What exactly is wrong with that? Standards are meant to be universally adopted and having standard essential patents not be licensed under FRAND terms goes against that. If Samsung didn't want to be tied by FRAND terms then they shouldn't have forced their patents into the standards. Other than anti-Apple screed, I don't see any reason why standard essential patents shouldn't be FRAND. You do realize that making these patents non-FRAND does more than just stick it to Apple, right? For example, there would then be nothing stopping Samsung for holding these patents over any of their competitors head and force them out of the market through heavy licensing fees f these patents were not under FRAND terms. And if you think Samsung wouldn't do such a thing you are extremely naive.
No he isn't right. Just because someone voluntarily share's personal information does not justify the government coerce my doctor, my phone company, etc. that they must divulge private information without my consent.
Except that these unimmunized children can then spread these same diseases to other children. So, no, it's not just the parent's business when their choices can cause harm to those around them.
Outside of a couple of toy langauges pretty much all major programming langauges in use are from last century. That's a really dumb qualifier to use as a negative.
No, they mistakenly thought they could buy marketshare by picking up a company on the fast track to irrelevance for the better part for years leading up to the buyout bid.
Yes, which means it should be far more advanced than the A5X. The A5X is the same A5 from March of last year doing nothing but bumping the core count in the GPU and adding some memory. The GPU in it is just the 3 year old SGX543 that is also underclocked ain comparison to something like the PS Vita that uses the same GPU core but at a higher clock speed. So the Tegra should have had no issues beating the A5X in every test hands down.
Yeah, it's not like cops have more important cases to deal with than a petty theft, right? I'm pretty sure that solving a murder, for example, is a better way to spend their time than finding a $500 cell phone.
Then they'll just use that as an excuse to fire people. So in the end, every punishment is going to negatively effect someone. The solution is not no punishment at all.
Slashdot Mirror
What exactly is wrong with that? Standards are meant to be universally adopted and having standard essential patents not be licensed under FRAND terms goes against that. If Samsung didn't want to be tied by FRAND terms then they shouldn't have forced their patents into the standards. Other than anti-Apple screed, I don't see any reason why standard essential patents shouldn't be FRAND. You do realize that making these patents non-FRAND does more than just stick it to Apple, right? For example, there would then be nothing stopping Samsung for holding these patents over any of their competitors head and force them out of the market through heavy licensing fees f these patents were not under FRAND terms. And if you think Samsung wouldn't do such a thing you are extremely naive.
Because using the kinect to do all the voice recognition means they don't have to do it themselves?
Except that the kinect is what is doing the voice recognition. It's not just being used as mic input.
No he isn't right. Just because someone voluntarily share's personal information does not justify the government coerce my doctor, my phone company, etc. that they must divulge private information without my consent.
But none of that then justifies the government forcing someone to divulge private information. It's a fallacious slippery slope argument.
Yes, it's not theft... That is until it involves GPL code.
Yes because it makes perfect sense to add engine sounds for deaf people...
So this being done for zombies? Otherwise why would dead people care?
And, yes, I know you meant 'deaf' but that makes even less sense than your typo.
Except that these unimmunized children can then spread these same diseases to other children. So, no, it's not just the parent's business when their choices can cause harm to those around them.
Almost none of the researchers themselves would profit from such things.
Outside of a couple of toy langauges pretty much all major programming langauges in use are from last century. That's a really dumb qualifier to use as a negative.
The smart screens will eventually be wired to make Skype calls, log onto e-mail accounts and serve as WiFi hotspots, Touchet said.
From the article itself.
No, they mistakenly thought they could buy marketshare by picking up a company on the fast track to irrelevance for the better part for years leading up to the buyout bid.
And Ballmer sighs with relief at not having bought this turkey.
The very definition of 'pursue' is 'to follow' so your attempt at semantic word games falls flat.
It's doubtful they even have credentials.
wxWidgets? GTK+? FLTK? I could go on.
The problem with this approach is that you can never have either a non-programmer or a GUI tool help design your user interface.
So then Qt Designer and Interface Builder, two tools for GUI design, don't exist?
Yes, which means it should be far more advanced than the A5X. The A5X is the same A5 from March of last year doing nothing but bumping the core count in the GPU and adding some memory. The GPU in it is just the 3 year old SGX543 that is also underclocked ain comparison to something like the PS Vita that uses the same GPU core but at a higher clock speed. So the Tegra should have had no issues beating the A5X in every test hands down.
He should've had a reverse peephole...
Unfortunately he has a very small krum so he's inadequate at sexy time.
At least they didn't give them fermented horse piss as drinks.
Yeah, it's not like cops have more important cases to deal with than a petty theft, right? I'm pretty sure that solving a murder, for example, is a better way to spend their time than finding a $500 cell phone.
Then they'll just use that as an excuse to fire people. So in the end, every punishment is going to negatively effect someone. The solution is not no punishment at all.
Since when is "fraud" just a "bad choice"?