their servers will explode when they take a stab at Navier-Stokes. I asked Wolfram-Alpha, but it simply returned the exact solution of a degenerate case, the solution being 'Fuck you.'
Your solution: Hide or pretend the vulnerability doesn't exist, or ignore the possible ramifications of its exploitation and further promote shoddy programming practices.
The better solution: Make the vulnerability public so that the company is forced to do something about it immediately, hence preventing any threats (pending their programming practices improving).
Full disclosure puts the responcibility on the company to keep their products/services secure, as to keeping it a secret, which puts the burden on whistleblowers fearing prosecution.
In 'No Russian', you play as an American CIA agent, and you, as an AMERICAN agent, lay round after round into the innocent populace, alongside the Russian antagonist. I think the even larger message Infinity Ward sends with this mission is the atrocious things the American government is willing to do for the sake of 'National Security'.
Does anyone else see the hilarity in this? Not to mention their foreshadowing of American soldiers torturing an informant via electrocution! Each side of the geopolitical spectrum gets demonized in their own right.
But hey, lets just hate on the game that shows the gritty reality of the world.
Dear Mr./Mrs. aeielCo,
On behalf of the Society for My Foot In Your Ass, I cordially accept your invitation. When and where can I express my gratitude, kind liaison?
But what about moon-riot control? Hopefully those lifter-bots are programmed with empathy towards the moon-hippies that chain themselves to their moon rocks. I wonder if there will be an Earth movement along the lines of, well, I guess, 'Grey-Peace' moon hippies against what ever strip-mine ore acquiring process that is eventually developed.
If a Molotov cocktail is thrown in space, does it make a noise?
Although I am all for the proliferation of decent software, Apple should be considerably nervous about these kinds of offerings. Right now the support loop for hardware is fairly closed; the amount of variables they must take into consideration when providing tech-support is fairly small considering they control the hardware side of things so tightly.
On the same token, it seems these days a lot of add-on hardware is Mac compatible, hard drives, memory, video cards, sound cards, the list goes on...so this leads me a conclusion of Apple putting more bullets in its feet as the list of upgrades and add-ons for Apple machines grows; they lose that hardware control variable.
This leads to the next conclusion, at what point does outfitting a machine with tons of non-factory-spec hardware separate it from a ground up build? If it is just the motherboard, then they are facing a conundrum.
Again, IANAMU, does Apple's support coverage encompass machines with things like user-added memory & videocards? If it does, then eventually they might as well just allow individuals to purchase OEM copies for their build, seeing as their support loop must scale to additional interoperability anyways.
With the large number of individuals in the world with amputated limbs, this is nice to see. If only more time and research went into things like this instead of bureaucratic endeavors. Can we change our government to "Scientific Method for the People, By the People"?
It just seems so back-asswards that the source-code & logic that sifts through millions of lines of data to determine our president is kept secret. What is the secret? There should not be anything to hide, therefore it should all be available, otherwise the machines are completely hypocritical to democratic transparency.
If it is the companies intellectual property that concerns the government, well perhaps there should be a clause in the contract that states contractors must provide ALL source code if they win the bid. It would seem a system like that would bolster confidence in the system, and eliminate all the negative machine-fraud issues, while allowing multitudes of individuals to find any vulnerabilities or fallibilities in system, instead of a select few of individuals.
How much are they really going to get from Web 2.0? Where the best party is on frat row? What Joe Blow's opinion is on policy x vs. policy y? Grandma's photo of Fluffy? I would imagine those truly interested in acts of Federal Offense would avoid large, preexisting cross-linked networks like this. If anything, motivation is more towards being a Surveillance State, or to catch some technologically ignorant people doing really bad things.
Examples of Exxon's animosity towards green energy, and items outlining their profit motivation:
1. Exxon records huge profits this year amidst recession: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003744.html
Why not help us out and lower oil prices? Or show interest in alternative energy besides publicity stunts?
7. I know correlation is not causation, but consider the following: Exxon is the largest publicly traded oil company: finance.yahoo.com
They even state that on their own website. They have flip-flopped on global warming to please politicians, so they can please their constituency. They have donated money to people who have money in their company. Lets see, largest traded oil company, has Washington in it's back pocket, they protect their financial interest over anything else.
Exxon buys them out, or lobbies against the tech and throws campaign money to the folks that make the municipal decisions, as big oil does with everything else progressive that possibly endangers their energy monopoly.
The universe patched to 1.2, introducing Ribbon controls, because they collapse and expand in a visually appealing fashion. This helps the overlords better manage their multi-dimension MDI.
I disagree. Americans (politicians in particular) do not have enough faith in the constitution. This mindset of it being a "living document"; continually editing, revising and reinterpreting the original message shows our lack of faith in it.
Initially I suppose people invested their faith in the hopes of escaping tyranny, taxation without representation, quartering of troops and whatnot. As far as my faith in the constitution, I support it fully, albeit with continued changes, edits, and reinterpretations in the hands a the government that considers it a "living document" I lose faith in our ability to respect the wisdom in it. Don't blame the constitution or the bill of rights for human regression. Blame our government's own greed for powergrabs and overarching control.
And yes, It's a travesty that the its creators kept slaves after its inception, I guess from that point on it became a "living document" subject to reinterpretation and selective application based on who you were and what political position you had attained.
And another note, threads are powerful in their nature, and so is.NET, do you really want TCP/UDP & the Internet to be able to create threads on your processor. A dropped packed, a tampered connection; what is to stop things like unsafe code with pointers, and a few crossed threads from crashing your computer, instead of just crashing your browser from some javascript issues? Windows can go nuclear easy enough on its own.
If your trying to instantiate multiple client-side threads, count me out. Talk about exploitability! If your using ASP you can run server side threads no problem, but otherwise a bunch of threads started within a web-page would be a terrible idea, sloppy programmers and bad websites would bring your browser to its knees, choking anything that acts asynchronously.
Slashdot Mirror
their servers will explode when they take a stab at Navier-Stokes. I asked Wolfram-Alpha, but it simply returned the exact solution of a degenerate case, the solution being 'Fuck you.'
Seriously? You must work for the government..
Your solution: Hide or pretend the vulnerability doesn't exist, or ignore the possible ramifications of its exploitation and further promote shoddy programming practices.
The better solution: Make the vulnerability public so that the company is forced to do something about it immediately, hence preventing any threats (pending their programming practices improving).
Full disclosure puts the responcibility on the company to keep their products/services secure, as to keeping it a secret, which puts the burden on whistleblowers fearing prosecution.
Which world do you prefer?
In 'No Russian', you play as an American CIA agent, and you, as an AMERICAN agent, lay round after round into the innocent populace, alongside the Russian antagonist. I think the even larger message Infinity Ward sends with this mission is the atrocious things the American government is willing to do for the sake of 'National Security'.
Does anyone else see the hilarity in this? Not to mention their foreshadowing of American soldiers torturing an informant via electrocution! Each side of the geopolitical spectrum gets demonized in their own right.
But hey, lets just hate on the game that shows the gritty reality of the world.
How is babby formed????? how is babby formed? how girl get pragnent? Yahoo Answers
I'll be sure to bring cupcakes and a chainsaw.
Dear Mr./Mrs. aeielCo, On behalf of the Society for My Foot In Your Ass, I cordially accept your invitation. When and where can I express my gratitude, kind liaison?
But what about moon-riot control? Hopefully those lifter-bots are programmed with empathy towards the moon-hippies that chain themselves to their moon rocks. I wonder if there will be an Earth movement along the lines of, well, I guess, 'Grey-Peace' moon hippies against what ever strip-mine ore acquiring process that is eventually developed.
If a Molotov cocktail is thrown in space, does it make a noise?
Only Al Gore will know.
IANAMU
Gotcha, thanks for the clarification.
Although I am all for the proliferation of decent software, Apple should be considerably nervous about these kinds of offerings. Right now the support loop for hardware is fairly closed; the amount of variables they must take into consideration when providing tech-support is fairly small considering they control the hardware side of things so tightly.
On the same token, it seems these days a lot of add-on hardware is Mac compatible, hard drives, memory, video cards, sound cards, the list goes on...so this leads me a conclusion of Apple putting more bullets in its feet as the list of upgrades and add-ons for Apple machines grows; they lose that hardware control variable.
This leads to the next conclusion, at what point does outfitting a machine with tons of non-factory-spec hardware separate it from a ground up build? If it is just the motherboard, then they are facing a conundrum.
Again, IANAMU, does Apple's support coverage encompass machines with things like user-added memory & videocards? If it does, then eventually they might as well just allow individuals to purchase OEM copies for their build, seeing as their support loop must scale to additional interoperability anyways.
With the large number of individuals in the world with amputated limbs, this is nice to see. If only more time and research went into things like this instead of bureaucratic endeavors. Can we change our government to "Scientific Method for the People, By the People"?
It would explain why everybody pictured on their packaging is smiling...
Norton ViagraWorks 2010?
Alex: "Two geeks penetrating a system backdoor?"
Contestant: "What is DDRASSRAM?, Alex."
Alex: Painfully correct sir, painfully correct.
CREEPROM!
"if the source code for voting machines is made public"
/TinFoilHat
Iranians may have definative proof.
*secretive. whoops.
It just seems so back-asswards that the source-code & logic that sifts through millions of lines of data to determine our president is kept secret. What is the secret? There should not be anything to hide, therefore it should all be available, otherwise the machines are completely hypocritical to democratic transparency.
If it is the companies intellectual property that concerns the government, well perhaps there should be a clause in the contract that states contractors must provide ALL source code if they win the bid. It would seem a system like that would bolster confidence in the system, and eliminate all the negative machine-fraud issues, while allowing multitudes of individuals to find any vulnerabilities or fallibilities in system, instead of a select few of individuals.
How much are they really going to get from Web 2.0? Where the best party is on frat row? What Joe Blow's opinion is on policy x vs. policy y? Grandma's photo of Fluffy? I would imagine those truly interested in acts of Federal Offense would avoid large, preexisting cross-linked networks like this. If anything, motivation is more towards being a Surveillance State, or to catch some technologically ignorant people doing really bad things.
Examples of Exxon's animosity towards green energy, and items outlining their profit motivation:
1. Exxon records huge profits this year amidst recession: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003744.html
Why not help us out and lower oil prices? Or show interest in alternative energy besides publicity stunts?
2. Exxon's own website: http://www.exxon.com/USA-English/Lubes/Products_Services/Products_Services_Collection.asp
Not a single service regarding 'green energy'. And this company make billions, but where are the alternative energy options? They don't care. They have the monopoly among many others in the OPEC conglomerate.
3. "In this class action, the class representatives proved that Exxon failed to provide the agreed reduction in wholesale prices...":
http://www.exxondealerclassaction.com/faq.php3
4. Exxon buys out global-warming, green energy think tank, denies global worming: http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/02/news/companies/exxon_science/index.htm
5. Exxon flips on global warming because the rockafeller tell them they will lose money: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/28/climatechange.fossilfuels
6. Exxon contaminates water amidst its own scientist suggestions otherwise: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125598438080394827.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs
7. Oil Congress: http://www.exxposeexxon.com/ExxonMobil_politics.html
8. Overall campaign contributions: http://www.campaignmoney.com/exxon_mobil.asp
7. I know correlation is not causation, but consider the following: Exxon is the largest publicly traded oil company: finance.yahoo.com
They even state that on their own website. They have flip-flopped on global warming to please politicians, so they can please their constituency. They have donated money to people who have money in their company. Lets see, largest traded oil company, has Washington in it's back pocket, they protect their financial interest over anything else.
Exxon buys them out, or lobbies against the tech and throws campaign money to the folks that make the municipal decisions, as big oil does with everything else progressive that possibly endangers their energy monopoly.
The universe patched to 1.2, introducing Ribbon controls, because they collapse and expand in a visually appealing fashion. This helps the overlords better manage their multi-dimension MDI.
I disagree. Americans (politicians in particular) do not have enough faith in the constitution. This mindset of it being a "living document"; continually editing, revising and reinterpreting the original message shows our lack of faith in it.
Initially I suppose people invested their faith in the hopes of escaping tyranny, taxation without representation, quartering of troops and whatnot. As far as my faith in the constitution, I support it fully, albeit with continued changes, edits, and reinterpretations in the hands a the government that considers it a "living document" I lose faith in our ability to respect the wisdom in it. Don't blame the constitution or the bill of rights for human regression. Blame our government's own greed for powergrabs and overarching control.
And yes, It's a travesty that the its creators kept slaves after its inception, I guess from that point on it became a "living document" subject to reinterpretation and selective application based on who you were and what political position you had attained.
And another note, threads are powerful in their nature, and so is .NET, do you really want TCP/UDP & the Internet to be able to create threads on your processor. A dropped packed, a tampered connection; what is to stop things like unsafe code with pointers, and a few crossed threads from crashing your computer, instead of just crashing your browser from some javascript issues? Windows can go nuclear easy enough on its own.
If your trying to instantiate multiple client-side threads, count me out. Talk about exploitability! If your using ASP you can run server side threads no problem, but otherwise a bunch of threads started within a web-page would be a terrible idea, sloppy programmers and bad websites would bring your browser to its knees, choking anything that acts asynchronously.