously? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      Maybe because it's duct tape?

    2. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it's duct tape?

      No, I use duck tape on my ducks, duct tape would be silly

    3. Re:Seriously? by Drishmung · · Score: 1
      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    4. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because it's duct tape?

      Believe it or not, there is a variant brand name called "Duck Tape"!
      Quack.

  47. A Matter of Perspective by Rollgunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My grandmother, who before passing away not too long ago at the age of 99, felt that despite seeing automobiles, computers and television all come of age, the microwave oven was the thing that made the largest impact in her life as a housewife. Her husband was a doctor, and with his irregular hours, it was nearly impossible to have a hot dinner ready for him when he got home, but the microwave changed that completely. It was a revolution in the production of hot meals, which is something most of us take for granted.

    1. Re:A Matter of Perspective by Gussington · · Score: 1

      My grandmother, who before passing away not too long ago at the age of 99, felt that despite seeing automobiles, computers and television all come of age, the microwave oven was the thing that made the largest impact in her life as a housewife.

      Another Apple hater. Why deny the iPhone as the greatest invention mankind ever created? The only reason there are starving kids in Africa is because they don't have iPhones yet...

    2. Re:A Matter of Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My grandmother saw airplanes develop, automobiles, planes, the Apollo landing, was emailing on a computer in the years before she died. She said the greatest technology in her lifetime was indoor plumbing since they used outhouses when she was little.

  48. There is only 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pencil / writing stick.

    All other gadgets non existence, bur for stoke of the pencil.

  49. gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's many more important tools and appliances, sure, buy my ecig is the greatest gadget i own. No fancy vaping equipment or anything dumb, just a simple nicotine flute to get me by. I'd charge it instead of my phone. So many people I know have kicked smoking after long habits like myself and even though it's often mocked to me it really is a little miracle.

  50. There's a major one missing from this list: GoPro by xevioso · · Score: 1

    Where's the GoPro? That one should rank pretty high if you ask me.

  51. None of the above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soap.

  52. Does it really need to be spelled out? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Obviously it's James Bond's Aston Martin.

    My mother would tell you it's the washing machine and the VCR

    And there's the portable phone, about the only thing that no culture on earth sees as satanic. Now that's influence!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  53. Mobile phone beats the computer by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Mobile phone beats the computer. The advances of communications achieved in the poorest areas of the world is nothing short of amazing. Computers still need to achieve that kind of impact.

    I am talking about personal computers of course.

    I fully realize that a cell phone is a type of a computer, but if we start considering it, it will become a category of gadgets, not a gadget.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Mobile phone beats the computer by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You know that it was the personal computer, the same thing in the same box, that enabled the cellular phone that you're referencing? It is also those same sort of computers that, albeit in a different shaped box, enable that communication you speak of.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  54. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inclined plane.

  55. The Trump... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, I said it.

  56. The Fucking Clock. Then The Fucking Calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK

  57. Everyday tasks? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    The iPhone ... forever changing how we ... complete many everyday tasks.

    Like what? Seriously.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  58. Admit it, you were thinking it too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vibrator

    1. Re:Admit it, you were thinking it too. by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

      # 10?

  59. Mobile Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without that, most of what we are now taking for granted and has shaped modern society wouldn't work. Now if you want to go back a lifetime or 2, then of course this answer changes. Radically.

  60. Stephen Fry already did this - the lighter won! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://web.archive.org/web/20111205021713/http://www.channel4.com:80/programmes/stephen-frys-100-greatest-gadgets/articles/the-list

  61. The nuclear bomb by istartedi · · Score: 1

    During the Manhattan project, the bomb was referred to as a gadget.

    You can easily debate the influence, since it only covers the mid-20th century onward; but it was actually called a "gadget".

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  62. Steam Power Hands Down, Most Influential Gadget by Proudrooster · · Score: 1

    Ok, technically this isn't a pocket gadget, but it is still a gadget.

    Everything is modern life is supported by electricity. iPhones, AirConditioners, Mass Transportation, Warehouse Distribution Systems, New York City, Modern Factories, and yes even the financial sector.

    Electricity is supported by the steam engine (and lot's of copper wire).

    Whether it be coal fired, natural gas fired, oil fired, or a nuclear powered electric plant these are nothing more than giant steam engines. We boil water with coal, gas, oil, and nuclear fission to heat water to make steam to turn a turbine to make electricity. Yes, steam power supports modern life and even modern warfare. Thomas the Tank Engine lives on in our modern steam turbine systems even in aircraft carriers.

    I wish I could say the most important gadget of all time was the hybrid nuclear/lithium ion battery that could power my city for 1 year on a single charge or solar power, wind power, or hydroelectric power, but alas it is not.

    Unfortunately we need to dig stuff up and burn it, which over the long term of the planet isn't a sustainable concept. Eventually we will run out of things to dig up and burn, but I guess would genetically engineer trees to grow really fast and switch to wood/charcoal power.

    I will give the final word to CIV4.
    R.I.P. Leonard Nimoy

    1. Re:Steam Power Hands Down, Most Influential Gadget by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Ok, technically this isn't a pocket gadget, but it is still a gadget.

      Everything is modern life is supported by electricity. iPhones, AirConditioners, Mass Transportation, Warehouse Distribution Systems, New York City, Modern Factories, and yes even the financial sector.

      The Steam engine's first use was providing fresh (and cooler) air in mine shafts, from there to the train which populated the US for one.

      The Train would of been my answer, but does require steam, and as u mentioned the electricity we've become custom to using.

    2. Re:Steam Power Hands Down, Most Influential Gadget by camperdave · · Score: 1

      No. The steam engine was first used to pump sump water out of the mines, not to pump air into them.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  63. Soap by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    Soap.

    Gretchen Ross: Look, I should go. For physics, Monnitoff is having me write this essay. Greatest invention ever to benefit mankind. Donnie Darko: It’s Monnitoff. But that’s easy. Antiseptics. Like the whole sanitation thing. Joseph Lister, 1895. Before antiseptics, there was no sanitation, especially in medicine. Gretchen Ross: You mean soap?

  64. Re:Apps! by suupaabaka · · Score: 1

    Why is this shit in every thread?

  65. No comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was just lame. Right up there with the click bait at the bottom of the screen, lol.

    The little tiny LED flashlight on my keychain has had more effect than an iPhone for me, so meh.

  66. Back a few generations by suupaabaka · · Score: 1

    The shaped flint?

  67. "devices by WITH consumers let the future creep.." by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    Well, I can't say I'm surprised that they omitted "the red pen" from their list.

  68. Re:Apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this shit in every thread?

    Because you haven't cleaned your glasses?

  69. The iPhone is the first toy smartphone by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    The iPhone was a total joke when it came out. It was pretty and different, but there were no applications for it other than what it came with (!), you couldn't even download files or copy and paste text. It was a few years before it got within reach of the capability of the Treo 650 I had at the time, which was my second smartphone more capable than the original iPhone and not even the best smartphone available at the time. Even then, the iPhone was and remains a toy to enable consumption, not a real computer. A real computer puts you in control of what it can do, allowing you to write and run your own programs on the device and download and run applications at will.

    The iPhone's success damaged computing itself more than any device or event in history by popularizing curated computing in place of general-purpose computing.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  70. Of ALL time? by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be the wheel? Or if it has to be something that is used standalone, one of the other simple machines invented in ancient times: the inclined plane (including screws) or the lever (mostly construction and cargo cranes in modern times).

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
    1. Re:Of ALL time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gadget

        small mechanical or electronic device or tool, especially an ingenious or novel one: a state-of-the-art kitchen with every conceivable gadget.

  71. The iPhone was a triumph... of marketing by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative
    The first iPhone was launched January 9, 2007, a full year after the LG Prada (and 15 years after the first touchscreen phone). LG's Prada included many of the UI, design, and functional elements claimed as iPhone "firsts".

    I'm sorry but PalmOS and even Windows Mobile did all of this way before the iPhone even hit the drawing board. There were even mobile phone versions in the the form of the Treo and Tungsten C.

    The only revolutionary thing about the iPhone is it broke out of the techie niche that previous devices had been trapped in and brought it mainstream, but I suspect the biggest reason for that is fashion rather than technical.

    Exactly. Multi-touch aside, the iPhone wasn't particularly innovative technologically, but it was the first mainstream non-techie smart phone.

    1. Re:The iPhone was a triumph... of marketing by infinite+jester · · Score: 1

      The first iPhone was launched January 9, 2007, a full year after the LG Prada

      Nope. From the very same Wikipedia you linked (emphasis mine): "[The LG Prada] was first announced on December 12, 2006. An official press release showing an image of the device appeared on January 18, 2007. Sales started in May 2007." Sales of iPhone began in June, 2007.

      --
      i thought, therefore i was...
  72. How has no one realized...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The slap chop! It has saved me countless minutes from my food prep!

  73. 'Gadgets' vs 'Non-Gadgets' by ShogZilla · · Score: 1

    Having browsed at 0 and seeing many items far more influential noted - I'd note that most of the items proposed hardly qualify as a gadget.

    Aside from prototype nuclear weapons, I can't see a circumstance where I'd accept 'gadget' as a descriptive of an item which couldn't be held in the hand... "Hand me that gadget over there", pointing in the direction of a hair dryer / cell phone / power drill / etc, sounds reasonable to me, while "Haul that gadget over here", pointing at a chain engine hoist / deep freezer / electron microscope / etc, sounds bloody odd / incorrect.

    None of this is to say that I agree with the iphone as a choice... I don't. I just don't think an airplane or printing press qualifies as a 'gadget'... A gun, however, might.

  74. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people can't comprehend or ponder periods of time greater than their own life span.

    And this period is getting shorter and shorter. So for some, this can be just a few years or even a few seconds.

    Now, what was I saying?

  75. not the gun, but close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Penis.

    1. Re:not the gun, but close by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Penis.

      No wonder you posted anonymously. A gadget is a small tool.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:not the gun, but close by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      This is my rifle, this is my gun. One is for shooting, the other is for fun.

      Seemed fitting...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  76. the plough by joss · · Score: 1

    The plough was a lot more influential than the wheel. Without the plough we would never have progressed far enough to need the wheel. It provided the surplus which all over advances depend on.

    In the last 100 years the most influential gadget is the washing machine. It released women from the home into the workplace, transforming society. The computer probably ranks second in importance in last 100 years but if the computer/internet combo had done as much good as one would hope then we would be a lot smarter than we are and the given answers would be less ridiculous.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    1. Re: the plough by joss · · Score: 1

      Oh .. I forgot to mention the most important gadget of last 60 years is probably the shipping container. This has had an extraordinary effect on our lives by (a) drowning us in cheap goods and (b) decimating local manufacturing.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  77. Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engine.. by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plough, spear, cooking pot, shoe, clothing, stirrup, wheel, compass, boat, sail, steam engine, sextant, knife, lightbulb, refrigeration, fishing hook, vacuum cleaner, broom, roof, walls, toothbrush, doors, scissors, calculator, windows, saw, axe, lathe, printing press, telescope, telegraph, slide rule, mirrors, drill, screw, radio, TV, to name a few.

    I was reading for example that the bicycle literally changed the DNA of England in a measurable way when people could now find mates a few villages over. The train would have had a similar type impact but might not qualify as a gadget.

    As for the iPhone (which I have one of) they will be something quaint we find in yard sales in 10 years. Basically like having a kickass VCR in 1982.

    I would say that the iPhone mostly just shook up the complacency of the telcos more than anything else. The iPhone was one of these technological developments that was inevitable. Just like ever improving battery technology makes the electric car inevitable. Tesla may very well move things along a bit more quickly but the electric car pretty much completely depends upon modern processors, batteries, and brushless motors.

  78. How about ? by randalware · · Score: 1

    Raspberry Pi, Perl, or the Apple ][ ?

              Computing logic to the masses !

              The number "zero" was pretty big too....

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
    1. Re:How about ? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi is on the list at number 45.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  79. Meh by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1
    First define gadget, this list seems to mean it as “electronic personal consumer device”.

    Not the wheel, soap, firearm, electricity, etc.

    Second, the list seems the be heavily weighted in current technology, kind of understandable to make people care, but the google glass of today is the Nintendo VR of the 90’s or the nest, or the rift, or segway, or 3d printer, 20 years these may be a joke

  80. Toilet paper. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 2

    Do I really need to explain why?

  81. Where Would We Be Without It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming gadgets are smaller things, the most influential of all time (excluding future gadgets) must be the stick. Where would we be today without the stick? A wheel is just a round thing that rolls away from you and falls over, unless you have a stick. A nail is just something that hurts to step on until you can hit it with a metal coated stick. And of course, sticks let you poke things. You'd never know that hungry lion was dead until you poked it with a stick and it didn't move. Imagine if early man didn't have poking sticks. They'd play dead until they actually died because they'd never know when it was safe to move again. Without the stick, our whole species would have died out.

    If that's a bit too early for you, then lets jump ahead to Facebook. Facebook needs the stick. Facebook wouldn't exist without the stick. Emails? Who reads those things. But a poke, well, you have to respond to a poke. Facebook got around by poking everybody. You can't ignore a poke. But without the stick there would be no poking, Facebook wouldn't have been able to touch you. Facebook would have stayed an online yearbook, never reaching its full potential.

    So yeah. Without the stick we wouldn't have social media, we'd all be stuck with AOL and MySpace accounts, we wouldn't have straight pretzels, and we'd all starve to death as kids because we'd never be able to walk away from that road kill.

    The stick gets my vote for the most influential gadget of all previous times and I hope you'll comment on TIME's site about their serious lack of respect for the awesome, the wonderful, the worthy yet humble stick.

  82. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By not defining "gadget" clearly enough, they opened the List to mere "Inventions", and as most Posts so far in this thread show, people have difficulty distinguishing the two.
    If we go by the American Heritage Dictionary:
    "n. A small specialized mechanical or electronic device; a contrivance."
    Emphasis on "small".
    Things like Refrigeration, the Printing Press, and the Nuclear Bomb just don't qualify. Just making something smaller is iterative.

    On the list, three clearly stand out- the Regency Transistor Radio, The Record Player, and the Brownie Camera, and only one of those was totally New- the Phonograph. Not only did nothing exist like it ever before, it introduced the concept of Time-Shifting; no longer was a Performance an ephemeral thing. Something could be recorded once, and played back indefinitely. That very concept made later Moving Pictures, Radio, TV, Walkman/CD/DVD, etc. comprehensible. It also, for the most part, killed off the "Home Music" Entertainment Industry; why bother learning how to play a Piano if one wanted Music in their life, whenever wanted?
    The Brownie would be next, and it also introduced a new Concept. Instead of dealing with Chemicals, and Plates, and fuss, one merely snapped a picture into a cheap, simple box, and sent the box off, and later get the box back, with a handful of Snapshots. Photography became a household hobby; even Dad could do it.
    The Regency Radio was iterative; it took something big, boxy, fussy, and expensive, and turned it into something cheap that could be slipped into a pocket. But it also introduced a new concept called "Teen- Agers". They didn't want to be stuck at home listening to Mitch Miller on the Family Magnavox; they wanted their music Portable, and _without_ Parental Supervision. "Going Mobile: Beep-Beep!"

    A fourth could be added, and it too introduced an entirely new yet subtle Concept- Accurate Time. Even when first introduced, the Harrison H4 Chronometer had limited applicability. _Very_ few people had the need to know Time to the nearest second back then. And BTW, which Time? London Time, Paris Time, New York Time? Even today, while most people happily use a pocket GPS without a fucking clue, they have no grasp of the basic Concept behind it- Accurate Universal Time.

    Captcha: miracle

  83. REally... All of you turn in your geek card. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    #1 Gadget that changed the world.

    Radio.

    90% of everything you use today depends on that first radio invention that was a gadget and curiosity.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  84. Re:Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadg by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    My name is ozymandias. King of Kings. Look at my works ye mighty and despair.

  85. The Thermos! by fullback · · Score: 1

    It keeps hot things hot and cold things cold.

    But, how does it know?

    1. Re:The Thermos! by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      It keeps hot things hot and cold things cold.

      But, how does it know?

      They don't work. I put a popsicle and a cup of coffee into mine and it didn't do the job for either.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  86. the (orginal) iPod by Zanadou · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of the posters here that things like refrigeration and air-conditioning are among the most influential "gadgets" of all time - or, at least for the period of post World War II. The modern world would bit a lot different without them.

    However, using the original article's limited sense of reference I would consider the (original) iPod to be far more influential than the iPhone (you could swap them around in Time's rankings); looking back, the original iPod's release really did start a small, personal revolution in our pockets: the iPhone just built on that.

    1. Re:the (orginal) iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't it be the Palm Pilot?

  87. Well duh! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    The battery powered vibrator. Apply anywhere to enjoy it's soothing relaxations.

    At Spencers gift stores everywhere.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  88. most influential gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote CowboyNeal

  89. The lamp, or the Apple ][ by steveha · · Score: 1

    The first lamps were a candle or something. These days, electric with LED lights or whatever, but either way: light when you want it, not just when the sun is up? Light where you want it... for example, in a cave, or in a building? Pretty huge.

    Does "lamp" qualify as a gadget? From TFS:

    Rather than rank technologies—writing, electricity, and so on—we chose to rank gadgets, the devices by with consumers let the future creep into their present.

    Huh, all their choices were brand name items and all recent technological items.

    Okay, more influential than anything else on their list: the original Apple ][ computer, which (combined with VisiCalc) jump-started the personal computer revolution. It deserves a place on that list more than whatever fine model of ThinkPad they picked, more than Raspberry Pi, more even than the Commodore 64.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:The lamp, or the Apple ][ by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't classify the number six ranked Victrola record player as a recent technological item, nor is it really a brand name item any more.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  90. iPhone by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I've always considered the iPhone to be a step back from the Palm Pilot. The Palm Pilot actually allowed you to have your information in your hand. The iPhone just opened a hand held gateway to the internet. I'd question what the iPhone has over the Palm Pilot that makes it more of an important gadget.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  91. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    The ones that you have highlighted are definitely worthy of making the list. But most of the others are not. Colour television yes, but why the Sony TV which came out 14 years after colour tv was released.

    If you want to go small electronic item, the home wifi router should be in that list long before lots of other things.

  92. Powerful iPhone? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    It's a 412MHz ARM11 with 128MB RAM from 2007.

    What about the 624MHz ARM powered iPAQ's with 128MB RAM from 2004?

  93. The greatest gadget of "all time" is Missing by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    The H4 clock developed by John Harrison in the 1760's.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    It was the most accurate portable timepiece yet developed and revolutionized ocean travel since it allowed ships to accurately determine their precise location and thus made reliable ocean commerce possible.

    With only two exceptions everything in TIME's list is less than 50 years old, most of it less than 30. Really a bit narrow for a list that is supposed to be "of all time".

    And yes, the wheel, pendulum clock and lever should be on that list too.

  94. keeping time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clock.
    Astrolab

  95. Segway? Really???? by sconeu · · Score: 1

    And no portable typewriter?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  96. Batteries to run vibrators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh!

  97. the pencil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or ball point pen

  98. Fourdrinier papermaking machine by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without low cost paper of consistent quality, none of the other gadgets could have been designed.

    My first choice would have been the pencil, but I thought again and realized that pencils are not very useful without good paper.

    1. Re:Fourdrinier papermaking machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just paper in general. Without paper of any kind we wouldn't have the kind of world we do now.

  99. The light bulb by hambone142 · · Score: 1

    Without it, we wouldn't be working or doing much else after sunset.

  100. reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because now I don't have to deal with the sh!t non-unicode love of slashdot

  101. Common element: Electric generation station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The common element in most of the 0 items on the Time Magazine Gadget List is all the items use directly or indirectly electricity from a public utility generating station.

    Here is what I am urging you to see: Most of these gadgets one way or another add a human value of hours of attention to hours of electricity.

    In the early 980's I got advertising rates and the promised audience from a TV station and I compared that with the total kilowatt hours likely to be used by the same audience powering their TV set to watch the same hours of TV as was sold by the TV station to a broadcaster. At that time, putting on a TV show resulted in "selling" many more dollars of electricity than the dollars spent to purchase TV time.

    All modern gadgets and even huge structures such as the physical internet are still doing essentially the same thing. Let me say this more precisely; as the gadgets are driven to do interesting things, the gadgets claim our attention.

    From this angle, the winner of the "most interesting gadget of all time" might be determined as being the gadget that has diverted more human hours of attention
    than any other gadget. Perhaps we should change the spelling from "gadget" to "getget" to emphasize the devices are getting something from us.

  102. The plough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as it meant we could develope matches to easily burn all the holy books!

  103. bzzzt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electricity

  104. Freakin' Laser Beam! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The laser has to be the most important gadget of modern times. Without lasers we wouldn't have cell phones, computers or anything made by lithography. We use it to measure temperatures and distances. Lasers are used in missile guidance systems. Even my smartphone uses a laser for the camera focus.

  105. The Chronometer followed by the Telegraph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    By creating an accurate, mobile timepiece, the chronometer made it possible to accurately chart one's longitude from a central point thereby creating accurate maps of the world (surveying chronometers), accurate navigation of seagoing vessels and increased trade between countries. (Note: I may be a bit biased in this because I just bought a wonderful Hamilton 21 Chronometer, which is widely believed to be the most accurate mechanical mobile timepiece ever constructed).

    Secondly, the Telegraph. Known as the "Victorian Internet", it connected countries and the world at a speed never seen before. Please look up the book "The Victorian Internet" to see it's affects.

    Gordon

  106. Transistor. by random_ID · · Score: 2

    Everything on that list requires them. Can you imagine an iPhone made with vacuum tubes?

    1. Re:Transistor. by orledrat · · Score: 1

      I nominate the photolithographic stepper. Either that or just a regular knife.

  107. Android Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It led the way in hardware and features with the iPhone playing catch-up.

  108. Re:Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was reading for example that the bicycle literally changed the DNA of England in a measurable way when people could now find mates a few villages over.

    Quick question: how does an object literally change the deoxyribonucleic acid of a country?

  109. Quill... by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    or Reed pens, maybe Papyrus

  110. No-brainer by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    That's a no-brainer. The Fleshlight.

  111. Mechanicals are gedgets, too! by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    If the printing press isn't a gadget, then the laser printer certainly is. Maybe the listed bubblejet printer counts, too.

    However the whole list falls apart on the semantics of "gadget". Time seem to have warped the definition to mean small (-ish) pop-culture commercial product. Thus limiting the scope to stuff produced within the past 50 years, with very, very few exceptions (box brownie camera and wind-up record player).

    I would suggest that in its time, the lever counted as a gadget, as does the medical syringe, adding machine, clock / watch, slide rule, vacuum cleaner and electric torch. Maybe even a bicycle, too. You could probably have an entire article on the top 50 kitchen "gadgets" - most of which have been more influential than a lot of the media-orientated ones in this list.

    But as others have alluded, Time has to pander to both its advertisers and its audience. So it will inevitably be hugely biased in favour of an amercian, middle-aged consumer.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Mechanicals are gedgets, too! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well if they are going to put the stupid makerbot on there, then the laser printer is fair game :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  112. the choice number 1 by parstiam · · Score: 1

    wow... Apple iPhone :)) I agreee ...

  113. The Teacup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Steven Fry;

    "They invented it so early that it was a disadvantage. It held back the course of Chinese history."

    and:

    "Glass. With glass came lens grinding, came telescopes and microscopes, and through spectacles, intellectuals and scientists had an extra twenty years of reading and active life, and further, all the way through to the invention of medical science, flasks, beakers, retorts . . . Because it's chemically neutral, glass, doesn't react to anything that's in it. And the Chinese had no glass made in all of China from the fourteenth century right up to the nineteenth century. "

    and....

    "And therefore no mirrors. So, in fact, just because they were satisfied with the tea cup and didn't bother . . . This incredibly ingenious race who would have otherwise invented so many other things, and did invent so many other things, were . . . the one thing they couldn't do. And electronics used glass for valves and so on. "

    QI Transcript

  114. Re:Apps! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Why is this shit in every thread?

    Because we still have AC posting.

  115. Condom and other birth control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because without it we'd of proven Malthus right a long time ago.

  116. Smartphone was gonna happen anyway by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a PDA back in those days. It was obvious to most everyone (except Microsoft, who completely missed the boat) that PDAs and phones were going to converge. The only question was if PDAs were going to pick up phone capability, or if phones were going to pick up PDA capability. Microsoft was in a position to make the former happen - they had vanquished Palm and controlled most of the PDA market with Windows CE/Mobile/their name of the year. But even when HP tried to make a WinCE PDA which could also make phone calls, Microsoft didn't lift a finger to help them.

    Blackberry ended up taking the first step to adding general-purpose computing to a phone. Once they opened that floodgate, it was a race to see who could make their phone the most general general-purpose computer (except Microsoft, even though that was exactly what they were trying to do with PDAs - trying to port the Windows API to PDAs).

    The only real contributions of the iPhone was lack of a physical keyboard - everyone else (except LG) was using a Blackberry-style keyboard, or a sliding keyboard, or a Palm Graffiti-style writing space. That was a huge bet by Apple, and the iPhone served as the proof of concept which green-lighted everyone else's touch-only on-screen keyboards most of them were already playing with in R&D. (The app ecosystem - instead of a handful of apps baked into the phone by the manufacturer - came later). A lot of the form and functionality people attribute to the iPhone actually came out first in the LG Prada, indicating the industry was already moving in that direction even when the iPhone hadn't yet seen the light of day.

  117. The. Gadget. by nastyphil · · Score: 1
    --
    Dialectician. Archology.
  118. Stone knives and Bear Skins by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Obviously the most influential items are stone knives and bear skins, from which you can build a duotronic circuit to access your tricorder, and decide the entire course of 20th century history.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  119. Pretty easy by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    The Colt Single Action Army Revolver.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  120. This one's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly it's the dildo.

    1. Re:This one's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. Came here just to say that.

  121. Re:Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engin by Gussington · · Score: 1

    I was reading for example that the bicycle literally changed the DNA of England in a measurable way when people could now find mates a few villages over. The train would have had a similar type impact but might not qualify as a gadget..

    Tinder has to top all of those then :)

  122. most influential letters, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C, D and O outrank our entire industry.

  123. The handwatch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does not need to be a smart one :P
    but it has to tell time :)

  124. Knife by Kim0 · · Score: 1

    Knife.

    1. Re:Knife by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Knife.

      Yep, no doubt about it, the knife. I lead to clothes and artificial shelter (tents) long before the wheel, printing press, gun were ever around.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  125. Re:Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spear

    This. Spear is the thing that lifted us to the top of the food pyramid.

  126. systemd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best thing ever, at least within the Linux world!

    1. Re:systemd by aglider · · Score: 1

      flamebait! flamebait!

      --
      Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  127. Human brain by aglider · · Score: 1

    Of course!

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  128. the internal combustion engine by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    the internal combustion engine has had a LOT of influence. the ICE's need for fuel has driven wars. the acquisition of the fuel has poisoned towns/villages, caused earthquakes, wiped out sea life in the gulf. the ICE's burning of fuel is melting the polar ice caps, altered the weather, made the sea more acidic and despite knowing that, it still threatens the future of the human race.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  129. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but this is a list of 'gadgets'.
    I.e. electronic devices targeted to solving 1st world problems, not real ones. That cuts stuff like 'refrigerator' or 'combustion engine' right out of the contest.

  130. It says "gadget" so by phorm · · Score: 1

    I guess that fridges, combustion engines etc might be out (a bit big to be a "gadget")? However I think that mobile phones in generally would certainly count and you certainly can't have an iPhone without first having had a cellular/mobile phone...

  131. Matter of perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall that the most important gadget of the 20th century was the washing machine, as it freed women from their house duties enough to realize that their lot in life was crap, and (together with WW2) led to the Women's suffrage movement and other important advances in equality.

    Or, you know, an iPhone...

  132. pen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its the pen, hands down.

  133. the screw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screws. Invented about 1060 to keep visors and helmets together on armour.

    Now, try to find a gadget that doesn't have this gadget. Remove all the screws from your gadget and ghen discuss influence and prevalence.

    Not my pick BTW. im indebted to the author commissioned in 2000 to write a book about the most influential tool of the past millenium. its a good book!

  134. The Slashdot Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for it contains only stuff that matters!

    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

  135. Ignoramus fluff by Shaiku · · Score: 1

    What a retarded piece of contemporary fluff bullshit. Surely people of the past thought the same thing about horseless carriages, pocket watches and clocks accurate enough for navigation, the compass, the sextant, cargo ships, railroads, TNT, the fucking wheel, portable fire sticks, airplanes, radio, all sorts of farming equipment, the telegraph and the telephone, operational amplifiers, general purpose computers, vacuum tubes, semiconductors, etc. etc.

    The iPhone is just a polished consumer device that presents a variety of previously existing technologies in an appealing way to technopeasant masses. In no way do high volume sales translate to relevant influence on humanity. Go research Tulip Mania and I'm sure TIME would have presented the tulip as one of the most influential investment strategies of all time.

    In reality this meaningless shit will be forgotten about in 5 generations, just like TIME and all the other dinosaurs that failed to make the leap from dead-tree media to the Internet.

  136. Where on the list is the knife ? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

    Portable, personal, transformative, and with a legacy that changed (and terminated, at time) many lives.

  137. Thats your list of killer features is it? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Oh boy. I bet you're a millenial who thinks the world started in 2007 when St Jobs stood on stage with his overpriced copy of plenty that had gone before but with added fanboy fairy dust?

  138. Not on the list by jandersen · · Score: 1

    This is where I become tedious and irritating by pointing out something totally outside the scope of the article, which I have honoured by not reading it. To me there is no doubt that the humble knife is the most influential gadget of all time. Invented something like 2 million years ago, it is still one of the most universally useful tools around - cutting edge, as it were. It probably originated by accident from when the hammerstones that our ancestors would have used to crack nuts (like our cousins, the chimpanzees and others still do) broke and formed a sharp edge, and although we use different materials now, it is remarkable how little it has fundamentally changed over the eons. How many smartphones will be around in two million years?

  139. The Wheel by ytene · · Score: 1

    No, respectfully not a troll. I do appreciate that "the wheel" might be stretching the definition of "gadget", but on the other hand just think what that humble invention has enabled is to do...

  140. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.
    I'm not sure that the Home Wifi Router qualifies; it just eliminates one cable. Instead of being limited by the length of Ethernet cables, one is limited by the range of Wifi. One is still tethered.
    Again, sticking with the strict definition of a small self-contained "Gadget" that utterly changes the way Life is lived thereafter, I would also list:
    Eyeglasses
    Amalgam Fillings
    Elastic Underwear (Don't laugh; when was the last time that you saw Garters on a Man? (Dad wore them; I'm old.))
    Cylinder Locks
    Thermometers

    When it comes to Electronics, pretty much all of it is iterative; even the Walkman was a shrunk-down version of portable Cassette Decks already available. The handheld GPS depends on a huge Infrastructure already in place. LED Lighting is already huge, but is hobbled by preconceptions about how Lighting is done.
    The DMM is pretty close, because it packs in so much more functionality than an old Simpson 260 VOM, which at one time only a Professional could afford.
    The Pocket Calculator- Hell Yes! We now have more than two Generations of Engineers and Students who lack an intuitive sense of Math. (The most common mistake seems to be being wrong by exactly an order of Magnitude.)
    The Digital Laser Level. In just a few years, I saw an entire Surveying Group replaced by these handy little Gadgets, much like our Professional Photography Group was replaced by any Experimenter with a Digital Camera. I don't count Digital Cameras in the same Class, because they are iterative in nature, and Camera Optics has a long way to go to catch up with the Sensors. The Digital Laser Level was New.

    In fact, I have a Beef with Digital Cameras. They are just _wrong_ in concept. We _don't_ live in a RGB World. We are just constrained to that Concept by Biology.
    Imagine, if you will, a Sensor design that counts every Photon coming in, and when appropriate, sums those counts for intensity. Each photon also gets measured for energy; UV is higher energy than IR for instance. To eliminate all Optics issues, the Sensors are bundled together in a Sphere, with each individual "Pixel" Collimated; it only sees the photons that it is directly aimed at, and irrelevant photons are discriminated against by Coincidence techniques.
    These Cameras exist, in an inside-out manner, starting with HERA back in the Eighties, moving on to GAMMASPHERE now, and GRETA is next. Oh, they are Sensitive only to Gamma Rays at present, but the Principle is the same; Photons are Photons.
    In fact, for Visual Photons, such a Camera would be quite compact. Unfortunately, processing images obtained this way is currently impractical.

    Captcha: metrical

  141. Slashdot Asks... by trawg · · Score: 1

    ... is not as good as Ask Slashdot.

  142. The Gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Gadget

  143. Washing machines and cellphones by zmooc · · Score: 1

    The BBC used to run a documentary - "Electric Dreams" - about a family that lived like people did in each decade of the past century. It clearly showed that the washing machine was the real life changer, the number one reason running a family no longer was an actual full time job. It should without any doubt be on the top of this list, well above the refrigerator.

    To myself, the cellphone would be the number one life changer, not the smartphone. It's not so much carrying a computer around that makes the huge difference, it's being able to communicate with anybody at all times. I find it almost inconveivable how much time we used to spent making appointments and waiting for each other at meeting points. Going into town or to a concert of festival used to start with making appointments. Now you just go there and meet up. Even though we now do all that using smart phone features, it was the cell phone that was the game changer.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  144. Short memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those young'uns have just short memories.

    What were we talking about, again?

  145. it is All Time list , not end of XX century by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knife is number one - in multitude of forms over time is the most interesting "wearable" gadget.
    and ... it changed drastically history many times. True disruptive technology.
    "beware the Ides of March."

  146. Slice bread maker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hands down!

  147. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's less a list of "influential gadgets" and more a list of "junk that middle-class suburban manchildren with too much money on their hands have bought"

  148. Palm was doing the App thing before Apple by mrlinux11 · · Score: 1

    The Palm Pilot did all the things the iPhone did long before the iPhone.

  149. Some of My List From Most Important... by BrendaEM · · Score: 2

    Plow
    Spear
    The Knife and Sword
    Fire
    Cloth
    A House
    The Bed
    Bandages
    The Refrigerator
    Hammer, Anvil, and Chisle
    The Saw, Hewn, Chisel, and Plane
    Bow and Arrow
    Matches and Lighter
    Spinning Wheel
    Button and Zipper
    Toothbrush, Toothpaste, and Floss
    Cotton Gin
    The Grain Mill
    The Compass
    The Pen, Paper, and Pencil
    The Boat and Ship
    Steam Engine and Locomotive
    Penicillin
    Generator/Alternator
    Electric Light Bulb
    The Microwave Oven
    Gas and Diesel Engines
    The Umbrella
    The Washing-machine and Dryer
    Bicycle
    The Internet
    Telephone
    Record Player
    Television
    The Personal Computer
    The Motorcycle and Automobile
    The Airplane
    The Rocket
    The Neodymium Magnet
    The Space Shuttle
    The Integrated Circuit
    The Transistor, Capacitor, Inductor, Wire, and Printed Circuit Boards
    Currency
    The Light Emitting Diode
    The Cellphone
    The Amplifier and Speaker

    Gadgets by definition are supposed to be things we don't need.
    To state that there's an important gadget is a contradiction.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  150. Old stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Bow drill for making fire.
    2. Soap
    3. Plow

  151. Fleshlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Penis.

    The Fleshlight.

  152. Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper

  153. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by jittles · · Score: 1

    Initially I thought they were limiting it to post 1970s stuff and then they throw in an 1850s record player.

    Dude! That's the only way to listen to vinyl. If you're not going to use that record player in the article, you might as well just buy a CD or an MP3. You guys are so behind the times here.

  154. gutenberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 7 basic machines
    fire
    the printing press

    I think Gutenberg changed it all.

  155. Re:Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if we exclude inventions, a gadget would be the last thing you remove before getting naked.
    Trouble is Time mucked it up by including things like a TV set - an appliance not a gadget.
    A good gadget is also breakable, and you might fret if you loose it.

    1) Wedding Ring. Women know the value of this, and marking the man as ' owned'
    2) Reading Glasses
    3) Watch, and quartz watch to pre-mobile phone days. Calculator watch for nerds
    4) Compact with mirror and lipstick - every women packs one but not all women have iPhones.
    5) Before dentistry, false teeth
    6) Till 1900, everyone packed a pocket or knife.My first pocketknife.
    7) Biro - Bic pen - Fountain pen, and before that quill and ink
    8) Can opener
    9) remote control or keys - because prior to 1920 keys were not universal.

    Now the iPhone is a gadget + wealth/status symbol plus a gossip pocket-knife + a brain for dummies

  156. facepalm by theghost · · Score: 1

    This comment section is pretty much just a contest to see who can be the most pedantic pedant to ever pedant.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  157. Two come to mind by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    The transistor and the atom bomb.

  158. the plow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd go with agriculture first, then literacy. Then there's the clock perhaps. The light bulb (perhaps electrical generator and/or transformers).

  159. Presentism as always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no different than those articles that run in Rolling Stone every few years listing the "greatest guitarists of all time" where whatever flavor of the week guitar hero is near the top of the list and in the next list is either gone or way at the bottom.

    Hell, the fact that the Segway even is on this list shows what a joke it is.

  160. How many of them were invented by Africans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None. Not one.

  161. the pocket watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    followed by the glasses and the pen. I use the three of them daily.

  162. Screwdriver by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    Needed for building all these things in the first place.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  163. Of All Time is a silly reference by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Please. There's been so many things that were invented since the dawn of time that it's an irrelevant question.

    The most enduring important invention, in my opinion, was the printing press. When information could be mass produced and distributed the world got a lot smaller. Of course there's been problems with information control for as long as people have communicated but this was the huge step.

    We asked a group of elderly relatives what they considered the invention that created the biggest change in their lives and their answer was the telephone. Being able to communicate over distance was an incredible change. To be able to contact someone immediately is something we take for granted.

    Electronics are nifty but it all seems to come down to the ability to communicate in better ways.

  164. The sewing needle by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    Including the 'needles' made of plant spines other sharp objects. Without this we wouldn't have been able to stitch pelts together to make clothing and clothing allowed us to live in nearly every environment.

    My list also includes the knife. Early ones were made from stone, such as flint, by striking the flint with another stone shaping it into a hand held gadget with a cutting edge. It's the direct ancestor of my pocket knife. It provided a simple tool that was used to shape things such as pelts, branches, etc. Must be older than the needle.

    Last, but definitely least, I'd say the fire kit which would consist of a stick of hardwood that could be made to rotate fast using the hands or a small bow onto a softer wood. Friction would create hot wood power that was used to start fires. Fire gave access to food which needed to be cooked such as roots and tubers and food which was better cooked such as meat. Our ancestors also used fire to manipulate their environment to their benefit.

    Most of the gadgets in the article are not available to many or most of the earth's population but a cutting gadget, sewing gadget, and control of fire shaped provided for our species survival.

    --
    Nate
  165. Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The plow.

  166. If we just stick to modern electronics by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    It's obviously the mobile phone. Smart phones are just addenda because almost anyt problem you can solve with a smart phone, you could call someone and figure out. But my favorite invention is the bicycle.

  167. gadget by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    The battery powered dildoe

  168. all new gadgets. by brunnegd · · Score: 1

    Nothing here older than 40 years. What about the telephone, by Alexander Bell?

  169. Real talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go get a three inch deck screw and drive it into a piece of wood with a hand screwdriver.
    You can't. You certainly can't all day long.
    One might think this makes the screwgun (drill) the most important, but it's not, it's the battery that makes that possible.
    The things that change the world are ALWAYS the things that allow you to store energy and use it later. The bow and arrow, dynamite, the internal combustion engine, the clock spring, hell, the weights on a cuckoo clock. If you can do work when it's easy and spend it when it's hard, you are winning at life.

  170. Gadgets or tech or all-time human achievements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gadgets: printing press; electric light bulb; internal combustion engine; battery; telegraph; telephone; cathode ray tube; telescope; microscope; transistor; integrated circuit; (and many more)
    Tech: steam power; A/C current & long-distance electrical xmission (Tesla); assembly line; hydroelectric; automobiles; rockets; satellites; nuclear fusion; many more
    Achievements: controlled use of fire; flint; stone tools; spear; wheeled transportation; smelting; agriculture; hybridization; domestication of animals; controlled fermentation; throwing clay; mud brick construction; thatched roof; organised communities; cave painting; heiroglyphs; alphabit; written word; diversification of language; boats; navigation by stars; Stonehenge observatory; sextant; philosophic inquiry; library; scientific method; pasteurization; germ theory; medicinal use of plants; synthetic meds; sterilization; surgery; and so on.

  171. Lots of obvious omissions by dakra137 · · Score: 1

    Out, by some definitions of "gadget":
    blacksmith {tongs, bellows, hammer, anvil}. Tongs are listed by the ancient Rabbis (Pirkei Avot, Chapter 5, Mishna 8) as first being made by God, because blacksmiths need a set of tongs to make new ones.

    sewing needle
    spinning wheel
    screwdriver, hammer, pliers
    knife

    Allowed, by all:
    toaster
    clocks & watches, including sundials
    spirit level
    lock washer
    laser pointer
    safety razor
    electric shaver
    pencils (wooden, mechanical)
    pens (fountain, ball point, etc.)
    Whiteboard markers
    mop, broom, dustpan, vacuum cleaner
    sponge, scotchbrite pads
    Norelco Philips Carrycorder 150 (Cassette)
    ratchet {screw or socket} driver
    Vice Grip Pliers
    Hand Egg Beater
    Coffee Grinder
    Coffee Maker {Percolator, French Press, Mr. Coffee, siphon / vacuum}
    vegetable peeler
    can opener
    Slide rule {especially circular}
    international power socket adapter (with or without a transformer)

  172. Re:Apps! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

    would you rather have GNAA/goatse/or golden girls?

  173. Television by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I chose this one because I saw a cartoon of Leonardo da Vinci in his lab with a TV set, holding the power plug he says to his assistant, "Now I have to invent the electric receptacle, the antenna, and God knows what else."

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  174. Paper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper's ability to copy almost anything by pressing into it and rubbing graphite, is the most substantial I think.

  175. Re:Oh god. List by idiots by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    I feel like my brain just got dumber reading that list. The Wii? Fit bit? Oculus rift? Nest Thermostat? Roku Netflixs?

    None of those things should even make the top 10,000 let alone the top 50. Initially I thought they were limiting it to post 1970s stuff and then they throw in an 1850s record player.

    nobody mentioned the nose hair trimmer.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  176. Duh by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    The big rock to smash things with. That started everything. Without it we'd still be lemurs.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  177. a tie by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    the chromosome, or the mitochondrion.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  178. Re:Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engin by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    People mated typically within a reasonable walk of their village. With a bike that range increased. These villages were old and a bit inbred. Bikes then stirred the DNA pot.

  179. Is slashdot newsy now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this list of 50 most influential gadgets.

    You won't believe what #1 is.

    Tell us what you think in the comments.

  180. not the iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the refrigerator. It has revolutionized how we have lived for the last 50 years.