Slashdot Mirror


Ultracapacitor Bus Recharges At Each Stop

TechReviewAl writes "A US company and its Chinese partner are piloting a bus powered by ultracapacitors in Washington DC. Ultracapacitors lack the capacity of regular batteries but are considerably cheaper and can be recharge completely in under a minute. Sinautec Automobile Technologies, based in Arlington, VA, and its Chinese partner, Shanghai Aowei Technology Development Company, have spent the past three years demonstrating the approach with 17 municipal buses on the outskirts of Shanghai. The executive director of Sinautec touts the energy efficiency of this approach: 'Even if you use the dirtiest coal plant on the planet [to charge an ultracapacitor], it generates a third of the carbon dioxide of diesel.'"

419 comments

  1. They must be powerful... by unkaggregate · · Score: 4, Funny

    the company name says it all!

    *ZAP* Aowei!

    Oh, first post!

    1. Re:They must be powerful... by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      The posters and mods on this site are the same. There are a lot of nerdholes too. If it's an anonymous coward saying anything, you can ignore the poster because he's just a troll and would insult (insert religious figure here) just to get yelled at. It's the only way they can beat back the depression of their pathetic lives.

      . . . Wait a minute, where did you get modded troll? I don't even see the original post! Ah, screw it.

    2. Re:They must be powerful... by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      Oh right, my threshold knocked it out. Silly me.

    3. Re:They must be powerful... by longhairedgnome · · Score: 0

      You must be new here

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    4. Re:They must be powerful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a complete waste of a frist post.

      I shall now have to actually *look* for my goatse.

  2. Next model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next model will come with a flux supercapacitor, and will generate several sequels.

    1. Re:Next model by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it generate prequels?

    2. Re:Next model by glarbl_blarbl · · Score: 1

      hmm... I'm thinking it will be really hard to get the buses to be struck by lightning every time they need to be recharged. Cause how else are you going to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity you need?

      --
      I use friend/foe to signal strong [dis]agreement instead of mod points. What else are f/f good for?
    3. Re:Next model by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Using a supercapacitor, of course.

    4. Re:Next model by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Also, does this mean that the bus has to stop at every stop. Often when I'm riding buses in the morning (not in Shanghai mind you), the bus will just skip stops because it's completely filled up and nobody wants to get off, or because there's another bus with the exact same route directly in front of it, and stopping would just waste time. Basically this just seems like it would slow down the whole system, as buses would have to wait at each stop and you would have to make sure that there was enough charging stations at each stop to accommodate the number of buses that may get backed up at any one stop.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Next model by Eccles · · Score: 1

      1.21 gigawatts? Great Scott!

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:Next model by Elbows · · Score: 1

      Apparently it can go 3-5 miles on a charge, so it can skip stops. With that much range, I'd imagine only a few stops on the route even have charging stations.

    7. Re:Next model by smithmc · · Score: 1

      But will it go 88 miles per hour?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  3. Until... by cosm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exxon buys them out, or lobbies against the tech and throws campaign money to the folks that make the municipal decisions, as big oil does with everything else progressive that possibly endangers their energy monopoly.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Until... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if they do it every time then providing an example should be easy.

      go fetch.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Until... by timmarhy · · Score: 0, Troll

      nice tin foil hat.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Until... by srothroc · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a tin foil hat will do anything about lobbyists.

    4. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Done and done.

      http://pppad.blogspot.com/2007/05/nimh-held-hostage-by-chevron-texaco.html

    5. Re:Until... by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Interesting

      nice tin foil hat.

      Here's a real world example http://greentransportandenergy.blogspot.com/2009/03/great-importance-of-wheel-motors.html

      They had a working prototype, they approached Detroit to get their making-cars expertise... and the project gets quickly scrapped for no apparent reason.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It will prevent them from reading your mind.

      You never know what those lobbyists are up to...

    7. Re:Until... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a small problem with those... unstrung weight is really bad for handling, braking, and ride quality.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    8. Re:Until... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      There's a small problem with those... unstrung weight is really bad for handling, braking, and ride quality.

      I don't know what unstrung weight refers to in cars... but as far as that prototype I linked about, it had a computer controlling the 4 wheel motors, which was really good for handling, braking, accelerating and ride quality.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Until... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Informative

      And they helped kill streetcars. Of course, that was in conjunction with general motors and many others, but they've also had around 80 years to evolve even better strategies for killing better options.

      Anyone who trusts large companies to serve the public's best interest and willingly engage in competition they might lose should -put on- a tinfoil hat, one shaped like a cone that says "dunce" on it.

    10. Re:Until... by redmund · · Score: 5, Informative

      He meant Unsprung Weight, or the weight of the wheel and suspension and associated components. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_weight

    11. Re:Until... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      That blog makes no such claim. It does mention this, though:

      The performance of these wheel-motors have been tested in the laboratory, but at the time of the resignation of Dr. Couture, only 2 wheel-motors were installed on the Intrepid and the power electronics was not yet complete, hence the impossibility to have full testing on the road.

      It's an interesting idea, but it may very well be impractical. If it was all that (and then some), why aren't toyota, honda, tesla, or even gm all over it?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:Until... by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      "Conspiracy theories are popular among those who are more familiar with how Hollywood works than with how real life works." Best quote about conspiracy theories I've heard in a long time. It was said about the birthers and the 9/11 conspiracy theorists.

      --
      Qxe4
    13. Re:Until... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1, Troll

      conspiracy blog = you fail.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    14. Re:Until... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      He meant Unsprung Weight, or the weight of the wheel and suspension and associated components.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsprung_weight

      Ah, thanks for that info. I have no idea how the in-wheel weight affected the vibrations, but the computer control was meant to achieve high performance in acceleration (they had a nice demo on gravel, quite impressive), braking and handling (redistributing force one four wheel motors), which would compensate for that effect.
      And let's not forget that the motors are the brakes, and there is no drive shaft, etc.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:Until... by soundguy · · Score: 1

      That would be "unSPRUNG" weight. i.e. weight that is not isolated from the road surface by springs, airbags, or some other form of suspension.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    16. Re:Until... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      Is there any patent involved in the invention that you know of?

      If there is, then there's no point of further research, since the patent holder would exert their right over everything else.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    17. Re:Until... by DJRumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So what they need to do is reduce the weight of these independent motors, or find a way to place the suspension within the wheel assembly itself. Some kind of circular leaf spring assembly comes immediately to mind. Imagine a wheel axel, surrounded by springs rather than hard 'spokes' that connect it to the rubber.

      Kind of a 2 state suspension system with a small leaf spring system between the actual rubber and the motor, and then a heavier duty suspension between the axels and the rest of the car.

    18. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you write this on your petroleum based plastic-ware (keyboard, etc.), petroleum based shoes (rubbers, plastics....etc.)

      No petroleum, no computer-eum, shoes-eum, and all the way down the line.... Sucka'-eum!

      - "I drink yoooour milkshake! I drink it up!!!"

    19. Re:Until... by mozumder · · Score: 4, Informative

      He won, because you didn't refute the points in his link, but instead gone into a whiny wharrgrbl mode that losers usually do.

      Now, its your turn to prove that energy companies don't hold back technological progress to save their oil business.

      Otherwise, the other guy is beating you.

    20. Re:Until... by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      which would compensate for that effect

      I think you misunderstood.

      Unsprung weight needs to be controlled in motion by suspension and steering. So, geater unsprung weight has a negative impact on the handing of the vehicle.

      Not so much to do with acceleration and braking (though wheel weight and rotational inertia does come into it).

      As you point out, there are some advantages to the motor-in-wheel design which hopefully outweigh the negatives.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    21. Re:Until... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there any patent involved in the invention that you know of?

      If there is, then there's no point of further research, since the patent holder would exert their right over everything else.

      Yup, either Hydro-Québec or it's subsidiary TM4 holds the patents. Probably TM4, since it was created specifically to handle that technology.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    22. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      burden of proof doesn't work that way..
      otherwise i've got a purple dragon in my garage with photos, which

    23. Re:Until... by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realise that the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks is a conspiracy theory, don't you? Atta et al = conspirators.

      Not that I disagree with the official story, but it sort of punches a hole straight through your silly "argument".

    24. Re:Until... by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Informative
      the lawsuit mentioned on the blog did not prevent development of NiMH batteries as claimed. it restricted sales in north america only and only till 2007 or 2010.

      the negotiated terms did not have any bearing on the global market and looks a hell of a lot more like a battery division trying to make money off batteries and failing than it does any giant conspiracy.

      if you are looking for wharrgble look no further than OP's blog link. from the front page

      Saturday, October 10, 2009
      Get the Hell Outta Dodge

      What we want:

      Public transit
      Free Health care
      Retirement for all
      Better pay
      More freedom
      Equality
      Good jobs

      What we will get:

      More highway construction
      Higher taxes
      Oppression
      Slavery
      Spying
      Fascism
      Kleptocracy

      I am not the one making retarded claims and OP still hasn't provided any viable support to his claim.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    25. Re:Until... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      The patent holder has to show that they have a clear path to market and intend to develop the technology. They can't just sit there sqatting to prevent competition.

      --

      Liberty.

    26. Re:Until... by iron+spartan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From working with industrial automation, I can tell you that trying to synchronize motion between two independently controlled electric motors, with independent loads, is a nightmare. With modern control hardware we are getting better, but we are not there yet. In 1995, I sure that the could make it look good for some tests, but there was no control system fast enough or smart enough to handle it.

      Without even looking at the automotive side, i would kill to have a system that can manage multiple electric motors with rapidly changing load conditions for long periods of time without freaking out. The possibilities for material handling systems and machine tending systems make me drool.

      It was killed because Detroit couldn't make it work. The idea of wheel mounted motors gets kicked around a lot, because it does have a lot of merits, but there are too many technical problems that need to be worked out yet before it becomes viable.

    27. Re:Until... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      as a engineer having worked on mining trucks for 12years with wheel motors, that page seams very guilty of avoiding context. Komatsu (mostly GE), Liehbier (Siemiens+GE), and Caterpillar all have wheel motored mining vehicles in production. 1) They show no gearing reduction, electric motors are generally very in-efficient at high torque, they mostly run at around 40:1 reduction in real world car app, this kind of gearing reduction is very pricey to create for high torques without lots of space. 2) Electric motors require a very large current to produce those torques (especially if no gearing reduction) and/or lots of windings (lots of weight) big wiring, and difficult power supplies 3) they show no room for excitation of the rotor, this means permanent magnets = rare earth magnets = $$$ + dense weight. 4) very small bearing surface area, lots of spinning mass = lots of momentum = lots of torque when turning, bumps, etc. Front wheels sounds like a very bad idea. 5) single efficiency number is suspicious, as stated above torque is poor efficiency, I do believe the efficiency at higher speeds but not at high torque. 6) sealing against weather/dirt/mud. Even if they get only 4% loss, good luck with cooling that and sealing it at the same time, without dumping the heat into the tires which will already be under trouble (see the suspended weight = extra tire abuse) 7) still no economical battery choice that can make electric cheaper than diesel over the lifetime of a battery.

      That said, I want 2 for my 1970 2WD truck. It has room for them, and I could slap them on get regen braking, and emergency 4WD help. I don't need much help, and since 80% of braking energy is slowing from 75mph to 25mph so I don't care about the torque/efficiency from 25 to 0.

    28. Re:Until... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      they approached Detroit to get their making-cars expertise

      There's the reason - even approaching LADA in Russia would give them more expertise these days. Oddly enough the same companies do well elsewhere and the Detroit workers do well with short runs of designs from elsewhere.
      To be realistic once good ideas hit bad management stupid things happen.

    29. Re:Until... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Your bestiality porn might sell some places, but this is SLASHDOT!

      Oh, wait.............

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    30. Re:Until... by flibbajobber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ferrari are developing a hybrid with conventional mid-mounted engine driving the rear wheels, and in-wheel electric motors up front. The two big challenges are the unsprung mass contributing to poor ride and probably handling, and also that being unsprung the motors are subject to a lot of vibration and shock from the road surface so they take a beating.

      I'd be picking the motors might be technically in-wheel (or near enough) but aren't actually unsprung. They'd still likely require a gear reduction anyway, so wouldn't be a direct coupling from motor axle to wheel axle. They'll be "in-wheel" only so much as that is intuitive in a marketing sense i.e. one independent motor per wheel mounted at/near - but not "on" - the wheel axle.

    31. Re:Until... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      But there have been too many cases of just that, patent holder exert their rights over everything, and case remain locked in court for years and years, while costly legal battle drag on.

      It's not making any sense, but then, that's the way it is.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    32. Re:Until... by cosm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Examples of Exxon's animosity towards green energy, and items outlining their profit motivation:
      1. Exxon records huge profits this year amidst recession: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/30/AR2009013003744.html
      Why not help us out and lower oil prices? Or show interest in alternative energy besides publicity stunts?

      2. Exxon's own website: http://www.exxon.com/USA-English/Lubes/Products_Services/Products_Services_Collection.asp
      Not a single service regarding 'green energy'. And this company make billions, but where are the alternative energy options? They don't care. They have the monopoly among many others in the OPEC conglomerate.

      3. "In this class action, the class representatives proved that Exxon failed to provide the agreed reduction in wholesale prices...":
      http://www.exxondealerclassaction.com/faq.php3

      4. Exxon buys out global-warming, green energy think tank, denies global worming: http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/02/news/companies/exxon_science/index.htm

      5. Exxon flips on global warming because the rockafeller tell them they will lose money: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/28/climatechange.fossilfuels

      6. Exxon contaminates water amidst its own scientist suggestions otherwise: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125598438080394827.html?ru=yahoo&mod=yahoo_hs

      7. Oil Congress: http://www.exxposeexxon.com/ExxonMobil_politics.html

      8. Overall campaign contributions: http://www.campaignmoney.com/exxon_mobil.asp

      7. I know correlation is not causation, but consider the following: Exxon is the largest publicly traded oil company: finance.yahoo.com
      They even state that on their own website. They have flip-flopped on global warming to please politicians, so they can please their constituency. They have donated money to people who have money in their company. Lets see, largest traded oil company, has Washington in it's back pocket, they protect their financial interest over anything else.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    33. Re:Until... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess I should say how the mining application is different. They are RWD only, with motors inside dually wheels, with a solid axle box between duallys. This gives spacing to the bearings, room for gearing reduction, a good sealed box to push cooling air around everything. Also all diesel generator powered (no batteries) or trolley operated. The suspension is mostly the tires, which limits time at speed. They can go 40+ MPH, but not loaded for anything more than a few minutes, when they stop to dump and reload (may spend half their time loaded, but for short enough times to avoid too much heat buildup.) And only on well maintained roads, at least relative to the diameter of the tires and max speeds allowed.

    34. Re:Until... by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Unsprung weight is an issue, but not a major show stopper. You still need to put the brakes somewhere, as DOT requires mechanically activated brakes on all wheels. Regen braking won't hold the vehicle when its stopped anyway. Even it there was sufficient room within the wheel, that's still putting a lot of heat in there.

      The second issue is gearing. Electric motors are very inefficient as slow speeds. Without some gearbox involved, it's difficult to get an acceptable range of speed while not compromising slow speed efficiency. Compounding the problem is that the motor will likely be generating the most heat, when the wheel is turning very slow and has minimal cooling. With regards to total power, 4 smaller motors will weight much more than a single motor of equal power.

      I do like the concept for it's simplicity though. Rebuilding the "engine" could turn into "swapping" the engine with not much more effort than changing brakes.

    35. Re:Until... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wikipedia says "Electric vehicles can also use a direct motor-to-wheel configuration which increases the amount of available power. Having multiple motors connected directly to the wheels allows for each of the wheels to be used for both propulsion and as braking systems, thereby increasing traction. In some cases, the motor can be housed directly in the wheel, such as in the Whispering Wheel design, which lowers the vehicle's center of gravity and reduces the number of moving parts. When not fitted with an axle, differential, or transmission, electric vehicles have less drivetrain rotational inertia."

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    36. Re:Until... by AaronW · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually asked a fellow I know who works at Tesla about wheel motors. He basically said it's a bad idea from a performance and handling point of view. The additional weight in the wheels makes the suspension less effective and means that the effect of going over a bump will be a lot harsher. Besides, he said it also would add a lot to the cost since now instead of one motor you need two or four, as well as two or four inverters and a lot more complicated control software. This also would add more weight since each motor needs its own set of magnets and housing. Cooling can also be a problem. It's much cheaper to just use a differential and axles which typically have very little loss with the advantage that the weight is shifted to the car body. It also makes it easy to do things like water cooling for the motor. I suppose one could still use multiple motors located in the body and use axles to get rid of all of the mass in the wheels, but it still adds a lot of unnecessary complexity to the control system and additional cost and less reliability.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    37. Re:Until... by mozumder · · Score: 1

      the lawsuit mentioned on the blog did not prevent development of NiMH batteries as claimed. it restricted sales in north america only and only till 2007 or 2010.

      Thanks. That's exactly what we needed to know.

    38. Re:Until... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      OMG, have you just used the Chewbacca Defense?

    39. Re:Until... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative

      sometime in the 90's all the issues of timing, etc started becoming fairly mundane tasks for motion controllers. Today anyone can buy motor controllers from hobby stores that can maintain pretty tight torque specifications. My RC plane has a less than $100 VFD drive controller in it capable of pretty good torque control, and weighing a few ounces (we did a first robotics project using these for a skid steered bot.)
      For higher HP I have purchased motion controllers from automation direct for a few grand that can be setup in a torque following configuration (and controlled over a communications buss with 100ms response times.)
      Now packing in 4 separate VFD drives (assuming these are AC) along with all the other needed wiring is going to eat up alott of space. Going DC would be easier, the DC drive trucks I worked with just wired the motors in series, that kept torque fairly well balanced.
      Actually the IGBT electric drive vehicles have much better traction control than mechanical drive, because they can change their response a few hundred times a second if needed, measuring acceleration responses to precisely measured torques (just measure the current.)

    40. Re:Until... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      That is interesting, because it seems like that's exactly what traction control systems do, and specifically under highly dynamic handling conditions to boot.

    41. Re:Until... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Anytime the words "paradigm shift" appear in an article (like the one you linked) alarm bells start going off.

    42. Re:Until... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Except, IIRC, the conspirators weren't (at least publicly) known until they SAID they did it.

      So it wasn't a conspiracy theory, it was proven.

    43. Re:Until... by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      No small part of the unsprung weight is the brake structure and at least part of the weight of the drive shaft. An in-wheel motor serves both as drive and brake. Putting 4 motors in means you get to make each motor smaller to provide the same power. Further, the transmission losses of a current drivetrain (both in the transmission itself and in the u-joints of the drive shaft) are greatly minimized if not eliminated altogether allowing a further reduction in motor size.

      I have no idea how this all adds up in terms of unsprung weight, but I suspect it may be close to a wash. But that's only a guess and I'm too lazy to do the research on it.

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    44. Re:Until... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      What happens when you bounce that thing off a Michigan pothole at 55mph? I'm guessing damned expensive repair job.

    45. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, so you linked to a blog. I read it. I still don't know if they have the patent that covers all NiMH batteries (I'm using one right now on my laptop) and the only facts int he article are that Chevron had a patent for something, and that they got $20m USD in licensing fees and that toyota shut down the battery production line. It doesn't happen to mention anything about continuing licensing, or anything. It sounds pretty trollish to me, but then I don't have an agenda.

    46. Re:Until... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      nice tin foil hat.

      Here's a real world example http://greentransportandenergy.blogspot.com/2009/03/great-importance-of-wheel-motors.html
       
      They had a working prototype, they approached Detroit to get their making-cars expertise... and the project gets quickly scrapped for no apparent reason.

       
      The problem being - your link fails to support your claim. It explains how wonderful the invention could be, but doesn't mention Detroit at all.

    47. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >or find a way to place the suspension within the wheel assembly itself

      Huh?

    48. Re:Until... by malkir · · Score: 1

      If you get a flat I hope you have another few-thousand-dollar-already-charged wheel as a spare. These cars would end up on cinderblocks anywhere but a private garage.

    49. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    50. Re:Until... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Electric motors are very inefficient as slow speeds.

      If they are, they appear to have solved that problem for trams, trains & delivery vans.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:Until... by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      Ferrari has had some experience dealing with the weight problem with their KERS system this year. I'm guessing the hybrid will be taking a lot of lessons learned from the F1 team...

    52. Re:Until... by Denial93 · · Score: 1

      The additional weight in the wheels makes the suspension less effective and means that the effect of going over a bump will be a lot harsher.

      Yeah, I go over bumps all the time. They're on every street, particularly on highways, and in the city especially, it would be impossible to drive without strong suspension!

      Where's my sarcasm tag?

    53. Re:Until... by cailith1970 · · Score: 1

      Obviously they have *their* tin foil hats on ;)

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
    54. Re:Until... by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until who said they did it? The conspiracy theorists? The conspirators are dead, Usama bin Laden (or someone else) may and may not have said something on some poor recordings.

      Proof? No.

      All we have is coincidence: it wouldn't make sense that two passenger planes crashed into TWC the same day if it wasn't somehow orchestrated. A conspiracy. The rest is simply pattern matching.

      Proof? You don't know what the word means.

    55. Re:Until... by maxume · · Score: 1
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    56. Re:Until... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We don't use wheel motors because it increases unsprung mass, which is far more important than rotational inertia, especially since some of the transmissions used in hybrids in particular (closest to full-EVs) are CVTs which happen to have lower rotational inertia due to their basic design (See: the Honda CVT.) Using CVs from inboard motors, you can still eliminate the transmission and gain most of the benefits of wheel motors without any of the drawbacks.

      The big problem with unsprung mass is wheel return. The spring has a certain rate, measured with weight and distance. For example, I had some 250 lb/inch springs on my 240SX stock, and replaced them with 550 lb/in in the front, and 500 in the rear. The higher the spring rate, the faster the wheel returns to the extended position. The higher the mass at the wheel, the higher the spring rate has to be to return the wheel in the same amount of time. The higher the spring rate, the bumpier the ride (and all else equal, the heavier the spring.) If you have a wheel motor, then given the same spring rate, the wheel spends less time on the ground; every time the ground drops away underneath it you lose traction, every time you go over a bump the wheel is forced up, and you lose traction. The spring pushes the suspension back down and gets your traction back.

      Or, short form, wheel motors cause shitty handling. We use them only when this doesn't matter.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Global Warming is a farce anyways. In case you haven't noticed, we're freezing our arses off here in the one of the coldest Octobers since the 1800's. Seem to remember the whole summer being pretty cool and Al Gore spent most of it with his Pie-hole shut. . . Guess it wasn't hot enough to emphasize his point....or maybe that was why it was cooler?

      Not that it matters. We're just going to further cripple this country by forcing people to use "green" technology that predominantly isn't cost effective without government subsidies...which either means that a) joe citizen gets taxed more or b) China will continue to financially own this country as they buy our unsecured debt. . .

      Yeah, we're screwed.

    58. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth can you prove that something doesn't happen?

      Grow up.

    59. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, IIRC, the conspirators weren't (at least publicly) known until they SAID they did it.

      Wait a second, I thought they all died?

    60. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michelins Active Wheel is one example of a wheel with both electric motors and suspension inside the wheel.

      Essentially the whole drivetrain in the wheel.

    61. Re:Until... by TastyCakes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some interesting points, but I think some of them need some perspective:
      1. Exxon "owns" 1% of the world's reserves and produces only 3% of the world's oil. Astonishing as it may seem, they are really bit players compared to the big national oil companies. Even if they wanted to, Exxon couldn't have lowered the price of oil in the market overall. As far as showing interest in green energy, my opinion is that it's their choice on what they want to support, what they consider a good investment for their money. Many oil companies (most notably Shell, Chevron and BP) made a big deal about their investments in "green energy", but if you actually look at it most people come to the conclusion it's just greenwashing. Would you rather Exxon tried to deflect criticism similarly, or that they stick to reality: they are an oil company, their competitive advantage in the world is producing oil and that is what they should continue do, in the interest of their stake holders and everyone that uses oil and gas products?
      2. See point 1. regarding green energy. Regarding OPEC, I'm not sure that means what you think it means.
      3. This looks like an internal squabble between gas stations and their franchise owner. I'm sure this sort of thing happens to companies all the time, and I'm sure Exxon and its lawyers will sort it out correctly.
      4. and 5. I don't believe Exxon executives are convinced global warming is actually caused by the burning of fossil fuels. And they're certainly not alone in that, and they certainly have more motivation to be skeptical than any other private company in the world. That said, I agree that their efforts to spread their skepticism were clumsy and in some cases not particularly honest.
      6. That does not seem to be what the article you link says. It says that Exxon told its service stations not to use MTBE in areas where their are drinking water wells. The service stations used it in some of those areas anyway. Those areas are found to have MTBE contamination. Exxon says that, while their stations used MTBE, that they were not the source of the contamination (or at least not all of it) and they shouldn't have to pay to clean up other peoples' mess just because they have the deepest pockets.
      7. and 8. Big business make campaign contributions to friendly American politicians all the time. It's unfortunate for democracy, I agree, but you I don't see how you can take big oil to task without looking at all the others: pharmaceuticals, agriculture, manufacturing and so on.

    62. Re:Until... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      as a engineer having worked on mining trucks for 12years with wheel motors

      The you're the guy to ask...

      electric motors are generally very in-efficient at high torque

      I thought that trains used electric motors powered by diesel generators rather than using diesels alone because electric motors had enough torque to pull a train, while the diesel didn't?

      Could you enlighten me?

    63. Re:Until... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The additional weight in the wheels makes the suspension less effective

      Indeed, that's why they make alumanum and alloy wheels. The car I'm driving now has sixteen inch alloy wheels, and it handles better than any car I've owned. Put some big motors in them and the advantage goes away.

      It seems you could have a single electric motor tied to the wheels with conventional drivetrains and still have regenerative braking, similar to old fashioned cars with stick shifts; you would downshift and have "engine braking". The difference is, with an electric motor you could reclaim some of the kinetic energy.

    64. Re:Until... by mi · · Score: 2, Funny

      They have the monopoly among many others in the OPEC conglomerate.

      Libertine, do you know, what monopoly means? Hint: there can be no "many others"...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    65. Re:Until... by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Informative

      As both an Navy Electrician's Mate (We work on electric motors and electrical distribution on ships) and now an Electrical Engineering major, I can say that electric motors are commonly used in high-load applications because they are efficient at high speeds and low torque.

      A diesel-electric train likely runs the electric motor at high speeds (1200+ rpm) and uses a gearing system for the necessary torque. Using the wheel of a vehicle as the rotor naturally precludes this option, and is therefore a terrible solution.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    66. Re:Until... by mi · · Score: 1

      Exxon buys them out, or lobbies against the tech and throws campaign money to the folks that make the municipal decisions, as big oil does with everything else progressive that possibly endangers their energy monopoly.

      Yes, we would've been completely energy-independent by now, if only Rethuglikkkans and their Big Oil pals invested in the Perpetual Motion research!..

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    67. Re:Until... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      There's a small problem with those... unstrung weight is really bad for handling, braking, and ride quality.

      I don't know what unstrung weight refers to in cars....but as far as that prototype I linked about, it had a computer controlling the 4 wheel motors, which was really good for handling, braking, accelerating and ride quality.

      I was imagining a girlfriend PMSing in the passenger seat. But this is /. so you could substitute "sister" or "platonic friend" instead. As for the unsprung weight, if you could do without brakes and let the motors do that -- that's a big IF -- then you could mitigate the extra weight a little. For that matter, if you could get a motor about the same weight as a half-shaft, wouldn't that also be a wash?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    68. Re:Until... by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Electric motors are very inefficient as slow speeds.

      If they are, they appear to have solved that problem for trams, trains & delivery vans.

      No they haven't solved the inefficiency, nor would it stop a motor from being used for the examples you cited. Usage doesn't really change the fact that electric motors are far less efficient at very slow speeds. http://www.4p8.com/eric.brasseur/emamem.html. Electric motors are most efficient when designed for and operated at a fixed speed and load.

    69. Re:Until... by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, because they were only able to block the batteries from one of the largest markets during a critical phase of market development rather than completely kill them it means they are made of sunshine and lolipops?

      If they were just a battery division trying to make money, they'd do what any other seller does when the entire market says "no thanks", they'd lower their asking price until someone buys. That is particularly true when the entire 'cost of production' is already sunk and there is no marginal cost (such as the case for all IP). Alternatively, if they were a real battery division, they'd go into production themselves.

    70. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he was referring to OPEC's monopoly, smart-ass, not just Exxon's.

    71. Re:Until... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which of those numbers demonstrates the company squashing a technology that would solve our energy problems?

      1. The company made a profit during a recession? Well hell, that's the last thing we need anyone doing for our economy during a recession. How are we ever going to get out of a recession if these companies keep trying to make money ?!

      2.I don't recall the mandate that every company be required to have a green energy division. Exxon is not your keeper or steward, their not responsible for looking out for your best interests. They're a company, their job is to sell a product and make money. How much money has Red Hat and Apple put into researching bio-fuels and wind farms? What companies are required to do so in order to not be considered evil?

      3. I don't even know how this is even remotely related. It's dealing with a complaint that Exxon isn't providing the correct amount of discount for customers paying with cash versus using a credit card. What does cash vs credit card discounts have to do with squashing green energy technology/progress?

      4. Exxon offers money to scientists to research and find problems with research about a topic that affects their business. Whoopdeefuckingdoo.

      5. Now Exxon agreeing with you about global warming makes them evil, when them disagreeing with you made them evil before. I'm sure if they were 'neutral' on the matter they would be evilly standing by while the world suffered as well.

      6. Exxon Mobile is successfully fined millions of dollars by the City of New York in a trial after they broke a law.

      Bad thing for a company to do? yes
      Demonstrative of squashing a green technology? No
      Demonstrative of ability to get local officials in their back pockets to avoid things they don't want? Exactly the opposite

      7&8. companies contribute campaign money. OK, this is kind of broad, a lot of companies do, care to elaborate which of these campaign contributions stopped all this federally funded green technology research that's going on?

      7 version 2: They've changed their minds on the global warming issues to please politicians so politicians can please us? So.....their listening to our concerns and wants because their interested in making money? Sounds like a good thing for us.

    72. Re:Until... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Now, if I can find a way to hook up a supercharged Chevy 350 directly to each wheel...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    73. Re:Until... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What if they made the road act like a suspension piece and flex and move instead of the wheels and parts touching it?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    74. Re:Until... by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      That would end up doing pretty much the same thing as a pnuematic tire. I know on haulpaks (those massive mining trucks), the only suspension is the tire, so you could probably work out something similar to that.

      That said, the early days of automotive designs had all sorts of whacky concepts, so someone probably tried that and failed. Not to say of course that with a little engineering you couldn't try and succeed.

    75. Re:Until... by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      They also handle like crap to begin with, so the extra unsprung weight isn't really noticeable.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    76. Re:Until... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You would have a tractor ready to compete in the next pull?

      Better not bring those mice though. Rats are the standard.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    77. Re:Until... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Was thinking of the unsprung weight.

      Also, I can move a 350 by hand around the shop but my 454, that mutha's heavy!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    78. Re:Until... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Brakes are light and you will still need them for panic stops.

      I know of no electric car that uses _only_ regenerative braking.

      Electric motors are heavy. When was the last time you picked up a 10 horse electric motor?

      Jaguar used to put their brakes just outboard of the differentials to reduce unsprung weight. Maintenance nightmare.

      It's not even close to a wash. This idea died of natural causes as it does every time it comes up.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    79. Re:Until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you've just proposed an engineering problem more complex and expensive than alternative energy.

    80. Re:Until... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There are no points to refute.
      he list some facts, The spouts off about something with no proof.

      Typical conspiracy nonsense.

      Add to that the fact I can get NiMH it seems even less likely this is true.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    81. Re:Until... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      I agree with biryokumaru. FYI The diesel's output shaft peak torque is way higher than the electric drives peak output shaft torque.
      IMHO the major advantages are:
          1) infinite number of gear ratios can keep the engine in peak efficiency without needing a separate gear for every possible sustained speed. Major advantage for emissions, you don't have to ever lug a engine to make up for a non-ideal gear ratio. You can avoid spending any time at a poor pollution engine speed/load combination.
          2) traction control is a huge deal on locomotive (poor traction for metal on metal also low percentage of total loaded weight on drive axles), electric drive can instantly change torques independently to each motor, Capacitors average this out to the engine.
          3) braking, you can use the wheel motors to dump lots of energy to a fairly simple device (super-sized hair dryer like metal strips and a cooling fan) That does not wear out like all other simple braking devices. Also traction control on braking is better performance than most ABS systems.
          4) one to many transmission, it is simpler to split power equally from 1 source to 8 motors with electric.

    82. Re:Until... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      When speaking of cons[piracy theories, most people, whether they know it or not, are talking about global conspiracy.
      9/11 is a great example how a stupidly large number of people would need to be involved in orre for it to work.
      Are there conspiracy? sure, but they involve a few people. Larger one tend to get found out much quicker.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    83. Re:Until... by flibbajobber · · Score: 1

      I thought that trains used electric motors powered by diesel generators rather than using diesels alone because electric motors had enough torque to pull a train, while the diesel didn't?

      Short answer is electric motors have torque from 0rpm whereas a diesel engine alone can't operate from 0rpm so needs some sort of clutch or slip system. All weighed up, the diesel-electric approach comes out ahead of other mechanisms.

    84. Re:Until... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The documentation they kept along with the testimony of the guy that didn't go.

      "The rest is simply pattern matching."

      Clearly you don't understand Logic and proof.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    85. Re:Until... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sure there can. Not saying it applies in this case, but one can have a monopoly in one district while someone else has a monopoly in the same area next district over. See how the phone company does it.

      Here I think it's just being used as a scare word, and because oligopoly doesn't sound quite as evil. (And it usually isn't quite as evil...because someone's likely to break ranks if it will help their business.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    86. Re:Until... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Some of his points sound like they could be reasonable. Others sound like he's just dismissed the concept is is coming up with justifiers. (I.e., I think that *I* can see ways to answer his objections.) This makes me skeptical about the rest of his answers.

      To be explicit, consider the claim that you now need two to four inverters. There exist such things as DC electric motors, and they are no heavier or more expensive than AC motors. That gets rid of the need for ANY inverters except to use with attached gadgets. And I think that in cars those are already designed to operate on DC. So no inverters needed at all.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    87. Re:Until... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Obviously you know nothing of logic and proof either, if you think documentation and testimony counts as proof, in logical terms. It doesn't. It's evidence, not proof.

      Stop being so uppity when you don't know what you're talking about.

    88. Re:Until... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      How do you know?

      I suspect that people don't really think about what conspiracy means. If they did, they would realize that conspiracies are quite common. Certain conspiracies get denounced by public authorities, and everyone believes that "these are the conspirators", but that's only a very small subset of the conspiracies that exist. Some conspiracies plot to subvert legislation. (Define subvert how you will.) Usually those conspiracies don't use force or threat, but instead greed, or some such. Occasionally they use "patriotism" (under one definition or another) as a tool. They are goups of people who organize together (i.e. conspiracy from con spiro, Latin, breathe together) to accomplish a goal. In common speech this is restricted to groups who are secretive and act in defiance of the existing law. Bribing politicians is such an act. So is organizing a Ponzi scheme. But the requirement that it be illegal is a recent addition.

      Did you realize that in many state conspiracy to jaywalk is a felony? This makes any kid who's ever played Chicken a felon (probably uncharged and unconvicted, but a felon, nonetheless).

      Note that any kids club where they hide what they're doing from the adults is, by any reasonable reading of the term, a conspiracy. Don't say that they are uncommon.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    89. Re:Until... by AaronW · · Score: 1

      Controlling DC motors for electric vehicles is still a complex operation, even if it is simpler than AC motors (depends on the type of DC motor). They are also typically less efficient unless one goes for a brushless motor, which is expensive since it requires a large permanent magnet. The brushes also wear out over time. They also generate a lot more EMI and are not as efficient. They also generally aren't that great at regenerative braking compared to an AC motor. AC motors work quite well in this respect. Controlling the speed of an AC motor is much simpler since it is simply a matter of the AC frequency.

      There are many reasons not to put the motors in the wheels. For one, there's not much space for gear reduction in the wheels. Low speed electric motors are typically much less efficient. Two, there's the extra mass in the wheels which causes a lot of handling issues. Think of going over bumps, where now you add all this extra mass to the wheel. This puts a lot more stress on the tire and all the extra inertia will have a negative impact. There's a reason for alloy wheels other than just looks. Third, keeping dirt and water out of the motors is more complex, particularly if they're air cooled. This is much less of a problem if the motor is located in the body of the vehicle. If water cooled then one must run coolant hoses to the wheels. It's just a lot cheaper and easier to use axles to provide power to the wheels with a single motor and differential. A differential works quite well without any complex control mechanisms to try and distribute the power evenly.

      DC motors are typically used by DIY electric vehicle builders, but commercial builders typically opt for AC.

      http://www.electric-cars-are-for-girls.com/electric-car-motors-ac-vs-dc.html

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_motor#Comparison_of_motor_types

      http://ezinearticles.com/?Electric-Vehicle-Motor-For-Conversion---DC-Motor-Or-AC-Motor&id=2892806

      http://www.zeva.com.au/tech.php?section=motors

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    90. Re:Until... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You do realise that the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks is a conspiracy theory, don't you? Atta et al = conspirators.

      No - you simply do not understand the meaning of the phrase "conspiracy theory". Allow me to enlighten you:

      Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any conspiracy claim. However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by usually powerful Machiavellian conspirators.[1]
      ...

      In the United States of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, conspiracy theories have become commonplace in mass media, and "evidence suggests that a broad cross section of Americans todaygives credence to at least some conspiracy theories."[4] This has contributed to conspiracism emerging as a cultural phenomenon and the possible replacement of democracy by conspiracy as the dominant paradigm of political action in the public mind. Belief in conspiracy theories has therefore become a topic of interest for sociologists, psychologists and experts in folklore.[5]

      Source here.

      Conspiracy theorists like to try and legitimize their personal delusions by claiming that the factually supported narratives are also conspiracy theories. This is, of course, foolish. It's a silly sort of wordplay whose sole purpose is to mislead the naive.

    91. Re:Until... by BranMan · · Score: 1

      There's 2 more potential bad things that can happen with wheel motors that I can think of:

      1) Your chance of a failure has quadrupled - since you have 4 engines instead of 1, and if any one fails, your car is dead / undriveable until you have it repaired / replaced.

      2) If one of those 4 motors fails / seizes up - ever - at highway speeds, YOU'RE dead (and the car is too).

            The other problems with higher wheel weight - much higher, say it's 200 lb / wheel with a motor instead of 50 lb without - is not just that the ride is harsher. When that much weight hits a bump or a pothole, it's going to move up or down accordingly. That's a lot of weight moving in a direction you do not want it to go, and the only things that counter that are the suspension and the mass of the whole vehicle. The suspension moves the wheel back where it needs to go, and moves the car in the opposite direction. When the weight of a wheel becomes large relative to the car (say if the wheel is 200 lb and the car is 2000 lb), then the car can become airborne when you hit a bump at speed. And while that wheel, or wheels, are airborne you have zilch - no acceleration, no braking, no steering, no control. And bad things can happen.

            No wonder after talking it over with some real car guys they quietly dropped it.

    92. Re:Until... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      If by "silly sort of wordplay whose sole purpose is to mislead the naive" you mean using words in accordance with their actual meaning, then I guess you've got a point. My purpose is certainly not to "legitimize [my] personal delusions", though, as I fully believe Atta & Co were responsible, so you're obviously just a simpleton who can't argue without using the ad hominem. Now please go fuck yourself.

    93. Re:Until... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      If by "silly sort of wordplay whose sole purpose is to mislead the naive" you mean using words in accordance with their actual meaning, then I guess you've got a point.

      Ok, then I guess you have no problem with being called a gay/queer man who likes to bum fags.

      What do you mean you're offended? You certainly seem like a happy and quirky individual. Your habit of borrowing cigarettes might be a point of dispute, but it's certainly nothing to get uppity about ...

      My purpose is certainly not to "legitimize [my] personal delusions", though, as I fully believe Atta & Co were responsible, so you're obviously just a simpleton who can't argue without using the ad hominem.

      So you're just a twit who doesn't really comprehend the nuances of the English language. Not only do you not realize that words and phrases can have different meanings depending on how they're used, but the meaning of "ad hominen" seems to have completely eluded you. No biggie. I'd be more than happy to tutor you, so long as you remain civil.

      Now please go fuck yourself.

      .... well so much for that.

    94. Re:Until... by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Nah, I know perfectly well what an ad hominem is. When you try to smear me with the 'conspiracy theorist' label, then that's a textbook ad hominem: you even make it out to be the character flaw that makes people point out that some conspiracy theories are, in fact, mainstream. That's what an ad hominem is.

      Of course, it's a strawman as well.

      And knowing what words mean instead of only how to use them in moronic conversation is hardly a failure to "comprehend the nuances of the English language". Within context (hey, look at my original comment up there), it's actually pertinent to remind the guy what his words mean.

    95. Re:Until... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      When you try to smear me with the 'conspiracy theorist' label, then that's a textbook ad hominem: you even make it out to be the character flaw that makes people point out that some conspiracy theories are, in fact, mainstream. That's what an ad hominem is.

      Nope.

      An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the person" or "argument against the person") is an argument which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of a person advocating the premise[1]. [emphasis mine]

      To dumb it down for you: in order for a comment to be an ad-hominem attack, it must be used as the basis for the dismissal of a dissenting viewpoint/argument. Here's an example:

      "Only morons think that grass is purple"
        - ad hominem

      "Grass isn't purple, here's a spectroscopic analysis, and, by the way, you're a moron"
        - not ad hominem

      There, now you can say you learned something new today!

      Of course, it's a strawman as well.

      Oh boy. I'd LOVE to see your definition of that one! Let me guess - you think a strawman is something along the lines of "when you're a big meanie who disagrees with me!"

      And knowing what words mean instead of only how to use them in moronic conversation is hardly a failure to "comprehend the nuances of the English language".

      Ah, see, now THERE is an actual logical fallacy - a false dichotomy! You're suggesting that there are only two categories which people can fall into when it comes to English comprehension:

      1. Knowing what words mean.
      2. Only knowing how to make moronic conversation.

      In fact, there are multiple other possibilities, such as:

      3. Knowing what words mean, AND how to make moronic conversation.
      4. Not knowing either what words mean or how to engage in moronic conversation.
      5. Knowing what words mean, and being able to apply them in any conversation.
      6. .... well, you get the drift.

      Of course, you clearly fall into category 2, anyway: you only understand one specific definition for a handful of words without understanding their proper usage, but are more than happy to get in moronic discussions (and START them, too!).

      You rather remind me of a trained monkey; you hear the word "banana" ... your ears perk up ... you get all excited ... the Pavlovian response kicks in and you start to salivate ... and then start screaming and throwing feces because, sadly, it turns out the lab assistants were discussing the upcoming sale at Banana Republic.

      And no, that was neither an ad-hominem, a straw-man, or any other sort of logical fallacy. It was, rather, an apt summation of your verbal/literary shortcomings. So, before you start formulating another gormless response, consider the phrase "Banana Republic", and then tell me what kind of definition you come up with by relying on your much-vaunted "knowing what words mean" method.

    96. Re:Until... by iamangry · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a successful business to me. Understand that while all you environmentalists gripe about "green energy this" and "conspiracy theory that", ExxonMobil continues to do what a good American company should do: make money and pay taxes to the US Government. They paid roughly a sixth of the US defense budget in 2008 (something like 116 bn in taxes.. that's right, the US government made twice the money off of "exploiting the people" that ExxonMobil stock holders did). They're a business, they exist to make profit. Shame on you for expecting them to blindly cooperate with your vision of the future just because you and people like you will it. Especially when they have been researching new energy sources for automobiles and collaborating with Toyota on new engine technologies.

      You live in America. Profit is a good thing, not obscene.

  4. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...bus ultra-charges you!

  5. Isn't this the same as a trolley? by srothroc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aren't these, in the end, pretty much the same as a trolley? The bus is really a mini-bus that holds 11 people. It uses 40% as much electricity as a trolley. If you expanded the bus to hold as many people as a trolley can, wouldn't the increase in size and weight (both bus weight and passenger weight) make it use more energy?

    If so, then what's the difference between this and, say, a mini-trolley? I mean, hell, why not ultracapacitor golf carts or something?

    1. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We have trams (light rail) here in Melbourne. Maybe if you ran the numbers you could take away the overhead cables from most of the network and just charge the trams at stops and intersections. Might be cheaper overall that way.

    2. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by quanticle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The advantage with a bus is that its much easier to add new stops and routes. You only have to build up the charging station, whereas with a trolley, one has to tear up the road, put in tracks, and build stations.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    3. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Aren't these, in the end, pretty much the same as a trolley? The bus is really a mini-bus that holds 11 people. It uses 40% as much electricity as a trolley. If you expanded the bus to hold as many people as a trolley can, wouldn't the increase in size and weight (both bus weight and passenger weight) make it use more energy?

      If so, then what's the difference between this and, say, a mini-trolley? I mean, hell, why not ultracapacitor golf carts or something?

      Removes the moving-part-inefficiency, disruption, inconvenience, installation cost, maintenance cost, and unsightliness of overhead wires. I'm guessing that these charging ports would be cheaper to install and maintain.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    4. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by JohnyDog · · Score: 1

      The advantage with a bus is that its much easier to add new stops and routes. You only have to build up the charging station, whereas with a trolley, one has to tear up the road, put in tracks, and build stations.

      Maybe trolleybus then?

      --
      People who like this sort of sig will find this the sort of sig they like.
    5. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by PPalmgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, rails and cables don't make sense for a stop that will enver see more than 10 passengers in the outskirts of a city. The economics allow these buses better scalability. This would be nice in the US where suberbia reigns supreme. The only form of mass transit that really works in a city with low land value like mine is buses, because the houses are so spread out.

    6. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by quanticle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, this still has the issue of having to build (electricity) lines over the entire route. Here, you can localize the charging to only the bus stops, which reduces the infrastructure costs of getting the system going.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    7. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      A bus can drive anywhere. A trolley (as in a real trolley) draws its power continuously from wires. Thus it can only follow predefined routes that require extensive (and expensive and dangerous) infrastructure. This type of fast-charging capacitor system is sort of like a hybrid combining the best features of autonomous buses and externally powered trolleys.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    8. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by sanyacid · · Score: 1

      I believe OP was referring to trolleybuses. Trams need rail tracks to be built into the road, but trolleybus is just like a normal bus on rubber tires, except that it uses electricity as a power source and constant connection to power line is required. There is no need to tear up the road for trolleybuses, but the power line must be built.

      The advantage ultracapasitor bus has over trolleybus is that it can drive further away (as far as capacitor allows) from it's normal route than trolleybus.

    9. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's both an advantage and a disadvantage, though. It's not only easier to add stops and routes, but to change or remove them. That makes the value of the transit to property owners considerably less--- someone might put up a condo building next to a metro station, confident that the station will be there for decades, but nobody is going to bank on a bus line.

    10. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by moosesocks · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This paradoxically works out in favor of the trolley lines, given that they tend to attract economic development to them. Bus routes don't do the same, given that they (as you mentioned) tend to be ephemeral. The permanence of a trolley line also greatly helps with rider usability, as users don't have to keep up with route changes.

      Streetcars also don't tend to have "stations" as much as they have an area designated for them to stop where the curb happens to be flat and level. (Many bus stops are also now being built in this fashion)

      Portland, OR claims that its streetcar line has spurred billions of dollars of investment in the area surrounding it in a very short period of time.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    11. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Apparently that's what a Chinese bus normally is - lots of little busses at short intervals instead of the usual western thing of big busses at longer intervals.
      Little trams (trolleys?) would work well too in that the pollution is shifted away to scrubbers/precipitators/filters and a big tall stack miles away instead of at street level where people are breathing it in.

    12. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      This paradoxically works out in favor of the trolley lines, given that they tend to attract economic development to them.

      Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong but I look at it as saying the use of trolleys attracts economic development like the parable of the broken window, by breaking a window glass you're creating work for the glass maker. However in reality breaking the glass only diverts money when it can be used for a better purpose. Instead of the kid getting the shoes he needs the money is now spent on glass.

      It also sounds like the line that using tax money to pay for a new sports stadium brings in new revenue for the area. Not one economic study I've heard of concludes this is true. Some conclude any benefit is smaller than what was advertised. Others conclude there is no benefit at all.

      Portland, OR claims that its streetcar line has spurred billions of dollars of investment in the area surrounding it in a very short period of time.

      They may claim it but do the numbers support that? Or is it a broken window parable?

      Falcon

      Oh, mind you I'm not arguing against improving mass transit, I support doing it, but I'd like to see the numbers crunched. It's easy to be over optimistic when you're not spending your own money.

    13. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by quanticle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps I'm looking at it wrong but I look at it as saying the use of trolleys attracts economic development like the parable of the broken window, by breaking a window glass you're creating work for the glass maker. However in reality breaking the glass only diverts money when it can be used for a better purpose. Instead of the kid getting the shoes he needs the money is now spent on glass.

      That's not exactly true. The economic development argument states that the presence of a streetcar line increases foot traffic in that area, which tends to increase the customer base for local businesses. Its a small scale version of the argument that justifies the presence of highways. By making transportation easier (via infrastructure improvements) the government allows commerce to flow more quickly and cheaply, increasing economic activity by reducing transaction costs.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    14. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by quanticle · · Score: 1

      The big advantage in favor of buses in my opinion is their "backwards compatibility". A new bus line doesn't destroy the road for other vehicles. A trolley/streetcar line reduces the vehicle capacity of the road it travels along. Now, some consider that a good thing, since it forces people to use mass transit rather than drive. My concern is that, if driving is sufficiently difficult suburban dwellers (like me) will choose to stop going downtown rather than put up with the inconvenience of massively crowded streets.

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    15. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      My dad pointed out to me once that, at least originally, "trolley" referred to just the device at the top of a streetcar that provides the electrical junction between the overhead power lines and the car.

    16. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      One of the potential uses for super-capacitor vehicles is in trolley buses. They run off the overhead lines but can also easily make detours and re-attach to the line if necessary. Exclusively super-capacitor buses provide an extra possibility in the family.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    17. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      I would think the argument could be made as well that, as in Chicago, mass transit attracts crime because the criminals know there will be people there to rob. It also attracts taggers because they know there be something to spraypaint. Does wonders for the stores along the line selling nylons, ski masks and spraypaint cans.

      So far the new light rail in Phoenix and Tempe seems to be bearing this idea out.

    18. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      I think we're muddling issues here.

      Also, the Arizona light rail projects seem to reek of Pork-barrel spending. I can't personally attest to the areas in which the rail lines were built, although the areas of Phoenix that I have seen don't have anywhere remotely near the density necessary to justify a trolley line. It's got a tiny urban center with a whole lot of sprawl surrounding it.

      Phoenix also has virtually no other public transportation in use -- only 3% use it on their commute. Any new investment is going to be of extremely little use, until the rest of the system catches up.

      You can't just throw tracks in the street, and expect a miracle. Portland already had a fairly extensive public transit network prior to the construction of the streetcar in other areas of the city, and a culture that supported public transportation. Cities much smaller than Phoenix (ie. Boston) can easily justify extensive heavy-rail-based transportation networks thanks to the densely-packed city plan. I can think of a dozen small cities that would be more suited to a trolley line than Phoenix... Richmond, VA comes to mind as an ideal candidate.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    19. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by PFAK · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but in Vancouver no roads were torn up to put in tracks or stations built. Our trolley system relies on overhead wires which caused minimal disruption when installation was done and no modification to existing roadways.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    20. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Living in an area with trolleys, they have two main disadvantages:
      1. Route changes are a PITA, traffic can be a mess in Helsinki for ages when they lay the tracks.
      2. It only takes a single broke down car to mess things up. I trolley can't simply use the other lane to get around an obstacle.

      The whole supercapacitor bus thing would work great in Helsinki, IMHO, since they already have trolley electrical infrastructure here.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    21. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by xaxa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A trolley/streetcar line reduces the vehicle capacity of the road it travels along.

      How? You can pave the area around the tracks.

      if driving is sufficiently difficult suburban dwellers (like me) will choose to stop going downtown rather than put up with the inconvenience of massively crowded streets.

      The city dwellers already have streets crowded with your cars. Every extra person in a tram (rather than their own car) is more road space for you!

    22. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Dangerous? Man, how tall are you?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your error is thinking that there is a fixed supply of money. Think of it this way, when the stock market rises wealth (or simply money if you prefer) is just created out of thin air. In short economics is not a zero sum game. Sometimes everybody wins (or loses which seems to be the problem currently).

    24. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dangerous? Man, how high are you?

      TFTFY

      As a kite!

    25. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't these, in the end, pretty much the same as a trolley? The bus is really a mini-bus that holds 11 people. It uses 40% as much electricity as a trolley. If you expanded the bus to hold as many people as a trolley can, wouldn't the increase in size and weight (both bus weight and passenger weight) make it use more energy?

      If so, then what's the difference between this and, say, a mini-trolley? I mean, hell, why not ultracapacitor golf carts or something?

      The 40% savings mentioned in the article is comparing the full sized ultracapacitor buses running in Shanghai for the last 3 years and electric trolley buses.

    26. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You probably don't even need it for every stop. It could likely get by with one charging station every couple of miles, except in very hilly terrain. I suppose it depends on how expensive the capacitors are.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    27. Re:Isn't this the same as a trolley? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true. The economic development argument states that the presence of a streetcar line increases foot traffic in that area, which tends to increase the customer base for local businesses.

      But it reduces foot traffic in other areas, or are you saying there is more foot traffic everywhere?

      By making transportation easier (via infrastructure improvements) the government allows commerce to flow more quickly and cheaply, increasing economic activity by reducing transaction costs.

      Actually economic activity is increased by allowing trade between the different areas. No one area can produce everything residents in the area may need or want. Take oranges, oranges grown in California or Florida can be shipped all over the country, to where oranges will not grow. Georgia peaches are also shipped all over the country. The same with other produce. Or take copper, Arizona is a major producer of copper in the US. Without trade between different regions and states some states would lack some supplies. The same applies internationally.

      Falcon

  6. No, thanks by willoughby · · Score: 4, Funny

    The cap's are under the seats?! Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a cab, thank you.

    1. Re:No, thanks by santiago · · Score: 5, Funny

      The gasoline-filled tank is under the seats? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a pennyfarthing, thank you.

    2. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gasoline-filled tank is under the seats? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a pennyfarthing, thank you.

      Except for the fact that its much harder to ignite gasoline then to overload an electrical system.

    3. Re:No, thanks by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Springs and the support post are under the seat? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a horse, thank you.

    4. Re:No, thanks by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Today's XKCD is extremely topical:
       
      http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/bag_check.png

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re:No, thanks by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The cap's are under the seats?! Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a cab, thank you.

      "You can't get people to sit over an explosion."

      --Colonel Albert A. Pope, 1890s bicycle and electric car mogul, on the newly introduced internal combustion engines.

    6. Re:No, thanks by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sharp vertebrae and powerful acids are under the seat? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a trusty pair of boots, thank you.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A saddle that will chap my ass? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll just walk, thank you.

    8. Re:No, thanks by PPH · · Score: 1

      That'll put a stop to all the hobos urinating on the bus seats.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    9. Re:No, thanks by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Unless you're in the US. Every time I'm there I see someone on the side of the road with a car fire. What's with your shoddy cars that they just burst into flames?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:No, thanks by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you visiting riots or something? I have never once seen a burning car at the side of the road

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:No, thanks by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      You never see anything doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

      I have seen car burning 3 times, all in the United States. No, not in riot, cars caught fire either overheating or electrical short or whatever.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    12. Re:No, thanks by zullnero · · Score: 1

      I second that. What are you doing, hitting riots? I've lived in this country for my whole life, 34 years, and I've never seen a car on the side of the road burning all on its own volition due to it being horribly bad. Maybe if another car hit it or something. We do car recalls over here if someone screwed up at the manufacturing plant. Or maybe you're confusing idiot drivers who never check their oil or water levels and screw up their engines with hapless people who just have crummy cars?

    13. Re:No, thanks by sincewhen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sharp nails and powerful glues are under the feet? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll walk around naked, thank you.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    14. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh. Screw this Flinstone/Green-tech crap. Toss a big ol' twin turbo v-12 diesel in the ass with about 900 ft. lbs. of torque so I can do wheelies on the way to work (and they can hear me coming for miles...)

      Commute like ya' got a pair...

      - Green is the new Red.

    15. Re:No, thanks by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      Springs and the support post are under the seat? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a horse, thank you.

      NO SPRINGS!

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    16. Re:No, thanks by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Colonel Pope surely didn't forseee rocketships

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    17. Re:No, thanks by Kotoku · · Score: 1

      I third this, I have never, EVER seen burning cars on the side of the road.

    18. Re:No, thanks by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Gasoline doesn't release all of its energy at once. It is extremely flammable, and burns very rapidly, although it will still take several minutes to burn completely. If a bus catches on fire, odds are that you'll have (barely) enough time to get out safely.

      Capacitors discharge very quickly. Here's a "small" one.

      A more appropriate analogy would be a bus with dynamite strapped under the seats. (Unless, of course, these capacitors somehow have an inherently slow discharge rate)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    19. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't.

    20. Re:No, thanks by Ironchew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sharp rocks and powerful scorpions are under the feet? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll be carried around on my royal litter, thank you.

    21. Re:No, thanks by Megatog615 · · Score: 1

      For the 20 years of my life in the US, I have never seen a car burning on the side of the road. I think you just got lucky. A lot of us drive imports anyway.

    22. Re:No, thanks by Megatog615 · · Score: 1

      Molten rock and burrowed predators are under the feet? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll just float, thank you.

    23. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Inherently unstable bipedal locomotion under the hip? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll stick to swinging around on vines, thank you.

    24. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clumsy bearers and socialist overtures under the feet? call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll just stay in my tree, thank you

      never should have come down in the first place.

    25. Re:No, thanks by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      I have. I was driving home from college and passed a car which, like mine was packed with crap with a hugungous mattress-thing on top, but, unlike mine, was on FIRE.

      For the next 1100 miles, I was sanguine about every set back on the road..."Well, at least I'm not on fire."

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    26. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sharp rocks and powerful scorpions are under the feet? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll stand right here and let the world come to me, thank you.

    27. Re:No, thanks by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reliance on arbor infrastructure to get around and possibility of falling to the ground? I'll stick to swimming underwater, thank you.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    28. Re:No, thanks by internettoughguy · · Score: 1

      Hobnails under my feet? Call me old fashioned but I'll take a set of calloused feet, thank you.

    29. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      way to fuk it up

    30. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toasting in an epic bread

    31. Re:No, thanks by Sasayaki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Limited stop options and the serious risk of drowning? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a Ultracapacitor Bus which recharges at each stop, thank you.

      --
      Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    32. Re:No, thanks by navyjeff · · Score: 1

      I've seen several: a couple along the NJ turnpike, one on the DC beltway. It's quite a sight with the thick black smoke. I felt bad for the driver; there's no way he could recover anything from the vehicle after that.

      That said, I'm not sure how much of the burning was gasoline and how much was plastics, carpet, polyurethane, and etc. It all burns with black smoke.

    33. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electromagnetic kinetic drive technology? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take my trans-relativistic slipgate generator, thank you.

    34. Re:No, thanks by Firehed · · Score: 1

      And chances are that you've never seen a battery explode from being overloaded either. But both can and do happen. While I've never heard of a vehicle spontaneously combusting, I've heard of more gasoline/other combustable-related incidents than electrical/charging issues (including the wave of widely publicized but overall quite rare exploding laptop batteries a couple years ago), and the electrical ones also tend to cause much less damage.

      Shoddy charging circuitry can be just as dangerous as worn fuel lines. It's also just as preventable (and lord knows that there would be SOME sort of safety regulations in place to prevent manufacturers from making unsafe compromises) - so overall, it should hardly register on your list of concerns about this tech.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    35. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not royalty?

      Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take a bus, thank you.

    36. Re:No, thanks by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Dead skin and the bacteria living in them are under my feet?

      Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time), but I'm just going to roll to my destination.

    37. Re:No, thanks by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Assassins carrying the litter? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll just take the bus.

    38. Re:No, thanks by camperdave · · Score: 1

      A coworker pulled into a parking spot. I noticed an orange glow. We popped the hood, and part of her exhaust system (catalytic converter, maybe?) was emitting a nice cheery incandescent glow. If a piece of paper had blown up there, it would have caught on fire easily.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    39. Re:No, thanks by lanceran · · Score: 1

      You just killed the joke. I hope you're happy.

    40. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      toasting in an epic bread!!11

    41. Re:No, thanks by Sasayaki · · Score: 1

      Humour by repetition and copy-pasta? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take sarcasm or snide at worst, thank you.

      --
      Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    42. Re:No, thanks by Sasayaki · · Score: 1

      Wormhole based travel and the possibility of extra-dimensional mishaps? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll take my billion-year panspermia, thank you.

      --
      Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
    43. Re:No, thanks by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll .

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    44. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's so last post. Now it's
      [disparaging summary of the preceding proposition]? Call me old fashioned (and it won't be the first time) but I'll ["ironic" more sophisticated technology].

      Don't blame me, blame the developers.

    45. Re:No, thanks by richard.cs · · Score: 1

      Probably was the catalytic converter - I've seen them nearly white hot before. It happens when for some reason unburnt fuel is getting pumped into the exhaust, often when the engine is not running on all cylinders due to an ignition problem but sometimes just because the mixture or the timing is set way off. The catalyst then oxidizes the unburnt fuel like it's supposed to but overheats because there's so much of it.

    46. Re:No, thanks by LS · · Score: 1

      <!DOCTYPE thread_killing_meta_post
      <!ELEMENT Summary of the preceding proposition>
      <!ELEMENT less sophisticated alternative>
      ]>

      Line 1, Column 1: <Summary of the preceding proposition>
      error: no shit sherlock

      Line 1, Column 105: <less sophisticated alternative>
      error: thanks for killing the thread

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    47. Re:No, thanks by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      http://www.cap-xx.com/resources/faq.htm

      What happens if I apply excessive voltage to a supercapacitor?

      Supercapacitors are inherently safe. They do not contain any chemicals (such as Li) that may explode.

    48. Re:No, thanks by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Is this the start of a new meme?

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    49. Re:No, thanks by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      This motion thing sounds too complicated. I think I'll just stay in my shell and feed on plankton.

    50. Re:No, thanks by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I've heard that most car fires are caused by someone pulling over onto a grassy shoulder, and the catalytic converter igniting the dried grass. They do get pretty hot.

    51. Re:No, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going around in an endless circle? I didn't know we were talking NASCAR...

    52. Re:No, thanks by camperdave · · Score: 1

      So, here's a question: Why don't they put overheat sensors on catalytic converters? Or do they?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    53. Re:No, thanks by Jared555 · · Score: 1

      Put enough current/voltage through anything and it can/will explode. a watermellon for example. Also look up exploding wire on youtube. People dump enough current through a bit of wire and it makes a nice little pop.

    54. Re:No, thanks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your gut and cock waving around? call me old fashioned(and it won't be the first time) but you will walk rounded clothed.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    55. Re:No, thanks by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      I've driven over 1,000,000 miles (1,609,344 km) in the US, and I've seen cars burning on the side of the road twice.

    56. Re:No, thanks by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      A new meme, in my Slashdot?

      It's more likely than you think.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  7. been saying this for years by timmarhy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    people said i was crazy when i talked about this a few years ago. the best advatage of UC's is they don't melt when you discharge a huge current as batteries do, hello electric sports cars that kick the shit out of petrol engines.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:been saying this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about electric bus with Ferrari acceleration? I'll ride that!

    2. Re:been saying this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've read about a prototype bus that used a carbon-fiber composite flywheel for energy storage, and was said to feel like it had Porsche-level acceleration, despite being powered by a mere 30hp internal combustion engine.

    3. Re:been saying this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Until the flyweel explodes because of an accident, and sends shards of ultra-high-modulus carbon fiber into all of the bystanders.

    4. Re:been saying this for years by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      well, that'll teach them to loiter about, by-standing.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    5. Re:been saying this for years by type40 · · Score: 2, Funny

      people said i was crazy when i talked about this a few years ago.

      To be fair, at the time you were suffering from massive head trauma due to that skee ball accident. You said a lot of things. Yes, you were right about the supper caps. The quantum phase shifting nuns, not so much.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    6. Re:been saying this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right, a few years back I was messing with electronics, I happened to overcharge a capacitor, dont remember the specs, but it was 7 mm tall, 3mm diameter, when it exploded, my ears were ringing for a full minute.
      Anyway it was made in china too (I am not joking)

    7. Re:been saying this for years by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      the best advatage of UC's is they don't melt when you discharge a huge current as batteries do,

      Um, the leads melt, and they definitely melt anything that short circuits them. I remember accidentally melting pits into a screwdriver after charging a camera-flash capacitor.

    8. Re:been saying this for years by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      ...hello electric sports cars that kick the shit out of petrol engines.

      We're a getting there

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  8. I can see the design review meeting now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Engineer: Sorry, the idea didn't pan out. The battery works, but it's got no capacity. Useless.

    Marketing Guy: What do you mean, no capacity? It can't be zero if it works, right?

    Engineer: Sure, but it gets drained in seconds by any sort of circuit.

    Marketing Guy: They recharge as fast as they drain, right?

    Engineer: Yeah, sure. but...

    Marketing Guy: "Recharges in under a minute". Nothing on the market can match it. When can we ship in volume?

    1. Re:I can see the design review meeting now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can't possibly be it: you're assuming the marketing guy knows anything about the thing he's about to advertise!

  9. Title goes here by AniVisual · · Score: 1

    So this is like a train that goes on roads. But instead of having electricity all throughout the rails, it has them only on some tracks. And oh, if there's a red light, bye-bye, you're dead. What I think it'd do instead is be like a hybrid that has the ability to recharge at every bus stop. But I think it's an interesting idea. Being private means that there's no need to implement a system for billing the electricity too.

    But then again, what provides the electricity? If it's more fossil fuels, then it's not being green; it's cutting diesel costs.

    1. Re:Title goes here by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Capacitors could also be used to buffer the output from wind and solar power. Maybe your public transport could be programmed to only draw power in then seconds when wind power is available.

    2. Re:Title goes here by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would you be dead at a red light? If you're not moving then you're motors are drawing power.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:Title goes here by quanticle · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I think it'd do instead is be like a hybrid that has the ability to recharge at every bus stop.

      That's exactly the sort of thing this system does. Each stop has a set of overhead lines that allow the bus to recharge its capacitors enough to get to the next stop.

      But then again, what provides the electricity? If it's more fossil fuels, then it's not being green; it's cutting diesel costs.

      From the summary: "Even if you use the dirtiest coal plant on the planet [to charge an ultracapacitor], it generates a third of the carbon dioxide of diesel."

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    4. Re:Title goes here by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Actually, the red light problem is easily solvable. The slower you go, the less power the electric motors need. You could track via GPS how close you are to the next charging station, and automatically turn off things like the A/C if needed to make sure the bus gets to the next charge point.

    5. Re:Title goes here by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      you caould also have smaller booster caps that a service car can haul out in case a buz does get stuck somehow.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Title goes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air conditioning.

    7. Re:Title goes here by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If it's more fossil fuels, then it's not being green; it's cutting diesel costs

      As someone pointed out (hopefully in another thread), the diesel produces more CO2 than the electricity needed, even if the electricity is generated by the dirtiest generation plant on the planet.

  10. soundes extremely dangerous by yincrash · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    isn't the voltage across ultracapacitors really large with a large charge? if that cap explodes, i could see it being very very bad.
    also what about times when the bus doesn't need to pick up or drop of passengers? just stop the bus anyways?

    1. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Bright side -- the bus is guaranteed to be on time due to its charging cycle. I don't know about you but the buses around here are horrid.

    2. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if that cap explodes, i could see it being very very bad.

      If the fuel tank explodes...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't petrol and diesel highly flammable? If any car or bus explodes, I could see it being ver very bad...

      Sheesh, take a look around. Your laptop packs the energy of a hand grenade in its battery, your car's fuel tank has enough petrol to do considerable damage to a house, and overhead, there are wires just hanging there charged with enough electricity to kill you.

      Look at petrol stations, for example. I wouldn't trust half the people that stop to fill up to change the batteries in a remote control properly, let alone manage the transfer of over 1,280MJ of energy stored in a highly flammable liquid that can be ignited using static electricity (possibly even generated from wireless signal) using a nozzle with a metal tip into a car they've probably owned for 10+ years (and may have 'maintained' themselves for some of that).

      I'm sure that the capacitors will have to pass the most stringent safety standards possible before they are used commercially, like everything else in our socity.

      And I'm fine with that...

    4. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      isn't the voltage across ultracapacitors really large with a large charge? if that cap explodes, i could see it being very very bad.

      also what about times when the bus doesn't need to pick up or drop of passengers? just stop the bus anyways?

      Don't they stop for traffic lights anyway? Don't see how much difference that'd make.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Ironsides · · Score: 0

      A gasoline tank can not release all the energy at once. You would need to have a fuel air mixture do to so. A battery still takes time to fully discharge, due to internal resistance. Your worst case is a fire due to overheating. A capacitor will discharge all the energy in under a second. Welcome to instant barbecue.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    6. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to instant barbecue.

      Dude, if you want to prevent supercapacitors from growing in popularity you should stop finding new uses for them.

    7. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      FYI: fuel tanks do actually explode given a sufficiently violent crash. You want to be sitting on top of a supercapacitor when you get in an impact with a combined speed of 120mph+? Heck, assume you get in a head-on collision on a road with a 35mph speed limit. Launch a supercapacitor at 70mph at a wall and see how that works out. Just because we've been using gas tanks for the past 100 someodd years doesn't immediately make all supercapacitors safe. Of course, the corollary is that our years of automotive experience probably doesn't mean that supercapacitors would start out as unsafe as gas tanks did.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way to release 100% of the energy in a diesel tank in a few seconds (diesel doesn't explode, it barely burns). Capacitors can release 100% of their charge almost instantly if shorted (serious fireworks).

    9. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by m.alessandrini · · Score: 0

      No, in a capacitor the voltage is inversely proportional to capacitance. So, arbitrarily high capacitance = arbitrarily high charge at modest voltage. Also for explosions, a battery is much more likely to explode, due to the chemical reactors it contains. With the new technologies for ultracapacitors, like carbon nanotubes, there should be no chemical components at all inside.

    10. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by m.alessandrini · · Score: 0

      I correct myself: carbon nanotubes DO contain chemical components, but batteries are still more likely to explode due to their working principle, in which a chemical reaction is performed at every charge and discharge.

    11. Re:soundes extremely dangerous by molecular · · Score: 1

      also what about times when the bus doesn't need to pick up or drop of passengers? just stop the bus anyways?

      the diesel bus stops anyway, too. it must keep it's schedule and there is no point in being early.

  11. Wow by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty neat. There's tons of other uses for this technology. Among other things, ultra-capacitors are probably the way to go for non plug in hybrids.

  12. What if the bus has to detour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or becomes stuck in traffic? Is there a backup gas engine?

    1. Re:What if the bus has to detour by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Would make more sense to have a backup battery.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
  13. tag by rbasomb · · Score: 1

    mmmmm.... last year Team BMW Sauber almost cooked a F1 mechanic. http://www.bmwblog.com/2008/07/30/bmw-kers-shocks-mechanic-to-ground/ whatcouldpossiblygowrong in a municipal bus?

    1. Re:tag by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      last year Team BMW Sauber almost cooked a F1 mechanic

      My dad is a retired electrical lineman, he's seen plenty of his co-workers cooked. Those overhead wires are 750 volts at virtually limitless amps (limited only by the fuses), and the high tension lines are 30Kv. Of course, I imagine more die from falling off the poles and towers.

      Should we ban electricity?

  14. High potential by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For urban locations where stops are seldom more than a block or two apart this makes for lower infrastructure costs, as no over-street trolly cables are needed.

    The ability to alter routes would also be fairly flexible because you could tie into the power grid anywhere you need to add a station.

    But the amount of power you need to deliver in a short time means that the stations have to have either the ability to acquire and store a massive charge in the between-bus intervals, (their own ultra-capacitors) or the grid inter-tie would really have to be massive enough to dump that much power into the bus in a couple minutes, for as many buses as you need to send down the line in rush hour.

    A shorted capacitor might be fearsome fireworks display.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:High potential by JoeInnes · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm dubious that a charging station cum bus stop will be cheaper to build and maintain than the infrastructure of cables required for trolley buses.

    2. Re:High potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the amount of power you need to deliver in a short time means that the stations have to have either the ability to acquire and store a massive charge in the between-bus intervals, (their own ultra-capacitors)

      They need to be built from concrete anyway, so plenty of protection to put a flywheel under the bus stops?

  15. What happens in a traffic jam? by dido · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I imagine the streets of many major cities may wind up getting traffic jams very frequently, so what happens if the bus gets stuck in such a one, and it takes an hour or more to get moving again (e.g. vehicular accident further down), or however long it takes to discharge the ultracapacitors? I suppose it may be necessary to install a backup engine that runs on conventional fuel, possibly just to run a generator which will charge the ultracapacitors sufficiently to get to the next stop.

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    1. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the question of sufficient fuel supply exists regardless of what type of fuel you may be using

    2. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 2, Informative

      it shouldn't use any power just sitting there. capacitors do slowly discharge of their own accord, but an hour in a traffic jam shouldn't be a problem. they will have to turn off the a/c though.

    3. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by Xeth · · Score: 1

      Electric motors don't idle. Kill the climate control if something goes grievously wrong.

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    4. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by v1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most caps can store charge for months or even years. They can store both high current and high voltage, but cannot deliver a sustained current. In that respect they're a bit like a high pressure air tank, where the gas doesn't change state to a liquid in the tank. (like CO2 does, those are called "constant air" tanks, and are more akin to lead acid batteries because they maintain their pressure until almost exhausted) Like an air tank can retain pressure for months without significant loss as long as there's no leak, so can capacitors.

      I work on HV equipment and am all too aware of how capacitors (and things that behave like them... picture tubes in particular) can retain several hundred volts (life threatening) of power for months. Always have to discharge them before working on them, even if they HAVE been unplugged for a month.

      Buses I've been on aren't known for their air conditioning anyway. When the bus is idling in a jam it's just sitting there and consuming almost zero of its power reserves.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But with this mode we aren't carrying 100 times the required fuel to make the trip to the next bus station.

      I'm sorry but there really is something wrong with full fuel load -- sub 100 mile range.

    6. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by ihavnoid · · Score: 1

      Or even better, activate the compressors of the air conditioners only on bus stops. ...However, I'm sort of worried what will happen if the traffic jam is so horrible that the bus runs something around 5km/h, with constant acceleration/deacceleration.

    7. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by metalcoat · · Score: 1

      IANAE (Engineer) but why couldn't you essentially load several capacitors up and have then dissipate energy in succession? I have no idea how much they cost or the practicality of it.

    8. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Here in Europe, we have bus lanes.

    9. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I imagine the streets of many major cities may wind up getting traffic jams very frequently

      Have dedicated mass transit lanes. In Minneapolis we have not just individual lanes only buses can use but entire roads. There's a section of a road not far from me that cars can not drive on, it is only used for mass transit.

      Falcon

    10. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the big advantages of electric vehicles is that when you get stuck in trafic are are not moving you dont waste energy or maybe like .1% of the normal amount of energy. The engine basically is off unlike ICEs which need to idle. So your point is moot. An electric car can go about the same distance at 30 miles an hour as 1 mile an hour.

    11. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep em shorted when in storage.

    12. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by meyekul · · Score: 1

      Everyone has to get out and push! Come to think of it, that would be an even better savings of energy -- just make everyone get out and walk their fat asses to the next station.

    13. Re:What happens in a traffic jam? by v1 · · Score: 1

      capacitors can be used in parallel or series. parallel for more current, series for more voltage. higher voltage can be beneficial because it requires smaller cables and has less loss, but it requires more expensive materials to contain (insulate) the high voltage.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  16. Coal power plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Even if you use the dirtiest coal plant on the planet"

    How funny, I'd make a big bet that it is located in China.

  17. No US company involved here.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sinautec, as I suspected, is a Chinese firm, with an office in VA.

    http://www.sinautecus.com/contact.html

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:No US company involved here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sinautec, as I suspected, is a Chinese firm, with an office in VA.

      http://www.sinautecus.com/contact.html

      An office in VA that happens to be its headquarters...

    2. Re:No US company involved here.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      The headquarters of "Sinautec US", maybe.

      The true corporate headquarters actually appears to be in France:

      http://www.sinautec.com/

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    3. Re:No US company involved here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      perhaps you should work on catching up?

      the US doesn't build things anymore; when you stop designing and inventing things as well, you'll be truly finished.

    4. Re:No US company involved here.... by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      You can bet that the fine American firm of Dewey, Cheatam, and Howe drew up the contracts.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    5. Re:No US company involved here.... by Z1NG · · Score: 1

      the US doesn't build things anymore; when you stop designing and inventing things as well, you'll be truly finished.

      Apparently it built a website that you have nothing better to do than troll...

  18. PIloting a Bus by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    That's nice that "A US company and its Chinese partner" are piloting the bus, but I think it would be much more interesting to know who designed and built it.

    1. Re:PIloting a Bus by citizenr · · Score: 1

      That's nice that "A US company and its Chinese partner" are piloting the bus, but I think it would be much more interesting to know who designed and built it.

      Chinese did, and that "US company" is also Chinese. Now shut up and go to Walmart buy more Chinese stuff.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    2. Re:PIloting a Bus by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I think it would be much more interesting to know who designed and built it.

      I found that out by the simple expedient of reading the article:

      Buses in the Shanghai pilot are made by Germantown, TN-based Foton America Bus Co, which uses ultracapacitors manufactured by Shanghai Aowei.

    3. Re:PIloting a Bus by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but I was just trying for a dumb pun. (The poster meant "piloting" as in "running a pilot program" - but I was taking it to mean "steering a vehicle.")

  19. The Flux Supercapacitor by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is what makes bus travel POSSIBLE!!!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:The Flux Supercapacitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For jokes like this is that I keep reading Slashdot.

    2. Re:The Flux Supercapacitor by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Is what makes bus travel POSSIBLE!!!

      Wow, a faster than light bus! That's even faster then the bus in my computer!

  20. We've been doing this for years by mcrbids · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... in San Francisco, at least. They have lines of pure electric buses, with two power cables that run up to lines suspended over the road. You can see one here and I don't think this is particularly unique to San Francisco.

    Is this to say that electric buses in San Francisco ALSO generate 1/3 the CO2? How are they lighter, since they aren lugging around huge ultracapacitors and regenerative brakes? How efficient are regenerative brakes? Could you put smaller ultracaps on existing buses and just use them to charge up from brakes, feeding the rest from the existing power lines?

    Neat idea, but in reality, this doesn't seem like as big a step as it may seem. Might be nice to get rid of unsightly wires, though.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:We've been doing this for years by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      It's not just that wires are unsightly; I imagine it's much simpler to create a new capacitor bus route rather than an electric route with overhead cables. With that level of infrastructure build-out, seems to me like they'd just go ahead and build a proper streetcar line.

    2. Re:We've been doing this for years by taniwha · · Score: 1

      with ultra capacitors you just put 'lines' in every so often - perhaps at bus stops

    3. Re:We've been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How efficient are regenerative brakes?"

      This is a non-useful question, since all non-regenerative brakes are 0% efficient.

    4. Re:We've been doing this for years by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to put new lines in, you just hook up a meter, a similar ultra-capacitor bank, and tap into whatever you have locally available. Residential areas will be relatively low traffic, so you can manage the one bus every half hour on the low voltage residential lines. Higher traffic commercial and industrial districts will similarly have higher capacity power available to them.

      The bigger question is how do you 'fill' the bus? Do you have a zone the bus has to stop within, and robotic arm plugs into the roof? Do you have the bus driver get out and plug in a huge, heavily shielded connector? You would probably have to lock up the fill points. While may be a better place without the people trying to steal the copper cables and/or other electronics, roasted thieves on the side of the road would not be a good thing.

    5. Re:We've been doing this for years by PFAK · · Score: 1

      We have those in Vancouver as well, except we have articulated and single electric trolleys. Great idea, virtually silent.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    6. Re:We've been doing this for years by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      RTFA. There's a short section of overhead wires at each bus stop. The bus has arms that rise to touch the wires.

  21. Can't believe you didn't... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

    In soviet russia, ultracapacitor bus recharges YOU!

    1. Re:Can't believe you didn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never have I been so glad to not live in Soviet Russia

    2. Re:Can't believe you didn't... by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1

      Never have I been so glad to not live in Soviet Russia

      Amen.

      --
      "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
    3. Re:Can't believe you didn't... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      I believe it's Maoist China we're talking about...

  22. If this turns out to be viable... by rcolbert · · Score: 1

    ...there's no reason why every rental car shuttle bus and parking shuttle bus at every airport shouldn't be converted post-haste. Then to prove a point, let's go ahead and power them with the dirtiest coal plant we can find to see if the claims are true.

  23. energy density by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ultracapacitors are made of activated carbon and have an energy density of six watt-hours per kilogram. (For comparison, a high-performance lithium-ion battery can achieve 200 watt-hours per kilogram.) Clifford Clare, chief executive of Foton America, says another 60 buses will be delivered early next year with ultracapacitors that supply 10 watt-hours per kilogram.

    Or, to put this in more sensible terms. 0.021MJ/kg (0.036MJ/kg next year) for an ultracap vs 0.72MJ/kg for a lithium-ion battery. Aka, the tiny bottom left square in this chart. Compare this to, say, gasoline at 47MJ/kg or even hydrogen at 142MJ/kg and you start to get some idea of why people are excited about "the hydrogen economy".

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that hydrogen is not a fuel, and you get some idea why I think people who get excited over the hydrogen economy shoud be shot.

    2. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hydrogen? Bah...that's nothing. Where's the entry for antimatter?
      http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/home/antimatter_spaceship.html

    3. Re:energy density by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Huh? Neither is an ultracapacitor.. I think I was making a perfectly far comparison.. you can store energy for mobile application in a battery or in an ultracapacitor (worse) or in hydrogen (better).

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:energy density by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or even hydrogen at 142MJ/kg and you start to get some idea of why people are excited about "the hydrogen economy".

      Call me when there's a cheap way to store 30kg of hydrogen at STP in a form that can easily be used and stored onboard in a vehicle for at least 4 weeks without losses.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    5. Re:energy density by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      OK, reality is calling: Combine the hydrogen with carbon to form long chain hydro carbons, then you can store it at STP and use it in the present crop of internal combustion engines without requiring any modifications...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    6. Re:energy density by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I think I was making a perfectly far comparison.. you can store energy for mobile application in a battery or in an ultracapacitor (worse) or in hydrogen (better).

      Batteries and ultracapacitors include their own enclosures and are stable at room temperature.

      Hydrogen, however, requires ultra massive tanks to store the stuff, immense amounts of energy to get it in there (cooling and pressurizing), it's immensely reactive and so will quickly destroy any container material, storage is simply impractical, and the conversion losses to and from it are HORRIBLE.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the trade-off's between cost, energy density and service life with service life being one of the biggest killers (energy savings are lost in replacement and disposal costs) I wonder why no one is talking about nickel-iron batteries.

      While they have a higher self discharge rate and a lower power output, they have a service life that is over 30 years and are pretty much immune to abuse. Considering that the technology hasn't been developed since the 70's it still has a comparable energy density to lead acid, and when service life is factored in - a considerably lower price. It looks like Nickel-Iron batteries would be perfect for things like solar or wind farms to store excess energy as they would likely outlast any wind or solar generating equipment and require little maintenance. Am I missing something?
      If the same effort was put into developing these as we have with lead acid, it seems like solar and wind would become much more viable.
      Wikipedia article on Nickel-Iron Battery
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel-iron_battery
      Wikipedia article on Lead-Acid Battery
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead-acid_battery

    8. Re:energy density by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as the chart shows, the energy density has a hell of a lot of margin.

      Hell, growing ethanol is more effective than making batteries.

      The real difference is that full electric cars are charge at home.. people currently don't care about this but I think when it eventually becomes common place they'll wonder how they ever got used to having to go to a fuel station to "recharge" their car.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a shame that hydrogen is so damn energy intensive to create. Much worse than using electric.

    10. Re:energy density by jschen · · Score: 1

      If you have access to Angewandte Chemie, check out this review (free abstract) on hydrogen storage. In one of the first figures in the paper (not at work, forget offhand whether it was figure 1 or 2), it makes a comparison between diesel, hydrogen, and state of the art lithium batteries, considering both energy density and "fuel tank" requirements. Even though the authors are very much pro-hydrogen, the figure is very much pro-diesel. Sure, the weight of the hydrogen is miniscule. But the tanks even under calculated ideal circumstances are rather heavy.

    11. Re:energy density by fnj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, now state the energy-to-mass and energy-to-volume figures of the gasoline PLUS gas tank versus that of the hydrogen PLUS storage matrix. Fact is, petroleum or synfuel equivalent is the most volume-efficient storage mechanism for hydrogen yet devised - not even counting the contribution of the carbon content. One liter of gasoline contains a higher mass of hydrogen than one liter of liquid hydrogen.

      State of the art hydrogen storage systems have a container mass 10x the mass of the contained hydrogen, versus around 0.1x for gasoline tanks. Compressing or liquefying the hydrogen saps a huge amount of the theoretical energy efficiency of the system.

      When you add container weight, petroleum is the most MASS-efficient storage mechanism for hydrogen.

    12. Re:energy density by fnj · · Score: 1

      I have heard this statement many times. OK, if hydrogen is not a fuel, neither is petroleum. Both of them have to be created or extracted and purified or refined. All that petroleum is doing is storing energy that came ultimately from the sun. Ergo, they are both energy storage media, not ultimate sources of energy.

    13. Re:energy density by fnj · · Score: 1

      Within their limits, NiFe cells (Edison cells) are great. Here's where you can read about them and buy them NiFe cells source

    14. Re:energy density by Barnett · · Score: 1

      A vehicle also has limited space. If you look at the other axis of that graph (MJ/l), you will be a lot less excited about hydrogen. Unless of course your vehicle is a zeppelin, then space is not a problem.

    15. Re:energy density by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Progress is slow in hydrocarbon fuel cells though.

      --
    16. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're dumb, and need to be flogged. If you don't understand why, I weep for you. Extracting and puryfing gasoline is a NET ENERGY WINNER for us, THAT'S WHY WE DO IT, dumbass. For every barrel of oil you burn to extract oil and make gasoline, you get 20 barrels of oil out of the ground. THAT'S WHY WE USE OIL AS A FUEL. IT WORKS.
      And when you get to the point were you can't get more than a barrel of oil out of the ground for burning one barrel, WE ARE FUCKED.
      Besides coal and nuclear, THERE ARE NO OTHER SOURCES OF ENERGY. PERIOD. Solar and wind are farts to the hurricane of energy the human race needs, and rely utterly on the fossil fuel technology base.

    17. Re:energy density by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as the chart shows, the energy density has a hell of a lot of margin.

      "density" doesn't matter remotely near enough to make up for those 90% hydrogen losses.

      Places where "density" matters tend to be small spots, like cell phones. If we're talking about large-scale usage, there's always enough room for batteries.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:energy density by fnj · · Score: 1

      You are a very stupid asshole.

    19. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also very right. Now go get an education before spouting nonsense again. "Petroleum is not a fuel"... sheesh, what a candy rainbow world you must live in...

    20. Re:energy density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that sure told him.

    21. Re:energy density by fnj · · Score: 1

      Come back when you grow up, fool.

  24. Combine this with the super-capacitor by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    and we might get something that works !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  25. Cheaper? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    The article just says that the bus itself is cheaper than a lithium-ion battery powered bus. It doesn't sound like they are accounting for the entire charging system. I can see how ultracapacitors would be useful for this case, since a bus is extremely heavy and basically stops every half mile. Regenerative braking would wear out a lithium ion battery pack fairly quickly and wouldn't be as efficient.

    Otherwise, I'm fairly skeptical that ultracapacitors are really that price-competitive with batteries. Anyone want to try to convince me?

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  26. The effect of Unsprung Weight by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to remedy the unsprung weight problem?

    Anyone?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:The effect of Unsprung Weight by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to remedy the unsprung weight problem?

      a flat road with no bumps, or rail.

    2. Re:The effect of Unsprung Weight by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Yes. Start out by making the wheel lighter.

      One idea would be to attach the electric motors (per wheel) to the end of each drive shaft. All four motors would be located toward the center of the car improving the center of gravity and weight distribution. The wheels then could be more free to travel up and down with the now reduced weight as well. Assuming of course your drive shafts are made of light weight materials that can handle the torque.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:The effect of Unsprung Weight by maxume · · Score: 1

      Moving the weight from the wheels to the center of the car would likely have a negative impact on the center of gravity (as you would have more stuff to put in the center, causing you to put it higher, which is probably undesirable for a car.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:The effect of Unsprung Weight by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You sir are missing the point.

      The worst place to put weight is in the wheels.

      If you don't understand that you need to study college physics.

      Unsprung weight is always reduced to a practical minimum as it leads to wheel hop (or at least requirements for much stronger shock absorbers.) This is true for every vehicle from an F1 car to a semi truck.

      CG issues are secondary.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:The effect of Unsprung Weight by maxume · · Score: 1

      I have a degree in mechanical engineering (I even got decent grades). I was correcting a single point in the GP post (that moving things toward the center of the vehicle would somehow improve the center of gravity), not trying to insist that optimizing center of gravity was important.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  27. one point missed, tech lifespan by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last I checked, capacitors have a very long lifespan, many many years compared to what, 5-10 for lead acid and lithium ion. They don't get memory, their performance doesn't degrade over time. And unlike lead acid, they don't mind the vibrations and jolts of being in a vehicle. I'm not aware of any severe temp restrictions on them either - I know for certain that hotter areas of the country have to have different kinds of batteries because of how heat kills batteries. (moreso than cold)

    So that makes them cheaper to run since you don't have to change out batteries for many thousands of dollars every 5-7 years like you do on the hybrid cars.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One downside. Touch both poles of a lead acid battery and you'll get a shock. Touch both leads on a capacitor and you end up in a pine box. There are additional safety concerns with capacitors. Unlike batteries they tend to have a lot of amperage when they discharge. I think they are a great idea but people have forgotten the old TV sets that had capacitors with enough charge to be dangerous. That's a TV imagine a car capacitor. Fatal would be an understatement, well done might be closer to the truth. It might be a good idea to build in a discharge feature if they are in an accident much like airbags. Might save the lives of rescue crews.

    2. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      One thing to keep in mind is that capacitors are designed to pretty much discharge all at once in a blinding flash whereas the internal resistance of a battery will limit the current to something that might take at least minutes to discharge, if not longer.

      What causes fires with lithium-ion batteries is an internal short. But still, there is enough resistance to limit the current to a dull glow.

      A bus-sized ultracapacitor would need to be able to supply thousands of amps for many minutes. Roughly, as a minimum you might need 20 minutes times 4000 amps or 80,000 amp-minutes at hundreds of volts. You could get this from car batteries in series because 1200 amp-hours (about 80,000 amp-minutes) is a quite reasonable capacity for car batteries. The problem is, you can't get 4000 amps out of car batteries because of the internal resistance. Hence, an ultracapacitor to the rescue.

      Except any fault in the electric supply means you have almost zero resistance feeding a short. Yes, it would almost certainly take out the bus with the resulting explosion. At least the capacitor would explode and maybe anything else connected to it in the circuit. Lots of vaporized metal.

      Note: 4,0000 amps at 480 volts is what is required to move a electric subway car. I would guess you could get by with maybe half the total volt-amperes for a bus rather than a subway car. But maybe not as there is a lot less resistance to rolling a subway car on tracks than a bus with tires.

    3. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except people are not. The hydrogen economy was a pipe dream of some talking heads in the late 90s early 00's. Now the technical consensus is that it more or less will never happen. Which is why the DOE has defunded most of hits hydrogen based reaserch

    4. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last job was designing a charger for these capacitors for a UPS.

      They have a upper limit in operating temperature 60-70C as the Ultracap uses water based dielectric. Chemical is added to lower the internal resistance. Slightly different chemical mix added to the water can operate at higher temperature, but does so with worse lifetime.

      The useful lifetime of these capacitors drops very rapidly if you insist on using/storing them close to the upper range, so you really want to keep them below 50C.

    5. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to put some stuff in there to keep a short from happening then.

    6. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by v1 · · Score: 1

      One thing to keep in mind is that capacitors are designed to pretty much discharge all at once in a blinding flash whereas the internal resistance of a battery will limit the current to something that might take at least minutes to discharge, if not longer

      Although batteries have a larger internal resistance, that's not the dominating effect. Lead acid batteries use a chemical change to replenish the charge on the plates, an effect that occurs over time. (faster discharge batteries usually suffer from heat issues due to the chemical reaction required being sped up and thus releasing more heat) They are "constant voltage" supplies. As the voltage is sipped off the plates, the chemicals in the battery replenish the voltage and return the plates to their previous voltage. This process continues until the chemical potential is exhausted, at which point plate voltage rapidly drops.

      Caps on the other hand store massive amounts of charge, and have little means of replenishing it once taken. Because of this when some power is tapped from the cap, it's not replenished, and the voltage drops every time.

      Because of this, caps' storage potential is a factor of how high of a voltage you can pack into them, combined with how much charge. You make the cap retain a greater charge by increasing its size, it's about 1:1 gain. By using better insulators, you can increase the voltage without increasing the size, so most high energy caps are high voltage so they can be small. This is not a requirement however.

      Lets not forget it's current that kills, not voltage. All the voltage does is make an easier path for the current to take to get you. There's more than enough current in a single car battery to punch your ticket. It's just that 12 volts is not enough under most circumstances to get the current running at any quantity through your body. (overcome skin resistance)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    7. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1
      The capacitor lifetime depends on the design and what shortcuts the manufacturer took. Old-fashioned dry caps, stuff like mica and ceramics, should last for hundreds of years. Modern ultra-high-capacity electrolytic caps are often rated for less than 2000 hours -- one year, at 8 hours a day. (Now, by 'lifetime', what they mean is that after that time, it will have less than 50% of its original ability to hold charge.) Here is a page discussing what environmental and duty characteristics will shorten an electrolytic cap's lifetime. There are some really fabulous manufacturers out there, including chemi-con and particularly nichicon, but there are also some *horrible* manufacturers, whose caps will burst into flame. I've seen a number of these, especially about 2 years ago when apparently someone got the wrong formulation for the electrolyte and a bunch of companies started cranking out caps based on that, which died really quickly.

      Basically, as is so often the case, the caps that don't really have that great an energy density have long lifetimes and great behavior across a wide range of temps, but the current crop of good energy density caps often show temperature dependent behavior and short, temp-dependent lifetimes.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    8. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by v1 · · Score: 1

      Note: 4,0000 amps at 480 volts is what is required to move a electric subway car. e

      (we'll assume you mean 4,000 amps, not 40,000)

      watts=amps x volts so that's 1920kW (1.9mW)

      HP=kW/.746 so that's about 2500HP. I hope it doesn't take anywhere near that kind of engine to move a bus unless you're trying to drive it at 250mph or something.

      A bus can get by on what, 500HP? 1/5 of that? less? I don't have any idea what HP engine a bus typically has. And if it's going to be running new tech we can assume it's going to be made of light materials and composites to maximize efficiency so it's no greyhound.

      Capacitors are also a lot lighter than lead acid batteries by volume so that helps with efficiency.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    9. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by syncrotic · · Score: 1

      Everything you wrote is flat out wrong. Please educate yourself on Ohm's law before commenting further.

      I = V / R

      A common battery doesn't shock you because your skin resistance is high enough that almost no current flows through you. Your average car battery can put out hundreds of amperes, the average capacitor, perhaps thousands. Given how little current it takes to kill you, they might as well be infinite sources... but at 12V, neither will do you any harm.

    10. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I would guess you could get by with maybe half the total volt-amperes for a bus rather than a subway car. But maybe not as there is a lot less resistance to rolling a subway car on tracks than a bus with tires.

      Nah, you won't need anywhere near 2K amps at 480 volts. The transit monorails that I've driven weigh about 150,000 pounds, and from a dead stop will draw around 1500 amps at 600 volts DC under substantial acceleration. Once they're rolling, they pull around a third of that current on a level beamway, and that's accounting for the resistance of 12 pneumatic load tires on concrete, plus another 52 guide tires that are held against the sides of the beam under considerable pressure, plus the mechanical losses from eight gearboxes. Also included in that power draw are a dozen large A/C units, a *huge* air compressor, and various other electronic gear being driven off of seven inverters, each of which will have their own non-trivial losses.

      A typical transit bus weighs about 40-50K pounds, has *much* lower rolling resistance than one of my trains, and doesn't have all the other crap stuck on it drawing power either, with the exception of a single A/C unit and air compressor in most cases. Back-of-the-napkin guess would be that you could pretty easily get by with a couple hundred amps, assuming a 480 VDC system.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    11. Re:one point missed, tech lifespan by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I misspoke on that last post - it's the A/C units that are driven off the inverters. The DC stuff is all run off a large battery that is constantly being charged.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  28. I got your range problem solved right here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fisher Price figured it out years ago.
    When the batteries dies, replace them.

    Make the power pack standardized and quickly swappable.

    You're welcome.

  29. That Green Tech? Will be Developed in China... by netsharc · · Score: 0

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/opinion/27friedman.html -- basically, while in the US obstructionists are still yelling "climate change is a myth!", China is going green because it's realized it has poisoned its citizen enough. Look forward to them exporting their tech to the rest of the world...

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:That Green Tech? Will be Developed in China... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      No, Chinese companies (and governments) make green energy products because there's where the money is now. In fact, the central government is trying to overcapacity in solar/wind energy sectors. The US is still a leader, not only in technology, but in exploring new business opportunities. China acts very fast, but they are always in catch-up mode in the sense.

    2. Re:That Green Tech? Will be Developed in China... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      typo. I meant "the central government is trying to cu overcapacity"

  30. An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.utexas.edu/research/cem/Energy%20Storage%20Composite%20Rotor.html

    The University of Texas at Austin Center for Electromechanics (UT-CEM) has developed a 2 kW-hr flywheel battery for energy management on a hybrid electric urban bus. The battery will recover braking energy and store excess energy generated by the prime mover. The flywheel rotor, fabricated from high-strength composites, spins at 36,000 rpm at full charge (~825 m/s tip speed), and is housed in a vacuum enclosure to minimize windage drag. A cross-section of the flywheel system design is shown. Ensuring flywheel safety is a major issue that must be addressed in using flywheels for transportation applications. In support of this activity, the durability tests performed under Phase IV of the DARPA Flywheel Safety Program, focused on this flywheel design.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by countertrolling · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think it'll work this time? I kinda prefer the "solid state" nature of the capacitors.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by jnnnnn · · Score: 1

      A horizontal flywheel would be totally awesome - no matter how fast you cornered, there would be no "roll".

    3. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Genda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Flywheel energy storage is far more feasible for larger scale storage in a fixed position power applications (eg. home, light commercial, and industrial.)

      In a high speed collision, if the containment vessel is breached, a flywheel can become an autonomous buzz-saw with a kill radius of several miles. Even worse, if such a breach occurred in a traffic jam, and one flywheel hits other vehicles liberating more flywheels, it would result in a chain reaction that could level an urban or suburban community.

      One possible solution, might be some way to discharge the flywheels energy quickly in the case of the car's sensing a collision. Maybe an active circuit that quickly drives the flywheels energy into a different storage device... like a super capacitor?

    4. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by hoskeri · · Score: 1

      This is just begging for a Roland Emmerich Movie.

      --
      Even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat
    5. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by malkir · · Score: 1

      "In a high speed collision, if the containment vessel is breached, a flywheel can become an autonomous buzz-saw with a kill radius of several miles. [...]it [could] result in a chain reaction that could level an urban or suburban community." How does this work? /curious

    6. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      How does this work?

      Like a giant frisbee on steroids...

    7. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by JerryQ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked for Shell UK in the late 70s, using Univac 1108 and 1110 machines.

      They had rows and rows of drum store, each a 1/4 ton cylinder, maybe 1m diameter, rotating at 20,000 rpm. Fixed heads running in a strip down the side, a form of memory somewhere between main and disk, allowing full memory dumps during crash.

      They used to take 3 hrs to power up, and Univac engineers used to describe how, if they came off their bearings the outcome was called 'creaming'.

      Apparently one came off on a site and 'walked' out of the machine room, pausing only to stroll through a CAU (command Arithmetic Unit - a device as big as a wardrobe), another drilled down through a building.

    8. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good luck counter steering that!

    9. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by cellurl · · Score: 1

      how big is it? Cubic feet.

    10. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by jhfry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I maintained a smaller, IBM drum unit, mounted on a military plane. I often wonder what it would be like to work on a modern implementation. Imagine, zero seek times, less than 1ms access times, and parallel reads possibly from every track at once (if the bus would allow it).

      The system I worked on was a whopping 12Mhz minicomputer... and it's 60's era drum unit was actually faster than any magnetic storage available today (for random reads and writes), I did the math once and it could sustain well over 200MB's (if every track were read at once); not that the system could feed it data that fast or that it had that much capacity.

      Fun read: http://www.tpub.com/neets/book22/92d.htm

      Don't even get me started on the core memory that was later replaced with bubble memory. Though I do miss the days of a computer maintaining it's state when power is removed.

      It's kind of amusing how we have gone backwards from those days. MRAM always seems to be a few years away and in the meantime if the power goes out, we lose everything. Even in the 60's this wasn't the case.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    11. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Going up and down hills could be quite exciting, however!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    12. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      A horizontal flywheel would be totally awesome - no matter how fast you cornered, there would be no "roll".

      Shhh! Keep it secret! Do Raceys tell Gimbals?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    13. Re:An invention from University of Texas at Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I wonder if the inertia of the flywheel could be used to help in overall stability of the vehicle in which it was used. Or would the idea be to mount it on a set of gimbles so that it wouldn't interfere with a change of orientation of the vehicle?

  31. EESTOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will be doing just this IF they are real. And yes, it has been planned for this.

  32. Except that by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    this does not use batteries, does not swap anything. Did you not read the article?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Except that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm talking "Old Skool" Li:ion 0.x

      I realize the main thread is about ultracapacitors.
      Would actually not make much sense to swap the capacitors, since they are quickly rechargeable.

  33. how are electric trolleys not better by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    They went to the trouble to dog electric trolleys in the article, but why not just make the trolleys 40% lighter and add regenerative breaking? At least do an apples to apples comparison between the two. I am wondering since you need to store the energy if line loss or high voltage would be a problem with the ultracapacitor.

  34. Sure by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    this will hold but a FRACTION of the energy that a regular battery powered bus will. It will only move several miles on a charge. Assume that the caps cost 20x for same amount of energy (they are not; they are less than 10X). But in this case, the bus will ONLY go several miles at most. OTH, electric buses are designed to go minimum 60 miles, which is at least 20x. So, worse case situation, the cap and battery costs the same (really not likely). The BIG difference is that the cap can be used easily for braking AND will last a lifetime. Batteries can not be used for braking AND will need to be replaced every couple of years.

    For buses, and even metro trains, this is the right way to go.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. Nothing all that new here by calidoscope · · Score: 1
    I remember seeing an article on a flywheel powered bus in the likes of Popular Science back in the mid-60's. There would be a recharging station every few stops where the flywheel would be spun up again. These stations consisted of something similar to a trolley wire bracket with three contacts (three phase AC) and three wires from the bus would rise up to meet the contacts similar to how a trolley pole contacts the trolley wire.

    Ultracaps and modern power electronics make this idea a lot more practical.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  36. No - UC eventually could let you go anywhere by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

    The bus has to stick to a route, which is why this works for initial deployment. However, imagine if rechargers were installed at every red light - little pop-up electrical contacts that mate with the cars when they stop, complete with a micro-payment system that accounts for each micro-fill.

    Now you don't have to carry around loads of batteries.

  37. Hydrogen economy is a joke. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Numerous studies have been done and prove that the energy into it will be worse than what it is for any fossil fuel. Right now, the amount of energy on a cap is low, BUT with more RD work, that will change. OTH, the costs of hydrogen and oil will only continue upwards.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  38. So now we're literally giving Washington to China by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    First Most Favored Nation status, then nuclear missle secrets, then an (actual?) Manchurian candidate. What's next ?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  39. Let's not get carried away by uuddlrlrab · · Score: 1

    Lest everyone forget, this is a bus we're talking about. I don't think I ever saw WRX STi badging on that bad boy, so while reducing wheel weight is good as it reduces the gyro effect when the wheel spins, but I doubt that these vehicles are going to wind up facing wheel-skip problems... I hope. They're not making any more Speed sequels/prequels/craptinuations, are they?

    --
    Odi profanum vulgus et arceo
  40. My bus route is so slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could charge a regular battery at each stop

  41. I'll take a trusty pair of boots by falconwolf · · Score: 1
  42. How...... by elkto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Even if you use the dirtiest coal plant on the planet [to charge an ultracapacitor], it generates a third of the carbon dioxide of diesel.'"

    Petroleum diesel C16H34 or C14H30
    Coal Errrrrr C with variable trace quantities of S, H, O and N.
    Subcritical fossil fuel power plants can achieve 36–40% efficiency. Supercritical designs have efficiencies in the low to mid 40% range, with new "ultra critical" designs using pressures of 4,400 psi (30 MPa) and dual stage reheat reaching about 48% efficiency.

    Ideal diesel efficiency of 56%, but lets stay sane, I keep hearing more along the lines of 35% (Probably BS but real numbers have been banished/obfuscated/hidden somewhere)

    Factor in 15% to 50% (extreme) grid transmission loss, and (ops) 5% to 10% electric motor loss.

    Love the idea of a Ultra Capacitor for a Hybrid, just stop saying silly things. Less CO2, you're funny.

    1. Re:How...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot regenerative braking.

    2. Re:How...... by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Buses (at least in London, can't speak for the town in question) are almost exclusively on a "accelerate from the last stop" or "brake for the next stop" sort of ride.

      The Pendolino trains on the West Coast Main Line are claimed to get a 17% reduction in energy use due to regenerative braking and that's an intercity line.

      http://www.alycidon.com/ALYCIDON%20RAIL/INFORMED%20SOURCES%20ARCHIVE/INF%20SRCS%202007/Informed%20Sources%2007%202007.htm
      (Scroll down to Technology)

      I have no idea what sort of benefit regenerative braking would give for an urban bus but I'd be surprised if it was less than 30% and I could believe figures of 60%+.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    3. Re:How...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Factor in 15% to 50% (extreme) grid transmission loss, and (ops) 5% to 10% electric motor loss.

      Now you're getting desperate. Even 15% grid loss would be extreme.

      Motor loss is whatever you choose it to be. It usually comes down to which costs less: using thicker copper to reduce the amount of energy converted to heat, or improving the cooling to get rid of the heat.

    4. Re:How...... by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      A dirty coal plant can put out a lot worse than CO2. Various oxides of sulfur and nitrogen which can cause acid rain and are probably stronger greenhouse gasses than CO2. Then there's mercury, other heavy metals, and radioactive isotopes that are released into the air. Finally, don't forget particulate (ash), which may cause a reverse greenhouse effect by blocking out sunlight, but makes the air very dirty.

      Of course, diesel has impurities too, and without a good emissions control system it might be as bad as coal, but the point is you can't judge the environmental impact of an energy source on CO2 alone.

    5. Re:How...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, in addition to the fact that the diesel is going to produce water, and allot less CO2 than the coal burning plant.

      Petroleum diesel is a Hydrocarbon!

  43. burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    For the 20 years of my life in the US, I have never seen a car burning on the side of the road.

    I've seen a car catch fire after an accident. I also knew someone who burned to death after the car she was in caught on fire, she was wearing her seat belt which became jambed. For this very reason I hate mandatory seatbelt laws, if there's the possibility someone will burn to death they should have the choice as to whether or not they will wear a seatbelt. The only thing worse than burning to death is surviving having your body burned.

    Falcon

    1. Re:burning cars by mmontour · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For this very reason I hate mandatory seatbelt laws, if there's the possibility someone will burn to death they should have the choice as to whether or not they will wear a seatbelt.

      If you don't wear a seatbelt, you may suffer additional injuries that prevent you from escaping a burning car. You will also be worse off in any accident that does not involve a car fire. A much better solution is to wear your damn seatbelt and carry one of these in the car.

    2. Re:burning cars by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Gee, I carry a knife.

    3. Re:burning cars by Jbcarpen · · Score: 1

      she was wearing her seat belt which became jammed.

      Things like this are why everyone should carry (at least) a pocketknife, either on them or in their car within easy reach. Mandatory seatbelt laws save far more lives than they cost, and the problem you quote is so easily avoided that it's a straw man arguement against them. Though current seatbelt buckles are not as reliable to release as the old style flip buckles, so perhaps there should be a law regarding the reliability of the release mechanism, kind of like the one regarding the reliability of brakes.

      --
      GENERATION 667: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation
    4. Re:burning cars by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's like doors in elevators. They can cause so many problems I mean imagine that you're stuck in an elevator and there's a fire or the elevator is about to drop. Well if you didn't have any doors you could easily go out!!

      Seatbelts may save tens of thousands of persons a year, but if even one person dies because of a seatbelt, is it really worth it?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:burning cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't wear a seatbelt, you may suffer additional injuries that prevent you from escaping a burning car. You will also be worse off in any accident that does not involve a car fire. A much better solution is to wear your damn seatbelt and carry one of these in the car.

      Last time I was in a car accident we was three persons in that car, and the car ended upside-down. Two of us did not use seat belt, and could leave the car at once. The last person used seat belt, and was stuck sitting upside-down until the firedep. came and cut the car to pieces so they could get in and remove the belt, and get her out of the car.

      While we that did NOT use seatbelt got only minor injured, she got here shoulders crushed and inside bleeding in the stomach. All caused by the seatbelt.

      So I choose not to use seat belts, thank you...

    6. Re:burning cars by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      idiot... the lifehammer has a safe knife built in so seatbelts and restraint straps can be cut easily without worrying about cutting the person. A knife's no good for breaking out a window...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    7. Re:burning cars by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      A knife's no good for breaking out a window...

      I suspect you don't know how to break tempered glass. Smack the tip of this knife into your window and you're good to go.

      Also, starting posts with "idiot..." is a sign of general inability and it undermines discourse. If your objective is more to be ornery than it is to learn things, you might end up fairly ignorant.

    8. Re:burning cars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would like to see the data involved in an accident that was so bad the seat belt actually jammed, and the person in the seat belt was otherwise fine.
      I am not a fireman or a paramedic, but I always stop when there is an accident to help. and in my limited experience, the only 'jammed' seatbelts weren't jammed, it was just the the people were panicking and couldn't operate it properly. Either by trying to push up on the belt and press the button, or simple missing the button.

      Small sample and I would love to talk to emergence personal about this. I'll bring it up at the next first responders meeting.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:burning cars by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      For this very reason I hate mandatory seatbelt laws, if there's the possibility someone will burn to death they should have the choice as to whether or not they will wear a seatbelt. The only thing worse than burning to death is surviving having your body burned.

      I'm fine with repealing mandatory seatbelt laws (for adults), but only under the condition that the ambulance and emergency room are not required to treat anyone who was stupid enough to get in a car wreck when they weren't wearing a seatbelt.

    10. Re:burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      A much better solution is to wear your damn seatbelt and carry one of these in the car.

      Personally I almost always have a knife in my pocket (another subject) so it doesn't matter much to me even if I didn't hate wearing a seat belt, but it's not like a child in the back seat can use one of those. Or an adult in the front seat can use one to free a child in the back seat.

      Falcon

      Gosh, what is it with all the nanny state laws and regulations.

    11. Re:burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      she was wearing her seat belt which became jammed.

      Things like this are why everyone should carry (at least) a pocketknife, either on them or in their car within easy reach.

      Personally I almost always have one of my Gerber's in one of my pockets, I've been carrying pocket knives since I was in elementary school. I, and a bunch of others, even carried our knives to school. But with the nanny state that's inadvisable today, whenever I go into a government building I have to take my knife out before entering.

      Mandatory seatbelt laws save far more lives than they cost, and the problem you quote is so easily avoided that it's a straw man arguement against them.

      Ah, so you're going to say the death of the elementary school girl I knew who burned to death could have been avoided? Yea, it could have, by not getting in a car. But because you apparently don't believe in personal responsibility you want government to dictate what can not and must do. I don't want to live in your world where governments can make victimless crimes.

      Falcon

    12. Re:burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's like doors in elevators. They can cause so many problems I mean imagine that you're stuck in an elevator and there's a fire or the elevator is about to drop. Well if you didn't have any doors you could easily go out!

      Straw man.

      Falcon

    13. Re:burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with repealing mandatory seatbelt laws (for adults), but only under the condition that the ambulance and emergency room are not required to treat anyone who was stupid enough to get in a car wreck when they weren't wearing a seatbelt.

      Do you also oppose mandatory treatment for anyone stupid enough to get in a car? They are both matters of choice.

      I wonder if you even know know anyone who works in a medical field, I personally do. My mother is a lab tech in a hospital and my older sister is a nurse.

      I also wonder if you'd feel the same if you were badly burned. May I suggest you visit Galveston Burns Hospital or another hospital specializing in burns. While there visit some patients screaming from agony.

      I don't know about you but that's probably the most effective way to get me to kill myself, burning my body. I'd rather go flying through a windshield and get run over than survive a total body burn.

      Falcon

    14. Re:burning cars by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know that using a strawman argument can be used to make a valid argument, which I did. Just because someone uses an analogy doesn't make their argument instantly invalid.

      In other words I have a good point and you have nothing to say for it. I accept your apology.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    15. Re:burning cars by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know that using a strawman argument can be used to make a valid argument, which I did.

      But you didn't. You can still move around in an elevator. But when your seatbelt gets jammed while wearing it you are not free to move much if at all. At least in an elevator you're not strapped down so that if the doors opens you can jump out. Wasn't there something in the news recently about a couple of kids being trapped in a burning car and how some bystanders rushed to save them got burnt too? Here, I think this might be it, Off-duty firefighters, bystanders rescue woman, 2 children from burning SUV in Milwaukee. Ah here we go, "John Rechlitz reached in again but couldn't find the seat belt release; someone gave him a knife to cut the car seat's restraints."

      Falcon

  44. Just an engineering problem by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

    Build a voltage regulator or something into the battery and there will be no risk of shock.

  45. The new terrorism by qyiet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ever wired a capacitor in backwards? I have, the result is loud.

    Now blowing up a bus might be as easy as cross wiring the charging terminals.

  46. Next sequel by KneelBeforeZod · · Score: 0

    Keep this bus going at 88 MPH or it'll explode... Back In The Future!!!

  47. camera-flash capacitor. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Don't ja now those things can discharge just by you trying to disconnect them? We're going to have to cut all 5 of these leads at the same tyme.

    Falcon

  48. Their CO2 claims don't make sense to me by jscheib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas:

    Fuel name CO2 emitted (lbs/106 Btu)
    Fuel oil 161
    Coal (bituminous) 205
    Coal (subbituminous) 213
    Coal (lignite) 215
    Coal (anthracite) 227

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_combustion_engine#Energy_efficiency:
    "most engines retain an average efficiency of about 18%-20%"

    From http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_energy_efficiency_of_an_average_coal_powered_plant:
    "According to Hans-Dieter Schilling (Energie-Fakten), the average efficiency of all coal power stations in the world currently stand at around 31%"

    Mashing those numbers around a bit I get around 900lbs of CO2 per usable MMBTU from diesel (fuel oil, close enough for these rough numbers), vs 700lbs of CO2 per usable MMBTU from coal based electricity. That's not even 1/3 less, far from the 2/3 less they are claiming.

    There are extraction/transmission/conversion losses in both cases that could be factored in, but it's hard to see how it could change their math by a factor of two.

    Am I missing something obvious?

  49. diesel by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    From the summary: "Even if you use the dirtiest coal plant on the planet [to charge an ultracapacitor], it generates a third of the carbon dioxide of diesel."

    Yea, notice it said "diesel" not biodiesel.

    Falcon

    1. Re:diesel by HiThere · · Score: 1

      But how much biodiesel is there? Enough for a few cars to run on it, sure. Especially if they're friends with a local restaurant that does a lot of deep frying. Nothing yet in any quantity, though.

      Doesn't mean it won't show up some time. Possibly as soon as three or four years. But you can't sell things now based on the fuel might be available in four years.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  50. burning cars by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    I've seen several cars burning on the side of the road. Usually the fire begins under the hood. Once saw a mercedes on fire in a taco bell parking lot. When I'm on the highway and see one, I usually take advantage of the opportunity to speed for the next 50 or so miles. If I get pulled over by the highway patrol, the plan is to tell the cops I was rushing to a payphone to dial 911 about the fire.

    Seth

  51. that "US company" is also Chinese by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    That "US comapny" that is Chinese, is really French. Then again Jaguar is owned by the Indian company Tata.

    Falcon

  52. ebay and in wheel motors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Detroit may not use them, but they are all over ebay in the electric bicycle and scooter areas. In addition, michelin has been working on them as well.

    Really, this is 2009....citing Detroit as a hot bed of engineering elegance and technical skills is a little passe now....that they _failed_ at some tech or "couldn't get it to work" is nothing new at all. In the US the REAL domestic far out and successful car and truck engineering goes on in autoracing, hotrod shops, modding shops and new startups. Detroit maintains their solid global C-minus rating at all costs...

    Here's Detroit, a movie reference-> Fat (unions) Drunk (stockholders) Stupid (management)

    That's no way to go through life, son..

      Detroit gets ideas, sure, any place BUT Detroit, then 15 years later starts showing some clunky million dollar prototypes, then 30 years later they enter production at double the cost and half the reliability of about anyone else. Here's my prediction along those lines teh VOLT!!11! ....a few months later.. Auto top headline news..GM was forced to recall all their (now 60 grand) volt models because of problems with the batteries..and computer systems...and paint job..and the small booster engine that catches fire and blows up....and new "mileage performance" tires that shed road gators worse then a semi running on fourth generation retreads..

    I'm from Detroit, keyword "from"

  53. How would it provide heat? by mirix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In my part of the world at least, you need a lot of power to warm a bus from -40 to something more reasonable. Diesels have a hard time keeping up.
    Would they have another bank of capacitors for resistive heating?

    What if the bus gets stuck in snow and runs out of charge? will the snow and slush cause problems with the charging contacts?

    Trolleybusses seem a lot more practical to me, I never understood why they are so unpopular in north america, even if only used in high density areas, where the infrastructure would pay off.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:How would it provide heat? by Melibeus · · Score: 1

      In my part of the world at least, you need a lot of power to cool a bus from +40C to something more reasonable.

      Perhaps I could export the heat from my buses to your buses.

    2. Re:How would it provide heat? by mirix · · Score: 1

      I think, even with inefficiency of a heat exchanger, cooling from +45 to +25 will use less juice that heating from -40 to +20..?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  54. ...except the one that makes the busses by GPool · · Score: 5, Informative

    Page 2 of TFA:

    Buses in the Shanghai pilot are made by Germantown, TN-based Foton America Bus Co, which uses ultracapacitors manufactured by Shanghai Aowei.

  55. DEVELOPERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! This message brought to you by Steve Ballmer.

  56. Not a mini-bus by Zouden · · Score: 1

    From the product page:
    http://www.sinautecus.com/products.html
    "Sinautec's forty-one seat Ultracap Buses have been serving the Greater Shanghai area since 2006. "

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
  57. The fat guy sang too Re:Until... by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  58. Bridge rectifier by cheros · · Score: 1

    No, just put a bridge rectifier over the bus load contacts (a fat one, it's going to handle a serious amount of current). It means you wouldn't even need to worry about which way round the connections are wired up, but you'll have a voltage drop over the diodes (you could also use one diode, but that would mean it would simply not load when connections are wrong).

    Having said that, I would like to see an ultracapacitor go "bang" - that's a lot of energy to release in one go..

    Alternatively, you may just end up with a bus driving backwards :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  59. Why not subway cars? by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

    Why build out the electric infrastructure at the bus stops when one already exists for the subway system? I don't believe there's anything in the current system to do regenerative braking or store power in the cars. So this would reduce the power requirements, eliminating the need to expand the electric capacity when adding more cars to the system.

    Once the subway works, then consider building the bus based system, unless a flywheel and/or hydrogen are doing the job cheaper.

    1. Re:Why not subway cars? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      It's not unusual for electric trollies or subway cars to send their braking energy back into the rails or catenaries. So long as there are some other cars somewhere on the line that are accelerating or at least holding steady speed against friction and wind resistance the braking energy will be re-used nearby with very little loss, possibly less than you'd lose with a battery, capacitor, or flywheel setup.

  60. Make a brittle flywheel by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make the flywheel brittle - like a ceramic or like those shotgun rounds that disintegrate when breaching a door. That way if containment is breached, it turns into powder.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Make a brittle flywheel by n17ikh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is how modern flywheel energy storage works. The rotor is typically made out of carbon fiber or a composite thread wound around a shaft - if the rotor's integrity is lost, it turns into red-hot slag instead of leveling half a city block. Even so, most large flywheels are in a bunker underground encased in several feet of concrete. For it to be safe in a vehicle the containment vessel has to be very strong and also lightweight - which means it'll be expensive, unfortunately.

      --
      Hard work pays off tomorrow, but procrastination pays off NOW!
    2. Re:Make a brittle flywheel by dkf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For [a flywheel] to be safe in a vehicle the containment vessel has to be very strong and also lightweight - which means it'll be expensive, unfortunately.

      Research in this area has been encouraged within the space of F1 motor racing. The aim is exactly that if there is a containment breach (relatively likely in a crash in F1, which isn't exactly the world's safest sport) then the flywheel turns to dust rather than killing the driver. Something like that sounds like what's needed for the bus application...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    3. Re:Make a brittle flywheel by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Or out of hard candy like Sweet Tarts!

      (people would be smashing in to busses, just hoping for a spill of sugar powder)

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  61. Carbon Dioxide an issue??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carbon Dioxide? Really a problem?
    Monoxide, sure.
    Plants BREATHE carbon dioxide. Haven't heard of any problems with dioxide buildup anywhere, either....

  62. Interesting? Doesn't work by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Informative
    All these things were tried, and failed, in the 19th century. That's how old this is. If you do that, then the radius of the axle to the wheel is constantly varying which means that the angular velocity of the wheel has to change very fast - which it cannot do because the transmission requires it to be fixed.

    The solution, found in the 20th century, was the constant velocity joint. Tinfoil hat not needed. They went to Detroit and some old guy in the SAE said "folks, we tried that and it was a very bad idea because..."

    Car makers have had over a hundred years of experience of what does, and what doesn't work. They don't suppress technology because it might replace theirs - everybody wants a technology lead. They just don't buy stuff that doesn't work.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  63. POW by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Don't put your tongue across the terminals.

  64. I must be tired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the title as "Ultravelociraptor bus charges at each stop"

  65. Not tin foil, Standard Oil: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Great American streetcar scandal (also known as the General Motors streetcar conspiracy and the National City Lines conspiracy) is a conspiracy in which streetcar systems throughout the United States were dismantled and replaced with buses in the mid-20th century as a result of illegal actions by a number of prominent companies, acting through National City Lines (NCL), Pacific City Lines (on the West Coast, starting in 1938), and American City Lines (in large cities, starting in 1943).

    National, which had been in operation since 1920, was organized into a holding company, and General Motors, Firestone Tire, Standard Oil of California, Phillips Petroleum, Mack, and the Federal Engineering Corporation made investments in the City Lines companies in return for exclusive supply contracts.[1] Between 1936 and 1950, National City Lines bought out more than 100 electric surface-traction systems in 45 cities,[2] including Detroit, New York City, Oakland, Philadelphia, Phoenix, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, Tulsa, Baltimore, Minneapolis, and Los Angeles, and replaced them with GM buses. American City Lines merged with National in 1946

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_streetcar_scandal

  66. Racing-style fuel tanks are the solution. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Every death caused by car fires is absolutely, 100%, cheaply preventable. All that's needed is a racing-style fuel cell, which contains a flexible bladder inside that prevents fuel from spilling when the hard outer shell is breached (that's why fires in racing are basically a thing of the past these days). These are commonly used in racing, and are standard equipment on many aircraft. They require no extra maintenance and the additional cost would be negligible in mass production. The only downsides are a very slight increase in weight (maybe 10lbs) and decrease in capacity (maybe a liter or two on an average-sized car tank). It's literally a tragedy that this is not required on all cars. It's much more important than curtain airbags or fucking OnStar. It really pisses me off when I hear of someone burning to death in a car accident.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Racing-style fuel tanks are the solution. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      All that's needed is a racing-style flexible bladder inside that prevents fuel from spilling when the hard outer shell is breached

      Like the roads are full with cars that have fuel cells. I must of missed that.

      It's much more important than curtain airbags or fucking OnStar.

      Have you ever seen mangled bodies in car accidents? Or have you never tried to tell an emergency operator where you're at in an accident? Personally I don't like OnStar, because of the possibility to use it for tracking, but they have saved lives, as have seatbelts and airbags.

      It really pisses me off when I hear of someone burning to death in a car accident.

      Same here, to me the worst way to die is to burn to death. And one of the most painful way to live is by surviving a bad burn, another is surviving a Traumatic Brain Injury. Because of the pain from the little I've been burned, I'd never ever want to be seriously burned. And surviving one would probably be the most effective way to get me to kill myself.

      Falcon

  67. Don't know about big UltraCaps, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but where I work we deal with quarter sized ones, and they are quite temperature sensitive, in fact on the circuit boards we make we expect them to be the first thing to break down due to thermal problems.

    Fortunately we are only using them as a back-up power supply for when the device suddenly loses power, so if they break down under normal conditions we can send a warning without losing anything.

  68. It's all about regenerative braking! by elkto · · Score: 1

    Nahh... It's all about regenerative braking.
    I am just poking fun at the silly statement that "the dirtiest coal plant on the planet [to charge an ultracapacitor], it generates a third of the carbon dioxide of diesel."
    That is silly
    A diesel hybrid would be da bomb!
    I could see ultracapacitor's used there.

  69. I don't think so.... by elkto · · Score: 1

    "Now you're getting desperate. Even 15% grid loss would be extreme"

    I do not think so. A decade ago, someone posted a cradle to grave power grid distribution graph. I would live to find a copy of it again. The striking thing to me was the grid loss. It only makes since given Ohm's law, miles of wire, and many transformers, but I had never considered it before that time. Losses illustrated were between 5% to 50% with 15% being the median.
    If you have empirical evidence to the contrary, I very much would like to have it! I have been looking for that graph for a while now.

  70. You are. by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Most Diesels are much more efficient than 18-20%. In fact, my small Mercedes Diesel engine is so efficient it requires an additional heater in winter because the heat output of the engine is not sufficient to heat the cabin when in low speed traffic.

    I suspect that the real issue is with emissions from Diesel engines in city traffic. The ultracapacitor approach gets the emissions out into the countryside, where the coal mining and power generating plants are.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  71. Inductance and dielectric limits current by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    This is a common misconception. Capacitors have significant inductance (have to be specially designed not to) and as everybody knows the rate of change of current is limited by the driving voltage and the inductance. As inductance does not convert current to heat (unlike resistance), putting inductance in a capacitor array does not waste energy like resistive limiting would. The converters that produce constant current from the array to drive the motors will themselves use inductors as part of the electronics. Also, there is a limited rate at which charge can move off the dielectric in ultracapacitors. Fancy dielectrics like barium titanate have much lower charge mobility than, say, polypropylene which stores practically no energy in the dielectric at all.

    If you doubt this, there is a simple experiment you can do. Find an old high voltage electrolytic capacitor. Charge to a few hundred volts (if you don't know how to do this you should not be doing it.) Then discharge it with a suitable insulated screwdriver, but don't keep the screwdriver on too long. You will get a bang. A check with a voltmeter will reveal residual charge on the capacitor, in fact it may still be unsafe to handle.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  72. Poison != Climate Change by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    while in the US obstructionists are still yelling "climate change is a myth!", China is going green because it's realized it has poisoned its citizen enough.

    China has horrific air quality that actually kills people. Hardly anyone in NATO dies directly from air quality unless they start the engine while the car's still in the garage.

    Look forward to them exporting their tech to the rest of the world...

    Looking forward to them exporting their values and ideals to the rest of the world too?

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    1. Re:Poison != Climate Change by netsharc · · Score: 1

      > Looking forward to them exporting their values and ideals to the rest of the world too?

      As opposed to the US values and ideals? "We don't torture*","Justice and fair trial for all**", and what else..

      * except that they fucking do!!!
      ** 7 years in a 4x4x4ft cage with no proof of guilt, or one based on a confession beaten out of you, or one by a military tribunal where your lawyer is at best not allowed to talk to you in confidence, and at worst is working against you?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  73. Adiabatic Diesel Engine by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Why not an adiabatic diesel engine? Some time ago DARPA had a project for a ceramic diesel engine; by reducing heat loss to the environment by running the ting with no cooling system they were predicting about 80% efficiency.

    I don't know why they gave up on it but it seems to me this would put an end to electric vehicles permanently.

  74. Forget the bus.. by formfeed · · Score: 1
    .. these lazy kids could also walk to school (in the snow, uphill, both ways, like I did).

    But, think what wonderful coil gun one could build with these caps.

  75. Capacitor explosion by gwn · · Score: 1

    I recall having capacitors blow in power supplies... often results in fudge production... Don't want to be on that bus when the capacitor blows. Good idea though.

  76. There are some problems there by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "Moreover, with four wheel-motors, there is no differential neither transmission. It is a direct drive, and there is no energy loss between the motor and wheels, as in a car with central engine. This is a second reason why wheel-motors consume less energy, particularly during cold winters."

    They don't mention how they make up for no differential. You kind of need something to compensate for the wheel turning during a turn. Something dynamic an instantly responsive.

    It go scrapped becasue it wasn't viable, or there is something already in the works.

    Now, if there was a market for really efficient cars, they would sell really efficient cars. In reality efficiency* has been lower on a new car buyers list then comfort and convenience.

    High mileage ultra efficiency cars are in the auto makers best interest.

    *It seems one is finally emerging.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  77. Batacitor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Came in hoping for a reference to Philip Jose Farmer's The Fabulous Riverboat.

    Leaving disappointed.

  78. But how much biodiesel is there? by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    I don't know but there's Willie Nelson Biodiesel, yes Willie Nelson has a chain stations selling biodiesel.

    Doesn't mean it won't show up some time. Possibly as soon as three or four years. But you can't sell things now based on the fuel might be available in four years.

    The same applies to fuel cells and the hydrogen economy. I favor research into different energy sources, just not with taxpayer subsidies.

    Falcon

    Ah, Willie Nelson. One of the Highway Men.

  79. annoying stops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, you are the only person on the bus late at night on your way home after enjoying a few beverages, no one else wants to get on or off, yet the bus keeps stopping for a minute at a time to recharge while your bladder gets closer to exploding.

    I pity the drivers of these things, they have a hard enough job already

  80. Re:So now we're literally giving Washington to Chi by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Profit! :>