"A quote from a sony cio interview from 2007 regarding security sums up the problem and assures this type of mess will continue...
"The cost to harden the legacy database against a possible intrusion could come to $10 million, he says. The cost to notify customers in case of a breach might be $1 million. With those figures, says Spaltro, âoeitâ(TM)s a valid business decision to accept the riskâ of a security breach. âoeI will not invest $10 million to avoid a possible $1 million loss,â he suggests."
The rule that works. All employees making 60% or more of what the CEO makes including salary, stock options, bonus, PTO, and any other perks can be included in being exempt from over time. All others below the 60% mark get overtime.
The ping command makes the remote server ping that destination. Commanding the server to ping not respond to a ping. That is a none destructive test of an apache web site.
I wonder is a self-defense or "stand your ground" defense could be used if you were ever charged for hacking them when they were trying to hack / scam you....
These are the comments I love. These are the same people that bitch that the government is spending more then it brings in. They are also the people that bitch that we are just "printing money". Hey here is an issue where people are stealing services and should be paying in as everyone else does so maybe we are not bankrupt... nope.. they will hold the party line. No taxes, the government should learn to repair roads, offer services, etc by magic....
If that is the case will you be voting against the congress person from your state if they voted for the Patriot Act? No matter who or what political party they are from? If not then you continue to cause the invasion of privacy.
I love the "Job creator" argument. If they only kill 3 towns its ok because well, they are job creators. If they only poison 1 states water supply its ok. I mean they make all the jobs for those same people that are now dying due to drinking the water.
If I promise to pay you 500K a year for a job I create for you, is it then ok to randomly kill your family members? I mean I am creating jobs.
Yep. Like AT&T. They were "taken" and split up. Now we have Sprint, Verizon, AT&T. Right when they were "taken" all innovation stopped, all investment stopped.
That is the talking points of all big business. If you regulate us we will move to another country. Yea right, because those other countries don't regulate. I call BS on all of the "job creators".
Just remember mouth piece. 1. The meltdown: Congress remove the funding for the Justice Department so they now have 1/3 the amount of people to pursue the financial crisis. ( call it Obama all you want but he did not defund the people who would build the legal cases to prosecute). 2. due process free detention / execution: Stated enemy combatant, traitor or terrorist can be engaged by lethal means. Yep if you are a traitor move to a foreign location to be trained by known terrorist, for the purpose of attacking America or American people the US can attack you. Even if you have now moved back to the US to perform those traitor or terrorist actions.
I would assume you would prefer that we remove the federal sentencing of "up to death" for traitors?
Go hate to go hate. When all of "your" team votes for the laws agrees with the de funding then complains that the laws are used as worded and and no one has been prosecuted. Well that is an issue you created so stop bitching.
I am not saying Obama has done great things but damn people. Make the mess then bitch at someone else. Rinse and repeat.
The big problem with using the house analogy is that everyone forgets the first part. The first part is I put out a sign in my yard saying everyone please come into my house and take what you want. I also post on craigslist and in the newspaper my address and let them know to come in and take what they want. Then when they come in what I really mean is come into the living room and take what you want. They went into the bedroom and took stuff and now I am upset.
Almost every system that is not for public connection but is connected to the internet now has a legal banner stating you are not allowed in unless authorized.
That is correct. It is against the law. So every single congressman and woman (both repubs and dems) who not only voted for it in the beginning but renewed the laws (with gusto watch the interviews) then complained how the law was used should go to prison. Making a law then complaining that it is used is a bad law!
The association between religion and the belief that âoe I am pure and you are going to hellâ is so ingrained that merely thinking about it can trigger more immoral behavior, according to a study by researchers at the University of Kansas. The researchers hypothesized that there is a deep-seated perception that my religion makes me better then you â" its emphasis on myth-seeking, self-importance and irrationality privileges above all else. The researchers conducted four separate studies to test this. In the first, participants read a bible passage of a date-rape and were asked to rate the 'wrongness' of the offense. Those reporting greater belief in religion condemned the victim more harshly stating âoeshe probably deserved itâ. This was also followed up with the strong believe that if it was a âoerealâ rape then her body would just reject any possibility of pregnancy.
Just a thought. Forget actual failure. What happens when they have IP data or licensed data that is being hosted by a cloud provider, or company to company lawsuit. Court case starts. Could or would they they seize all computers / servers that could house the data? What would happen to the other peoples data that resides on the same physical hardware?
Slashdot Mirror
Try regulation that includes criminal penalties including jail time in blue collar prison.
Let me guess regulation bad... banks are people!
Management feels it is better not to secure.
"A quote from a sony cio interview from 2007 regarding security sums up the problem and assures this type of mess will continue...
"The cost to harden the legacy database against a possible intrusion could come to $10 million, he says. The cost to notify customers in case of a breach might be $1 million. With those figures, says Spaltro, âoeitâ(TM)s a valid business decision to accept the riskâ of a security breach. âoeI will not invest $10 million to avoid a possible $1 million loss,â he suggests."
http://www.cio.com/article/243...
The rule that works.
All employees making 60% or more of what the CEO makes including salary, stock options, bonus, PTO, and any other perks can be included in being exempt from over time.
All others below the 60% mark get overtime.
"Let them eat cake!"
http-header = Cookie:() { :; }; ping -c 3 209.126.230.74 :; }; ping -c 3 209.126.230.74 :; }; ping -c 3 209.126.230.74
http-header = Host:() {
http-header = Referer:() {
The ping command makes the remote server ping that destination. Commanding the server to ping not respond to a ping. That is a none destructive test of an apache web site.
I wonder is a self-defense or "stand your ground" defense could be used if you were ever charged for hacking them when they were trying to hack / scam you....
The app that functions like a clock.
Can we sue for false advertisement at this point?
They told the government it was not a cap. So How are they charging me??
These are the comments I love. These are the same people that bitch that the government is spending more then it brings in. They are also the people that bitch that we are just "printing money". Hey here is an issue where people are stealing services and should be paying in as everyone else does so maybe we are not bankrupt... nope.. they will hold the party line. No taxes, the government should learn to repair roads, offer services, etc by magic....
Too late to become a prepper?
If that is the case will you be voting against the congress person from your state if they voted for the Patriot Act? No matter who or what political party they are from? If not then you continue to cause the invasion of privacy.
I love the "Job creator" argument.
If they only kill 3 towns its ok because well, they are job creators. If they only poison 1 states water supply its ok. I mean they make all the jobs for those same people that are now dying due to drinking the water.
If I promise to pay you 500K a year for a job I create for you, is it then ok to randomly kill your family members? I mean I am creating jobs.
Here is the link to the FCC to file your comment. http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comme...
do you have or know of a website or blog on how to set this up?
Yep. Like AT&T.
They were "taken" and split up.
Now we have Sprint, Verizon, AT&T.
Right when they were "taken" all innovation stopped, all investment stopped.
That is the talking points of all big business. If you regulate us we will move to another country. Yea right, because those other countries don't regulate. I call BS on all of the "job creators".
Just remember mouth piece.
1. The meltdown: Congress remove the funding for the Justice Department so they now have 1/3 the amount of people to pursue the financial crisis. ( call it Obama all you want but he did not defund the people who would build the legal cases to prosecute).
2. due process free detention / execution: Stated enemy combatant, traitor or terrorist can be engaged by lethal means. Yep if you are a traitor move to a foreign location to be trained by known terrorist, for the purpose of attacking America or American people the US can attack you. Even if you have now moved back to the US to perform those traitor or terrorist actions.
I would assume you would prefer that we remove the federal sentencing of "up to death" for traitors?
Go hate to go hate. When all of "your" team votes for the laws agrees with the de funding then complains that the laws are used as worded and and no one has been prosecuted. Well that is an issue you created so stop bitching.
I am not saying Obama has done great things but damn people. Make the mess then bitch at someone else. Rinse and repeat.
The big problem with using the house analogy is that everyone forgets the first part.
The first part is I put out a sign in my yard saying everyone please come into my house and take what you want. I also post on craigslist and in the newspaper my address and let them know to come in and take what they want.
Then when they come in what I really mean is come into the living room and take what you want. They went into the bedroom and took stuff and now I am upset.
Almost every system that is not for public connection but is connected to the internet now has a legal banner stating you are not allowed in unless authorized.
That is correct. It is against the law. So every single congressman and woman (both repubs and dems) who not only voted for it in the beginning but renewed the laws (with gusto watch the interviews) then complained how the law was used should go to prison. Making a law then complaining that it is used is a bad law!
My 2 cents
Care to drink the water down rivier from a fracking location?
Stated like a true developer.
It's not the lawyers, it's the developers.
The association between religion and the belief that âoe I am pure and you are going to hellâ is so ingrained that merely thinking about it can trigger more immoral behavior, according to a study by researchers at the University of Kansas. The researchers hypothesized that there is a deep-seated perception that my religion makes me better then you â" its emphasis on myth-seeking, self-importance and irrationality privileges above all else. The researchers conducted four separate studies to test this. In the first, participants read a bible passage of a date-rape and were asked to rate the 'wrongness' of the offense. Those reporting greater belief in religion condemned the victim more harshly stating âoeshe probably deserved itâ. This was also followed up with the strong believe that if it was a âoerealâ rape then her body would just reject any possibility of pregnancy.
Password123
Just a thought. Forget actual failure. What happens when they have IP data or licensed data that is being hosted by a cloud provider, or company to company lawsuit. Court case starts. Could or would they they seize all computers / servers that could house the data? What would happen to the other peoples data that resides on the same physical hardware?
Speaking of you can post your own petition. Here goes! https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/congressional-reform-act-2011-congress-must-equally-abide-all-laws-they-impose-american-people/s3DTkzrl sopa had senators back of because enough people took notice. If more then just 25K sign it shows we are looking and paying attention.